A high-throughput strategy for screening of bacterial artificial chromosome libraries and anchoring of clones on a genetic map constructed with single nucleotide polymorphisms
© Luo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 11 July 2008
Accepted: 18 January 2009
Published: 18 January 2009
Current techniques of screening bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries for molecular markers during the construction of physical maps are slow, laborious and often assign multiple BAC contigs to a single locus on a genetic map. These limitations are the principal impediment in the construction of physical maps of large eukaryotic genomes. It is hypothesized that this impediment can be overcome by screening multidimensional pools of BAC clones using the highly parallel Illumina GoldenGate™ assay.
To test the efficacy of the Golden Gate assay in BAC library screening, multidimensional pools involving 302976 Aegilops tauschii BAC clones were genotyped for the presence/absence of specific gene sequences with multiplexed Illumina GoldenGate oligonucleotide assays previously used to place single nucleotide polymorphisms on an Ae. tauschii genetic map. Of 1384 allele-informative oligonucleotide assays, 87.6% successfully clustered BAC pools into those positive for a BAC clone harboring a specific gene locus and those negative for it. The location of the positive BAC clones within contigs assembled from 199190 fingerprinted Ae. tauschii BAC clones was used to evaluate the precision of anchoring of BAC clones and contigs on the Ae. tauschii genetic map. For 41 (95%) assays, positive BAC clones were neighbors in single contigs. Those contigs could be unequivocally assigned to loci on the genetic map. For two (5%) assays, positive clones were in two different contigs and the relationships of these contigs to loci on the Ae. tauschii genetic map were equivocal. Screening of BAC libraries with a simple five-dimensional BAC pooling strategy was evaluated and shown to allow direct detection of positive BAC clones without the need for manual deconvolution of BAC clone pools.
The highly parallel Illumina oligonucleotide assay is shown here to be an efficient tool for screening BAC libraries and a strategy for high-throughput anchoring of BAC contigs on genetic maps during the construction of physical maps of eukaryotic genomes. In most cases, screening of BAC libraries with Illumina oligonucleotide assays results in the unequivocal relationship of BAC clones with loci on the genetic map.
In species devoid of complete genomic sequence information, libraries of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones  are an indispensable genomic tool. The utility of BAC libraries has been further enhanced by the development of high-information-content-fingerprinting (HICF) techniques [2–4] and the FPC program for the assembly of fingerprinted BAC clones into contigs [5–7], which opened the door to the construction of BAC-based physical maps of plant and animal genomes (for review see ). An operation common to virtually all applications of BAC libraries is screening the libraries for clones harboring specific nucleotide sequences. Current screening techniques utilize either DNA-DNA hybridization or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In some applications, such as the construction of a physical map, a BAC library must be screened for the presence of hundreds or thousands of different molecular markers. To maximize the efficiency of such screening, multidimensional pooling of clones or probes is employed ; probes are pooled if a library is screened by DNA-DNA hybridization  and clones are pooled if it is screened by PCR .
All current screening strategies are laborious, slow, error prone, and often result in ambiguous assignments of BAC clones to loci on a genetic map. The identification of BAC clones harboring specific nucleotide sequences by hybridization of multidimensional pools of overgo probes with BAC library screening membranes , in addition to some of the above problems, also requires handling large amounts of radioactive material. The greatest impediment to screening of BAC libraries with pools of cDNA clones or overgo probes is that a single probe often hybridizes with clones in multiple contigs, either due to gene duplication, the presence of repeated sequences, or other reasons. Unequivocal assignment of BAC clones to loci on the genetic map requires additional work.
