Open Access

Building a model: developing genomic resources for common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) with low coverage genome sequencing

  • Shannon CK Straub1Email author,
  • Mark Fishbein2,
  • Tatyana Livshultz3,
  • Zachary Foster1,
  • Matthew Parks1,
  • Kevin Weitemier1,
  • Richard C Cronn4 and
  • Aaron Liston1
BMC Genomics201112:211

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-211

Received: 26 February 2011

Accepted: 4 May 2011

Published: 4 May 2011

Abstract

Background

Milkweeds (Asclepias L.) have been extensively investigated in diverse areas of evolutionary biology and ecology; however, there are few genetic resources available to facilitate and compliment these studies. This study explored how low coverage genome sequencing of the common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) could be useful in characterizing the genome of a plant without prior genomic information and for development of genomic resources as a step toward further developing A. syriaca as a model in ecology and evolution.

Results

A 0.5× genome of A. syriaca was produced using Illumina sequencing. A virtually complete chloroplast genome of 158,598 bp was assembled, revealing few repeats and loss of three genes: accD, clpP, and ycf1. A nearly complete rDNA cistron (18S-5.8S-26S; 7,541 bp) and 5S rDNA (120 bp) sequence were obtained. Assessment of polymorphism revealed that the rDNA cistron and 5S rDNA had 0.3% and 26.7% polymorphic sites, respectively. A partial mitochondrial genome sequence (130,764 bp), with identical gene content to tobacco, was also assembled. An initial characterization of repeat content indicated that Ty1/copia-like retroelements are the most common repeat type in the milkweed genome. At least one A. syriaca microread hit 88% of Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae) unigenes (median coverage of 0.29×) and 66% of single copy orthologs (COSII) in asterids (median coverage of 0.14×). From this partial characterization of the A. syriaca genome, markers for population genetics (microsatellites) and phylogenetics (low-copy nuclear genes) studies were developed.

Conclusions

The results highlight the promise of next generation sequencing for development of genomic resources for any organism. Low coverage genome sequencing allows characterization of the high copy fraction of the genome and exploration of the low copy fraction of the genome, which facilitate the development of molecular tools for further study of a target species and its relatives. This study represents a first step in the development of a community resource for further study of plant-insect co-evolution, anti-herbivore defense, floral developmental genetics, reproductive biology, chemical evolution, population genetics, and comparative genomics using milkweeds, and A. syriaca in particular, as ecological and evolutionary models.

Background

The advent of next generation sequencing technology has presented the opportunity to obtain genome-scale data for any organism [13]. Detailed information about the characteristics of the genome of a non-model organism, especially the high-copy fraction, can be obtained even with very low overall coverage of a genome [46]. Repeat types can be characterized to assess the presence and prevalence of retrotransposons, DNA transposons, and other simple and low-complexity repeats [e.g., [4, 7, 8]]. Nearly complete sequences of organellar genomes are also readily obtained [e.g., [4, 914]]. If genomic resources are available for a close relative, a portion of the gene space of the nuclear genome might also be surveyed [12]. In contrast to the above studies, next generation sequencing in non-model organisms has thus far primarily been used for characterization of transcriptomes [3] and as a tool for marker development in population and conservation genetics [e.g., [15, 16]], phylogenetics [10, 17], and other areas of evolutionary biology [e.g., [18]].

As the most intensively studied member of a genus that has been investigated extensively in diverse areas of evolutionary biology and ecology [e.g., [1924]], the common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L., Apocynaceae) is an attractive non-model target for the development of genomic resources. Interest in the genus has been focused on complex and specialized floral structures, particularly as they relate to insect pollination [21], and on the remarkable chemical ecology exemplified by cardenolide-sequestering specialist herbivores, such as the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), that utilize Asclepias defense compounds to defend themselves against their own predators [25]. In the context of floral biology and plant-insect coevolution, Asclepias has the potential to add substantially to existing ecological and evolutionary model systems (e.g., Arabidopsis, Mimulus, Aquilegia), although genomic resources for Asclepias are currently far more limiting than for these model systems. Genomic resources have been developed for only two other species in the same order (Gentianales) as Asclepias: coffee (Coffea;http://www.coffeegenome.org) and Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus: Apocynaceae), for which there are expressed sequence tag (EST) collections [2628].

The aims of this study were to demonstrate how a small amount of Illumina short read sequence data could be useful for whole genome characterization of a plant species with no prior genomic information and to develop genomic resources for milkweeds. To these ends, the genome of Asclepias syriaca was characterized using 0.5× sequence coverage obtained from a single lane of 40 bp Illumina reads. Reference-guided assembly was used to assemble and characterize the high copy fraction of the A. syriaca genome, including the complete chloroplast and partial mitochondrial genomes and a nearly complete nuclear ribosomal DNA cistron and 5S rDNA sequence. De novo assemblies were used to characterize the repeat structure of the genome and to develop nuclear markers consisting of low-copy nuclear loci for phylogenetics and microsatellite loci for population genetics. This study highlights the extent to which a non-model plant genome can be characterized with low coverage genome sequencing and represents the first step in developing the resources needed to develop Asclepias as a new genetic model system in ecological and evolutionary studies [29].

Methods

Genome size estimation

Leaves were collected from five A. syriaca individuals from an experimental agricultural population in western Illinois and frozen at -20°C. Samples of approximately 3×3 mm green leaf tissue were chopped in 150 μl Partec CysStain UV Precise P Nuclei extraction buffer (made 1.0% w/v PVP-40; Partec North America, Inc., Swedesboro, NJ, USA) on ice in the presence of (~8×8 mm) B-73 maize (1C = 2.725 pg) leaf tissue as internal reference. Upon filtering and addition of 600 μl CysStain UV Precise P Staining Buffer, samples were run on a Partec PA flow cytometer until at least 1000 counts were recorded for both the sample and reference peaks. The estimated DNA content values for the five individuals were averaged and the genome size calculated using a standard conversion factor [30].

Illumina library preparation and sequencing

Leaf tissue was sampled from a single individual from a natural population of A. syriaca in Ogle County, Illinois [Fishbein 4885 (OKLA)]. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following homogenization of 100 mg of silica-dried tissue flash-frozen in liquid N2 and ground with mortar and pestle. A BioRuptor Sonicator (Diagenode Inc., Denville, NJ, USA) was used to shear 2.5 μg of the extracted DNA using 15 one min cycles (30 sec on/30 sec off, setting 'high', 4°C). Subsequent library preparation followed the standard multi-step Illumina protocol [31]. Ligated, size-selected fragments (~280 - 320 bp) were amplified through 18 cycles of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and standard Illumina primers. Resulting product concentrations were determined using a Nanodrop 1000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Enriched, cleaned product was diluted to 5 pM and submitted for sequencing on an Illumina GAII sequencer at the Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing (CGRB) at Oregon State University (Corvallis, OR, USA). Denaturation, cluster generation, and subsequent sequencing followed the manufacturer's recommendations. Sequencing was completed over 40 cycles on a single lane of the Illumina GAII. Image analysis, base-calling and error estimation were performed using the Illumina GA Pipeline version 1.5. Images were collected from 120 tiles, averaging over 107,000 clusters/tile, and resulted in over 420 Mbp of sequence data after quality filtering.

Reference-guided assembly

Reference-guided assembly of microreads was facilitated using a pipeline of five open source scripts called "alignreads." The pipeline incorporates: YASRA [32], a short read assembler; NUCMER, an aligner from the MUMmer 3.0 suite [33, 34]; delta-filter, a utility program from the MUMmer 3.0 suite that removes excessive/erroneous alignments; "sumqual," a python script created to integrate the NUCMER alignment information with the YASRA assembly information; and "qualtofa," another python script that reformats and filters the output of sumqual based on user inputs. A consensus sequence of the aligned contigs is produced, which can be masked based on base call proportion and coverage depth; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be masked similarly using separate user specifications. Scripts are available for download at http://milkweedgenome.org. Read depth was determined by calculating median base sequencing depth from the alignreads output.

Chloroplast Genome

The reference-guided assembly of the chloroplast genome was completed in alignreads using the chloroplast genome sequence of oleander (Nerium oleander: Apocynaceae; M. Moore and D. Soltis, unpublished data; see [17] for coding sequences) with only one copy of the inverted repeat included as the reference and no masking. A second alignment of the YASRA contigs was completed using Mulan [35], and the resulting consensus sequence was compared to the alignreads output and tested as an alternate reference input for alignreads. All of the consensus sequences were aligned to each other and the oleander reference using MAFFT 6.240 [36]. A preliminary annotation of the A. syriaca chloroplast genome was completed using DOGMA [37]. The annotations of protein coding regions, ribosomal DNA (rDNA), and sequences corresponding to transfer RNAs (tRNAs) were improved by fixing annotation and assembly mistakes (e.g., no start or stop codon, internal stop codons, frameshifts, endpoints of tRNA sequences) through examination of the actual assembly of the short reads at that location in Tablet vers. 1.10.09.20 [38] and/or comparisons to ortholog sequences from other asterids obtained from NCBI GenBank (e.g., Nerium, Coffea, Solanum). Various versions of the chloroplast genome sequence were used as a reference in alignreads to further refine the sequence based on new assemblies. Discrepancies between the assembly consensus sequences in introns and intergenic spacers were explored at the microread-level in Tablet to identify the correct sequence. An Asclepias tuberosa sequence [GenBank:GQ248251.1] served as a reference in alignreads to correctly assemble the trnH - psbA region.

In order to produce the highest quality A. syriaca chloroplast genome sequence and annotation, the consensus sequences were also aligned to chloroplast genome sequences for other individuals of A. syriaca produced in alignreads and Velvet 1.0.12 [39] based on either 80 bp single end or paired end Illumina sequences (S. Straub and A. Liston, unpublished data). Discrepancies between the consensus sequences from these assemblies and the original consensus sequences were resolved as either intraspecific variation, assembly or alignment errors in the 40 bp read data set, or unresolved assembly errors. Informatically unresolved errors (e.g., AT-rich repeats) were corrected by obtaining Sanger sequences spanning those regions. Gene sequences that were expected to be divergent from the reference (e.g., ycf1) and putative pseudogenes were also checked by Sanger sequencing. PCR reactions contained ~10-20 ng template DNA and had a final concentration of 1× Phusion® Flash High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (Finnzymes) and 0.2 μM of primer. PCR cycling conditions were 98°C for 30 s followed by 25 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, primer set specific annealing temperature for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension of 72°C for 5 min. See Table 1 for primer sequences and annealing temperatures. Cycling extension times were increased to 60 s and final extension times to 10 min for accD and clpP. Cycling extension times were increased to 90 s and final extension times to 10 min for ycf1-ndhF and rps15-ycf1. The success of PCR reactions was confirmed using agarose gel electrophoresis. The chloroplast and mitochondrial paralogs of accD were co-amplified, bands excised from a 1.2% agarose gel, and purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Inc.). Due to low yield, the mitochondrial product was re-amplified using 1 μl of extract as PCR template prior to sequencing. For additional chloroplast accD sequencing, the mitochondrial product was virtually eliminated from the PCR pool by raising the annealing temperature to 61°C. Sequences were produced using standard dye termination techniques by High-Throughput Sequencing Solutions at the University of Washington http://www.htseq.org or the Oregon State University CGRB. The quality of the finished A. syriaca chloroplast genome sequence was assessed by using it as the reference sequence in alignreads to re-assemble the 40 bp reads and any discrepancies were explored and corrected.
Table 1

Primers used for Sanger sequence finishing of the Asclepias syriaca chloroplast genome

Region spanned

Orientation

Primer Sequence (5'-3')

Annealing Temp. (°C)

ndhC-trnV

FORWARD

GCTCGATTCGAATTGTCAAGTCATCC

57

 

