Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of QTLs detected in the RIL population derived from a EP39 × EP42 evaluated in two environments under artificial infestation with corn borer eggs.

From: QTL mapping for Mediterranean corn borer resistance in European flint germplasm using recombinant inbred lines

       

Cross validation âTS.ESd

QTL bina

Confidence interval

LOD score

Flanking markers

R2adj

p b

âc

Median

Percentile (10, 90)

Frequency (%)

P

Stalk tunnel length (cm)

1.02

4-30

4.25

bnlg1014

umc1222

11.6

 

-2.83

-2.85

(-3.33, -2.42)

91.9

 

3.05

71-98

3.87

umc1174

umc1539

9.6

 

2.40

2.47

(2.14, 3.01)

78.7

 

8.05

4-21

3.46

umc1984

umc1858

9.6

 

2.57

2.63

(2.22, 3.22)

77.7

 

Final fit

   

33.2

    

8.7

Relative stalk tunnel length

8.05

9-21

4.91

umc1984

umc1858

15.0

 

0.02

0.02

(0.018, 0.027)

65.0

 

Final fit

   

28.4

    

0.0

Cob damage (1-9 scale) e

1.12

297-301

2.54

umc1725

umc1797

7.5

 

0.29

0.33

(0.29, 0.37)

29.0

 

Final fit

   

7.0

    

0.0

Silking (days)

1.03

51-70

3.22

umc1003

phi001

9.5

 

-0.94

-0.98

(-1.19, -0.85)

34.9

 

2.08

148-196

3.48

phi127

bnlg1520

11.2

 

2.11

2.19

(1.86, 2.63)

50.4

 

4.04

64-86

4.87

umc1963

umc1142

13.7

 

1.58

1.43

(1.19, 1.71)

55.3

 

4.06

124-138

2.80

umc1329

umc1847

8.2

 

-0.87

-1.07

(-1.29, -0.91)

59.7

 

8.05

22-30

10.8

umc1858

bnlg1812

29.4

 

-1.62

-1.41

(-1.64, -1.13)

92.1

 

9.05

61-85

5.49

umc1492

bnlg1812

15.9

 

1.35

1.27

(1.06, 1.55)

63.3

 

Final fit

   

45.5

    

18.9

Plant height (cm)

3.05

71-98

5.97

umc1174

umc1539

16.6

 

5.04

5.27

(4.18, 6.94)

98.4

 

Final fit

   

16.1

    

12.8

Grain humidity (%)

3.05

71-101

5.60

umc1539

bnlg197

16.0

 

0.63

0.66

(0.51, 0.89)

95.8

 

Final fit

   

11.7

    

0.7

Yield (t ha -1 )

4.08

158-192

2.44

umc1667

umc1573

7.3

 

0.21

0.22

(0.18, 0.26)

36.5

 

5.05

93-128

2.85

umc1591

umc1019

8.5

 

-0.18

-0.22

(-0.28, -0.19)

44.6

 

8.05

10-30

3.46

umc1858

bnlg1821

10.3

 

0.23

0.23

(0.20, 0.28)

39.8

 

8.08

55-66

4.07

umc1055

umc1384

12.5

 

0.25

0.24

(0.20, 0.32)

51.4

 

Final fit

   

22.5

    

9.06

  1. a Bin locations are designed by an X.Y code, where X is the linkage group containing the Bin and Y is the location of the Bin within the linkage group (Gardiner et al., 1993).
  2. b Proportion of the genotypic variance explained by detected QTL, adjusted for QTL × Environment interaction, and calculated using the whole data set.
  3. c Additive effects calculated in the whole data set. Positive additive effects indicate that the EP42 allele increases the value of the trait.
  4. d Median and percentiles of the additive effects, frequency of QTL detection and proportion of the genotypic variance explained by detected QTL alculated in 200 cross-validation runs.
  5. e Cob damage was estimated on a 9 point scale (9 = without injury; 1 = wholly damaged)