Genome-wide promoter analysis of histone modifications in human monocyte-derived antigen presenting cells
- Liina Tserel†1,
- Raivo Kolde†2,
- Ana Rebane1,
- Kai Kisand1,
- Tõnis Org1,
- Hedi Peterson2,
- Jaak Vilo2 and
- Pärt Peterson1Email author
© Tserel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 16 June 2010
Accepted: 18 November 2010
Published: 18 November 2010
Monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) are important in inflammatory processes and are often used for immunotherapeutic approaches. Blood monocytes can be differentiated into macrophages and DCs, which is accompanied with transcriptional changes in many genes, including chemokines and cell surface markers.
To study the chromatin modifications associated with this differentiation, we performed a genome wide analysis of histone H3 trimethylation on lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and 27 (H3K27me3) as well as acetylation of H3 lysines (AcH3) in promoter regions. We report that both H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks significantly correlate with transcriptionally active genes whereas H3K27me3 mark is associated with inactive gene promoters. During differentiation, the H3K4me3 levels decreased on monocyte-specific CD14, CCR2 and CX3CR1 but increased on DC-specific TM7SF4/DC-STAMP, TREM2 and CD209/DC-SIGN genes. Genes associated with phagocytosis and antigen presentation were marked by H3K4me3 modifications. We also report that H3K4me3 levels on clustered chemokine and surface marker genes often correlate with transcriptional activity.
Our results provide a basis for further functional correlations between gene expression and histone modifications in monocyte-derived macrophages and DCs.
Human peripheral blood monocytes are derived from myeloid progenitors in bone marrow. After their maturation, they migrate to the periphery and form approximately 5-10% of human leukocytes. Monocytes circulate in the blood stream for several days and then enter to peripheral tissues where they undergo a phenotypic change and differentiate further into macrophages or dendritic cells (DCs) [1–4]. In tissues, macrophages have a central role to locally phagocytose and destroy pathogens, to clear senescent cells and to repair tissues after the inflammatory processes . Activated macrophages show strong inflammatory responses through the high production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased endocytic and antigen presentation activity. Similarly to macrophages, DCs are located in peripheral tissues where they encounter and phagocytose microbes. The recognition of microbial antigen occurs in the immature state of DCs and leads to a maturation process, after which they have increased antigen presentation but downregulated antigen recognition capacity. The maturation is often accompanied with the migration of DCs to secondary lymphoid organs  and several murine DC subsets with variable phenotype, function or tissue locations have been reported .
The peripheral blood monocytes exhibit a heterogeneous phenotype with respect to their size and nuclear morphology. They can be relatively easily identified by high expression of the cell surface marker CD14 and can be divided into at least two major subpopulations according to their CD16 expression . DCs derived from monocytes are particularly important during inflammatory processes and are efficient in stimulating CD4 and CD8 positive T cell responses [8–11]. Recent studies showed that monocytes can also differentiate into macrophages and DCs under non-inflammatory conditions and that several subsets of antigen presenting cells located in antigen capture areas, such as skin, mucosa, gastrointestinal and respiratory track, are in fact derived from monocytes [12, 13]. To generate a large number of human macrophages or DCs, monocytes are typically cultured for several days in the presence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone or GM-CSF with interleukin 4 (IL-4), respectively [14, 15]. Although these culture conditions give rise to only one subset of differentiated cells and do not represent the full heterogeneity of macrophages or DCs in vivo, it still is the most efficient way to obtain human antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, monocyte-derived DCs are by far the most common type of cells used in immunotherapeutic clinical approaches [16, 17].
Histone modifications within promoter regions have an important function in regulation of gene expression . The majority of modifications occur at the N-terminal ends of the core histones in a nucleosome. These modifications are often dynamic as well as reversible and have a functional impact on many aspects of chromatin accessibility that may determine the transcriptional status of a given gene. One of the most frequent histone modifications is the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3), which in gene promoters is usually associated with the transcriptional activation, whereas the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) generally results in gene silencing. The presence of these two opposing modifications as bivalent marks on promoters is often associated with poised gene transcription. Similar to the H3K4me3 mark, the acetylation of lysines on histone H3 (AcH3) is often associated with transcriptional activation . How exactly these combinations of chromatin modifications translate to gene transcription is currently under extensive investigation in several cell types. Transcriptional control is further mediated by chromatin associated proteins; for example H3K4me3 may serve as a docking site for PHD finger domain and AcH3 for bromodomains .