REVERSE

AGGCCCTCCGATAGGATACTCAAA

 

trnQ-psbK

FORWARD

AAACCCGTTGCCTTACCACTTG

57

 

REVERSE

CACGGGTATGACTGGCATAACATC

 

rbcL-accD

FORWARD

ATCCGTGAGGCTAGCAAATGGAGT

59

 

REVERSE

AGGCCCTAGTCCACCAATATGGAA

 

accD

FORWARD

TAATAAACAATGCTAGCGATTGGG

57, 61

 

REVERSE

TACAATTAGATCTTAGGTCGCCAA

 
 

FORWARD

GAACCTACACGCAAGCTAGTG

 
 

FORWARD

TAAATGGCATTCCCATAGCAGT

 
 

FORWARD

TGATATCGATGCGCAAGCTAG

 
 

REVERSE

CCTATAAATGTAACTAGCACTGCA

 
 

REVERSE

GGTAGCGTATTCAATCAAACGG

 
 

REVERSE

CCAAGTATCCGGATCGATCGA

 

clpP

FORWARD

AATTGTATACATAATGGGCTGGT

57

 

REVERSE

TATTTATTCATTGCCCTGTTCGT

 
 

FORWARD

AACTACTATGATGGCTCCGTTG

 
 

FORWARD

CATAAGACCCATAATTTGATTTGAG

 
 

FORWARD

GTTTATGCTGTACTCCGGGTA

 
 

REVERSE

GGTCAATTTTATTGTAAAGCCGTAT

 
 

REVERSE

TATGCAATTTATAAAACCAGATGTCC

 
 

REVERSE

GTGAATTGAAAAAGTAGAACGTCAT

 

rps8 -rpl14

FORWARD

CTCAGCAATAGTGTCTCTGCCCAT

57

 

REVERSE

AGAGCTGTAATTGTGCGTACCCGT

 

ycf1-ndhF

FORWARD

TCCATCCATATCCCAATTCCATTCA

55

 

REVERSE

GGGCATTAGAGGATTGGCTAAAGT

 
 

FORWARD

ACGCCTCTGCATCTAGTATTG

 
 

REVERSE

GGATCTTTTGTCGAGAGCTTC

 

ndhG-ndhI

FORWARD

ATGCGGGCGGGTTGATATATGGTT

59

 

REVERSE

ATTGCTTTGGGTCGGTTACCAACGTC

 

rps15-ycf1

FORWARD

GGCCTAATTGATACCTCAGCGGTT

58

 

REVERSE

TTATCAACGATGGAACCGCCCACT

 
 

FORWARD

TATGTCTCGGTCTAGGAGAGG

 
 

REVERSE

TGTACAAGTTGATTCAGGCGA

 

For each region, additional primers appearing after the two original PCR primers are internal sequencing primers.

The final annotation of the A. syriaca chloroplast genome was accomplished using BioEdit 7.0.5.3 [40] and visualized using GenomeVx [41]. The repeat content of the chloroplast genome was determined using the NCBI BLAST tool blast2seq. Only repeat motifs of greater than 30 bp and 85% sequence identity were characterized. Sequence identities were calculated in BioEdit on sequence alignments produced in MAFFT with the gapped positions removed. Ka/Ks values for pseudogenes were calculated using the Bergen Center for Computational Science Ka/Ks calculation tool http://services.cbu.uib.no/tools/kaks.

Mitochondrial Genome

The mitochondrial genome of A. syriaca was assembled using the alignreads pipeline and the 430,597 bp mitochondrial genome sequence of Nicotiana tabacum [GenBank:BA000042.1] [42] as a reference. Mitofy [43] was used to characterize the complement of protein coding, rRNA, and tRNA genes in the resulting contigs. The annotation of the mitochondrial genome of N. tabacum was updated using Mitofy before comparison of the gene content of the two genomes. BLAT [44] under default parameters was used to estimate the percentage of each A. syriaca mitochondrial gene assembled by calculating the proportion of the total length of the N. tabacum mitochondrial genes with hits in the A. syriaca contigs. The presence or absence of the cox1 group I intron in Asclepias was determined by using the Hoya sikkimensis (Apocynaceae) cox1 sequence [GenBank:AJ247588.1] as a BLAT reference.

Ribosomal DNA

The nuclear rDNA cistron, including 18S, 5.8S, and 26S, was assembled in alignreads using a 669 bp partial sequence from A. syriaca [GenBank:AM396892] spanning the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) as the reference. Following the initial assembly, the assembly was repeated using the reverse complement of the reference sequence as the new reference to correct for an inconsistency in YASRA that caused the assembly result to be strand specific. A consensus sequence of the contigs obtained through the first two analyses was then used as the reference for a final assembly. A 5S rDNA sequence for A. syriaca was assembled using a 330 bp sequence including the 5S locus from Solanum iopetalum [GenBank:AJ226045] as a reference in both the forward and reverse directions.

To assess intragenomic polymorphism, the complete genomic read pool was filtered for reads matching the consensus sequences of the assembled rDNA loci using BLAT and custom scripts [45]. Reads were discarded if their average Phred score was less than 20, and the remaining reads filtered so that any base in a read with a Phred score less than 20 was converted to 'N' using the FASTX-Toolkit [46]. Modified reads were assembled against the reference sequence using BWA [47], and at each position the number of reads differing from the consensus was tallied and a proportion calculated (script available from KW). In order to estimate the error introduced by the sequencing method, the same procedure was applied to the PhiX174 control lane of the sequencing run.

Positions with 2% or more of reads differing from the consensus were considered to represent true polymorphism. This cutoff is comparable to error rates previously found using a similar quality-filtering scheme [48], but may be somewhat conservative as it is much higher than the error seen in the PhiX lane. See additional file 1: Polymorphism detected among Illumina reads for the PhiX sequencing control. All positions of the PhiX genome exhibited <0.7% differing reads except position 3132, which had >17% of reads differing from the consensus. While the reason for this anomaly is uncertain, the overall average error rate in the PhiX lane is <0.05%.

De novo assembly

Data Quality Control

Perl scripts were used to remove microreads containing N's and those reads corresponding to Illumina adapter sequences from the chastity-filtered short read pool to create a cleaned read pool [45]. The remaining reads were trimmed of bases of low quality or unscorable quality (quality score "B" in Illumina fastq files) and all bases subsequent to these bases to produce a cleaned and trimmed read pool [45].

De novo assembly of the cleaned read pool was performed using VelvetOptimiser 2.1.7 [49] and Velvet 1.0.12 with the minimum contig length set to 100 bp. Hash lengths between 19 and 31 were screened to find the optimal hash length for maximizing the total bases included in contigs. The expected coverage and the optimum coverage cutoff were estimated by VelvetOptimiser to be 2 and 0.3777216 respectively. This analysis was repeated for the cleaned and trimmed read pool. Use of the cleaned read pool resulted in more total bases in contigs; therefore this pool was used for all downstream de novo analyses. In order to further characterize the A. syriaca nuclear genome, BLAT was used to remove reads corresponding to nuclear rDNA and the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes using the sequences generated through reference guided assembly. The de novo assembly was repeated to produce the set of contigs used for the non-rDNA repetitive element categorization and microsatellite marker development. The organellar genome and rDNA BLAT analyses were also used to estimate the percentage of overall reads corresponding to the high copy fraction of the genome.

Repetitive Element Characterization

Non-ribosomal nuclear repetitive elements were characterized by submitting the de novo contigs to the MAKER [50] web annotation service http://www.yandell-lab.org/software/mwas.html and categorizing the RepeatMasker [51] output from the MAKER run. The percentage of unique read hits to these contigs was determined using BLAT, with minimum sequence identity set to 70%, to find hits to the contigs of putative DNA transposon or retrotransposon origin. The overall percentage of reads corresponding to known repetitive elements was calculated using BLAT (minimum sequence identity = 70%) to determine the number of reads that hit the Viridiplantae repeat sequences downloaded from the Repbase Update release 15.07 database [52].

Microsatellite Marker Development
De novo contigs of at least 150 bp, to allow for sufficient flanking sequence for primer design, were scanned for microsatellites using BatchPrimer3 [53]. Primers were designed flanking perfect di- and trinucleotide repeats of four or more repeat units and perfect tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats of three or more repeat units such that the PCR amplicon sizes ranged between 100 and 450 bp and primers met the default criteria for SSRs primers (Table 2; also see additional file 2: Primer sets designed using BatchPrimer3 for 184 nuclear microsatellite loci in Asclepias syriaca not tested for amplification success). Contigs containing at least one microsatellite locus for which primers could be designed were submitted to the PLAN web service [54], with the 'DNA to DNA: blastn against NCBI NT 20081206 database, top 10 hits with e < = 0.1 cut-off' option selected, in order to check if any chloroplast or mitochondrial sequences had not been eliminated from the read pool used to generate the de novo contigs. To produce the best set of primers for candidate nuclear microsatellite locus development, those primer sets originating from contigs with a chloroplast or mitochondrial BLAST [55] hit with an E-value of 1e-5 or lower were removed from the candidate pool.
Table 2

Primers, PCR reaction conditions, and characteristics of microsatellite loci tested for amplification success in Asclepias syriaca

Primer Set Name

Orientation

Primer Sequence (5'-3')

Annealing Temp. (°C)

Repeat Motif

Product Size (bp)

As104467

FORWARD

ACTTTTTGTTCTGTTCCGAGT

52.9

TA6

100

 

REVERSE

CGGGGCTAGTATAGAAGAAGA

   

As106994

FORWARD

AGGAAGCCAATTCAAGTAAAG

48.9

GA5

129

 

REVERSE

GAAAATCCTTGCATGAAACT

   

As12122

FORWARD

TTGGTTGTTGGAACTTACACT

50.4

ATTC4

115

 

REVERSE

AAGCACAAGAATCAGAACAAT

   

As125636

FORWARD

GAACTCCTATGATCTTTCATTT

50.8

TC4...TA4*

136

 

REVERSE

AGACATCATGAACCCTCTTTA

   

As12641

FORWARD

CTCTTCATCTGGTTTCTCTTG

49.0

TA4

130

 

REVERSE

TGCATACAAATTTAGGTGATTC

   

As13110

FORWARD

AACCATAAATGCAGGTTCTTT

50.9

TA4

101

 

REVERSE

GCATATCTAGCTCGCATTTAG

   

As16135

FORWARD

TTAGGTTGTGAGAAGGGATTT

50.3

CCT4

100

 

REVERSE

GCTTTTATTAATGTGGGAGGA

   

As16369

FORWARD

AACGCTTATCCCTCACTTTAC

51.5

TA5

100

 

REVERSE

CCGAACTCTATATGAGTCCAAT

   

As196582

FORWARD

GCATTTATTGCATTGTCAAA

50.5

TGA5

113

 

REVERSE

GCCGTTGTTCCTCTATAATTT

   

As2003a

FORWARD

CCCTCGTTATTGAGAAAATAGA

50.5

ATA5

105

 

REVERSE

GGCTCTTACCAAAGAAAAGAT

   

As20679a

FORWARD

GTCATCGGAAGCTCTTTTC

52.7

CTT4

104

 

REVERSE

AGTCAAAAGTCACACTCATCTG

   

As2338

FORWARD

CATCTTGGTTAGCTCGTAAAC

51.7

TC5

104

 

REVERSE

CCTTACCTAGGATGAAAGGAG

   

As23491a

FORWARD

ATTTCCTCCATTTGTTCTTTC

50.0

TC5

101

 

REVERSE

GAAGTTTGTCTGAAATGGTTG

   

As2366

FORWARD

TTGGTGTTGTAAAGTGTTCCT

54.5

TA5

101

 