We describe here a BAC library screening strategy that is largely devoid of these limitations and can be performed in a high-throughput mode. The strategy employs Illumina GoldenGate™ oligonucleotide assays, also referred to as Oligonucleotide Pool Assays (OPAs), that are currently used for the highly parallel SNP genotyping of genomic DNAs . Each assay targets a specific SNP locus and utilizes two allele-specific oligonucleotides to discriminate between SNP alleles. The allele discriminating nucleotide of an allele-specific oligonucleotide is at its 3' end. Another primer, the locus-specific oligonucleotide, which contains an address sequence for the SNP locus, anneals downstream of the SNP. After annealing one of the two allele-specific oligonucleotides to the genomic DNA template, the oligonucleotide is extended by DNA polymerase and ligated to the locus-specific oligonucleotide downstream forming a contiguous PCR template. Primer extension and ligation can be performed at up to 1536 loci simultaneously. The templates are PCR amplified using three PCR primers complementary to specific sequences inserted into all oligonucleotides. Two primers anneal to the allele-specific oligonucleotides; one for each SNP is labeled with the Cy3 fluorochrome and the other with the Cy5 fluorochrome. The third anneals to the locus specific oligonucleotide. The ratio of the Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence is used to determine the genotype at a SNP locus. If the ratio is near 0 or 1 (near pure Cy3 or near pure Cy5 fluorescence), the locus is homozygous. If the ratio is about 1: 1 the locus is heterozygous.
It is shown here that annealing of allele- and locus-specific oligonucleotides to a pool of BAC DNAs and the subsequent primer extension and ligation reaction can be used to determine whether or not a BAC pool DNA harbors a specific locus. This allows genotyping the BAC pool for the presence or absence of the locus. It is also shown that BAC genotyping with Illumina oligonucleotide assays results in a high percentage of unequivocal assignments of BAC clones and BAC contigs to loci on a genetic map.
A six-dimensional BAC pooling strategy has previously been successfully used to genotype 24576 sorghum BAC clones (about 4× sorghum genome equivalents) for the presence or absence of specific amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) amplicons during sorghum physical map construction . The pooling strategy utilized 184 pools. Although the six-dimensional strategy worked well for the sorghum genome, it results in too many pools for large genomes, such as those of wheat and its diploid ancestors. One genome equivalent of Aegilops tauschii (1C = 4,020 Mb ), one of the three diploid ancestors of polyploid wheat, amounts to 30000 to 40000 BAC clones, depending on the average size of DNA inserts. To facilitate screening multiple genome equivalents of large genomes, such as that of Ae. tauschii, but keeping the numbers of pools manageably low, a simple, five-dimensional pooling strategy was designed and evaluated here.
Contigs built from 199190 Ae. tauschii BAC clones  fingerprinted with the SNaPshot HICF technology  were simultaneously screened with 1384 multiplexed Illumina GoldenGate assays. Assignments of BAC clones and contigs to gene loci on the Ae. tauschii chromosome 2D genetic map were analyzed to assess the proportion of BAC clones and contigs unequivocally assigned to individual loci on the genetic map.
Genotyping of genomic DNA and BAC pool DNA with Illumina GoldenGate assays
BAC clone, BAC contig and genetic locus correspondence
Oligonucleotides for 1536 Ae. tauschii SNPs were designed and multiplexed but only 1383 proved useful to interrogate DNA of 574 Ae. tauschii F2 plants because for 153 of them AL8/78 and AS75 parents were monomorphic or were not homozygous. Three distinct clusters (two homozygotes and the heterozygote), similar to those shown in Fig. 1A, were obtained for 1212 sets (87.6%). The 1212 SNPs were mapped at 705 EST loci (some loci contained several SNPs) on the Ae. tauschii map (to be reported elsewhere). Genotype call areas exported from these data were used to genotype BAC super-pools into positive and negative clusters (as shown in Fig. 1B). All Illumina assays that successfully clustered F2 genomic DNAs also successfully clustered super-pools into positive and negative clusters.
Anchoring of Ae. tauschii contigs on the genetic map of Ae. tauschii chromosome 2D with Illumina GoldenGate oligonucleotide assays.
