Genome-wide SNP identification in multiple morphotypes of allohexaploid tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)
© Hand et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 February 2012
Accepted: 15 May 2012
Published: 6 June 2012
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide essential tools for the advancement of research in plant genomics, and the development of SNP resources for many species has been accelerated by the capabilities of second-generation sequencing technologies. The current study aimed to develop and use a novel bioinformatic pipeline to generate a comprehensive collection of SNP markers within the agriculturally important pasture grass tall fescue; an outbreeding allopolyploid species displaying three distinct morphotypes: Continental, Mediterranean and rhizomatous.
A bioinformatic pipeline was developed that successfully identified SNPs within genotypes from distinct tall fescue morphotypes, following the sequencing of 414 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – generated amplicons using 454 GS FLX technology. Equivalent amplicon sets were derived from representative genotypes of each morphotype, including six Continental, five Mediterranean and one rhizomatous. A total of 8,584 and 2,292 SNPs were identified with high confidence within the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes respectively. The success of the bioinformatic approach was demonstrated through validation (at a rate of 70%) of a subset of 141 SNPs using both SNaPshot™ and GoldenGate™ assay chemistries. Furthermore, the quantitative genotyping capability of the GoldenGate™ assay revealed that approximately 30% of the putative SNPs were accessible to co-dominant scoring, despite the hexaploid genome structure. The sub-genome-specific origin of each SNP validated from Continental tall fescue was predicted using a phylogenetic approach based on comparison with orthologous sequences from predicted progenitor species.
Using the appropriate bioinformatic approach, amplicon resequencing based on 454 GS FLX technology is an effective method for the identification of polymorphic SNPs within the genomes of Continental and Mediterranean tall fescue. The GoldenGate™ assay is capable of high-throughput co-dominant SNP allele detection, and minimises the problems associated with SNP genotyping in a polyploid by effectively reducing the complexity to a diploid system. This SNP collection may now be refined and used in applications such as cultivar identification, genetic linkage map construction, genome-wide association studies and genomic selection in tall fescue. The bioinformatic pipeline described here represents an effective general method for SNP discovery within outbreeding allopolyploid species.
KeywordsLolium arundinaceum Molecular marker DNA sequencing Haplotype Sub-genome
The increased scale of data generation and reduction in associated costs characteristic of second-generation sequencing technologies has recently permitted large-scale single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery efforts for crop species that previously had limited genomic resources. SNPs have rapidly become the molecular genetic marker of choice for a range of applications, largely due to their abundance within the genome, co-dominant nature and amenability to high-throughput detection that produces results with low error rates [1–3]. An extensive resource of SNPs distributed throughout the genome will potentially allow the construction of high-density genetic maps, genome wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic selection (GS) to be performed in the targeted species [4, 5]. Although large-scale SNP collections were once confined to the most economically valuable crops such as maize and rice [6–9], reports have now been made for species with traditionally fewer genomic resources including alfalfa , common bean , Amaranth , oat  and sugarcane .
All SNP discovery activities rely on the resequencing of targeted regions from single or multiple genotypes, alignment of the sequence reads and identification of nucleotide variants within and between the genotypes. More specifically, in plant species, this process has generally been accomplished through sequencing of transcriptomes [15, 16], PCR amplicons , gene spaces enriched by various methods  and genomic fractions of reduced complexity obtained using methods such as restriction endonuclease digestion and size fractionation, or enrichment for hypomethylated genomic regions [11, 12, 15–17]. Regardless of the methodology used, the process of SNP discovery is considerably more complicated for allopolyploid species, as interpretation of sequence data is hindered by the presence of multiple, often divergent, sub-genomes. Discrimination must then be performed between the nucleotide variation representing differences between these sub-genomic copies (homoeologous sequence variants [HSVs])  and the homologous allelic variation arising within or between individuals, that is able to be assayed as a polymorphic molecular genetic marker (SNP) . For plants, this process is most challenging in outbreeding species with multiple heterozygous genomic constitutions, for which nucleotide variation within each resident sub-genome further complicates data interpretation. Subsequent SNP genotyping is also more complicated for polyploid as compared to diploid taxa. Quantitative genotyping methods are required to fully classify nucleotide variant dosage and hence verify the genotype at any given locus or homoeolocus .
As an outbreeding allohexaploid (2n = 6x = 42) species, the agronomically important pasture grass tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb. syn. Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.) provides a clear example of complex plant genome architecture. To date, molecular marker development within tall fescue has been restricted to either anonymous marker systems such as amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), laborious sequence-specific systems such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), or more efficient and informative simple sequence repeat (SSR) assays based on analysis of either expressed sequence tag (EST) or genomic DNA sequences [20–22]. More recently, a high-throughput genotyping system designed for Lolium and Festuca species was developed in the form of a Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) array . However, for improvement of tall fescue through GWAS or GS, a collection of SNPs distributed throughout the genome is ultimately desirable.
All molecular genetic marker development performed to date in tall fescue has been focused on the Continental morphotype, which represents only one of three currently recognised eco-geographic races of tall fescue. Continental tall fescue has historically been domesticated into the most commonly cultivated tall fescue varieties, however two other morphotypes (Mediterranean and rhizomatous) have also been recognised. The contemporary species believed to be most closely related to the putative progenitors of Continental tall fescue have been identified as the diploid (2x) taxon meadow fescue (F. pratensis Huds. syn. L. pratense (Huds.) Darbysh.) and a tetraploid form (4x) of tall fescue (F. arundinacea var. glaucescens syn. F. arundinacea subsp. fenas) . Recent advances suggest that Mediterranean tall fescue has evolved independently in Northern Africa following the hybridization of a different set of progenitor species, which have not been identified. Mediterranean tall fescue may hence be better described as a separate taxon from Continental tall fescue . Conversely, current evidence suggests that the rhizomatous and Continental tall fescue morphotypes share the same progenitor species, but have since undergone genomic divergence .
This study aimed to assemble a collection of SNPs distributed throughout the tall fescue genome, based on resequencing amplicons that are predicted to be located at regular intervals across each homoeologous group. Specifically, novel bioinformatic approaches were developed to reduce the complexity of sequence contigs and ultimately to identify SNPs within specific sub-genomes. Given the demonstrated differences between genomic constitutions of Continental and Mediterranean tall fescues, the experimental procedures were applied in parallel to representatives of each group, as well as the rhizomatous morphotype.
