Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Tools to kill: Genome of one of the most destructive plant pathogenic fungi Macrophomina phaseolina

BMC Genomics volume 13, Article number: 493 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Macrophomina phaseolina is one of the most destructive necrotrophic fungal pathogens that infect more than 500 plant species throughout the world. It can grow rapidly in infected plants and subsequently produces a large amount of sclerotia that plugs the vessels, resulting in wilting of the plant.

Results

We sequenced and assembled ~49 Mb into 15 super-scaffolds covering 92.83% of the M. phaseolina genome. We predict 14,249 open reading frames (ORFs) of which 9,934 are validated by the transcriptome. This phytopathogen has an abundance of secreted oxidases, peroxidases, and hydrolytic enzymes for degrading cell wall polysaccharides and lignocelluloses to penetrate into the host tissue. To overcome the host plant defense response, M. phaseolina encodes a significant number of P450s, MFS type membrane transporters, glycosidases, transposases, and secondary metabolites in comparison to all sequenced ascomycete species. A strikingly distinct set of carbohydrate esterases (CE) are present in M. phaseolina, with the CE9 and CE10 families remarkably higher than any other fungi. The phenotypic microarray data indicates that M. phaseolina can adapt to a wide range of osmotic and pH environments. As a broad host range pathogen, M. phaseolina possesses a large number of pathogen-host interaction genes including those for adhesion, signal transduction, cell wall breakdown, purine biosynthesis, and potent mycotoxin patulin.

Conclusions

The M. phaseolina genome provides a framework of the infection process at the cytological and molecular level which uses a diverse arsenal of enzymatic and toxin tools to destroy the host plants. Further understanding of the M. phaseolina genome-based plant-pathogen interactions will be instrumental in designing rational strategies for disease control, essential to ensuring global agricultural crop production and security.

Background

Macrophomina phaseolina, a global devastating necrotrophic fungal pathogen, infects more than 500 plant hosts [1]. It includes major food crops (maize, sorghum [2]), pulse crops (common bean [3], green gram [4]), fiber crops (jute [5], cotton [6]), and oil crops (soybean [1], sunflower [7], sesame [8]). Despite its wide host range, Macrophomina is a monotypic genus [9].

Diseases caused by M. phaseolina (e.g., seedling blight, charcoal rot, stem rot, and root rot) are favored with higher temperatures (30-35°C) and low soil moisture [10]. It is difficult to control M. phaseolina due to its persistence as sclerotia in the soil and plant debris [11]. Recently, increased incidence of the pathogen on diverse crop species has been reported worldwide [12–14], highlighting the importance of this disease to crop production in drought prone regions.

The fungus has a wide geographical distribution, and is especially found in tropical and subtropical countries with arid to semi-arid climates in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America [15–17]. This pathogen can result in severe crop losses. For example, charcoal rot is a serious problem of soybean, which accounted for a total yield loss of $173.80 million in the United States during 2002 [18]. In Bangladesh, the fiber yield of jute is reduced by 30% due to this pathogen.

M. phaseolina is an anamorphic fungus in the ascomycete family Botryosphaeriaceae. The fungus can remain viable for more than 4 years in soil and crop residue as sclerotia (Figure 1a) [11]. The M. phaseolina hyphae initially invade the cortical tissue of jute plants, followed by sclerotia formation, causing stem rot disease (Figure 1b, c). Gray-black mycelia and sclerotia are produced (Figure 1c) and the infected area exhibits disease symptoms (Figure 1d). The conidia are hyaline, aseptate, thin-walled, and elliptical (Figure 1e). Under favorable conditions, hyphae germinate from the sclerotia and infect the roots of the host plant by penetrating the plant cell wall through mechanical pressure and/or chemical softening [19]. The disease progresses from leaf yellowing to wilting and ultimately plant death (Figure 1f).

Figure 1
figure 1

Infection of jute by M. phaseolina . (a) Stereomicrograph of sclerotia that exists in soil and crop residue. (b) Pathogen produces extensive and profuse aerial hyphae to invade the stem bark. (c) Longitudinal section of stem bark showing inter- and intracellular mycelium and sclerotia. (d) During early rainy season, hyphae penetrate the plant cell wall and produce disease symptoms. (e) Light micrograph of globose ostiolate pycnidia and spores of M. phaseolina. (f) Diseased plants showing infection of the stem, which eventually wilt and prematurely die (Inset).

Full size image

Currently, genetic information on M. phaseolina is scarce with only 176 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and 903 nucleotide sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Here we report the draft genome sequence of highly destructive plant pathogen M. phaseolina to gain insight into the molecular basis of pathogenesis.

Results and discussion

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of M. phaseolina was sequenced using a whole-genome shotgun approach. A total of 6.92 Gb of raw sequence was generated from a combination of 454 and Illumina platforms (Additional file 1: Table S1). The resulting assembly is 49.29 Mb of which 98.53% is non-gapped sequence (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S2). Mapping with Newbler GS Reference Mapper (v2.5.3) showed 96.50% reads and 99.11% bases mapped to the reference assembly. The draft genome sequence consists of 94 scaffolds, with 15 super scaffolds covering 92.83% of the total assembled length (Additional file 1: Table S2). We predicted 14,249 protein-coding genes and 9,934 were validated by the transcriptome ( Additional file 1: Table S3).

Table 1 Genome assembly and annotation statistics
Full size table

We examined the homology between M. phaseolina and 12 other fungal genomes under the classes of Saccharomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Agaricomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes. The results revealed that 71% of the genes in the M. phaseolina genome have homologs in other fungal genomes and the remaining 29% are orphan genes (Figure 2a). Among the orphan genes, 51.11% are found in the transcriptome.

Figure 2
figure 2

Homology, syntenic, and phylogenetic relationship of M. phaseolina . (a) Comparative analyses of orthologous and paralogous gene families of 13 fungal species. Number of genes are presented for each component. Clustering was done by using OrthoMCL (MCL-10-201). (b) Synteny of M. phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum using whole genome data. The reference genome (Aspergillus fumigatus) is broken up into eight chromosomes and syntenic regions are represented by two vertical columns with color. (c) Phylogenetic tree showing the positioning of M. phaseolina within the pezizomycotina.

Full size image

The comparison of M. phaseolina protein families with other ascomycete fungal species is shown in Table 2 (also see Additional file 1: Table S4). The genome contains 13.07% (1,863) secreted proteins as compared to 7-10% in other plant pathogens [20]. Surprisingly, M. phaseolina has the lowest number of proteases among ascomycete fungal species [21] (Table 2). On the other hand, the genome is distinct from other fungi by having the highest number of cytochrome P450, glycosidase, and secondary metabolite backbone genes. We predict that this might be one of the main strategies of M. phaseolina to overcome the host plant defense response by using various secondary metabolites.

Table 2 Sizes of selected protein families in M. phaseolina and other fungi
Full size table

Conserved syntenic and phylogenetic relationship

Pairwise comparison revealed that the genome structures of M. phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum, one of the most important phytopathogenic and toxigenic fungi, have large areas of synteny (Figure 2b). Among the 14,249 M. phaseolina genes, 7,767 (54.10%) are shared with F. oxysporum (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The large number of shared genes may reflect common strategies for infecting a remarkably broad host range. Ninety seven percent of the M. phaseolina genome comprises non-repetitive sequences, and the orthologs shared with the F. oxysporum genome display an average 52% identity. A phylogenetic analysis revealed the evolutionary relationship among fungal taxa and the positioning of M. phaseolina within the pezizomycotina (Figure 2c).

