Ancestral synteny shared between distantly-related plant species from the asterid (Coffea canephora and Solanum Sp.) and rosid (Vitis vinifera) clades
- Romain Guyot†1,
- Florent Lefebvre-Pautigny†2,
- Christine Tranchant-Dubreuil1,
- Michel Rigoreau2,
- Perla Hamon1,
- Thierry Leroy3,
- Serge Hamon1,
- Valérie Poncet1,
- Dominique Crouzillat2 and
- Alexandre de Kochko1Email author
© Guyot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 October 2011
Accepted: 20 March 2012
Published: 20 March 2012
Coffee trees (Rubiaceae) and tomato (Solanaceae) belong to the Asterid clade, while grapevine (Vitaceae) belongs to the Rosid clade. Coffee and tomato separated from grapevine 125 million years ago, while coffee and tomato diverged 83-89 million years ago. These long periods of divergent evolution should have permitted the genomes to reorganize significantly. So far, very few comparative mappings have been performed between very distantly related species belonging to different clades. We report the first multiple comparison between species from Asterid and Rosid clades, to examine both macro-and microsynteny relationships.
Thanks to a set of 867 COSII markers, macrosynteny was detected between coffee, tomato and grapevine. While coffee and tomato genomes share 318 orthologous markers and 27 conserved syntenic segments (CSSs), coffee and grapevine also share a similar number of syntenic markers and CSSs: 299 and 29 respectively. Despite large genome macrostructure reorganization, several large chromosome segments showed outstanding macrosynteny shedding new insights into chromosome evolution between Asterids and Rosids. We also analyzed a sequence of 174 kb containing the ovate gene, conserved in a syntenic block between coffee, tomato and grapevine that showed a high-level of microstructure conservation. A higher level of conservation was observed between coffee and grapevine, both woody and long life-cycle plants, than between coffee and tomato. Out of 16 coffee genes of this syntenic segment, 7 and 14 showed complete synteny between coffee and tomato or grapevine, respectively.
These results show that significant conservation is found between distantly related species from the Asterid (Coffea canephora and Solanum sp.) and Rosid (Vitis vinifera) clades, at the genome macrostructure and microstructure levels. At the ovate locus, conservation did not decline in relation to increasing phylogenetic distance, suggesting that the time factor alone does not explain divergences. Our results are considerably useful for syntenic studies between supposedly remote species for the isolation of important genes for agronomy.
KeywordsComparative genomics Synteny Genome evolution Coffea Vitis Solanum
Based on available Expressed Sequences Tags (EST) databases , a large set of conserved single-copy genes, designated as putative orthologous genes or COSII, were selected in silico between Asterid plant species (eight species including C. canephora and S. lycopersicum) and the Rosid model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. These COSII were used as valuable markers to construct genetic maps [10–12] to perform comparative mapping and to study chromosomal evolution in the Solanaceae . Recently, using 257 COSII markers, a genetic map for the coffee tree was constructed and compared to that of the tomato . Comparative mapping revealed that despite extensive rearrangements, a high level of conservation was detected between the coffee tree and the tomato, reinforcing the assessment of Rubiaceae and Solanaceae as "sister" plant families .
The Vitaceae family is another economically important family of angiosperms since it includes the Vitis vinifera species, known as the grapevine, a perennial plant, cultivated to be used as fruit or for beverage production. Recent phylogenetic analyses have placed the Vitaceae family as the earliest diverging lineage of the Rosid clade, which allows us to consider this family as the "sister" group of all other Rosid plant species . Despite a fairly small genome size of about 475 Mbp  the presence of a high chromosome number (x = 19) suggested an ancestral polyploidy event of the grapevine genome . Analysis of the draft sequence of the grapevine genome indicated both a complete absence of recent whole genome duplications and the contribution of ancient duplication events to the genome organization of the grapevine as well as to all of the Rosid species .
The grapevine and the coffee tree diverged from their last common ancestor approximately 114-125 MYA (Figure 1) , a long period of divergent evolution that should permit numerous chromosomal rearrangements to accumulate, allowing the genomes to reorganize significantly. So far, very few comparative mappings have been performed between very distantly related species belonging to two different clades, dicotyledonous or monocotyledonous [19–21]. Using genetic maps based on Expressed-Sequence Tags (EST) markers, four dicotyledonous crop species were compared to Arabidopsis, revealing common genome segments in a complex fragmented arrangement probably due to successive whole genome duplication in Arabidopsis . In a pilot case study, Salse and coworkers  evaluated the synteny relationships between monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species, which had diverged 146-161 MYA, using rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis genomes as models. In accordance with the relatively long period of evolution reinforced by successive whole genome duplications in both lineages, a very low level of synteny was observed between these two species.
