Transcriptional pathways associated with the slow growth phenotype of transformed Anaplasma marginale

  • Sebastián Aguilar Pierlé1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Gena Kenitra Hammac1,

      Affiliated with

      • Guy H Palmer1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Kelly A Brayton1Email author

          Affiliated with

          BMC Genomics201314:272

          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-272

          Received: 30 January 2013

          Accepted: 26 March 2013

          Published: 22 April 2013

          Abstract

          Background

          The ability to genetically manipulate bacteria has been fundamentally important for both basic biological discovery and translational research to develop new vaccines and antibiotics. Experimental alteration of the genetic content of prokaryotic pathogens has revealed both expected functional relationships and unexpected phenotypic consequences. Slow growth phenotypes have been reported for multiple transformed bacterial species, including extracellular and intracellular pathogens. Understanding the genes and pathways responsible for the slow growth phenotype provides the opportunity to develop attenuated vaccines as well as bacteriostatic antibiotics. Transformed Anaplasma marginale, a rickettsial pathogen, exhibits slow growth in vitro and in vivo as compared to the parent wild type strain, providing the opportunity to identify the underlying genes and pathways associated with this phenotype.

          Results

          Whole genome transcriptional profiling allowed for identification of specific genes and pathways altered in transformed A. marginale. Genes found immediately upstream and downstream of the insertion site, including a four gene operon encoding key outer membrane proteins, were not differentially transcribed between wild type and transformed A. marginale. This lack of significant difference in transcription of flanking genes and the large size of the insert relative to the genome were consistent with a trans rather than a cis effect. Transcriptional profiling across the complete genome identified the most differentially transcribed genes, including an iron transporter, an RNA cleaving enzyme and several genes involved in translation. In order to confirm the trend seen in translation-related genes, K-means clustering and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were applied. These algorithms allowed evaluation of the behavior of genes as groups that share transcriptional status or biological function. Clustering and GSEA confirmed the initial observations and found additional pathways altered in transformed A. marginale. Three pathways were significantly altered as compared to the wild type: translation, translation elongation, and purine biosynthesis.

          Conclusions

          Identification of perturbed genes and networks through genome wide transcriptional profiling highlights the relevance of pathways such as nucleotide biosynthesis, translation, and translation elongation in the growth phenotype of obligate intracellular bacteria. These genes and pathways provide specific targets for development of slow growing attenuated vaccines and for bacteriostatic antibiotics.

          Keywords

          Intracellular bacteria Slow growth phenotype Global transcription Pathway analysis RNA-seq Rickettsiales Anaplasma

          Background

          The ability to genetically manipulate bacteria has been fundamentally important for both basic biological discovery and translational research to develop new vaccines and antibiotics. Experimental alteration of the genetic content of prokaryotic pathogens has revealed both expected functional relationships and unexpected phenotypic consequences. Slow growth phenotypes induced by transformation have been reported for both free living bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella[1, 2], as well as for facultative intracellular bacteria including Legionella and Listeria[3, 4]. Identifying the genes, pathways, and mechanisms that underlie slow growth phenotypes of transformed bacteria has the potential to provide new approaches for development of effective vaccines and antimicrobials. Bacteria that have a lower rate of replication in vivo can shift the race between onset of disease and development of an effective immune response in favor of the host, thus allowing development of attenuated vaccines that induce immunity without significant clinical disease. Correspondingly, several genetically altered pathogens have been tested as live vaccine candidates [57]. In addition, identification of genes and pathways underlying slow growth phenotypes can reveal targets for development of bacteriostatic antibiotics, drugs that slow replication to the point where the host responses can clear the infection.