Global paralog network

Of the 14,249 predicted proteins, we found homologs for 7,999 proteins in nine fungal genomes. To characterize functional protein families in the M. phaseolina genome, we constructed a database in Pathway Studio (Ariadne Genomics Inc.) containing M. phaseolina proteins with functional annotation from the orthologs in nine other fungal genomes, predicted interologs, predicted pathways, and paralog network. The largest paralog families were identified by clustering the paralog network consisting of 6,210 paralog links representing paralog pairs with sequence homology above 30%. We identified 77 paralog families having more than six proteins (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The larger paralog families were the cytochrome P450 (151), MFS type membrane transporters (222), and transposases (101). The large number of transposons in the M. phaseolina genome suggests that they could be the primary mechanism for mutagenesis and gene duplications, which in turn may promote the ability of M. phaseolina to infect new plant species.

There was also a high number of paralogs for the oxido-reductase class of enzymes which includes dehydrogenases, aldehyde dehydrogenases, choline dehydrogenases, cytochrome P450 and aldose reductases. These oxido-reductase enzymes produce and utilize a large variety of secondary metabolites [22] which may trigger M. phaseolina to survive in a wide range of physical environments and facilitate to infect new plant species. The PTH11 paralog family consists of a large number of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR; 44), which contain a cysteine-rich fungal extracellular membrane domain. This may facilitate M. phaseolina to be more virulent.

Repetitive DNA and transposable elements

Wide virulence capabilities of a genome are often associated with transposon-mediated inactivation or deletion of pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-encoding genes whose products trigger the plant adaptive immune system [23]. The M. phaseolina genome comprises 2.84% repetitive DNA and 3.98% transposable elements. The transposable elements are classified into 11 families (Table 3). Most of them are DNA transposases, with particular abundance of the subclasses gypsy (918), Ty1_Copia (331), and DDE_1 (242). LINE (184) and hAT (136) are also relatively abundant. Transposable elements appear to be tightly clustered in the genome (Additional file 2: Figure S3). Evidence for repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) within the transposable elements was searched using RIPCAL [24], but this mutational bias was not observed in the M. phaseolina genome (RIP index 0.87). The genome contains more fragmented pseudogenes (894) than processed pseudogenes (31) caused by mobile elements, but lacks duplicated pseudogenes. This is consistent with transposons making a greater contribution to genetic instability in M. phaseolina.

Table 3 Families of transposable elements in the M. phaseolina genome
Full size table

Carbohydrate degrading enzymes

Phytopathogenic fungi secrete a cocktail of hydrolytic enzymes (including carbohydrate-active enzymes; CAZymes) for degrading the plant cell wall and penetrating into the host tissue [25]. The M. phaseolina genome encodes 362 putative CAZymes including 219 glycoside hydrolases (GH), 56 glycosyltransferases (GT), 65 carbohydrate esterases (CE), 6 carbohydrate binding modules (CBM), and 16 polysaccharide lyases (PL) comprising more than 80 distinct families. These enzymes do not appear to be tightly clustered, but are distributed throughout the genome ( Additional file 2: Figure S4).

The number of GHs possessed by M. phaseolina is higher than the average for plant pathogenic fungi and is nearly four times more abundant than the GTs, consistent with the importance of carbohydrate degradation rather than formation. There are 25 putative endoglucanases (GH5, GH12, GH45, GH61), 7 exocellobiohydrolases (GH6, GH7, GH81), and 28 β-glucosidases (GH1, GH3, GH17) for the hydrolysis of cellulose. The cellulolytic activity of M. phaseolina was shown to be significantly higher than that of other fungal species (i.e., Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma reesei) [26], reflecting the pathogenicity potency of this fungus.

The M. phaseolina genome also has the highest number of CEs than any other sequenced fungal genome so far (Table 4), with particular expansion of families CE9 (chitin metabolism) and CE10 (sterol esterases). Thirty two CE10 members are found in the M. phaseolina genome, but is absent in eight other species (Table 4). Nine CE5 candidate cutinases were found in the genome, suggesting that these enzymes are critical for initial penetration through the plant cuticle. The complement of pectin lyases (PL1, PL3, PL4), pectin hydrolases (GH28, GH88), and pectin esterases allows M. phaseolina to fully saccharify pectin. Other polysaccharide degrading enzymes predicted in the genome include catalytic activities for degrading starch and glycogen, hemicellulose, chitin, and β-glucans.

Table 4 Comparison of the number of carbohydrate esterases of M. phaseolina with other fungi
Full size table

Genes involved in lignin degradation

Major components of the lignin depolymerization system in M. phaseolina include laccases, lignin peroxidases, galactose oxidases, and chloroperoxidases, haloperoxidases, and heme peroxidases. M. phaseolina strain MS6 indeed demonstrates ligninolytic activity (Additional file 2: Figure S5). In comparison to seven other fungal species, M. phaseolina possesses the highest number of laccases (Table 5). Lignin peroxidase has been reported only in Phanerochaete chrysosporium thus far [27] and interestingly, this study revealed the second occurrence in M. phaseolina. Six extracellular class II heme peroxidases (IPR002016), 6 chloroperoxidases, and 7 haloperoxidases also contribute to the ligninolytic activity. In addition, we found a significant number of GMC oxidoreductases (40), which includes alcohol oxidases and cellobiose dehydrogenases. These enzymes are known to be directly involved in lignocellulosic degradation [27].

Table 5 Comparison of the number of lignin degrading enzymes of M. phaseolina with other fungi
Full size table

Virulence associated genes

As a wide host ranged pathogenic fungus, M. phaseolina is expected to possess a significant number of pathogen-host interaction genes. We searched the genome using the pathogen-host interaction database (PHI-base) [28] and identified 537 putative PHI genes (Additional file 1: Table S5). These genes play diverse roles in pathogenesis including adhesion, signal transduction, cell wall breakdown, purine biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of the potent mycotoxin patulin. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters aid in defending the pathogen from host-produced secondary metabolites as well as provide essential nutrients [29]. A number of detoxification genes are present, such as those encoding cytochrome P450 (IPR001128), Cof protein (IPR000150), and superoxide dismutase, Cu/Zn binding (IPR001424). In addition, several beta-ketoacyl synthases (IPR000794) involved in the biosynthesis of a polyketide antibiotic [30] as well as some tetracycline resistance genes have been identified in M. phaseolina. These data suggest that the M. phaseolina genome encodes a large repertoire of pathogenicity-associated genes which may be involved in the pathogenesis of this organism.

Signal transduction

The perception of environmental cues through cell-surface receptors and relaying the information to intracellular signaling pathways is essential for pathogenicity. The PTH11-like GPCR is a PHI protein shown to regulate Magnaporthe grisea appressorium differentiation in response to the plant surface [31]. The M. phaseolina genome has 44 putative PTH11-like GPCRs compared to an average of 34 in other pathogenic fungi (Table 2). The putative PTH11-like GPCRs are grouped into seven subfamilies. Three G-protein alpha subunits are present to transduce the extracellular signals leading to infection specific development, which is required for pathogenicity [32, 33]. The 140 protein kinases in M. phaseolina is above the average (131) found in other ascomycete fungi (Table 2). Since signal transduction is a crucial part of fungal development and the infection process, indeed most of the kinases had orthologs in PHI-base (134/140). This result indicates that protein kinases in M. phaseolina might play a functional role in pathogen-host interaction.