REVERSE

ACCAGCTCGTCAGTCAAG

   

As23942

FORWARD

GTGATTTCCATTTTACCATACC

51.7

AG5

100

 

REVERSE

ATCCTTAGCAAATAGGAGTCG

   

As23961

FORWARD

ACTCTTGTTATTTTGGGGAAT

49.3

TG5

108

 

REVERSE

CAAAAGCTTTACACGATCAAT

   

As282930

FORWARD

AACTTAGCTTTGGATGATGTTT

50.1

TAA4

102

 

REVERSE

CAATTGGGCTTGTATATCAGA

   

As28460

FORWARD

CACAAGATGAACATCAAAACC

49.6

AT5

100

 

REVERSE

TTGAGTATATTTGTTCCCCAAT

   

As292191

FORWARD

GGAGGGTCTAATGTCTGATGT

51.3

TG5

125

 

REVERSE

ATTCACACATCCCATACCAT

   

As43163

FORWARD

TATTCCAAGAAATTGGTCAAC

49.7

TTA4

110

 

REVERSE

CATGGAAGAAGAACAAAACAG

   

As5768

FORWARD

AAGGGAAATGATCCTTAGGTA

51.0

AG6

108

 

REVERSE

TTCGAAAGAGTTCCACATCTA

   

As71725

FORWARD

TTTACGACTCATGTACTCTTCC

50.8

AG4...TG5*

133

 

REVERSE

GTAATACCGGAAAATGACCTC

   

As77693

FORWARD

GTCAGTCAACTCAACAATGCT

51.0

TC6

102

 

REVERSE

TCCCAAAACTCAGATCTAACA

   

As81784

FORWARD

AATGTAAAGGGAGATGTTTATCA

52.0

TAT4

129

 

REVERSE

AGCATCAAGAACTTGAACAGA

   

As99212

FORWARD

TCTATGGTCAACAATTTCTGC

53.4

AT5

153

 

REVERSE

TTTATAGGGGTAGCGTAGGTG

   

*Repeat motifs are separated by 27 bp for primer set As71725 and 46 bp for primer set As125636.

Primers were tested for amplification success for the 25 top candidate loci, which were selected for having the highest number of repeat units among all candidates. PCR amplification was conducted on genomic DNA of the same A. syriaca accession used for genome sequencing in 50 μl reactions. Each reaction consisted of 1 μl DNA extract template, 1.25 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase and 1× Green Flexi Reaction Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, and 0.8 mM amplification primers. PCR was carried out in a C1000™ thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec-variable annealing temperature for 30 sec-72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. See Table 2 for annealing temperatures. Amplicons of the predicted size were confirmed using agarose gel electrophoresis.

Nuclear genome characterization and development of low copy nuclear markers

In order to provide an initial characterization of nuclear gene content and coverage, all 19,899 available ESTs for Catharanthus roseus were downloaded from GenBank on 29 November 2010. See additional file 3: List of GI numbers for 19,899 Catharanthus roseus ESTs downloaded from GenBank and assembled into unigenes. The sequences were subjected to simple cleaning in SeqClean (Dana Farber Cancer Institute; available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/seqclean). Cleaned and trimmed sequences were assembled into unigenes using iAssembler v1.2 (available at http://bioinfo.bti.cornell.edu/tool/iAssembler). Unigenes with BLAT hits corresponding to the rDNA or chloroplast or mitochondrial genomes of A. syriaca were excluded from this set. Simple repeats, low complexity sequences, and long terminal repeats were masked in the remaining unigenes using the RepeatMasker web service [[51]; available at http://www.repeatmasker.org/cgi-bin/WEBRepeatMasker]. BLAT with a tile size of 7 and minimum sequence identity of 80% was used to find read hits to the remaining putatively nuclear masked unigenes. The number of unique microread hits per unigene was used to calculate the hits per kb of sequence based on the length of gene. Coverage for these genes was then estimated using the formula [(hits per kb of sequence × length of the microread)/1000]. Coverage is overestimated when reads overlap. JMP 9.0.0 (SAS Institute, Inc.) was used to calculate coverage distributions. A Monte Carlo resampler implemented in PopTools [56] was used to calculate 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (1,000 iterations) for median hits per kb and coverage values.

With low genome coverage, few if any single-copy nuclear genes were expected to have been assembled in de novo contigs. In order to extract useful information for nuclear marker development from the unassembled, uncleaned pool of reads and further explore the A. syriaca gene space, BLAT with a tile size of 7 and minimum sequence identity of 80% was used to find reads that hit alignments for 1,086 single-copy orthologs from other asterids [e.g., tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), pepper (Capsicum annuum), coffee (Coffea canephora)] and Arabidopsis thaliana [COS II markers; [57]]. The average length of sequences included in each alignment was used as the gene length in subsequent calculations, which were completed as described above for the Catharanthus unigene set.

The COSII pool of candidate genes was most appropriate for the development of markers intended for phylogenetics because single-copy genes are preferred in order to avoid ortholog/paralog conflation. MAFFT 6.240 was used to align the Asclepias microreads with the COSII alignments using the localpair option and 1,000 cycles of iterative refinement. Primers were designed in exons flanking the putative locations of one or more introns based on the location of introns in A. thaliana indicated by the Sol Genomics Network's intron finder application http://solgenomics.net/tools/intron_detection/find_introns.pl for genes with 0.5× or greater coverage (Table 3). If possible, primers were designed with GC clamps and were chosen from sections of the read identical to or highly similar to the coffee sequence without mismatches near the 3' end of the primer sequence.
Table 3

Primers designed from Asclepias syriaca microreads hitting COSII alignments

Primer Set Name

Orientation

Primer Sequence (5'-3')

Annealing Temp. (°C)

At1g24360a

FORWARD

GCAAGATCATCAAAGGAGGCA

59.0

 

REVERSE

GATTTAGATCAATAACCTCCTGCCA

 

At1g24360b

FORWARD

GGAGGTTATTGATCTAAATCTCAC

56.3

 

REVERSE

AACAAGGCCAACAACTGATG

 

At1g24360c

FORWARD

CAATTACAGTGCTGCAAAAGCTG

60.0

 

REVERSE

CATATCAGATGCAATGAATCCGGG

 

At1g44760a

FORWARD

TACTCATGTTACTAATAAGGGTGA

-

 

REVERSE

CTTTGCTTTGCTTCCTCACTC

 

At1g55880a

FORWARD

ATGTACACAAAAGAGGAGGCTG

54.0

 

REVERSE

GATGCCTCATCCCACTATCAC

 

At1g77370a

FORWARD

CCAAAGCGCCATCTACTCCA

60.0

 

REVERSE

GGCCAACCAAATCCAGAAGAAT

 

At2g03120a

FORWARD

GAAGGTAGATCCAAATTTGAATGTC

58.0

 

REVERSE

GCAAGTCAACACAGCATTAAC

 

At2g06530a

FORWARD

GTGAAGGTAATGGCCAAAGATC

58.0

 

REVERSE

GTAACACCTTTCATTGCTTCTCC

 

At2g21960a

FORWARD

ATTGGGGTTTCTTTGTTCCATAC

53.0

 

REVERSE

GCAGATTGGCCAACAACTTTG

 

At2g21960b

FORWARD

GTTGTTGGCCAATCTGCAGA

59.0

 

REVERSE

TTTGTTGCTGATCTTTGCTAAGC

 

At2g30200a

FORWARD

ACAAGCTGTTGGAATGGGTG

55.0

 

REVERSE

ATCTCAACTGCAGCTAAGCTG

 

At2g30200b

FORWARD

ATCTATGTCACCAGCTTAGCTG

58.3

 

REVERSE

TTTGAATGATTTTGCCTTTGCTTC

 

At2g30200c

FORWARD

CAAAGGCAAAATCATTCAAAGC

56.3

 

REVERSE

TGCATCAACATTTGATATTACTGG

 

At2g34620a

FORWARD

TTCAGAAAGGTCATCAACAAATG

57.8

 

REVERSE

GCTGAAAGTGAACAAACCTGG

 

At2g34620b

FORWARD

TGCCAACATTTCTTTACAATTCAAG

52.0

 

REVERSE

none

 

At2g47390a

FORWARD

GTCTTGGTACAAAACACGCAAG

59.0

 

REVERSE

TCAGTTTTAGATTCTTTAGAGGTAAG

 

At2g47390b

FORWARD

CTAATGAGTTTGCTGGCATTGG

-

 

REVERSE

CACCATGTCCTTTGAGTGCG

 

At4g13430a

FORWARD

GAGCAAAACATAAAGTACTTCTA

48.0

 

REVERSE

CATTTCACCATCCATAACAA

 

At4g13430b

FORWARD

GTGCCTCCAACATTGAGATTTG

59.0

 

REVERSE

CATTCTCTAGCCAAAGCACGA

 

At4g13430c

FORWARD

GTGCTTTGGCTAGAGAATGCA

60.0

 

REVERSE

CAAGACAAGCACCACAACTAGG

 

At4g26750a

FORWARD

GCCTGATGACCATTTACATCTTG

-

 

REVERSE

TACAGGTCTCCTCCCTTCTTTC

 

At5g13420a

FORWARD

TGGTATGACAACCTGTGCCG

55.0

 

REVERSE

GTATCATCAGCAAGTCTTGGTGAA

 

At5g13420b

FORWARD

CTCCATGCGTCCCTTCAATC

60.5

 

REVERSE

TGGCACCTTTCTTCACCAGAG

 

At5g23540a

FORWARD

GTGTTGAAGCGGTTGATCATG

-

 

REVERSE

TCCATCTGTCCATTTTTTCTTATGA

 

At5g23540b

FORWARD

none

52.0

 

REVERSE

AAGGCATCAATTACCACTTTCC

 

At5g49970a

FORWARD

GTAGCTGCTCGTCATTTATATC

55.8

 

REVERSE

GAGAATCCAAACATTGCATCA

 

At5g49970b

FORWARD

TTGATGCAATGTTTGGATTCTC

57.8

 

REVERSE

GGCACACAATTTTGGAGCAG

 

Multiple primer sets were designed for loci where multiple read hits allowed potential amplification of different introns. Primer set names correspond to the orthologs of these genes in Arabidopsis. Listed annealing temperatures were used in amplifications of Asclepias samples. An annealing temperature of 55°C was used for all loci for amplifications of other Apocynaceae samples.

The primers designed using the A. syriaca microreads were tested for amplification success and their utility in phylogenetic studies of Asclepias and across Apocynaceae. Vouchers for all DNA samples used are listed in Table 4. DNA was extracted as described above for A. syriaca. PCR amplification was conducted in 50 μl reactions on genomic DNA of the same A. syriaca accession used for genome sequencing, 16 accessions of 13 other species of American Asclepias, including four accessions of two morphotypes of A. pringlei, one species of Gomphocarpus belonging to the sister clade to American Asclepias, and one sample each of successive sister groups to the clade including Asclepias and Gomphocarpus (Calotropis and Pergularia). Each reaction consisted of 1 μl template DNA extract, 1.25 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase and 1× Green Flexi Reaction Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, and 0.8 mM amplification primers. PCR was carried out in a C1000™ thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 94°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec-variable annealing temperature for 30 sec-72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. See Table 3 for primer sequences and annealing temperatures.
Table 4

Herbarium voucher specimens for DNA samples included in the COSII marker screen

Species

Voucher

Provenance

Alyxia grandis P.I. Forst.

D. J. Middleton 703 [A]

Australia

Alyxia oblongata Domin.

D. J. Middleton 702 [A]

Australia

Asclepias californica Greene ssp. californica

Lynch 10,779 [LSUS]

USA. California. San Bernardino Co.