Map position (cM)
Positive clones anchored
RI063B22, HI094B3, HB051N10
HD143B20, RI053K20, RI127F20, HI043L21, HD013G23
HB123G1, RI004M10, HI113P4, RI105L19*
HI143K4, HI003A22, HI012B19, HI090K7, HD123H5, RI056P19, BB048O9
BB093B14, HB123K12, HB008P16, HB133H13
HB004F21, HB123L18, HB123M5, HD008O15
HD087H2, HD141H13, HD137I4, HB059H9, RI112C12, RI118E2, HD121I8, HI123C14, BB100F2*
HB012H8, HI129G1, HD057E7, HD121M12
HI090L10, RI035P6, BB079N19, BB110C10, HB043B9
HD072M21, HB007A23, HI050N18, HB015E4, HB035C6, HB036O19, HI039G10, HB060O15, HD151B19
HD116C6, HB009B12, HB040H21, HI140N22, HI124O3
HD039I3, RI012F23, HD107L14, HI077L6, RI070K18, RI024B7*
RI015E2, HI117D24, HI148P10
HI053D12, HI037I5, HI094B9, HI122O11, HI152F13
HB034O15, HB062N11, RI112D8, HI029J12, HD032F21
HD132P10, HB021B10, HD033G4, HI148C2, BB067M15, BB081E2, BB107K11, RI043J14 *
HD074O4, BB054A2, HB027O2, RI107N10, RI136G23, HI037F12
BB038N07, HB023N15, HB081O4, HD080K19, HI078L18, HI146A6, RI084G17, BB123G5*
HD065I16, HD050E11, HD053J2, HD057A20, HB055D1, HB083C24, RI076J11
BB092N18, BB070C1, HB006B8, HB086J7, HB096K20, HD133P21, HI137N13, RI019F6
RI020P1, RI091B2, HD091O22, HD137A8, HB078N22, BB032J4,
HD062D2, BB047B24, HB110L22, HI080L19, RI061L5, RI064P6
HD074J1, HD068K4, HI052G12, RI076M20, RI124J20
HB125P19, HB075P15, BB003G7
BB061O1, BB061P1, HB040G1, HB082C18, HB084M10, HD026P1, HD112E21 HI152K3, RI018P5, RI131L21, RI146B11
HB002K4, HD135K22, RI013H19, RI023K17, BB083K1*
BB011G22, HD119G21, HI105F9, HD006K24*
HD074A1, HB001O3, HI143M21, HD034C5, RI051M5
HI004N13, BB104N3, HD120D6
HD075A10, HD123P4, HI026J16, HI061H17, HI116C6, RI119E3
HB003H1, BB025P18, HD005P3, HD049H11, HI116D20, HI130J21, RI136C15,
RI083G1, RI113K18, RI143I24, HI019M23
HB006A23, HD052A8, HD063B18, HD066I10*
HB012D18, BB092N14, HB032L12, HD051K23, HI090M22, RI107M7
BB056F7, HB061D24, HB081H12, HB131E21, HD020E20, HI031B4, RI126O19
HB075L11, RI069N16, HI024C6, HI027G18, RI069N16, BB136N11*
HD114P13, BB065I18, BB071O3, RI046H10, HI002O17, HI041M18
BB019A18, BB097O11, HB119C7, HB123C17, RI035O12, RI062D7
HI142E11, HD063P2, HI124C3, RI012J19, BB194H17*
HB007M06, HD026P3, HI132A22, HD056A9
HB104E22, HB117D08, RI101P15, RI112H4, HI065F13
BB067N14, HB092N14, HD108D13, BB018I20*
New five-dimensional pooling strategy
The pooling strategy employed above included 8.5× genome equivalents of BAC clones. On average, between eight and nine BAC clones are expected to harbor a target sequence in this genome coverage. If, e.g., there would be eight such clones in the super-pools and each would be present in a different 384-well plate, the clones may be in as many as eight plate rows and eight plate columns of the two dimensional grid, resulting in up to 64 row by column intersections. Of these intersections, only eight harbor positive plate-pools; the remaining are false positive. The truly positive plate-pools can only be found by additional PCR as done above. This represents a lot of work if a library is screened with hundreds or thousands of markers.
This additional work would be reduced if screening could be limited to a 1× genome equivalent, each screened separately. In the Eco RI BAC library, the 1× genome equivalent corresponded to about 100 384-well plates.
Numbers of positive clones detected with Illumina oligonucleotide primers in the 1× genome equivalent of the Eco RI Ae. tauschii BAC library and the positive clones detected in contig in the remaining BAC and BiBAC libraries.