Transport and detoxification of compounds

Plant pathogenic fungi use a wide range of strategies to gain access to the carbon sources of their host plants and counter the plant defense response. The M. phaseolina genome encodes 839 transporter genes comprising 106 families ( Additional file 1: Table S6). Majority of the transporter genes (782/839) were similar to those cataloged in PHI-base. A large proportion of transporters belong to the MFS family (270), but the ABC superfamily (59) and Amino Acid-Polyamine-Organocation (APC) family (40) are also well represented in the genome ( Additional file 1: Table S6). M. phaseolina has more amino acid transporters (54) than other pathogenic fungi (29 to 38), revealing that this fungus might be able to access a wide range of protein degradation products from host sources. The sucrose and galactoside transporter (MFS superfamily) is required by Metarhizium anisopliae for rhizosphere competence but not for virulence [34]. The M. phaseolina genome has 15 sucrose and galactoside transporters, whereas Fusarium graminearum contains 12, suggesting these genes could be generally important for establishing plant-fungus relationships.

We found a relatively large number of genes involved in detoxification (Table 2). The dehydrogenases (411), acyl-CoA N-acetyltransferases (7), monooxygenases (104), and cytochrome P450s (256) were preferentially expanded in M. phaseolina. P450s play an important role in various hydroxylation and oxidation processes including secondary metabolism as well as the breakdown of toxins and other xenobiotic compounds [35]. For example, pisatin demethylase, a P450 from the plant pathogenic fungus Nectria haematococca, detoxifies a specific class of plant defense compounds [36]. The genome was particularly enriched in zinc-containing alcohol dehydrogenases (92) required for the biosynthesis of mannitol, a crucial factor for stress tolerance and virulence in the animal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans[37]. The monooxygenases are generally involved in rapid elimination of plant polyphenols (which can act as antifungal agents), thus reducing the plant defense [38–40].

Secondary metabolic pathways

Plant pathogenic fungi produce diverse secondary metabolites that aid in pathogenicity, such as host selective toxins [41]. We identified 75 putative secondary metabolite genes in the M. phaseolina genome, compared with 32 in M. grisea, 37 in Botrytis cinerea, 29 in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and 37 in F. graminearum (Table 6). There are 35 genes predicted to encode polyketide synthases (PKS), compared with 23 PKS genes in M. grisea. An impressive number of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) are found in M. phaseolina, which catalyze the production of cyclic peptides including numerous toxins. Only 6 NRPS genes and 8 hybrid PKS-NRPS are present in M. grisea, whereas 28 NRPS and 12 PKS-NRPS genes are in M. phaseolina. Virulence of several fungi (e.g., Cochliobolus heterostrophus, C. miyabeanus, F. graminearum, and Alternaria brassicicola) is mediated by particular siderophores, a class of secondary metabolites for iron uptake whose synthesis involves a NRPS [42]. M. phaseolina contains a NRPS (contig00285) which is similar to HTS1 (46% identity), the key enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of the host-selective HC-toxin that confers the specificity of Cochliobolus carbonum to maize [43]. The NRPS-like proteins encoded by contig00324, contig00467, contig00109, contig00163, and contig00323 are most similar to Ace1, a PKS-NRPS hybrid that confers avirulence to M. grisea during rice infection [44].

Table 6 Distribution of secondary metabolite gene families in different plant pathogenic fungi
Full size table

Phenotypic response in relation to different environmental stimuli

We used Phenotype Microarray (PM) analysis (Biolog Inc.) to evaluate M. phaseolina against ~960 different carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, nutrient supplement, peptide nitrogen, osmolytes, and pH sources (Figure 3; Additional file 2: Figures S6-S11). Of particular interest, we found that the adaptability to wide osmotic and pH ranges could be a contributing factor to this organism’s pervasive nature.

Figure 3
figure 3

Phenotype profiles of M. phaseolina . (a) Osmotic/ion effects. (b) pH effects. Only conditions with a final OmniLog value (at 96 hr) ≥ 200 were incorporated into the heat maps. Color scale indicates the growth of the organism in particular substrate over time.

Full size image

PM analysis revealed that M. phaseolina is capable of growing in sodium salt concentrations of 1-8%, with maximal growth at 2-4% (Figure 3a). In comparison, 3 % NaCl is toxic for Saccharomyces cerevisiae but is close to the optimum for growth of the halophilic black yeast Hortaea werneckii, one of the most salt-tolerant eukaryotic organisms so far described [45]. The efficient utilization of various osmolytes provides clues to M. phaseolina’s osmoadaptation strategy. It was recently shown that salinity increases the disease severity caused by M. phaseolina on Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean), by enhancing the growth rate of the pathogen as well as weakening the plant due to ion (K+ and Na+) imbalance [46]. This indicates that M. phaseolina could be a greater threat in areas with saline soils.

pH is one of the major environmental factors affecting pathogenicity. The M. phaseolina genome contains 2 putative PalH and 5 PalI proteins which are responsible for sensing ambient pH [47]. Moreover, there are several pH-regulated proteins including 19 acid phosphatases, 2 α-L-arabinofuranosidases, and 7 alkaline phosphatases. The presence of acid and alkaline phosphatases indicates that M. phaseolina has an extraordinary capability to neutralize both acidic and alkaline environments for its growth. This is clearly evident from our PM analysis. The results revealed that M. phaseolina can grow in pH ranging from strongly acidic to alkaline (pH 3.5 to 10), with maximum growth between pH 5 to 7 (Figure 3b). Therefore, M. phaseolina has a robust pH sensing system which enables it to adapt to adverse conditions.

Pathogenesis of M. phaseolina

The array of metabolic genes within the M. phaseolina genome reflects its pathogenic lifestyle (Figure 4; Additional file 1: Table S7).

Figure 4
figure 4

Pathogenic lifestyle and infection process of M. phaseolina. (a) Conidia or sclerotia are released from the pathogen. (b) Conidia or sclerotia disperse during early rainy season and contact the host tissue with the aid of transglutaminase-like proteins and cellulose-binding elicitor lectin. (c) Pathogen neutralizes the initial host defense with salicylate-1-monooxygenase. (d) Conidia form appressorium under the control of the central regulator PMK1. (e) Penetration peg invades into the plant epidermis. (f) Inside the host, the pathogen releases an array of different toxins and cell wall degrading enzymes and finally breakdown the host defense. (g) Results in host cell death and self-establishment.

Full size image

The production and dispersal of conidia is important for fungal survival and infection of new hosts. Hyperosmotic stress is one of the environmental stimuli that often trigger conidiation [48]. The M. phaseolina genome encodes MPH_01444, a homolog of the MAP kinase OSM1, which regulates the osmotic stress response (to maintain cellular turgor) along with MPH_10325 and MPH_03305 (Figure 5; Additional file 1: Table S8). In M. grisea, deletion of OSM1 has pleiotropic effects including osmotic sensitivity, reduced conidiation, and overproduction of appressoria [49].

Figure 5
figure 5

Pathogenicity regulatory pathway of M. phaseolina . Dotted line, Regulation; Solid line (gray), Molecular transport; Solid line (yellow-green), Protein modification.