Asclepias connivens Baldwin ex Elliott

Lynch 12,350 [LSUS]

USA. Florida

Asclepias coulteri A. Gray

Fishbein 5172 [OKLA]

Mexico. Querértaro. Mpio. Landa

Asclepias cryptoceras S. Watson ssp. davisii

Fishbein 5723 [OKLA]

USA. Oregon. Crook Co.

Asclepias fascicularis Decne.

Fishbein 5886 [OKLA]

USA. California. Siskiyou Co.

Asclepias glaucescens Kunth

Lynch 14,142 [LSUS]

Mexico. Oaxaca

Asclepias oenotheroides Schltdl. & Cham.

Lynch 13,339 [LSUS]

USA. Texas

Asclepias otarioides E. Fourn.

Fishbein 5857 [OKLA]

Mexico. Distrito Federal. Del. Tlalpan

Asclepias pringlei (Greenm.) Woodson

Fishbein 5845 [OKLA]

Mexico. Zacatecas. Mpio. Tlaltenango

Asclepias pringlei

Ventura 2807 [ARIZ]

Mexico. Distrito Federal. Del. Milpa Alta

Asclepias aff. pringlei

Fishbein 5119 [OKLA]

Mexico. Michoacán. Mpio. Coalcomán

Asclepias aff. pringlei

Fishbein 5175 [OKLA]

Mexico. Querétaro. Mpio. Pinal de Amoles

Asclepias sanjuanensis K.D. Heil, J.M. Porter & S.L. Welsh

Ellison s.n. [OKLA]

USA. New Mexico. San Juan Co.

Asclepias stenophylla A. Gray

Fishbein 5394 [OKLA]

USA. Colorado. Boulder Co.

Asclepias subulata Decne.

Fishbein 3147 [WS]

Baja California Sur. Mpio. Comondú

Asclepias viridis Walter

Lynch 13,072 [LSUS]

USA. Texas

Baissea multiflora A. DC.

F. Billiet S3853 [BR]

Cultivated. Belgium. Nat. Bot. Gard. Belgium

Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Aiton

Fishbein 5472 [OKLA]

Cultivated

Epigynum auritum (C.K. Schneid.) Tsiang & P.T. Li

D. J. Middleton et al. 1457 [A]

Thailand

Epigynum cochinchinensis (Pierre) D.J. Middleton

D. J. Middleton 209 [A]

Thailand

Gomphocarpus cancellatus (Burm. f.) Bruyns

Drewe 534 [K]

South Africa

Marsdenia glabra Constantin

D. J. Middleton et al. 1123 [A]

Thailand

Oncinotis glabrata Stapf ex Hiern

C. C. H. Jongkind et al. 1315 [US]

Ghana

Oncinotis tenuiloba Stapf

T. Abbott 7707 [Z]

South Africa

Pergularia daemia (Forssk.) Chiov.

Fishbein 5445 [OKLA]

Namibia

Telosma cordata (Burm. f.) Merr.

T. Livshultz 01-33 [BH]

Cultivated. USA. Cornell University

For the Apocynaceae-wide analyses, species from four tribes (Marsdenieae, Baisseeae, Apocyneae, Alyxieae) at increasing phylogenetic distance from Asclepias[58] were selected for primer testing. Pairs of species from three tribes were used: Telosma cordata and Marsdenia glabra (Marsdenieae), Baissea multiflora and Oncinotis tenuiloba (Baisseeae), Epigynum auritum and E. cochinchinense (Apocyneae); Oncinotis glabrata was substituted for O. tenuiloba for six of the primer pairs. In addition, the even more distantly related Alyxia oblongata and, for six of the primer pairs, Al. grandis (Alyxieae) were tested. DNA was extracted using a modified DNeasy method [58]. PCR reactions were performed in 30 μl reaction volume with Apex™ Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Genesee Scientific) diluted to 1× with final concentrations of 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM forward and reverse primers (Table 3). One μl of unquantified DNA extract was added to each reaction. PCR was performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient thermocycler with an initial melting step of 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were examined for amplification success and product sizes estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis for both the Asclepias-specific and family-wide surveys.

Results & Discussion

Genome size estimation

The average 2C value for the five A. syriaca individuals was 1.68 pg (SD 0.07), which corresponds to a haploid nuclear genome size of approximately 820 Mbp. Estimated 2C genome sizes in Apocynaceae range from 0.74 pg in Voacanga grandifolia to 5.00 pg in tetraploid Ceropegia woodii[59], and correspond to haploid nuclear genome sizes of approximately 360 - 2,445 Mbp. Among the ca. 3,000 species of Asclepiadoideae [60], which include C. woodii, other 2C values for diploids are all greater than 4.30 pg [59]. The genome of Asclepias is on the small side for the family based on current knowledge, but a comparison is difficult to make due to the limited sampling of genome size diversity in Apocynaceae.

Illumina sequencing and quality filtering

Of the 10,512,738 reads obtained, a total of 9,651,427 short reads passed the first step of quality filtering yielding 386 Mbp of sequence. The raw reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRP005621). Trimming reads of nucleotides with a "B" quality score and subsequent bases resulted in retention of 99.06% of the quality-filtered data. Reads yielding no data due to all unscorable bases accounted for 0.20% of this read pool. Of the reads obtained, approximately 11.8%, 3.4%, and 1.8% originated from the chloroplast genome, mitochondrial genome, and rDNA repeat arrays respectively. Based on the estimated genome sizes, approximately 0.5× coverage, on average, of the whole A. syriaca genome (including organellar genomes) and 0.4× coverage of the nuclear genome were obtained from one lane of Illumina reads.

Characterization of the organellar genomes of Asclepias syriaca

The Chloroplast Genome

The chloroplast genome of A. syriaca is 158,598 bp [GenBank:JF433943], excluding two small, unresolved regions that were not able to be assembled or Sanger sequenced due to polynucleotide stretches (rps8-rpl14 intergenic spacer and ψycf1), and has an inverted repeat (IR) of 25,401 bp (Figure 1). The initial assembly produced using the alignreads pipeline and the oleander reference contained 51 contigs with a median read depth of 246× and N50 of 4,683 bp. The longest contig was 14,884 bp. The final assembly using the finished A. syriaca sequence as a reference contained 22 contigs, had an N50 of 9,030 bp, and longest contig of 28,186 bp. The use of chloroplast contigs from 80 bp reads from other A. syriaca individuals (S. Straub and A. Liston, unpublished data) in combination with Sanger sequencing of select regions in the 0.5× genome individual and these other individuals, resulted in the addition of 6,622 bp and deletion of 1,402 bp of sequence. That large insertions and deletions were found relative to the original assembly was expected due to the limited power of reference guided assembly algorithms to reconstruct these differences. Only 38 bp of sequence from the original reference guided assembly were determined to be incorrect, producing substitution errors in the genome sequence. The sum total of these changes resulted in the alteration of approximately 5% of the total sequence length, indicating that 95% of the chloroplast genome of A. syriaca was assembled at 0.5× average genome coverage with reads of only 40 bp and an oleander reference with 85% sequence identity (considering only one copy of the inverted repeat). Although the original assembly was very good overall, comparison of the final assembly with the finished reference sequence highlighted the limitations of using 40 bp vs. 80 bp reads for sequence assembly. Even with a correct reference sequence, some regions were still not assembled properly (e.g., accD, ycf1) and some assembly mistakes from the original assembly were recreated (e.g., an erroneous 5 bp deletion in the middle of rbcL causing a frameshift).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-12-211/MediaObjects/12864_2011_Article_3378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map of the chloroplast genome of Asclepias syriaca. The thick black lines indicate the locations of the inverted repeats (IR). The thin black lines indicate the locations of the large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions. Transcription is clockwise for genes on the outside of the circle and counterclockwise for genes on the inside of the circle. Asterisks denote the locations of unresolved sequence due to polynucleotide stretches.

In terms of overall size and IR size, A. syriaca has a typical asterid chloroplast genome [61]. The gene content of the A. syriaca chloroplast genome is similar to those of oleander and coffee (Coffea arabica) [62], with 110 unique genes (76 protein coding, 30 tRNA, 4 rRNA). Seventeen of these are fully duplicated in the IR for a total of 127 putatively functional genes. The most notable difference between the milkweed genome and the oleander and coffee chloroplast genomes is that clpP, accD, and ycf1 are likely pseudogenes in Asclepias. Another difference in the Asclepias genome relative to the other two genomes is shifting of the boundary of the IR in A. syriaca such that the truncated version of rps19 observed in oleander and coffee is not present in IRa of milkweed. Assessment of smaller repeats showed that the A. syriaca chloroplast genome contains few repeats (Table 5). In comparison, the coffee chloroplast genome has nearly three times as many repeats of 30 or more basepairs with 90% or greater sequence identity [62].
Table 5

Repeats in the Asclepias syriaca chloroplast genome

Repeat Location(s)

Repeat Type

Repeat Length (bp)

Identity

trnS-GCU:trnS-GGA

Inverted

32

100%

ψaccD

Direct

63

89%

ψaccD

Direct

202

85%

psbN-psbH spacer

Direct

66

99%

rpl23-trnI-CAU spacer

Direct

57

97%

trnN-GUU-ψycf1 spacer

Direct

299

87%

Repeats of at least 30 bp and at least 85% sequence identity to each copy are reported.

The A. syriaca ψclpP has several features that indicate that it is likely a pseudogene. The nucleotide and protein sequences are divergent from those of oleander (81.3% exon nucleotide and 67.0% protein sequence identity) and coffee (80.8% exon nucleotide and 67.5% protein sequence identity). In comparison, oleander and coffee have 97.2% exon nucleotide and 98.9% protein sequence identity. There is also a 28 bp insertion near the end of exon 3 of A. syriaca (validated by Sanger sequencing) that causes a frame shift and the introduction of a stop codon. Sequence comparisons showed that clpP in oleander and coffee are likely under negative selection (Ka/Ks = 0.07 and 0.03 respectively); however, the Ka/Ks for Asclepias is 1.15 indicating that this locus is likely evolving neutrally. While the clpP introns have been lost multiple times in angiosperms [e.g., [6365, 67, 68]], the coding region has been lost much less often. Other examples of loss of the coding region are only known from Scaevola (Goodeniaceae), Passiflora (Passifloraceae), Trachelium (Campanulaceae), Geranium and Monsonia (Geraniaceae) [6769].

The accD gene of A. syriaca is also likely a pseudogene. This gene is 2,584 bp in A. syriaca compared to 1,497 bp in oleander. There is a repeat-rich (Table 5), approximately 1 kb insertion in the middle of the gene. Although the insertion does not interrupt the reading frame, the remainder of the sequence that is alignable with oleander is highly divergent. This gene can be highly variable, even within a genus [66], but due to the extent of sequence divergence, and lengths of the insertion and repeat motifs, this gene is likely non-functional in Asclepias. However, in pepper, a smaller, repeat-containing insertion of 144 bp in accD does not cause a frameshift nor prevent transcription of the gene [70]. There are numerous other examples of loss of accD from the plastome among angiosperms [e.g., [64, 65, 6769, 71]].

The assembly of ψaccD proved especially challenging for Asclepias due to sequence divergence and the large insertion relative to the oleander reference. De novo assembly of 80 bp reads from another A. syriaca individual and Sanger sequencing confirmed the correct sequence. Further inspection indicated that the assembly errors in this region arose due to the presence of an accD pseudogene in the mitochondrial genome of A. syriaca, also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, which was more similar in sequence and length to the oleander chloroplast accD. A similar problem involving accD and a mitochondrial genome sequence was encountered in the assembly of the pepper plastome [70]. Problems of this sort are likely to arise for assembly of chloroplast genomes, especially with short reads, for regions of the genome that have been duplicated in the mitochondrial or nuclear genomes [72].