Pairwise comparative mapping studies have been performed within the Solanaceae  and between the tomato and the coffee tree [8, 14, 23], all species belonging to the Asterid I clade. However, no multiple comparisons have been conducted using Solanaceae, the coffee tree and the distantly related grapevine species, from the basal Rosid clade, to detect synteny, or to study the pattern of chromosomal evolution between species that have not experienced recent polyploidization. Recently, extensive conservation of the microsynteny was described at the EIN4 locus between the coffee tree and the grapevine , suggesting that genome microstructure may be preserved over a long period of evolution. Such intriguing microsynteny raised the question of the extent of genome microstructure conservation and the possible presence of macrostructure conservation between the distantly related coffee tree and grapevine genomes.
Here, to better understand the structural relationships between coffee tree, tomato and grapevine genomes, and then to evaluate the genome conservation and evolution over the past 114-125 MY, we combined comparative mapping at the macro and micro-scale levels. Using a set of genetically mapped COSII sequences in the coffee tree and in the tomato, we identified numerous syntenic blocks in the grapevine genome sequence, providing evidence that segmental rearrangements have occurred since the divergence between the coffee tree and the tomato. Using a BAC clone sequence at the ovate locus, we investigated conservation at the macro- and micro-scale levels of the ovate region between Rubiaceae, Solanaceae and Vitaceae plant families.
Coffee mapping population
A COSII consensus reference genetic map of C. canephora was developed by Nestlé R&D (France) in collaboration with the Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute (ICCRI) . This map is derived from a segregating population of 93 F1 individuals issued from a cross between two highly heterozygous genotypes: a Congolese group genotype (BP409) and a Congolese-Guinean hybrid parent (Q121).
Coffee genetic map
COSII markers were mapped into the coffee mapping population (BP409 × Q121) using three types of polymorphism: RFLP, SNP or SSR ( and MoccaDB, http://moccadb.mpl.ird.fr for sequence, primer details, polymorphism and PCR conditions). The linkage analysis and map calculations were performed using JoinMap® software version 4 [25, 26] similarly as in Lefebvre-Pautigny et al. . Genetic maps were drawn using MapChart software version 2.1 .
Tomato mapping population
The tomato map used in this study (Tomato EXPAN-2000) is based on 80 F2 individuals from the cross Solanum lycopersicum LA925 × Solanum pennellii LA716 [12, 13]. The tomato genetic map, used in this study and including all COSII markers is available at http://solgenomics.net/cview/map.pl?map_version_id=52.
Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) data set
The grapevine reference genome sequences were downloaded from http://www.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/ (Accessions: FN597015FN597047). Annotated coding sequences (CDS), representing 26,346 gene models were retrieved at the same location.
Identification of orthologous sequences and syntenic blocks between coffee tree and grapevine and between tomato and grapevine
Coffee and tomato unigene sequences for each COSII loci were retrieved from the SOL Website http://solgenomics.net/ in April 2011. To identify orthologous COSII gene sequences based on sequence similarities between coffee (or tomato) COSII sequences and the grapevine genome, we performed BlastN and BlastX analyses. We used a BlastN with E-value significance thresholds of 10-10 and 10-6. COSII sequences not identified in the grapevine genome were then used as a query for BLASTN searches against grapevine EST and BlastX searches using the successive E-value significance thresholds of 10-30, 10-20 and 10-5 against grapevine CDS. According to the results observed and based on a balance between sensibility and background, we selected a BlastN E-value of 10-6 to identify orthologous COSII sequences. Sequences were considered as putative grapevine orthologs if only a single hit at a single position was found on the reference genome. A conserved syntenic segment (CSS) was defined by a minimum of three coffee or tomato COSII sequences that map to the same grapevine region at a maximal distance of 3,2 Mbp between pairs of markers. This genomic distance covers about 200 genes, when approximated by the Vitis genome size, 475 Mb  and the predicted number of genes, 30,434 http://www.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/. For sequences anchored on the coffee genetic map, we selected a maximum genetic distance of 12 cM between pairs of syntenic markers, which correspond to about 1% of the coffee genetic map (1349 cM). The maximum distance for syntenic COSII sequences on the tomato genetic map was set to 14 cM, representing 1% of the tomato genetic map (1463 cM). This maximal distances were selected according to the methodology developed by Jung et al. , taking into account the phylogenic distances between our study species and genome coverage data of the available maps.
BAC identification and sequencing
The BAC Clone 111O18 was identified in the C. canephora BAC library using high-density filter hybridizations and PCR amplifications with two coffee genes (SGN-U311255 and SGN-U628122) corresponding to genes coded BAC19.5 and BAC19.3 present at the ovate locus (AF273333). BAC sequencing was performed using the Sanger method (GATC) with a final quality of Phred 20 (Accession#: HM635075).
Sequence analysis and annotation methods
The final BAC sequence was analyzed and annotated similarly as in Guyot et al. ; and Yu et al. . De novo prediction of TEs was performed manually and putative TEs described as in previous studies [23, 30].