          Despite the intriguing possibilities afforded by the slow growth phenotype, very little is known about the alterations that characterize this trait, especially in obligate intracellular pathogens where transformation technology has lagged behind that of bacteria capable of growing in cell-free media [8]. We have recently observed this growth phenotype in transformed Anaplasma marginale, the type species of the genus Anaplasma and a member of the Order Rickettsiales. Using a mariner transposon approach, A. marginale was transformed and genes encoding TurboGFP and spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance were inserted [9]. The in vitro and in vivo infectivity and stability, including transmission through the natural tick vector of A. marginale, has been established for the mutant (hereafter referred to as AmTR) [10]. Importantly, similar to wild type A. marginale, AmTR established infection in cattle, was transmitted by a competent arthropod vector species, and persisted in immune competent animals. However, AmTR not only required longer subculture intervals in ISE6 cells in vitro but had a clear slow growth phenotype in vivo as shown by the following observations as compared to wild-type A. marginale: i): calves infected with AmTR had longer prepatent periods prior to detectable bacteremia; ii) peak bacteremia levels were ten-fold lower; and iii) the bacterial levels in tick salivary glands were of 100-fold lower (103.41±0.25 versus 105.40±0.54) [10].

          In this study, A. marginale is used as a representative model of an obligate intracellular pathogen to describe the genetic and transcriptional changes that characterize the slow growth phenotype. As size [11, 12], genomic position [13] and codon usage [14] of an insert have been shown to affect the growth phenotype, these were analyzed for AmTR. Next, RNA-seq was used to identify transcriptional modifications that characterize the slow growth phenotype. For this, the transcriptional profiles of wild-type and AmTR were examined, providing a comparative steady-state snapshot of specific mRNA abundance. This comparison included both local and global analysis. For the former, the transcriptional status of genes flanking the insertion site in AmTR was analyzed. For the latter, whole genome transcriptional profiling was used to identify genes that were significantly differentially transcribed. Finally, clustering methods and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis were used to evaluate the behavior of groups of genes and pathways. Herein we report the results of these analyses and present the results in the context of the mechanisms that underlie the slow growth phenotype.

          Methods

          Insert analysis

          The OPTIMIZER web server was used to perform predictions and adjustments in codon usage for the insert present in AmTR [15]. The ‘one amino acid–one codon’ method, a guided random method based on a Monte Carlo algorithm, was used. The A. marginale str. St. Maries codon usage table was extracted from Artemis [16].

          Cell culture and RNA-seq

          The accession number for this RNA-seq study is: SRP014580. Three T75 flasks of ISE6 cells were infected with either wild type A. marginale or AmTR, representing three biological replicates. Both inoculums were originally derived from the St. Maries strain of A. marginale. The cell lines were maintained in ISE6 cells cultured at 34°C as previously described [9, 17, 18]. When passage 27 of either wild type or AmTR in a T75 cell culture flask infected greater than 80% of ISE6 cells, as determined by examination of Giemsa stained cytospin preparations, cell cultures were mechanically lysed by passaging 50 times through a bent 27 g needle attached to a 6 mL luer lock syringe, then filtered through a 2 μm syringe filter (Whatman) which allows passage of A. marginale but not cellular debris. The filtrate was pelleted by centrifugation, and then washed in PBS. The final pellet was resuspended in 200 μL PBS before adding 1 mL of TRIzol (Invitrogen). Total RNA was isolated from wild type or AmTR-infected ISE6 cell culture using TRIzol (Invitrogen), per manufacturer directions. Eukaryotic sequences were negatively selected through hybridization using the MICROBEnrich kit (Ambion). The Duplex‒Specific thermostable Nuclease (DSN) normalization protocol was applied to all samples. Samples were sequenced with Illumina technology with 100 bp reads, each sample was run on 1/3 of a lane. Data was processed using CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC Bio). Mapping parameters were adjusted to map a maximum number of reads to the reference bacterial genomes. The distribution of the expression values for all samples was analyzed and compared. Normalization by quantiles was applied to adjust the distributions for further comparison. Fold changes with respect to RPKM values were calculated [19]. Two different tests were applied to evaluate the statistical significance of fold changes: Kal and Baggerly’s statistical tests on proportions [20, 21].

          Comparative transcriptional analysis

          Expression was measured using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) using the SYBR Green ER RT-PCR Kit (Invitrogen). Briefly, 200 ng of RNA were processed with the SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) to obtain cDNA. The steady state, single copy gene msp5 was used to calibrate the qPCR. Relative expression ratios were calculated by a mathematical model, which includes efficiency correction of individual transcripts through the REST software [22] with modifications as previously described [23]. This procedure was used for verification of transcriptional differences found by RNA-seq. The variance of the normalized expression values of the genes flanking the insert was evaluated through ANOVA paired with an F-test.

          K-means clustering

          We used K-means clustering to assign the mean transcriptional value of each gene to the cluster whose center is nearest. Lloyd’s algorithm was used for these experiments [24]. Euclidean distance was used as distance metric; five partitions were used to generate the clusters. For each gene, the mean gene expression value over all input samples was subtracted. Normalized expression values were used for clustering.

          Gene Set enrichment analysis

          The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) test described by Tian et al. [25] was used. Briefly, the test implicitly calculates and uses ANOVA statistic for multiple group experiments for each feature, as measures of association. For each category, the test statistics for the features in that category are summed and a category based test statistic is calculated as this sum divided by the square root of the number of features in the category. In order to annotate the A. marginale genome with Gene Ontology we used the Comprehensive Microbial Resource [26]. Briefly, we matched feature IDs in the A. marginale genome to synonyms and gene product form IDs from the Comprehensive Microbial Resource. Additionally, we complemented this source with manual curation of the annotation file, including genes reported in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) [27].

          Results/discussion

          Insert characteristics

          The nature of the construct used for transformation can be a source for phenotypic alterations. The effect of insert size on bacterial fitness (measured by growth rate), has been previously shown for bacteria with intermediate genome sizes [11, 12]. Inserts that ranged from 2.9 to 12.6 kb were used to transform either E. coli or Bacillus subtilis. In both studies, bacteria transformed using the largest inserts displayed slower growth rates. These larger inserts represent a small proportion of the chromosome they are inserted in: 0.2 and 0.3% of the total genome size in E. coli and B. subitlis, respectively. The insert used for transformation of A. marginale represents 0.4% of its single chromosome. Obligate intracellular pathogens in the Rickettsia and Coxiella genera have been transformed with inserts that vary in size, ranging from 0.001 to 0.5% of their chromosomes [2830]. As these transformants displayed different growth phenotypes, an association between insert size and slow growth seems unlikely.

          Foreign genes and their unfamiliar codon usage can affect bacteria through slow translation efficiency, difficultly folding the foreign protein, and protein degradation [31, 32]. The issue of codon usage is highlighted for bacteria with unusual genomic G + C content, such as the obligate intracellular pathogens in the order Rickettsiales[33, 34]. In order to analyze the relationship of the insert codon usage with that of A. marginale, we used OPTIMIZER, a web server that optimizes a DNA sequence using pre-computed codon usage tables [15]. Comparison of the insert with the recipient A. marginale revealed a Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) of 0.802. CAI values range from 0, when the codon usage of a sequence and that of the reference set are very different, to 1 when both codon usages are the same. These results suggest that codon usage is an unlikely explanation for reduced growth rate in AmTR.

          Whole genome transcriptional profiling

          RNA-seq was used to compare whole genome transcriptional profiles of wild type and AmTR. This allowed for identification of individual genes whose transcriptional status segregates with the phenotype of interest. As obligate intracellular pathogens are dependent on their eukaryotic host cells, RNA samples are significantly contaminated by host transcripts. Illumina technology and selective hybridization allowed us to obtain sufficient depth to compare the transcriptomes of wild type and AmTR (Table  1). The number of reads mapped to the A. marginale genome ranged from 1,667,455 to 9,895,940, with AmTR providing fewer reads than wild type despite being harvested from cultures with similar levels of infection.
          Table 1

          Reads mapped to the A. marginale St. Maries genome

          Replicate

          Total reads

          A. marginalereads

          % of reads mapped toA. marginale

          Average matched read length

          AmTR1

          59,342,223

          1,667,455

          2.8

          100

          AmTR2

          54,170,723

          1,816,895

          3.4

          100

          AmTR3

          76,734,051

          2,474,678

          3.2

          100

          WT1

          62,196,873

          8,494,596

          13.7

          100

          WT2

          65,911,848

          8,220,811

          12.5

          100

          WT3

          103,604,396

          9,895,940

          9.5

          100

          AmTR: transformed, slow growth phenotype A. marginale.

          WT: wild type A. marginale.

          As genomic location has been identified as a source for phenotypic variation in transformed bacteria, the initial focus was on genes flanking the insert [13]. Integration of the 4.5-kb insert in AmTR occurred between the putative transcriptional regulator, tr and ndk at nucleotide position 1026363. The insertion site is immediately upstream to the major surface protein 2 (msp2) operon; the operon encodes four outer membrane proteins, OpAG1-3 and MSP2 [35]. Although modulation of the outer membrane has been shown to affect bacterial metabolism and growth [36], comparison of normalized expression values (RPKM) of the operon transcripts between the AmTR and the wild type (Table  2) through ANOVA paired with an F-test showed no significant difference (p = 0.99). We extended the analysis to an additional 14 genes flanking the insert; there was also no significant difference between AmTR and the wild type (p = 0.94).
          Table 2

          Transcriptional status of genes flanking the insertion site of AmTR

           

          Normalized RPKM values*

          Feature ID

          AmTR

          WT

          czcD

          291

          2079

          ccmB

          374

          245

          dksA

          379

          779

          dtbS

          570

          57

          ftsY

          400

          191

          icd

          256

          843

          recJ

          185

          55

          AM1135

          61

          11

          pcnB

          1407

          185

          ndk

          2803

          1119

          AM1138

          2878

          3841

          omp1

          2523

          1375

          opag3

          1073

          193

          opag2

          317

          531

          opag1

          385

          346

          msp2

          239

          1170

          AM1145

          177

          1357

          AM1146

          157

          413

          AM1148

          120

          112

          orfX

          55

          45

          *AmTR: transformed; A. marginale WT: wild type A. marginale.

          Since the genes immediately adjacent to the insertion site were not significantly altered, we next identified the most differentially transcribed genes across all replicates. The top ten down and up regulated genes are shown in Figure  1. These genes were all significantly differentially transcribed (p < 1E-05) (Additional file 1 & Figure  1). Four of the top differentially transcribed genes (AM360, AM357, rnhB and fpba), one of the genes flanking the insertion site (ndk) and a gene involved in translation (rpmE) were evaluated with qPCR to validate the RNA-seq data (Additional file 2).
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-272/MediaObjects/12864_2013_4977_Fig1_HTML.jpg
          Figure 1

          Fold change in AmTR compared to wild type. Locus tags for all genes are given on the X axis. The top 20 differentially transcribed genes identified across two replicates and two statistical tests and their fold changes are shown. All fold changes were found to be statistically significant at p < 5.05E-5 across both statistical tests.

          The RNA-seq analysis revealed genes that were significantly differentially transcribed, including genes with predicted functions, such as rnhB, fpba, tRNA-Phe-1, xerD, guaB, purL, dnaE, tRNA-Arg-3 and tRNA-Ser-3. Gene rnhB, which encodes RNase H, an enzyme that specifically cleaves the RNA strand of RNA/DNA hybrids and plays a role in removing RNA primers from Okazaki fragments [37], was significantly down regulated in AmTR. Although it is known that this gene is dispensable in several bacterial models, knockout mutants of rnhB show growth rates that are about half of that of the wild type [38]. Another gene with predicted function that was found to be significantly down regulated in AmTR was fpba, which encodes an iron binding protein. The most common strategy of iron acquisition in bacteria is the production of high-affinity ferric iron binding molecules that can sequester iron from the host’s iron-binding proteins. Knock-out of iron acquisition mechanisms has been shown to attenuate pathogenic bacteria and impair their growth [39, 40]. One example of this can be found in Streptococcus pyogenes, where inactivation of an iron transporter affected growth in vivo[41]. The transcriptional status of fpba and rnhB, together with evidence for reduced growth in other bacterial pathogens with impaired iron transport systems or RNase H enzymes, is consistent with the phenotype exhibited by AmTR.

          Differentially transcribed groups of genes and pathways

          Most phenotypes are the result of more complex genetic changes than divergence at a single gene or locus, or even a few loci [42]. Evaluation of the transcriptional status of groups of genes revealed that genes involved in translation exhibited a trend: of 61 genes, 50 were found to be significantly down regulated in AmTR (Additional file 3). A first step toward addressing the challenge of statistically evaluating genes as groups is the use of clustering techniques. We used K-means clustering in order to validate a trend we were able to identify through observation and find further relationships. Most genes (882) fell into Cluster 1, which is comprised of genes that were either slightly up or down regulated between wild type and AmTR (Figure  2 & Additional file 1). The second cluster included 34 genes that were clearly down regulated in AmTR. Twenty of these genes are involved in translation and translation elongation. Cluster 3 included three genes that were down regulated in AmTR. The difference in average expression values for these genes was much greater than the differences seen in Cluster 2. This cluster included an additional two genes involved in translation. Cluster 4 incorporated two genes that were significantly up regulated in AmTR: AM291 and guaB. Finally, Cluster 5 included 31 genes that were significantly up regulated in AmTR. This cluster included genes involved in translation as well as nucleotide biosynthetic pathways: carB, purL and pyrG.
          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-272/MediaObjects/12864_2013_4977_Fig2_HTML.jpg
          Figure 2

          Clusters identified through k-means clustering of AmTR versus wild type. The 5 clusters identified in this study are displayed. The Y axis shows normalized expression values (RPKM). The X axis displays the values found for wild type (WT) and AmTR. Each colored line represents a different gene included in the cluster. The mean gene expression value over all input samples was subtracted to each gene’s value. Cluster affiliation for each gene can be found in Additional file 1.

          Clusters 2 and 3 were of particular interest as they identified genes that were down regulated in AmTR compared to wild type. A large proportion (45%) of the genes involved in translation and translation elongation were included in these two clusters, validating our observation. Interestingly, it has been previously shown that mutations and transcriptional alterations in genes involved in translation provoke slow growth of E. coli[43], and three of these, rpoB, rpsL and rpsE, were also found to be altered in AmTR.

          Although the effect on genes involved in translation seems clear, the main difficulty in analysis lies not in the identification of differentially expressed genes but in the interpretation of how these may interact. The problem is compounded when genes within a given pathway have only moderate changes in transcription that are not captured by the examination of only the most highly regulated genes. This appears to hold true for the translation related genes evaluated in this study. Although a trend was clear in this pathway, genes with small differences in transcriptional activity did not cluster with the most differentially regulated ones. In order to accurately identify perturbed pathways the technique used should consider the distribution of pathway genes in the entire list of genes as well as adjust for the correlation structure [44, 45]. Consequently, we applied GSEA to our whole genome transcriptional profiling data. This analysis grouped over 500 genes into 165 different Gene Ontology categories. Eleven pathways were significantly affected transcriptionally (p < 0.05) (Additional file 4 & Table  3). Three specific pathways, translation, translation elongation, and purine biosynthesis were the most impacted (p < 0.001) (Table  3). GSEA confirmed our observations and identified additional pathways that were affected in AmTR. It is not surprising to find that both translation and translation elongation pathways were altered, as it has been shown that reduced translation-transcription coupling impacts the overall transcription and translation elongation rate [46].
          Table 3

          Significantly affected pathways in wild type vs. AmTR comparison through GSEA

          GO Category

          Description

          Lower tail*

          Upper tail*

          6412

          Translation (PMID:16482227 [ISS] Pfam:PF00573)

          0.0044

          0.9956

          6414

          Translational elongation (PMID:16482227 [ISS] Pfam:PF00889)

          0.0071

          0.9929

          15940

          Pantothenate biosynthetic process (PMID:12721629 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR00018)

          0.0158

          0.9842

          6434

          Seryl-tRNA aminoacylation (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR00414)

          0.0322

          0.9678

          15986

          ATP synthesis coupled proton transport (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR01216)

          0.0343

          0.966

          8654

          Phospholipid biosynthetic process (PMID:12721629 [ISS] Swiss-Prot:O31752)

          0.0343

          0.9657

          19363

          Pyridine nucleotide biosynthetic process (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR00550)

          0.0381

          0.9619

          6265

          DNA topological change (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR01051)

          0.9648

          0.0352

          6364

          rRNA processing (GO_REF:0000012 [ISS] Swiss-Prot:P21513)

          0.9673

          0.0327

          917

          Barrier septum formation (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR00172)

          0.9899

          0.0101

          9152

          Purine ribonucleotide biosynthetic process (PMID:16482227 [ISS] TIGR_TIGRFAMS:TIGR00184)

          0.9997

          0.0003

          *Lower/Upper tail: The different pathways evaluated in through GSEA are shown. Lower and Upper tail values show the mass in the permutation based p-value distribution below or above the value of the test statistic.

          Additionally GSEA allowed for identification of other significantly altered pathways such as purine biosynthesis. This is consistent with the finding that two genes involved in the purine biosynthesis pathway are among the top differentially transcribed genes: guaB and purL. Several previous reports have described the importance of nucleotide biosynthesis in bacteria. For instance, certain auxotroph mutants of Salmonella[47], Staphylococcus aureus[48] and Steptococcus pneumoniae[49] have shown impaired growth. These studies suggest that purines and selected amino acids are scarce in different environments and essential to pathogen growth. Impairment in nucleotide biosynthesis would further underlie the slow growth phenotype.

          Conclusions

          Understanding the basis for the slow growth phenotypes of transformed bacteria provides targets for development of attenuated vaccines and bacteriostatic antibiotics. For the Anaplasma marginale transformant, AmTR, the slow growth phenotype is specifically relevant as it is manifest both in the mammalian host and the arthropod vector, expanding the opportunities for blocking transmission and disease. The AmTR slow growth phenotype results from a trans effect of the insertion and is consistent and is likely to be independent from the impact of a relatively large insert:genome ratio. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis identified individual genes such as fpba and rnhB, which were transcribed at significantly lower levels in AmTR as compared to wild type and encode functions consistent with reduced bacterial growth. The application of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and clustering analysis to the large data sets generated in this study revealed significant transcriptional alterations in three pathways: translation, translation elongation and purine biosynthesis. Identification of these perturbed networks highlights the relevance of sequential relatively minor changes in individual genes of a pathway, which collectively have a pronounced phenotypic effect. This understanding moves beyond a one gene-one phenotype model and can accelerate translation of discovery into improved infection control.

          Abbreviations

          AmTR: 

          Transformed A. marginale

          RPKM: 

          Reads Per Kilobase per Million mapped reads

          GSEA: 

          Genes Set Enrichment Analysis

          KEGG: 

          Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

          CAI: 

          Codon Adaptation Index

          Declarations

          Acknowledgements

          The authors would like to acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Ms. Xiaoya Cheng. This work was supported by USDA CREES NRI CGP 2004-35600-14175 and 2005-35604-15440, National Institutes of Health Grant AI44005, and Wellcome Trust GR075800M. SAP was supported in part by fellowships from the Poncin Trust and CONACyT.

          Authors’ Affiliations

          (1)
          Program in Genomics, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University

          References

          1. Oscar TP, Dulal K, Boucaud D: Transformation of Escherichia coli K-12 with a high-copy plasmid encoding the green fluorescent protein reduces growth: implications for predictive microbiology. J Food Prot 2006,69(2):276–281.PubMed
          2. Oscar TP: Comparison of predictive models for growth of parent and green fluorescent protein-producing strains of Salmonella . J Food Prot 2003,66(2):200–207.PubMed
          3. Joseph B, Przybilla K, Stuhler C, Schauer K, Slaghuis J, Fuchs TM, Goebel W: Identification of Listeria monocytogenes genes contributing to intracellular replication by expression profiling and mutant screening. J Bacteriol 2006,188(2):556–568.PubMedView Article
          4. Krinos C, High AS, Rodgers FG: Role of the 25 kDa major outer membrane protein of Legionella pneumophila in attachment to U-937 cells and its potential as a virulence factor for chick embryos. J Appl Microbiol 1999,86(2):237–244.PubMedView Article
          5. Bumann D, Hueck C, Aebischer T, Meyer TF: Recombinant live Salmonella spp. for human vaccination against heterologous pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2000,27(4):357–364.PubMedView Article
          6. He Y, Xu T, Fossheim LE, Zhang XH: FliC, a flagellin protein, is essential for the growth and virulence of fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda . PLoS One 2012,7(9):e45070.PubMedView Article
          7. Simmons CP, Hodgson AL, Strugnell RA: Attenuation and vaccine potential of aroQ mutants of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis . Infect Immun 1997,65(8):3048–3056.PubMed
          8. Beare PA, Sandoz KM, Omsland A, Rockey DD, Heinzen RA: Advances in genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 2011, 2:97.PubMedView Article
          9. Felsheim RF, Chavez AS, Palmer GH, Crosby L, Barbet AF, Kurtti TJ, Munderloh UG: Transformation of Anaplasma marginale . Vet Parasitol 2010,167(2–4):167–174.PubMedView Article
          10. Noh SM, Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Munderloh UG, Felsheim RF, Brayton KA: Stability and tick transmission phenotype of gfp-transformed Anaplasma marginale through a complete in vivo infection cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011,77(1):330–334.PubMedView Article
          11. Ohse M, Takahashi K, Kadowaki Y, Kusaoke H: Effects of plasmid DNA sizes and several other factors on transformation of Bacillus subtilis ISW1214 with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1995,59(8):1433–1437.PubMedView Article
          12. Smith MA, Bidochka MJ: Bacterial fitness and plasmid loss: the importance of culture conditions and plasmid size. Can J Microbiol 1998,44(4):351–355.PubMedView Article
          13. Cooper S, Helmstetter CE: Chromosome replication and the division cycle of Escherichia coli B/r. J Mol Biol 1968,31(3):519–540.PubMedView Article
          14. Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J: Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol 2004,22(7):346–353.PubMedView Article
          15. Puigbo P, Guzman E, Romeu A, Garcia-Vallve S: OPTIMIZER: a web server for optimizing the codon usage of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2007,35(Web Server issue):W126-W131.PubMedView Article
          16. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B: Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2000,16(10):944–945.View Article
          17. Munderloh UG, Blouin EF, Kocan KM, Ge NL, Edwards WL, Kurtti TJ: Establishment of the tick ( Acari:Ixodidae )-borne cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale ( Rickettsiales:Anaplasmataceae ) in tick cell culture. J Med Entomol 1996,33(4):656–664.PubMed
          18. Munderloh UG, Liu Y, Wang M, Chen C, Kurtti TJ: Establishment, maintenance and description of cell lines from the tick Ixodes scapularis . J Parasitol 1994,80(4):533–543.PubMedView Article
          19. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 2008,5(7):621–628.PubMedView Article
          20. Baggerly KA, Deng L, Morris JS, Aldaz CM: Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2003,19(12):1477–1483.View Article
          21. Kal AJ, van Zonneveld AJ, Benes V, van den Berg M, Koerkamp MG, Albermann K, Strack N, Ruijter JM, Richter A, Dujon B: Dynamics of gene expression revealed by comparison of serial analysis of gene expression transcript profiles from yeast grown on two different carbon sources. Mol Biol Cell 1999,10(6):1859–1872.PubMed
          22. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L: Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2002,30(9):e36.PubMedView Article
          23. Pierle SA, Dark MJ, Dahmen D, Palmer GH, Brayton KA: Comparative genomics and transcriptomics of trait-gene association. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:669.PubMedView Article
          24. Lloyd S: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1982,28(2):129–137.View Article
          25. Tian L, Greenberg SA, Kong SW, Altschuler J, Kohane IS, Park PJ: Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005,102(38):13544–13549.PubMedView Article
          26. Davidsen T, Beck E, Ganapathy A, Montgomery R, Zafar N, Yang Q, Madupu R, Goetz P, Galinsky K, White O: The comprehensive microbial resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2010,38(Database issue):D340-D345.PubMedView Article
          27. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M: KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 2012,40(Database issue):D109-D114.PubMedView Article
          28. Baldridge GD, Burkhardt N, Herron MJ, Kurtti TJ, Munderloh UG: Analysis of fluorescent protein expression in transformants of Rickettsia monacensis , an obligate intracellular tick symbiont. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005,71(4):2095–2105.PubMedView Article
          29. Beare PA, Howe D, Cockrell DC, Omsland A, Hansen B, Heinzen RA: Characterization of a Coxiella burnetii ftsZ mutant generated by Himar1 transposon mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 2009,191(5):1369–1381.PubMedView Article
          30. Rachek LI, Tucker AM, Winkler HH, Wood DO: Transformation of Rickettsia prowazekii to rifampin resistance. J Bacteriol 1998,180(8):2118–2124.PubMed
          31. Olins PO, Lee SC: Recent advances in heterologous gene expression in Escherichia coli . Curr Opin Biotechnol 1993,4(5):520–525.PubMedView Article
          32. Jonasson P, Liljeqvist S, Nygren PA, Stahl S: Genetic design for facilitated production and recovery of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli . Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2002,35(Pt 2):91–105.PubMedView Article
          33. Brayton KA, Kappmeyer LS, Herndon DR, Dark MJ, Tibbals DL, Palmer GH, McGuire TC, Knowles DP Jr: Complete genome sequencing of Anaplasma marginale reveals that the surface is skewed to two superfamilies of outer membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005,102(3):844–849.PubMedView Article
          34. Qin A, Tucker AM, Hines A, Wood DO: Transposon mutagenesis of the obligate intracellular pathogen Rickettsia prowazekii . Appl Environ Microbiol 2004,70(5):2816–2822.PubMedView Article
          35. Lohr CV, Brayton KA, Shkap V, Molad T, Barbet AF, Brown WC, Palmer GH: Expression of Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 2 operon-associated proteins during mammalian and arthropod infection. Infect Immun 2002,70(11):6005–6012.PubMedView Article
          36. Winther T, Xu L, Berg-Sorensen K, Brown S, Oddershede LB: Effect of energy metabolism on protein motility in the bacterial outer membrane. Biophys J 2009,97(5):1305–1312.PubMedView Article
          37. Ogawa T, Okazaki T: Function of RNase H in DNA replication revealed by RNase H defective mutants of Escherichia coli . Mol Gen Genet 1984,193(2):231–237.PubMedView Article
          38. Fukushima S, Itaya M, Kato H, Ogasawara N, Yoshikawa H: Reassessment of the in vivo functions of DNA polymerase I and RNase H in bacterial cell growth. J Bacteriol 2007,189(23):8575–8583.PubMedView Article
          39. Lawlor MS, O'Connor C, Miller VL: Yersiniabactin is a virulence factor for Klebsiella pneumoniae during pulmonary infection. Infect Immun 2007,75(3):1463–1472.PubMedView Article
          40. Torres AG, Redford P, Welch RA, Payne SM: TonB-dependent systems of uropathogenic Escherichia coli : aerobactin and heme transport and TonB are required for virulence in the mouse. Infect Immun 2001,69(10):6179–6185.PubMedView Article
          41. Janulczyk R, Ricci S, Bjorck L: MtsABC is important for manganese and iron transport, oxidative stress resistance, and virulence of Streptococcus pyogenes . Infect Immun 2003,71(5):2656–2664.PubMedView Article
          42. White KP: Functional genomics and the study of development, variation and evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2001,2(7):528–537.PubMedView Article
          43. Ruusala T, Andersson D, Ehrenberg M, Kurland CG: Hyper-accurate ribosomes inhibit growth. EMBO J 1984,3(11):2575–2580.PubMed
          44. Breitling R, Amtmann A, Herzyk P: Iterative Group Analysis (iGA): a simple tool to enhance sensitivity and facilitate interpretation of microarray experiments. BMC Bioinforma 2004, 5:34.View Article
          45. Rahnenfuhrer J, Domingues FS, Maydt J, Lengauer T: Calculating the statistical significance of changes in pathway activity from gene expression data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:Article16.PubMed
          46. Proshkin S, Rahmouni AR, Mironov A, Nudler E: Cooperation between translating ribosomes and RNA polymerase in transcription elongation. Science (New York, NY) 2010,328(5977):504–508.View Article
          47. McFarland WC, Stocker BA: Effect of different purine auxotrophic mutations on mouse-virulence of a Vi-positive strain of Salmonella dublin and of two strains of Salmonella typhimurium . Microb Pathog 1987,3(2):129–141.PubMedView Article
          48. Mei JM, Nourbakhsh F, Ford CW, Holden DW: Identification of Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes in a murine model of bacteraemia using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 1997,26(2):399–407.PubMedView Article
          49. Polissi A, Pontiggia A, Feger G, Altieri M, Mottl H, Ferrari L, Simon D: Large-scale identification of virulence genes from Streptococcus pneumoniae . Infect Immun 1998,66(12):5620–5629.PubMed

          Copyright

          © Pierlé et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          Advertisement