Differential gene expression in the endometrium on gestation day 12 provides insight into sow prolificacy
- Hao Zhang†1,
- Shouqi Wang†1,
- Manqing Liu1,
- Ailing Zhang1,
- Zhenfang Wu1,
- Zhe Zhang1 and
- Jiaqi Li1Email author
© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 January 2012
Accepted: 14 January 2013
Published: 22 January 2013
Erhualian pigs, one of Chinese Taihu pig breeds, are known to have the largest recorded litter size in the world. A lower prenatal death rate is the major contributing factor to the prolificacy of Taihu pigs. Cross-breeding experiments have demonstrated that Taihu sows exhibit a strong maternal effect and that their large litter sizes are mainly caused by maternal genes. The growth and development of porcine embryos on gestation day (GD) 12 are dependent on histotroph secreted by endometrium. Embryonic loss of Taihu pigs on GD12 is lower than that of Western pigs. Here, endometrial samples were collected from pregnant Erhualian sows (parity 3) and Landrace × Large White (LL) sows (parity 3) on GD12. Digital gene expression profiling (DGE) was used to measure the gene expression in the endometrium of the two breeds.
A total of 13,612 genes were differentially expressed between the two breeds (P < 0.001, FDR < 0.001). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that the differential genes involved in reproduction and growth. Pathway analysis revealed that the differentially expressed genes significantly enriched in 24 KEGG pathways. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR confirmed the differential expression of eight genes. Analyses of the differentially expressed genes suggested possible reasons for the difference in embryonic survival ratio between the two breeds. Specifically, these findings point to a higher ratio of PGE2:PGF2α in the endometrium of Erhualian pigs, which facilitates the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. We also suggest that the differences in the uterine environment lead to higher uterine capacity in Erhualian pigs.
The DGE expression profiles of Erhualian and LL endometrium demonstrated differential expression of genes. Our results will increase understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the low rate of embryonic loss in Chinese Taihu pigs, facilitate the identification of major genes that affect litter size, and be valuable for porcine transcriptomic studies.
Chinese Taihu pigs are highly prolific; the Erhualian (ER), one of the Taihu pigs, is known for producing the highest recorded litter sizes in the world . Litter size is influenced by many factors, such as the boar, season, and nutrition. However, it has been demonstrated that these factors do not account for the prolificacy of Meishan pigs, which are another breed of Chinese Taihu pig . In addition, Meishan sows are little affected by the factors involved in stillbirth . Taihu pigs express a high level of maternal heterosis in litter size when used in crosses with Western pig breeds [4, 5]. Studies have indicated that the large litter sizes of Meishan pigs are due to genes acting in the dam [6, 7]. The ER sows can give birth to more than 15 piglets per litter, even when the coefficient of inbreeding is as high as 0.25 . These findings indicate that the desirable alleles related to litter size are preponderant in Taihu sows.
Embryonic loss is one of the major barriers to large litter size [2, 9]. It is estimated that approximately 20-30% of embryonic death occurs during gestation days (GD) 11–12 . The embryonic survival rate does not differ among pig breeds until GD11, but it is elevated on GD12 in Meishan pigs when compared with Landrace × Large Yorkshire (LL) pigs [7, 11]. At this stage, the blastocysts undergo dramatic morphological changes, developing from an 11–50 mm tubular structure into a 100 mm filamentous structure. The rapid changes in shape and size caused by the elongation of porcine blastocysts are not a result of cellular hyperplasis but cellular rearrangements and remodeling of the trophectoderm . These changes coincide with the synthesis and release of maternal-fetal recognition signals (estrogen) and cytokines required for the establishment of pregnancy [13–15]. Porcine conceptuses initiate the secretion of estrogen on GD10-15 , although Meishan embryos are smaller and contain fewer cells when they initiate steroidogenesis and begin to elongate . Meishan conceptuses also secrete less estrogen into the uterine luminal fluid and elongate to a reduced length  and diameter [17, 19] when compared with Large White conceptuses.
The level of estrogen in porcine uterine flush samples is determined primarily by the amount of estrogen secreted by the embryos . The estrogen level in the uterine lumen will have multiple effects on the embryonic survival rate. Firstly, the estrogen level may affect placental weight and survival of the conceptus. When Meishan gilts were treated with estrogen on GD12 or GD13, placental weights were increased significantly (P < 0.05); litter size was not affected significantly (P > 0.05) but it tended to decrease . However, others have shown that placental weights are negatively correlated with litter size (P < 0.05)  and uterine capacity at GD105  (P < 0.01) in Western breeds. The non-significant result in the former study  may have been a consequence of smaller sample size. Secondly, embryonic estrogen, as an embryo-maternal recognition signal, can change uterine secretion of histotroph . The lower amount in Meishan embryos may cause a more gradual change of the gravid uteri, which decreases the negative impact that faster-developing embryos could have on their slower-developing littermate embryos [25, 26].