Full size image

Adhesion of fungal propagules to the plant surface is the prerequisite to establish disease. We identified 8 homologs of Cellulose-Binding Elicitor Lectin (CBEL), a cell surface glycoprotein that plays a role in adhesion to host wall components [50], as well as a Class II hydrophobic protein which mediates contact and communication between the fungus and its environment [51]. M. phaseolina also has three transglutaminase-like proteins containing a 13-amino acid motif (Pep-13) that is able to stimulate the plant defense response. Presence of these cell surface proteins suggests that M. phaseolina produces PAMPs, which can be efficiently perceived by a wide range of plant species. Activation of the plant immune system results in the synthesis of antifungal peptides, inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes, and phytoalexins. At the same time, the fungus responds to surface inductive cues via a cAMP-dependent pathway in order to initiate the infection process and combat the plant defense response (e.g., production of salicylate-1-monooxygenase).

Invasion begins with the emergence of a germ tube from the conidium, followed by appressorium formation. The developing appressorium swells as the cytoskeleton and Golgi vesicles accumulate in the tip. In bean rust pathogen Uromyces appendiculatus, the cytoskeleton and vesicles in the apex of the hypha are reorganized along the cell wall within 4 minutes of signal perception [52]. Enzymes for fungal cell wall synthesis (e.g., chitin synthase and β-1,3-glucan synthase) as well as cell wall degradation (e.g., cutinase and β-1,4-endoglucanase) are contained within different vesicles. M. phaseolina also synthesizes phytosphingosine and phytoceramide to protect the cell membrane from mechanical damage during penetration of the host cell. High turgor pressure is generated within the appressorium, allowing the penetration peg to break through the plant epidermis. Secretion of a variety of cell wall degrading enzymes and other toxins aid in the invasion of the host. These hyphae penetrate epidermal walls directly and subsequently colonize the tissue by intra- and intercellular growth (Figure 1c).

Regulation of these invasion processes involves both cAMP-dependent and MAP kinase pathways (Figure 5). Surface recognition and appressoria initiation is dependent on the adenylate cyclase MAC1 (MPH_00975). Early research revealed that deletion of the MAC1 gene blocked appressorium formation in M. grisea[53]. The catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (MPH_07566 and MPH_00397) is also required for appressoria formation and penetration. Furthermore, the M. phaseolina genome contains heterotrimeric G-proteins (MPH_02326, MPH_07066, MPH_00770, MPH_05860 and MPH_09815), which could also contribute to the signaling pathways for pathogenesis. The later stage of plant penetration is regulated by the MAP kinase PMK1 (MPH_06596). A PMK1 mutant of M. grisea is unable to make appressoria in rice plants and is non-pathogenic. Therefore, PMK1 is specifically involved in the regulation of appressorium formation in response to surface signals and is also necessary for invasive growth [54].

Conclusions

M. phaseolina is a soil-borne plant pathogenic fungus that infects major food, fiber, and oil crops, but it is also an opportunistic pathogen of humans [55]. Therefore, an understanding of the genetic basis underlying pathogenicity is crucial for controlling this pathogen.

Whole genome analysis showed that M. phaseolina is distinct from those of other known phytopathogenic fungi. We found 12% of the genes encoded by the genome have significant similarities with genes involved in pathogen-host interactions. M. phaseolina possesses a large repertoire of hydrolytic enzymes for degrading all major components of the plant cell wall and cuticle, including cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, lignin, and cutin. The overall number of CAZymes is particularly high, primarily due to the abundance of GHs. Comparison with genomes of other phytopathogenic fungi reveals a distinct set of CEs in M. phaseolina, with significant expansion of families CE9 and CE10. CEs are considered as the first line of attack during host invasion and therefore play a key role in pathogenesis [56]. Extensive genetic diversity was also observed within complex gene families encoding peroxidases, oxidases, and cytochrome P450s. Interestingly, the genome has a considerable number of lignin peroxidases, extracellular Class II heme peroxidases, chloroperoxidases, and haloperoxidases compared with lignocellulose degrading fungus P. chrysosporium. The vast array of genes enables M. phaseolina to tackle nearly any type of cell wall composition it encounters, resulting in highly efficient penetration of different hosts and tissues.

We have identified differences in gene content among M. phaseolina and other plant pathogenic fungi. This is the first analysis of the genome of a plant pathogenic fungus that contains a large number of enzymes for the degradation of cell wall polysaccharides and lignocellulose. The M. phaseolina genome laid the foundation to elucidate its specialized mechanism to infect more than 500 plant hosts. Furthermore, it would decipher in-depth understanding of pathogenesis to resistance strategies.

Methods

Strain, growth condition, and nucleic acid isolation

M. phaseolina strain MS6 was isolated from an infected jute plant at Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI), Dhaka. Strain MS6 is the most virulent among the 19 isolates so far isolated in BJRI. This strain has mycelium that is grey-white at the initial stage and turns dark green at the mature stage. It is coarse with feathery strand. The sclerotia are embedded in the strand. The fungus was cultured at 30°C in liquid potato dextrose medium. DNA and RNA were extracted as previously described [57, 58], respectively.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of the M. phaseolina MS6 strain was performed using the 454 and Illumina sequencing platforms. We generated a total of 6.92 Gb raw data, having 40.56 millions of raw reads. In the 454 sequencing strategy, both single-end (SE) and paired-end (PE) genomic libraries were constructed, of which 2.38 Gb of shotgun sequences provided 48.29x coverage and 1.57 Gb of 8 kb, 15 kb, and 20 kb PE sequences provided 31.95x coverage of the M. phaseolina genome. In the Illumina sequencing strategy, 2.97 Gb of PE libraries were generated, of which 1.73 Gb of 500 bp PE sequences provided 35.11x coverage and 1.24 Gb of 3 kb mate-paired sequences provided 25.14x coverage of the M. phaseolina genome.

We produced a high quality assembly of the M. phaseolina genome using Newbler assembly program version 2.5.3 (http://my454.com/products/analysis-software/index.asp). For both de novo assembly and reference mapping of the M. phaseolina genome, we only used raw data generated from 454 pyrosequencing. For de novo assembly, we fed the Newbler GS de novo assembler first with the shotgun sequences in one-step form and later with paired-end sequences incrementally in order to get better contigging and scaffolding. About 96.50% raw reads were assembled into 3,036 contigs and 94 scaffolds having 98.92% bases with Q40 plus bases. For reference mapping, we used Newbler GS reference mapper to map the raw sequence files onto the all contigs file generated that gave 98.89% reads and 99.11% bases mapped to the reference.

We also used Illumina PE sequences with GapCloser version 1.10, a tool from SOAP de novo (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html), in order to close the gaps inside the scaffolds that were generated from the Newbler scaffolding process. A total of 785 gaps were detected by GapCloser that cover 1.5 Mb residues of which 197 gaps were completely filled up, leaving only 1.47% (0.73 Mb) gaps inside the 94 scaffolds.

We checked the relative completeness of the M. phaseolina MS6 draft assembly version 1.0 by performing core gene annotation using the CEGMA pipeline [59]. The resulting contigs as well as scaffolds from the M. phaseolina MS6 assembly were independently analyzed through this pipeline. In both cases we have found 245 (98.79%) complete gene models out of 248 ultra-conserved core eukaryotic genes (CEGs) present in the M. phaseolina genome.

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under the accession AHHD00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, AHHD01000000.

Genome annotation

We used Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments (PASA), a eukaryotic genome annotation pipeline [60], to generate potential training gene sets that were used to train other ab initio gene prediction software like Augustus v. 2.5.5 [61] and Glimmer HMM v. 3.0.1 [62] for predicting M. phaseolina genes.

A total of 13,481 gene assemblies under 11,414 gene clusters predicted by PASA, along with cDNA of M. phaseolina and other 4 closely related species (Aspergillus nidulans, M. grisea, P. marneffei, and S. cerevisiae) were used for this training purpose. Augustus and Glimmer independently predicted 12,231 and 11,432 ORFs, respectively, which were then subjected to correct gene structure annotation by EVidenceModeler (EVM) [63]. EVM, when combined with PASA, yields a comprehensive, configurable annotation system that predicts protein-coding genes and alternatively spliced isoforms.

We also used Analysis and Annotation Tool (AAT) [64] as a pipeline for transcript and protein alignments. To align the M. phaseolina genome independently, we used cDNA of its own with cDNA of other 4 related fungal species (described earlier) and fungal protein databases downloaded from Fungal Genome Research (http://fungalgenome.org/data/PEP/). These two along with PASA transcript alignments were used as transcript and protein evidences for EVM. Finally, a total of 14,249 ab initios were predicted of which 11,975 were corrected gene structures from EVM along with 2,274 genes from Augustus and Glimmer underlying the intergenic region of EVM predictions.

The ab initios were then subjected to InterProScan [65] and nr BLAST (threshold value of E < 10-5) [66] for searching functional domains and homologies. Results revealed a total of 10,250 genes with either potential domains or homologies with other fungal proteins and 3,999 novel genes out of 14,249 predicted protein coding genes of M. phaseolina.

Transfer RNA-coding regions were searched using tRNAscan-SE [67] and rRNA was searched using RNAmmer [68]. Repetitive elements were predicted by using RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) and Putative Transposon elements were identified by Transposon-PSI (http://transposonpsi.sourceforge.net), a program that performs tBLASTn searches using a set of position specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) specific for different TE families.

The genomes of M. phaseolina and F. oxysporum were compared using MUMmer [69] tools to identify regions of synteny, with Aspergillus fumigatus used as a reference genome. For visualizing multiple genome comparisons, SyntenyMiner (http://syntenyminer.sourceforge.net/) was also used to visualize orthologous gene clusters among the organisms.

To identify proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism, we used the Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZy) database (http://www.cazy.org/). All CAZy related GenBank accession numbers were first downloaded from the CAZy website and then sequences were downloaded from NCBI using a custom python script. These sequences were searched by RPS-BLAST against the Pfam database to reveal protein domain architectures and compared against the Pfam domains identified in M. phaseolina proteins. The sequences were also compared by BLASTp against all M. phaseolina proteins to confirm the Pfam database matches.

Putative secondary metabolites (PKS and NRPS) were identified by using antiSMASH [70]. Pathogenicity and virulence associated genes were identified using the PHI-base database (http://www.phibase.org/), a database that catalogs experimentally verified pathogenicity, virulence, and effector genes from fungal, Oomycete, and bacterial pathogens which infect animal, plant, fungal and insect hosts. Briefly, all sequences were first downloaded from the PHI-base database and then compared by BLASTp against all M. phaseolina proteins to confirm the presence of homologous genes in the M. phaseolina genome.

The in silico predictions were manually curated and tested experimentally with several larger gene families such as CAZymes and lignin degrading protein coding genes by PCR.

Construction of phylogenetic tree

Orthologous relationships were determined for a 14-way clustering from the complete genomes of the 14 fungal taxa: Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium chrysogenum, Grosmannia clavigera, Magnaporthe grisea, Podospora anserina, M. phaseolina, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Laccaria bicolor, Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Postia placenta, Yarrowia lipolytica, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Trichoderma reesei. All predicted protein sequences for the genomes of these fungi were searched against each other using BLASTp and clustered into orthologous groups using MCL-10-201. Single-copy orthologs were identified as the clusters with exactly one member per species. Phylogenetic relationships were determined from these single-copy orthologs and were aligned with MAFFT [71]. Alignments were pruned with Gblocks [72].

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the JTT matrix-based model [73] and bootstrap value was 1,000. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [74].

Metabolic pathway reconstruction

The Yeast-5 Pathway Studio database (Ariadne Genomics) contains molecular interactions extracted by MedScan natural processing technology for all fungal species from over 1,000,000 Pubmed abstracts annotated with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term “Yeast OR Fungi” and from more than 100,000 full-length open access articles. Proteins in the Yeast-5 database are annotated with Entrez Gene and GenBank identifiers from six fungal genomes: S. cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans JEC21, A. fumigatus Af293, A. nidulans FGSC A4, and Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. To facilitate analysis of the M. phaseolina genome, we have added to the Yeast-5 database annotated proteins from recently sequenced genomes for Ustilago maydis 52 [75], Metarhizium anisopliae ARSEF 23, and Metarhizium acridum CQMa 102 [76].

The Yeast-5 database contains a collection of 303 metabolic pathways copied from MetaCyc. Pathways are represented as a collection of complex database entities called functional classes (enzymes) and a set of corresponding Chemical reactions. Every functional class in the database can contain an unlimited number of protein members performing corresponding enzymatic activity. Usually a set of members includes paralogs of catalytic and regulatory subunits necessary to perform enzymatic activity. The original Yeast-5 database has 444 functional classes with members out of a total of 769 pathways. We augmented the Yeast-5 database with an additional 168 metabolic pathways from RiceCyc and PoplarCyc to increase the pool of candidate enzymatic reactions for metabolic reconstruction of M. phaseolina.

The database of M. phaseolina interologs (predicted interactions) and reconstructed pathways was created by annotating proteins in the Yeast-5 database with M. phaseolina ortholog identifiers. Orthologs for M. phaseolina proteins in other fungal organisms were calculated using the best reciprocal hit method from full length protein sequence similarities calculated from BLAST alignments as described previously [77]. First, orthologs were calculated between M. phaseolina and each of the nine fungal genomes supported in the Yeast-5 database. The best ortholog was then chosen for each M. phaseolina protein among the nine possible ortholog pairs. All interactions extracted for M. phaseolina orthologs were exported from the Yeast-5 database along with pathways containing M. phaseolina orthologs. M. phaseolina interologs and predicted pathways were imported into a new Pathway Studio database for manual pathway reconstruction and genome analysis. Pathways that contained at least one functional class with no M. phaseolina orthologs were manually curated to achieve one of the following three outcomes: a) close the gap by finding members in the M. phaseolina genome and adding them to empty functional classes, b) dismiss entire pathway if gap cannot be closed, or c) remove enzymatic step if empty functional class represents redundant path in the pathway.

To identify paralog families in the M. phaseolina genome, we used BLASTP to calculate all possible protein homologs in the M. phaseolina genome and then selected only homologs that have 30% shared amino acid similarity calculated as the average sequence similarity between two homologs. Paralog pairs were imported into the M. phaseolina database as a new type of interaction called “Paralog”. Protein functional families were identified as clusters in the global Paralog network using the direct force layout algorithm. To assign biological function to each Paralog cluster we found Gene Ontology groups enriched by the proteins in the cluster or simply inspected available functional annotation for proteins in the cluster.

Phenotype microarray analysis

Phenotype microarray (PM) is a high-throughput technique for screening the response of an organism against various substrates. M. phaseolina was evaluated using panels PM1 to PM10 (Biolog Inc.). The PM plates are denoted as PM1 and PM2A MicroPlates for Carbon sources; PM3B MicroPlate for Nitrogen sources; PM4A MicroPlate for Phosphorus and Sulfur sources; PM5 MicroPlate for Nutrient supplements; PM6, PM7, and PM8 MicroPlates for Peptide nitrogen sources; PM9 MicroPlate for Osmolytes; and PM10 MicroPlate for pH. There are 96 wells in each plate, so the substrate utilization patterns by the fungus were evaluated against a total of 960 substrates including 9 negative and 4 positive controls (see Additional file 3 for list of substrates).

M. phaseolina was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 30°C for 72 hr. Active hyphae was inoculated into 30 ml of liquid potato dextrose medium and incubated at 30°C for 60 hr. The mycelia from the liquid culture (~2 g) were washed with physiological buffer solution (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, filter sterilized) at least 7 times to remove nutrient contamination. After washing, the mycelia were aliquoted into two 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and macerated by a pellet pestle motor for 15 minutes. One ml of filamentous fungi inoculating fluid (FF-IF, Biolog) was added into each tube. The solution was transferred into a 15 ml falcon tube and 6 ml of FF-IF was added. The macerated mycelia were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. Six to 8 ml of FF-IF was added to the tube and let stand for at least 40 minutes to settle down the bigger mycelial clumps. Approximately 2 ml from the clear upper portion was harvested for measuring the transmittance at OD590nm. The transmittance was adjusted to 62% for usable concentration of inoculums.

The inoculum suspensions along with different stock solutions were prepared as per the protocol standardized by Biolog (“PM Procedures for Filamentous Fungi”, 25-Aug-07). All the wells of PM 1–10 were inoculated with 100 μl of the inoculum suspensions and incubated in the OmniLog machine at 30°C for 96 hr. The instrument was programmed for recording data from each well in 15 minute intervals. After completion of incubation, the recorded data were extracted and analyzed using TIBCO Spotfire v23.0.0.320. The experiment was replicated three times.

It was observed that there was almost no growth in all the plates up to 40 hr of incubation. We therefore considered the 40 hr incubation readings as the baseline in our analysis. The data for each 8 hrs from three replications were averaged for analysis. Based on the 96 hr reading, all the figures (Figure 3; Additional file 2: Figures S6-S11) were constructed using OmniLog value ≥ 200.

Verification of lignin degradation

We measured the ability of M. phaseolina to degrade lignin on modified Boyd and Kohlmeyer (B&K) agar medium containing 4 mM guaiacol along with 0.001% azure B dye [78]. The medium was inoculated with this fungus and incubated at 30°C in the dark. After 4 days of incubation, a halo of intense brownish white color was formed under and around the fungal colony, and the azure B dye turned from blue to white (Additional file 2: Figure S5). The growth of intense brownish white color fungal colony indicates a positive reaction resulting from guaiacol oxidation [79]. The disappearance of the blue colored medium is also evidence of peroxidase production ( Additional file 2: Figure S5). The discoloration of azure B dye has been positively correlated with the production of lignin peroxidase and Mn dependent peroxidase, but it does not indicate the presence of laccase [80].

Abbreviations

AAT:

Analysis and Annotation Tool

ABC:

ATP-binding cassette

APC:

Amino acid-polyamine-organocation

CAZy:

Carbohydrate active enzyme

CBEL:

Cellulose-binding elicitor lectin

CBM:

Carbohydrate binding module

CE:

Carbohydrate esterase

CEG:

Core eukaryotic gene

DMAT:

Dimethylallyl tryptophan synthase

EST:

Expressed sequence tag

EVM:

EVidenceModeler

GH:

Glycoside hydrolase

GPCR:

G-protein coupled receptor

GT:

Glycosyltransferase

HYBRID:

Hybrid PKS-NRPS enzyme

MeSH:

Medical Subject Heading

MFS:

Major facilitator superfamily

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NRPS:

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase

ORF:

Open reading frame

PAMP:

Pathogen-associated molecular pattern

PASA:

Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments

PDA:

Potato dextrose agar

PE:

Paired-end

PHI:

Pathogen-host interaction

PKS:

Polyketide synthase

PL:

Polysaccharide lyase

PM:

Phenotype microarray

PSSMs:

Position specific scoring matrices

RIP:

Repeat-induced point mutation.

References

  1. Wyllie TD: Charcoal rot of soybean-current status. Soybean Diseases of the North Central Region. Edited by: Wyllie TD, Scott DH. 1988, APS, St. Paul, 106-113.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Su G, Suh SO, Schneider RW, Russin JS: Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology. 2001, 91: 120-126. 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.2.120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayek-Pérez N, López-Castañeda C, López-Salinas E, Cumpián-Gutiérrez J, Acosta-Gallegos JA: Macrophomina phaseolina resistance in common bean under field conditions in Mexico. Agrociencia. 2001, 35: 649-661.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raguchander T, Samiyappan R, Arjunan G: Biocontrol of Macrophomina root rot of mungbean. Indian Phytopathol. 1993, 46: 379-382.

    Google Scholar 

  5. De BK, Chattopadhya SB: Effect of potash on stem rot diseases of jute caused by Macrophomicna phaseolina. J Mycopathol Res. 1992, 30: 51-55.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aly AA, Abdel-Sattar MA, Omar MR, Abd-Elsalam KA: Differential antagonism of Trichoderma sp. against Macrophomina phaseolina. J Plant Protection Res. 2007, 47: 91-102.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khan SK: M. phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of sunflower. Mycopath. 2007, 5: 111-118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dinakaran D, Mohammed N: Identification of resistant sources to root rot of sesame caused by M. phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter. 2001, 16: 68-71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wyllie TD: Charcoal rot. Compendium of Soybean Diseases. Edited by: Sinclair JB, Backman PA. 1993, APS, St. Paul, 30-33. 3