Sequencing output for each tall fescue genotype included
No. sequence reads
No. Amplicons sequenced (%)
Average reads per amplicon
Continental tall fescue
Mediterranean tall fescue
Rhizomatous tall fescue
F. arundinacea var. glaucescens
Amplicon design and generation
The amplicons sequenced were selected based upon their likelihood to be evenly distributed throughout the tall fescue genome, as determined by a comparative genome analysis involving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and Brachypodium distachyon. The comparative sequence analysis between both wheat deletion bin-mapped ESTs  (Additional File 2) and perennial ryegrass ESTs  and the B. distachyon 8X genome release  was performed using the BLASTN search tool (best hits retained with e-value < 10-20) . All primers were subsequently designed based on either wheat or perennial ryegrass EST template sequences using Primer3 software , and were intended to amplify regions approximately 500 bp in length.
PCRs were performed in a total volume of 10 μl, and contained 1 x Immolase PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.25 μM each primer, 0.2 units Immolase DNA polymerase (Bioline) and approximately 5 ng of genomic DNA template. Cycling conditions for the perennial ryegrass EST-derived amplicons were as follows: an enzyme activation step of 95°C for 15 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 55°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute and a final extension of 72°C for 7 minutes. Amplicons generated using primers designed from wheat EST sequence template used an alternative annealing temperature of 60°C.
Individual PCR products were purified with the addition of Agencourt AMPure® (Beckman Coulter) solution equivalent to 1.7 x the prior reaction volume. The magnetic beads were subsequently washed, and DNA was eluted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A 30-fold dilution of the purified product was quantified using PicoGreen® (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplicons were subsequently pooled to obtain an approximate equimolar concentration of each amplicon, based on the relative DNA concentration as estimated by PicoGreen® (Life Technologies) and the amplicon length. A separate pool of amplicons was generated for each genotype processed, resulting in a total of 13 pools.
Sequencing library preparation
Pooled amplicons were concentrated using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and 5 μg of each pool was sheared for 65 seconds using the Covaris S2 ultra-sonicator with the duty cycle set to 5%, an intensity of 3, and 200 cycles per burst. Sheared samples were purified using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and 5 μg of each sample was loaded onto a 1% (w/v) agarose-TAE gel and electrophoresed at 100 volts for 90 minutes to allow fragment separation. Fragments 400 to 700 bp in size were excised from the gel and purified using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), followed by further purification with the Agencourt AMPure® (Beckman Coulter) reagent. Unique 8 bp sequence tags were ligated to the fragments of each amplicon pool to allow the genotype origin of each sequence read to be identified following pooling of all amplicons. This process of barcoding was performed as described by a previous study . When tagged samples were pooled, 150 ng of each hexaploid tall fescue genotype was pooled together along with 100 ng of the tetraploid F. arundinacea var. glaucescens genotype.
Following ligation of double stranded GS FLX Titanium A and B adapters (Roche), the library was PCR amplified in a total volume of 30 μl containing 1 x Phusion buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.2 μM each A and B primer, 0.6 units Phusion High-fidelity DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 20 ng input DNA. Cycling conditions included a hot start of 98°C for 30 seconds followed by 15 cycles of 98°C for 10 seconds, 58°C for 20 seconds and 72°C for 60 seconds. Following purification using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit, the amplified library was assessed by loading a 1 μl aliquot on a Agilent Bioanalyzer 1000 DNA chip according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
454 GS FLX sequencing
The amplicon library was clonally amplified by emulsion PCR as described in the emulsion PCR (emPCR) Method Manual Lib-L SV, GS FLX Titanium Series (October 2009, Rev. Jan 2010 [Roche]). The emPCR titration method, as described in the same manual, was used to determine the optimal volume of amplicon library to use for emPCR amplification, such that 10-12% of the capture beads become enriched. A total of 1.58 million enriched capture beads were deposited on two regions of a four-region gasket and sequenced using the GS FLX Titanium instrument (Roche). Sequence reads were subjected to run-time data processing according to default parameters defined within the GS FLX Titanium processor. Only sequence reads that passed this quality filter were accessible for analysis.
The set of amplicons obtained from diploid meadow fescue accession Bf1199 were purified and directly sequenced using dideoxynucleotide chain termination (Sanger) chemistry as described previously .
Sequence assembly and SNP identification
Sequence reads were initially sorted by barcode, and then the barcode and adaptor sequences were trimmed from each read using NextGENE software (Softgenetics). Amplicon coverage was estimated for each genotype using a BLASTN search  to query the sequence reads with the perennial ryegrass and wheat EST template sequences using an e-value threshold of 0.001. Sequence reads from tall fescue cultivars Jesup, Prosper and Torpedo were assembled de novo using the MIRA assembly software . Assembly parameters were stringently designed to assemble contigs representing sub-genomes within the allohexaploid genome. Required percentage was set to 97%, with a minimum of 100 overlapping base pairs required. A minimum of 5 reads were required per contig, and singletons were saved. Reads from the tetraploid F. arundinacea var. glaucescens genotype were also assembled de novo using the same parameters with the exception of minimum reads per contig, which was reduced to 2 in consideration of the lower number of reads generated for this species. The amplicon origin of each contig was determined by mapping of their consensus sequence to the meadow fescue genome-derived amplicon sequences using MIRA software at a lower stringency of 80% percentage required, in order to co-assemble each putative sub-genome consensus. Those contigs with no match to a meadow fescue template sequence were further mapped to the perennial ryegrass and wheat ESTs originally used as template for primer design.
NextGENE software (Softgenetics) was used to align all other sequence reads to the reference contig assembly of the appropriate morphotype. Each genotype was assembled separately with a matching requirement of greater than 50 bp overlap at 80% identity or more specified. All nucleotide variants within each contig were recorded in the generated SNP report. Assembly of putative sub-genome consensus sequences to identify putative HSVs and diagnostic SNPs was performed using the mapping component of MIRA software  with the percentage required set to 80% and a minimum of 10 overlapping base pairs required. Nucleotide positions identified as containing HSVs were subsequently removed from the SNP reports prior to any calculations of SNP numbers. Nucleotide variants were identified as putative SNPs when they were present in greater than one genotype (but not all genotypes) and showed no co-location with putative HSVs. No indels were considered as putative SNPs.
