Table 5 Comparison of repetitive DNA sequence contents (%) of D. holocanthus, T. rubripes, and Te. nigroviridis
Component | D. holocanthus | T. rubripes | Te. nigroviridis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | WG | HR-fugu | HR-tetra | WG | HR-Dh | WG | HR-Dh |
Bases masked (%) | 7.94 | 5.16 | 4.87 | 6.89 | 2.43 | 4.66 | 2.93 |
Interspersed repeats | 6.73 | 4.05 | 3.84 | 4.69 | 1.03 | 2.03 | 0.18 |
   Retroelements | 6.00 | 3.76 | 3.36 | 3.39 | 0.33 | 1.37 | 0.08 |
SINEs | 2.00 | 1.63 | 1.15 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
LINEs | 3.44 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 2.51 | 0.22 | 1.06 | 0.08 |
LTR elements | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.00 |
   DNA transposons | 0.66 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 1.05 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
   Rolling-circles | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
   Unclassified | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
Small RNA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Satellites | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Simple repeats | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 1.75 | 0.93 | 1.96 | 2.34 |
Low complexity | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.41 |