Analysis of the microsynteny with solanaceae and Vitis genomes
Local conservation of gene order and orientation was investigated between the coffee tree and Solanaceae by direct comparison of orthologous BAC sequences downloaded from NCBI: EF517793 petunia, EF517791 eggplant, EF517792 pepper, AF273333 tomato and EF517794 potato. Sequence comparisons were computed by Dotter and BLAST. The orthologous grapevine ovate region was identified by BLAST searches using predicted coffee coding regions as queries similarly as in Guyot et al. (2009) and Yu and Guyot et al. (2011) [23, 29].
Macrosynteny between the coffee tree and the tomato using COSII mapping data
Number of orthologous markers and characteristics of conserved Syntenic segment between coffee, tomato and grapevine genomes
# Orthologous markers
Mean CSS size
Max CSS size
Mean number of syntenic marker per CSS
Mean distance between adjacent syntenic markers
6 (Max: 16)
6 (Max: 14)
5 (Max: 17)
In four cases, all the syntenic blocks defined on a single coffee LG were related to a single tomato LG: D and 3, H and 8, J and 4, K and 5 (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Macrosynteny between the coffee tree and the grapevine by in silico comparative mapping of COSII sequences
Coffee and tomato unigene sequences for each mapped COSII locus were then used as queries to the BLAST against a total of 485 Mbp of the grapevine genome assembled and released to the public http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/ to identify coffee-grapevine homologs. Out of a total of 430 COSII loci mapped in coffee, 356 (83%) were found conserved on available grapevine genomic sequences, while 74 were found absent using the BLASTN E-value < 10-6 as a cutoff (See Material and Methods). Out of these 74 COSII sequences, apparently absent from the grapevine genome, 26 were found conserved in grapevine-expressed sequences and 69 were found conserved in grapevine annotated CDS (using the BLASTX algorithm, E-value < 10-5). These results suggest that most of the initially absent COSII were finally detected on the grapevine genome but with higher E-values.
Out of the 356 COSII sequences conserved between coffee and grapevine, 299 (84%) mapped to a single locus on the grapevine genome, and were then considered as putative orthologs of coffee COSII loci since COSII were initially selected to correspond to single copy genes . These findings are consistent with an absence of recent polyploidy in the grapevine genome. However, 57 COSII loci gave multiple matches and may correspond to members of gene families specifically expanded in grapevine genomes compared to coffee or tomato ones, whose sequences were used for the COSII loci definition . Consequently, as this makes the grapevine genome more difficult to identify and scrambling our interpretation of the results, these COSII loci were excluded.
Out of the 299 single-locus grapevine COSII sequences, 282 were found on assembled pseudochromosomes. Four putative orthologs fell into segments assigned to known chromosomes but with unknown positions and 13 orthologs were found in contigs unallocated to specific grapevine chromosomes (Additional file 3: Table S2). These 17 COSII sequences were then excluded from our analysis.
The distribution of COSII sequences conserved along coffee and grapevine chromosomes showed that the putative orthologs are distributed all along the coffee linkage groups. The 282 single-locus conserved COSII sequences were further used for the macrosynteny analysis.
Macrosynteny between the tomato and the grapevine by in silico comparative mapping of COSII loci
Mapped tomato COSII sequences were used to establish the synteny with grapevine sequences as we did to establish the synteny between coffee and grapevine. Out of a total of 755 COSII loci mapped in the tomato, 567 (75%) were found conserved on the available grapevine genome, while 188 were not found. Out of the 567 COSII sequences conserved between tomato and grapevine, 470 (82.9%) mapped to a single locus on the grapevine genome and were thus considered as putative orthologs of tomato COSII loci. A total of 45 syntenic blocks were observed between the two species (Additional file 5: Table S4). The mean number of syntenic COSII per blocks was five with a mean number of four interspaced non syntenic markers. The mean size of each syntenic block was 13.6 cM on the tomato genetic map corresponding to 3.9 Mb in the grapevine genome (Table 1). The highest number of syntenic relationships was established between tomato LG 4 and the grapevine chromosome 18 (Additional file 5: Table S4), with 17 COSII orthologous relationships (over 11.7 Mb for grapevine and 69.6 cM for tomato). Unlike coffee, no conservation between specific tomato LG and grapevine chromosome was observed because tomato CSSs from a unique LG always mapped to several grapevine chromosomes.
Macrosynteny among coffee, tomato and grapevine genomes
Based on the pairwise synteny established here, we drew an overview of the macrosyntenic relationships among coffee tree, tomato and grapevine genomes based on COSII-mapped loci (Figure 3). By comparing the location of these blocks among the three genomes, it is clear that numerous blocks that we identified in one pairwise analysis were found to completely or partially overlap blocks identified in other pairwise analyses, indicating that a substantial number of blocks of synteny may be conserved among the three species. All grapevine chromosomes were found covered by at least one conserved block of synteny from the two other species. Three examples of the detailed analysis of macrosynteny are shown in Additional file 6: Figure S2. Blocks of synteny appear differentially rearranged among coffee, tomato and grapevine, suggesting that profound reorganization of the genomes of the three species has occurred since their divergence. All the syntenic blocks found on the coffee Linkage Group C (LG C) are orthologous to grapevine chromosome 5 (V5) but combine two blocks with tomato Linkage Groups 1 and 9, suggesting that a translocation occurred in the tomato compared to coffee and grapevine. Thus, LG C and V5 may represent the ancestral chromosomal arrangement. Similarly, the coffee Linkage Group D displays only two adjacent syntenic blocks present on the tomato Linkage Group 3 while they spread on two grapevine chromosomes (9 and 17). In this case we may suppose that the grapevine experienced a chromosomal break followed by a translocation of the block after the separation of the Rosid and Asterid clades or a break in the shared lineage. The majority of the tomato Linkage Group 7 was found conserved with two segments in the coffee Linkage Groups E and F, suggesting a breakpoint arrangement in coffee as previously reported . Each coffee chromosomal segment was found further fragmented into two syntenic fragments in grapevine chromosomes 19, 12, 8 and 11 (Additional file 6: Figure S2). These combined results suggest that the coffee tree, tomato and grapevine genomes, although presenting numerous conserved segments, have undergone extensive rearrangements leading to specific chromosomal evolution since their divergence from their last common ancestor.
Synteny of the ovate regions among the coffee tree, tomato and grapevine species
To determine if agronomical important genes may be conserved in syntenic blocks between the coffee tree, the tomato and the grapevine, we decided to identify, map and compare the ovate regions in the coffee tree, the grapevine and several Solanaceae. The ovate locus was previously identified on tomato Linkage Group 2 in a major QTL affecting fruit shape . It is also involved in determining fruit shape in pepper . This region was sequenced in the tomato , in four other Solanaceae species  and in Antirrhinum.
To determine the relative position of the ovate region in the tomato we used Blast searches of COSII and ovate loci against the recent release of the preliminary tomato chromosome assembly. The ovate gene was identified on chromosome 2 (position 42,945 kb) between the C2_At4g36530 and C2_At3g01480 COSII genes (Figure 4). Our combined data suggest that the ovate region is conserved within a syntenic block between the coffee tree, the tomato and the grapevine.
Microsynteny among solanaceae, the coffee tree and the grapevine at the ovate locus
In conclusion, the overall conservation analysis of the gene content, order and structure among five species in Solanaceae, the coffee tree and the grapevine suggests that microstructure may be conserved in syntenic blocks among coffee, tomato and grapevine genomes. Surprisingly our analysis indicates better conservation of the microsynteny between the coffee tree and the grapevine than between the coffee tree and the Solanaceae at the ovate locus. The detailed analyses of the syntenic segment where Solanaceae, coffee tree and grapevine sequences are overlapping (as defined by the arrow on Figure 5) show complete syntenic conservation of eight genes between the coffee tree and Solanaceae (conservation of order and orientation) while two other syntenic genes have undergone an inversion, representing the only major exception to synteny. Here eight extra genes were not found conserved between these two species. While, analyses of the same syntenic segment between coffee and grapevine show the complete conservation of 12 predicted genes in the same order and orientation, only one gene has undergone inversion (g4, Figure 5). Five extra predicted genes were not found conserved between compared segments (Figure 5). These analyses suggest more robust syntenic relationships between the coffee tree and the grapevine than between the coffee tree and Solanaceae at the ovate locus, despite a greater evolutionary distance between coffee and grapevine than between coffee and Solanaceae (Figure 1).
Genetic/physical comparative mapping identifies some degree of macrosynteny among distantly-related species
Macrosynteny generally refers to conserving the linkage of genetic loci among different species. Macrosynteny may be revealed either by comparative genetic mapping of markers or, more recently, by physical mapping of conserved sequences within sequenced reference genomes [38, 39]. Establishing the syntenic relationships among different species offers a valuable tool for understanding their chromosomal evolution and facilitates the transfer of genetic and genome information from a model genome to the species under investigation . This concept has been successfully developed and applied in different plant families such as Solanaceae, Brasicaceae and Poaceae . In grass species, despite the enormous difference in chromosome number and genome size, some genes of agronomic interest were found conserved in shared syntenic blocks between relatively distant species [41, 42]. So far, however, comparative mapping studies have shown that shared macrosynteny has been conserved among species of the same family. More generally, it appears that synteny relationships are more often conserved among closely related species and decline with the increase of phylogenetic distances. In dicotyledonous plants, comparative mapping studies demonstrated the complexity of establishing shared macrosynteny among distant species [19, 43]. The main problems are due to difficulties in uncovering orthologous markers that may be transferable across distant families, the level of genome rearrangements increasing according to the phylogenetic distance between species, and ancestral whole genome duplication that may scramble syntenic relationships. Using bioinformatic approaches, a large set of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) shared between Asterid plant species (including C. canephora and S. lycopersicum) and the model Rosid plant genome A. thaliana has been identified  and used for comparative genetic mapping and chromosomal evolution studies in the Solanaceae [10–13]. Thanks to the intrinsic feature of tagging orthologous single loci, Lefebvre-Pautigny et al. (2009)  further demonstrated that COSII loci can be used for comparative mapping across Rubiaceae (coffee tree) and Solanaceae (tomato, potato...) plant families and that shared synteny was detected among these species. In order to investigate chromosome evolution over large phylogenetic distances and to decipher chromosome evolution between Solanaceae and Rubiaceae with more precision, we assessed the relationships of coffee tree and tomato genomes with grapevine by in silico mapping approaches of genetically mapped COSII sequences. Pairwise comparisons between tomato/grapevine and coffee tree/grapevine brought to light an unsuspected level of shared synteny with the grapevine genome, considering the phylogenetic distances between the Rubiaceae and the Solanaceae on one hand, and between the Rubiaceae and the Vitaceae on the other. These families belong to different clades: Asterids for the Solanaceae and the Rubiaceae and Rosids for the Vitaceae. Both comparisons displayed synteny fragmented into relatively small blocks: 4.4 Mb and 3.9 Mb in average, when grapevine is compared to coffee and tomato, respectively. Several large blocks of shared synteny were also detected covering up to 15 Mb in the grapevine genome or containing up to 14 COSII syntenic markers between coffee and grapevine. Beside phylogenetic distances, this level of conservation is also particularly striking considering the large chromosome number and genome size differences between grapevine (n = 19, 475 Mb) compared to both tomato (n = 12; 965 Mb) and coffee tree (n = 11; 704 Mb). Our in silico mapping analysis supports the absence of recent duplication in the grapevine genome. Whole genome duplications have deep consequences on genome organization. It may promote a more complex genome structure through a high level of chromosome rearrangements, making it difficult to clearly identify syntenic blocks. In previous comparative mapping studies between dicotyledonous species, such as Arabidopsis, potato, sugar beet, sunflower and Prunus, ancestral and conserved syntenic segments were discovered using genetic map based on ESTs . However the duplicated nature of the referential Arabidopsis genome gave a complex picture of the shared macrosynteny [22, 43]. In contrast, the absence of paleo-polyploidy events ever since the divergence of the tomato, coffee and grapevine genomes may explain this particularly stable conservation of the ancestral genome structure, which made it easier to detect ancestral fragments of shared macrosynteny.
Several grapevine chromosomes showed a low level or complete absence of shared synteny when compared to coffee and tomato. The same observation is true with several parts of the coffee LGs that are covered with a low COSII loci number. In this case, the increase of the number of COSII loci, particularly in regions that are less covered, will improve the resolution in detecting the shared synteny between coffee and grapevine. In the near future, the fullysequenced genomes of grapevine, tomato and the forthcoming sequence of the coffee genome promise improvements in detecting synteny, particularly in chromosomal segments which are not covered.
Microsynteny can be conserved in ancestral shared macrosyntenic blocks among tomato, coffee tree and grapevine genomes
In contrast with macrosynteny, significant microsynteny was previously well established between distantly-related dicotyledonous species [44, 45], and recently microsynteny were even detected between the coffee tree and different reference genomes such as the grapevine . However most of the interspecies analysis of the microsynteny reported so far were established without information on macrostructure conservation or with evidence of lack of macrosynteny conservation .
Here, we compared the level of microsynteny in conserved ancestral macrosyntenic blocks at the ovate orthologous loci between grapevine, coffee tree and five Solanaceae species. The ovate locus intervenes in the control of the fruit shape development and has been identified in the tomato, on a BAC clone that has been completely sequenced [31, 33]. Moreover, orthologous BAC clones from four other Solanaceae (potato, eggplant, pepper and petunia) were identified, sequenced and compared at the gene level . A high degree of collinearity was observed between these species that separated from a common ancestor about 27-36 million years--and generations--ago. Using sequence information from the tomato ovate locus we characterized the orthologous segments in the coffee tree and the grapevine and we showed that these orthologous segments belong to ancestral syntenic blocks between tomato Linkage Group 2, coffee Linkage Group G and grapevine chromosome 4. At the gene level, the level of conservation was particularly high considering the relative phylogenetic distances between the species studied. Yet, several isolated disruptions of conservation were noted, such as gene loss, local gene inversion and tandem gene duplication (Figure 5), but similar to previous observations of microsynteny in plants [45, 46]. A remarkable point emerges in our study with a stronger-than-expected level of conservation observed between coffee and grapevine segments. An unexpectedly high level of microsynteny between Fragaria and grapevine compared to a low level of synteny between Fragaria and Arabidopsis was also observed , but this comparison only involved species, although distant, from the Rosid clade. Considering the phylogenetic distance between Solanaceae and Rubiaceae (Asterids) from the Vitaceae family (basal Rosid), we expected a stronger conservation of local microstructure within Solanaceae species and then, between Solanaceae and Rubiaceae. However, the microstructure here is clearly conserved more completely between coffee and grapevine segments than between coffee and the five Solanaceae species analyzed. Five different particular genes were found conserved between coffee and grapevine but completely absent in Solanaceae. Furthermore, an inversion of the transcriptional orientation of two genes was shared in all the Solanaceae segments in relation to the coffee or the grapevine counterparts. All these observations suggest that most of the rearrangements at the ovate locus occurred independently in the Solanaceae and most likely shortly after their divergence with the Rubiaceae family.
To date it is not clear why stronger conservation of microstructure was found between species that are separated by 114-125 million years of independent evolution and whether this conservation can be extended to other loci in coffee and grapevine genomes. However, it is interesting to note that grapevine and coffee trees are both woody plants with a long generational cycle of about four years, while the tomato and the Solanaceae considered in this study are all annual plants. Yet, in terms of generations, coffee/grapevine separation only took place about 28 and 31 million generations ago and this might be one of the reasons of the apparent higher conservation between them. This number is to be compared with the 83-89 million years that separate coffee trees and tomatoes and the same number of generations with respect to the tomato. Although no convincing comparative mapping studies have been conducted to date to test life-history impact on the genome structure, it has been demonstrated that rates of molecular evolution are consistently low in trees and shrubs, with relatively long generation times, as compared with related herbaceous plants, which generally have shorter generation times [47–49]. A comparative genomic sequence analysis of strawberry (Fragaria), a non ligneous but perennial plant, with other rosids  revealed also a high level of synteny with Populus and Vitis, two ligneous species, and an apparent stability of their genomes. Very few studies compared syntenic relationships between annual and perennial plants, a comparison between Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass) and other Poaceae showed a good conservation of synteny and collinearity , but this study concerned herbaceous and monocotyledonous plants within a unique family. Comparative studies between annual and perennial dicotyledonous plants should be conducted to confirm or invalidate our hypothesis about the genome structure conservation among perennial vs. annual plant species.
Large-scale sequence data has enabled the detection of micro-collinear regions in less closely related species without apparent associated macrosynteny [45, 51, 52]. In our study, one of the few that compare distantly related species from the asterid and rosid clades at the genome organization level, we revealed unexpected genome macro-and microstructure conservation.
We have used a large set of genetically mapped COSII loci on coffee tree and tomato and the public release of the grapevine genome to evaluate the synteny relationships between these distantly related genomes from species of agronomic interest. It appears that significant synteny can be detected through numerous small blocks, allowing a first analysis about the divergent chromosomal histories between tomato, coffee trees and grapevine. In addition, based on the observation of the ovate locus, syntenic blocks appear to be associated with an extensive conservation of the microstructure. However, Solanaceae microstructures appear much more different that the conservation between coffee tree and grapevine, suggesting a divergent and specific evolution of the locus in the Solanaceae prior to the separation with the Rubiaceae and that time factor alone does not explain the divergences. From an applied perspective, the detailed analysis of blocks of synteny over these distantly related plant species is certainly of great interest in comparative genomic approaches to identified genes of interest.
bacterial artificial chromosome
basic local alignment search tool
conserved syntenic segment
expressed sequence tag
polymerase chain reaction
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
single nucleotide polymorphism
simple sequence repeats.
The study described in this article was supported by IRD and Nestlé R&D.
- Davis AP, Govaerts R, Bridson DM, Stoffelen P: An annotated taxonomic conspectus of the genus Coffea (Rubiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2006, 152 (4): 465-512. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00584.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wikstrom N, Savolainen V, Chase MW: Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc Biol Sci. 2001, 268 (1482): 2211-2220. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1782.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noirot M, Poncet V, Barre P, Hamon P, Hamon S, de Kochko A: Genome Size Variations in Diploid African Coffea Species. Ann Bot. 2003, 92 (5): 709-714. 10.1093/aob/mcg183.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van der Hoeven R, Ronning C, Giovannoni J, Martin G, Tanksley S: Deductions about the number, organisation, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on the analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic silencing. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 1441-1456. 10.1105/tpc.010478.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinto-Maglio CAF, Da Cruz ND: Pachytene chromosome morphology in Coffea L II. C. arabica L. complement. Caryologia. 1998, 51 (1): 19-35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamon P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Srisuwan S, Robin O, Poncet V, Hamon S, de Kochko A: Physical mapping of rDNA and heterochromatin in chromosomes of 16 Coffea species: A revised view of species differentiation. Chromosom Res. 2009, 17 (3): 291-304. 10.1007/s10577-009-9033-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley SD: Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics. 2006, 174 (3): 1407-1420. 10.1534/genetics.106.062455.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin C, Mueller L, Carthy J, Crouzillat D, Pétiard V, Tanksley S: Coffee and tomato share common gene repertoires as revealed by deep sequencing of seed and cherry transcripts. TAG Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 112 (1): 114-130. 10.1007/s00122-005-0112-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Kochko A, Akaffou S, Andrade AC, Campa C, Crouzillat D, Guyot R, Hamon P, Ming R, Mueller LA, Poncet V: Advances in Coffea Genomics. Advances in Botanical Research Vol 53. Edited by: Delseny M, Kader J. 2010, Academic Press Ltd-Elsevier Science Ltd, 53: 23-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Durrett R, Mazourek M, Jahn MM, Tanksley SD: A COSII genetic map of the pepper genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 118 (7): 1279-1293. 10.1007/s00122-009-0980-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Tanksley SD: A detailed synteny map of the eggplant genome based on conserved ortholog set II (COSII) markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 118 (5): 927-935. 10.1007/s00122-008-0950-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Eannetta N, Xu Y, Plieske J, Ganal M, Pozzi C, Bakaher N, Tanksley S: COSII genetic maps of two diploid Nicotiana species provide a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and insights into chromosome evolution in tetraploid N. tabacum. TAG Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 120 (4): 809-827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Tanksley SD: Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 182-10.1186/1471-2164-11-182.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lefebvre-Pautigny F, Wu F, Philippot M, Rigoreau M, Priyono , Zouine M, Frasse P, Bouzayen M, Broun P, Pétiard V: High resolution synteny maps allowing direct comparisons between the coffee and tomato genomes. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 2010, 6 (4): 565-577. 10.1007/s11295-010-0272-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansen RK, Kaittanis C, Saski C, Lee SB, Tomkins J, Alverson AJ, Daniell H: Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids. BMC Evol Biol. 2006, 6: 32-10.1186/1471-2148-6-32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lodhi MA, Reisch BI: Nuclear DNA content of Vitis; species, cultivars, and other genera of the Vitaceae. TAG Theor Appl Genet. 1995, 90 (1): 11-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis WH: Polyploidy in angiosperms: dicotyledons. Basic Life Sci. 1979, 13: 241-268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C: The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007, 449 (7161): 463-U465. 10.1038/nature06148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung S, Jiwan D, Cho I, Lee T, Abbott A, Sosinski B, Main D: Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 17-10.1186/1471-2164-10-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rong J, Bowers JE, Schulze SR, Waghmare VN, Rogers CJ, Pierce GJ, Zhang H, Estill JC, Paterson AH: Comparative genomics of Gossypium and Arabidopsi s: unraveling the consequences of both ancient and recent polyploidy. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (9): 1198-1210. 10.1101/gr.3907305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salse J, Piegu B, Cooke R, Delseny M: Synteny between Arabidopsis thaliana and rice at the genome level: a tool to identify conservation in the ongoing rice genome sequencing project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (11): 2316-2328. 10.1093/nar/30.11.2316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez I, Graziano E, Gebhardt C, Barakat A, Berry S, Arus P, Delseny M, Barnes S: Plant genome archaeology: evidence for conserved ancestral chromosome segments in dicotyledonous plant species. Plant Biotechnol J. 2003, 1 (2): 91-99. 10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00009.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guyot R, de la Mare M, Viader V, Hamon P, Coriton O, Bustamante-Porras J, Poncet V, Campa C, Hamon S, de Kochko A: Microcollinearity in an ethylene receptor coding gene region of the Coffea canephor genome is extensively conserved with Vitis vinifera and other distant dicotyledonous sequenced genomes. BMC Plant Biology. 2009, 9 (1): 22-10.1186/1471-2229-9-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plechakova O, Tranchant-Dubreuil C, Benedet F, Couderc M, Tinaut A, Viader V, De Block P, Hamon P, Campa C, de Kochko A: MoccaDB - an integrative database for functional, comparative and diversity studies in the Rubiaceae family. BMC Plant Biology. 2009, 9 (1): 123-10.1186/1471-2229-9-123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stam P: Construction of Integrated Genetic-Linkage Maps by Means of a New Computer Package - Joinmap. Plant Journal. 1993, 3 (5): 739-744. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.00739.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW: JoinMap®4.0 software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Edited by: Kyazma BV. 2006, Wageningen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Voorrips RE: MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002, 93 (1): 77-78. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA: Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19 (9): 1639-1645. 10.1101/gr.092759.109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu Q, Guyot R, de Kochko A, Byers A, Navajas-Pérez R, Langston BJ, Dubreuil-Tranchant C, Paterson AH, Poncet V, Nagai C: Micro-collinearity and genome evolution in the vicinity of an ethylene receptor gene of cultivated diploid and allotetraploid coffee species (Coffea). The Plant Journal. 2011, 67 (2): 305-317. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04590.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamon P, Duroy P-O, Dubreuil-Tranchant C, Mafra D'Almeida Costa P, Duret C, Razafinarivo N, Couturon E, Hamon S, de Kochko A, Poncet V: Two novel Ty1-copi retrotransposons isolated from coffee trees can effectively reveal evolutionary relationships in the Coffea genus (Rubiaceae). Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2011, 285 (6): 447-460. 10.1007/s00438-011-0617-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Van Eck J, Cong B, Tanksley SD: A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (20): 13302-13306. 10.1073/pnas.162485999.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsaballa A, Pasentsis K, Darzentas N, Tsaftaris AS: Multiple evidence for the role of an Ovate-like gene in determining fruit shape in pepper. BMC Plant Biology. 2011, 11:Google Scholar
- Ku HM, Vision T, Liu J, Tanksley SD: Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (16): 9121-9126. 10.1073/pnas.160271297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Diehl A, Wu F, Vrebalov J, Giovannoni J, Siepel A, Tanksley SD: Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of a Conserved Syntenic Segment in the Solanaceae. Genetics. 2008, 180 (1): 391-408. 10.1534/genetics.108.087981.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Causier B, Castillo R, Xue Y, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Davies B: Tracing the evolution of the floral homeotic B- and C-function genes through genome synteny. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27 (11): 2651-2664. 10.1093/molbev/msq156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leroy T, Marraccini P, Dufour M, Montagnon C, Lashermes P, Sabau X, Ferreira LP, Jourdan I, Pot D, Andrade AC: Construction and characterization of a Coffea canephora BAC library to study the organization of sucrose biosynthesis genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 111 (6): 1032-1041. 10.1007/s00122-005-0018-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnhammer ELL, Durbin R: A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis (Reprinted from Gene Combis, vol 167, pg GC1-GC10, 1995). Gene. 1995, 167 (1-2): GC1-GC10. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Argout X, Salse J, Aury J-M, Guiltinan MJ, Droc G, Gouzy J, Allegre M, Chaparro C, Legavre T, Maximova SN: The genome of Theobroma cacao. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 101-108. 10.1038/ng.736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, Delcher AL, Jaiswal P, Mockaitis K, Liston A, Mane SP: The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet. 2011, 43 (2): 109-U151. 10.1038/ng.740.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt R: Synteny: recent advances and future prospects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000, 3 (2): 97-102. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00048-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gale MD, Devos KM: Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (5): 1971-1974. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.1971.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F: 'Green revolution' genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature. 1999, 400 (6741): 256-261. 10.1038/22307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gebhardt C, Walkemeier B, Henselewski H, Barakat A, Delseny M, Stuber K: Comparative mapping between potato (Solanum tuberosum) and Arabidopsis thaliana reveals structurally conserved domains and ancient duplications in the potato genome. Plant J. 2003, 34 (4): 529-541. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01747.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deleu W, Gonzalez V, Monfort A, Bendahmane A, Puigdomenech P, Arus P, Garcia-Mas J: Structure of two melon regions reveals high microsynteny with sequenced plant species. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007, 278 (6): 611-622. 10.1007/s00438-007-0277-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kevei Z, Seres A, Kereszt A, Kaló P, Kiss P, Tóth G, Endre G, Kiss G: Significant microsynteny with new evolutionary highlights is detected between Arabidopsis and legume model plants despite the lack of macrosynteny. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2005, 274 (6): 644-657. 10.1007/s00438-005-0057-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh K, Hardeman K, Ivanchenko MG, Ellard-Ivey M, Nebenführ A, White1 T, Lomax TL: Fine mapping in tomato using microsynteny with the Arabidopsis genome: the Diageotropica (Dgt) locus. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (9): 049-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kay KM, Whittall JB, Hodges SA: A survey of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer substitution rates across angiosperms: an approximate molecular clock with life history effects. BMC Evol Biol. 2006, 6: 36-10.1186/1471-2148-6-36.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laroche J, Li P, Maggia L, Bousquet J: Molecular evolution of angiosperm mitochondrial introns and exons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (11): 5722-5727. 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5722.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith SA, Donoghue MJ: Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science. 2008, 322 (5898): 86-89. 10.1126/science.1163197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones ES, Mahoney NL, Hayward MD, Armstead IP, Jones JG, Humphreys MO, King IP, Kishida T, Yamada T, Balfourier Fo: An enhanced molecular marker based genetic map of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) reveals comparative relationships with other Poaceae genomes. Genome. 2002, 45 (2): 282-295. 10.1139/g01-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt R: Plant genome evolution: lessons from comparative genomics at the DNA level. Plant Mol Biol. 2002, 48 (1-2): 21-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timms L, Jimenez R, Chase M, Lavelle D, McHale L, Kozik A, Lai Z, Heesacker A, Knapp S, Rieseberg L: Analyses of synteny between Arabidopsis thaliana and species in the Asteraceae reveal a complex network of small syntenic segments and major chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics. 2006, 173 (4): 2227-2235. 10.1534/genetics.105.049205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar