Skip to main content

Table 3 Variability of recombination fraction (θ) for the UMNP891-UMNP93 interval among INRA F1 female individuals, and among groups of females grouped according to their maternal and paternal haplotypes1.

From: Recombinational landscape of porcine X chromosome and individual variation in female meiotic recombination associated with haplotypes of Chinese pigs

No. of sub-family2

F1 sows

Paternal haplo-type

Maternal haplo-type

N

θ

F1 maternal haplo-type

N

θ

F1 paternal haplo-type

N

θ

1

910002

2413

1122

76

0.053 3

1122

243

0.103

2413

574

0,059

 

910009

2413

1122

72

0.139

1222

526

0.055

5113

235

0,055

 

910010

2413

1122

95

0.116

3221

38

0.105

5413

141

0,043

 

910013

2413

4311

55

0

4311

138

0.007

6323

78

0,090

2

910014

5113

1222

83

0.096

5221

83

0.012

   
 

910016

5113

3221

38

0.105

      
 

910020

5113

1222

68

0.015

      

3

910018

5113

4311

46

0

      

4

910069

2413

1222

62

0.032

      
 

910071

2413

1222

68

0.044

      
 

910072

2413

1222

63

0.048

      
 

910074

2413

5221

83

0.012

      

5

910084

6323

1222

51

0.118

      
 

910086

6323

1222

27

0.037

      

6

910095

5413

1222

62

0.048

      
 

910096

5413

1222

42

0.048

      
 

910097

5413

4311

37

0.027

      

Kosambi distance (cM)

    

5.86

  

5.86

  

5.86

Morton test

    

39.24

  

23.61

  

1.96

Df

    

16

  

4

  

3

P value

    

0.0010

  

0.0001

  

0.5800

  1. 1In the region UMNP891-UMNP93, 4 microsatellite markers (UMNP891, MCSE347J6, SW1522, UMNP93) and 7 SNPs were genotyped. For simplicity, we indicated the haplotypes with only microsatellites alleles because they reveal all individual haplotypes formed by all markers analysed on these animals.
  2. 2Each sub-family consists of F1 full-sisters.
  3. 3The θ of the F1 full-sisters within the first subfamily are highlighted in bold because they showed the largest difference in θ (P = 0.0026).