Open Access

The expression of genes coding for distinct types of glycine-rich proteins varies according to the biology of three metastriate ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Amblyomma cajennense

  • Sandra R Maruyama1,
  • Elen Anatriello1,
  • Jennifer M Anderson2,
  • José M Ribeiro2,
  • Lucinda G Brandão1, 7,
  • Jesus G Valenzuela2,
  • Beatriz R Ferreira3,
  • Gustavo R Garcia1,
  • Matias PJ Szabó4,
  • Sonal Patel5,
  • Richard Bishop5 and
  • Isabel KF de Miranda-Santos1, 6Email author
BMC Genomics201011:363

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-363

Received: 14 December 2009

Accepted: 8 June 2010

Published: 8 June 2010

Abstract

Background

Ticks secrete a cement cone composed of many salivary proteins, some of which are rich in the amino acid glycine in order to attach to their hosts' skin. Glycine-rich proteins (GRPs) are a large family of heterogeneous proteins that have different functions and features; noteworthy are their adhesive and tensile characteristics. These properties may be essential for successful attachment of the metastriate ticks to the host and the prolonged feeding necessary for engorgement. In this work, we analyzed Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) similar to GRPs from cDNA libraries constructed from salivary glands of adult female ticks representing three hard, metastriate species in order to verify if their expression correlated with biological differences such as the numbers of hosts ticks feed on during their parasitic life cycle, whether one (monoxenous parasite) or two or more (heteroxenous parasite), and the anatomy of their mouthparts, whether short (Brevirostrata) or long (Longirostrata). These ticks were the monoxenous Brevirostrata tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, a heteroxenous Brevirostrata tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, and a heteroxenous Longirostrata tick, Amblyomma cajennense. To further investigate this relationship, we conducted phylogenetic analyses using sequences of GRPs from these ticks as well as from other species of Brevirostrata and Longirostrata ticks.

Results

cDNA libraries from salivary glands of the monoxenous tick, R. microplus, contained more contigs of glycine-rich proteins than the two representatives of heteroxenous ticks, R. sanguineus and A. cajennense (33 versus, respectively, 16 and 11). Transcripts of ESTs encoding GRPs were significantly more numerous in the salivary glands of the two Brevirostrata species when compared to the number of transcripts in the Longirostrata tick. The salivary gland libraries from Brevirostrata ticks contained numerous contigs significantly similar to silks of true spiders (17 and 8 in, respectively, R. microplus and R. sanguineus), whereas the Longirostrata tick contained only 4 contigs. The phylogenetic analyses of GRPs from various species of ticks showed that distinct clades encoding proteins with different biochemical properties are represented among species according to their biology.

Conclusions

We found that different species of ticks rely on different types and amounts of GRPs in order to attach and feed on their hosts. Metastriate ticks with short mouthparts express more transcripts of GRPs than a tick with long mouthparts and the tick that feeds on a single host during its life cycle contain a greater variety of these proteins than ticks that feed on several hosts.

Background

In order to acquire a blood meal, Ixodid (hard) ticks secrete diverse salivary proteins that inhibit their hosts' defense mechanisms and permit hematophagy to proceed for many days [1]. But ticks must first attach to the skin of their hosts and attachment must be effective for the duration of the tick's blood meal. Ixodid ticks are classified by the number of different hosts they feed on during the parasitic phase of their life cycle; one host, two hosts or three hosts. Ticks that complete the entire parasitic cycle on one host are monoxenous parasites, whereas tick that feed on two or more different hosts with an interval off the host between the feeds are heteroxenous. Success of attachment on one or more hosts depends, among other factors, on the salivary proteins that are believed to form cement cones. These structures fix tick mouthparts to the host's skin and possibly disguise and/or lubricate them [2]. The architecture of the cement cone depends on the both the depth of penetration of the tick's hypostome into the host's skin and the degree to which cement encases the hypostome. The cattle tick, Rhipicepahalus microplus, and the brown dog tick, R. sanguineus, are classified as Brevirostrata ticks because their mouthparts are short and barely penetrate into the epidermis of theirs hosts. These parts are therefore assisted by a wide cement cone that reaches more deeply into this layer of skin and also extrudes the epidermis [3]. Consequently, the cement cone of Brevirostrata ticks tends to be wide and deep, completely surrounding the hypostome and extruding above the epidermis of the host skin [4]. Histological cross-sections of an adult R. sanguineus attached to a dog clearly illustrate the superficial penetration of the hyposotome and the extensive cement cone which appears to "glue" the mouthparts in place [5]. R. microplus is a monoxenous tick and its life cycle, spent on a single host, is of approximately 21 days; R. sanguineus is a heteroxenous tick. Conversely, Amblyomma cajennense, also a heteroxenous parasite, is a Longirostrata tick with its long hypostome fully penetrating well into its host's dermis and encased by a narrow cement cone [3]. Several salivary proteins present in the tick's cement cone are rich in glycine (glycine-rich proteins, GRPs) [3, 6, 7]. GRPs are abundant in nature and constitute a large family of heterogeneous proteins enriched in glycine residues by various proportions, occupying from 20% to 70% of the total amino acid residues of the protein. GRPs can be classified into several groups based on their molecular structure [8, 9].

During the course of our studies of the transcriptome of salivary glands from R. microplus, R. sanguineus and A. cajennense we annotated different types of GRPs and observed that these contigs represent from 3 to over 6% of the total number, higher than any other class of protein. Furthermore, we observed that the distribution and abundance of the contigs and the number of transcripts that form them differed according to the species. Since proteins isolated from the cement cone are rich in glycine and this structure may have a role in attachment and since the various species of ticks have different requirements for attachment, herein we perform initial tests of the hypothesis that there are not only anatomical, but also chemical differences between the cement cones produced by these three species of ticks. These differences could vary according to their biology, such as whether they infest one or more hosts and whether anatomy of their mouthparts comprises short or long hypostomes.

We constructed three non-normalized, PCR-based cDNA libraries from the salivary glands of female R. sanguineus, R. microplus and A. cajennense and analyzed the expressed sequence tags (ESTs) obtained using customized bioinformatics software. We observed that the expression of contigs and their transcripts coding for glycine-rich proteins differed in quantity as well in diversity, depending on the species of the tick. In order to further test this hypothesis we also performed a phylogenetic analysis using the sequences from our work as well as of publicly available sequences from all the available sialomes of other species of heteroxenous and Longirostrata or Brevistrata ticks that have been annotated as GRPs.

Results and Discussion

Library Construction

A total of 1440 plaque phages were sequenced from each of the three salivary gland libraries to generate 5' Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs). A total of approximately 2,900 high quality sequences, including 1,152 from the salivary glands of female R. microplus (SGFRm), 824 from salivary glands of female R. sanguineus (SGFRs) and 929 from salivary glands of female A. cajennense (SGFAc). Redundant sequences were clustered into related groups using BLASTN and then assembled into contiguous sequences yielding 1,406 unique contigs of which 245 were derived from two or more ESTs (transcripts) and 1,165 were derived from a single EST (singleton). As seen in Table 1, GRPs are abundantly expressed in the salivary glands, ranging from 3- 6% of the total contigs sequenced from these libraries. The SGFRm library contained more ESTs similar to genes coding for GRPs than the other two libraries. The SGFRm and SGFRs libraries exhibit a similar number of ESTs for GRPs (57 and 47 ESTs, respectively), but comparing the number of unique contigs similar to GRPs, SGFRm contained almost double the number (n = 33) of unique contigs as SGFRs (n = 16) and triple that of SGFAc (n = 11). This finding shows that saliva of R. microplus, a Brevirostrata, one-host tick, contains twice as many different GRPs than the other two species of ticks examined herein, one a Brevirostrata, three host tick, the other a Longirostrata, three host tick. The SGFAc library contained approximately the same proportion of unique GRP contigs as the SGFRs library, however these are formed by fewer ESTs (23) relative to the other two libraries (57 and 47 ESTs, from SGFRm and SGFRs, respectively).
Table 1

Characteristics cDNA libraries constructed using salivary glands (SG) dissected from three feeding female Ixodid ticks: Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Rs), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Rm) a nd Amblyomma cajennense (Ac).

