Skip to main content

Table 3 Map positions and descriptive statistics for each of the putative QTLs underlying variation in life history traits and phototactic response for D. magna

From: An SNP-based second-generation genetic map of Daphnia magna and its application to QTL analysis of phenotypic traits

LG

QTL [cM]

95% CI

Length of CI

Marker

LOD

Additive (SE)

Dominance (SE)

% variance

Body size

2

176.5

161.6 – 185.6

24.0

scaffold01446_1050

5.2

0.050 (0.010)

0.011 (0.015)

11.7

3

72.0

61.5 – 96.6

35.1

contig23286_629

5.4

0.054 (0.011)

-0.006 (0.015)

12.0

6

11.1

5.1 – 74.3

69.2

contig28688_84

4.0

-0.040 (0.011)

0.027 (0.015)

9.1

10

14.6

3.1 – 24.4

21.3

contig53311_380

4.1

0.045 (0.011)

0.012 (0.015)

9.2

Lifetime offspring production (= fecundity)

1

7.32

0.8 – 12.6

11.8

scaffold00772_255

6.6

23.968 (4.199)

-1.767 (6.244)

14.6

3

124.7

118.9 – 139.2

20.3

scaffold01201_3880

3.8

-10.091 (5.075)

18.740 (7.363)

8.6

7

91.8

76.8 – 101.9

25.1

scaffold01869_1276

4.2

16.472 (4.466)

-16.117 (6.400)

9.5

8

96.4

86.9 – 105.7

18.8

scaffold01126_2577

3.9

12.526 (4.623)

-17.220 (6.706)

9.0

Difference in phototactic response

6

164.0

126.0 – 136.0

10.1

scaffold00892_2305

3.6

0.016 (0.026)

-0.169 (0.042)

8.2

  1. For each QTL, the location (linkage group (LG) and cM location), 95% confidence interval (CI) of the QTL region, name of nearest marker, lod-score (LOD), effect size (additive and dominance) with standard error (SE) and percent phenotypic variance explained is shown.