Map position (cM)
All positive clones in the contig
No. positive clones in 1× genome equivalent
HD091B17, HB035D2, HB048A19, HD131L18, RI135A13, HI004M3
BB037M12, HB007I22, HB057P16, HB085A14, HI006N2, HD032D6, HI031J11
HB132A7, RI076L24, HI039I15
HD086O22, RI011N13, RI050D20*, RI053E15, HI059D10, HD120B16, HI105L1
BB005K5, BB003G23, BB051C23, BB106M18, RI074C16, HI056I10
BB054M2, RI041O13, RI140B8
HD145O11, HD088L23, RI089E13, HI030D11
HD080D15, HD023E5, RI005I8, HD124N6, HI042G4, HI104G24
HD076J10, HD004P4, HD059D21, RI144L6
BB014B15, BB012C19, HD087J6, RI048C1, RI090E18, HI014F23, HI146N21
RI048D18, BB028N11, RI114F3, RI127A20
HD085I19, HD133F6, RI064D18
HB012E19, HB084C20, RI074P11, HD028J11
RI119I14, RI101I14, RI125I14
The Illumina GoldenGate oligonucleotide assay, originally developed for high-throughput genotyping of SNPs, has been successfully adapted to genotyping of radiation hybrids [15, 16]. It is shown here that the assay can also be used for the genotyping of BAC multidimensional pools. While the query asked in SNP genotyping is which of the two nucleotides is at an SNP site, the query asked in BAC pool genotyping is whether a target sequence is present or absent. In spite of this query difference, the high success rate characteristic for the Illumina GoldenGate platform in genotyping SNPs was also achieved in BAC pool genotyping (87.6%).
It is shown here that BAC pool genotyping is best performed in parallel with SNP genotyping in order to generate well defined clusters for the sequences under investigation. This fact should be considered in the planning phase of a physical mapping project since BAC libraries should ideally be constructed for one of the parents of the segregating population on which the genetic map will be based.
An important asset of Illumina genotyping noted here is the one-to-one relationship between contigs and markers on the genetic map. In this study, 95.3% of markers resulted in anchoring single contigs at single loci on the genetic map. For comparison, of 127 cDNA clones used earlier as probes in hybridization with screening membranes of Ae. tauschii libraries http://wheatdb.ucdavis.edu:8080/wheatdb/index.jsp, 55 (43%) detected BAC clones in single contigs and 72 (57%) detected clones in two or more contigs. Only the former clones could be considered anchored in this case. However, because only a subset of the clones was interrogated with cDNA probes, a portion of the 43% apparent successes was based on a single clone hit. By definition, this can be in only a single contig. If the entire set of five libraries was hybridized with the cDNA clones, the success rate would have been lower than 43%. Similar ambiguities were observed in anchoring soybean HICF contigs by screening multidimensional BAC library pools with SSRs .
The multiplexed Illumina oligonucleotide assays are most time and cost effective if large numbers of markers in large numbers of DNAs are genotyped and if no additional work is needed to identify positive BAC clones. A simple BAC pooling strategy is suggested here that groups the clones into 1× genome equivalents, each treated independently during screening with the Golden Gate assay. This strategy maximizes the likelihood of only a single positive clone present among the BAC pools and minimizes the need for an additional PCR to discriminate between positive and false positive pools if more then single positive BAC is present among the pools. The theoretical probabilities of encountering 0, 1, 2, ... n positive clones during screening of a 1× genome equivalent follows a Poisson distribution with μ = 1. The probability of detecting only a single clone by screening 1× genome equivalents of clones is 36.7%. If the effects of sampling are neglected, the empirical success rate is expected to be lower than the theoretical expectation because of occasional false negatives (failures to detect a clone when it is present in a pool). This was borne out here, as the empirical rate of detecting a single clone by screening 1× genome equivalent BAC clones was 27%. Based on this empirical rate, a minimum of four 1× genome equivalents should be screened to detect at least one positive clone. Four 1× genome equivalents for the Ae. tauschii genome represent 240 pools. Because the representation of a specific sequence in a BAC library depends on the distribution of restriction sites, it is desirable to combine 1× genome equivalents from BAC libraries generated with different restriction endonucleases, or utilize random BAC libraries.
The library screening technique described here is time effective since it takes less than two weeks to screen five hundred DNAs for 1536 loci and only several weeks to process the data. The cost of screening BAC libraries with GoldenGate assays is comparable or only slightly higher that the cost of overgo screening. However, the need for labor to resolve equivocal anchoring is greatly reduced with the GoldenGate assays. A factor that will likely limit the rate with which BAC libraries can be screened and BAC contigs anchored on a genetic map is the availability of sufficient numbers of single-copy SNP loci for OPA design. It is usually sufficient for anchoring of a contig on a genetic map to anchor a single locus per contig. Contig assembly may produce up to 4,000 to 6,000 contigs in large plant genomes, and their anchoring will place high demands on the availability of sufficient numbers of single-copy SNPs. The new DNA sequencing platforms will undoubtedly play a role in overcoming this potential rate limiting step.