Library

ESTs

Contigs

ESTs/Transcripts

ESTs encoding GRPs

Contigs of GRPs

Average n° GRP ESTs/Contig of GRP

SGFRm

1,152

533

2.16

57 (4.94)a

33 (6.19)a

1.72

SGFRs

874

455

1.92

47 (5.37)a

16 (3.51)a

2.93

SGFAc

929

418

2.22

23 (2.90)a

11 (3.82)a

2.09

a Percent of total

Comparison of library-derived glycine rich proteins to published and custom databases

Comparsion of the contigs from the three libraries with a customized database of all Arachnida proteins found in Genbank revealed that 60 contigs had similarities with 21 different types of GRP, based on published annotated sequences (Table 2). Contigs were considered to encode GRPs if the translated amino acid sequence contained a glycine content of at least 20% (with three exceptions among the 60 unique contigs, which contained 11 and 17% glycine). The most abundant GRP (41 total ESTs) found among all three libraries was a 506 amino acid protein containing 25% glycine obtained from R. haemaphysaloides and annotated as "unknown function". Flagelliform silk proteins (~50% glycine), identified from various spider species, was the second most abundant GRP found among the three libraries (n = 23 ESTs). Proteins annotated as cement and cement-like proteins from H. longicornis, I. scapularis and R. appendiculatus were also commonly observed among the three libraries (Table 2).
Table 2

Description of matches with glycine-rich proteins present in the Arachnida protein database for transcripts from A. cajennense, R. sanguineus and R. microplus

Best Match to Arachnida Database

Accession number of Best Match

Size (amino acid)

% Glycine of Best match

Library

Transcript name (Number of ESTs)

% Glycine in respective transcript*

E-value of Match

cement-like antigen [H. longicornis]

gi 116642505

179

34,63

SGFAc

Ac147 (1)

28,81

9E-005

    

SGFRs

Rs345 (1)

21,78

5E-009

    

SGFRm

Rm62 (1)

21,11

5E-009

    

SGFRm

Rm115 (2)

22,91

1E-011

    

SGFRm

Rm 519 (1)

23,37

3E-007

    

SGFRm

Rm61 (3)

32,2

1E-020

cement-like antigen [H. longicornis]

gi 125597020

217

38,7

SGFRm

Rm265 (1)

22,22

1E-009

    

SGFRm

Rm71 (1)

41,32

1E-017

    

SGFRm

Rm470 (1)

31,79

 

NPL-2 [I. pacificus]

gi 51011404

78

38,46

SGFRm

Rm234 (1)

21,35

1E-006

putative cement protein [I. scapularis]

gi 50363174

119

50,42

SGFRm

Rm388 (1)

20,43

5E-007

putative cement protein RIM36 [R. appendiculatus]

gi 21885262

334

24,55

SGFAc

Ac52 (2)

20,57

8E-024

    

SGFRm

Rm77 (1)

25,82

2E-009

salivary gland-associated protein 64P [R. appendiculatus]

gi 20069012

154

29,22

SGFAc

Ac109 (1)

20

4E-012

    

SGFRs

Rs12 (13)

30,43

1E-025

Unknown [R.haemaphysaloides]

gi 45479213

506

25,29

SGFAc

Ac9 (10)

24,8

2E-028

    

SGFRs

Rs17 (5)

22,05

1E-149

    

SGFRs

Rs19 (1)

20,31

7E-062

    

SGFRs

Rs20 (1)

21,1

3E-082

    

SGFRs

Rs156 (1)

30,37

1E-020

    

SGFRs

Rs402 (1)

25,77

2E-028

    

SGFRs

Rs428 (1)

30,72

2E-028

    

SGFRm

Rm29 (11)

36,94

3E-060

    

SGFRm

Rm70 (2)

31,19

2E-024

    

SGFRm

Rm30 (1)

30,51

2E-020

    

SGFRm

Rm31 (1)

26,08

3E-022

    

SGFRm

Rm67 (3)

20,38

3E-074

    

SGFRm

Rm85 (2)

11,34

3E-025

    

SGFRm

Rm479 (1)

23,76

4E-010

acanthoscurrin 1 precursor [A. gomesiana]

gi 27524417

156

62,17

SGFAc

Ac354 (1)

42,85

3E-014

    

SGFRs

Rs26 (6)

31,95

2E-019

flagelliform silk protein [A. trifasciata]

gi 13561982

1.002

56,78

SGFAc

Ac233 (1)

30,47

3E-005

    

SGFRm

Rm259 (1)

22,22

1E-005

flagelliform silk protein [A. trifasciata]

gi 13561980

651

47,31

SGFRm

Rm533 (1)

30,91

1E-017

flagelliform silk protein [N.clavipes]

gi 2833647

871

46,84

SGFRs

Rs54 (3)

33,14

9E-020

    

SGFRm

Rm35 (1)

20,68

2E-011

    

SGFRm

Rm36 (1)

22,53

8E-010

    

SGFRm

Rm32 (3)

25

4E-018

flagelliform silk protein [N.clavipes]

gi 7106224

2.249

54,37

SGFRs

Rs130 (1)

21,42

4E-004

    

SGFRm

Rm34 (3)

25,54

7E-012

    

SGFRm

Rm129 (2)

26,82

5E-012

flagelliform silk protein [N. madagascariensis]

gi 7106228

1.884

51,8

SGFRm

Rm33 (2)

27,48

3E-021

    

SGFRm

Rm37 (1)

21,64

7E-011

flagelliform silk protein [N. madagascariensis]

gi 7106229

626

47,12

SGFRm

Rm76 (2)

17,22

7E-008

    

SGFRm

Rm197 (1)

25

2E-004

fibroin 2 [D. spinosa]

gi 89113990

623

35,63

SGFRs

Rs29 (5)

23,92

6E-011

    

SGFRm

Rm433 (1)

23,8

1E-005

major ampullate spidroin 1 [L. hesperus]

gi 89276817

1.065

41,22

SGFRm

Rm324 (1)

48,38

1E-019

major ampullate dragline silk protein-2 [Araneus ventricosus]

gi 27228959

429

27,03

SGFAc

Ac13 (3)

32,46

3E-009

major ampullate spidroin 2-1 [K. hibernalis]

gi 47007938

185

47,02

SGFAc

Ac15 (1)

35,92

2E-013

    

SGFRm

Rm381 (1)

22,97

7E-017

    

SGFRm

Rm418 (1)

21

9E-008

major ampullate spidroin 2-2 [K. hibernalis]

gi 47007952

214

49,53

SGFAc

Ac14 (1)

32,33

3E-025

     

Ac17 (1)

32,09

2E-010

     

Ac16 (1)

31,96

1E-014

    

SGFRs

Rs38 (1)

17,35

1E-010

    

SGFRs

Rs37 (3)

31,09

6E-018

    

SGFRs

Rs70 (2)

31,65

1E-022

spidroin 1 [N. clavipes]

gi 2911274

544

40,25

SGFRs

Rs84 (2)

45,23

2E-004

SPD1_NEPCL Spidroin-1 [Dragline silk fibroin 1]

gi 1174414

747

42,3

SGFRm

Rm185 (1)

26,25

4E-005

* Computation of glycine content was calculated based on translated consensus sequence

Comparing the BLAST results of the three libraries shows that, with 33 contigs representing 57 ESTs, R. microplus contained the most abundant contigs homologous to GRPs as compared to 11 contigs from A. cajennenes and 16 contigs from R. sanguineus. Salivary glands from R. microplus also contained the greatest variety of GRP with contigs homologous to 11 different GRPs whereas A. cajennense and R. sanguineus salivary glands contained 9 and 8 different GRPs, respectively (Table 2).