SNP validation using SNaPshot™ chemistry
Putative SNPs were chosen for validation when they were positioned within the middle of a contig (in order to avoid variants arising from misalignment at the termini of each contig). Interrogation primers were designed adjacent to each variant base to enable implementation of the SNaPshot™ assay (Life Technologies). Loci containing the SNP of interest were initially amplified using PCR as described previously and purified with the addition of Exonuclease I and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP). The SNaPshot™ reaction was performed in a total volume of 5 μl which contained 1 μl of SNaPshot™ Reaction Mix, 0.1 μM interrogation primer, and 1 μl of purified PCR product as template, and was subjected to cycling conditions as described in the associated manual. Each fluorochrome-labelled extension product was purified with the addition of SAP, and subsequently diluted 8-fold with H2O. A total of 2 μl of this dilution was combined with 8.95 μl of Hi-Di™ formamide (Life Technologies) and 0.05 μl of GeneScan™ 120 LIZ® Size Standard (Life Technologies) and genotyping was performed using the ABI3730xl capillary electrophoresis platform (Life Technologies). Analysis was completed using GeneMapper Software version 3.7 (Life Technologies).
SNP validation using GoldenGate™ chemistry
The GoldenGate™ assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol and used the Illumina universal bead-chip which was scanned by the iScan system, following the manufacturer’s directions. Allele calling was performed using GenomeStudio v2011.1 (Illumina). This software calculates the intensity of the Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence, where the two fluorochromes represent the two alleles, and uses the Cy3/Cy5 ratio to determine the genotype of each individual at a particular locus. Those SNPs identified as polymorphic were categorized based on their observed clustering behaviour. As a measure of SNP performance, the generated allele calls were compared to those obtained using SNaPshot™ chemistry. This comparison considered differences created by the co-dominant genotyping capacity of the GoldenGate™ chemistry and did not consider missing data.
SNP scores from the SNaPshot™ validation assay were used to estimate the genetic similarity of the tall fescue genotypes within the validation panel. The alleles were converted to a binary scoring system for each SNP locus and the Dice  coefficient was used to generate a similarity matrix in the program DARwin 5.0.158 . A phenogram was constructed from the genetic distances by the unweighted group method of arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The genetic relationships were compared to those generated using 302 alleles scored from 28 SSR markers. SSR allele data was available for the genotypes within the SNP validation panel following an earlier study .
Sequence reads derived from Continental tall fescue cv. Jesup, meadow fescue and F. arundinacea var. glaucescens were aligned using Sequencher 4.7 (Gene Codes) for each amplicon, and contigs were trimmed to make each read equal length. Neighbour-joining trees were constructed using MEGA version 4  with the maximum composite likelihood nucleotide substitution model.
Design of amplicons from genome-wide distributed genomic loci
Genomic regions predicted to be conserved between members of the Pooideae subfamily were initially determined through comparison of the chromosomal locations of wheat deletion bin-mapped ESTs with their putative orthologues in the genome of the model sequenced model grass, B. distachyon. A total of 19 blocks of conserved synteny between the wheat and B. distachyon genomes were recorded (Additional Files 3 and 4), and it was inferred that these genomic regions are also likely to be conserved between perennial ryegrass and B. distachyon. Perennial ryegrass ESTs were subsequently used to query the B. distachyon genome draft in order to identify loci that are likely to be physically located within the previously defined macrosyntenic blocks. A total of 668 genomic loci were used for primer design to generate amplicons, of which 321 successfully amplified a single product within hexaploid tall fescue. An additional 93 primer pairs designed directly from wheat EST template proved to also successfully amplify single products from tall fescue, resulting in a total of 414 amplicons selected for 454 GS FLX sequencing. The predicted distribution of these 414 amplicons is given in Additional File 5.
Sequencing and reference contig assembly
454 GS FLX sequencing from two regions of a four-region gasket produced 379,060 sequence reads that passed the run-time quality filter. Sequencing output was variable across sequenced genotypes, with a maximum of 52,711 (PI 287820) and minimum of 3,231 (Resolute) sequence reads achieved per genotype (Table 1). This variability is likely to be associated with differences in efficiency of each individual barcode ligation reaction. A comprehensive coverage of the amplicon set was achieved for each genotype (84-97% coverage) with the sequencing depth for each amplicon ranging from 9 to 146 sequence reads per genotype, and reflecting the variability of the sequencing output (Table 1). Sequence reads from all genotypes were submitted to the short read archive in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and were assigned the accession number SRA052217. Sanger sequencing of the amplicon set from meadow fescue produced single reads with no overlapping double peaks for 253 (61%) of the amplicons. The remainder either failed to be amplified from the meadow fescue genotype, or, when sequenced, produced mixed reads indicative of multiple product amplification.
Characteristics of the continental tall fescue (Jesup) and mediterranean tall fescue (Prosper) de novo reference assemblies
Number of contigs
Average contig length (bp)
Average reads per contig
Average contigs per amplicon
Average HSVs per amplicon
1 HSV every 109 bp
1 HSV every 122 bp.
Sequence alignment and SNP discovery
Using the Jesup and Prosper putative sub-genome consensus sequences as references for the Continental and Mediterranean tall fescue genotypes respectively, sequence reads from the remaining genotypes were aligned, with the aim of detecting SNPs within sub-genomes of each individual genotype. The number of contigs within the Continental reference sequence that were covered by the remaining genotypes ranged from 70% (Quantum) to 97% (PI 287820), while the degree of coverage of the Mediterranean reference varied from 60% (Resolute) to 97% (PI 598932). A file listing only unique SNP positions was compiled based upon the generated SNP reports from each genotype. SNPs within each contig that co-located with the previously identified putative HSVs were removed from the list.
Summary of polymorphic SNPs predicted within each tall fescue morphotype and diagnostic SNPs identified between morphotypes
Number of SNPs
Number of indels
Number of SNPs(in >1 genotype)
Average SNPs per sub-genome contig
Average SNPs per amplicon
Nucleotide variants capable of diagnostic differentiation between the Continental and Mediterranean tall fescue morphotypes were also predicted using the Jesup and Prosper-derived putative sub-genome consensus sequences (Table 3). Those variants detected between the two reference sets that further appeared to be monomorphic within the sequenced genotypes were tentatively classified as diagnostic in nature. A total of 3,004 of such sequence variants were identified between the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes, while 1,481 were potentially able to differentiate Continental and rhizomatous tall fescue germplasm.