Here we studied the histone H3K4me3, AcH3 and H3K27me3 modifications in human monocytes, monocyte-derived macrophages and DCs. To gain insight into the role of these modifications during the differentiation process, we compared genome-wide gene expression profiles with histone changes in promoter regions over the genome. We show that H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks generally correlate well with gene expression and that H3K27me3 is associated with inactive genes. We also show that H3K4me3 levels are increased on the promoters of several marker genes and gene groups during differentiation. In addition, we provide evidence that the chromatin statuses of gene families within genomic clusters, including chemokine and surface receptor genes, are coordinately modified.
Genome-wide mRNA expression profiles
Upregulated and downregulated genes in macrophages and DCs
MF and DC
Selected marker and cytokine gene expression signals and their differential scores after differentiation to macrophages and DCs
Genome-wide chromatin profiling of promoter regions
To investigate the correlation between gene expression profiles and histone modifications in monocytes, macrophages and DCs, we used a high-resolution promoter microarray screen with immunoprecipitated chromatin (ChIP-chip). Cells were cross-linked and chromatin was immunoprecipitated with antibodies to H3K4me3, H3K27me3 and AcH3, as well as to general H3. The immunoprecipitated material was then hybridized to the NimbleGen promoter array covering 19222 gene promoters in the human genome that overlap with 17289 genes on the Illumina Human-6 v2 BeadChip expression array. The ChIP-chip data with each modification-specific antibody was further normalized to random genomic background and to general H3.
H3K4me3 and AcH3 have a high correlation on gene promoters
Transcriptionally active genes have a double modification of H3K4me3 and AcH3
Frequency of H3K4me3, AcH3 and H3K27me3 modifications on 2000 genes with high or low expression and their correlation P-values
Histone marks H3K4me3 and AcH3 alone are unstable
Modifications on marker genes often correlate with transcriptional activity
Genes related to phagocytosis and antigen presentation have active chromatin marks
Phagocytosis and antigen presentation are the two most central functions of monocytes and monocyte-derived cells. We therefore studied the histone modifications of genes involved in these two key categories of antigen presenting cells in correlation with their expression levels. Out of 15 genes associated with phagocytic function, the double H3K4me3/AcH3 mark was present on 11 promoters in monocytes, on 8 promoters in macrophage and on 6 promoters in DC populations (Figure 5B, C). Also, a majority of the 37 genes associated with antigen presentation, including HLA (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB5, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DMA and HLA-DMB), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), proteasome-associated (PSMB5, PSMB8, PSMB9, PSMB10, PSMF1, PSME2, and PSME3) and peptide transporter (TAP1 and TAP2) had the double H3K4me3/AcH3 mark on their promoters (23, 28 and 27 genes in monocytes, macrophages and DC, respectively) (Figure 5B, C). These data are in good agreement with the general functionality of antigen-presenting cells, where monocytes and macrophages are more active in phagocytic activities while macrophages and DCs are more efficient in antigen presentation.
