Regulation and expression of sexual differentiation factors in embryonic and extragonadal tissues of Atlantic salmon
© von Schalburg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 July 2010
Accepted: 13 January 2011
Published: 13 January 2011
The products of cyp19, dax, foxl2, mis, sf1 and sox9 have each been associated with sex-determining processes among vertebrates. We provide evidence for expression of these regulators very early in salmonid development and in tissues outside of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal/gonadal (HPAG) axis. Although the function of these factors in sexual differentiation have been defined, their roles in early development before sexual fate decisions and in tissues beyond the brain or gonad are essentially unknown.
Bacterial artificial chromosomes containing salmon dax1 and dax2, foxl2b and mis were isolated and the regulatory regions that control their expression were characterized. Transposon integrations are implicated in the shaping of the dax and foxl2 loci. Splice variants for cyp19b1 and mis in both embryonic and adult tissues were detected and characterized. We found that cyp19b1 transcripts are generated that contain 5'-untranslated regions of different lengths due to cryptic splicing of the 3'-end of intron 1. We also demonstrate that salmon mis transcripts can encode prodomain products that present different C-termini and terminate before translation of the MIS hormone. Regulatory differences in the expression of two distinct aromatases cyp19a and cyp19b1 are exerted, despite transcription of their transactivators (ie; dax1, foxl2, sf1) occurring much earlier during embryonic development.
We report the embryonic and extragonadal expression of dax, foxl2, mis and other differentiation factors that indicate that they have functions that are more general and not restricted to steroidogenesis and gonadogenesis. Spliced cyp19b1 and mis transcripts are generated that may provide regulatory controls for tissue- or development-specific activities. Selection of cyp19b1 transcripts may be regulated by DAX-1, FOXL2 and SF-1 complexes that bind motifs in intron 1, or by signals within exon 2 that recruit splicing factors, or both. The potential translation of proteins bearing only the N-terminal MIS prodomain may modulate the functions of other TGF β family members in different tissues. The expression patterns of dax1 early in salmon embryogenesis implicate its role as a lineage determination factor. Other roles for these factors during embryogenesis and outside the HPAG axis are discussed.
Sex determination and early gonadal development depends upon specific embryonic gene programs that activate differentiation of the bipotential primodium. These processes hinge upon the expression of both sex-linked and autosomal genes that promote or antagonize male or female cell fate pathways. The products of some genes are essential for female (WNT-4 (Wingless-related MMTV integration site-4) and follistatin)  and male (SRY (Sex-determining region of the Y chromosome) and FGF-9 (fibroblast growth factor-9))  sex-determination in mammals. In mammals, as well as teleosts, DAX-1 (Dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenital, critical region on the X-chromosome, gene-1), FOXL2 (forkhead box L2), cytochrome P450 aromatase, MIS (Mullerian inhibiting substance), SF-1 (steroidogenic factor-1), SOX-9 (SRY-related, high-mobility group (HMG) box (SRY box)-9), WT-1 (Wilm's tumour-1) [3–6] and many other gene products contribute in directing sex-determined fates, as well as to subsequent gonad development and function [7-9 and refs. therein].
SF-1 is central to the activity of many of these genes as well as a large component of steroidogenic genes. Both SF-1 and DAX-1 are orphan receptors for which no ligand has yet been unequivocally identified, but which do possess ligand-binding domains . SF-1 and DAX-1 interact cooperatively or antagonistically to influence various target gene activities . DAX-1 modulates transcription of genes such as aromatase  and MIS  through direct interactions with SF-1 and the recruitment of other factors. Functional interactions of SF-1 with WT-1 or DAX-1 promotes or inhibits the expression of MIS . The products of dax1, foxl2 and sf1 each play critical roles in the transcriptional regulation of aromatase (cyp19) genes [6, 11, 14–17].
Elucidation of the factors that promote or repress the transcription of these differentiation factors will also help to characterize the regulatory programs they initiate. Conservation of transcription factor binding motifs in the promoters of mammalian and teleost genes point to shared regulatory regimes. The expression patterns of the genes described here may be deciphered in part by examination of their promoter regions. Antagonism between DAX-1 and FOXL2 or SF-1 and SOX factors may be common themes for activation or repression among many of these differentiation factors [11, 18–23].
Although our understanding of the action of various sex determination and differentiation factors in early gonad development is well-established, our knowledge of other roles that these regulators may play before formation of sexual tissues is limited. Sex-specific regulation of various steroidogenic and differentiation regulators in trout have been demonstrated by molecular studies to occur about one month before observable morphological differences . Histologically discernable features of gonad differentiation in salmonids become manifest approximately five weeks after hatching [5, 14].
In the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), we have detected the expression of dax1/2, foxl2a/b and mis (and sf1 and sox9 factors) more than three weeks before even the hatching stage. In this paper we show that the genes we examined were expressed several months before morphologically discernable differentiation of the gonad. This is the first time, other than for dax1, that this has been demonstrated for the genes we selected. We also demonstrate broad expression of these regulators in various extragonadal adult tissues. Therefore genes previously considered to be involved in gonadogenesis and steroidogenesis are apparently more general in their transcriptional programming, at least in salmon.
Furthermore, we have isolated, sequenced and assembled BACs containing these genes and analyzed their proximal promoters. Our expression studies also reveal unique splicing activities that occur among some of these regulators. Taken together, we suggest that the roles of dax1/2, foxl2a/b, mis and sf1 are not confined to differentiation and development of gonadal (and brain) cell lineages and examine the potential influence of the novel splicing and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of these factors within and outside the HPAG axis.
Stages that present challenges during development
Early expression of sex differentiation factors
Expression of sex differentiation factors in various adult tissues
Most of the information available on the genes we examined is from investigations done on the brain or gonadal tissue (eg; endocrine organs). We therefore explored the expression of each gene in twelve tissues extracted and prepared from three different male and female adult fish. Analysis of the RT-PCR results indicates that most of these genes were expressed quite broadly (see Additional file 2). We were most surprised to find the expression of sf1, mis and both sox9 genes across all tissues examined, particularly in the male. It was also interesting to compare the expression patterns between paralogs where it was possible to distinguish potential regulatory differences between foxl2a and foxl2b, and cyp19a and cyp19b1 transcripts (see Additional file 2). We also detected the expression of multiple products for cyp19b1 and mis and these amplicons were isolated, cloned and sequenced.
Alternative splicing of mis transcripts
The features of the different mis transcripts may be important for different regulatory capacities, depending on the tissue in which they are expressed. For example, mis (629 bp) is expressed at relatively high levels in the muscle, skin, gill, spleen, brain and heart; mis (436 bp) is most "strongly" expressed in the gonad (as well as the kidney and eye), and mis (396 bp) is expressed at a relatively low level in most of the male tissues we examined (see Additional file 2). Other potential alternatively-spliced amplicons of mis are observed in several of the female tissues.
In the early development stages, expression of mis was first observed on D18 and we did detect the expression of multiple mis amplicons by D27 (data not shown). We attempted to clone and sequence each of these PCR products, but were successful in obtaining information for only the larger 629 bp transcript.
Alternative splicing of cyp19b1 transcripts
During the process of preparing clones for sequencing to confirm their identities, we isolated and sequenced cyp19b1 transcripts of three different sizes from D38 larvae. Previous work demonstrated that at least five different cyp19b1 transcripts that bear differences in the lengths of their 5'-UTRs are generated in the brain and gonads of rainbow trout [23, 28]. We now show similar results for the transcription of cyp19b1 transcripts with 5'-UTRs of a variety of lengths in Atlantic salmon.
Generally, strong 3'-splice sites in vertebrate intronic regions contain a pyrimidine-rich tract and a terminal AG [29, 30]. These sequences are important for spliceosome recognition for precise intron removal . Examining the 30 nts preceeding each of the three 3'-splice sites in intron 1 of cyp19b1 revealed that the conventional intron 1/exon 2 junction, the cryptic 3'-splice site and the most upstream splice site had 33% (1), 53% (2) and 63% (3) CT content, respectively (Figure 5). Interestingly, the splice site with the least pyrimidine content is that of the more conventional intron 1/exon 2 junction. It is therefore possible that the formation of this junction is the least favoured of the three splice sites presented here.
A comparison of the rainbow trout [GenBank:AJ716203] and Atlantic salmon cyp19b1 intron 1 shows strong conservation in the 5'-and 3'-ends (data not shown). The central region of the two introns contain indels and are less conserved. Interestingly, only one intronic repeat sequence (IRS) segment, previously reported as four contiguous blocks of 46 nts in the trout , was present in the salmon cyp19b1 intron 1 (Figure 6). The loss of the other three IRSs in the Atlantic salmon comprises almost half of the difference in the sizes between the introns (trout: 1264 bp; salmon: 964 bp).
The novelty of the cryptic 3'-splicing in the cyp19b1 intron 1 [23, 28 and refs therein] suggests this region is a target for regulators that bind signal elements within it to dictate distinct splicing events. Interestingly, a cluster of perfect and imperfect core recognition motifs for FOXL2 (5'-(G/A)(T/C)(C/A)AA(C/T)A-3' [16, 25, 26]) are located in the salmon cyp19b1 intron 1 (Figure 6). The IRS contains at least one potential half-site (AGGACCT) that could potentially bind estrogen receptor or retinoic acid receptor-retinoid X receptor heteromers. The IRS is also flanked by two everted SF-1 motifs that present only one mismatch to the consensus sequence YCAAGGYCR, where Y = T/C and R = G/A [31 and refs therein].
Recent viral and mammalian work has demonstrated that exonic splicing signals exist that can enhance (ESEs) or suppress (ESSs) spliceosome recognition for intron splice sites . Although this class of RNA processing signal is ill-defined in fish, we previously identified several putative exonic splicing enhancers and suppressors in exon 2 of trout cyp19b1. These ESEs and ESSs are almost identical in the Atlantic salmon cyp19b1 exon 2 (data not shown), indicating that this exon contains significantly positioned splicing motifs that could also potentially direct the lengths of the 5'-end of cyp19b1 mRNAs.
Conservation of nucleocytoplasmic transport signals in SOX9
BAC organization and regulatory regions
The mammalian dax1 promoter contains binding sites for OCT3/4, SOX-2, SF-1 and other regulatory factors . We show both of the salmonid dax promoters contain binding elements for SF-1 and SOX-2 factors, but that only the dax1 proximal promoter contains OCT3/4 motifs (see Additional files 4 and 5). The possibility exists that these promoters could also be regulated by estrogen receptor since both have potential palindromic EREs. Other clear differences are discernable in the regulation of these two genes, most notably in the large regions of CT- and GA-rich regions in dax2 that are not present in dax1 (see Additional files 4 and 5). The GA-rich region is contiguous with a block of DNA that contains at least four perfect repeats, each 40 nts in length.
We could not identify any canonical SOX binding elements in the proximal mis promoter. However, we did detect two potential half-AREs and the presence of two SOX footprints  (see Additional file 6). Several OCT3/4, PPARE and WT-1 response elements were also identified. As well, typical GC boxes are located in the mis promoter (5'-GGGGCGGGGC-3') that could bind SP-1 and Kruppel-like factors .
We found a tetrapartite GCAT sequence in the foxl2b promoter that might bind SMAD factors. SMADs can act through GCNT, GCCG and GCAT sequence motifs . Interestingly, the foxl2b promoter does not contain a strong consensus SF-1 binding motif. However, it is possible that a weaker site at -802 to -795 (5'-TCAGGCCA-3') could interact with SF-1 (see Additional file 7). We also provide evidence that FOXL2 may regulate its own expression through several binding sites present in its promoter. Numerous potential binding sites for ERE, RXR/RAR and WT-1 are also located in the foxl2 promoter.
Transposon integration analysis
Postnatal expression of MIS in the early mammalian male gonad leads to male reproductive tract development mediated through regression of the female anlagen . The importance of MIS to male sexual differentiation is demonstrated by the morphological and endocrine sex reversal of fetal ovaries exposed to MIS . The expression of MIS has been associated with the downregulation of cyp19a in mammals , zebrafish  and sea bass .
We have observed expression of mis in immature and mature ovary and testis of both trout and salmon (data not shown). The activity of mis was absent only in precocious or prespawn trout testis. In this study, we show expression of mis during early development and in various adult salmon tissues (Figure 2 and 3; see Additional file 2). The expression of mis by D18 indicates the potential for a role early in salmonid development. Since MIS is a glycoprotein member of the TGF β family, it may serve in establishing and shaping different cellular phenotypes well before patterning of the reproductive tissues.
Since we observe expression of mis and the absence of cyp19a in most adult tissues (see Additional file 2), it could be suggested that MIS downregulates cyp19a. In contrast, the expression of cyp19b1 is evident in most adult tissues. Transactivation of cyp19b1 may not be reliant on gonadotropic inputs like cyp19a (ie; cAMP stimulation [17, 23, 40]), and therefore could be refractory to inhibition by MIS. Nevertheless, unlike in mammalian models where mis expression is absent during the onset of sex determination, mis expression is detected in the embryonic gonads of both trout [5, 14] and tilapia . Although the levels of expression in the female are much lower than in the male during the crucial sex determination window [5, 6, 14], it may still play a role in female development. For example, disruptions to MIS signaling have been shown to impact germ cell proliferation and cell-cycle timing in both sexes of medaka .
Furthermore, in mammalian models, mis is the downstream regulatory target of SOX-9 activity in the differentiating testis. However, expression of sox9a and sox9b occurs in both the trout male and female gonad during sex determination . Part of the decoupling of MIS expression from SOX regulation, at least in salmonids, could be due to the lack of canonical SOX binding elements in the proximal mis promoter (see Additional file 6). Another control mechanism that may differ in fish that exists in mammals is that nuclear localization of SOX-9 occurs in the male (to promote subsequent MIS transcription), but is absent in the primordial female gonad . The subcellular localization signals that have been shown to direct SOX-9 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling during mammalian male sexual differentiation [32, 33] are highly conserved in salmonid SOX-9 proteins. Whether these signals are targets for sex-specific transport factors; and whether the sox9 paralogs are localized to different cell-types, and are involved in differentiation of Sertoli precursor cells in salmonids, still remains to be determined.
In mammals, the MIS precursor protein consists of two sections - the N-terminal prodomain and the C-terminal, mature hormone region . The mammalian studies indicate that the MIS precursor protein is proteolytically cleaved at consensus RXXR sites . It is not known if fish MIS proprotein is similarly proteolytically activated, but the organization and conservation of these motifs across many species does suggest similar mechanisms of hormone bioactivation . Although the mammalian studies indicate that the N-terminal prodomain section of MIS serves only to stabilize and to target the processed hormone , our work suggests that some mis transcripts generate only truncated prodomain representatives. The function of these transcripts, in various tissues and during early development, remains to be determined. It is possible that the expression of transcripts that encode the MIS prodomain alone may add another level of control for tissue-specific regulation of MIS activity, or that they influence the bioactivities of other members of the TGF family, such as BMPs, activin or inhibin. Heterodimerization between various members of this large family of growth factors has been shown to direct different cell-patterning decisions [45 and refs therein, 46].
DAX-1 has been described to be either a possible ovarian- or testicular-determining factor [12, 14, 44, 47]. We previously found dax1 to be consistently expressed across all reproductive development stages examined in trout ovary and testis . Although both the salmon dax1 and dax2 described here were expressed in all adult tissues (see Additional file 2), the appearance of dax1 was at least two weeks before dax2 in salmon embryos (Figure 2).
Although the interactions that promote the undifferentiated state in embryonic stem (ES) cells are well-established, the events that antagonize them to initiate cellular differentiation are poorly understood. The expression of dax1 has been associated with early mammalian ES cells in maintaining the undifferentiated state and to safeguard pluripotency [20, 48]. OCT3/4 and SOX-2 are also considered "core" transcription factors in the maintenance of pluripotency . It has been shown that these factors interact cooperatively to regulate dax1 expression in ES cells . We found putative response elements for OCT3/4 and SOX factors in the dax1 and dax2 promoters (see Additional files 4 and 5), that implicate their role in the regulation of the salmonid genes as well.
It also has been proposed that SF-1 expression is not coupled to dax1 regulation in ES cells . In this regard, it is also important to note the location of the SOX consensus binding elements in close proximity to the SF-1 motifs in both salmonid dax promoters (see Additional files 4 and 5). SOX binding of its response element may interfere with SF-1 binding during early development stages. We also show the expression of sf1 no earlier than D14, a period that succeeds a potentially important differentiation transition point (see below) (Figure 2).
Regulation of alternative splicing by DAX-1 and SOX factors may control stem cell differentiation, and initiation and development of the gonad . It has been demonstrated that dax1 inhibits pre-mRNA splicing of target genes and that these activities can be restored by the addition of HMG-domain containing factors . Moreover, it has been proposed that the control of splicing is exerted through competiton between DAX-1 and SOX proteins for splicing factor complexes . Antagonism between DAX-1 (and OCT3/4 ) and SOX-2 (and other HMG-domain proteins?)  may be the mechanism whereby "stemness" versus differentiation-associated genes are regulated in ES cells. The decline (D10), absence (D12) and reappearance (D14) of dax1 we detected (Figure 2) may reflect a transition that results in differentiation of embryonic cell layers in specific developing organs; similar to the different cell lineages that have been shown to arise following dax1 downregulation in mouse [21, 24].
Both foxl2 transcripts were found to be expressed very early in development (Figure 2). In the male, we found foxl2a expression to be quite restricted in comparison to the foxl2b diverged paralog, which was present in most adult extragonadal tissues examined (see Additional file 2). In contrast, expression of foxl2b is quite restricted in the adult female tissues, essentially confined to the skin, gill and ovary. The expression of foxl2b in the testis was also very strong, correlating well with previous findings that showed foxl2b was present, with foxl2a absent, in later stages of testis development in trout . Taken together, this may indicate that foxl2b is an important regulator of male-specific genes (eg; cyp19b1), at least later in development.
The expression of foxl2a is associated with upregulation of ovarian-specific cyp19a and with differentiation of the ovary in many species [6, 14, 16, 17, 25, 26]. Upregulation of foxl2 genes have been correlated with cyp19a expression during ovarian differentiation in trout , Japanese flounder  and Nile tilapia [6, 16]. Depending on the study, transactivation of cyp19a occurs directly through the FOXL2 binding elements or in concert with SF-1. SF-1-mediated regulation of aromatase activity is modulated by DAX-1, which binds SF-1 directly [11, 15].
We previously implicated FOXL2 with the generation of cyp19b1 transcripts bearing 5'-ends of different lengths, potentially in complexes with SF-1 and DAX-1 . At least two SF-1 binding sites and a number of potential FOXL2 response elements reside in the trout cyp19b1 intron 1. Because of well-characterized DAX-1 spliceosome activity (see above), and the association of both DAX-1 and SF-1 with FOXL2 at aromatase promoters in fish and mammals [6, 11, 15–17, 25, 26], we hypothesize that complexes of these gene products could also control splicing activity of cyp19b1.
This mechanism of regulatory control in the synthesis of these transcripts is further reinforced by our present characterization of the Atlantic salmon cyp19b1 intron 1 (Figure 6) which maintains many of the features described for the trout cyp19b1 intron 1 . In accord with this model, we demonstrate the generation of differentially spliced, partial intron 1-containing cyp19b1 transcripts in salmon. We argue that if DAX-1, FOXL2 and SF-1 are known to interact at aromatase promoters, then nucleation at the cyp19b1 intron 1 is also plausible. Strong evidence exists that indicates that various transcription factors and nuclear hormone receptors can bind to RNA and regulate RNA splicing, migration and localization [50, 51]. For example, both DAX-1 and SF-1 have been shown to bind steroid receptor activator , a RNA that acts as a bridge and platform to nucleate and stabilize transcription complexes. It has been proposed that nuclear receptors, such as SF-1, which can bind DNA as monomers, may recognize the YCAAGGYCR motif in RNA [52 and refs therein]. Among the various factors that bind RNA, recognition for YCAAGGYCR, as well as for other binding elements, may be through different mechanisms of interaction with the nucleic acid (e.g. zinc fingers, anti-parallel α-helices) [31, 50, 52].
In this study, we confirmed the expression of alternatively-spliced cyp19b1 transcripts in only the larvae (D38) and gonad of salmon. However, expression of cyp19b1 transcripts of different sizes and abundances are evident in a broad range of adult tissues (see Additional file 2), such as muscle (521 bp), skin (452 bp) and spleen (367 bp) of the male. Whether differences in processing results in partitioning of specific cyp19b1 transcripts to distinct tissues remains to be explored.
We also show during early salmon development that at least a three-week delay in the transcription of cyp19a occurs in comparison to cyp19b1 (Figure 2 and 3). Part of these regulatory differences could be dictated by estrogenic or gonadotropic controls [23 and refs therein]. For example, unlike cyp19b promoters, cyp19a promoters lack consensus EREs for the fish species characterized to date [17, 18, 25, 53–55]. Another important difference between these genes is that SOX binding elements, often many of them, are in close proximity to SF-1 binding motifs in teleost cyp19a promoters [18, 25, 53, 54]. Competition between SOX factors and FOXL2 for access to their binding sites on cyp19a promoters could be key to ovarian-specific aromatase synthesis. This is compatible with recent work that shows that the mammalian ovarian phenotype is mediated by cooperative FOXL2 and ER repression of sox9 transcription ; interactions that are opposed by the binding of SRY/SF-1 and SOX-9 in the male pathway . Further work is needed to define the precise roles that FOXL2A and FOXL2B play in activation of the two salmonid cyp19 genes early in development, as well as their function in the transcription of other promoters.
There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates that past transposon activity has led to salmonid genome remodeling [38, 56]. We show the integration of SsaRT.4 very close to the transcription start site of the pseudogenic foxl2a (Figure 10). Although speculative, integration of SsaRT.4 into the foxl2a regulatory region may have led to the reorganization of the 5'-end and subsequent accumulation of stop codons into the coding region of this gene. Integration of SsaRT.4 into the dax2 intron also provides an example of how transposon activity can rearrange genes; potentially leading to the creation of introns and indicating how genes can acquire new functions over time.
We have found expression of many factors classically associated with sex differentiation in embryonic stages well before sex fate determination. Their expression early in development points to the potential for function during embryogenesis. Expression of these regulators in diverse adult tissues also indicates their potential role in transcription programs independent of steroidogenesis and gonadogenesis. Further investigation is required to determine if these genes are translated in the embryonic and adult stages of development and to localize their expression to specific cell-types. Whether these genes are associated with stem cells, or with other differentiation factors in networks that influence cell-patterning throughout development, remain to be unequivocally determined.
Animals and Sampling
Treatment of the fish used in this study was in compliance with the regulations of the University of Victoria Animal Care Committee. Eggs from Atlantic salmon (McConnell (Mowi)) were obtained in November, 2009 from Marine Harvest United Hatchery (Fanny Bay, B.C., Canada). The eggs were fertilized by gently mixing the eggs and milt by hand and then washed with partial exchanges of water. Approximately 2000 fertilized eggs were then transferred and placed in Heath trays (Marisource) at the University of Victoria. The embryos and larvae were raised in fresh water at a temperature of 12°C and a flow rate of 200 liters/h. Fry were transferred from the Heath trays to 30-liter holding tanks following yolk sac absorption.
The day of fertilization was Day (D) 0, and hatching and yolk sac absorption occurred between D38 to D40 and D68 to D70, respectively. Whole embryos (n = 20) were collected every other day for three weeks. Larvae were collected every third day and then alevin and fry every sixth day for the remainder of the study. Samples were directly placed into dry ice and stored at - 80°C until RNA extraction.
The number of mortalities were counted on each collection day. We also took several pictures using a Nikon D300 s with a 105 mm 2.8 G_ED lens to record the progress of the development of the fish.
Twelve different Atlantic salmon (Mowi stock) tissues from three individual adult male and female fish were provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (West Vancouver Laboratories, West Vancouver, British Columbia). The six fish were euthanized, followed by rapid dissection of tissues (kidney, muscle, skin, gut, gill, spleen, brain, heart, gonad, liver, eye and pyloric caeca). The tissues were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen or dry ice and stored at -80°C until RNA extraction.
Reverse transcription and cDNA amplification
Total RNAs were extracted in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) by mixer-mill homogenization (Retsch) and spin-column purified using RNeasy Mini kits (Qiagen). The RNA from three whole embryos or two larvae or alevins was pooled for D2 to D20 and for D21 to D77 collections, respectively. RNA was extracted from portions of each adult tissue described above for each different fish. Each RNA sample was then quantified and quality-checked by spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies) and agarose gel, respectively.
The cDNAs were synthesized in 25-μL reactions from 200 ng to 1.0 μg total RNA using oligo(dT)15 (Promega) and Supercript II RNase H- reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 90 min and the transcriptase heat-inactivated at 70°C for 30 min. Approximately 100 to 200 ng of cDNA was used in each 25-μL PCR reaction containing 1.25 U Taq polymerase, 1 × Taq buffer, 1.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dNTPs (Invitrogen) and 15 pmol of each gene-specific 5'- and 3'-primer. Each PCR was carried out under the following cycling parameters: 94°C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec (or 58°C for sox9b), and 72°C for 1 min using a Perkin Elmer GeneAmp 9600. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.0 to 1.5% agarose gels and photographs were stored using an UVP GelDoc-It documentation system (Ultraviolet Products).
Genomic DNA to enable isolation of the cyp19b1 intron 1 was extracted from Atlantic salmon spleen using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit following instructions of the manufacturer (Qiagen).
PCR analysis of sex differentiation factor expression in adult tissue
PCRs were performed with an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95°C and then 35 cycles as follows: 30 sec of denaturation at 95°C, 30 sec of annealing at 55°C and 1 min of extension at 72°C using a Peltier Thermal Cycler PTC-225 (MJ Research). Amplicons for each gene of interest (GOI) were visualized on 1.0% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and images were stored using an UVP GelDoc-It documentation system (Ultraviolet Products). The intensity of the amplification products were semiquantitatively measured using ImageJ software  and divided by the intensity of the respective ubiquitin signals. The data generated was graphed in Microsoft Excel 2007 and expressed as the mean +/-SE of three individuals studied.
Gene identification and primer design
The primers used to amplify trout ovarian aromatase (cyp19a), brain aromatase (cyp19b1), dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenital, critical region on the X-chromosome, gene-1 and -2 (dax1 and 2), forkhead box L2 ortholog (foxl2a), forkhead box L2 diverged paralog (foxl2b), Mullerian inhibiting substance (mis), steroidogenic factor-1 (sf1), sex-determining region of the Y chromosome (SRY)-related high mobility group (HMG) box (SRY box) Sox9a (sox9a), Sox9b (sox9b), and ubiquitin (ubiq) were designed specifically against the sequences provided for each gene obtained from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. GenBank accession numbers, primer sets and product sizes for each GOI are shown in Additional file 12. The primer sets for each target gene were designed using Primer3 software  and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. The specificity of each primer set and the identity of each amplicon were confirmed by subsequent cloning into pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and sequencing.
BAC screening and sequencing
Atlantic salmon (AS) CHORI-214  bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries were obtained from BACPAC Resources, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI) . AS BAC library filters were hybridized with 75-mer oligonucleotide probes for each GOI (Integrated DNA Technologies) that were 5'-end-labeled with 32P-ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Invitrogen). Filter hybridizations were conducted as described by CHORI .
Confirmation of each GOI-containing BAC was performed by comparisons of Hind III restriction digests of the isolated clones to in silico digests for each BAC. BAC clones were chosen based on the physical BAC fingerprint map for Atlantic salmon that is publicly available on the internet Contig Explorer (iCE) version 3.5 . The BAC end sequence information, that is available in ASalBase , was also used for selection of the BAC clones.
BAC preparation and library construction
BAC DNA was isolated by an alkaline lysis procedure using Large Construct Isolation Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol. The isolated BAC DNA was nebulized and the DNA ends were made blunt by filling with T4 polymerase. The blunt-ended, repaired DNA was size fractioned by electrophoresis and the gel region corresponding to 1.5 to 3.0 kb was excised and gel purified (Qiagen). The fragments were blunt-end ligated into Sma1-cut M13mp19 vector and transformed into electrocompetent DH5α E. coli cells using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser system. Library quality was evaluated and high redundancy plating was followed by large-scale colony picking (Genetix). Extracted recombinant plasmid templates were sequenced on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer.
BAC alignment and annotation
Bases were called using PHRED [62, 63]. High quality sequence reads were assembled using PHRAP  and then viewed and edited using Consed . Some gaps in BAC assembly were filled by designing primers to the contiguous sequence ends, followed by amplification of the BAC region by PCR and subsequent cloning and sequencing of the fragments.
Each BAC has been deposited in GenBank as follows: BAC 33H18 containing dax1
[GenBank:HM159469]; BAC 105M10 containing dax2 [GenBank:HM159470]; BAC 217E24 containing foxl2a ortholog (pseudogene) [GenBank:HM159471]; BAC 261D01 containing foxl2b diverged paralog [GenBank:HM159472], and BAC 19C14 containing mis [GenBank:HM159473].
BAC clone sequence data were annotated using BLAST homolog searches and EMBOSS programs package . Alignment of cDNA sequences against genomic sequences was done by Sequin , which was obtained from NCBI. Identification of transposon insertions was performed using Dotter plots , comparing each GOI-containing BAC with salmon transposon sequences .
Fluorescent in situ hybridizations
BAC DNA was labeled with Spectrum Orange using a nick translation kit (Abbott Molecular). Human placental DNA (2 μg) and Cot-1 DNA (1 μg, prepared from Atlantic salmon) or Cot-1 DNA (1 μg, prepared from rainbow trout) were added to the probe mixture for blocking. Hybridizations were carried out at 37°C overnight and post-hybridization washes were as recommended by the manufacturer (Abbott Molecular) with minor modifications . Antibodies to Spectrum Orange (Molecular Probes) were used to amplify the signal. Slides were counter-stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a concentration of 125 ng DAPI in 1.0 mL antifade solution. Images were captured with a Jai camera and analyzed with Cytovision Genus (Applied Imaging, Inc.) software. Chromosomes were arranged according to size within the metacentric/submetacentric and acrocentric groups .
The chromosome preparations were obtained from blood of the Norwegian strain of Atlantic salmon (2N = 58) by methods described previously for salmonid fishes . Briefly, the buffy coat was isolated from whole blood and placed in MEM media with pen-strep, L-glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum and 200 µg/ml LPS and cultured for 6 days at 20°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation and re-suspended in 0.075 M KCl for 30 min, then fixed in 3:1 methanol acetic acid. Cell suspensions were dropped onto clean slides and allowed to dry on a slide warmer with humidity at 40°C.
To identify the location of potential transcription factor binding elements in the promoters of our GOI, we preliminarily used MatInspector (Genomatix Software GmbH). Our designation of OCT3/4 consensus binding motifs 5'-ACACGCAT-3' or 5'-ATTTGCAT-3' are based on work done in ES cells [20, 71]. The HMG domain that binds to DNA is highly conserved among all SOX factors (5'-(A/T)(A/T)CAA(A/T)G-3') . The SOX footprints that we also include in our analysis are based on work done on mammalian mis and cyp19 promoters . We use the term "immediate early response" element (IER) to identify response elements (5'-GCG(G/T)GGGCG-3') that potentially could bind early response products of genes such as EGR-1 and WT-1 . Sequences presumed or demonstrated to bind CRE, ERE, FOXL2, PPARE, RXR/RAR and SF-1 in other fish species are also presented for each promoter examined [16–18, 25, 53–55, 74].
- ARE :
androgen response element
- BMP :
bone morphogenetic protein
- CRE :
cyclic AMP response element
- EGR-1 :
early growth response-1
- ERE :
estrogen response element
- OCT3/4 :
octamer binding factor 3/4
- PPARE :
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor element
- RXR/RAR :
retinoid X receptor/retinoic acid receptor
- SMAD :
mothers against decapentaplegic
- SP-1 :
- TGFβ :
transforming growth factor β
- WNT :
wingless-related MMTV integration site.
This research was supported by Genome Canada, Genome BC and the Province of BC, and additionally by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (BFK, WSD). We are grateful to Marine Harvest for the generous donation of the Atlantic salmon eggs and to Robert Devlin (F.O.C., WestVan Lab., West Vancouver, B.C.) for providing adult fish. We are particularly indebted to Carlo Biagi, Wendy Vandersteen (RHD), Yvonne Lai and Krzysztof Lubieniecki (WSD) for their adept extractions and handling of tissues. We appreciate very much the help of Brendon Campbell, Amy Hoare and Brian Ringwood for egg transport and care of the young fish (Animal Care Services, University of Victoria). We thank Roderick Haesevoets, Sherri Brady and Stephanie Puckett for clone sequencing (CBR DNA Sequencing Facility, University of Victoria).
- Yao HH, Matzuk MM, Jorgez CJ, Menke DB, Page DC, Swain A, Capel B: Follistatin operates downstream of Wnt4 in mammalian ovary organogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2004, 230 (2): 210-215. 10.1002/dvdy.20042.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y, Capel B: Balancing the bipotential gonad between alternative organ fates: a new perspective on an old problem. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235 (9): 2292-2300. 10.1002/dvdy.20894.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park SY, Jameson JL: Minireview: transcriptional regulation of gonadal development and differentiation. Endocrinology. 2005, 146 (3): 1035-1042. 10.1210/en.2004-1454.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao HH: The pathway to femaleness: current knowledge on embryonic development of the ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005, 230 (1-2): 87-93. 10.1016/j.mce.2004.11.003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vizziano D, Randuineau G, Baron D, Cauty C, Guiguen Y: Characterization of early molecular sex differentiation in rainbow trout,Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dev Dyn. 2007, 236 (8): 2198-2206. 10.1002/dvdy.21212.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ijiri S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi T, Wang DS, Sakai F, Paul-Prasanth B, Nakamura M, Nagahama Y: Sexual dimorphic expression of genes in gonads during early differentiation of a teleost fish, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Biol Reprod. 2008, 78 (2): 333-341. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064246.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schalburg KR, Rise ML, Brown GD, Davidson WS, Koop BF: A comprehensive survey of the genes involved in maturation and development of the rainbow trout ovary. Biol Reprod. 2005, 72 (3): 687-99. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034967.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schalburg KR, McCarthy SP, Rise ML, Hutson JC, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Expression of morphogenic genes in mature ovarian and testicular tissues: potential stem-cell niche markers and patterning factors. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73 (2): 142-152. 10.1002/mrd.20359.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schalburg KR, Cooper GA, Yazawa R, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Microarray analysis reveals differences in expression of cell surface and extracellular matrix components during development of the trout ovary and testis. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2008, 3: 78-90.Google Scholar
- Ikeda Y, Swain A, Weber TJ, Hentges KE, Zanaria E, Lalli E, Tamai KT, Sassone-Corsi P, Lovell-Badge R, Camerino G, Parker KL: Steroidogenic factor 1 and Dax-1 colocalize in multiple cell lineages: potential links in endocrine development. Mol Endocrinol. 1996, 10 (10): 1261-1272. 10.1210/me.10.10.1261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang ZJ, Jeffs B, Ito M, Achermann JC, Yu RN, Hales DB, Jameson JL: Aromatase (Cyp19) expression is up-regulated by targeted disruption of Dax1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (14): 7988-7993. 10.1073/pnas.141543298.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay JJ, Viger RS: Nuclear receptor Dax-1 represses the transcriptional cooperation between GATA-4 and SF-1 in Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod. 2001, 64 (4): 1191-1199. 10.1095/biolreprod64.4.1191.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nachtigal MW, Hirokawa Y, Enyeart-VanHouten DL, Flanagan JN, Hammer GD, Ingraham HA: Wilms' tumor 1 and Dax-1 modulate the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 in sex-specific gene expression. Cell. 1998, 93 (3): 445-454. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81172-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baron D, Houlgatte R, Fostier A, Guiguen Y: Large-scale temporal gene expression profiling during gonadal differentiation and early gametogenesis in rainbow trout. Biol Reprod. 2005, 73 (5): 959-966. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041830.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamoto M, Wang DS, Suzuki A, Matsuda M, Nagahama Y, Shibata N: Dax1 suppresses P450arom expression in medaka ovarian follicles. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007, 74 (10): 1239-1246. 10.1002/mrd.20689.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang DS, Kobayashi T, Zhou LY, Paul-Prasanth B, Ijiri S, Sakai F, Okubo K, Morohashi K, Nagahama Y: Foxl2 up-regulates aromatase gene transcription in a female-specific manner by binding to the promoter as well as interacting with ad4 binding protein/steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Endocrinol. 2007, 21 (3): 712-725. 10.1210/me.2006-0248.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi S, Hirai T, Kitano T: Follicle-stimulating hormone signaling and Foxl2 are involved in transcriptional regulation of aromatase gene during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 359 (4): 935-940. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang X, Kobayashi T, Senthilkumaran B, Kobayashi-Kajura H, Sudhakumari CC, Nagahama Y: Two types of aromatase with different encoding genes, tissue distribution and developmental expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005, 141 (2): 101-115. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.11.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sekido R, Lovell-Badge R: Sex determination involves synergistic action of SRY and SF1 on a specific Sox9 enhancer. Nature. 2008, 453 (7197): 930-934. 10.1038/nature06944.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun C, Nakatake Y, Ura H, Akagi T, Niwa H, Koide H, Yokota T: Stem cell-specific expression of Dax1 is conferred by STAT3 and Oct3/4 in embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008, 372 (1): 91-96. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.154.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khalfallah O, Rouleau M, Barbry P, Bardoni B, Lalli E: Dax-1 knockdown in mouse embryonic stem cells induces loss of pluripotency and multilineage differentiation. Stem Cells. 2009, 27 (7): 1529-1537. 10.1002/stem.78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uhlenhaut NH, Jakob S, Anlag K, Eisenberger T, Sekido R, Kress J, Treier AC, Klugmann C, Klasen C, Holter NI, Riethmacher D, Schütz G, Cooney AJ, Lovell-Badge R, Treier M: Somatic sex reprogramming of adult ovaries to testes by FOXL2 ablation. Cell. 2009, 139 (6): 1130-1142. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schalburg KR, Yasuike M, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Regulation, expression and characterization of aromatase (cyp19b1) transcripts in ovary and testis of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2010, 155 (2): 118-125. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2009.10.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clipsham R, Niakan K, McCabe ER: Nr0b1 and its network partners are expressed early in murine embryos prior to steroidogenic axis organogenesis. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004, 4 (1): 3-14. 10.1016/j.modgep.2003.08.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galay-Burgos M, Gealy C, Navarro-Martín L, Piferrer F, Zanuy S, Sweeney GE: Cloning of the promoter from the gonadal aromatase gene of the European sea bass and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2006, 145 (1): 47-53. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.04.028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pannetier M, Fabre S, Batista F, Kocer A, Renault L, Jolivet G, Mandon-Pépin B, Cotinot C, Veitia R, Pailhoux E: FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development. J Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 36 (3): 399-413. 10.1677/jme.1.01947.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halm S, Rocha A, Miura T, Prat F, Zanuy S: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH/AMH) in the European sea bass: its gene structure, regulatory elements, and the expression of alternatively-spliced isoforms. Gene. 2007, 388 (1-2)): 148-158. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.10.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toffolo V, Belvedere P, Colombo L, Valle LD: Tissue-specific transcriptional initiation of the CYP19 genes in rainbow trout, with analysis of splicing patterns and promoter sequences. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007, 153 (1-3): 311-319. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.02.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro MB, Senapathy P: RNA splice junctions of different classes of eukaryotes: sequence statistics and functional implications in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15 (17): 7155-7174. 10.1093/nar/15.17.7155.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Z-M: Regulation of alternative RNA splicing by exon definition and exon sequences in viral and mammalian gene expression. J Biomed Sci. 2004, 11: 278-294. 10.1007/BF02254432.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Little TH, Zhang Y, Matulis CK, Weck J, Zhang Z, Ramachandran A, Mayo KE, Radhakrishnan I: Sequence-specific deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) recognition by steroidogenic factor 1: a helix at the carboxy terminus of the DNA binding domain is necessary for complex stability. Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 20 (4): 831-843. 10.1210/me.2005-0384.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Südbeck P, Scherer G: Two independent nuclear localization signals are present in the DNA-binding high-mobility group domains of SRY and SOX9. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (44): 27848-27852.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gasca S, Canizares J, De Santa Barbara P, Mejean C, Poulat F, Berta P, Boizet-Bonhoure B: A nuclear export signal within the high mobility group domain regulates the nucleocytoplasmic translocation of SOX9 during sexual determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (17): 11199-11204. 10.1073/pnas.172383099.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haqq CM, King CY, Donahoe PK, Weiss MA: SRY recognizes conserved DNA sites in sex-specific promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90 (3): 1097-1101. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.1097.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hagen G, Müller S, Beato M, Suske G: Cloning by recognition site screening of two novel GT box binding proteins: a family of Sp1 related genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20 (21): 5519-5525. 10.1093/nar/20.21.5519.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park GT, Morasso MI: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) transactivates Dlx3 through Smad1 and Smad4: alternative mode for Dlx3 induction in mouse keratinocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (2): 515-522. 10.1093/nar/30.2.515.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- ASalBase. [http://www.asalbase.org]
- de Boer JG, Yazawa R, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Bursts and horizontal evolution of DNA transposons in the speciation of pseudotetraploid salmonids. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 422-431. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-422.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teixeira J, Maheswaran S, Donahoe PK: Müllerian inhibiting substance: an instructive developmental hormone with diagnostic and possible therapeutic applications. Endocr Rev. 2001, 22 (5): 657-674. 10.1210/er.22.5.657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vigier B, Forest MG, Eychenne B, Bézard J, Garrigou O, Robel P, Josso N: Anti-Müllerian hormone produces endocrine sex reversal of fetal ovaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86 (10): 3684-3688. 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3684.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez-Marí A, Yan YL, Bremiller RA, Wilson C, Cañestro C, Postlethwait JH: Characterization and expression pattern of zebrafish Anti-Müllerian hormone (Amh) relative to sox9a, sox9b, and cyp19a1a, during gonad development. Gene Expr Patterns. 2005, 5 (5): 655-667.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morinaga C, Saito D, Nakamura S, Sasaki T, Asakawa S, Shimizu N, Mitani H, Furutani-Seiki M, Tanaka M, Kondoh H: The hotei mutation of medaka in the anti-Mullerian hormone receptor causes the dysregulation of germ cell and sexual development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (23): 9691-9696. 10.1073/pnas.0611379104.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmahl J, Kim Y, Colvin JS, Ornitz DM, Capel B: Fgf9 induces proliferation and nuclear localization of FGFR2 in Sertoli precursors during male sex determination. Development. 2004, 131 (15): 3627-3636. 10.1242/dev.01239.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nachtigal MW, Ingraham HA: Bioactivation of Müllerian inhibiting substance during gonadal development by a kex2/subtilisin-like endoprotease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93 (15): 7711-7716. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7711.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eimon PM, Harland RM: Effects of heterodimerization and proteolytic processing on Derrière and Nodal activity: implications for mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development. 2002, 129 (13): 3089-3103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishimatsu S, Thomsen GH: Ventral mesoderm induction and patterning by bone morphogenetic protein heterodimers in Xenopus embryos. Mech Dev. 1998, 74 (1-2): 75-88. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00070-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohe K, Tamai KT, Parvinen M, Sassone-Corsi P: DAX-1 and SOX6 molecular interplay results in an antagonistic effect in pre-mRNA splicing. Dev Dyn. 2009, 238 (6): 1595-1604. 10.1002/dvdy.21957.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niakan KK, Davis EC, Clipsham RC, Jiang M, Dehart DB, Sulik KK, McCabe ER: Novel role for the orphan nuclear receptor Dax1 in embryogenesis, different from steroidogenesis. Mol Genet Metab. 2006, 88 (3): 261-271. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.12.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006, 126 (4): 663-676. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lalli E, Ohe K, Hindelang C, Sassone-Corsi P: Orphan receptor DAX-1 is a shuttling RNA binding protein associated with polyribosomes via mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20 (13): 4910-4921. 10.1128/MCB.20.13.4910-4921.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lalli E, Ohe K, Latorre E, Bianchi ME, Sassone-Corsi P: Sexy splicing: regulatory interplays governing sex determination from Drosophila to mammals. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (3): 441-445. 10.1242/jcs.00249.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu B, Yang WH, Gerin I, Hu CD, Hammer GD, Koenig RJ: Dax-1 and steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) function as transcriptional coactivators for steroidogenic factor 1 in steroidogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29 (7): 1719-1734. 10.1128/MCB.01010-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Callard GV, Tchoudakova AV, Kishida M, Wood E: Differential tissue distribution developmental programming, estrogen regulation and promoter characteristics of cyp19 genes in teleost fish. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 79 (1-5): 305-314. 10.1016/S0960-0760(01)00147-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanda H, Okubo T, Omori N, Niihara H, Matsumoto N, Yamada K, Yoshimoto S, Ito M, Yamashita S, Shiba T, Takamatsu N: Transcriptional regulation of the rainbow trout CYP19a gene by FTZ-F1 homologue. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006, 99 (2-3): 85-92. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.12.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong TT, Ijiri S, Zohar Y: Molecular biology of ovarian aromatase in sex reversal: complementary DNA and 5'-flanking region isolation and differential expression of ovarian aromatase in the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Biol Reprod. 2006, 74 (5): 857-864. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.045351.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schalburg KR, Yazawa R, de Boer J, Lubieniecki KP, Goh B, Straub CA, Beetz-Sargent MR, Robb A, Davidson WS, Devlin RH, Koop BF: Isolation, characterization and comparison of Atlantic and Chinook salmon growth hormone 1 and 2. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 522-534. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-522.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Image J. [http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/]
- Primer3. [http://frodo.wi.mit.edu]
- Thorsen J, Zhu B, Frengen E, Osoegawa K, de Jong PJ, Koop BF, Davidson WS, Høyheim B: A highly redundant BAC library of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): an important tool for salmon projects. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6 (1): 50-57. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-50.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- CHORI - Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute. [http://bacpac.chori.org/highdensity.htm]
- iCE - internet Contig Explorer. [http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ice]
- Ewing B, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED. II Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 186-194.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 175-185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- PHRAP. [http://bozeman.mbt.washington.edu]
- Gordon D, Abajan C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 195-202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- EMBOSS. [http://emboss.sourceforge.net/]
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R: A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene. 1995, 167: GC1-10-10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phillips RB, Nichols KM, DeKoning JJ, Morasch MR, Keatley KA, Rexroad C, Gahr SA, Danzmann RG, Drew RE, Thorgaard GH: Assignment of rainbow trout linkage groups to specific chromosomes. Genetics. 2006, 174 (3): 1661-1670. 10.1534/genetics.105.055269.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phillips RB, Keatley KA, Morasch MR, Ventura AB, Lubieniecki KP, Koop BF, Danzmann RG, Davidson WS: Assignment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) linkage groups to specific chromosomes: conservation of large syntenic blocks corresponding to whole chromosome arms in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BMC Genet. 2009, 10: 46-56. 10.1186/1471-2156-10-46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun C, Nakatake Y, Akagi T, Ura H, Matsuda T, Nishiyama A, Koide H, Ko MS, Niwa H, Yokota T: Dax1 binds to Oct3/4 and inhibits its transcriptional activity in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29 (16): 4574-4583. 10.1128/MCB.01863-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson M, Koopman P: Matching SOX: partner proteins and co-factors of the SOX family of transcriptional regulators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002, 12 (4): 441-446. 10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00323-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay JJ, Drouin J: Egr-1 is a downstream effector of GnRH and synergizes by direct interaction with Ptx1 and SF-1 to enhance luteinizing hormone beta gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (4): 2567-2576.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang BY, Chan KM, Lin CM, Chen TT: Characterization of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) growth hormone 1 gene and the promoter region of growth hormone 2 gene. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997, 340 (2): 359-368. 10.1006/abbi.1997.9930.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.