SNP validation using SNaPshot™ chemistry
A total of 96 putative SNPs (from 81 different amplicons) chosen for validation using SNaPshot™ chemistry were predicted to be polymorphic within either the Continental (59) or Mediterranean (19) morphotypes. The remainder were predicted to be diagnostic nucleotide variants capable of discrimination between the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes (9) or the Continental and rhizomatous morphotypes (9).
Results of SNP validation using SNaPshot™ and GoldenGate™ chemistries including a comparison of the genotype calls
SNP class and sub-class (GoldenGate clustering)
Number of SNPs
% genotypes with concordant allele calls
Compared between genotyping systems1
3 clusters (1 sub-genome amplified)
3 clusters (3 sub-genomes amplified)
SNP validation using GoldenGate™ chemistry
A collection of 96 SNPs (from 81 different amplicons) was used to test the efficiency of SNP genotyping in tall fescue using Illumina GoldenGate™ chemistry. The SNPs selected were predicted to be polymorphic within either the Continental (58) or Mediterranean (22) morphotypes. The remainder were again predicted to be diagnostic between the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes (6) or the Continental and rhizomatous morphotypes (10). Of these 96 SNPs, 45 were previously included in the SNaPshot™ validation experiment.
SNP genotyping using the Illumina GoldenGate™ assay was performed with the aim of further validation, while also determining the capacity for quantitative genotyping in hexaploid tall fescue. Of the 96 loci assayed, polymorphic clustering was observed among the included genotypes for 62 (Table 4), which were therefore defined as validated and of high quality. No predicted diagnostic variants were validated using GoldenGate™ chemistry, nonetheless, 3 loci predicted as polymorphic SNPs within either the Continental or Mediterranean morphotypes were ultimately identified as diagnostic for morphotype in the validation panel. Inclusion of genotypes from all three morphotypes also allowed a cross-comparative analysis of the SNP performance in each morphotype. A greater proportion of putative SNPs were validated when assayed from the morphotype from which they originated, however, some level (45 – 48%) of cross-transfer between the Continental and Mediterranean tall fescue morphotypes was observed. Details of the GoldenGate™ assay and the resulting allele calls are supplied in Additional Files 6 and 8.
A comparison of the allele calls generated using the SNaPshot™ and GoldenGate™ chemistries could be performed for 51 SNPs across 44 genotypes (Table 4). In total, an average of 76% of genotypes yielded identical allele calls from both genotyping chemistries, although variability was observed, relating to the performance of the SNP in the GoldenGate™ assay. The highest degree of concordance was achieved when the SNP was either diagnostic (97.67%), or formed three distinct clusters (86.00 – 87.01%). Conversely, the largest amount of discordance was observed for SNPs identified as monomorphic within the GoldenGate™ assay (39.11%).
Assessment of SNP-based genetic diversity
Attribution of SNPs to tall fescue sub-genomes
In order to improve rates of genetic gain in plant breeding, a large number of SNPs are required for GWAS or GS approaches in crop species, particularly for those with a limited extent of linkage disequilibrium . A further requirement for such studies is that SNP loci are regularly distributed throughout the whole genome. For allopolyploid species, this requirement extends to the presence of SNPs within each resident sub-genome, in addition to locations along each chromosome. The objective of the present study was to develop and implement a novel bioinformatic pipeline to enable identification of SNPs within amplicons distributed throughout the allohexaploid tall fescue genome, and more specifically, to predict and validate the SNPs within each of the three sub-genomes.
Comparative genomics for genome-wide SNP locus coverage
For tall fescue, which remains a poorly characterised species with respect to available genomic resources, the targeting of genome-wide distributed regions for resequencing is best achieved using a comparative genomics approach. The methods used here, employing wheat and perennial ryegrass ESTs and the complete B. distachyon genome sequence, rely upon the known macrosynteny between the Triticeae cereals, Poeae grasses (including perennial ryegrass) and B. distachyon[29, 38–40]. While hexaploid tall fescue itself has not been the subject of any studies of synteny within the grasses, it can be assumed with a reasonable level of confidence, that the blocks of synteny observed in this study will also be conserved within tall fescue. Conserved genome co-linearity has been reported, at the genetic map level, between perennial ryegrass and meadow fescue  and is therefore likely to also exist between perennial ryegrass and hexaploid tall fescue, given that meadow fescue is a diploid progenitor species of at least the Continental morphotype of tall fescue [24, 25]. Less certainty exists, however, for the conservation of these synteny blocks within Mediterranean hexaploid tall fescue, given its less characterised genomic constitution . Although the precise location of the sequenced regions within the hexaploid tall fescue genome (of either morphotype) may only be determined through genetic or physical mapping in the future, the prior comparative genomics analysis has at least increased the probability that the discovered SNPs are distributed throughout the genome.
Prediction of sub-genome specific SNPs
The SNP discovery approach taken in this study exploited the higher prevalence of HSVs as compared to SNPs within the tall fescue genome, and by hence assembling sequence reads at an elevated stringency, has generated contigs representative of putative individual sub-genomes. This process aimed to reduce the haplotype complexity within contigs to a level comparable to SNP discovery within an outbreeding diploid species . For hexaploid tall fescue, presence of HSVs would ideally allow each amplicon to be resolved into three contigs representing each sub-genome. However, in practice, from one to as many as nine contigs per amplicon were observed. Observation of fewer than three contigs per amplicon probably indicates either an insufficient number of HSVs present within the sequenced region to decompose the contigs into individual haplotypes, or substantial divergence between sub-genomes in the primer binding sites, such that not all sub-genomes were initially amplified. The presence of greater than three haplotypes is compatible with a number of explanations, the first being that multiple paralogous gene copies were the targets of amplification and sequencing. This hypothesis is supported by sequencing data from the diploid meadow fescue, for which 64 amplicons displayed evidence of the presence of paralogues. Another possible explanation is that sequencing error was responsible for introducing sequence variants capable of generating additional contigs, particularly given the reputation of 454 sequencing for introducing homopolymer indel-like errors . Also, if a sufficient number of allelic SNPs were present within a particular sequenced region, this variation may have been responsible for generating more than three contigs per amplicon. Finally, as the amplicon set was sheared prior to sequencing, multiple contigs per amplicon were also formed as a result of gaps within the alignment, for which 454 reads failed to cover the length of the amplicon. This occurrence would be reduced if sequencing depth was increased per amplicon. As a consequence of all these factors, it is unlikely that the implemented approach has succeeded in generating contigs consistently representing only each resident sub-genome. However, alignment at an elevated stringency achieved useful reduction of haplotype complexity and increased the probability of identifying genuine polymorphic SNPs .
