Skip to main content

Table 4 Pairwise alignments

From: Structured RNAs and synteny regions in the pig genome

Genome

Species

LASTZ/chaining options

Coverage

Alignment type

danRer7

Zebrafish

Distant

1.69

rbest

xenTro2

Frog

Distant

1.94

rbest

galGal3

Chicken

Distant

3.61

rbest

ornAna1

Platypus

Distant

5.97

rbest

monDom5

Opossum

Distant

10.70

syntenic

eriEur1

Hedgehog

Close

19.08

rbest

echTel1

Tenrec

Close

20.43

rbest

rn4

Rat

Close

25.76

syntenic

mm9

Mouse

Close

27.71

syntenic

dasNov2

Armadillo

Close

30.10

rbest

choHof1

Sloth

Close

30.94

rbest

tarSyr1

Tarsier

Close

36.80

rbest

oryCun2

Rabbit

Close

42.11

syntenic

felCat4

Cat

Close

43.42

rbest

loxAfr3

Elephant

Close

47.52

syntenic

turTru1

Dolphin

Close

53.93

rbest

hg19

Human

Close

55.93

syntenic

bosTau5

Cow

Close

58.13

syntenic

canFam2

Dog

Close

58.83

syntenic

equCab2

Horse

Close

63.90

syntenic

21way

Multiple alignment

  

78.98

  1. Pairwise and multiple alignments of the pig genome. The other genomes were obtained from the UCSC genome browser website in their lower-case masked form. Masking was performed by the UCSC with RepeatMasker and Tandem repeat masker. The UCSC genome designation is given in the first column. The options for the pairwise alignments are given in the third column as either closely or distantly related to the pig in accordance with the choices made by UCSC for the human genome. The distance to pig has implications for the LASTZ and axtChain options as listed in Additional file 1: Table S19. The coverage of the pig genome is given in % in the fourth column based on the number of non-Ns covered by the pairwise alignment after cleaning of the alignments as specified. The pairwise alignments are cleaned either by synteny (small alignment chains are deleted when they would otherwise break synteny) or by deleting all but the best alignments where the target genome is multiply-covered. Both methods reduces the coverage of the pig genome by the alignment. The choice of cleanup method is given in the last column. A graphical representation of the coverage is given in Figure 4.