Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison to other genomic display tools

From: ContigScape: a Cytoscape plugin facilitating microbial genome gap closing

Program

Main display

Connections between contigs

Connections between scaffolds

Compatible assemblers

Objects

Global contig display

The weight of contigs’ relationship

Type

Consed

Linear

From paired reads

No

Any producing ACE files

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Gordon et al., [5])

Phrapview

Linear

From paired reads

No

Phrap

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Gordon et al., [5])

Gap5

Linear

No

No

All

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Bonfield et al., [12])

UCSC

Linear

No

No

No

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Kent et al., [13])

Ensembl

Linear

No

No

No

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Stalker et al., [14])

IGV

Linear

No

No

All

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Robinson et al., [15])

EagleView

Linear

No

No

Any producing ACE files

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Huang, Marth [16])

Hawkeye

Linear

From paired reads viewed within a single scaffold

No

Any producing AFG files

nonselective

No

No

stand-alone

(Schatz et al., [17])

ABySS-Explorer

Graphs

From paired reads

No

ABySS

nonselective

One node

No

stand-alone

(Nielsen et al., [9])

TGNet

Graphs

From transcripts, From scaffolding information

From transcripts

All

eukaryocyte

One node

No

Perl scripts

(Oksana et al., [10])

ContigScape

Graphs

From reference, From scaffolding information, 454 repeat reads or other database

From reference, From other database

All

Fungi,,bacteria, plasmid, virus etc.

One edge and two nodes

display

plugin

(the publication)

       Â