Open Access

Histological and global gene expression analysis of the 'lactating' pigeon crop

  • Meagan J Gillespie1, 2,
  • Volker R Haring1,
  • Kenneth A McColl1,
  • Paul Monaghan1,
  • John A Donald2,
  • Kevin R Nicholas3,
  • Robert J Moore1 and
  • Tamsyn M Crowley1, 3Email author
BMC Genomics201112:452

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-452

Received: 20 April 2011

Accepted: 19 September 2011

Published: 19 September 2011



Both male and female pigeons have the ability to produce a nutrient solution in their crop for the nourishment of their young. The production of the nutrient solution has been likened to lactation in mammals, and hence the product has been called pigeon 'milk'. It has been shown that pigeon 'milk' is essential for growth and development of the pigeon squab, and without it they fail to thrive. Studies have investigated the nutritional value of pigeon 'milk' but very little else is known about what it is or how it is produced. This study aimed to gain insight into the process by studying gene expression in the 'lactating' crop.


Macroscopic comparison of 'lactating' and non-'lactating' crop reveals that the 'lactating' crop is enlarged and thickened with two very obvious lateral lobes that contain discrete rice-shaped pellets of pigeon 'milk'. This was characterised histologically by an increase in the number and depth of rete pegs extending from the basal layer of the epithelium to the lamina propria, and extensive proliferation and folding of the germinal layer into the superficial epithelium. A global gene expression profile comparison between 'lactating' crop and non-'lactating' crop showed that 542 genes are up-regulated in the 'lactating' crop, and 639 genes are down-regulated. Pathway analysis revealed that genes up-regulated in 'lactating' crop were involved in the proliferation of melanocytes, extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, the adherens junction and the wingless (wnt) signalling pathway. Gene ontology analysis showed that antioxidant response and microtubule transport were enriched in 'lactating' crop.


There is a hyperplastic response in the pigeon crop epithelium during 'lactation' that leads to localised cellular stress and expression of antioxidant protein-encoding genes. The differentiated, cornified cells that form the pigeon 'milk' are of keratinocyte lineage and contain triglycerides that are likely endocytosed as very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and repackaged as triglyceride in vesicles that are transported intracellularly by microtubules. This mechanism is an interesting example of the evolution of a system with analogies to mammalian lactation, as pigeon 'milk' fulfils a similar function to mammalian milk, but is produced by a different mechanism.


Both male and female pigeons (Columba livia) possess the ability to produce a complete nutrient substance, termed pigeon 'milk', for the nourishment of their young. Pigeons generally lay two eggs one day apart, which hatch 18 days after they are laid [1]. Two days before the first egg hatches, pigeon 'milk' begins to be produced in the crop of the parent birds. A similar substance is produced by flamingos [2] and male emperor penguins [3]. As in any other bird species, the normal function of the crop is as a food storage area located between the oesophagus and proventriculus where food is moistened before further break-down and digestion through the gastrointestinal tract [1]. During the process of pigeon 'lactation', a curd-like substance is regurgitated from the crop to the squab. Studies on pigeon 'milk' have shown that the dry matter is made up of 60% protein and the remainder is mostly fat (32-36%) and a small amount of carbohydrate (1-3%), in addition to the mineral (calcium, potassium, sodium, and phosphorus) content [4]. When this diet was artificially replicated and fed to squabs, their growth was either very poor or they died [5], which suggests there is a unique factor or factors present in pigeon 'milk' that is required for squab growth and development. Conversely, in a 1952 study where pigeon 'milk' was fed to chickens, their rate of growth improved by 38% [6]. Since this study, it has been shown that pigeon 'milk' contains IgA antibodies [7, 8], which provides further evidence to suggest that it is more than a nutrient based substance.

The physiological mechanisms governing pigeon 'milk' production and delivery are unknown. It is well documented that the pigeon crop is responsive to the lactogenic hormone prolactin [911], however, histological studies on pigeon crop tissue during 'lactation' suggest that the process is structurally unrelated to traditional mammalian lactation because the pigeon crop is not glandular and secretory processes do not seem to be involved [1214].

This study investigated the global gene expression profiles of pigeons that were 'lactating' as well as those that were not 'lactating' to identify genes that were differentially regulated in the pigeon crop during 'lactation'. Since the pigeon genome has not been sequenced and there are few gene sequences available in the public databases, we used a chicken microarray to probe gene expression in the pigeon crop. Publicly available pigeon genes have 98% nucleotide sequence identity to chicken (personal communication, A/Prof. Christophe Lefevre), and this chicken array has previously been shown to have utility in gene expression studies in other bird species [15].


Macroscopic and histological comparison of 'lactating' and non- 'lactating' pigeon crop

Macroscopic comparison of the 'lactating' and the non-'lactating' pigeon crop revealed two very different tissues (Figure 1). The pigeon crop lies between the distal oesophagus and the proximal end of the proventriculus. In its 'lactating' form, the crop is enlarged and has a thickened wall with two very obvious lateral lobes (Figure 1b). This contrasts with the non-'lactating' crop which is a thin-walled membranous sac (Figure 1a). When the 'lactating' crop is opened, the pigeon 'milk' appears as a bed of close-packed discrete rice-shaped pellets, each pellet being embedded in the mucosal surface of the lateral lobes (Figure 1c).
Figure 1

Macroscopic appearance of the pigeon crop sac. The non-'lactating' crop (A) has a completely different appearance to that of the 'lactating' crop (B). The lactating crop is more than twice the size of the non-'lactating' crop, with a thickened wall and two very obvious lateral lobes. When the 'lactating' crop is opened the pigeon 'milk' is seen as a bed of close-packed discrete rice-shaped pellets that are closely associated with the mucosal surface of the tissue (C). In contrast, the non-'lactating' crop is undifferentiated with minimal surrounding vasculature.

Histological examination of the wall of the lateral lobes in the 'lactating' crop (Figure 2) revealed a structure consistent with a number of previous detailed descriptions [1214]. Moving from the non-lactating region of the crop into a lactating lobe, there was increasing papillary hyperplasia of the epithelium. This was characterized, firstly, by an increase in the number, and depth, of rete pegs extending from the germinal (basal) layer of the epithelium down into the lamina propria. As these rete pegs became deeper, there was also a concomitant proliferation, and very extensive upward folding, of the germinal layer into the superficial epithelium (Figure 2a, b). At all levels, every microscopic fold of the germinal layer invested a branch of vascularised lamina propria, although these branches became progressively narrower, and the associated blood vessels more attenuated, approaching the luminal surface of the crop wall (Figure 2c, d). Within the microscopic folds of epithelium, the germinal layer was mitotically active, and usually 1 to 3 cells thick whereas the overlying nutritive layer [12], also only 3 or 4 cells thick, had a pink, highly eosinophilic appearance, indicating high protein content of the differentiated cells (Figure 2e, f) and a ground-glass appearance indicative of hypoxia.
Figure 2

Histological analysis of the pigeon crop sac. (A) Junction of the non-'lactating' and 'lactating' walls of the lateral lobe of the pigeon crop. There is evidence of early hyperplasia in the non-'lactating' region (black arrowhead) with the formation of small rete pegs. These rete pegs are more pronounced as the hyperplasia becomes more obvious (black arrows), and proliferation of the germinal layer into the epithelium is also apparent (white arrows). *: lamina propria. Haematoxylin and eosin. (B) Same as A but stained with Masson's trichrome. The vascularized lamina propria is stained green. (C) 'Lactating' epithelium of the lateral lobe. There is extensive proliferation and folding of the basal layer of the epithelium. Branches of lamina propria extend into the epithelium (white arrows), and become progressively more attenuated (thick black arrows). These vascularized branches are narrowest near the luminal surface of the crop (thin black arrows). Pigeon 'milk' rice-shaped pellets, composed of lipid-laden, parakeratinised cells, are embedded closely in the epithelium (black arrowheads). Haematoxylin and eosin. (D) Same as C, but stained with Masson's trichrome. The green branches of the lamina propria are seen more readily with this stain. (E) High magnification of the epithelial wall of the lateral lobe of the lactating crop. Small vascularized branches of the lamina propria (thick black arrows) originate from a major branch (white arrow). One, two or three layers of slightly basophilic basal cells line these branches (thin black arrows), but, more removed from the blood supply, the cells have an eosinophilic, ground-glass appearance (black arrowhead). Haematoxylin and eosin. (F) Same as E, but stained with Masson's trichrome. The vascularized branches of the lamina propria can be seen quite clearly, as can the regions of protein-rich cells. (G) Lactating epithelium stained with Oil Red O (X5). Lipid can be seen consistently throughout the epithelium and is not present in the lamina propria or basement membrane. (H) Magnified view (X20) of lipid droplets in the epithelia of 'lactating' pigeon crop.

Near the luminal surface of the crop, the nutritive layers within each microscopic fold of epithelium began to coalesce, forming a parakeratinised layer. Macroscopic folds of the epithelium then resulted in fusion of large tracts of this parakeratinised layer, the end-result being the formation of discrete 'milk' pellets composed of avascular epithelium (Figure 2c, d). The cells within the pellets are nucleated, and are almost uniformly vacuolated. An Oil Red O stain revealed that the vacuoles contained lipid (Figure 2g, h).

Cross-species microarray hybridisation profiling of the pigeon crop

A comparison of gene expression between four 'lactating' and four non-'lactating' female pigeon crops was made using pigeon cDNA hybridised to chicken long oligo-nucleotide microarrays [15]. When the data was subjected to Student's t-test using a significance value of p < 0.05, a list of 1181 genes were found to be differentially expressed between 'lactating' and non-'lactating'. Of these genes, 542 genes are up-regulated in the 'lactating' crop, and 639 genes are down-regulated. Of the genes up-regulated in 'lactating' crop, 113 are greater than 5-fold differentially expressed, and 407 are greater than 2-fold differentially expressed. Of the genes down-regulated in 'lactating' crop, 171 are more than 5-fold differentially expressed and 608 are greater than 2-fold differentially expressed. The data has been deposited into the public database ArrayExpress (accession: E-MEXP-3314).

Functional analysis of gene expression in the 'lactating' pigeon crop sac

Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed four pathways enriched in 'lactating' crop tissue; melanogenesis, extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, adherens junction and the wingless (wnt) signalling pathway (Table 1). The most enriched pathway, melanogenesis, represents 2.5% of all up-regulated genes, closely followed by the wnt signalling pathway, representing 2.2% of all up-regulated genes. The genes involved in the melanogenesis pathway range from 1.5-fold to 5.9-fold up-regulated in 'lactating' crop, the highest fold-change being that of the transcription factor, micropthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF). Histological examination of the crop (Figure 2) failed to identify the presence of pigmented melanosomes, which are the products of melanogenesis.
Table 1

Enriched KEGG pathways in 'lactating' crop transcriptome


% Total genes^

%Mapped genes*

p value





ECM-receptor interaction




Adherens junction




Wnt signalling pathway




Gene expression pathways that were identified as enriched in 'lactating' crop tissue.

^Total genes is the number of up-regulated genes (320) that could be identified by the DAVID program

*Mapped genes is the number of genes (76) that could be mapped to a KEGG pathway.

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed two molecular functions that have genes up-regulated only in the 'lactating' crop; those functions being motor activity and antioxidant activity (Figure 3). Inspection of the two genes with the molecular function motor activity reveals they are both genes encoding cytoplasmic dynein proteins (Table 2), which are involved in cellular transport via microtubules. Peroxiredoxin 1 represents the molecular function antioxidant activity, and is highly up-regulated in 'lactating' crop by 21-fold. Further investigation identified three genes encoding heat shock proteins (Additional file 1) which can also exert similar effects as antioxidant proteins. Analysis of genes annotated by gene ontology as having an immune function revealed three up-regulated genes that are platelet factors/mediators; CXCL4 (platelet factor 4), CD36 and coagulation factor VII (Additional file 2).
Figure 3

Gene ontology molecular function of genes differentially expressed in the 'lactating' pigeon crop sac. Differentially expressed genes that could be assigned a UniGene ID (496) were matched to any gene ontology GO Slim ID in the database. The number of genes in each molecular function is presented here. Genes with the molecular functions motor activity and antioxidant activity are present only in 'lactating' crop.

Table 2

Genes with a molecular function that is present only in 'lactating' crop sac

UniGene ID

Gene name

Fold change

p value

Motor activity (GO:0003774)


Dynein, cytoplasmic 2, heavy chain 1




Dynein, cytoplasmic 1, light intermediate chain 1



Antioxidant activity (GO:0016209)


Peroxiredoxin 1



Fold change and significance of genes that have a gene ontology molecular function that is present only in 'lactating' crop tissue.


The 'lactating' pigeon crop has a distinctly different appearance to the non-'lactating' crop that is reflected both macroscopically (Figure 1) and histologically (Figure 2). Global gene expression profiling of 'lactating' and non-'lactating' pigeon crop showed that gene expression patterns were also distinctly different in the 'lactating' crop as compared to the non-'lactating' crop.

The proliferation of the crop germinal epithelium (Figure 2) may be induced by the transcriptional stimulatory activity of micropthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) which is up-regulated in 'lactating' crop by 5.9-fold. This is a key gene in the melanogenesis pathway [16], which is enriched in 'lactating' crop (Table 3). There are two different signalling pathways that can participate in the signalling cascade that results in proliferation of melanocytes through the melanogenesis pathway; the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway [17] and the wingless (wnt) signalling pathway [16]. The wnt signalling pathway is enriched in 'lactating' crop (Table 1) whereby seven genes are up-regulated, including the wnt signalling receptor, Frizzled homolog 3, by 2.8-fold and beta-catenin, a mediator of MITF signalling [18], by 2.1-fold. As there is no evidence of melanocytes in the pigeon crop, in either its 'lactating' or 'resting' state, we propose that either MITF targets a different cell type in the pigeon crop or that the MITF probe on our chicken microarray is similar to another transcription factor in the pigeon that is important in inducing the proliferative signalling pathway during 'lactation'. These signalling pathways may act on a stem cell population that gives rise to the proliferative germinal epithelium which produces the cells that eventually form the tracts of parakeratinised cells termed pigeon 'milk' (Figure 2) through extracellular matrix-receptor interactions. This pathway is enriched in 'lactating' crop (Table 1), with 6 genes up-regulated (Table 3).
Table 3

Fold change and significance of genes involved in enriched KEGG pathways

UniGene ID

Gene name

Fold change

p value

Melanogenesis pathway


similar to Mitf; microphthalmia-associated transcription factor




wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 6




v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog




frizzled homolog 3 (Drosophila)




cAMP responsive element binding protein 3-like 3




cAMP responsive element binding protein 3




catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88 kDa




v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1



ECM-receptor interaction


similar to fatty acid translocase; similar to CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)




integrin, alpha 8




synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2C




collagen, type V, alpha 2




collagen, type III, alpha 1







Adherens junction


activin A receptor, type IB




casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide




protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 1




catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88 kDa




similar to TGF-beta type II receptor



Wnt signalling pathway


vang-like 2 (van gogh, Drosophila)




axin 2




wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 6




casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide




frizzled homolog 3 (Drosophila)




catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88 kDa




jun oncogene



Genes that are differentially expressed between 'lactating' and non-'lactating' crop and play a role in the KEGG pathways that were identified as enriched in 'lactating' crop tissue.

There are areas of cells in the 'lactating' crop that have an altered, ground-glass appearance (Figure 2e, f). We speculate that this is a result of hypoxia caused by lack of blood supply to the rapidly proliferating germinal cell layer of the pigeon crop, in addition to the oxidative by-products of this rapid proliferation. Peroxiredoxin 1, a major cytosolic antioxidant protein encoding gene involved in cell redox homeostasis is up-regulated by more than 21-fold in the 'lactating' crop (Table 2). Other markers of cellular stress include the heat shock proteins (hsp) family which proliferate in response to multiple types of cellular stress, including inflammation and hypoxia [19]. Three of these hsp genes (Additional file 1) are up-regulated in the 'lactating' crop by between 1.8 and 7.7-fold. As well as their role in stress response, they are likely to play an important role in protein folding and transport [20] in the 'lactating' crop, which produces 'milk' containing a high proportion of protein.

There are multiple immune genes up-regulated in the tissue (Table 4), including the gene encoding the chemokine CXCL4 or platelet factor 4 (1.6-fold up-regulated), a gene expressed by platelets [21], which suggests that there is platelet infiltration in the tissue. CD36 (5.3-fold up-regulated), a membrane glycoprotein, can function as a platelet adhesion mediator [22], and coagulation factor VII (1.8-fold up-regulated) is part of the clotting pathway stimulated by tissue damage [23]. It is possible that if antioxidant and immune proteins are present in pigeon 'milk', they are directly enhancing the immune system of the developing squab as well as protecting the parental crop tissue. Moreover, the gene encoding the somatostatin receptor, which has been shown to modulate intestinal activity and inhibit nutrient resorption during periods of inflammation [24], is up-regulated in the pigeon crop during 'lactation' by more than 2-fold (Additional file 1). This is not surprising, given that the pigeon crop is part of the gastrointestinal tract. A clear physiological change in the 'lactating' crop is that of lipid accumulation (Figure 2g, h). Dumont (1965) showed that this lipid is neutral unsaturated triglyceride, that it is present both in the pigeon crop and the pigeon 'milk', and has a nutritive function. Avian keratinocytes, in contrast to mammalian keratinocytes, can accumulate lipid during cornification of the epidermis [25]. It appears that in the evolution of the mechanism pigeon 'milk' production process, the pigeon crop has extended on the ability of keratinocytes to accumulate nutritive lipids, to produce a cellular substance for the nourishment of their young. During the process of pigeon 'milk' synthesis, the crop sac produces copious amounts of epidermis, composed of parakeratinised cells, which become cornified toward the luminal surface of the tissue (Figure 2). We found that there is an up-regulation of two Acyl-CoA synthetase genes (1.8 and 2.5-fold) in 'lactating' crop tissue. These genes encode enzymes that are part of the fatty acid oxidation pathway that precedes the synthesis of triglycerides in the cell [26]. The fatty acid precursors of these triglycerides are likely to be obtained through the blood supply from oxidised triglycerides of the adipose tissue or liver. This is in agreement with Garrison and Scow (1975) who proposed that crop triglyceride is sequestered from another organ through the blood supply [27]. Oxidised triglyceride is transported from the liver or adipose tissue as fatty acids on very-low density lipoproteins (VLDL) that enter the cell by endocytosis [26]. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the endocytosis pathway is enriched in 'lactating' crop (Table 1). Once triglycerides are synthesised in the cytoplasm of the cell, they are packaged into vesicles; the up-regulation of cytoplasmic dynein in 'lactating' crop (dynein cytoplasmic 1, light intermediate chain 1; 1.9-fold, and dynein cytoplasmic 2, heavy chain 1; 2.5-fold) suggests that pigeon crop triglyceride is transported via the microtubules to vacuoles within the cell (Figure 2g, h).
Table 4

Genes differentially expressed between 'lactating' and non-'lactating' pigeon crop that have an immune function

UniGene ID

   Gene name

   Fold change

   p value


   Similar to Toll-like receptor 21




   CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)




   Bone morphogenetic protein 4




   Cytokine receptor-like factor 3




   Thymocyte selection-associated high mobility group box




   Serologically defined colon cancer antigen 8




   Coagulation factor VII (serum prothrombin conversion accelerator) (F7)




   Mitochondria-associated protein involved in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor signal transduction




   Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4




   Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 17




   Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 1




   Hypothetical LOC420181




   Receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 2




   Immunoresponsive 1 homolog (mouse)




   Stromal antigen 2




   Interleukin 18 receptor 1




   Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20




   Replication factor C (activator 1) 1, 145 kDa




   Similar to chronic myelogenous leukemia tumor antigen 66




   Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2




   Recombination activating gene 2




   Similar to suppressor of cytokine signalling 1




   Suppressor of cytokine signalling 7



Fold change and significance of genes that have an immune function.

This study has provided a snap-shot view of some of the processes occurring when 'lactation' in the pigeon crop is well established. Due to the unusual nature of 'lactation' in the pigeon it would be interesting to investigate the early stages of the differentiation and development of the crop in preparation for 'milk' production to further ascertain gene expression patterns that characterise crop development and 'lactation' in the pigeon. The use of pigeon-specific genomic or transcriptomic material would allow the identification of genes that are unique to the pigeon or that are dissimilar enough to the chicken to elude identification using a cross-species method.


The study of gene expression in the 'lactating' crop is starting to shed light on the biological processes occurring during this unusual biological process. The evolution of pigeon crop 'milk' production appears to have developed from the ability of avian keratinocytes to accumulate lipid. The picture that emerges from an analysis of gene expression changes in the crop is of a process that is characterised by a hyperplastic response in the pigeon crop epithelium which results in the accumulation of lipid-containing, cornified keratinocytes in the crop lumen. This leads to localised cellular stress and subsequent expression of antioxidant protein-encoding genes including peroxiredoxin 1. This hypothesised functional explanation is consistent with the histological examination of the 'lactating' crop presented here and in other studies.


Sample collection

Eight pairs of King pigeons were purchased from Kooyong Squab Producers (Moama, New South Wales). They were housed in temperature-controlled cabinets (between 21-24°C) with a 12 hour light cycle (lights on 6 am), and supplied with nest bowls and nesting materials. Pigeons had ad lib access to pigeon mix (pro-vit-min, Ivorsons, Geelong) and water. Four pairs were culled prior to mating, making up the non-'lactating' group, and the other four were culled 48 hours post-hatch of the first squab; the 'lactating' group. Crop tissue samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and separate samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histology.

All work using animals was conducted in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (7th edition), and in accordance with institutional animal ethics guidelines (CSIRO AAHL Animal Ethics Committee).

RNA isolation, labelling and microarray hybridisation

Total RNA was isolated from the crop tissue of four female 'lactating' pigeons and four female non-'lactating' pigeons using TriReagant RT (Molecular Research Centre) with an additional high salt solution step to precipitate glycoproteins. cDNA labelled with Cy3 (Kreatech) was synthesised from 5 μg of total RNA using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) with oligo(dT)20 primer and concentrated to less than 4 μl using a microcon YM-30 column (Millipore). Custom 20 k chicken long oligonucleotide microarrays [15] were blocked with 5 mL pre-hybridisation solution (25% Formamide, 5XSSC, 1% SDS, 1% BSA, 0.1% salmon sperm DNA) at 42°C for one hour in an incubation chamber, rinsed with double distilled water and dried in a centrifuge (5 minutes at 195 × g). Pre-hybridised microarrays were hybridised with hybridisation buffer containing the labelled cDNA probe (25% Formamide, 5XSSC, 0.6% SDS, 25% kreablock to 30 μl) for 16 hours at 42°C in a water bath. They were then washed with gentle agitation in 2XSSC, 0.1% SDS for 1 minute, 0.2XSSC, 0.1% SDS for 10 minutes and twice in 0.1XSSC for 1 minute. After drying the slides by centrifugation (5 minutes at 195 × g) they were scanned at three exposure times (0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 seconds) using an arrayWoRx scanner (Applied Precision) and aligned to the microarray template to correlate each spot to an oligo-nucleotide identifier, using softWoRx tracker (Applied Precision).

Quality control and statistical analysis

The most appropriate scanning exposure time was selected by choosing the datasets with the least number of saturated spots (scanning intensity > 65,000) and the highest number of spots above the average background (cell method of background calculation). The datasets were then normalised by multiplying the spot actual intensity (spot median intensity minus spot background intensity) by a nominal value of one million and dividing by the sum of all spot actual intensities. The datasets were exported into GeneSpring (Silicon Genetics) for statistical analysis and further normalised to the spot median intensity. A list of oligonucleotides that had a significantly different level of expression between conditions was obtained by applying a Student's t-test assuming unequal variances with a false discovery rate of p = 0.05.

Gene functional categorisation and pathways analysis

GO annotations were assigned to the microarray probes via UniGene IDs. The probe sequences were matched with the chicken UniGenes Build #41 downloaded from NCBI using MegaBlast v2.2.21 [28]. The matching UniGene IDs were then used to link the probes with GO annotations and GOslim terms from the gene association and protein cross-references files for chicken, release 3.56 This resulted in GO annotations for 41% of the probes on the microarray. The number of genes up or down-regulated in each GOSlim molecular function category was determined for each differentially expressed gene with a GO annotation, and graphed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA).

To identify pathways of interest important to pigeon 'lactation', only up-regulated genes were further investigated using the DAVID functional annotation tool [29]. It was used to determine which Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were enriched during pigeon 'lactation' using an ease score of 0.1. UniGene gene identifiers were converted to DAVID identifiers using the DAVID Gene ID conversion tool.

Histological examination

Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 4 μm were cut, dewaxed with xylene, rehydrated through a series of ethanol washes and stained with either haematoxylin and eosin or Masson's trichrome. Masson's trichrome stained muscle red and collagen blue.

Separate pieces of tissue were snap frozen in OCT and sections of 8 μm were cut with a cryostat, stained with oil red O and counterstained with haematoxylin as per the method of [30].



The authors would like to thank Dr. John Lowenthal and Dr. Julie Sharp for early discussions regarding pigeon 'milk', and Dr. John Bingham and Dr. Deborah Middleton for advice regarding histology. Thanks to Ms Leona McLaren of Kooyong Squab for supplying the pigeons, Ms Susanne Wilson for husbandry and macroscopic photography of pigeon tissues, Mr Nicholas Kieselbach and Mr Adam Stein for pigeon husbandry, and Mrs. Jean Payne and Mrs. Jenni Harper for processing the histology samples.

Authors’ Affiliations

CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University
Institute for Technology Research and Innovation, Deakin University


  1. Levi WM: The Pigeon. 1951, R. L. Bryan Company, 3Google Scholar
  2. Studer-Thiersch A: Beitrage zur brutbiologie der flamingos (Gattung phoenicopterus). Der Zoologische garten. 1967, 34: 159-229.Google Scholar
  3. Prevost JaVV: Histologie de la secretion oesophagienne du manchot empereur. Proceedings of the 13th international ornithological congress. 1962, 2: 1085-1094.Google Scholar
  4. Davies WL: The composition of the crop milk of pigeons. Biochem J. 1939, 33: 898-901.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Guareschi C: Necessita di fattori alimentari materni per l'accrescimento del giovanissimi colombi. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1936, 11: 411-412.Google Scholar
  6. Pace DM, Landolt PA, Mussehl FE: The effect of pigeon crop-milk on growth in chickens. Growth. 1952, 16: 279-285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goudswaard J, van der Donk JA, van der Gaag I, Noordzij A: Peculiar IgA transfer in the pigeon from mother to squab. Dev Comp Immunol. 1979, 3: 307-319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kocianova E, Rehacek J, Lisak V: Transmission of antibodies to Chlamydia psittaci and Coxiella burnetii through eggs and "crop milk" in pigeons. Eur J Epidemiol. 1993, 9: 209-212. 10.1007/BF00158794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Riddle O, Bates RW, Dykshorn S: A new hormone of the anterior pituitary. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1931, 29: 1211-1212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicoll CS: Bioassay of prolactin. Analysis of the pigeon crop-sac response to systemic prolactin injection by an improved method of response quantification. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1969, 60: 91-100.Google Scholar
  11. Forsyth IA, Buntin JD, Nicoll CS: A pigeon crop sac radioreceptor assay for prolactin. J Endocrinol. 1978, 79: 349-356. 10.1677/joe.0.0790349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumont JN: Prolactin-induced cytologic changes in the mucosa of the pigeon crop during crop- "milk" formation. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1965, 68: 755-782. 10.1007/BF00343930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weber W: Zur histologie und cytologie der kropfmilchbildung der taube. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1962, 56: 247-276. 10.1007/BF00325118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Litwer G: Die Histologischen veranderungen der kropfwandung bei tauben, zur zeit der bebrutung und ausfutterung ihrer jungen. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1926, 695-722.Google Scholar
  15. Crowley TM, Haring VR, Burggraaf S, Moore RJ: Application of chicken microarrays for gene expression analysis in other avian species. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10 (Suppl 2): S3-10.1186/1471-2164-10-S2-S3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Takeda K, Yasumoto K, Takada R, Takada S, Watanabe K, Udono T, Saito H, Takahashi K, Shibahara S: Induction of melanocyte-specific microphthalmia-associated transcription factor by Wnt-3a. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 14013-14016. 10.1074/jbc.C000113200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hemesath TJ, Price ER, Takemoto C, Badalian T, Fisher DE: MAP kinase links the transcription factor Microphthalmia to c-Kit signalling in melanocytes. Nature. 1998, 391: 298-301. 10.1038/34681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schepsky A, Bruser K, Gunnarsson GJ, Goodall J, Hallsson JH, Goding CR, Steingrimsson E, Hecht A: The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor Mitf interacts with beta-catenin to determine target gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 8914-8927. 10.1128/MCB.02299-05.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Leppa S, Sistonen L: Heat shock response--pathophysiological implications. Ann Med. 1997, 29: 73-78. 10.3109/07853899708998745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M: Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science. 2002, 295: 1852-1858. 10.1126/science.1068408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kowalska MA, Rauova L, Poncz M: Role of the platelet chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) in hemostasis and thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2010, 125: 292-296. 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Silverstein RL, Febbraio M: CD36, a scavenger receptor involved in immunity, metabolism, angiogenesis, and behavior. Sci Signal. 2009, 2: re3-10.1126/scisignal.272re3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Monroe DM, Key NS: The tissue factor-factor VIIa complex: procoagulant activity, regulation, and multitasking. J Thromb Haemost. 2007, 5: 1097-1105. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02435.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Op den Bosch J, Adriaensen D, Van Nassauw L, Timmermans JP: The role(s) of somatostatin, structurally related peptides and somatostatin receptors in the gastrointestinal tract: a review. Regul Pept. 2009, 156: 1-8. 10.1016/j.regpep.2009.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lavker RM: Lipid synthesis in chick epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1975, 65: 93-101. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12598065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson DL, Cox MM: Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. 2005, W. H. Freeman and Company, 4Google Scholar
  27. Garrison MM, Scow RO: Effect of prolactin on lipoprotein lipase in crop sac and adipose tissue of pigeons. Am J Physiol. 1975, 228: 1542-1544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4: 44-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cholewiak RW, Butcher L, Kettlewell NM: Oil red O and hematoxylin: A rapid histologic technic. Physiol Behav. 1968, 3: 585-586. 10.1016/0031-9384(68)90018-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Gillespie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.