While it has been possible to perform BAC fingerprinting and the construction of genetic maps in high-throughput mode, BAC contig anchoring on a genetic map has resisted scaling to high-throughput methods. This limitation is overcome with the Illumina BAC library screening and contig anchoring technique described here. These complementary, high-throughput techniques open the door to efficient construction of physical maps of virtually all eukaryotic genomes.
BAC libraries and HICF fingerprinting
Three libraries constructed in a bacterial artificial chromosome vector (pECBAC1) and two libraries constructed in an Agrobacterium binary vector (pCLD4541) of Ae. tauschii accession AL8/78  were used. Clones of the Eco RI, Hin dIII and Bam HI BAC libraries were designated RI, HD and HI, respectively, and those of the Hin dIII and Bam HI BiBAC libraries were designated HB and BB, respectively. Numbers of clones, coverage, and the average insert sizes are summarized at http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/PhysicalMapping/progress.html. The five libraries comprise a total of 302976 clones, which equal 8.5× Ae. tauschii genome equivalents.
A total of 256942 BAC clones were fingerprinted, BAC fingerprints were automatically edited with the computer program package GenoProfiler  and 199190 BACs clones were used for contig assembly . BAC clones used for assembly represented approximately 5× genome coverage. The total length of contiged DNA represented ca. 85% of the genome.
Clone pooling for the evaluation of library screening with GoldenGate assays
A total of 302976 clones were pooled. Three types of pools were generated: (1) pools of the 384 colonies arrayed within a single plate (plate-pools), (2) two-dimensional (2-D) pools of the plate-pools (super-pools), and (3) 2-D pools of colonies within a single plate (clone-pools).
(1) A plate-pool was generated by inoculating 50 ml of LB broth containing 12.5 mg/L of chloramphenicol (BAC clones) or 12.5 mg/L of tetracycline (BiBAC clones) in a plate devoid of wells (USA Scientific, cat. no. 2977-8510) with the BAC or BiBAC clones from a single 384-well plate with a 384-pin replicator. Cells were grown overnight, sedimented by centrifugation and DNA was isolated using a standard alkaline lysis protocol. A total of 789 plate-pools were produced. To save cell stocks for future applications, 200 μl of cell culture was added to 30 μl of glycerol and cells were stored frozen at -80C.
(2) To generate super-pools, the 789 plate-pool DNAs were arranged in a grid consisting of 27 rows and 30 columns. Equal amounts of DNA of the plate-pools in a row were pooled to produce a row super-pool. Likewise, equal amounts of DNA of the plate-pools in a column were pooled to produce a column super-pool. The 2-D super-pool grid consisted of 57 super-pools; 27 row super-pools (each containing 11520 clones) and 30 column super-pools (each containing 10368 clones).
(3) A total of 40 clone-pools were generated per plate; 16 row-pools and 24 column-pools. A plate containing 16 row reservoirs (Seahorse Bioresearch Company, cat. no. S30034) with 2.0 ml of 2 YT broth each and a plate containing 24 column reservoirs (Seahorse Bioresearch Company, cat. no. S30035) with 1.2 ml of 2 YT broth each, were prepared for each 384-well library plate. The two plates were inoculated with cells from a 384-well plate with a 384-pin replicator. Cells were grown for 20 h at 37C and the 40 clone-pools derived from a single 384-well plate were directly used for PCR screening to identify a well containing a positive clone.
PCR conditions and PCR screening
Super-pools, plate-pools and clone-pools were screened with PCR to find clones harboring a specific Ae. tauschii DNA sequence. PCR was performed in a 20 μl reaction mix containing: 1× PCR buffer (1.5 mM MgCl2 included, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), 250 uM dNTPs (Promega), 0.5 unit of Taq-gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), 10 pmole of forward and reverse primers, and an appropriate amount of template DNA or cells (2 ng for super-pools, 1 ng for individual plate-pools or 1 μl of clone pools). An ABI 9700 thermocycler was used to perform PCRs using the following regime: 94C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94C for 1 min, 56C for 1 min and 72C for 2 min, then hold at 72C for 7 min and finally a 4C stand-by. The presence of PCR amplicon and its size was determined by 1% agarose electrophoresis using 1× TAE buffer.
