Skip to main content

Table 1 Presence of the 15 fly promoter motifs in the three promoter classes

From: Complex organizational structure of the genome revealed by genome-wide analysis of single and alternative promoters in Drosophila melanogaster

 

Occurrence percentagea

p valueb

Motif

UPs

FAPs

DAPs

UPs vs. FAPs

UPs vs. DAPs

FAPs vs. DAPs

TATA/DMp1

5.77

1.13

0.95

9.73e-24

5.21e-36

ns

INR/DMp2

10.22

11.97

12.58

ns

3.36e-04

ns

INR1/DMp3

0.52

1.43

0.74

4.54e-05

ns

ns

DPE/DMp4

0.69

0.92

1.02

ns

ns

ns

DPE1/DMp5

0.39

1.07

0.81

3.32e-04

ns

ns

DMv1

1.56

2.46

0.70

ns

2.31e-04

6.23e-07

DMv2

0.85

0.87

0

ns

7.26e-10

2.17e-07

DMv3

3.17

3.48

1.65

ns

4.46e-06

6.86e-05

DMv4

3.39

5.58

1.23

7.10e-06

2.69e-11

5.58e-18

DMv5

1.41

0.97

0.88

ns

ns

ns

GAGA/NDM1

1.23

2.86

4.87

4.14e-07

2.68e-29

4.55e-04

NDM2

2.92

4.76

6.03

4.87e-05

3.87e-14

ns

NDM3

1.11

0.97

0

ns

8.40e-13

3.55e-08

DRE/NDM4

8.34

14.22

4.59

3.16e-15

1.04e-12

2.35e-31

E-box/NDM5

5.44

4.45

0

ns

2.73e-62

3.07e-35

Nonec

61.81

54.78

69.90

5.27e-09

4.73e-16

1.61e-26

  1. apercentage of the promoters in a class having the specific motif.
  2. bcalculated using Fisher's exact test. Holm's method was used for multiple hypothesis testing. ns, not significant.
  3. cpercentage of promoters without any known motifs.
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us