A majority of active transcription factor promoters have the H3K4me3 mark
We next studied histone modifications on genes associated with transcriptional processes. A majority of the expressed transcription factor genes had the H3K4me3 modification on their promoter, often together with the AcH3 mark, and a few with the H3K27me3 (Additional file 1, Figure S4). More specifically, the upregulated transcription factors BHLHE41/BHLHB3 (basic helix-loop-helix family, member e41), EGR2 (early growth response factor 2), EPAS1/HIF2A (hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha), and MSC (musculin, activated B cell factor 1) had the bivalent H3K4me3/H3K27me3 mark in monocytes; however, the H3K27me3 mark was lost in macrophages and DCs. Other upregulated transcriptional factors such as PIR (pirin, iron-binding nuclear protein), ESR1 (estrogen receptor), HES6 (hairy and enhancer of split 6) and IRF4 (interferon responsive factor 4) and KLF5 (Kruppel like factor 5) maintained the H3K27me3 mark even after their upregulation during differentiation. Interestingly, the ETS family member EHF/ESE-3 did not have any modification. Notably, many transcription factor families involved in differentiation or lineage-specific regulation in other cell types or tissues were marked with the silencing H3K27me3 mark (Additional file 1, Figure S5). For example, 38/39 HOX, 20/30 FOX, 11/195 SOX, 9/9 PAX, 8/8 LHX, 5/6 SIX, 8/11 POU, 6/6 NKX, 5/6 IRX, 6/6 NEURO and 5/6 GATA family transcription factors were positive for the H3K27me3 modification in all three cell populations. This also correlated with the overall transcriptionally inactive status in all three cell types.
Next we used the program Opossum to compare the occurrence of transcription factor binding motifs in gene promoters with and without histone modifications. We found a remarkable enrichment of ETS and C2H2 zinc finger family transcription factor sites in gene promoters enriched with AcH3 modifications. The genes with H3K4me3 marks were enriched for homeobox and high mobility group (HMG) box transcription factor binding sites. It is likely that the presence of these transcription factors binding sites reflects their activity in recruitment of histone modifier proteins to the promoters [21, 22].
The H3K4me3 modification correlates with the expression in gene clusters
To confirm the ChIP-chip data, we studied the H3K4me3 modification on several marker gene promoters by conventional ChIP assay. As expected, the CD14 gene showed reduced whereas the TM7SF4/DC-STAMP, TREM2, CD209/DC-SIGN and CD1A gene promoters demonstrated increased levels of H3K4me3 (Additional file 1, Figure S7). Similarly, the chemokine genes CCL13, CCL23, CCL17 and CCL22 showed strongly elevated levels of the H3K4me3 marks. This increase in H3K4me3 on chemokine genes was also present in macrophages, albeit at lower level. Taken together, our results demonstrate that several marker genes and clustered gene families, including cell surface receptors and CC chemokines that are activated during differentiation into macrophages and DCs, show the increase in H3K4 methylation on their promoters.
The recent advent of new technologies analyzing genome-wide chromatin changes has greatly improved our understanding of gene regulation and control. These global approaches provide a large-scale picture to the extent of changes and can be used for further dissection of gene-specific modifications. Our genome-wide mRNA expression profile and map of three major histone modifications associated with gene expression in monocytes, macrophages and DCs are an addition to previous studies in immune cells [23–27].
We found a high concordance rate between two active promoter marks, H3K4me3 and AcH3, in all three populations. Furthermore, the overall density of H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks on promoter regions displayed a similar pattern, with two elevated peaks surrounding transcription start site and a significant decline at the point of transcription, representing reduced levels of H3K4me3 and AcH3 in a region covered by RNA polymerase II and other regulatory proteins [28, 29]. As the respective peaks of H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks by and large coincide, it is likely that they also often co-occur in the same nucleosomes. Thus, our data confirm a tight association of H3K4me3 and AcH3 modifications with permissive chromatin for transcription in antigen-presenting cells. In contrast, H3K27me3 had an overall very low concordance with active marks and was equally distributed over the promoter regions with only slight decline at transcription start site.
The H3K4me3 mark was clearly a predominant modification on gene promoters, and most commonly was coupled with AcH3. This is in agreement with the earlier reported genome-wide studies from embryonic stem cells [30, 31], CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [24–26], all reporting H3K4me3 as the most characteristic modification in promoter regions. The H3K4me3 mark was also strongly correlated with the transcriptional activity of a gene. Interestingly, we noticed a gradual decrease of the H3K4me3 mark among active genes during the differentiation of monocytes to DCs, and accordingly, the number of genes without any modification increased. It should be noted that the global number of genes with a detectable expression signal between the three cell populations did not change significantly. This suggests that during differentiation, a subset of genes lose their H3K4me3 mark independently of their gene expression and also hints at a highly dynamic nature of histone modifications during differentiation. When studying the dynamics of histone modifications, we found that both the H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks are unstable when they occur alone and are prone to either lose the modification (i.e. become a promoter without mark) or to gain another permissive mark. In contrast, having the combination of both the H3K4me3 and AcH3 marks in a gene promoter was highly stable, and the majority of genes having this combination of histone marks in monocytes also had it in macrophages and DC. The overall decrease of the H3K4me3 mark and the reciprocal increase of genes with or without the H3K27me3 mark in the DC population suggests that the ex vivo differentiation in the presence of IL-4 induces a global shift towards less active chromatin.