Fifty-seven Ae. tauschii super-pools were assayed with the Illumina GoldenGate assay. The plate-pools at the intersections of positive super-pool rows and columns were screened with PCR using conserved PCR primers http://probes.pw.usda.gov:8080/snpworld/Search to identify plate-pools that harbored a positive clone. The positive clone within a positive plate-pool was identified by PCR; the positive clone was at the intersection of the positive row and positive column.
Ilumina GoldenGate™ genotyping
Information about genotyping with the Ilumina GoldenGate assay can be found at the Illumina web site http://www.illumina.com/downloads/GOLDENGATEASSAY.pdf. The construction of the genetic map based on Illumina GoldenGate™ SNP genotypes will be described in detail elsewhere. Briefly, 1536 DNA sequences harboring SNPs between Ae. tauschii ssp. strangulata accession AL8/78 (supplied by V. Jaaska, University of Tartu, Estonia) and Ae. tauschii ssp. tauschii accession AS75 (supplied by C. Yen, The Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, China) were downloaded from the wheat SNP database http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/SNP/new/index.shtml and supplied to Illumina Inc. (San Diego, California, USA) for the design of allele- and locus-specific oligonucleotides. Multiplexed oligonucleotides were used to genotype 574 Ae. tauschii F2 plants from the cross AL8/78 × AS75, and the AL8/78 and AS75 parental lines. All genotyping assays were carried out in the DNA Technologies Core of the UC Davis Genome Center.
For the current study, 16 position BeadChip™ arrays were utilized and scanned with the Bead Station 500. Data output was initially analyzed with the Beadstudio v.3.1.14 program using the default parameters. Further manual analysis was carried out to determine if the clustering of the three codominant genotypes was adequate. If it was found inadequate, that SNP was excluded from further work. Of the 1536 targeted SNPs, 153 were not present between the parents or the parents were heterozygous. These were excluded from consideration. Hence 1383 oligonucleotide sets ("SNPs") were studied in total.
To determine the effects of BAC pool DNA concentration on the detection of a positive super-pool and data clustering, the multiplexed GoldenGate assay was performed with DNAs of 3 randomly selected BAC super-pools, using 5 μl of 50, 25, 10, and 1 ng/μl super-pool DNA, and 5 μl of 50 and 25 ng/μl genomic DNAs of AL8/78 and AS75 as positive controls. The 50, 25 and 10 ng/μl super-pool DNA concentrations resulted in similar clustering of data but the 1 ng/μl super-pool DNA concentration showed variable clustering compared to the other three DNA concentrations. It was therefore concluded that BAC super-pool DNA concentrations between 10 and 50 ng/μl were suitable for Ilumina GoldenGate assays and 25 ng/μl was used throughout.
Design of a new, five-dimensional clone pooling strategy
bacterial artificial chromosome
polymerase chain reaction
Oligonucleotide Pool Assay
single nucleotide polymorphism
Authors express their gratitude to Alina. R. Akhunova for preparing BAC pools and Vanessa Rashbrook for performing the Illumina GoldenGate assays. This publication is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation grant No. DBI-0701916.
- Shizuya H, Birren B, Kim UJ, Mancino V, Slepak T, Tachiiri Y, Simon M: Cloning and stable maintenance of 300-kilobase-pair fragments of human DNA in Escherichia coli using an F-factor-based vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 8794-8797. 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8794.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brenner S, Livak KJ: DNA fingerprinting by sampled sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86: 8902-8906. 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8902.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding Y, Johnson MD, Chen WQ, Wong D, Chen YJ, Benson SC, Lam JY, Kim YM, Shizuya H: Five-color-based high-information-content fingerprinting of bacterial artificial chromosome clones using type IIS restriction endonucleases. Genomics. 2001, 74: 142-154. 10.1006/geno.2001.6547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo MC, Thomas C, You FM, Hsiao J, Ouyang S, Buell CR, Malandro M, McGuire PE, Anderson OD, Dvorak J: High-throughput fingerprinting of bacterial artificial chromosomes using the SNaPshot labeling kit and sizing of restriction fragments by capillary electrophoresis. Genomics. 2003, 82: 378-389. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00128-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soderlund C, Longden I: FPC V2.5: User's Manual. Sanger Centre, Technical Report, SC-01-96. 1996, 2.5Google Scholar
- Soderlund C, Longden I, Mott R: FPC: a system for building contigs from restriction fingerprinted clones. CABIOS. 1997, 13: 523-535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soderlund C, Humphray S, Dunham A, French L: Contigs built with fingerprints, markers, and FPCV4.7. Genome Research. 2000, 10: 1772-1787. 10.1101/gr.GR-1375R.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyers BC, Scalabrin S, Morgante M: Mapping and sequencing complex genomes: Let's get physical!. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004, 5: 578-588. 10.1038/nrg1404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruno WJ, Knill E, Balding DJ, Bruce DC, Doggett NA, Sawhill WW, Stallings RL, Whittaker CC, Torney DC: Efficient pooling designs for library screening. Genomics. 1995, 26: 21-30. 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80078-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cai WW, Reneker J, Chow CW, Vaishanav M, Bradley A: An anchored framework BAC map of mouse chromosome 11 assembled using multiplex oligonucleotide hybridization. Genomics. 1998, 54: 387-397. 10.1006/geno.1998.5620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klein PE, Klein RR, Cartinhour SW, Ulanch PE, Dong JM, Obert JA, Morishige DT, Schlueter SD, Childs KL, Ale M, Mullet JE: A high-throughput AFLP-based method for constructing integrated genetic and physical maps: Progress toward a sorghum genome map. Genome Research. 2000, 10: 789-807. 10.1101/gr.10.6.789.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan JB, Oliphant A, Shen R, Kermani BG, Garcia F, Gunderson KL, Hansen M, Steemers F, Butler SL, Deloukas P, et al: Highly parallel SNP genotyping. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 2003, 68: 69-78. 10.1101/sqb.2003.68.69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arumuganathan K, Earle ED: Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Pl Mol Biol Reporter. 1991, 9: 208-218. 10.1007/BF02672069.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo MC, Thomas C, Deal KR, You FM, Anderson OD, Gu YG, Li W, Kuraparthy V, Gill BS, McGuire PE, Dvorak J: Construction of contigs of Ae. tauschii genomic DNA fragments cloned in BAC and BiBAC vectors. Proc 10th Internatl Wheat Genet Symp; 2003, September 1–6 Paestum, Italy. Edited by: Pogna NE, Romano M, Pogna EA, Galterio G. 2003, S.IM.I., Rome, 293-296.Google Scholar
- Mckay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Aerts J, Gill CA, Gao C, Li C, Matukumalli LK, Stothard P, Wang Z, et al: Construction of bovine whole-genome radiation hybrid and linkage maps using high-throughput genotyping. Animal Genetics. 2007, 38: 120-125. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01564.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prasad A, Schiex T, Mckay S, Murdoch B, Wang ZQ, Womack JE, Stothard P, Moore SS: High resolution radiation hybrid maps of bovine chromosomes 19 and 29: comparison with the bovine genome sequence assembly. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8:Google Scholar
- Shoemaker R, Grant D, Olson T, Warren WC, Wing R, Cregan P, Joseph B, Futrell-Griggs M, Nelson W, Davito J, et al: Microsatellite Discovery from BAC End Sequences and Genetic Mapping to Anchor the Soybean Physical and Genetic Maps. Genome. 2008, 51: 294-302. 10.1139/G08-010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu Z, Deal KR, Li W, Covaleda L, Chang Y-L, Dvorak J, Luo M-C, Gill BS, Anderson OD, Zhang HB: Construction and characterization of five large-insert BAC and BIBAC libraries of Aegilops tauschii, the diploid donor of the wheat D genome. 10th Intern Plant and Animal Genome Conference; San Diego, U.S.A. Edited by: Heller SR. 2002, Scherago Internatl. Inc, 101-Google Scholar
- You FM, Luo MC, Gu YQ, Lazo GR, Deal K, Dvorak J, Anderson OD: GenoProfiler: batch processing of high-throughput capillary fingerprinting data. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 240-242. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.