The number of studies detailing SNP discovery for other allopolyploid species using next-generation sequencing data is increasing, but is still currently limited. The process of SNP-HSV discrimination  is simplified in homozygous polyploid species such as self-pollinating wheat  and oat  and species capable of generation of double haploid lines, including canola . In these instances, any intra-genomic variation can be assumed to represent the presence of HSVs. Bundock et al. (2009)  used minor allele frequencies (MAFs) to select probable allelic SNPs when 454 technology was used to sequence amplicons from sugarcane, a highly heterozygous heteropolyploid species. While the use of MAFs for SNP prediction is also possible for tall fescue, the approach ultimately used here has the advantage of generating sub-genome-specific template sequences which can be used for the design of highly multiplexed SNP assays such as Illumina GoldenGate™. A similar approach to that described here, based upon the reduction of haplotype complexity through the separate assembly of homoeologs, has recently been reported in allotetraploid cotton . In this instance, a sub-genome of origin was able to be attributed to many SNPs and consequently, upon linkage mapping, to the cotton homoeologous groups, demonstrating the success of this SNP discovery approach.
It was anticipated that a large collection of SNPs would be identified between the tall fescue genotypes used in this study, given this is a highly heterozygous species, a consequence of an obligate outbreeding reproductive habit. Furthermore, use of multiple genotypes for the SNP discovery process is likely to yield a larger number than if only two genotypes were used, as is commonly the case when parents of mapping populations are used as template in SNP discovery studies [10, 14, 44]. Through inclusion of both cultivar and non-domesticated material in the discovery panel for both tall fescue morphotypes, it was anticipated that predicted SNPs will have an enhanced likelihood of utility in breeding applications. This is an important consideration, as inclusion of the target germplasm in the discovery panel will probably ensure that derived SNPs will be transferable, polymorphic and informative in subsequent applications.
The strategy of reducing haplotype complexity prior to SNP discovery was successful for the identification of polymorphic SNPs, as initially revealed by validation using SNaPshot™ chemistry and subsequently with the GoldenGate™ assay. The predicted SNPs were first tested for polymorphism across a diverse panel of tall fescue genotypes to determine whether conserved HSVs were inadvertently selected. As HSVs represent variation within the tall fescue genome that originates from initial polyploidization events, such variation is likely to be conserved across tall fescue germplasm. Failure to successfully decompose haplotypes within other polyploid species has led to false prediction of SNPs and low validation rates [19, 46]. The proportion of polymorphic SNPs identified here (70%, as an average across both validation experiments), however, suggests that genuine allelic variants have indeed been identified. This rate of validation is comparable to that observed in diploid species, which ranges from 59 to 97% in selected studies [12, 16, 41, 47, 48]. An interesting result of the validation exercise is the extent of cross-transferability of the SNPs between tall fescue morphotypes. The results from both validation experiments suggest that SNPs may be transferable between morphotypes, however with a success rate of less than 50%. Because of the probable taxonomic distinction between the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes, common SNPs between the two groups may be more properly regarded as orthologous sequence variants which happen to exhibit, in these instances, complementary allelic variation. Such inter-specific SNP transferability is a relatively under-studied topic in plants, although the current results are consistent with SNP transfer rates observed within the Eucalyptus genus for which a decrease in validation rate from c. 80% to 50% was observed when SNPs were assayed from species derived of a different sub-genus . Although a limited level of cross-transfer was observed between tall fescue morphotypes, the result justified the strategy of generating sequence from both morphotypes, rather than relying on the successful inter-morphotype transfer.
Nucleotide variants that were monomorphic within, but polymorphic between morphotypes presumably also correspond to a sub-class of orthologous sequence variants. Although, the identification of such diagnostic features revealed limited success, as during validation, only 4 of 34 tested (12%) proved to be diagnostic within the validation panel. The approach used here probably underestimated the diversity within each morphotype by using the consensus of each putative sub-genome contig for SNP prediction. The number and frequency of SNPs within each tall fescue morphotype is therefore likely to be larger than was originally predicted. The validation process did, however, inadvertently identify a further 5 nucleotide variants capable of differentiation between either the Continental and Mediterranean or Continental and rhizomatous morphotypes, demonstrating the need to evaluate assays across diverse germplasm before implementation as either a polymorphic or diagnostic marker.
Alternatively, haplotypes based on multiple SNP alleles are likely to be an effective means for discrimination of morphotypes, as shown by the SNP-based phenogram, which was able to provide resolution comparable with the phenogram constructed using SSR-derived data. The level of concordance between the two phenograms also demonstrates the utility of these SNPs. Although both depict similar genetic relationships within the validation panel, the 302 SSR alleles provided greater resolution, particularly within the Continental accessions. As SNPs are generally only biallelic in nature, it has been estimated that c. 1,000 SNP loci are required to achieve the same level of resolution in diversity studies as that attained by c. 100 SSRs . For the purpose of SNP-based diagnostics in tall fescue, therefore, it may be more reliable to use nucleotide variants identified previously in conserved regions of the chloroplast DNA-derived gene matK and the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA, as implemented in a previous study .
This study has also demonstrated the quantitative genotyping capabilities of the GoldenGate™ assay for an outbreeding hexaploid species. The potential of this assay for allohexaploid species has been previously explored in wheat , but as homozygous individuals were used, only two genotype clusters for a locus-specific assay were ever expected in that particular study. The results presented here represent the first time, to our knowledge, that the GoldenGate™ assay has successfully been used for co-dominant genotyping of SNP loci in an outbreeding hexaploid. These results demonstrate that SNP genotyping is most effective in those instances in which a polymorphism is present in a single sub-genome and no polymorphism is present at the corresponding loci on the homoeologous chromosomes. In these instances, three possible genotypes may arise (i.e. AAAAAA, ABAAAA and BBAAAA) and from some SNP loci, the assay has proven sensitive enough to distinguish each class based on nucleotide variant dosage. An even less complicated scenario has also been achieved in which only the SNP-containing sub-genome appears to be amplified, such that the genotyping assay effectively scores a diploid constitution (i.e. AA, AB, BB). It seems probable that this scenario was made possible by provision of putative sub-genome specific templates to Illumina for primer design. This equivalent approach of complexity reduction by amplification from a single sub-genome has been reported on a smaller scale in bread wheat [52, 53]. However, the combination of the bioinformatic SNP discovery process used here, and the Illumina GoldenGate™ assay has demonstrated that this outcome can also be achieved in a high-throughput manner.
Differences between the two genotyping chemistries utilised in this work were demonstrated by the comparison of allele calls for 51 different SNP loci. As each chemistry utilises different primer sequences for SNP locus amplification, it is understandable that some degree of discordance would be observed. For example, SNPs observed as monomorphic within the GoldenGate™ assay were frequently classed as polymorphic when assayed using SNaPshot chemistry. In this instance, it is possible that the primer sequences designed by Illumina failed to target the relevant sequence variant, which may be a disadvantageous consequence of supplying putative sub-genome specific sequence templates for primer design. The clarity of the clusters formed in the GoldenGate™ assay also influenced the concordance of allele calls and hence the reliability of the SNP. Clustering was more diffuse for some SNPs which may reflect a more complicated amplification scenario, in which dosage-based allele discrimination was less successful. In these instances, allele calling was not as reliable, resulting in the lower level of concordance between the two genotyping chemistries. In summary, based on this comparison, the most reliable and useful SNPs appear to be those which either form three distinct clusters or are diagnostic for specific morphotypes.
It also appears in some instances, that the same nucleotide polymorphism may be present at the same homeoloci across multiple sub-genomes, a scenario leading to more than three clear genotype calls. Despite this complexity, data analysis permitted full genotypic resolution, as was the case for two SNP loci, when five clusters were identified, corresponding to polymorphism in either or both of two sub-genomes (i.e. AAAAAA, AAABAA, AABBAA, ABBBAA, BBBBAA). Alternatively, the generation of this number of clusters may be due to primer binding to a polymorphic region, causing non-uniform clustering of the included genotypes.
Attribution of SNPs to sub-genomes
An advantageous consequence of identifying SNPs within individual sub-genomes of an allopolyploid, is the ability to then attribute each locus to the resident sub-genome of origin. In other polyploid species, this outcome has been achieved either through the use of characterised aneuploid (such as nullisomic-tetrasomic substitution) lines (wheat) [18, 54] or by comparison of the generated sequence with that obtained from the diploid progenitor species, if the identities of these taxa are known (as for white clover and cotton) [45, 55, 56]. Unlike for wheat, substitution lines are not yet readily available for tall fescue. Consequently, assignment of sequence haplotypes to individual sub-genomes can be attempted based on sequence from diploid progenitors, but only to a limited extent. As a hexaploid species, the identity of at least two diploid progenitor species would be required for complete haplotype assignment in tall fescue. Contemporary meadow fescue can fulfil the role as one diploid progenitor, but the two diploid species that hybridised to generate modern day allotetraploid F. arundinacea var. glaucescens have not as yet been identified . Phylogenetic inferences in this study have therefore been able to only assign validated SNPs with confidence to the P (meadow fescue-related) sub-genome. Nevertheless, the results have indicated a clear bias of validated SNPs towards origin from the P genome compared to the G1 or G2 sub-genomes. This result may be a consequence of preferential amplification from this sub-genome when the amplicon libraries were made, given that the majority of primers used were designed from perennial ryegrass genome template sequence, which is likely to have a higher identity to the P sub-genome than either the G1 or G2 sub-genomes . Alternatively, the larger proportion of P sub-genome-specific SNPs may represent a genuine biological phenomenon of higher polymorphism within this sub-genome.
Although sequences flanking a number of SNP loci clearly showed a higher affinity to the F. arundinacea var. glaucescens derived sequence, the identification of each haplotype as derived from either the G1 or G2 sub-genomes cannot consistently be confirmed. For the validated SNPs examined here, only 2 contigs contained multiple F. arundinacea var. glaucescens haplotypes, assumed to be representative of both sub-genomes. The deficit of multiple haplotypes derived from the G sub-genomes is possibly a result of obtaining an insufficient number of 454 reads for the F. arundinacea var. glaucescens amplicons, as previous work has demonstrated that sufficient sequence variation exists between the G1 and G2 sub-genomes for differentiation . Given these current limitations in the identification of sub-genome-specific haplotypes, validated SNPs could instead be assigned to locations on a tall fescue genetic linkage map to enhance understanding of their sub-genome of origin. For this purpose, future work could involve the development of a mapping population, generated using two of the genotypes within the SNP discovery panel as parents.
The collection of SNPs developed in this work is likely to prove useful for applications such as cultivar identification and discrimination, genetic linkage map construction and could also be implemented as part of any future GWAS and GS based molecular breeding approaches in tall fescue. However, while this work represents a substantial advancement in SNP development for tall fescue, a much higher marker density is anticipated to be required for both GWAS and GS applications. Given the obligate outbreeding habit of this species, the predicted degree of linkage disequilibrium is likely to require a higher marker density for GWAS or GS in tall fescue compared to inbreeding species such as barley or rice [5, 57]. In order to generate a larger number of SNP markers at a higher density throughout the tall fescue genome, alternative high-throughput SNP discovery approaches such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS) could be performed. Unlike amplicon sequencing, the various current methods for GBS are not restricted by a need for prior sequence knowledge to support primer design, and can potentially generate hundreds of thousands of marker loci [58, 59]. It is likely that such alternative SNP discovery approaches will be necessary to ultimately permit GWAS and GS breeding strategies in tall fescue. However, regardless of the methodology used for SNP discovery in tall fescue, the haplotype complexities created by the allohexaploid genome structure will still need to be addressed, and the approach taken in this study is applicable to data from multiple sequencing methodologies.
This study has described the development of a bioinformatic pipeline which was used to generate a collection of SNP markers that are likely to be distributed throughout the genome of tall fescue. SNP resources were developed for both of the major tall fescue morphotypes (Continental and Mediterranean). Based on validation data, it can be predicted that of the 8,584 and 2,292 high-confidence SNPs identified for the Continental and Mediterranean morphotypes respectively, approximately two-thirds will be polymorphic and informative, while approximately one-third will be capable of co-dominant scoring using the GoldenGate™ assay. In order to implement such SNPs for tall fescue molecular breeding, the next immediate action would be to refine the collection such that only polymorphic, co-dominant scoreable SNPs are present in a customised GoldenGate™ panel. This finalised SNP collection could then be used to genotype tall fescue individuals in effectively the same manner as would be performed for a diploid species, mitigating the difficulties associated with SNP genotyping in an allohexaploid system. Such a collection of SNPs distributed throughout the genome would be useful for numerous applications, including cultivar identification and discrimination, genetic linkage map construction, and would provide at least a starting point for the implementation of GWAS and GS in breeding of each tall fescue morphotype.
The authors thank Dr. Matthew Hayden for providing primers designed from wheat EST template, as well as Dr. Allison Pearson and Aleixandria McGearey for primer design. The research reported here was funded by the Victorian Department of Primary Industries and the Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre. Melanie Hand was the recipient of an Australian Postgraduate Award. The authors thank Prof. German Spangenberg for careful critical reading of the manuscript.
- Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D: SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Curr Protoc in Hum Genet. 2009, 60: 2.12.11-12.12.18.Google Scholar
- Oliphant A, Barker DL, Stuelpnagel J, Chee M: BeadArray technology: enabling an accurate, cost-effective approach to highthroughput genotyping. Biotechniques Supplement. 2002, 5: 6-58.Google Scholar
- Steemers FJ, Chang W, Lee G, Barker DL, Shen R, Gunderson KL: Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat Methods. 2006, 3: 31-33. 10.1038/nmeth842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jannink J-L, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H: Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct Genomics. 2010, 9: 166-177. 10.1093/bfgp/elq001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cockram J, White J, Zuluaga DL, Smith D, Comadran J, Macaulay M, Luo Z, Kearsey MJ, Werner P, Harrap D: Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 21611-21616. 10.1073/pnas.1010179107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feltus FA, Wan J, Schulze SR, Estill JC, Jiang N, Paterson AH: An SNP resource for rice genetics and breeding based on subspecies Indica and Japonica genome alignments. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1812-1819. 10.1101/gr.2479404.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasu S, Suzuki J, Ohta R, Hasegawa K, Yui R, Kitazawa N, Monna L, Minobe Y: Search for and analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in rice (Oryza sativa, Oryza rufipogon) and establishment of SNP markers. DNA Res. 2002, 9: 163-171. 10.1093/dnares/9.5.163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ching A, Caldwell K, Jung M, Dolan M, Smith O, Tingey S, Morgante M, Rafalski A: SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genet. 2002, 3: 19-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tenaillon MI, Sawkins MC, Long AD, Gaut RL, Doebley JF, Gaut BS: Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 9161-9166. 10.1073/pnas.151244298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han Y, Kang Y, Torres-Jerez I, Cheung F, Town C, Zhao P, Udvardi M, Monteros M: Genome-wide SNP discovery in tetraploid alfalfa using 454 sequencing and high resolution melting analysis. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 350-10.1186/1471-2164-12-350.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyten D, Song Q, Fickus E, Quigley C, Lim J-S, Choi I-Y, Hwang E-Y, Pastor-Corrales M, Cregan P: High-throughput SNP discovery and assay development in common bean. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 475-10.1186/1471-2164-11-475.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maughan PJ, Yourstone SM, Jellen EN, Udall JA: SNP discovery via genomic reduction, barcoding, and 454-pyrosequencing in Amaranth. The Plant Genome. 2009, 2: 260-270. 10.3835/plantgenome2009.08.0022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliver R, Lazo G, Lutz J, Rubenfield M, Tinker N, Anderson J, Wisniewski Morehead N, Adhikary D, Jellen E, Maughan PJ: Model SNP development for complex genomes based on hexaploid oat using high-throughput 454 sequencing technology. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 77-10.1186/1471-2164-12-77.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bundock PC, Elliot FG, Ablett G, Benson AD, Casu RE, Aitken KS, Henry RJ: Targeted single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in a highly polyploid plant species using 454 sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009, 7: 347-354. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00401.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gore MA, Wright MH, Ersoz ES, Bouffard P, Szekeres ES, Jarvie TP, Hurwitz BL, Narechania A, Harkins TT, Grills GS: Large-scale discovery of gene-enriched SNPs. The Plant Genome. 2009, 2: 121-133. 10.3835/plantgenome2009.01.0002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyten D, Cannon S, Song Q, Weeks N, Fickus E, Shoemaker R, Specht J, Farmer A, May G, Cregan P: High-throughput SNP discovery through deep resequencing of a reduced representation library to anchor and orient scaffolds in the soybean whole genome sequence. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 38-10.1186/1471-2164-11-38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Ren C, Joshi T, Vuong T, Xu D, Nguyen H: SNP discovery by high-throughput sequencing in soybean. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 469-10.1186/1471-2164-11-469.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somers DJ, Kirkpatrick R, Moniwa M, Walsh A: Mining single-nucleotide polymorphisms from hexaploid wheat ESTs. Genome. 2003, 46: 431-437. 10.1139/g03-027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaur S, Francki MG, Forster JW: Identification, characterization and interpretation of single-nucleotide sequence variation in allopolyploid crop species. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012, 10: 125-138. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00644.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu WW, Sleper DA, Chao S: Genome mapping of polyploid tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) with RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1995, 91: 947-955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saha M, Mian MAR, Zwonitzer J, Chekhovskiy K, Hopkins A: An SSR- and AFLP-based genetic linkage map of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 110: 323-336. 10.1007/s00122-004-1843-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saha M, Cooper J, Mian MAR, Chekhovskiy K, May G: Tall fescue genomic SSR markers: development and transferability across multiple grass species. Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 113: 1449-1458. 10.1007/s00122-006-0391-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kopecký D, Bartoš J, Lukaszewski A, Baird J, Černoch V, Kolliker R, Rognli OA, Blois H, Caig V, Lübberstedt T: Development and mapping of DArT markers within the Festuca - Lolium complex. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 473-10.1186/1471-2164-10-473.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Humphreys MW, Thomas HM, Morgan WG, Meredith MR, Harper JA, Thomas H, Zwierzykowski Z, Ghesquiere M: Discriminating the ancestral progenitors of hexaploid Festuca arundinacea using genomic in situ hybridization. Heredity. 1995, 75: 171-174. 10.1038/hdy.1995.120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hand ML, Cogan NOI, Stewart AV, Forster JW: Evolutionary history of tall fescue morphotypes inferred from molecular phylogenetics of the Lolium-Festuca species complex. BMC Evol Biol. 2010, 10: 303-10.1186/1471-2148-10-303.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hand M, Cogan N, Forster J: Molecular characterisation and interpretation of genetic diversity within globally distributed germplasm collections of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and meadow fescue (F. pratensis Huds.). Theor Appl Genet. 2012, 124: 1127-1137. 10.1007/s00122-011-1774-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi LL, Echalier B, Chao S, Lazo GR, Butler GE, Anderson OD, Akhunov ED, Dvorak J, Linkiewicz AM, Ratnasiri A: A chromosome bin Map of 16,000 expressed sequence tag loci and distribution of genes among the three genomes of polyploid wheat. Genetics. 2004, 168: 701-712. 10.1534/genetics.104.034868.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawbridge T, Ong E-K, Binnion C, Emmerling M, McInnes R, Meath K, Nguyen N, Nunan K, O'Neill M, O'Toole F: Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenneL.). Plant Sci. 2003, 165: 1089-1100. 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00304-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vogel JP, Garvin DF, Mockler TC, Schmutz J, Rokhsar D, Bevan M: Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature. 2010, 463: 763-768. 10.1038/nature08747.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. 2000, Methods in Molecular Biology, Edited by Krawetz S, Misener S. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 365-386.Google Scholar