A third possible pseudogene in the A. syriaca chloroplast genome is ψycf1. This gene contains one of the two polynucleotide repeats of unresolved length in the genome and has a highly divergent sequence compared to oleander and coffee. The sequence of this gene was also checked and improved using de novo contigs and Sanger sequencing to eliminate the possibility of assembly errors as a cause of sequence divergence. Although ycf1 is one of the most quickly evolving chloroplast genes in seed plants [e.g., [66, 73, 74]], the full length copy of ycf1 in Asclepias is so divergent that it may be non-functional. The sequence identity between ycf1 in oleander and coffee is 87.5%, whereas the sequence identities between each of those species and Asclepias are only 79.4% and 72.2% respectively. In addition to decreased sequence identity, there were 62 and 61 indels inferred from alignments of the Asclepias ycf1 sequence with the oleander and coffee sequences respectively, whereas there were only 16 indels inferred from an alignment of oleander and coffee. Among angiosperms ycf1 has also been lost multiple times [e.g., [65, 6769, 71]].

All three of the putative pseudogenes detected in the A. syriaca plastome, ψclpP, ψaccD, and ψycf1 have functions that are known to be essential for plant development and survival [7577]. Additional studies to evaluate the functionality of these putative pseudogenes will be needed to confirm their designation as such, in combination with further analysis of the nuclear genome to locate functional copies of these indispensible genes or determine which other nuclear genes might encode a functional replacement as in, for example, the case of accD in grasses [e.g., [78, 79]].

The Mitochondrial Genome

A total of 130,764 bp of the A. syriaca mitochondrial genome was assembled in 115 contigs with a median read depth of 32× and N50 of 1,666 bp. See additional file 4: Asclepias syriaca mitochondrial genome contigs (also accessible at http://milkweedgenome.org). The longest contig was 6,948 bp. The extent to which the portion of the genome assembled for A. syriaca represents the whole mitochondrial genome is unknown due to the extensive variation observed for genome size, gene content, and organization among angiosperms [43, 80, 81]. Divergence from the organization of the Nicotiana reference likely prevented a more complete and contiguous assembly. Complete (rrn5) or nearly complete (rrn26, rrn18) ribosomal DNA sequences were identified among the contigs. Twenty-eight putative tRNA sequences representing 25 different tRNAs were also identified. Absence of a complete complement of tRNAs was not unexpected because the number of tRNAs in plant mitochondrial genomes is variable due to the replacement of native mitochondrial tRNAs with versions of chloroplast origin or import of nuclear encoded tRNAs of chloroplast or nuclear origin [80, 81]. For example, among the tRNAs in the A. syriaca mitochondrial genome, both a mitochondrial version and a chloroplast version of trnE- TTC were detected.

The protein coding gene content observed for A. syriaca was compared to that of the mitochondrial genome of Nicotiana tabacum because it is the only other asterid with a sequenced mitochondrial genome. The assembled part of the genome contained the same 37 protein coding genes of known function as the N. tabacum mitochondrial genome with an average coverage of 94.8%. Putative pseudogenes of rps2, rps7, and rps14 were identified in the A. syriaca mitochondrial genome contigs. Both the mitochondrial genome of N. tabacum and A. syriaca appear to lack functional copies of these three genes, in addition to lacking rpl6, rps8, and rps11, the genes lost in all angiosperms, but present in Marchantia[42]. Evidence of ψrps14 is present in tobacco, but there is no remaining evidence of the other two genes. Due to the pseudogenization or absence of these genes in the N. tabacum reference used for the A. syriaca assembly, a more complete characterization of the mitochondrial genome based on additional data will be required to determine if these genes are truly non-functional in A. syriaca or if their absence is an assembly artifact.

Extensive horizontal gene transfer has been hypothesized for the group I intron present in the cox1 gene of angiosperm mitochondrial genomes, with six horizontal transfer events hypothesized in Apocynaceae alone [82]. Alternatively, it has been argued that the distribution of the cox1 intron in plants more likely involved a single horizontal transfer followed by intron loss in many lineages [83]. All but one of the Apocynaceae genera sampled have contained the cox1 intron [82, 83], and it was also found to be present in the assembled cox1 gene of A. syriaca. This result adds to the evidence supporting the intron loss hypothesis over horizontal gene transfer in Apocynaceae.

Characterization of the nuclear genome of Asclepias syriaca

The Velvet de novo assembly using a hash length of 21 resulted in 1,399,320 bp of sequence in 6,997 contigs, 79% of which were 200 bp or less. See additional file 5: Asclepias syriaca nuclear genome de novo assembly contigs (also accessible at http://milkweedgenome.org). The longest contig was 5,027 bp and the N50 for the assembly was 196.

Repetitive Element Characterization

A total of 564 repetitive elements were detected in the A. syriaca de novo contigs (Figure 2). The majority of these repeats were Ty1/copia- like and Ty3/gypsy-like LTR retrotransposons (Figure 2), which are abundant in plants and common across eukaryotes [8486]. Only the most highly represented repeats in the genome would have high enough coverage at 0.4× total nuclear genome coverage to be assembled, so it is not surprising that the majority of the repeats were Ty1/copia- like and Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons. In plant species where retrotransposons have been characterized, it appears to be lineage specific whether Ty1/copia-like or Ty3/gypsy-like retroelements are more abundant in the genome, likely because retrotransposons can proliferate or be lost from genomes over relatively short evolutionary time scales [85, 87]. Among other asterids, Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons are more prevalent in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus), tomato, and potato genomes, while in carrot (Daucus carota), as in A. syriaca, Ty1/copia-like retrotransposons are more numerous [8890].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-12-211/MediaObjects/12864_2011_Article_3378_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Repeat types detected among de novo contigs of the Asclepias syriaca nuclear genome. The numbers indicate individual hits in the contig sequences.

The numbers of retroelements reported here are certain to be different than the actual numbers of retroelements in the sampled A. syriaca genome because the de novo contigs were relatively short compared to the length of retrotransposons, possibly resulting in different regions of the same retroelement being counted multiple times. Additionally, six contigs had more than one good repeat type match, slightly inflating the numbers discovered. Only approximately 2% of the putatively nuclear reads had hits to the repeat-containing contigs. The estimate of raw reads with hits to the plant repeat database did not give a better estimate of the total repeat content of the A. syriaca genome than the hits to assembled repeats with only 0.24% of reads with one or more hits. These results indicate that at 0.4× genome coverage, only an initial characterization of the most common repeats present in a plant genome can be made, while an estimation of the overall repeat content of the genome requires deeper coverage.

Microsatellite repeats were also detected among the 2,624 de novo contigs of at least 150 bp, with a total of 395 microsatellite sequences found in 333 of these contigs (Table 6). Top ten BLAST hits with an E-value of 1e-5 or lower were recovered for 53 and three contigs for mitochondrial and chloroplast sequences respectively. The higher number of possible mitochondrial reads remaining in the read pool following removal of reads putatively belonging to the organellar genomes reflects our more limited knowledge of the mitochondrial genome in plants in general and incomplete assembly of the A. syriaca mitochondrial genome. An alternative explanation for the presence of these small segments of DNA of mitochondrial or chloroplast origin in putatively nuclear contigs is that they correspond to nuclear nomads [72].
Table 6

Microsatellite loci detected in the 0.5× coverage genome of Asclepias syriaca

Repeat Type

Number Found

Number of Loci with Primers

Number Tested/Successful for PCR Amplification

di-

271

206

17/17

tri-

51

30

7/7

tet-

57

43

1/1

pent-

12

9

0/NA

hex-

4

2

0/NA

Total

395

290

25/25

Amplification success of the 25 markers with the highest numbers of repeat units is indicated (see Table 2).

To be conservative in selecting 25 candidates for testing, loci from the 56 contigs with putatively mitochondrial or chloroplast sequence were removed from the pool of candidates, leaving 209 primer sets for putatively nuclear microsatellite loci. See additional file 2: Primer sets designed using BatchPrimer3 for 184 nuclear microsatellite loci in Asclepias syriaca not tested for amplification success. Of the 25 primer sets tested, all successfully amplified in A. syriaca (Table 6). It is important to note that with the low overall genome coverage, at least some of these microsatellite-containing contigs are likely to have originated from multiple, nearly-identical paralogous loci. As is the case with all microsatellites, the ultimate proof in the utility of these markers for identifying intraspecific variation (e.g., linkage mapping or population genetics) will come from obeying a Mendelian locus/allele model that meets expected transmission ratios (in the case of known pedigrees) or Hardy-Weinberg expectations (in the case of wild populations). If the markers show evidence of fixed heterozygosity or dominant-only variation, this would constitute evidence that our microsatellite 'contigs' are the product of microreads representing two or more paralogs. These loci are currently being examined in greater detail to determine their locus specificity.

The source of the rDNA repeats identified by RepeatMasker in the de novo contigs (Figure 2) that remained after the removal of A. syriaca rDNA microreads was also explored. BLAST searches (blastn) of the NCBI nucleotide collection revealed that their source was likely plant fungal pathogens or endophytes. For example, the top BLAST hits for two of theses contigs were to an Alternaria alternata gene for large subunit (LSU) rRNA (1e-105) [GenBank:AB566324.1] and a Davidiella tassiana partial LSU rRNA gene sequence (1e-92) [GenBank:FN868880.1]. Approximately 0.02% of the total reads could be categorized as fungal rDNA when the sequences for the top GenBank hits were used as a BLAT database. Detection of fungal contaminants of a plant genomic DNA preparation is unsurprising due to the ubiquitous association of these two types of organisms.

Ribosomal DNA

A 385 bp contig containing a 120 bp 5S rDNA sequence [GenBank:JF312047] and an rDNA cistron of 7,541 bp [GenBank:JF312046] were assembled for A. syriaca (Figure 3). Repeat structure in the external transcribed spacer (ETS) and intergenic spacer (IGS) regions of the rDNA cistron prevented further extension of that contig and produced an error in the assembly where reads corresponding to similar repeats were incorrectly piled up, highlighting one of the primary difficulties of genome assembly using short reads [32, 91]. Consequently, the first 280 bp of the contig sequence were removed prior to downstream analyses. The median read depth for the final assemblies were 406× for 5S and 738× for the 18S-5.8S-26S cistron. Using the median read depth as an estimate of the number of rDNA copies sequenced and the nuclear genome coverage of approximately 0.4×, rough approximations of the number of 5S rDNA repeats and of rDNA cistron copies are 1,015 and 1,845 respectively. These estimates are in line with values observed for other plants [92, 93].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-12-211/MediaObjects/12864_2011_Article_3378_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

The rDNA cistron of Asclepias syriaca. Blue boxes represent genes. Thick black lines represent additional transcribed sequence. The gray and dashed lines represent non-transcribed and unassembled sequence respectively. Only partial sequences of the non-transcribed spacer (NTS) and external transcribed spacer (ETS) were able to be assembled due to repeats, so the length of the intergenic spacer (IGS) remains unknown.

Fully characterized rDNA cistrons in plants have at least one TATA box upstream of 18S, which demarcates the boundary between the ETS region and the repeat-rich non-transcribed spacer [94, 95]. However, repeat units may also appear between the transcription initiation site (TIS) and 18S [96]. The conserved plant TIS sequence was not observed in the A. syriaca sequence upstream of 18S, so the entire ETS region was not assembled due to internal repeated sequence. However, another ETS motif conserved in plants and always located approximately 420 - 450 bp upstream of the start of 18S [TGAGTGGTGG; [97]] was located 423 bp upstream of 18S in the sequenced portion of ETS. Due to the length variation in the ETS regions in other asterids (Solanum ~1000 bp; Nicotiana >3000 bp in N. tabacum; Olea ~2000 bp), it is difficult to estimate the completeness of our assembly for this region and the cistron as a whole, which is between 9 and 12 kb in Nicotiana[96, 98, 99].

For intragenomic rDNA polymorphism characterization, quality filtering by average quality (q = 20) removed zero reads from the 5S pool, and 148 reads from the 18S-5.8S-26S cistron pool (0.1%). Masking the remaining nucleotides with qualities below 20 affected 1.7% and 6.2% of nucleotides in the two pools, respectively. A high percentage of positions in the 5S locus were polymorphic (Figure 4). Most of these positions had less than 8% of reads differing from the consensus, though some ranged as high as 14%. Conversely, only 19 positions in the 18S-5.8S-26S cistron were polymorphic (Figure 4). Polymorphisms were found in both coding and spacer regions, although none were found in either the 5.8S or ITS2 regions. While spacer regions contained a slightly higher proportion of polymorphic positions than coding regions, positions with the greatest proportion of differing reads were found within coding regions, in particular in the 26S region.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-12-211/MediaObjects/12864_2011_Article_3378_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Polymorphism among rDNA cistron (18S-5.8S-26S) and 5S ribosomal DNA copies in Asclepias syriaca. Non-zero proportions below the blue line are likely due to sequencing error. Proportions above the blue line likely represent polymorphism within or among rDNA arrays. The proportion of polymorphic sites for each rDNA region is given beneath the label.

Levels of intra-genomic polymorphism among copies of the rDNA loci generally agree with previously measured and theoretically expected levels. The high proportion of polymorphic positions in 5S is concordant with previous observations for this locus; however, the levels measured here are somewhat higher than those reported in other plant and animal species [e.g., [100102]]. Intra-genomic polymorphism among copies of the rDNA cistron in this individual is comparable to rates found in previous studies characterizing polymorphism within Drosophila[103] and fungi [104]. While the 19 sites found in this study are within the previously observed range of variation, comparisons are difficult due to the difference in copy number between these taxa (45-180 in the fungi, 200-250 in Drosophila, approximately 1800 in this study), differences in the definition of polymorphic loci, and differences in sequencing technologies (whole-genome shotgun sequencing vs. Illumina).

The distribution of polymorphic positions matches theoretical expectations, with a higher proportion of positions found within spacer rather than coding regions. The very high proportion of differing reads found at two positions in the 26S region may be caused by their location within expansion segments of this region, expansion segments 9 and 8, respectively [105]. The lower levels of polymorphism observed for the 18S-5.8S-26S cistron relative to the 5S rDNA loci are concordant with the molecular evolutionary processes associated with each rDNA type. While strong concerted evolution and strong purifying selection act to homogenize the 18S-5.8S-26S cistron copies within and among repeat arrays, weak concerted evolution and birth-and-death processes for 5S rDNA allow accumulation of polymorphism [100, 106].

Protein Coding Nuclear Genes

From 19,899 Catharanthus ESTs, 9,266 unigenes were created. Of these, 72 corresponded to chloroplast, mitochondrial or rDNA genes and were removed from the data set. Among the remaining repeat masked unigenes, 8,077 had between one and 138 unique microread hits. The median number of hits per kilobase of sequence was 7.17 (95% CI 7.03 - 7.29). The median coverage of the unigenes was 0.29× (95% CI 0.28× - 0.29×; Figure 5a). The 618 genes with coverage levels above 0.984× were outliers. Many of these genes likely correspond to members of multigene families or other duplicated genes, increasing the chances of non-orthologous BLAT hits in conserved domains. For example, a unigene with 6.79× coverage had multiple BLAST hits (E = 0) to eudicot H+-ATPases (P3A-type). Within the P-type ATPase gene super family, the P3A-type subfamily has 10 and 11 members in rice and Arabidopsis respectively [107]. Based on the overall genome coverage and the unigene coverage, the A. syriaca genome likely contains a similar number of P3A-type ATPases.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-12-211/MediaObjects/12864_2011_Article_3378_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Coverage of Catharanthus unigenes and COSII markers by Asclepias syriaca microreads. a. Coverage of Catharanthus nuclear unigenes by A. syriaca microreads for genes with less than 5X coverage. Fifty-six of the 8,077 unigenes with coverage greater than or equal to 5X were excluded from the figure. Among these, the maximum coverage was 17.5X. b. Coverage of COSII single-copy nuclear genes by A. syriaca microreads. The upper box plot whisker represents 1.5 times the interquartile range and the lower whisker extends to the minimum coverage value. Dots represent outliers.

Another explanation for the high coverage of outlier loci was indicated by the masked unigene sequences themselves. Many of the unigenes with the highest coverage still contained sequences that could produce multiple non-homologous hits (e.g., internal polynucleotide stretches), which in turn produced stacks of reads. Read overlap due to this phenomenon inflated the coverage values, so many of the very high coverage values are likely artifacts of the unigene creation and masking process. The presence of PCR duplicate reads in the data set could also have caused read overlap and overestimation of coverage. Most of these reads should have been excluded by counting only unique BLAT hits, but any sequencing errors in the duplicates or length differences due to differing sequence quality, especially at the ends of the reads, could produce nearly identical hits.

Of the 1,086 COSII alignments 721 had between one and 23 unique A. syriaca microread hits with a median gene coverage of 0.14× (95% CI 0.13× - 0.15×; Figure 5b) and median hits per kilobase of sequence of 3.40 (95% CI 3.13 - 3.64). The 35 genes with greater than 0.473× coverage were outliers. There is a possibility that some of these genes are single copy in other asterids, but duplicated in Asclepias, leading to the higher coverage levels. More likely, as in the unigene analysis, sequence features, including microsatellites that were not masked in the COSII alignments, and PCR duplicates led to increased estimates of coverage. Of the five genes with greater than 1× coverage, the only BLAT hits for two were to microsatellites and a third had multiple microsatellite and a single other hit.

The median coverage values for the unigene and COSII data sets would be expected to be close to the estimate of 0.4× coverage for the nuclear genome. However, the observed values deviated from the expected coverage. One explanation for this is that the overall coverage of the A. syriaca genome was slightly overestimated due to the presence of PCR duplicates in the read pool. It is also possible that the genome size of the sequenced individual was larger than the genome sizes estimated from the experimental population, again causing an overestimate of genome coverage. Divergence from the reference sequences would also cause an underestimate of coverage for A. syriaca orthologs. The lower amount of divergence from Catharanthus, a member of the same family, is reflected in the higher estimated coverage for the unigenes than the COSII alignments, which contained sequences of more distantly related asterids. The coverage value for the unigenes may also be higher due to the reasons discussed above. Another feature of both reference data sets that would cause an underestimate of coverage was the absence of introns. The microread sequences from genomic DNA would also represent these features of the genes, but would not produce BLAT hits for these genes. Reads spanning intron-exon boundaries would also have been excluded in many cases due to the mismatch of the intron sequence with the following exon in the unigenes and COSII alignments. Even with these issues confounding coverage estimates, these two explorations of the nuclear gene content of the A. syriaca genome demonstrate that even at 0.4× genome coverage, much of the protein coding portion of the nuclear genome can be detected.

Even with low overall coverage of the 721 COSII genes with A. syriaca microread hits, the alignments were still useful for marker development for Asclepias and Apocynaceae molecular phylogenetics. The 28 genes that had 0.5× or greater coverage were evaluated for their suitability for this purpose. Microreads flanked putative intron locations in 15 genes of this set, allowing primer design for amplification of one or more introns per gene (Table 3).

Primer testing within Asclepias and across Apocynaceae was largely successful with single products amplifying in most tribes of Apocynaceae (Table 7). Amplification of large introns and evidence of length variation among groups are promising for utility of these markers at different scales dependent upon overall sequence divergence. These results highlight how even a small amount of genomic data can facilitate and expedite the arduous process of nuclear marker development across a range of taxonomic scales from within a genus to across a family for groups of species not closely related to a species with extensive genomic resources.
Table 7

Success of PCR amplification and intron length variation for COSII nuclear loci in Asclepias and across Apocynaceae

     

Number of Individuals PCR successful/PCR attempted

Approximate Product Size (bp)#

Arabidopsis Ortholog

tair Annotation

Primer Set

Introns spanned*

Coding Sequence (bp)

As1

M2

B3

Ap4

Al5

As

M

B

Ap

Al

At1g24360

3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier protein) reductase, chloroplast

At1g24360a

360, 441, 487

234

15/20

1/2

1/2

2/2

1/1

1400-1500

1500

1000

300, 1000

1000

  

At1g24360b

582, 615

117

14/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

500-700

500

500

500

700, 1500

  

At1g24360c

750

117

16/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

200

200

200, 1500

200

200, 700

At1g44760

universal stress protein (USP) family protein

At1g44760a

369, 491

334

1/16

1/2

1/2

2/2

1/1

1300

1200

1200

1100

700

At1g55880

pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enzyme

At1g55880a

1043

394

13/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

1200

900

700 - 800

700

300, 700

At1g77370

glutaredoxin, putative

At1g77370a

164, 238

172

16/20

2/2

2/2

0/2

0/1

1400-1500

1100

1100 -1200

n/a

n/a

At2g03120

homologous to Signal Peptide Peptidases (SPP)

At2g03120a

156

210

19/19

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

300-400

300

300

300

300

At2g06530

VPS2.1 (vesicle-mediated transport)

At2g06530a

276

145

20/20

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

400-650

400

700 -

(600, 1000)

600 -

(800,1000)

400, 1200

At2g21960

unknown protein

At2g21960a

503, 592, 722

366

7/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

1500

1500

1700

1600 - 1700

1100

  

At2g21960b

813

84

12/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

200-300

200

150

150

150

At2g30200

[acyl-carrier-protein] S-malonyltransferase

At2g30200a

377, 444

185

12/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

1400

1000

1200

900

1200, >>1500

  

At2g30200b

587, 636, 774

392

13/20

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

700-1500

1200

1200

1200

1200

  

At2g30200c

855

160

16/16

0/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

300

n/a

300

300

300

At2g34620

mitochondrial transcription termination factor-related

At2g34620a

596

254

19/19

2/2

2/2

2/2

2/2

300

300

300

300 - 1000

300

  

At2g34620F/

596

531

15/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

0/2

600

600

600

600

n/a

  

At2g34620aR

            

At2g47390

serine-type endopeptidase

At2g47390a

1718

401

20/20

2/2

2/2

2/2

0/2

500-600

500

500

500

n/a

  

At2g47390b

2177, 2243, 2304, 2454, 2592

506

1/16

0/2

0/2

0/2

0/2

1500

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

At4g13430

methylthioalkylmalate isomerase

At4g13430a

510, 579, 696

275

14/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

700-1000

900, 1200

1200

1200

1200

  

At4g13430b

771, 849, 945, 995, 1050

391

16/20

0/2

2/2

0/2

1/1

1300-1500

n/a

>1500

n/a

1500

  

At4g13430c

1182, 1230

278

15/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

(500, 800)-1000

800

900 - >1500

800

500, 900, 1200

At4g26750

hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein

At4g26750a

305, 381

241

1/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

0/1

1500

>1500

1500

1000

n/a

At5g13420

putative transaldolase

At5g13420a

348, 398

295

12/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

0/1

1300

1100

1000

700

n/a

  

At5g13420b

699, 888

338

20/20

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

800-900

1200

1200

500, 1200

1500

At5g23540

26S proteasome regulatory subunit

At5g23540a

308, 390, 567

436

0/16

2/2

2/2

1/2

0/1

n/a

>>1500

300, 700, >>1500

500, 700

n/a

  

At5g23540aF At5g23540bR

308, 390

231

7/16

2/2

2/2

1/2

1/1

1400

>>1500

700 - 900, >>1500

700

1200

At5g49970

bifunctional pyridoxine (pyridoxamine) 5'-phosphate oxidase (PPOX)

At5g49970a

507

193

20/20

2/2

2/2

2/2

2/2

300

300

300

300

300

  

At5g49970b

613, 780

226

16/16

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/2

500-900

800

800

700

1000

  

At5g49970aFAt5g49970bR

507, 613, 780

398

15/16

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1000-1500

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

*Intron numbers represent the starting position of the intron in Arabidopsis.

1Asclepiadinae Samples include 4 genera: Asclepias (17), Gomphocarpus, Calotropis, and Pergularia.

2Marsdenieae

3Baisseeae

4Apocyneae

5Alyxieae

#Two numbers separated by a comma indicate multiple PCR products. A range of numbers indicates size variation among individuals.

Conclusions

The often-employed strategy of transcriptome sequencing for exploration of the genomes of non-model organisms can produce a wealth of information for comparative and functional genomics studies due to high coverage of the gene space and provide the necessary information for marker development, including single nucleotide polymorphisms [3]. As an alternative, low coverage whole genome sequencing provides a more complete survey of the entire genome by providing substantial information about the organellar genomes and the repeat content of the nuclear genome, while still providing the necessary resources for marker development. In plants with no prior genomic information, acquisition of even a small amount of genomic data allows ready characterization of the high copy fraction of the genome and exploration of the low copy fraction of the genome. A complete, or nearly complete, chloroplast genome and rDNA cistron are readily obtained. A partial to nearly complete mitochondrial genome can be obtained, depending on the complexity of the particular mitochondrial genome. Initial characterizations of the repeat and protein coding portions of the nuclear genome can be made in terms of content and then used in the development of molecular tools, including low-copy nuclear genes and microsatellites, for the further study of the target organism and its relatives.

The data obtained through this study are the first step in the development of a community resource for further study of plant-herbivore and plant-pollinator interactions, floral developmental genetics, chemical evolution, population genetics, and comparative genomics using milkweeds as ecological and evolutionary models. The information obtained from this study is already serving as a resource for development of markers to aid in the study of phylogenetics, population genetics, phylogeography and other areas for Asclepias and Apocynaceae. These results highlight the promise of genomic resources for developing tools in any organism [2, 108] and show that even labs with limited resources can feasibly obtain 0.5× or greater coverage of the genome of their species of interest and a wealth of information. By incorporating 80-120 bp read lengths, paired-end sequences, and ever-improving sequencing technology, this level of coverage and assembly success from a single lane of Illumina sequencing is attainable for all but the very largest of plant genomes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Michael Moore and Douglas Soltis for providing the unpublished Nerium oleander chloroplast genome sequence, Winthrop Phippen for supplying the tissue used for genome size estimation and sequence comparisons, Chris Poklemba for collecting the flow cytometry data, Brian Knaus for access to data processing scripts, Christopher Sullivan for informatics infrastructure management and assistance, Mark Dasenko for Illumina sequencing support, LaRinda Holland, Wyatt Sharber, Angela Rein, and Kevin Kilhoffer for laboratory assistance, and Aakrosh Ratan for YASRA access and support. This research was funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation Systematic Biology Program (DEB 0919583) to RCC, MF, and AL.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University
(2)
Department of Botany, Oklahoma State University
(3)
The Academy of Natural Sciences
(4)
Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service

References

  1. Rokas A, Abbot P: Harnessing genomics for evolutionary insights. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009, 24 (4): 192-200. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hudson ME: Sequencing breakthroughs for genomic ecology and evolutionary biology. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008, 8 (1): 3-17. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02019.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ekblom R, Galindo J: Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity.
  4. Rasmussen DA, Noor MAF: What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae). BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 382-10.1186/1471-2164-10-382.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee RM, Thimmapuram J, Thinglum KA, Gong G, Hernandez AG, Wright CL, Kim RW, Mikel MA, Tranel PJ: Sampling the Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) genome using pyrosequencing technology. Weed Sci. 2009, 57 (5): 463-469. 10.1614/WS-09-021.1.Google Scholar
  6. Swaminathan K, Alabady MS, Varala K, De Paoli E, Ho I, Rokhsar DS, Arumuganathan AK, Ming R, Green PJ, Meyers BC, et al: Genomic and small RNA sequencing of Miscanthus × giganteus shows the utility of sorghum as a reference genome sequence for Andropogoneae grasses. Genome Biol. 2010, 11 (2): R12-10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r12.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hribova E, Neumann P, Matsumoto T, Roux N, Macas J, Dolezel J: Repetitive part of the banana (Musa acuminata) genome investigated by low-depth 454 sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10: 204-10.1186/1471-2229-10-204.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Macas J, Neumann P, Navratilova A: Repetitive DNA in the pea (Pisum sativum L.) genome: comprehensive characterization using 454 sequencing and comparison to soybean and Medicago truncatula. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 427-10.1186/1471-2164-8-427.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Webb KM, Rosenthal BM: Next-generation sequencing of the Trichinella murrelli mitochondrial genome allows comprehensive comparison of its divergence from the principal agent of human trichinellosis, Trichinella spiralis. Infect Genet Evol. 2011, 11 (1): 116-123. 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Willerslev E, Gilbert MT, Binladen J, Ho S, Campos P, Ratan A, Tomsho L, da Fonseca R, Sher A, Kuznetsova T, et al: Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. BMC Evol Biol. 2009, 9 (1): 95.-10.1186/1471-2148-9-95.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dempewolf H, Kane NC, Ostevik KL, Geleta M, Barker MS, Lai Z, Stewart ML, Bekele E, Engels JMM, Cronk QCB, et al: Establishing genomic tools and resources for Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass.--the development of a library of expressed sequence tags, microsatellite loci, and the sequencing of its chloroplast genome. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010, 10 (6): 1048-1058. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02859.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Meyers S, Liston A: Characterizing the genome of wild relatives of Limnanthes alba (Meadowfoam) using massively parallel sequencing. Acta Horticulturae. 2010, 859: 309-314.Google Scholar
  13. Nock CJ, Waters DL, Edwards MA, Bowen SG, Rice N, Cordeiro GM, Henry RJ: Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011, 9: 328-333. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Givnish TJ, Ames M, McNeal JR, McKain MR, Steele PR, dePamphilis CW, Graham SW, Pires JC, Stevenson DW, Zomlefer WB, et al: Assembling the tree of the monocotyledons: plastome sequence phylogeny and evolution of Poales 1. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 2010, 97 (4): 584-616. 10.3417/2010023.Google Scholar
  15. Castoe TA, Poole AW, Gu WJ, de Koning APJ, Daza JM, Smith EN, Pollock DD: Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010, 10 (2): 341-347. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02750.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Abdelkrim J, Robertson BC, Stanton JAL, Gemmell NJ: Fast, cost-effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. Biotechniques. 2009, 46 (3): 185-192. 10.2144/000113084.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE: Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (10): 4623-4628. 10.1073/pnas.0907801107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bai X, Zhang W, Orantes L, Jun T-H, Mittapalli O, Mian MAR, Michel AP: Combining next-generation sequencing strategies for rapid molecular resource development from an invasive aphid species, Aphis glycines. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5 (6): e11370.-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasmann S, Agrawal AA, Cook SC, Erwin AC: Cardenolides, induced responses, and interactions between above- and belowground herbivores of milkweed (Asclepias spp.). Ecology. 2009, 90 (9): 2393-2404. 10.1890/08-1895.1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Broyles SB: Hybrid bridges to gene flow: A case study in milkweeds (Asclepias). Evolution. 2002, 56 (10): 1943-1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wyatt R, Broyles SB: Ecology and evolution of reproduction in milkweeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1994, 25: 423-441. 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002231.Google Scholar
  22. Fishbein M, Venable DL: Evolution of inflorescence design: Theory and data. Evolution. 1996, 50 (6): 2165-2177. 10.2307/2410688.Google Scholar
  23. Agrawal AA, Fishbein M: Phylogenetic escalation and decline of plant defense strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (29): 10057-10060. 10.1073/pnas.0802368105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Agrawal AA, Fishbein M: Plant defense syndromes. Ecology. 2006, 87 (7): S132-S149. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO;2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Malcolm SB: Cardenolide-mediated interactions between plants and herbivores. Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites Volume I: The chemical participants. Edited by: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR. 1991, San Diego: Academic Press, 251-296. 2Google Scholar
  26. Murata J, Bienzle D, Brandle JE, Sensen CW, De Luca V: Expressed sequence tags from Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus). FEBS Lett. 2006, 580 (18): 4501-4507. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Murata J, Roepke J, Gordon H, De Luca V: The leaf epidermome of Catharanthus roseus reveals its biochemical specialization. Plant Cell. 2008, 20 (3): 524-542. 10.1105/tpc.107.056630.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shukla AK, Shasany AK, Gupta MM, Khanuja SPS: Transcriptome analysis in Catharanthus roseus leaves and roots for comparative terpenoid indole alkaloid profiles. J Exp Bot. 2006, 57 (14): 3921-3932. 10.1093/jxb/erl146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Abzhanov A, Extavour CG, Groover A, Hodges SA, Hoekstra HE, Kramer EM, Monteiro A: Are we there yet? Tracking the development of new model systems. Trends in Genet. 2008, 24 (7): 353-360. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.04.002.Google Scholar
  30. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J: Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytom Part A. 2003, 51A (2): 127-128. 10.1002/cyto.a.10013.Google Scholar
  31. Solexa, Inc: Protocol for Whole Genome Sequencing using Solexa Technology. BioTechniques Protocol Guide 2007. 2006, New York: BioTechniques, 291-Google Scholar
  32. Ratan A: Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequence data. PhD thesis. 2009, The Pennsylvania State University, Computer Science and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  33. Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton J, Salzberg SL: Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (11): 2478-2483. 10.1093/nar/30.11.2478.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL: Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004, 5 (2): R12.-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ovcharenko I, Loots GG, Giardine BM, Hou MM, Ma J, Hardison RC, Stubbs L, Miller W: Mulan: Multiple-sequence local alignment and visualization for studying function and evolution. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (1): 184-194. 10.1101/gr.3007205.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T: MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (2): 511-518. 10.1093/nar/gki198.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL: Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20 (17): 3252-3255. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G, Wright F, Marshall D: Tablet--next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26 (3): 401-402. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zerbino D, Birney E: Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 821-829. 10.1101/gr.074492.107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999, 41: 95-98.Google Scholar
  41. Conant GC, Wolfe KH: GenomeVx: simple web-based creation of editable circular chromosome maps. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24 (6): 861-862. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sugiyama Y, Watase Y, Nagase M, Makita N, Yagura S, Hirai A, Sugiura M: The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005, 272 (6): 603-615. 10.1007/s00438-004-1075-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Alverson AJ, Wei XX, Rice DW, Stern DB, Barry K, Palmer JD: Insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genome size from complete sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27 (6): 1436-1448. 10.1093/molbev/msq029.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kent WJ: BLAT - The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (4): 656-664.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Knaus B: Short read toolbox. [http://brianknaus.com]
  46. Gordon A: FASTX-Toolkit. [http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html]
  47. Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (14): 1754-1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nguyen P, Ma J, Pei D, Obert C, Cheng C, Geiger T: Identification of errors introduced during high throughput sequencing of the T cell receptor repertoire. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12 (1): 106.-10.1186/1471-2164-12-106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Gladman S, Seeman T: VelvetOptimiser version 2.1.7. [http://bioinformatics.net.au/software.velvetoptimiser.shtml]
  50. Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SMC, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, Holt C, Alvarado AS, Yandell M: MAKER: An easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (1): 188-196.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smit A, Hubley R, Green P: RepeatMasker Open-3.0. [http://www.repeatmasker.org]
  52. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J: Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 110 (1-4): 462-467. 10.1159/000084979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. You FM, Huo NX, Gu YQ, Luo MC, Ma YQ, Hane D, Lazo GR, Dvorak J, Anderson OD: BatchPrimer3: A high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008, 9: 253-10.1186/1471-2105-9-253.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. He J, Dai XB, Zhao XC: PLAN: a web platform for automating high-throughput BLAST searches and for managing and mining results. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 53-10.1186/1471-2105-8-53.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (17): 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Hood GM: PopTools version 3.2.3. [http://www.poptools.org]
  57. Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley SD: Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics. 2006, 174 (3): 1407-1420. 10.1534/genetics.106.062455.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Livshultz T, Middleton DJ, Endress ME, Williams JK: Phylogeny of Apocynoideae and the APSA clade (Apocynaceae s.l.). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 2007, 94 (2): 324-359. 10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[324:POAATA]2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
  59. Angiosperm DNA C-values Database (Release 6.0, Oct. 2005). [http://www.kew.org/cvalues]
  60. Meve U: Species numbers and progress in Asclepiad taxonomy. Kew Bull. 2002, 57 (2): 459-464. 10.2307/4111126.Google Scholar
  61. Ravi V, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Khurana P: An update on chloroplast genomes. Plant Syst Evol. 2008, 271 (1-2): 101-122. 10.1007/s00606-007-0608-0.Google Scholar
  62. Samson N, Bausher MG, Lee SB, Jansen RK, Daniell H: The complete nucleotide sequence of the coffee (Coffea arabica L.) chloroplast genome: organization and implications for biotechnology and phylogenetic relationships amongst angiosperms. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007, 5 (2): 339-353. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00245.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Jansen RK, Wojciechowski MF, Sanniyasi E, Lee SB, Daniell H: Complete plastid genome sequence of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and the phylogenetic distribution of rps 12 and clp P intron losses among legumes (Leguminosae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 48 (3): 1204-1217. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.013.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lee HL, Jansen RK, Chumley TW, Kim KJ: Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (5): 1161-1180. 10.1093/molbev/msm036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Guisinger MM, Chumley TW, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK: Implications of the plastid genome sequence of Typha (Typhaceae, Poales) for understanding genome evolution in Poaceae. J Mol Evol. 2010, 70 (2): 149-166. 10.1007/s00239-009-9317-3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Greiner S, Wang X, Rauwolf U, Silber MV, Mayer K, Meurer J, Haberer G, Herrmann RG: The complete nucleotide sequences of the five genetically distinct plastid genomes of Oenothera, subsection Oenothera: I. Sequence evaluation and plastome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (7): 2366-2378. 10.1093/nar/gkn081.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK: Extreme reconfiguration of plastid genomes in the angiosperm family Geraniaceae: Rearrangements, repeats, and codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (1): 583-600. 10.1093/molbev/msq229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, dePamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J, Müller KF, Guisinger-Bellian M, Haberle RC, Hansen AK, et al: Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (49): 19369-19374. 10.1073/pnas.0709121104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Haberle RC, Fourcade HM, Boore JL, Jansen RK: Extensive rearrangements in the chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum are associated with repeats and tRNA genes. J Mol Evol. 2008, 66 (4): 350-361. 10.1007/s00239-008-9086-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Jo Y, Park J, Kim J, Song W, Hur C-G, Lee Y-H, Kang B-C: Complete sequencing and comparative analyses of the pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plastome revealed high frequency of tandem repeats and large insertion/deletions on pepper plastome. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 1-13.Google Scholar
  71. Cai ZQ, Guisinger M, Kim HG, Ruck E, Blazier JC, McMurtry V, Kuehl JV, Boore J, Jansen RK: Extensive reorganization of the plastid genome of Trifolium subterraneum (Fabaceae) is associated with numerous repeated sequences and novel DNA insertions. J Mol Evol. 2008, 67 (6): 696-704. 10.1007/s00239-008-9180-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Arthofer W, Schuler S, Steiner FM, Schlick-Steiner BC: Chloroplast DNA-based studies in molecular ecology may be compromised by nuclear-encoded plastid sequence. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19 (18): 3853-3856. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04787.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A: Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. BMC Biology. 2009, 7: 84-10.1186/1741-7007-7-84.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Neubig K, Whitten W, Carlsward B, Blanco M, Endara L, Williams N, Moore M: Phylogenetic utility of ycf1 in orchids: a plastid gene more variable than matK. Plant Syst Evol. 2009, 277 (1): 75-84. 10.1007/s00606-008-0105-0.Google Scholar
  75. Kuroda H, Maliga P: The plastid clpP1 protease gene is essential for plant development. Nature. 2003, 425 (6953): 86-89. 10.1038/nature01909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Drescher A, Ruf S, Calsa T, Carrer H, Bock R: The two largest chloroplast genome-encoded open reading frames of higher plants are essential genes. Plant J. 2000, 22 (2): 97-104. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00722.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kode V, Mudd EA, Iamtham S, Day A: The tobacco plastid accD gene is essential and is required for leaf development. Plant J. 2005, 44 (2): 237-244. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02533.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Konishi T, Shinohara K, Yamada K, Sasaki Y: Acetyl-CoA carboxylase in higher plants: Most plants other than Gramineae have both the prokaryotic and the eukaryotic forms of this enzyme. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996, 37 (2): 117-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Gornicki P, Faris J, King I, Podkowinski J, Gill B, Haselkorn R: Plastid-localized acetyl-CoA carboxylase of bread wheat is encoded by a single gene on each of the three ancestral chromosome sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (25): 14179-14184. 10.1073/pnas.94.25.14179.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Kubo T, Mikami T: Organization and variation of angiosperm mitochondrial genome. Physiol Plant. 2007, 129 (1): 6-13. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00768.x.Google Scholar
  81. Knoop V: The mitochondrial DNA of land plants: peculiarities in phylogenetic perspective. Curr Genet. 2004, 46 (3): 123-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sanchez-Puerta MV, Cho Y, Mower JP, Alverson AJ, Palmer JD: Frequent, phylogenetically local horizontal transfer of the cox1 group I intron in flowering plant mitochondria. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25 (8): 1762-1777. 10.1093/molbev/msn129.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Cusimano N, Zhang L-B, Renner SS: Reevaluation of the cox1 group I intron in Araceae and angiosperms indicates a history dominated by loss rather than horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25 (2): 265-276. 10.1093/molbev/msm241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Bennetzen JL: The contributions of retroelements to plant genome organization, function and evolution. Trends Microbiol. 1996, 4 (9): 347-353. 10.1016/0966-842X(96)10042-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Kumar A, Bennetzen JL: Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet. 1999, 33: 479-532. 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Vitte C, Bennetzen JL: Analysis of retrotransposon structural diversity uncovers properties and propensities in angiosperm genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006, 103 (47): 17638-17643. 10.1073/pnas.0605618103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Vitte C, Panaud O: LTR retrotransposons and flowering plant genome size: emergence of the increase/decrease model. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 110 (1-4): 91-107. 10.1159/000084941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Cavagnaro P, Chung S-M, Szklarczyk M, Grzebelus D, Senalik D, Atkins A, Simon P: Characterization of a deep-coverage carrot (Daucus carota L.) BAC library and initial analysis of BAC-end sequences. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009, 281 (3): 273-288. 10.1007/s00438-008-0411-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Cavallini A, Natali L, Zuccolo A, Giordani T, Jurman I, Ferrillo V, Vitacolonna N, Sarri V, Cattonaro F, Ceccarelli M, et al: Analysis of transposons and repeat composition of the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2010, 120 (3): 491-508. 10.1007/s00122-009-1170-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Datema E, Mueller L, Buels R, Giovannoni J, Visser R, Stiekema W, van Ham R: Comparative BAC end sequence analysis of tomato and potato reveals overrepresentation of specific gene families in potato. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8 (1): 34.-10.1186/1471-2229-8-34.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Whiteford N, Haslam N, Weber G, Prugel-Bennett A, Essex J, Roach P, Bradley M, Neylon C: An analysis of the feasibility of short read sequencing. Nucl Acids Res. 2005, 33 (19): e171.-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Rogers SO, Bendich AJ: Ribosomal-RNA genes in plants - Variability in copy number and in the intergenic spacer. Plant Mol Biol. 1987, 9 (5): 509-520. 10.1007/BF00015882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Sastri DC, Hilu K, Appels R, Lagudah ES, Playford J, Baum BR: An overview of evolution in plant 5S DNA. Plant Syst Evol. 1992, 183 (3): 169-181. 10.1007/BF00940801.Google Scholar
  94. Hillis DM, Dixon MT: Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol. 1991, 66 (4): 411-453. 10.1086/417338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Volkov R, Kostishin S, Ehrendorfer E, Schweizer D: Molecular organization and evolution of the external transcribed rDNA spacer region in two diploid relatives of Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 1996, 201 (1-4): 117-129. 10.1007/BF00989055.Google Scholar
  96. Borisjuk NV, Davidjuk YM, Kostishin SS, Miroshnichenco GP, Velasco R, Hemleben V, Volkov RA: Structural analysis of rDNA in the genus Nicotiana. Plant Mol Biol. 1997, 35 (5): 655-660. 10.1023/A:1005856618898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Bena G, Jubier M-F, Olivieri I, Lejeune B: Ribosomal external and internal transcribed spacers: Combined use in the phylogenetic analysis of Medicago (Leguminosae). J Mol Evol. 1998, 46 (3): 299-306. 10.1007/PL00006306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Volkov RA, Komarova NY, Panchuk II, Hemleben V: Molecular evolution of rDNA external transcribed spacer and phylogeny of sect. Petota (genus Solanum). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003, 29 (2): 187-202. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00092-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Maggini F, Gelati MT, Spolverini M, Frediani M: The intergenic spacer region of the rDNA in Olea europaea L. Tree Genet Genom. 2008, 4 (2): 293-298. 10.1007/s11295-007-0109-x.Google Scholar
  100. Cronn RC, Zhao XP, Paterson AH, Wendel JF: Polymorphism and concerted evolution in a tandemly repeated gene family: 5S ribosomal DNA in diploid and allopolyploid cottons. J Mol Evol. 1996, 42 (6): 685-705. 10.1007/BF02338802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Fujiwara M, Inafuku J, Takeda A, Watanabe A, Fujiwara A, Kohno S, Kubota S: Molecular organization of 5S rDNA in bitterlings (Cyprinidae). Genetica. 2009, 135 (3): 355-365. 10.1007/s10709-008-9294-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Saini A, Jawali N: Molecular evolution of 5S rDNA region in Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis and its phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst Evol. 2009, 280 (3-4): 187-206. 10.1007/s00606-009-0178-4.Google Scholar
  103. Stage DE, Eickbush TH: Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (12): 000.-Google Scholar
  104. Ganley ARD, Kobayashi T: Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: Total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (2): 184-191. 10.1101/gr.5457707.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Kolosha VO, Fodor I: Nucleotide sequence of Citrus limon 26S ribosomal-RNA gene and secondary structure model of its RNA. Plant Mol Biol. 1990, 14 (2): 147-161. 10.1007/BF00018556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Nei M, Rooney AP: Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families*. Annu Rev Genet. 2005, 39 (1): 121-152. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Baxter I, Tchieu J, Sussman MR, Boutry M, Palmgren MG, Gribskov M, Harper JF, Axelsen KB: Genomic comparison of P-Type ATPase ion pumps in Arabidopsis and Rice. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132 (2): 618-628. 10.1104/pp.103.021923.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Thomson RC, Wang IJ, Johnson JR: Genome-enabled development of DNA markers for ecology, evolution and conservation. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19 (11): 2184-2195. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04650.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Straub et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.