Endometrial synthesis of prostaglandins (PG) is essential for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in pigs [27, 28]. During maternal recognition of pregnancy around GD12, PGF2α, which is synthesized mainly by the endometrium , has a luteolytic effect, while PGE2 can antagonize this effect [29, 30]. The secretion of PGF2α is redirected from the uterine venous drainage (endocrine) during luteolysis to the uterine lumen (exocrine) at the time of maternal recognition of pregnancy. Studies have shown that the PGE2:PGF2α ratio is crucial for the regulation of the estrous cycle, and the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy [31, 32]. The sum of PGE2 and PGF2α and their ratio were higher in Meishan sows than that in Large White pigs .
On GD12, the placenta (trophectoderm) has not yet formed, the conceptus is free-floating and not attached to the endometrium [10, 12], hence embryonic growth and development is dependent on histotroph in the uterine lumen. Histotroph includes hormones, growth factors, and transport proteins . The uterine histotroph is synthesized and secreted primarily by the epithelia of the maternal uteri during early pregnancy . Experiments have demonstrated that embryonic growth and development are affected by the environment of the uterine lumen [18, 36]. In the present study, we detected the differentially expressed genes in the endometrium of ER and LL pigs on GD12 by digital gene expression profiling (DGE) using an Illumina Genome Analyzer platform. This work will be helpful for understanding the molecular basis of different prolificacy between Chinese Taihu and Western pigs.
Major characteristics of DGE libraries and tag mapping to the integrated transcript database
Low Quality Tag
Tag CopyNum <2
CopyNum > =2
3′ tag mapping
Tags Mapped to Gene2
Unambiguous Tags Mapped to Gene3
Tags Mapped to Mitochondrion
Tags Mapped to Genome
Three databases (GenBank + EMBL + TIGR) were used to generate an integrated reference library for DGE tag mapping and sequence annotations. The tags in the reference library consisted of CATG, the recognition site for NlaIII, in conjunction with the next 17 nt sequences that were created by MmeI. One mismatch was allowed for DGE tag mapping to allow for potential polymorphisms between samples. This generated 649,443 reference tags, which corresponded to 425,980 unambiguous reference tags in the integrated reference library. Together, 95.10% and 76.74% of the clean tags and 78.02% and 72.27% of the unique clean tags were mapped to the reference library for ER and LL, respectively; 66.39% and 54.62% of the total clean tags and 60.98% and 59.30% of the unique clean tags were mapped unambiguously to the integrated reference library for ER and LL, respectively. In total, 12.80% and 17.33% of the unique tags were mapped to the mitochondrial genome and nuclear non-coding genome sequence, respectively. Other DGE unique tags (approximately 9.18% and 10.40% for ER and LL, respectively) were not mapped to the integrated reference library. These unknown tags probably arose from incomplete reference tag libraries. Tag position analyses (Additional file 2: Figure S2) indicated that the most DGE tags that matched the reference tags were close to the 3′ end of the transcripts. DGE based on Illumina sequencing was able to discriminate the tags from the sense and antisense strands of DNA. We found that 13,966 genes (2,210 NCBI, 1,153 GenBank, 3,575 TC, 5,951 Unigene and 1,075 ENSEMBL) had antisense transcripts for ER (Additional file 3: Table S1)), and 11,033 genes (1,542 NCBI, 1,437 GenBank, 2,980 TC, 4,129 Unigene and 945 ENSEMBL) for LL (Additional file 4: Table S2). In total, 16,150 and 38,077 unique tags were mapped to the non-coding nuclear genome for ER (Additional file 5: Table S3) and LL (Additional file 6: Table S4), respectively, which suggests that novel transcripts may exist close to these tags.
Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes
The tag number obtained via DGE reflects the level of expression of the transcripts represented by those tags. All the clean tags were mapped to the reference sequences; the number of unambiguous clean tags for each gene was calculated and normalized to tags per million (TPM). By comparing the normalized DGE profiles between ER and LL, we obtained the global transcriptional difference between ER and LL. The results showed that 13,612 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the breeds (Additional file 7: Table S5); 5,912 genes were more abundantly represented and 7,700 were less abundant in ER than in LL.
There were apparent differences in the proportions of expressed genes unique to ER and LL. A total of 52,298 genes were represented in the combined endometrial DGE profiles. The proportions of genes expressed uniquely in ER and LL were 13.5% (7,060/52,298) and 40.3% (21,066/52,298), respectively; the remaining genes were shared by the transcriptomes. Of the total number of genes expressed, 1.53% (800/52,298) and 1.84% (970/52,298) had an expression level of >0.01% in the ER and LL transcriptomes, respectively.
Gene Ontology (GO) and signalling pathway analysis
To identify the metabolic and signal transduction pathways in which the differentially expressed genes are likely to be involved, we performed pathway analysis on the basis of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database using an ultra-geometric test. In total, 4,006 differentially expressed genes had KEGG pathway annotations. As shown in Additional file 9: Table S6, the significant signaling pathways included steroid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, basal transcription factors, and the transcription machinery.
Expression analysis of candidate genes for embryonic survival
Differentially expressed genes in the endometrium that may affect sow prolificacy
Expression Level (TPM)
− Rate-limiting enzymes in PG synthesis .
− The same as those of PTGS1.
− Converts PGH2 to PGE2.
− Converts PGE2 into PGF2α.
− Converts PGE2 into PGF2α according to KEGG pathway.
− Transports iron to the embryos .
− Control and differentiation of the uterus for blastocyst implantation .
− The same as those of IGF1.
− Proliferation and differentiation of trophectoderm .
In this study, we generated the endometrial expression profiles and identified the genes differentially expressed in GD12 ER and LL endometrium. The results in this paper will be valuable for future studies on the identification of major genes for embryonic survival.
The genes for growth factors and nutrient-delivery proteins
The secretion of uteroferrin (UF) is not responsive to the plasma levels of iron , thus it is speculated that the iron supply to the embryos during the peri-implantation period is determined by genotypes. Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) is significantly associated with litter size in German Landrace pigs (P < 0.05) . Receptors for HB-EGF , KGF , IGF1 [60, 61], and IGF2  are all expressed by porcine embryos on GD12. Studies have shown that IGF1 promotes embryonic growth in response to the nutrient supply [63, 64], while IGF2 may regulate the supply of maternal nutrient to conceptus . The expression levels of the five genes (RBP4, UF, HB-EGF, KGF, and IGF1) and IGF2 in LL versus ER pigs were significantly up-regulated and down-regulated (Table 2), respectively. Vallet et al. (1998)  reported that expressions of UF and RBP were lower in pregnant Meishan endometrium than in White crossbred. The GO molecular function classification showed that the differential genes were associated with growth (Figure 2). The expression patterns and the physiological functions of these genes (Table 2) indicated that the endometrium of ER pigs had a lower growth-promoting ability to embryos than that of LL pigs. The above results can partially explain the phenomenon that embryos in uteri of Taihu sows grow slower than those in the uteri of Western sows.
IGF1 was expressed significantly higher in LL endometrium than in ER endometrium (Table 2). IGF1, rather than IGF2, is known to induce estrogen synthesis by stimulating expression of aromatase in the conceptus [60, 66]. Aromatase is the rate-limiting enzyme in estrogen synthesis in the pig conceptus . Therefore, it is very likely that ER embryos secret less estrogen than LL embryos, which will contribute to the higher embryonic survival rate in ER pigs. Moreover, IGF2 increases the permeability of the placenta in mice [65, 68], and thus a higher level of IGF2 in ER endometrium (Table 2) may improve the placental efficiency.
The genes in the prostaglandin (PG) synthetic pathway
PG synthesis in endometrum, especially the PGE2:PGF2α ratio, is crucial for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in pigs [27, 31, 46]. The high PGE2:PGF2α ratio may be a beneficial factor for large litter size in Meishan sows [31, 33]. The expressions of the genes, PTGS1/PTGS2, PGES/PGES2 and CBR1/CBR2, play critical roles in the PG synthesis.
PTGS1 and PTGS2 are rate-limiting enzymes in PG synthesis pathway . The expression level of PTGS2 is higher than that of PTGS1 in the endometrium of LL pigs on GD12 (Table 2), which is consistent with other studies using Western pigs [38, 69]; while the expression level of PTGS2 is lower than that of PTGS1 in ER sows (Table 2). In Western sows, PTGS2 is the primary enzyme involved in elevated PG synthesis [38, 69], whereas PTGS1 may perform this function in ER sows according to our results. It has been demonstrated that both the mRNA and the protein of PTGS2 have shorter half-lives than those of PTGS1 . Hence, the higher PTGS1 expression can contribute to the larger capacity for PG synthesis in ER pigs on GD12.
The convert of PGH2 to PGE2 in PG synthesis is catalyzed by PTGES  and PTGS2 [44, 45]. The higher expression of PTGES and PTGES2 in ER endometrium (Table 2) is helpful for the higher PGE2, which will be contribute to the higher ratio of PGE2 to PGF2α on GD 12.
In Western breeds, expression of CBR1 has been examined  but CBR2 neglected. Although the levels of endometrial CBR1 on GD12 and GD14 did not differ , the ratio of PGE2 to PGF2α on GD14 was higher than that on GD12 . CBR2 may play a role in the conversion of PGE2 into PGF2α according to our results and KEGG pathway (http://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_pathway?org_name =ssc&mapno = 00590&mapscale = 1.0&show_description = show), and that higher expression of CBR2 may decrease the ratio of PGE2 to PGF2α. In the present study, the patterns of expression of CBR1 and CBR2 observed in the two breeds (Table 2) suggest that the ratio in the endometrium of ER pigs be greater than that in the endometrium of LL pigs on GD12.
In summary, we have described genes that are expressed differentially in the endometrium of ER and LL pigs on GD12. Compared with those in the LL pigs, the gene expression profiles in the endometrium of the prolific ER pigs are found to benefit for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy, delay embryonic development and growth, and enhance uterine capacity via reduced estrogen secretion. The gene-driven events that are characteristic of ER pigs could contribute to the lower embryonic mortality and higher prolificacy of this indigenous Chinese Taihu breed. The data provided by this study will be useful for porcine transcriptomic studies.
Animal and tissue collection
All animal procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the Biological Studies Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangdong Province, China. Three LL sows (parity 3) and three ER sows (parity 3) were artificially inseminated (AI), and slaughtered on GD12. Endometrial samples were collected and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction was performed .
RNA extraction and cDNA libraries construction
Total RNA was isolated from the frozen endometrium of the two breeds using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The qualified total RNA was diluted to the same concentration, and then was reverse transcribed individually to generate cDNA libraries by first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara).
Construction of reference tag library
In order to generate a reference tag library, we downloaded the Sus scrofa Unigene from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (UniGene Build #36), reference cDNA library (Sscrofa9.58.cdna.all) from ENSEMBL (http://www.ensembl.org), and Tentative Consensus sequences (TCs, Release 13.0) from The Institute of Genome Research porcine index (TIGR, http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/). These databases were used according to a preset priority. The priority order was Unigene from NCBI, confirmatory gene/cDNA from ENSEMBL, TCs from TIGR, and novel and pseudogene predictions from ENSEMBL. The sense and antisense tags sequences of the references genes were included in the reference tag library.
DGE library construction and tag sequencing
Equal quantities of mRNA from three LL animals were pooled as a control sample, and mRNA from three ER as treatment sample. For sequence tag preparation, the two mRNA samples (6 μg respectively) were treated with Illumina′s Digital Gene Expression Tag Profiling Kit [72, 73]. The DGE tag libraries were anchored on the flowcell. During in situ amplification the single tag became clusters, which served as a template for sequencing on the Illumina Cluster Station and Genome Analyzer. Raw image data were transformed into the DGE tag sequence by base calling.
Analysis of DGE tag sequences
Raw data were filtered by Solexa mRNA tag pipeline (the copyrights are reserved by Beijing Genomics Institute, the number of copyright registration is 2009SR05447 in China) to remove adaptors, low quality tags and tags of copy number = 1, and a clean tag library was generated. The total tags were classified according to the copy numbers in the library and their percentages in the total tags and unique tags were shown. In addition, saturation analyses of the two DGE clean tag libraries were executed to determine their overall quality.
Mapping DGE tags
All clean DGE tags were mapped by aligning the sequences of DGE tags to the reference tag library. Unambiguous tags were annotated and ambiguous tags discarded. The clean tags corresponding to each gene were counted to quantify expression abundance of the genes. The raw expression levels were normalized to TPM [72, 73]. Statistical analysis of abundance of gene expression in endometrium was preformed, and the differently expressed genes were screened [74, 75]. Genes were deemed significantly differentially expressed with P values <0.001, false discovery rate (FDR) <0.001 and absolute value of log2-fold change > 2 in TPM between libraries. Genes with antisense reference tags corresponding to DGE tags were exclusively listed and annotated. The DGE tags that were unable to be mapped to the reference tag library and mitochondria were aligned to the nuclear genome to detect potential novel transcripts.
The hypergeometric test was preformed to identify significantly enriched GO terms by comparing to the whole genomic background . GO terms with a Q-value (i.e. Bonferroni adjusted P value) was less than 0.05 were defined as the significantly enriched GO terms. Furthermore, WEGO was employed to plot GO annotations of all expressed and differentially expressed genes .
According to KEGG database, hypergeometric test and multiple hypotheses correction were used to classify the pathway category . Pathways with a Q-value was less than 0.05 were defined as a significantly pathway enriched with differential gene expressions.
Validation of DGE results by real-time qPCR
qPCR was employed, and eight genes were selected to verify the DGE results. The details of these eight genes are summarized in Additional file 10: Table S7. Independent cDNA from the three sows for tag sequencing was used as template in LL and ER, respectively. qPCR was preformed with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara) on Lightcycler480 (Roche). For each biological replicate, the reactions of all eight genes and one pre-selected housekeeping gene were run on one plate in triplicate for each gene to represent technical replicates. The relative expression levels were calculated with the 2-ΔΔCt method . We had found that ribosomal protein S20 (RPS20) was the most suitable reference gene for comparison due to the stable expression between the two pig breeds , hence the results were normalized to the expression level of RPS20. The t-test was used to compare the levels of expression between the two breeds .
Digital gene expression profile
False discovery rate
Keratinocyte growth factor/fibroblast growth factor-7. GD, gestation day
Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor
Insulin-like growth factor
The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Landrace × Large White
TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1
Prostaglandin E synthase
Prostaglandin G/H synthesis
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Retinol binding protein 4
Ribosomal protein S20
Tags per million
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30871782) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (8151064201000035). Sponsors had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication, or preparation of the manuscript.
- Zhang Z: Chinese pig breed records. 1986, Shanghai, China: Shanghai Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar
- Ashworth C, Pickard A: Embryo survival and prolificacy. Progress in Pig Science. Edited by: Wiseman J, Varley M, Chadwick J. 1998, Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 303-325.Google Scholar
- Canario L, Cantoni E, Le Bihan E, Caritez J, Billon Y, Bidanel J, Foulley J: Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics. J Anim Sci. 2006, 84: 3185-3196. 10.2527/jas.2005-775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chu MX, Wu CX, Zhang JS, Gu JP, Sun SQ: Study on additive-dominant genetic model and gene effects on litter size in Erhualian pigs and Large White. J Nanjing Agri Univ. 2001, 24: 89-91.Google Scholar
- Galvin J, Wilmut I, Day B, Ritchie M, Thomson M, Haley C: Reproductive performance in relation to uterine and embryonic traits during early gestation in Meishan, Large White and crossbred sows. J Reprod Fertil. 1993, 98: 377-384. 10.1530/jrf.0.0980377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haley C, Lee G: Genetic basis of prolificacy in Meishan pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1993, 48: 247-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christenson R, Vallet J, Leymaster K, Young L: Uterine function in Meishan pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1993, 48: 279-289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JS: Preliminary study of inbreeding effects on reproductive traits of Erhualian sows. J Vet Med. 1991, 27: 32-34.Google Scholar
- Spötter A, Distl O: Genetic approaches to the improvement of fertility traits in the pig. Vet J. 2006, 172: 234-247. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.11.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dyck M, Ruvinsky A: Developmental genetics. The genetics of the pig. Edited by: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A. 2011, Wallingford: CABI Publishing, 263-305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ashworth C, Pickard A, Miller S, Flint A, Diehl J: Comparative studies of conceptus-endometrial interactions in Large White x Landrace and Meishan gilts. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997, 9: 217-225. 10.1071/R96040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW: Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1982, 27: 941-955. 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.941.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowen JA, Burghardt RC: Cellular mechanisms of implantation in domestic farm animals. Semin Cell Deve Biol. 2000, 11: 93-104. 10.1006/scdb.2000.0155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G: Comparative aspects of implantation. Reproduction. 2009, 138: 195-209. 10.1530/REP-09-0158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2: 195-209.Google Scholar
- Geisert RD, Renegar RH, Thatcher WW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW: Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: I. Interrelationships between preimplantation development of the pig blastocyst and uterine endometrial secretions. Biol Reprod. 1982, 27: 925-939. 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson ME, Ford SP: Differences in trophectoderm mitotic rate and P450 17alpha-hydroxylase expression between late preimplantation Meishan and Yorkshire conceptuses. Biol Reprod. 1997, 56: 380-385. 10.1095/biolreprod56.2.380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Youngs C, Christenson L, Ford S: Investigations into the control of litter size in swine: III. A reciprocal embryo transfer study of early conceptus development. J Anim Sci. 1994, 72: 725-731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson L, Christenson L, Christenson R, Ford S: Investigations into the control of litter size in swine: II. Comparisons of morphological and functional embryonic diversity between Chinese and American breeds. J Anim Sci. 1993, 71: 1566-1571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischer H, Bazer F, Fields M: Steroid metabolism by endometrial and conceptus tissues during early pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in gilts. J Reprod Fertil. 1985, 75: 69-78. 10.1530/jrf.0.0750069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson M, Ford S: Effect of estradiol-17beta administration during the time of conceptus elongation on placental size at term in Meishan pigs. J Anim Sci. 2000, 78: 1047-1052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vonnahme K, Wilson M, Ford S: Conceptus competition for uterine space: different strategies exhibited by the Meishan and Yorkshire pig. J Anim Sci. 2002, 80: 1311-1316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallet J, Klemcke H, Christenson R: Interrelationships among conceptus size, uterine protein secretion, fetal erythropoiesis, and uterine capacity. J Anim Sci. 2002, 80: 729-737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson G, Bazer F, Burghardt R, Spencer T, Wu G, Bayless K: Conceptus-uterus interactions in pigs: endometrial gene expression in response to estrogens and interferons from conceptuses. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2009, 66: 321-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ford S, Youngs C: Early embryonic development in prolific Meishan pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1993, 48: 271-278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan G, Geisert R, Zavy M, Shawley R, Fazleabas A: Development of pig blastocysts in a uterine environment advanced by exogenous oestrogen. J Reprod Fertil. 1987, 80: 125-131. 10.1530/jrf.0.0800125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kraeling R, Rampacek G, Fiorello N: Inhibition of pregnancy with indomethacin in mature gilts and prepuberal gilts induced to ovulate. Biol Reprod. 1985, 32: 105-110. 10.1095/biolreprod32.1.105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waclawik A: Novel insights into the mechanisms of pregnancy establishment: regulation of prostaglandin synthesis and signaling in the pig. Reproduction. 2011, 142: 389-399. 10.1530/REP-11-0033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christenson L, Anderson L, Ford S, Farley D: Luteal maintenance during early pregnancy in the pig: role for prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins. 1994, 47: 61-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waclawik A, Rivero-Muller A, Blitek A, Kaczmarek MM, Brokken LJS, Watanabe K, Rahman NA, Ziecik AJ: Molecular cloning and spatiotemporal expression of prostaglandin F synthase and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 in porcine endometrium. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 210-221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waclawik A, Ziecik AJ: Differential expression of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis enzymes in conceptus during peri-implantation period and endometrial expression of carbonyl reductase/PG 9-ketoreductase in the pig. J Endocrinol. 2007, 194: 499-510. 10.1677/JOE-07-0155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weems CW, Weems YS, Randel RD: Prostaglandins and reproduction in female farm animals. Vet J. 2006, 171: 206-228. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.11.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bazer F, Thatcher W, Matinat-Botte F, Terqui M, Lacroix M, Bernard S, Revault M, Dubois D: Composition of uterine flushings from Large White and prolific Chinese Meishan gilts. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1991, 3: 51-60. 10.1071/RD9910051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satterfield MC, Gao H, Li X, Wu G, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Select nutrients and their associated transporters are increased in the ovine uterus following early progesterone administration. Biol Reprod. 2010, 82: 224-231. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bazer FW, Song G, Kim J, Dunlap KA, Satterfield MC, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G: Uterine biology in pigs and sheep. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2012, 3: 23-10.1186/2049-1891-3-23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vallet J, Christenson RK, Trout WE, Klemcke HG: Conceptus, progesterone, and breed effects on uterine protein secretion in swine. J Anim Sci. 1998, 76: 2657-2670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bidanel J, Rosendo A, Iannuccelli N, Riquet J, Gilbert H, Caritez J, Billon Y, Amigues Y, Prunier A, Milan D: Detection of quantitative trait loci for teat number and female reproductive traits in Meishan X Large White F2 pigs. Animal. 2008, 2: 813-820.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blitek A, Waclawik A, Kaczmarek M, Stadejek T, Pejsak Z, Ziecik A: Expression of cyclooxygenase‐1 and‐2 in the porcine endometrium during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006, 41: 251-257. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00646.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sales KJ, Jabbour HN: Cyclooxygenase enzymes and prostaglandins in reproductive tract physiology and pathology. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2003, 71: 97-117. 10.1016/S1098-8823(03)00050-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murakami M, Kudo I: Recent advances in molecular biology and physiology of the prostaglandin E2-biosynthetic pathway. Prog Lipid Res. 2004, 43: 3-35. 10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00037-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK: Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell. 1997, 91: 197-208. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80402-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langenbach R, Loftin C, Lee C, Tiano H: Cyclooxygenase knockout mice: models for elucidating isoform-specific functions. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999, 58: 1237-1246. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00158-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silver RM, Edwin SS, Trautman MS, Simmons DL, Branch D, Dudley DJ, Mitchell MD: Bacterial lipopolysaccharide-mediated fetal death. Production of a newly recognized form of inducible cyclooxygenase (COX-2) in murine decidua in response to lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest. 1995, 95: 725-10.1172/JCI117719.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanikawa N, Ohmiya Y, Ohkubo H, Hashimoto K, Kangawa K, Kojima M, Ito S, Watanabe K: Identification and characterization of a novel type of membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2002, 291: 884-889. 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uenishi H, Eguchi T, Suzuki K, Sawazaki T, Toki D, Shinkai H, Okumura N, Hamasima N, Awata T: PEDE (Pig EST Data Explorer): construction of a database for ESTs derived from porcine full‐length cDNA libraries. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D484-D488. 10.1093/nar/gkh037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waclawik A, Jabbour HN, Blitek A, Ziecik AJ: Estradiol-17β, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and the PGE2 receptor are involved in PGE2 positive feedback loop in the porcine endometrium. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 3823-3832. 10.1210/en.2008-1499.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blomhoff R, Green MH, Berg T, Norum KR: Transport and storage of vitamin A. Science. 1990, 250: 399-404. 10.1126/science.2218545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harney JP, Ott TL, Geisert RD, Bazer FW: Retinol-binding protein gene expression in cyclic and pregnant endometrium of pigs, sheep, and cattle. Biol Reprod. 1993, 49: 1066-1073. 10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts R, Raub T, Bazer F: Role of uteroferrin in transplacental iron transport in the pig. Fed Proc. 1986, 45: 2513-2518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma S, Murphy SP, Barnea E: Genes regulating implantation and fetal development: a focus on mouse knockout models. Front Biosci. 2006, 11: 2123-2137. 10.2741/1955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sferruzzi‐Perri AN, Owens JA, Pringle KG, Roberts CT: The neglected role of insulin‐like growth factors in the maternal circulation regulating fetal growth. J Physiol. 2011, 589: 7-20. 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.198622.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Letcher R, Simmen R, Bazer F, Simmen F: Insulin-like growth factor-I expression during early conceptus development in the pig. Biol Reprod. 1989, 41: 1143-1151. 10.1095/biolreprod41.6.1143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das SK, Wang XN, Paria BC, Damm D, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M, Andrews GK, Dey SK: Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor gene is induced in the mouse uterus temporally by the blastocyst solely at the site of its apposition: a possible ligand for interaction with blastocyst EGF-receptor in implantation. Development. 1994, 120: 1071-1083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim JJ, Lee DR, Song HS, Kim KS, Yoon TK, Gye MC, Kim MK: Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) may improve embryonic development and implantation by increasing vitronectin receptor (integrin ανβ3) expression in peri-implantation mouse embryos. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2006, 23: 111-119. 10.1007/s10815-006-9021-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ka H, Jaeger LA, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Keratinocyte growth factor is up-regulated by estrogen in the porcine uterine endometrium and functions in trophectoderm cell proliferation and differentiation. Endocrinology. 2001, 142: 2303-2310. 10.1210/en.142.6.2303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallet J, Christenson R, Klemcke H, Pearson P: Intravenous infusion of iron and tetrahydrofolate does not influence intrauterine uteroferrin and secreted folate-binding protein content in swine. J Anim Sci. 2001, 79: 188-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spötter A, Müller S, Hamann H, Distl O: Effect of polymorphisms in the genes for LIF and RBP4 on litter size in two German pig lines. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009, 44: 100-105. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.01004.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan TJ, James PS, Pascall JC, Brown KD: Expression of the genes for TGF alpha, EGF and the EGF receptor during early pig development. Development. 1992, 116: 663-669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ka H, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW: Keratinocyte growth factor: expression by endometrial epithelia of the porcine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 1772-1778. 10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green M, Simmen R, Simmen F: Developmental regulation of steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in the periimplantation porcine conceptus: a paracrine role for insulin-like growth factor-I. Endocrinology. 1995, 136: 3961-3970. 10.1210/en.136.9.3961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corps A, Brigstock D, Littlewood C, Brown K: Receptors for epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I on preimplantation trophoderm of the pig. Development. 1990, 110: 221-227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chastant S, Monget P, Terqui M: Localization and quantification of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate (IGF-II/M6P) receptors in pig embryos during early pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1994, 51: 588-596. 10.1095/biolreprod51.4.588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu L, Harding J, Evans P, Gluckman P: Maternal insulin-like growth factor-I infusion alters feto-placental carbohydrate and protein metabolism in pregnant sheep. Endocrinology. 1994, 135: 895-900. 10.1210/en.135.3.895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fowden AL: The insulin-like growth factors and feto-placental growth. Placenta. 2003, 24: 803-812. 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00080-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sibley C, Coan P, Ferguson-Smith A, Dean W, Hughes J, Smith P, Reik W, Burton G, Fowden A, Constancia M: Placental-specific insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) regulates the diffusional exchange characteristics of the mouse placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 8204-8208. 10.1073/pnas.0402508101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sirianni R, Chimento A, Malivindi R, Mazzitelli I, Andò S, Pezzi V: Insulin-like growth factor-I, regulating aromatase expression through steroidogenic factor 1, supports estrogen-dependent tumor Leydig cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 8368-8377. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conley A, Christenson R, Ford S, Geisert R, Mason J: Steroidogenic enzyme expression in porcine conceptuses during and after elongation. Endocrinology. 1992, 131: 896-902. 10.1210/en.131.2.896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constância M, Hemberger M, Hughes J, Dean W, Ferguson-Smith A, Fundele R, Stewart F, Kelsey G, Fowden A, Sibley C: Placental-specific IGF-II is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth. Nature. 2002, 417: 945-948. 10.1038/nature00819.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashworth MD, Ross JW, Hu J, White FJ, Stein DR, Desilva U, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Geisert RD: Expression of porcine endometrial prostaglandin synthase during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, and following endocrine disruption of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2006, 74: 1007-1015. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046557.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang YJ, Mbonye UR, DeLong CJ, Wada M, Smith WL: Regulation of intracellular cyclooxygenase levels by gene transcription and protein degradation. Prog Lipid Res. 2007, 46: 108-125. 10.1016/j.plipres.2007.01.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallée M, Beaudry D, Roberge C, Matte JJ, Blouin R, Palin MF: Isolation of differentially expressed genes in conceptuses and endometrial tissue of sows in early gestation. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69: 1697-1706. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.019307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- AC't Hoen P, Ariyurek Y, Thygesen HH, Vreugdenhil E, Vossen RHAM, De Menezes RX, Boer JM, Van Ommen GJB, Den Dunnen JT: Deep sequencing-based expression analysis shows major advances in robustness, resolution and inter-lab portability over five microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: E141-E141. 10.1093/nar/gkn705.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiao S, Jia J, Mo D, Wang Q, Qin L, He Z, Zhao X, Huang Y, Li A, Yu J: Understanding PRRSV infection in porcine lung based on genome-wide transcriptome response identified by deep sequencing. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11377-10.1371/journal.pone.0011377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Audic S, Claverie JM: The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997, 7: 986-995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D: The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Statist. 2001, 29: 1165-1188. 10.1214/aos/1013699998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyle EI, Weng S, Gollub J, Jin H, Botstein D, Cherry JM, Sherlock G: GO: TermFinder—open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 3710-3715. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth456.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, Wang J, Li S, Li R, Bolund L: WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: W293-W297. 10.1093/nar/gkl031.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ: Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008, 3: 1101-1108. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Li J, Zhang A, Liu M, Zhang H: Selection of reference genes for studies of porcine endometrial gene expression on gestational day 12. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2011, 408: 265-268. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.04.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaps M, Lamberson WR: Biostatistics for animal science: An introductory text. 2009, Wallingford: CABI PublishingGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.