At the single gene level we found many differences in histone modification profiles, in particular between monocytes and in vitro cultivated cells, which correlate with their transcriptional changes. As expected, the expression levels of many marker genes showed a good correlation with the presence of active histone modifications. When we analyzed the gain or loss of marks during differentiation, we found a remarkable decline in the H3K4me3 mark on several monocyte-specific marker genes and a corresponding increase in promoters of DC-specific genes. The prominent exceptions were the CD83 and CD40 genes, which were not associated with any histone mark. Similar to marker genes, the genes associated with antigen presentation activity and phagocytosis were expressed at high levels and had either the H3K4me3 or AcH3 mark. Notably, genes that are associated with phagocytosis had more permissive H3K4me3/AcH3 mark in their promoters in the monocyte population, whereas the genes associated with antigen presentation had more H3K4me3/AcH3 mark in macrophages and DCs. Although there was no dramatic difference between the cell populations in general, this correlation of histone modifications argues in favor of the role of histone modifications in these two key functions of antigen-presenting cells. In case of transcription factors, the situation was more complex, and in many cases the pattern of transcriptional activity of the gene did not match with expected histone modifications. However, the silencing H3K27me3 modification marked a vast majority of transcription factors involved in development or lineage decision in other cell types.
In our analysis, we identified several genomic clusters with changes in their chromatin status suggesting that histone modifications in genomic loci are coordinately regulated. In particular, we found that in macrophages and DCs, H3K4me3 levels increased in a large genomic cluster of proinflammatory and chemotactic CC chemokines on chromosomes 17q11.2 and 16q13 . Typically, CC chemokines attract mononuclear cells and/or are induced in an inflammatory environment, thus our findings suggest the requirement of histone modifications on chemokine gene clusters for their responses to inflammatory situations. These changes in H3K4me3 modifications were not limited to chemokine gene clusters as we found similar changes in other gene clusters involved in inflammatory processes (CD1, C1Q, SLAM, CD300 and IFITM families). Interestingly, we noted that even when the gene expression levels in macrophages and DCs differed, the histone marks in these two cell populations were often similar. This indicates that the histone modification status might be established before the actual expression of the gene and serve as a prerequisite for rapid activation by gene-specific transcription factors upon inflammatory stimuli. However, changes in chromatin modifications may also occur during subsequent activation steps. For example, studies in murine bone marrow derived macrophages showed that genes induced by TLR4 stimulation can be divided into two subclasses based on their gene-specific activation and histone H4 acetylation . Our work here provides a basis for the further studies to address the role of histone modifications in chemokine and other gene clusters in human macrophages and DCs after the activation with inflammatory stimuli.
The results of genome-wide promoter analysis of H3K4me3, H3K27me3 and AcH3 histone modifications in monocyte-derived macrophage and DCs show specific correlation between the expression of functional gene groups, including marker and chemokine genes, and their chromatin state on promoters. Our data describe several differences of H3K4me3 modification profiles in monocytes, macrophages and DCs but also suggest that the chromatin status of functionally important gene clusters is coordinately modified. Together, the results provide a functional correlation between gene expression and histone modifications in monocyte-derived macrophages and DCs.
Monocytes were purified from freshly collected buffy coats obtained from blood donors of Tartu University Hospital's Blood Center. The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of the University of Tartu, Estonia (protocol numbers 170/T-7 and 182/M-1). All participants were older than 18-years and gave written informed consent. PBMC were prepared by density gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque™PLUS (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB). Monocytes were purified by positive sorting using anti-CD14-conjugated magnetic microbeads and by two runs through LS columns (both from Miltenyi Biotech) to obtain purities over 99%. The cells were differentiated into macrophages using 50 ng/ml GM-CSF and into DCs using 50 ng/ml GM-CSF and 25 ng/ml IL-4 (both from PeproTech) for 6 d at 1 million cells/ml in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 10% FCS (all from PAA). The expression of surface proteins on monocytes, macrophages and DCs were analyzed using fluorescence conjugated antibodies CD14, DC-SIGN, CD80 and CD83 (Miltenyi) and FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) to confirm the characteristic phenotype (Additional file 1, Figure S8).
Illumina gene expression array
RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). The concentration of RNA was assessed with NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies) and the quality with Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). RNA integrity numbers (RIN) indicated good quality of RNA, ranging from 6.5 to 9.3. Illumina TotalPrep RNA amplification Kit (Ambion Inc.) was used to amplify 330 ng RNA for hybridization on Illumina Human-6 v2 BeadChips (Illumina). The data were analyzed with BeadStudio Gene Expression Module v3.3.7 (Illumina) using Illumina's custom rank invariant method. The complete lists of upregulated and downregulated genes are available at ArrayExpress databank with accession number E-TABM-976 (see also Additional file 2, Tables S3, S4).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
ChIP with some modifications was performed according to Upstate Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay protocol (Upstate). Briefly, formaldehyde crosslinking was carried out in PBS containing 1% formaldehyde and 0.5 mM EGTA with the density of 7x107 cells in 70 ml. To process monocyte samples in parallel with macrophages and DCs, monocyte samples were crosslinked, lysed and subjected to sonication in day one and the lysates were kept at 4°C until macrophage and DC samples were collected. About 1x107 cells, 30 μl of packed protein G sepharose beads (GE Healthcare; pre-absorbed with 100 μg/ml BSA and 500 μg/ml of sheared salmon sperm DNA) and 4 μg of H3 (Abcam, ab1791), H3K4me3 (Abcam, ab8580), H3K27me3 (Upstate, 07-449) or AcH3 (Upstate, 06-599) antibodies were used in each immunoprecipitation. DNA probes from ChIP were amplified using GenomePlex Complete Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Kit and reamplified using GenomePlex WGA Reamplification Kit (both from Sigma-Aldrich). NimbleGen Systems using 385K RefSeq Promoters array set performed sample labelling, hybridization and data extraction. The NimbleGen RefSeq Promoter array data is available at ArrayExpress databank with accession number E-TABM-979 (see also Additional file 2, Tables S5, S6).
For conventional ChIP, purified DNA samples were analyzed in triplicate by quantitative PCR (qPCR) as described in . In addition, datasets of each primer pairs were normalized to monocyte H3 values. The primers were designed with MPrimer3 http://bioinfo.ut.ee/mprimer3/ and are shown in Additional file 2, Table S1.
The intensities of the histone H3, H3K4me3, H3K27me3 and AcH3 probes were first normalized to the random genomic background. We additionally normalized the modification intensities by subtracting H3 intensities from the corresponding modification intensities to get specific values for each modification. The normalized values correspond to log2 ratio between corresponding modification and H3 signals. We used the same normalization to find the changes induced by differentiation but then we subtracted the values of probe intensities in monocyte from corresponding probe intensities in macrophage and DCs. Both sets of data were further used to find peaks in the promoters. The peaks were mapped to the genes, where they fell into the range 2000 bp upstream to 500 bp downstream from the transcription start site. The peak scan and assembly with normal RefSeq genes for human genome (HG18, NCBI Build 36) was performed using Nimblescan 2.5 software with default settings. The number of transcript probes in Illumina gene expression matrix was 42620 and the Nimblegen promoter database contained 19222 genes. In the analyses combining gene expression and promoter modification data, the overlap between these two sets (17289 genes) was used. The genes for functional classes were selected from Immunome Database http://bioinf.uta.fi/Immunome/ and the list of transcription factors was accumulated using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software http://www.ingenuity.com/.