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sandhu A, Singh RD, Sandhu A: Factors influencing susceptibility of cowpea to M. phaseolina. J Mycol Plant Pathol. 1999, 29: 421-424.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Short GE, Wyllie TD, Bristow PR: Survival of M. phaseolina in soil and residue of soybeans. Phytopathology. 1980, 70: 13-17. 10.1094/Phyto-70-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmoud A, Budak H: First report of charcoal rot caused by M. phaseolina in sunflower in Turkey. Plant Dis. 2011, 95: 223-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Avilés M, Castillo S, Bascon J, Zea-Bonilla T, Martín-Sánchez PM, Pérez-Jiménez RM: First report of M. phaseolina causing crown and root rot of strawberry in Spain. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57: 382-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khangura R, Aberra M: First reports of charcoal rot on canola caused by M. phaseolina in Western Australia. Plant Dis. 2009, 93: 666-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gray FA, Kolp BJ, Mohamed MA: A disease survey of crops grown in the Bay Region of Somalia, East Africa. FAO Plant Prot Bull. 1990, 38: 39-47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Diourte M, Starr JL, Jeger MJ, Stack JP, Rosenow DT: Charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) resistance and the effects of water stress on disease development in sorghum. Plant Pathol. 1995, l44: 196-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Tan Y, Ploper LD, Porta-Puglia A, Ram HH, Yorinori JT: Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean producing countries in 1998. Can J Plant Pathol. 2001, 23: 115-121. 10.1080/07060660109506918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wrather JA, Koenning SR, Anderson TR: Effect of diseases on soybean yields in the United States and Ontario (1999–2002). Online. Plant Health Progress. 2003, 10.1094/PHP-2003-0325-01-RV.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ammon V, Wyllie TD, Brown MF: An ultrastructural investigation of pathological alterations induced by M. phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in seedlings of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merril. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1974, 4: 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cuomo CA, Güldener U, Xu JR, Trail F, Turgeon BG, Di Pietro A, Walton JD, Ma LJ, Baker SE, Rep M, Adam G, Antoniw J, Baldwin T, Calvo S, Chang YL, Decaprio D, Gale LR, Gnerre S, Goswami RS, Hammond-Kosack K, Harris LJ, Hilburn K, Kennell JC, Kroken S, Magnuson JK, Mannhaupt G, Mauceli E, Mewes HW, Mitterbauer R, Muehlbauer G, et al: The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science. 2007, 317: 1400-1402. 10.1126/science.1143708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowe RGT, Howlett BJ: Indifferent, affectionate, or deceitful: Lifestyles and secretomes of fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8: e1002515-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002515.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C: Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol. 2001, 313: 903-919. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang S, Lebrun MH, Farrall L, Valent B: Gain of virulence caused by insertion of a Pot3 transposon in a Magnaporthe grisea avirulence gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001, 14: 671-674. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.5.671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hane JK, Oliver RP: RIPCAL: a tool for alignment-based analysis of repeat-induced point mutations in fungal genomic sequences. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9: 478-10.1186/1471-2105-9-478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knogge W: Fungal Infection of Plants. Plant Cell. 1996, 8: 1711-1722.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaur S, Dhillon GS, Brar SK, Chauhan VB: Carbohydrate degrading enzyme production by plant pathogenic mycelia and microsclerotia isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina through koji fermentation. Ind Crop Prod. 2012, 36: 140-148. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.08.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez D, Larrondo LF, Putnam N, Gelpke MD, Huang K, Chapman J, Helfenbein KG, Ramaiya P, Detter JC, Larimer F, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Berka R, Cullen D, Rokhsar D: Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 695-700. 10.1038/nbt967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winnenburg R, Urban M, Beacham A, Baldwin TK, Holland S, Lindeberg M, Hansen H, Rawlings C, Hammond-Kosack KE, Kohler J: PHI-base update: additions to the pathogen host interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 572-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morschhauser J: Regulation of multidrug resistance in pathogenic fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010, 47: 94-106. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beck J, Ripka S, Siegner A, Schiltz E, Schweizer E: The multifunctional 6-methylsalicylic acid synthase gene of Penicillium patulum. Its gene structure relative to that of other polyketide synthases. Eur J Biochem. 1990, 192: 487-498. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19252.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kulkarni RD, Thon MR, Pan H, Dean RA: Novel G-protein-coupled receptor-like proteins in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genome Biol. 2005, 6: R24-10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solomon PS, Tan KC, Sanchez P, Cooper RM, Oliver RP: The disruption of a Galpha subunit sheds new light on the pathogenicity of Stagonospora nodorum on wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17: 456-466. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.5.456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li L, Wright SJ, Krystofova S, Park G, Borkovich KA: Heterotrimeric G protein signaling in filamentous fungi. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007, 61: 423-452. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fang W, St Leger RJ: Mrt, a gene unique to fungi, encodes an oligosaccharide transporter and facilitates rhizosphere competency in Metarhizium robertsii. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154: 1549-1557. 10.1104/pp.110.163014.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson DR: Cytochrome P450 and the individuality of species. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1999, 369: 1-10. 10.1006/abbi.1999.1352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maloney AP, VanEtten HD: A gene from the fungal plant pathogen Nectria haematococca that encodes the phytoalexin detoxifying enzyme pisatin demethylase defines a new cytochrome P450 family. Mol Gen Genet. 1994, 243: 506-514. 10.1007/BF00284198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suvarna K, Bartiss A, Wong B: Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase from Cryptococcus neoformans is a zinc-containing long-chain alcohol/polyol dehydrogenase. Microbiology. 2000, 146: 2705-2713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Duke SO, Vaughn KC: Lack of involvement of polyphenol oxidase in ortho-hydroxylation of phenolic compounds in mung bean seedlings. Physiol Plant. 1982, 54: 381-385. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb00696.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Okoro1 IO, Osagie A, Asibor EO: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of polyphenols from ethnomedicinal plants of Nigeria. African J Biotechnol. 2010, 9: 2989-2993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. John P, Morrissey , Osbourn AE: Fungal resistance to plant antibiotics as a mechanism of pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999, 63: 708-724.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolpert TJ, Dunkle LD, Ciuffetti LM: Host-selective toxins and avirulence determinants: what’s in a name?. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002, 40: 251-285. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.011402.114210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Oide S, Moeder W, Krasnoff S, Gibson D, Haas H, Yoshioka K, Turgeon BG: NPS6, encoding a nonribosomal peptide synthetase involved in siderophore-mediated iron metabolism, is a conserved virulence determinant of plant pathogenic ascomycetes. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 2836-2853. 10.1105/tpc.106.045633.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Panaccione DG, Scott-Craig JS, Pocard JA, Walton JD: A cyclic peptide synthetase gene required for pathogenicity of the fungus Cochliobolus carbonum on maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 6590-6594. 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6590.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Böhnert HU, Fudal I, Dioh W, Tharreau D, Notteghem JL, Lebrun MH: A putative polyketide synthase/peptide synthetase from Magnaporthe grisea signals pathogen attack to resistant rice. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2499-2513. 10.1105/tpc.104.022715.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gunde-Cimernam N, Zalar P, Hoog SD, Plemenitas A: Hypersaline waters in salterns – natural ecological niches for halophilic black yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000, 32: 235-240.

    Google Scholar 

  46. You MP, Colmer TD, Barbetti MJ: Salinity drives host reaction in Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) to Macrophomina phaseolina. Funct Plant Biol. 2011, 38: 984-992. 10.1071/FP11137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Herranz S, Rodríguez JM, Bussink HJ, Sánchez-Ferrero JC, Arst HN, Peñalva MA, Vincent O: Arrestin-related proteins mediate pH signaling in fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 12141-12146. 10.1073/pnas.0504776102.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Duran R, Cary JW, Calvo AM: Role of the osmotic stress regulatory pathway in morphogenesis and secondary metabolism in filamentous fungi. Toxins. 2010, 2: 367-381. 10.3390/toxins2040367.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dixon KP, Xu JR, Smirnoff N, Talbot NJ: Independent signaling pathways regulate cellular turgor during hyperosmotic stress and appressorium mediated plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 2045-2058.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gaulin E, Jauneau A, Villalba F, Rickauer M, Esquerré-Tugayé MT, Bottin A: The CBEL glycoprotein of Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae is involved in cell wall deposition and adhesion to cellulosic substrates. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 4565-4575. 10.1242/jcs.00138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Whiteford JR, Spanu PD: The hydrophobin HCf-1 of Cladosporium fulvum is required for efficient water-mediated dispersal of conidia. Fungal Genet Biol. 2001, 32: 159-168. 10.1006/fgbi.2001.1263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kwon YH, Hoch HC, Aist JR: Initiation of appressorium formation in Uromyces appendiculatus: organization of the apex and the responses involving microtubules and apical vesicles. Can J Bot. 1991, 69: 2560-2573. 10.1139/b91-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Choi W, Dean RA: The adenylate cyclase gene MAC1 of Magnaporthe grisea controls appressorium formation and other aspects of growth and development. Plant Cell. 1997, 9: 1973-1983.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu J-R, Hamer JE: MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 2696-706. 10.1101/gad.10.21.2696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tan DHS, Sigler L, Gibas CFC, Fong IW: Disseminated fungal infection in a renal transplant recipient involving M. phaseolina and Scytalidium dimidiatum: case report and review of taxonomic changes among medically important members of the Botryosphaeriaceae. Med Mycol. 2008, 46: 285-292. 10.1080/13693780701759658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ospina-Giraldo MD, Griffith JG, Laird EW, Mingora C: The CAZyome of Phytophthora spp.: A comprehensive analysis of the gene complement coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes in species of the genus Phytophthora. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 525-540. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-525.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Benčina M, Jakopič M, Friedrich J: High-molecular-weight genomic DNA isolation from Doratomyces microsporus and synthesis of a genomic DNA library. Acta Chim Slov. 2007, 54: 893-899.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Li Y, Wang W, Du X, Yuan Q: An improved RNA isolation method for filamentous fungus Blakeslea trispora rich in polysaccharides. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010, 160: 322-327. 10.1007/s12010-008-8289-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I: CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 1061-1067. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Mount SM, Wortman JR, Smith RK, Hannick LI, Maiti R, Ronning CM, Rusch DB, Town CD, Salzberg SL, White O: Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 5654-5666. 10.1093/nar/gkg770.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Stanke M, Waack S: Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 215-225. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL: TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 2878-2879. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen JE, Orvis J, White O, Buell CR, Wortman JR: Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: R7-10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Huang X, Adams MD, Zhou H, Kerlavage AR: A tool for analyzing and annotating genomic sequences. Genomics. 1997, 46: 37-45. 10.1006/geno.1997.4984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R: InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 847-848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 955-964.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lagesen K, Hallin PF, Rødland E, Stærfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW: RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 3100-3108. 10.1093/nar/gkm160.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL: Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R12-10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermanci P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R: antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acid Res. 2011, 39: 1-8. 10.1093/nar/gkq742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Katoh K, Toh H: Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9: 212-10.1186/1471-2105-9-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Castresana J: Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17: 540-552. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM: The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992, 8: 275-282.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5:Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28: 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kämper J, Kahmann R, Bölker M, Ma LJ, Brefort T, Saville BJ, Banuett F, Kronstad JW, Gold SE, Müller O, Perlin MH, Wösten HA, de Vries R, Ruiz-Herrera J, Reynaga-Peña CG, Snetselaar K, McCann M, Pérez-Martín J, Feldbrügge M, Basse CW, Steinberg G, Ibeas JI, Holloman W, Guzman P, Farman M, Stajich JE, Sentandreu R, González-Prieto JM, Kennell JC, Molina L, Schirawski J, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Greilinger D, Münch K, Rössel N, Scherer M, Vrane M, Ladendorf O, Vincon VV, Fuchs U, Sandrock B, Meng S, Ho ECH, Cahill MJ, Boyce KJ, Klose J, Klosterman SJ, Deelstra HJ, Ortiz-Castellanos L, Li W, Sanchez-Alonso P, Schreier PH, Häuser-Hahn I, Vaupel M, Koopmann E, Friedrich G, Voss H, Schlüter T, Margolis J, Platt D, Swimmer C, Gnirke A, Chen F, Vysotskaia V, Mannhaupt G, Güldener U, Münsterkötter M, Haase D, Oesterheld M, Mewes HW, Mauceli EW, DeCaprio D, Wade CM, Butler J, Young S, Jaffe DB, Calvo S, Nusbaum C, Galagan J, Birren BW: Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature. 2006, 444: 97-101. 10.1038/nature05248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gao Q, Jin K, Ying SH, Zhang Y, Xiao G, Shang Y, Duan Z, Hu X, Xie XQ, Zhou G, Peng G, Luo Z, Huang W, Wang B, Fang W, Wang S, Zhong Y, Ma LJ, St Leger RJ, Zhao GP, Pei Y, Feng MG, Xia Y, Wang C: Genome Sequencing and Comparative Transcriptomics of the Model Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and M. acridum. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1001264-10.1371/journal.pgen.1001264.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ispolatov I, Yuryev A, Mazo I, Maslov S: Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein–protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acid Res. 2005, 33: 3629-3635. 10.1093/nar/gki678.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. D’Souza DT, Tiwari R, Sah AK, Raghukumar C: Enhanced production of laccase by a marine fungus during treatment of colored effluent and synthetic dyes. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006, 38: 504-511. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Okino LK, Machado KMG, Fabric C, Bonomi VLR: Ligninolytic activity of tropical rainforest basidiomycetes. World J Microbiol Biotech. 2000, 16: 889-893. 10.1023/A:1008983616033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Archibald FS: A new assay for lignin-type peroxidases employing the dye azure B. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992, 58: 3110-3116.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Rasel Ahmed, Md. Amzad Hossain, and Md. Mursalin Khan for their initial help and Anton Yuryev from Ariadne Genomics, Elsevier Company for initial pathway reconstruction. We also thank Project Director, Basic and Applied Research on Jute project and Director General, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute Dr. Md. Kamal Uddin for his continuous support for the program. This research was funded by the Government of Bangladesh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Basic and Applied Research on Jute Project, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mia Avenue, Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh

    Md Shahidul Islam, Md Samiul Haque, Mohammad Moinul Islam, Emdadul Mannan Emdad, Abdul Halim, Quazi Md Mosaddeque Hossen, Md Zakir Hossain, Borhan Ahmed, Sifatur Rahim, Md Sharifur Rahman, Md Monjurul Alam & Maqsudul Alam

  2. Advanced Studies in Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, University of Hawaii, 2565 McCarthy Mall, Keller 319, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822, USA

    Shaobin Hou, Xuehua Wan & Maqsudul Alam

  3. Centre for Chemical Biology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia

    Jennifer A Saito

Authors
  1. Md Shahidul Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Md Samiul Haque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Moinul Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emdadul Mannan Emdad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdul Halim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Quazi Md Mosaddeque Hossen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Md Zakir Hossain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Borhan Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sifatur Rahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Md Sharifur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Md Monjurul Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shaobin Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xuehua Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jennifer A Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Maqsudul Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maqsudul Alam.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MA designed the study; MSI, MSH, MMI, EME, AH, QMMH, MZH, BA, SR, MSR, MMA, SH, and XW performed the experiments; MSI, MSH, MMI, EME, AH, QMMH, MZH, BA, SR, MSR, MMA, and MA analyzed the data; MSI, MSH, JAS, and MA wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12864_2012_4273_MOESM1_ESM.xls

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table S1 to Table S8. Table S1 provides the raw data generation statistics. Table S2 provides the assembly statistics of M. phaseolina genome. Table S3 provides the transcriptome assembly statistics. Table S4 lists the InterPro codes corresponding to the protein families in Table 2. Table S5 lists the virulence associated genes in M. phaseolina. Table S6 lists the transporter families in M. phaseolina. Table S7 details the M. phaseolina gene models corresponding to Figure 4. Table S8 details the M. phaseolina gene models corresponding to Figure 5. (XLS 208 KB)

12864_2012_4273_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Supplemental Figure S1 to Figure S11, supporting data analyses. Figure S1 indicates the number of unique and shared genes between M. phaseolina and F. oxysporum. Figure S2 shows the paralog network clusters of M. phaseolina. Figure S3 indicates the distribution of transposable elements over the genome. Figure S4 indicates the distribution of CAZymes against the 15 largest supercontigs of M. phaseolina. Figure S5 shows the positive guaiacol oxidation by M. phaseolina after 4 days of inoculation. Figures S6 to S11 show the PM profiles for various substrates. (PDF 2 MB)

12864_2012_4273_MOESM3_ESM.doc

Additional file 3: Supplemental methods. This file provides the full list of substrates assayed in the PM experiments. (DOC 70 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Islam, M.S., Haque, M.S., Islam, M.M. et al. Tools to kill: Genome of one of the most destructive plant pathogenic fungi Macrophomina phaseolina. BMC Genomics 13, 493 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-493

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-493

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us