- Meyer M, Stenzel U, Hofreiter M: Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform. Nat Protoc. 2008, 3: 267-278. 10.1038/nprot.2007.520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chevreux B, Wetter T, Suhai S: Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information. Computer Science and Biology: Proceedings of the German Conference on Bioinformatics (GCB). 1999, 99: 45-56.Google Scholar
- Dice LR: Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology. 1945, 26: 297-302. 10.2307/1932409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F: Data Analysis Methods. Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Edited by: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann J. 2003, Enfield Science Publishers, Montpellier, 43-76.Google Scholar
- Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Inghelandt D, Reif J, Dhillon B, Flament P, Melchinger A: Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm. Theor Appl Genet. 2011, 123: 11-20. 10.1007/s00122-011-1562-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones ES, Mahoney NL, Hayward MD, Armstead AP, Jones JG, Humphreys MO, King IP, Kishida T, Yamada T, Balfourier F: An enhanced molecular marker based genetic map of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) reveals comparative relationships with other Poaceae genomes. Genome. 2002, 45: 282-295. 10.1139/g01-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sim S, Chang T, Curley J, Warnke SE, Barker RE, Jung G: Chromosomal rearrangements differentiating the ryegrass genome from the Triticeae, oat, and rice genomes using common heterologous RFLP probes. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 110: 1011-1019. 10.1007/s00122-004-1916-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alm V, Fang C, Busso CS, Devos KM, Vollan K, Grieg Z, Rognli OA: A linkage map of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) and comparative mapping with other Poaceae species. Theor Appl Gene. 2003, 108: 25-10.1007/s00122-003-1399-5. –40View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cogan N, Ponting R, Vecchies A, Drayton M, George J, Dracatos P, Dobrowolski M, Sawbridge T, Smith K, Spangenberg G: Gene-associated single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Mol Genet Genomics. 2006, 276: 101-112. 10.1007/s00438-006-0126-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z: Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005, 437: 376-380.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rustgi S, Bandopadhyay R, Balyan HS, Gupta PK: EST-SNPs in bread wheat: discovery, validation, genotyping and haplotype structure. Czech J Genet Plant. 2009, 45: 106-116.Google Scholar
- Trick M, Long Y, Meng J, Bancroft I: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in the polyploid Brassica napus using Solexa transcriptome sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009, 7: 334-346. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00396.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byers R, Harker D, Yourstone S, Maughan P, Udall J: Development and mapping of SNP assays in allotetraploid cotton. 2012, , , 1-14.Google Scholar
- Lawless K, Cogan N, Drayton M, George J, Bannan N, Wilkinson T, Smith K, Spangenberg G, Forster J: In vitro discovery and characterisation of gene-associated SNPs for genetic improvement of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Legume Genetics and Genomics Conference. Brisbane, Australia. 2006.
- Barbazuk BW, Emrich SJ, Chen HD, Schnable PS: SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing. The Plant Journal. 2007, 51: 910-918. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03193.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson J, Wang S, Wu Y, Li X, Antony G, White F, Yu J: Single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery by high-throughput sequencing in sorghum. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 352-10.1186/1471-2164-12-352.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grattapaglia D, Silva Junior O, Kirst M, Lima B, Faria D, Pappas G: High-throughput SNP genotyping in the highly heterozygous genome ofEucalyptus: assay success, polymorphism and transferability across species. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11: 65-10.1186/1471-2229-11-65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu J, Zhang Z, Zhu C, Tabanao DA, Pressoir G, Tuinstra MR, Kresovich S, Todhunter RJ, Buckler ES: Simulationappraisal of the adequacy of number of background markers for relationship estimation in association mapping. The Plant Genome. 2009, 2: 63-77. 10.3835/plantgenome2008.09.0009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akhunov E, Nicolet C, Dvorak J: Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in polyploid wheat with the Illumina GoldenGate assay. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 119: 507-517. 10.1007/s00122-009-1059-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blake NK, Sherman JD, Dvořák J, Talbert LE: Genome-specific primer sets for starch biosynthesis genes in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 109: 1295-1302. 10.1007/s00122-004-1743-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caldwell KS, Dvořák J, Lagudah ES, Akhunov E, Luo M, Wolters P, Powell W: Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their d-genome diploid ancestor. Genetics. 2004, 167: 941-947. 10.1534/genetics.103.016303.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ravel C, Praud S, Murigneux A, Canaguier A, Sapet F, Samson D, Balfourier F, Dufour P, Chalhoub B, Brunel D: Single-nucleotide polymorphism frequency in a set of selected lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome. 2006, 49: 1131-1139. 10.1139/g06-067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hand M, Ponting R, Drayton M, Lawless K, Cogan N, Charles Brummer E, Sawbridge T, Spangenberg G, Smith K, Forster J: Identification of homologous, homoeologous and paralogous sequence variants in an outbreeding allopolyploid species based on comparison with progenitor taxa. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008, 280: 293-304. 10.1007/s00438-008-0365-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Udall JA, Swanson JM, Haller K, Rapp RA, Sparks ME, Hatfield J, Yu Y, Wu Y, Dowd C, Arpat AB: A global assembly of cotton ESTs. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 441-450. 10.1101/gr.4602906.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao K, Tung C-W, Eizenga GC, Wright MH, Ali ML, Price AH, Norton GJ, Islam MR, Reynolds A, Mezey J: Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nat Commun. 2011, 2: 467-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML: Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2011, 12: 499-510. 10.1038/nrg3012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE: A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. 2011, , , 6-Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.