The transcription factor analysis was performed using web resource Opossum , which identifies transcription factor binding motifs that are overrepresented in input genes compared to background of all genes. We used only vertebrate motifs that are most conserved from the top 10% of the most conserved regions (minimum conservation 70%). The matrix match threshold was 80% of the maximal match score. The significance threshold was combined from Z-score, calculated assuming binomial distribution of total number of motif occurrences, and Fisher one-tail test p-value, comparing number of promoters having the motif. The corresponding thresholds were 10 for Z-score and 0.01 for Fisher test p-value. The promoters used in this case were from 2000 bp upstream to transcription start site, as this choice was in the best agreement with the tiling chip promoter areas.
The functional profiling for the groups of genes with changes in the studied modifications was carried out using the g:GOSt tool at g:Profiler website http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/ that retrieves most significant Gene Ontology (GO) terms, KEGG and REACTOME pathways .
acetylation of histone H3 lysines
fetal calf serum
granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor
human leukocyte antigen
histone H3 trimethylation of lysine 27
histone H3 trimethylation of lysine 4
peripheral blood mononuclear cell
RNA integrity number
We thank the blood donors for providing the samples and Maire Pihlap for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund and Archimedes Foundation, Estonian Science Foundation (grants 8169, 8358 and 8350), the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research targeted funding SF0180021s07 and Tiger University Program of the Estonian Information Technology Foundation.
- Gordon S, Taylor PR: Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nature reviews. 2005, 5 (12): 953-964. 10.1038/nri1733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leon B, Ardavin C: Monocyte-derived dendritic cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunology and cell biology. 2008, 86 (4): 320-324. 10.1038/icb.2008.14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann F: Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annual review of immunology. 2009, 27: 669-692. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132557.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley K: Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 327 (5966): 656-661. 10.1126/science.1178331.
- Mosser DM, Edwards JP: Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature reviews. 2008, 8 (12): 958-969. 10.1038/nri2448.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reise Sousa C: Dendritic cells in a mature age. Nature reviews. 2006, 6 (6): 476-483.Google Scholar
- Villadangos JA, Schnorrer P: Intrinsic and cooperative antigen-presenting functions of dendritic-cell subsets in vivo. Nature reviews. 2007, 7 (7): 543-555. 10.1038/nri2103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allan RS, Waithman J, Bedoui S, Jones CM, Villadangos JA, Zhan Y, Lew AM, Shortman K, Heath WR, Carbone FR: Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming. Immunity. 2006, 25 (1): 153-162. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leon B, Lopez-Bravo M, Ardavin C: Monocyte-derived dendritic cells formed at the infection site control the induction of protective T helper 1 responses against Leishmania. Immunity. 2007, 26 (4): 519-531. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.01.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ginhoux F, Tacke F, Angeli V, Bogunovic M, Loubeau M, Dai XM, Stanley ER, Randolph GJ, Merad M: Langerhans cells arise from monocytes in vivo. Nature immunology. 2006, 7 (3): 265-273. 10.1038/ni1307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Serbina NV, Pamer EG: Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nature immunology. 2006, 7 (3): 311-317. 10.1038/ni1309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landsman L, Varol C, Jung S: Distinct differentiation potential of blood monocyte subsets in the lung. J Immunol. 2007, 178 (4): 2000-2007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varol C, Landsman L, Fogg DK, Greenshtein L, Gildor B, Margalit R, Kalchenko V, Geissmann F, Jung S: Monocytes give rise to mucosal, but not splenic, conventional dendritic cells. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2007, 204 (1): 171-180. 10.1084/jem.20061011.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ardavin C, Martinez del Hoyo G, Martin P, Anjuere F, Arias CF, Marin AR, Ruiz S, Parrillas V, Hernandez H: Origin and differentiation of dendritic cells. Trends in immunology. 2001, 22 (12): 691-700. 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02059-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A: Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1994, 179 (4): 1109-1118. 10.1084/jem.179.4.1109.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steinman RM, Banchereau J: Taking dendritic cells into medicine. Nature. 2007, 449 (7161): 419-426. 10.1038/nature06175.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tacken PJ, de Vries IJ, Torensma R, Figdor CG: Dendritic-cell immunotherapy: from ex vivo loading to in vivo targeting. Nature reviews. 2007, 7 (10): 790-802. 10.1038/nri2173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kouzarides T: Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007, 128 (4): 693-705. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taverna SD, Li H, Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Patel DJ: How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2007, 14 (11): 1025-1040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein BE, Meissner A, Lander ES: The mammalian epigenome. Cell. 2007, 128 (4): 669-681. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang C, Shapiro LH, Rivera M, Kumar A, Brindle PK: A role for CREB binding protein and p300 transcriptional coactivators in Ets-1 transactivation functions. Molecular and cellular biology. 1998, 18 (4): 2218-2229.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hollenhorst PC, Chandler KJ, Poulsen RL, Johnson WE, Speck NA, Graves BJ: DNA specificity determinants associate with distinct transcription factor functions. PLoS genetics. 2009, 5 (12): e1000778.-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000778.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lehtonen A, Ahlfors H, Veckman V, Miettinen M, Lahesmaa R, Julkunen I: Gene expression profiling during differentiation of human monocytes to macrophages or dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2007, 82 (3): 710-720. 10.1189/jlb.0307194.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Zhao K: The genomic landscape of histone modifications in human T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (43): 15782-15787. 10.1073/pnas.0607617103.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei G, Wei L, Zhu J, Zang C, Hu-Li J, Yao Z, Cui K, Kanno Y, Roh TY, Watford WT, et al: Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. Immunity. 2009, 30 (1): 155-167. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.12.009.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Araki Y, Wang Z, Zang C, Wood WH, Schones D, Cui K, Roh TY, Lhotsky B, Wersto RP, Peng W, et al: Genome-wide analysis of histone methylation reveals chromatin state-based regulation of gene transcription and function of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2009, 30 (6): 912-925. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghisletti S, Barozzi I, Mietton F, Polletti S, De Santa F, Venturini E, Gregory L, Lonie L, Chew A, Wei C-L, et al: Identification and Characterization of Enhancers Controlling the Inflammatory Gene Expression Program in Macrophages. Immunity. 2010, 32 (3): 317-328. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K: High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007, 129 (4): 823-837. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, Wang Z, Wei G, Zhao K: Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell. 2008, 132 (5): 887-898. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guenther MG, Levine SS, Boyer LA, Jaenisch R, Young RA: A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell. 2007, 130 (1): 77-88. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao XD, Han X, Chew JL, Liu J, Chiu KP, Choo A, Orlov YL, Sung WK, Shahab A, Kuznetsov VA, et al: Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007, 1 (3): 286-298. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colobran R, Pujol-Borrell R, Armengol MP, Juan M: The chemokine network. I. How the genomic organization of chemokines contains clues for deciphering their functional complexity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007, 148 (2): 208-217. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03344.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R: Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature. 2007, 447 (7147): 972-978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Org T, Rebane A, Kisand K, Laan M, Haljasorg U, Andreson R, Peterson P: AIRE activated tissue specific genes have histone modifications associated with inactive chromatin. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18 (24): 4699-4710. 10.1093/hmg/ddp433.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MPrimer3. [http://bioinfo.ut.ee/mprimer3/]
- Ortutay C, Vihinen M: Immunome: a reference set of genes and proteins for systems biology of the human immune system. Cell Immunol. 2006, 244 (2): 87-89. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.01.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. [http://www.ingenuity.com/]
- Ho Sui SJ, Mortimer JR, Arenillas DJ, Brumm J, Walsh CJ, Kennedy BP, Wasserman WW: oPOSSUM: identification of over-represented transcription factor binding sites in co-expressed genes. Nucleic acids research. 2005, 33 (10): 3154-3164. 10.1093/nar/gki624.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- g:Profiler. [http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/]
- Reimand J, Kull M, Peterson H, Hansen J, Vilo J: g:Profiler--a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic acids research. 2007, W193-200. 10.1093/nar/gkm226. 35 Web Server
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.