Differential expression of GRPs in Brevirostrata and Longistrata, and monoxenous and heteroxenous ticks

As reported above, the distribution of GRPs in three Ixodid ticks differed according to the species. In order to better display this distribution, Figure 1 shows a Venn diagram of the numbers of GRP ESTs and types of GRPs (numbers in parentheses) found in common among the three species of ticks studied herein. Figure 1 also shows the number of GRP ESTs and types of GRPs that are unique to each species. More GRP ESTs are expressed uniquely in the salivary glands of females of R. microplus (14 versus 3 and 2 ESTs for, respectively A. cajannense and R. sanguineus). These transcripts represented 8 unique types of GRPs in R. microplus, whereas R. sanguineus and A. cajannense each presented only unique 1 type of GRP. On the other hand, only two GRPs (from a total of 21 types) were common to all three species of ticks and were represented by 50 ESTs (Figure 1 and Table 2). We also analyzed the distribution of 21 types of GRPs among the three libraries. As shown in Figure 1, R. microplus contained almost twice as many types of GRPs than R. sanguineus or A. cajennense [SGFRm: 16 types of GRPs; SGFRs and SGFAc: 9 types of GRPs each (see numbers in parentheses)]; R. microplus contains twice the amount of contigs encoding GRPs (SGFRm, SGFRs and SGFAc contained 33, 16 and 11 contigs of GRPs, respectively).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-11-363/MediaObjects/12864_2009_Article_2957_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Venn diagram showing the distribution of glycine rich protein (GRP) ESTs among three species of hard ticks, A. cajennense, R. sanguineus and R. microplus. Numbers in parentheses represent types of GRP according to the classification in Table 2.

A protein previously described in Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides haemaphysaloides (gi 45479213), annotated as of "unknown function", represented the class of GRP with which the majority of ESTs in the 3 libraries presented similarity (Table 2). Over half of these transcripts derived from the library from R. microplus salivary glands (21 from SGFRm, 10 from SGFRs and 10 from SGFAc). Interestingly, the SGFRm library does not present any EST with similarity to salivary gland-associated protein 64P from Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks (gi 20069012), at least on the first 10 best hits, contrary to what was found for SGFRs and SGFAc. 64P is a GRP of interest because it is a potentially protective antigen for some species of host [7, 10]. The amino acid sequence of the 64P secreted salivary protein is similar to epidermal/dermal keratin and collagen proteins, which are mammalian structural proteins of the skin [8, 11], and salivary homologues are present in several species of ticks [7].

As noted above, the annotation of the three cDNA libraries using the BLAST results permitted us to observe that the libraries and some contigs contained fewer or more transcripts and sequences coding for proteins similar to GRPs than expected from a random distribution, as evaluated with the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Table 3 presents the distribution of all transcripts coding for the GRPs observed among the three salivary gland libraries from females of the tick species studied herein, R. microplus, R. sanguineus and A. cajennense. SGFRm and SGFRs libraries contain significantly (P = 0.006 and P = 0.003, respectively; χ2 test) more transcripts coding for all types of GRPs than the SGFAc library; transcripts for GRPs were equally represented in the SGFRm and SGFRs libraries (P = 0.821, χ2 test). These results show that for Brevirostrata ticks, R. microplus and R. sanguineus, the expression in salivary glands of all types of GRPs was significantly higher than in those of a Longirostrata tick (A. cajennense). The R. microplus salivary gland library contained more types and transcripts of proteins similar to GRPs than the SGFRs, but the difference in the proportions of the GRPs did not quite reach significance with the present depth of sequencing (P = 0.072, χ2 test; Table 3). Nevertheless, these results show that a Brevirostrata, monoxenous tick, which remains attached to the same host for at least three weeks, relies on a greater variety of GRPs than the Brevirostrata heteroxenous tick examined in this study. On the other hand, the library from R. microplus contained significantly (P = 0.015, χ2 test) more transcripts of GRPs than the library from the salivary glands of the Longirostrata, heteroxenous tick, A. cajennense (Table 3). This finding suggests that in order to feed on a single host for up to three weeks, monoxenous ticks with short mouthparts must be equipped to deal with a larger repertoire of the host's local homeostatic mechanisms. It is noteworthy that by the time the monoxenous tick R. microplus completes its blood meal its host will have mounted an adaptive immune response. The greater diversity of GRPs in this species may reflect a form of antigenic variation.
Table 3

Differential Abundance of Transcripts and Diversity of Types of GRPs in Salivary Gland Libraries from females of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus SGFRm), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (SGFRs)and Amblyomma cajennense (SGFAc)

Representation of Transcripts Coding for GRPs

Library

N° of ESTs

Library

N° of ESTs

P value*

  

Observed

Expected

 

Observed

Expected

 

SGFRm

57

59.620

SGFRs

47

45.380

P = 0.821

SGFRm

57

45.333

SGFAc

23

35.667

P = 0.006

SGFRs

47

34.421

SGFAc

23

35.579

P = 0.003

Representation of Transcripts Coding for GRPs

Library

N° clusters

Library

N° clusters

P value*

  

Observed

Expected

 

Observed

Expected

 

SGFRm

33

27.312

SGFRs

16

22.688

P = 0.072

SGFRm

33

25.617

SGFAc

11

19.383

P = 0.015

SGFRs

16

14.130

SGFAc

11

12.870

P = 0.592

Representation of the Most Abundant Transcripts Coding for Specific Types of GRPs

Best match to NR protein database

Library

N° of ESTs

Library

N° of ESTs

P value

  

Observed

Expected

 

Observed

Expected

 

gi|45479213|unknown Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides

SGFRm

21

17.678

SGFRs

10

13.322

P = 0.372

 

SGFRm

21

17.217

SGFAc

10

13.783

P = 0.232

Acanthoscurrin

SGFRs

6

3,301

SGFAc

1

3,699

P = 0.424

64P

SGFRs

13

9.432

SGFAc

1

4.568

P = 0.002

Silk-like proteins from true spiders

SGFRm

23

22,749

SGFRs

17

17,251

P = 0.936

 

SGFRm

23

17,247

SGFAc

8

13,753

P = 0.056

 

SGFRs

17

12,185

SGFAc

8

12,815

P = 0.396

*Chi-square test for representation of the glycine-rich proteins distributed in the three cDNA libraries.

We also observed that the distribution of ESTs within some contigs was greater in a given species of tick. Contig 29 from SGFRm, coding for a protein similar to an "unknown" protein from R. h. haemaphysaloides ticks (Genbank accession: gi 45479213), was the most abundant transcript among the three libraries and the most abundant in the SGFRm library, with 21 ESTs versus 10 ESTs in both the SGFRs and SGFAc libraries, however it was not differentially represented among the three ticks (Table 3). A contig coding for a GRP similar to "acanthoscurrin 1 precursor" from Acanthoscurria gomesiana spiders (Genbank accession gi 27524417) was also not significantly differentially represented (Table 3), although SGFRs contains 6 ESTs and SGFAc has just 1 EST. However, the GRP similar to "salivary gland-associated protein 64P" from R. appendiculatus (a Brevirostrata, heteroxenous tick), regarded as a cement protein, was significantly more expressed in salivary glands of female R. sanguineus than in those of A. cajennense (P = 0.001, χ2 test). This result suggests that females of a Brevirostrata, heteroxenous tick rely more on this protein to attach and feed on their last host than Longirostrata, heteroxenous ticks. Finally, regarding the nature of similarities, it was interesting to note that R. microplus, R. sanguineus and A. cajennense expressed, respectively, 23, 17 and 8 transcripts that were similar to silks of true spiders (Araneomorphae; Table 2), however the differences in distribution did not reach statistical significance.

Our results do not preclude the fact that some of the GRPs for which transcripts were not detected in a given species may indeed be present in salivary glands as preformed proteins stored in granules. Nevertheless, this still represents a biological difference involving GRPs that is reflected in the transcription profile. On the other hand, previous work [12] clearly shows that tick salivary glands are not completely "pre-loaded" and ready to secrete when a tick attaches to a host. Indeed, the expression of at least 27 genes encoding secreted proteins increases in salivary glands of female Ixodes scapularis ticks after attachment to their host and, interestingly, almost a third (eight) of these encode GRPs. Furthermore, transcripts for GRPs were not observed in salivary glands from unfed females. Kaufman [13] showed that fluid secretion by salivary glands was similar in the females of several species of Ixodidae ticks, including Brevirostrata and Longirostratata ticks suggesting that salivation is similar throughout the Ixodid family [13], i.e., if the presence of 'pre-loaded' granules has a determinant role in salivation, that work would have found differences for distinct tick species, mainly at the early phases of salivation.

Besides analyses performed with the NCBI database, we used the gene ontology (GO) database to categorize the GRP contigs from individual libraries. Results must be interpreted with caution since the GRP sequences are of low complexity and GO categories are still not entirely comprehensive for all biological functions. Nevertheless, differences were seen among the three species of ticks. The GRP transcripts were categorized into GO terms for nine biological processes (Additional file 1); the term "epidermis development" was most frequently assigned to transcripts from heteroxenous ticks (SGFRs with 70.2% of the terms and SGFAc with 26.1% versus 12.1% of terms for SGFRs). Glycine-rich proteins related to epidermal development have also been found in others arthropods, such as the silkworm Bombix mori [14]. Interestingly terms related to development of epidermis were the most abundant category of all, assigned to SGFRs (70.2%), a library made from a heteroxenous, Brevirostrata tick. Over half (52.2%) of the terms assigned for SGFAc fell into the category "unknown", reflecting the fact that little information is available about biological characteristics of saliva from A. cajennense ticks.

Phylogenetic analyses of Glycine-rich proteins

Silk-like proteins

Phylogenetic analysis of GRP contigs from the three ticks studied herein shows 3 distinct clades (numbered 1-3) as displayed in Figure 2. Two of them contain a group of contigs that presented similarities with silk proteins of spiders. One was similar to a flagelliform silk protein, (FSP; clade 1), which is a viscous, glue-like silk from orb-weaving spiders of the Nephila genus; another was similar to major ampullate spidroin (Masp; clade 2) from Kukulcania hibern alis, a cribellate (i.e., it does not produce glue-like adhesive webbing), non-orb-weaving spider. Interestingly, these clades are the most defined in the dendogram, as may be observed through the proximity among members of these clades. Another feature of clades 1 and 2 is that each is formed by contigs from a single species of tick: clade 2 presented contigs only from A. cajennense and clade 1 contained contigs only from R. microplus, probably for this reason the clades showed better proximity among the members. This finding is compatible with our hypothesis that metastriate ticks presenting with different biological characteristics rely on different types of GRPs. Noteworthy is the fact FSP is an elastic and glue -like adhesive silk [15], a characteristic which could be important for a Brevirostrata monoxenous tick. The third distinct clade has showed similarity with an unknown protein (UK) from R. haemaphysaloides and contains contigs from only Brevirostrata ticks, i.e., R. microplus and R. sanguineus, again a finding that is compatible with our hypothesis. Futhermore, although distinct clades were not formed by the remaining GRP contigs, we noted that contigs segregated into two different patterns: those which presented matches with spider silk proteins (filled symbols) are concentrated in clades that are distant from those that have similarities with cement-like proteins of ticks (open symbols), with the exception of contigs Rs54, Rm388 and Ac52. This finding suggests that these two "major types" of GRPs (silks versus cements) may have different roles during attachment ticks on the host. The similarities found with spider GRPs were also with Masps and FSPs, albeit from different genera of spiders. Interestingly, A. cajennense was represented only twice among the cement-like (open symbol) contigs, while two other cement-like contigs from this species grouped with spider silk-like contigs.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-11-363/MediaObjects/12864_2009_Article_2957_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Dendogram of Glycine-rich proteins of A. cajennense, R. sanguineus and R. microplus ticks. The protein sequences were aligned by the Clustal X program (Thompson et al., 1997), and the dendrogram was calculated using the Mega package (Kumar et al., 2004) after 10,000 bootstraps with the neighbor joining (NJ) algorithm. The bar at the bottom represents 20% amino acid substitution. The Roman numerals in the figure indicate the three most distinct clades. Filled symbols are transcripts that presented matches with spider silk proteins and empty symbols are transcripts that displayed matches with cement-like proteins of ticks in Arachnida database (from NCBI). Circle: R. microplus; square: R. sanguineus; triangle: A. cajennense. All similarities (best match against Arachnida database) of transcripts in dendrogram can be observed in Table 2.

A multiple alignment analyses of the three distinct clades (clades 1-3 from Figure 2) showed the level of conservation among contigs, as can be observed in Figure 3. Clade 1, formed by contigs from SGFRm showed the greatest degree of conservation. Sequence alignment of Rm34 and Rm37 show an identity of 78.9% and 81.1% similarity. Rm33 and Rm36 presented the lowest conservation, 33% identity and 35.5% similarity. Contigs of clade 2 formed by SGFAc sequences also displayed low divergence, even the least similar transcript Ac14; Ac13 presented a reasonable equivalence between sequences (25.1% identity and 27% similarity) whereas Ac15 and Ac16 had better conservation, presenting an identity of 56,5% and similarity of 61.4%. Clade 3 did not did not present the same level of conservation as clades 1 and 2, except for contigs Rs 402 and Rm31, which presented a high identity and similarity of 63.4% and 65.9%, respectively.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-11-363/MediaObjects/12864_2009_Article_2957_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Multiple alignment of Glycine-rich proteins of A. cajennense, R. sanguineus and R. microplus ticks. The transcript protein sequences of clades numbered in figure 3 were aligned in the Clustal X program and analyzed with Bioedit software. Clade 1: transcripts from R. microplus that were homologous with flagelliform silk protein of orb-web weaving spiders. Clade 2: transcripts from A. cajennense were homologous with major ampullate spidroin protein of non-orb-web weaving spiders. Clade 3: transcripts from R. sanguineus and R. microplus that were homologous with an "unknown", cement-like protein from R.. haemaphysaloides.

It was interesting to note the large conserved region visualized in each of the sequence alignments of clades 1 and 2. Five conserved regions are encountered in SGFRm contigs of clade 1 that are identical in the 6 contigs: 1) QLGPS (position 7-11), 2) SGSLG (position 13-17), 3) GVLPSG (position 56-61), 4) SGVGRG (position 82-87) and 5) TGFVLPG (position 89-95); some of these conserved regions could be extend if the charge and chemical proprieties of the residues from different contigs are taken into consideration. In the alignment for clade 1, aspartic acid (D) could change to glutamic acid (E) at residue 5, leucine (L) to isoleucin (I) at residue 6 (both hydrophobic), glycine (G) to serine (S) at residue 12 (both uncharged) and valine (V) to alanine (A) at residue 19 (both hydrophobic) and these amino acids present similar characteristics among each other. The same aspects can be observed for residues 43-61 and 89-98. In addition, when the contigs of clade 1 are compared with the composition of flageliform silk proteins, positions of important residues of silk proteins such as glycine, serine and proline are conserved among them (Additional file 2). Regarding clade 2, two conserved regions are found in all SGFAc contigs, one composed of 5 residues, FGSGF (position 134-138), and a second one with 10 residues, SGLGGGYGSG (position 140-149). It is noteworthy that both regions have glycine (the majority) and serine residues. Again, conserved regions contain glycine and serine residues, two abundant amino acids in spider silk. Alignment of Ac contigs and Masp proteins showed similarity in most positions containing glycine and serine residues, but not in positions with proline residues (Additional file 3). Sheets are formed in secondary structures of silk proteins with repeats containing glycine, serine and alanine, which confer their elastic and strength proprieties [16]. The presence of a proline residue between serine and glycine, as happens in sequences of clade 1, could be important to "interrupt" secondary structures determined by glycine, serine and alanine, promoting acquisition of more elastic and less stiff properties. The mechanical property of elasticity is greater in flagelliform silk proteins of orb-weaving spiders (e.g., the Nephila genus) that are made to capture flying prey than in major ampullate spidroin silk proteins (Masp) used in capture threads in less mobile spiders [15, 17]. The multiple alignments of clade 3 sequences, which are homologous with an "unknown" protein from Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides did not present conserved regions, perhaps owing to divergence among contigs and many gaps that could not allow long conserved regions. However, it can be observed though shading of the alignments that they present similarities as described before, with regions abundant in glycine and serine.

In addition to the contigs derived from R. microplus, R. sanquineus and A. cajennense analyzed herein and in order to increase the stringency of the test for our hypothesis, we performed a multiple alignment using contigs from the work of Francischetti et al. (2009; http://exon.niaid.nih.gov/transcriptome/tick_review/Sup-Table-1.xls.gz) [18] that reviewed all of the available salivary components of ticks. This work described a superfamily of glycine-rich proteins for argasid and ixodid ticks (mainly Brevirostrata ticks). We observed in this work that Argasid ticks produce only three types out of over four hundred types of GRPs. This maybe due to the fact that Argasid ticks are rapid feeders and complete a blood meal in minutes. We also observed that the majority of the GRPs found in Prostriate ticks (genus Ixodes), are collagen-like proteins. This group appears to have a primitive form of attachment among the ixodid ticks [3], presenting an intermediate complexity in this process. Finally, this work showed that in metastriate ticks (from the genera Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Rhipicephalus and Haemaphysalis) the GRPs belong to GGY, GYG and metastriate spider-like cement protein families. We therefore excluded analyses of GRPs from Ixodes sp. and Argasidae ticks and selected GRPs from the NR database on NCBI that present similarities with silk-like and cement-like proteins from A. variegatum, A. americanum, D. andersoni, R. microplus and R. appendiculatus (Sup-Table 1 of Francischetti et al., 2009).

We aligned all sequences similar to silk-like proteins from our libraries and the NR database from Sup-Table 1 (describe in Francischetti et al., 2009) and using the neighbor joining analysis produced the phylogram shown in Figure 4. Sequences generated by the present work are symbolized with a circle (: R. microplus), a square (■: R. sanquineus ) and a triangule (▲: A. cajennense). In addition to our sequences, 45 other transcript sequences of other species ticks are represented: Dermacentor andersoni and R. appendiculatus, both Brevirostrata, heteroxenous ticks, and A. variegatum and A. americanum, Longirostrata, heteroxenous ticks. Sequences of R. microplus from other sources were also included in the analysis. To the best of our knowledge there are no representatives of Longirostrata, monoxenous ticks that could be included in this analysis. This approach showed that contigs from Amblyomma ticks formed distinct clades (1 and 2). These clades did not present similarities with a specific type of flagelliform silk, a similarity consistently found in the Brevirostrata ticks D andersoni, R. microplus, R. appendiculatus and R. sanguineus. This can be observed in the most distinct clade formed by these latter species of ticks (clade 3). All sequences from this clade present similarity with flagelliform silk. Moreover, sequences in the dendogram displayed a wide-spread distribution, including a clade formed only by sequences from our libraries (clade 4), showing that we have contributed with diversified sequences encoding glycine-rich proteins from our ESTs database.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-11-363/MediaObjects/12864_2009_Article_2957_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Dendogram of glycine-rich proteins that present similarities with spider silk proteins. Transcripts of proteins described in this work (: R. microplus; ■: R. sanquineus; ▲: A. cajennense) and transcripts of proteins obtained in the catalogue of annotated salivary proteins available in Francischetti et al. (2009) were used to construct phylogenies (Amb var: A. variegatum; Amby am: A. americanum; Der and: D. andersoni; Rh ap: R. appendiculatus; Rh micro: R. microplus; the numbers refer to contig in Sup-Table1 [18]).

Cement-like proteins

Contigs homologous to so called cement-like proteins were found among each of the three libraries, yet were most abundant in the library derived from R. microplus (9 contigs versus two in SGFAc and 1 from SGFRs). The cement-like sequences from the same species analyzed before were aligned and used to generate the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 5, which showed six distinct clades. Clades 1 and 2 contain cement-like proteins from other Brevirostrata and Longirostrata ticks, indicating the diversity among cement-like proteins. Most sequences from clade 2 presented similarity with the salivary gland-associated protein 64P from R. appendiculatus, except sequence Rm 234, which showed similarity with NPL-2 (neuroprotein-like) from Ixodes pacificus. Clade 1 contains a subclade with sequences derived exclusively from R. microplus. Clade 3, in turn, presented sequences similar to putative cement protein RIM36 from R. appendiculatus (Ac 52) and Unknown protein from R. haemaphysaloides (Rs 156, 17, 4238; Rm 85, 479 and Ac 9). Clades 4 and 5, aside from illustrating the extensive diversity in the expression of cement-like proteins between the ticks, also indicate the expansion of the genus Rhipicephalus showing similarity with cement-like antigen protein from Haemaphysalis longicornis and an unknown protein from R. haemaphysaloides. Finally, Clade 6 contains sequences derived exclusively from R. appendiculatus.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-11-363/MediaObjects/12864_2009_Article_2957_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Dendogram of glycine-rich proteins that present similarities with cement-like proteins. Transcripts of proteins described in this work (: R. microplus; ■: R. sanquineus; ▲: A. cajennense) and transcripts of proteins obtained in the annotated catalog of Francischetti et al. (2009) were used to construct phylogenies (Amb var: A. variegatum; Amby am: A. americanum; Amb caj: A. cajennense; Der and: D. andersoni; Rh ap: R. appendiculatus; Rh micro: R. microplus, the numbers refer to contig in Sup-Table1 [18]).

Examination of the best hits to the sequences in the general NCBI database showed that several GRP contigs were significantly homologus to GRPs of plants (Rm 265, Rm 36, Rm 77, Rs 70, Ac 147, Ac 14) vertebrate skin (Rs 26, Rs12, Rs 70, Ac 354, Ac 13, Ac16) nucleic-acid-binding proteins (Rm 32, Ac 233 ) and to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE-PGRS multigene family (contigs Rm 479, Rm 533, Rm 29, Rs 29). These similarities may also shed light on the biological functions of the tick GRPs. In plants many GRPs form the walls of initially polysaccharide-rich primary water pipes of elongating plant organs [19]. These functions remit to those of the cement cone in Brevirostrata ticks, which forms a continuation of the hypostome that penetrates the host skin. Interestingly, seed plant GRPs can be allergens for vertebrates [20] and similarly tick saliva can elicit local hypersensitivity reactions in immune hosts [21]. GRPs also play a role in regulating permeability and penetration of toxins in insect cuticles [9]. In ticks the cement cone may assist the cuticle of the hypostome in trapping host cells and molecules that are cytotoxic for the parasite. Many secreted salivary GRPs are similar to RNA-binding proteins, which in the tick may participate in modifying the extracellular traps comprised of nucleic acids that can be produced by mast cells and neutrophils [22], which are present in the local inflammatory infiltrate elicited in the host's skin by tick bites. This finding can also explain the significant quantity of transcripts from SGFRm (20.7%, Additional file 1) categorized such as "nucleic acid binding" based on the GO database. Tick GRPs similar to keratins and loricrins, which are major envelope components of terminally differentiated epithelial cells of vertebrate skin [23], may serve as decoys for the host. Interestingly, the Brevirostrata ticks herein analyzed (R. microplus and R. sanguineus) displayed a greater number of transcripts related to development of epidermis and organization and biogenesis of extracellular matrix based on homologies to the GO database than the Longirostrata tick (A. cajennense). Finally, the products of the PE-PGRS multigene family of M. tuberculosis form a source of antigenic variation among different strains of this bacterium [24]; in addition PE-PGRS contain many Gly-Ala repeats, which are also present in tick GRPs and which have been shown to inhibit ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent protein degradation in mycobacteria and Epstein-Barr virus [25, 26]. Since libraries were constructed from a pool of salivary glands from several individual females, the diversity in contigs of salivary GRPs may reflect the existence of a similar mechanism in ticks.

GRPs present biochemical characteristics that could possibly be involved in stabilizing the tick to its feeding site for long periods due to their putative structural and mechanical functions inferred from the abundance of the amino acid glycine. GRPs may also block host immune system molecules that enter in contact with the tick mouthparts [4]. Many contigs were similar to silk proteins from spiders, such as fibroin, dragline, flagelliform, major ampullate spidroin and flag silks. Each one of these fibers is composed of one or more proteins encoded by the silk fibroin gene family. Spiders draw fibers from dissolved fibroin proteins that are stored in specialized sets of abdominal glands [27]. It is interesting to note that ticks generate silk-like proteins from their salivary glands, while spiders use abdominal glands for this purpose and reserve their salivary glands for production of venom. Tick silk-like GRPs may possibly support mechanical needs (e.g., fixation to host skin), as well as the capture of prey and predators (respectively, blood and cytotoxic leukocytes). Spider silks are being employed as scaffolds for engineering tissues [28] and tick silk-like proteins may be more adequate for this purpose because of the intimate relation of this parasite with its host's skin.

There are other precedents in nature for our finding that the distribution of distinct GRPs correlates with the biology of metastriate ticks. Spiders, which are also Arachnidae, offer a well known example: the architecture and mechanical properties of different spider webs are correlated with the biological characteristics of their spinners, for example, aerial versus terrestrial capture habits. These properties ultimately rely on the specialized functions of different types of silks. Of interest to studies on the evolution of ticks, orb weaving by spiders is monophyletic, having evolved only once and speciation of spiders relates to use of different silks [15]. Genes encoding flagelliform silks were thought to be expressed exclusively by modern orb weaver spiders that make more elastic, gluey webs. However it was recently shown that cribellate orb weavers, which make drier webs, also express flagelliform silk genes [29], albeit in lower quantities. Blackledge and colleagues [15] suggested that an increase in the expression of flagelliform silk genes may have resulted in development of modern orb weavers [15]. Another example refers to the silks produced by salivary glands of simuliid filter-feeding flies. Simulium noelleri and S. ornatum use silk pads to attach to substrates, the composition of which varies according the requirements of their habitats: S. noelleri feeds in lake outlets where weaker currents are found and S. ornatum feeds in open waters with stronger currents. Accordingly, there are differences between ageing processes and biochemical composition of the silk pads from these two species, S. ornatum presenting the most durable structure [30]. A third and final example is offered by larvae of two species of caddisflies. Hydropsyche angustipennis spins hiding tubes and catching nets that collect food in water currents; larvae of Limnephilus decipiens use silk fiber only for stitching fragments of grass into hiding and pupation cases. The composition of the silk fibers from these species differed by the arrangement of motifs in higher order repeats and by the presence of species-specific motifs. Although the amounts of glycine are similar, the H-fibroin of H. angustipennis presents proline containing motifs, whereas L. decipiens presents a highly charged motif, EEGRRR [31].

Conclusions

In the present work the differences observed for distribution of glycine-rich proteins were related to the number of hosts visited (i.e., if the species is monoxenous or heteroxenous) and to the anatomy of mouthparts (long or short hypostome) of three species of metastriate ticks. All ixodid ticks, with the exception of some Prostriate, present a strategy for attachment, but it differs among them. The species from the genus Amblyomma, which belongs to the Longirostrata ticks, secrete a casing around their long, fully inserted hypostome. In ticks from the Brevirostrata group, which includes species from the genus Rhipicephalus, the mouthparts are short and barely penetrate in epidermis [3], so a larger cement cone, from which GRPs have been purified [4], is necessary and is deposited in the upper layers of their host's skin. Thus, it seems that the two Brevirostrata ticks, R. microplus and R. sanguineus, need to express more glycine-rich proteins than the Longirostrata tick, A. cajennense, in order to compensate for the small size of mouthparts and for the superficial fixation at the site of attachment. Furthermore, R. microplus is monoxenous and R. sanguineus is heteroxenous and comparisons made between these ticks show that the former presents the greatest diversity of glycine-rich proteins, possibly because it is a one-host tick that feeds uninterrupted for many days until completion of its life cycle and, therefore, has greater demands for sustaining its attachment on host skin.

Contigs of salivary glands for several other species of ticks have also been examined. While the relative abundance of transcripts coding for glycine-rich proteins cannot be accurately compared between salivary gland libraries constructed in different laboratories and undergoing different biological situations (for example, infection and feeding time, number of salivary glands used or if whole body ticks were used, etc), it is still noteworthy that annotation of the transcriptomes of salivary glands from female I. scapularis and I. pacificus indicate that prostriate ticks do not rely on glycine-rich proteins as heavily as metastriate ticks for their attachment to hosts or for other biological functions [32, 12]. On the other hand, salivary glands of females of D. andersoni, a metastriate, heteroxenous, Brevirostrata tick, also contain abundant transcripts for GRPs: of the 30 contigs containing the most abundantly expressed ESTs in salivary glands of females of D. andersoni, 9 presented similarities to glycine-rich proteins and contained from 21 to 5 ESTs each [33].

In conclusion, our findings furnish preliminary evidence to support the hypothesis that species of ticks with differences in the anatomy of their mouthparts and in the number of hosts they infest during their biological cycle rely on different types and quantities of glycine-rich proteins. This hypothesis must be further tested by expanding these observations to a larger number of species, by experimental approaches such as RNA interference of expression of selected GRPs and by characterization of isolated GRPs. The data suggests that prostriate ticks rely on their elongated barbed hypostome mouthparts and make shallow cement cones, while the metastriate ticks rely on a larger and deeper cement cone possibly to compensate their relatively smaller mouth parts [3]. The number of hosts visited by ticks during the parasitic stage of their life cycle also requires adaptations. According to Balashov (1972) [34] and Hoogstraal and Kim (1985) [35] there was a transition from the three host to the two and one host cycle in Hyalomma and in Rhipicephalinae species of ticks. The biological characteristic of having a single host is regarded as an adaptation of this immobile ectoparasite to large nomadic animals since ixodid ticks die when they are unable to find a host. Monoxenous ticks are thus better adapted to open environments inhabited by large, grazing ungulates. The ability to molt on the vertebrate reduces the number of necessary encounters and thus increases chances for tick survival.

In addition to elucidating the biology of tick salivary proteins, the information contained in this work is relevant for the development of vaccines that target GRPs of ticks and that aim for protection against a broad range of species. The approach undertaken in this work can subsidize the choice of the different GRPs present in tick salivary glands for evaluation as protective antigens.

Methods

Ticks

Adult female ticks of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Amblyomma cajennense were collected from naturally infested vertebrate hosts; cattle, dogs and horses, respectively. Samples were collected as to cover the feeding process until the phase of rapid engorgement. Ticks of different sizes, but always ≤ 4 mm in body length (before the rapid engorgement phase of feeding; approximately three to four days post attachment) were used for salivary gland dissection to avoid degeneration of salivary gland proteins [36, 37]. Ticks were collected from a sample of several hosts and over a period of two to five days and, once removed from the hosts, salivary glands were immediately dissected; a total of 20-30 ticks were used per library. Glands were briefly washed in ice-cold 1X PBS and immediately stored in RNA later storage solution at 4°C for 24 hours and (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) then transferred to -80°C for long term storage.

Extraction of mRNA and cDNA library synthesis

Poly A+ mRNA from tick salivary glands was isolated using the Micro-Fast Track™ 2.0 mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) following the manufacturer's instructions. mRNA (similar concentrations for all samples) was used to construct the cDNA library using the vector TriplEx2 according to the instructions for the SMART™ cDNA Library Construction kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, California) with some modifications [38] and packaged into lambda phage using the Gigapack® III Gold Packaging Extract (Stratagene, La Jolla, California).

The phage sample was used as a template for a PCR reaction to randomly amplify cDNAs. The primers used for this reaction were sequences from the TriplEX2 vector. PT2F1 (5' -AAG TAC TCT AGC AAT TGT GAG C-3') is positioned upstream of the cDNA of interest (5' end), and PT2R1 (5'-CTC TTC GCT ATT ACG CCA GCT G-3') is positioned downstream of the cDNA of interest (3' end). The cleaned PCR product was used as a template for a cycle-sequencing reaction using the Big Dye kit (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, California).The primer used for sequencing, PT2F3 (5'-TCT CGG GAA GCG CGC CAT TGT-3') is upstream of the inserted cDNA and downstream of the primer PT2F1. Sequencing reactions were performed in one direction only on a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California).

Bioinformatic tools

Detailed description of the bioinformatic treatment of the data can be found elsewhere with some modifications [38, 12]. The programs used were written in Visual Basic 6.0 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington) by one of us (JMR). Briefly the ESTs (raw sequences) were trimmed of primer and vector sequences, clustered into related groups, based on homology, using the BLASTN algorithm (minimum identity of 81 nucleotides over 90 nucleotides) [39], and then assembled and aligned using the CAP3 assembler [40]. The consensus sequences and singletons resulting from the CAP3 assembler were compared to the Non-Redundant (NR) protein database of the NCBI; a customized protein database containing all Arachnida sequences available on Genbank, and the Gene Ontology (GO) database [41] using the BLASTX algorithm (downloaded from an executable file obtained from the NCBI FTP site [39]. Since libraries were constructed in a unidirectional orientation, BLASTX results were only considered if they were on the positive sense strand. A cut-off E-value of 10-3 was considered for annotation. All sequences were translated into three Sequences containing >5% non-assigned nucleotides (Ns) or final length of less than 100 nt were removed from the analysis and assumed to be of poor quality. The final output was piped into a tab-delimited file imported into an Excel (Microsoft Excel Analysis Tools, Seattle, WA) spreadsheet. We used the χ2 test and Fisher test to analyze differences in the distribution of ESTs in the different libraries. Phylogenetic analysis of glycine-rich contigs was conducted by first aligning sequences obtained from our cDNA library analysis with published GRP sequences recently cataloged by Francischetti et al. (2009) [18] as well as silk protein sequences obtained from Genbank, using ClustalX Sequence Alignment program [42]. Alignments were manually refined using BioEdit sequence editing software [43]. Phylogeneic associations were determined using neighbour joining (NJ) analysis (Mega 4.0 [44]). Node support of each clade was evaluated using bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates).

Accession numbers

All sequences are deposited in dbEST (Expresses Sequence Tags database) of GenBank (NCBI). SGFAc: gi 224366827 - gi 224366849; SGFRm: gi 224366850 - gi 224366907 and SGFRs: gi 224366908 - gi 224366954.

Abbreviations

SGF: 

stands for salivary glands of female ticks

Rm: 

for Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Rs: 

for Rhipicephalus sanguineus

Ac: 

Amblyomma cajennense. Thus, the abbreviations SGFRs, SGFRm and SGFAc mean, respectively, cDNA library of salivary glands from feeding female ticks of Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Amblyomma cajennense.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq (grant numbers 420067/2005-1 and 505810/2004-2), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP (04/09992-7) and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The authors thank Dr. João S. Silva for generous and continuing support of this work performed in his laboratory. This work fulfils part of the requirements for a MSc program for S.R.M, supported by scholarships from FAPESP (06/54041-6 and 07/59357-4).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departament of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo
(2)
Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
(3)
Departament of Maternal and Child and Public Health Nursing, Ribeirão Preto School of Nursing, University of São Paulo
(4)
School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia
(5)
International Livestock Research Institute
(6)
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia
(7)
Universidade Paulista

