Skip to main content

Table 2 Overall mismatch rates in overlapping paired-end reads for raw read pairs, read pairs that have quality scores Q10, Q≥20, Q≥30 and Q≥35

From: Ultra-deep mutant spectrum profiling: improving sequencing accuracy using overlapping read pairs

Sample

Raw

Q10 (1×10-1)

Q20 (1×10-2)

Q30 (1×10-3)

Q35 (3×10-4)

BCV control

5.55×10-3

7.82×10-4

9.56×10-5

1.94×10-6

4.26×10-8

Rabies control

7.33×10-3

9.64×10-4

1.12×10-4

2.59×10-6

1.31×10-7

BCV

4.91×10-3

7.87×10-4

1.06×10-4

2.55×10-6

1.51×10-7

Fox1

8.92×10-3

1.01×10-3

1.73×10-4

8.82×10-6

6.92×10-7

Fox2

6.69×10-3

8.33×10-4

1.22×10-4

4.16×10-6

2.28×10-7

Average of 5 samples

6.68×10-3

8.75×10-4

1.22×10-4

4.01×10-6

2.49×10-7

Rabies control –repeat run

5.99×10-3

2.90×10-3

1.04×10-3

2.67×10-4

8.00×10-5

  1. The rabies control plasmid was sequenced a second time using a separate protocol at a different service provider and listed here for comparison. Mismatch rates are ‘per base pair’ so that they can be compared directly across samples and platforms. Phred error rates for the Q scores are shown in the heading.