References

  1. Ribeiro JM: How ticks make a living. Parasitol Today. 1995, 11: 91-93. 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80162-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sonenshine DE: Biology of ticks. 1993, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Kemp DH, Stone BF, Binnington KC: Tick attachment and feeding: Role of the mouthparts, feeding apparatus, salivary gland secretions, and the host response. Physiology of ticks. Edited by: Obechain, Galun. 1982, Oxford, Pergamon Press Ltd, 119-167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Muller-Doblie UU, Wikel SK: The Human Reaction to Ticks. Tick Borne Diseases of Humans. Edited by: Goodman JL, Dennis DT, Sonenshine DE. 2005, Washington DC, ASM Press, 102-122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Szabó MPJ, Bechara GH: Sequential histopathology at the Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick feeding site on dogs and guinea pigs. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999, 23: 915-928. 10.1023/A:1006347200373.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop R, Lambson B, Wells C, Pandit P, Osaso J, Nkonge C, Morzaria S, Musoke A, Nene V: A cement protein of the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, located in the secretory e cell granules of the type III salivary gland acini, induces strong antibody responses in cattle. Int J Parasitol. 2002, 32: 833-842. 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00027-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Trimnell AR, Davies GM, Lissina O, Hails RS, Nuttall PA: A cross-reactive tick cement antigen is a candidate broad-spectrum tick vaccine. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 4329-4341. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.041.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mousavi A, Hotta Y: Glycine-rich proteins: a class of novel proteins. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005, 120: 169-174. 10.1385/ABAB:120:3:169.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang J, Goyer C, Pelletier Y: Environmental stresses induce the expression of putative glycine-rich insect cuticular protein genes in adult Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Mol Biol. 2008, 17: 209-216. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00796.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Trimnell AR, Hails RS, Nuttall PA: Dual action ectoparasite vaccine targeting 'exposed' and 'concealed' antigens. Vaccine. 2002, 20: 3560-3568. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00334-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Havlíková S, Roller L, Koci J, Trimnell AR, Kazimírová M, Klempa B, Nuttall PA: Functional role of 64P, the candidate transmission-blocking vaccine antigen from the tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Int J Parasitol. 2009, 13: 1485-94. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.05.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ribeiro JM, Alarcon-Chaidez F, Francischetti IM, Mans BJ, Mather TN, Valenzuela JG, Wikel SK: An annotated catalog of salivary gland transcripts from Ixodes scapularis ticks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006, 36: 111-129. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.11.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaufman W: The influence of various factors on fluid secretion by in vitro salivary glands of ixodid Ticks. J Exp Biol. 1976, 64: 727-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Okamoto S, Futahashi R, Kojima T, Mita K, Fujiwara H: Catalogue of epidermal genes: genes expressed in the epidermis during larval molt of the silkworm Bombyx mori. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 396-10.1186/1471-2164-9-396.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Blackledge TA, Scharff N, Coddington JA, Szüts T, Wenzel JW, Hayashi CY, Agnarsson I: Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 13: 5229-34. 10.1073/pnas.0901377106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Voet DJ, Voet JG: Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins. Biochemistry. Edited by: Nedah Rose. 1995, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 155-156. 2Google Scholar
  17. Blackledge TA, Hayashi CY: Unraveling the mechanical properties of composite silk threads spun by cribellate orb-weaving spiders. J Exp Biol. 2006, 209: 3131-3140. 10.1242/jeb.02327.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Francischetti IM, Sa-Nunes A, Mans BJ, Santos IM, Ribeiro JM: The role of saliva in tick feeding. Front Biosci. 2009, 14: 2051-2088. 10.2741/3363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryser U, Schorderet M, Guyot R, Keller B: A new structural element containing glycine-rich proteins and rhamnogalacturonan I in the protoxylem of seed plants. J Cell Science. 2004, 117: 1179-1190. 10.1242/jcs.00966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lunardi C, Nanni L, Tiso M, Mingari MC, Bason C, Oliveri M, Keller B, Millo R, De Sandre G, Corrocher R, Puccetti A: Glycine-rich cell wall proteins act as specific antigen targets in autoimmune and food allergic disorders. Int Immunol. 2000, 12: 647-657. 10.1093/intimm/12.5.647.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shapiro SZ, Voigt WP, Ellis JA: Acquired resistance to ixodid ticks induced by tick cement antigen. Exp Appl Acarol. 1989, 7: 33-41. 10.1007/BF01200451.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A: Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007, 5: 577-582. 10.1038/nrmicro1710.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Steinert PM, Mack JW, Korge BP, Gan SQ, Haynes SR, Steven AC: Glycine loops in proteins: their occurrence in certain intermediate filament chains, loricrins and single-stranded RNA binding proteins. Int J Biol Macromol. 1991, 13: 130-139. 10.1016/0141-8130(91)90037-U.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Poulet S, Cole ST: Characterization of the highly abundant polymorphic GC-rich-repetitive sequence (PGRS) present in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Arch. Microbiol. 1995, 163: 87-95. 10.1007/BF00381781.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Brennan MJ, Delogu G: The PE multigene family: a 'molecular mantra' for mycobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10: 246-249. 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02335-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitskaya J, Sharipo A, Leonchiks A, Ciechanover A, Masucci MG: Inhibition of ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent protein degradation by the Gly-Ala repeat domain of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 12616-12621. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12616.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gatesy J, Hayashi C, Motriuk D, Woods J, Lewis R: Extreme diversity, conservation, and convergence of spider silk fibroin sequences. Science. 2001, 291: 2603-2605. 10.1126/science.1057561.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandal BB, Kundu SC: Non-bioengineered silk fibroin protein 3D scaffolds for potential biotechnological and tissue engineering applications. Macromol Biosci. 2008, 8: 807-818. 10.1002/mabi.200800113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Garb JE, Dimauro T, Vo V, Hayashi CY: Silk genes support the single origin of orb webs. Science. 2006, 312 (5781): 1762-10.1126/science.1127946.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiel E: Durability of Simuliid Silk Pads (Simuliidae, Diptera). Aquat Insect. 1997, 19: 15-22. 10.1080/01650429709361632.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yonemura N, Sehnal F, Mita K, Tamura T: Protein composition of silk filaments spun under water by caddisfly larvae. Biomacromolecules. 2006, 7: 3370-3378. 10.1021/bm060663u.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Francischetti IM, My PV, Mans BJ, Andersen JF, Mather TN, Lane RS, Ribeiro JM: The transcriptome of the salivary glands of the female western black-legged tick Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 35: 1142-1161. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.05.007.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Alarcon-Chaidez FJ, Sun J, Wikel SK: Transcriptome analysis of the salivary glands of Dermacentor andersoni Stiles (Acari: Ixodidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 37: 48-71. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.10.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Balashov YS: Bloodsucking ticks (Ixodoidea) - vetors of diseases of man and animals (Translation from Russian). Misc publ Entomol Soc Am. 1972, 8: 161-362.Google Scholar
  35. Hoogstraal H, Kim KC: Tick and mammal's coevolution with emphasis on Haemaphysalis. Coevolution of Parasitic Arthropods and Mammals. Edited by: Kim KC. 1985, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 505-568.Google Scholar
  36. Binnington KC: Sequential changes in salivary gland structure during attachment and feeding of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Int J Parasitol. 1978, 8: 97-115. 10.1016/0020-7519(78)90004-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Nunes ET, Mathias MI, Bechara GH: Structural and cytochemical changes in the salivary glands of the Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (CANESTRINI, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae) tick female during feeding. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 140: 114-123. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.03.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Valenzuela JG, Francischetti IM, Pham VM, Garfield MK, Mather TN, Ribeiro JM: Exploring the sialome of the tick Ixodes scapularis. J Exp Biol. 2002, 205: 2843-2864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang X, Madan A: CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9: 868-877. 10.1101/gr.9.9.868.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 25-29. 10.1038/75556.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bioedit. [http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/page2.html]
  44. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Bio Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Maruyama et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement