Stenotrophomonas comparative genomics reveals genes and functions that differentiate beneficial and pathogenic bacteria
© Alavi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 September 2013
Accepted: 11 June 2014
Published: 18 June 2014
In recent years, the number of human infections caused by opportunistic pathogens has increased dramatically. Plant rhizospheres are one of the most typical natural reservoirs for these pathogens but they also represent a great source for beneficial microbes with potential for biotechnological applications. However, understanding the natural variation and possible differences between pathogens and beneficials is the main challenge in furthering these possibilities. The genus Stenotrophomonas contains representatives found to be associated with human and plant host.
We used comparative genomics as well as transcriptomic and physiological approaches to detect significant borders between the Stenotrophomonas strains: the multi-drug resistant pathogenic S. maltophilia and the plant-associated strains S. maltophilia R551-3 and S. rhizophila DSM14405T (both are biocontrol agents). We found an overall high degree of sequence similarity between the genomes of all three strains. Despite the notable similarity in potential factors responsible for host invasion and antibiotic resistance, other factors including several crucial virulence factors and heat shock proteins were absent in the plant-associated DSM14405T. Instead, S. rhizophila DSM14405T possessed unique genes for the synthesis and transport of the plant-protective spermidine, plant cell-wall degrading enzymes, and high salinity tolerance. Moreover, the presence or absence of bacterial growth at 37°C was identified as a very simple method in differentiating between pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates. DSM14405T is not able to grow at this human-relevant temperature, most likely in great part due to the absence of heat shock genes and perhaps also because of the up-regulation at increased temperatures of several genes involved in a suicide mechanism.
While this study is important for understanding the mechanisms behind the emerging pattern of infectious diseases, it is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind to assess the risk of beneficial strains for biotechnological applications. We identified certain traits typical of pathogens such as growth at the human body temperature together with the production of heat shock proteins as opposed to a temperature-regulated suicide system that is harnessed by beneficials.
KeywordsHuman pathogens Stress Protecting Agent (SPA) Genomics Transcriptomics
During the last years, the number of human infections caused by opportunistic pathogens has increased dramatically. One natural reservoir of opportunistic pathogens is the rhizosphere, the zone around roots that is influenced by the plant [1, 2]. Due to a high content of nutrients, this habitat is a ‘microbial hot-spot’, where bacterial abundances including those with strong antagonistic traits are enhanced . Various bacterial genera, including Burkholderia, Enterobacter, Herbaspirillum, Ochrobactrum, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, Staphylococcus and Stenotrophomonas, contain root-associated strains that can encounter bivalent interactions with both plant and human hosts . Mechanisms responsible for colonization of the rhizosphere and antagonistic activity against plant pathogens are similar to those responsible for colonization of human organs and tissues, and pathogenicity . Multiple resistances against antibiotics are not only found with clinical strains but also with strains isolated from the rhizosphere . High competition, the occurrence of diverse antibiotics and secondary antimicrobial plant metabolites, and enhanced horizontal gene transfer and mutation rates in this microenvironment contribute to the high levels of natural resistances . On the other hand, rhizosphere inhabitants have an enormous potential as biocontrol or stress protecting agents or as fertilizers for sustainable agriculture [6, 7].
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging global pathogen and already one of the most common opportunistic pathogens in hospitals [8, 9]. A recent study shows that approx. 5% of the Gram-negative infections were caused by S. maltophilia in intensive care units in the United States. The two most common diseases caused by S. maltophilia are bacteremia and pneumonia, which are often associated with high mortality rates. S. maltophilia strains are characterized by multi-resistance to many antibiotics . For a long time it was not possible to differentiate between the clinical and environmental S. maltophilia strains . Using a polyphasic approach, Wolf et al.  were able to describe a new plant-associated species within the S. maltophilia complex. Interestingly, no human-pathogenic potential has ever been observed in this phylogenetically and ecologically closely related species . Moreover, both species can be easily distinguished with regard to the production of the osmoprotective substance glucosylglycerol (only present in S. rhizophila) and the occurrence of specific multidrug-efflux pumps (only present in S. maltophilia) . S. rhizophila is both rhizosphere- and phylloplane- competent and shows pronounced salt tolerance, and is hence a model bacterium among the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) . Plant growth promotion by S. rhizophila strain DSM14405T (syn. strain e-p10) was observed under greenhouse conditions  and in the highly salinated soils of Uzbekistan at levels up to 180% . However, S. maltophilia was a typical rhizosphere bacterium used as an efficient biocontrol agent, and until the 1980s, no capacity to cause infection had ever been reported. Now, the theory is established that the ancestors of virulent bacteria including Stenotrophomonas, as well as the origin of virulence and resistance determinants, lay most likely in the environmental microbiota . It is now one of the main challenges to predict any risk for human health . Currently, these potential risk factors are a main obstacle in registration procedures, especially in the European Union . Next generation sequencing and the corresponding bioinformatic analyses have an enormous impact on our understanding of microbial communities and the host-microbe interactions [18, 19]. However, is it possible to use these techniques to solve this problem?
The objective of our study was to find out if there is a borderline based on the distinguishing features between the beneficials and pathogens within the genus Stenotrophomonas. Moreover, using genomics, transcriptomics and physiological assays, we try to predict the potential risk of the stress protecting agent S. rhizophila strain DSM14405T for humans by studying its genetic potentials and comparing these with two Stenotrophomonas model strains, the human-pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a  and the plant-associated S. maltophilia R551-3 .
Comparisons of plant and human-associated Stenotrophomonas genomes
General genomic characteristics of S. rhizophila DSM14405 T , S. maltophilia R551-3 and S. maltophilia K279a
S. rhizophila DSM 14405T*
S. maltophilia R551-3**
S. maltophilia K279a**
Number of bases
G = C content (%)
Number of CDSs
Average of ORF Length
Specific gene characteristics of S. rhizophila DSM14405T within the Stenotrophomonas/Xanthomonas group
Similar to various xanthomonads, S. rhizophila DSM14405T does not possess a homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing system, but instead uses the rpf/DSF system for quorum sensing and cell-cell communication. The rpf (regulation of pathogenicity factors) gene cluster is responsible for the synthesis and perception of the DSF molecule which is a quorum sensing regulatory molecule of fatty acid nature with similarity to enoyl-CoA hydratase, and was first detected in Xanthomonas [22, 23]. The rpfF gene product, known as DSF synthase, is essential for the synthesis of DSF [24, 25]. Other members of the rpf gene locus (rpfC, rpfG and rpfB) have been revealed to each fulfill a particular function, with the RpfC/RpfG two-component system consisting of a sensory (RpfC) and regulatory (RpfG) component that are responsible for DSF perception and signal transduction, respectively [22, 26].
Similar to Stenotrophomonas strains K279a and R551-3, the core of the rpf gene locus of S. rhizophila DSM14405T consists of four genes: rpfB, rpfF, rpfC and rpfG. Fouhy et al.  described the positions of these in the human-pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a, which we found to be similar to those in the plant-associated S. maltophilia R551-3. Moreover, in both K279a and R551-3, rpfB and rpfF are located on the lagging strand while rpfC and rpfG are located on the leading strand. In S. rhizophila DSM14405T, however, the rpfB and rpfF genes are located on the leading strand while rpfC and rpfG are on the lagging strand. In addition, in the genome of S. rhizophila, there is a 228-nucleotide gene of unknown function on the lagging strand between rpfF and rpfB, which extends from 2469447 to 2469674 and was annotated as Sr14405 DX03_10710. In addition, Sr14405 DX03_10710 is transcribed in the cell, as we detected the corresponding mRNA in a whole genome expression analysis approach (data not shown). There is no homologue to Sr14405 DX03_10710 in either S. maltophilia R551-3 or K279a, and its function in S. rhizophila DSM14405T remains to be elucidated.
Flagella and fimbriae-driven motility is crucial for biofilm formation and host-plant colonization by bacteria [28–30]. S. rhizophila DSM14405T possesses several genes responsible for motility. A gene block encoding a flagellar apparatus was detected that includes 22 genes, and extends over the genome from Sr14405 DX03_10335 to DX03_10430 with most genes located on the leading strand. Another flagella-encoding gene block was also detected which includes 26 genes and is located between Sr14405 DX03_10470 and DX03_10585. Furthermore, two putative fimbriae gene clusters, Sr14405 DX03_04025-DX03_04040 and Sr14405 DX03_04075-DX03_04095, were detected; other fimbriae-coding genes are scattered throughout the genome.
Chitinase, extracellular proteases, antibiotic and salinity resistance
S. rhizophila DSM14405T is a biocontrol agent capable of synthesizing extracellular enzymes with anti-pathogenic activity such as chitinase and extracellular proteases, and is antagonistic against important fungal pathogens such as Verticillium dahliae and Rhizoctonia solani [11, 31]. In addition to its direct effect, S. rhizophila DSM14405T is thought to also indirectly promote plant growth through biological control . In the genome, Sr14405 DX03_17135 codes for a putative extracellular chitinase gene, and Sr14405s DX03_03415, DX03_05635, DX03_16295, DX03_17120 are predicted to code for extracellular proteases.
In general, Stenotrophomonas species are known to show resistance against a broad range of antibiotics [8, 31]. There are numerous resistance genes against various antibiotics in the genome of S. rhizophila DSM14405T, some code for general resistance, while others provide resistance against particular classes of antibiotics. The gene cluster extending from Sr14405 DX03_01540 to DX03_01550 was predicted to code for a multidrug export system. Another two multidrug resistance gene clusters were detected from Sr14405 DX03_02075 to DX03_02085 and from DX03_13460 to DX03_13470. A number of single multidrug resistance genes, such as mdtN, mdtA and Sr14405 DX03_03380 are scattered throughout the genome as well. Moreover, macA and macB code for the macrolide-specific efflux protein and a macrolide export ATP-binding/permease, respectively. Other identified genes include: Sr14405 DX03_06420 and ampH that code for β-lactamases, Sr14405 DX03_08150 that codes for an aminoglycoside efflux pump, and a transposon tetracycline resistance gene (tetX).
S. rhizophila DSM14405T possesses both ggpS and ycaD, which are essential for the synthesis and transport of the important osmolyte glucosylglycerol, which provides tolerance against salinity and salt stress . Both ggpS and ycaD are absent in S. maltophilia R551-3 and K279a.
Homologs to xanA, xanB, and rmlAC were detected in S. rhizophila DSM14405T. These genes are involved in the biosynthesis of the Xanthomonas well-known surface polysaccharide xanthan, in biofilm formation  and the biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharides. It is noteworthy that S. rhizophila DSM14405T, similar to other members of the Stenotrophomonas species known so far, does not have a gum gene cluster and therefore cannot produce xanthan.
The bacterial capsule is an extracellular structure usually composed of polysaccharides which is considered an important virulence factor in surface adherence, antibiotic resistance, and preventing phagocytosis [34, 35]. Reckseidler et al.  demonstrated that the ability to synthesize capsule is crucial for virulence in the human pathogenic Burkholderia. In S. rhizophila DSM14405T, a gene block from Sr14405 DX03_11185 to DX03_11265 is homologous to a capsule biosynthesis gene cluster of Pseudomonas pseudomallei, described by . This gene block includes genes that code for proteins of various functions such as signal transduction, transport, and biosynthesis of capsule polysaccharide components. None of the genes present in the S. rhizophila capsule gene block were detected in S. maltophilia R551-3 and K279a.
Alginate, an exopolysaccharide, is involved in the development and architecture of biofilms and protects bacteria from antibiotics and other antibacterial mechanisms [38–40]. Alginate biosynthesis genes algI and algJ code for the poly (beta-D-mannuronate) O-acetylase and the alginate biosynthesis protein, respectively. While both were detected in S. rhizophila DSM14405T, neither the plant-associated strain S. maltophilia R551-3 nor the human pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a contained either of these genes. algI is preceded by four genes which are also absent from both S. maltophilia R551-3 and K279a, with one of these being homologous to a gene coding for a cell morphology protein from the biocontrol agent P. fluorescens SBW25.
While type II and V secretion system genes were identified in S. rhizophila DSM14405T, there is no type III secretion system present, as this is typical of Stenotrophomonas. Although there are several genes belonging to the type IV secretion system, a complete gene set was not detected in S. rhizophila DSM14405T. Furthermore, a gene block extending from Sr14405 DX03_08870 to DX03_09120 was identified in S. rhizophila, which includes numerous genes of the type VI secretion system (T6SS) including icmF, impA, genes belonging to the Hcp1 family, and genes coding for proteins with a T6SS Rhs element. With the exception of Sr14405 DX03_09050, DX03_09095, and DX03_09115, there were no homologs in S. maltophilia K279a and R551-3 to any of the genes of the S. rhizophila type VI secretion system block.
One genus, two entirely different habitats and life styles? : Genome comparison between S. rhizophila DSM14405T and S. maltophiliaK279a
All genes of the plant growth-promoting environmental S. rhizophila DSM14405T and the clinical human pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a were compared. While absent from S. maltophilia K279a, numerous S. rhizophila-specific genes play a role in host-plant colonization. Some of these genes, as described earlier, are crucial for surface attachment, biofilm formation, secretion systems-driven molecular mechanisms, and tolerance of environmental stress such as high soil salinity. In addition, another S. rhizophila-specific gene was predicted to code for spermidine synthase (speE). Spermidine is a plant growth regulator and has been recently shown to strongly promote the growth of arugula plants . There are also S. rhizophila-specific genes that are predicted to be involved in the biodegradation of bacterial and plant cell wall. mltD, located closely to the S. rhizophila type VI secretion system gene block, codes for muramidase that plays an important role in the bacterial cell wall breakdown. Furthermore, a gene block stretching from Sr14405 DX03_09870 to DX03_09895 was predicted to code for several genes involved in the breakdown of plant cell walls.
Selected S. rhizophila DSM14405 T –specific genes revealing no homologs in the human pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a with their role in coping with the environment and bacteria-plant interactions
Plant growth promotion
type VI secretion system effector
Rhs element Vgr protein with a type VI secretion system protein domain
type VI section system protein
type VI section system-associated protein ImpA family
Rhs element Vgr protein with a type VI secretion system protein domain
Bacterial and Plant cell wall breakdown
Resistance towards antibiotics and salinity
three multidrug resistance proteins; form together a multidrug resistance protein channel
transposon tetracycline resistance protein
aminoglycoside efflux protein
multidrug resitance proteins
transposon tetracycline repressor protein
glucoslglycerol-phosphate synthase; essential for the synthesis of the osmolyte glucoslglycerol
Surface attachment and biofilm formation
capsule polysaccharide export protein
capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis protein
colanic biosynthesis UDP-glucose lipid transferase
poly (beta-D-mannuronate) O-acetylase
alginate bioynthesis protein Algl
ferrichrome receptor proteins
Selected human pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a–specific genes, which are involved in virulence and pathogenicity, and reveal no homologs in S. rhizophila DSM14405 T
fimbrial adhesin proteins
pili chaperone protein
outer membrane usher protein
Hep Hag family adhesin
exopolysaccharide synthesis protein
cell surface haemagluttinin protein
Secretion system-mediated pathogenicity, horizontal gene transfer
type IV secretion system transmembrane proteinS
type IV secretion conjugal transfer proteins
Heat shock resistance, chaperones
heat shock chaperone protein
chaperone heat shock Hsp70 protein
heat shock chaperone protein
flouroquinolone resistance protein
macrolide-specific ABC-type efflux
multidrug efflux system outer membrane protein
multidrug efflux protein
drug resistance efflux protein
The temperature limit: the transcriptional response of S. rhizophila DSM14405Tto 35°C
Selected S. rhizophila DSM14405 T genes with known biological roles impacted by the 35°C heat shock
Transcription fold change
heat shock sigma factor
negative regulator of sigma 24
chaperone complex protein
prevents the aggregation of stress-denatured proteins
heat shock chaperone
heat shock chaperone
heat shock chaperone
heat shock response
ATPase with chaperone activity
degradation of abnormal/stress-denatured proteins
degradation of abnormal/stress-denatured proteins
degradation of abnormal/stress-denatured proteins
degradation of abnormal/stress-denatured proteins due to heat shock
degradation of abnormal/stress-denatured proteins
Protein degradation under thermal stress
DNA-binding protein; accessory protein for DnaJ
heat shock response
general stress protein
primary general stress sigma factor
fimbrial assembly family protein
pilus assembly protein PilO
pilus assembly protein PilP
pilus assembly protein PilQ
fimbrial protein pilin
type 4 fimbrial biogenesis
pre-pilin leader sequence
pre-pilin leader-like sequence
In the present work, we characterized the genomic features of the plant growth promoting and biocontrol agent S. rhizophila DSM14405T. In addition, the comparison between the genome of S. rhizophila with other environmental and clinical Stenotrophomonas model strains, S. maltophilia R551-3 and K279a, respectively revealed a great deal of homology shared among all three bacteria. Surprisingly, the comparison of S. rhizophila’s genes with either of the other two strains showed that the total number of genes shared between S. rhizophila and the human-pathogenic S. maltophilia K279a is only slightly less than the total gene number shared with the plant-associated beneficial S. maltophilia R551-3 strain. Given this significant degree of similarity, we concluded that the immense difference between S. rhizophila and S. maltophilia K279a with regard to the habitat and lifestyle must be based upon the role of those genes that are specific to either of the strains and absent from the other. On this account, a number of S. rhizophila specific genes coding for products of known function were detected and classified according to their biological roles. These include genes involved in plant growth promotion, plant cell wall degradation, biofilm formation, resistance against salinity and the type VI secretion system (T6SS).
Clearly as an environmental plant-associated strain, S. rhizophila faces particular habitat-specific factors such as those that impose some sort of osmotic stress on the cell including root exudates and salinity. In a study published recently, we used a transcriptomic approach to study the manner of response of S. rhizophila DSM14405T to osmotic stress . Surprisingly, the combination of both the genomic and transcriptomic data reveals that a significant number of the genes with known biological role that are greatly involved in osmotic stress protection including cbg1, xynB, ggpS, ycaD, algJ and the T6SS are specific to S. rhizophila and absent from S. maltophilia K279a. This finding confirms the importance of the strain specific genes in the adaptation and performance of S. rhizophila in its natural habitat. As a clinical human-pathogenic strain, S. maltophilia K279a also possesses particular genetic potentials that make possible its lifestyle (Table 3, Figure 5). The role of type IV secretion system, hemolysin and other adherence components in virulence and pathogenicity was described earlier. A yet more crucial feature of S. maltophilia K279a with regard to performance in its habitat, however, is perhaps its ability to grow at 37°C. Also in this regard, this strain possesses specific heat shock resistance genes that are absent from S. rhizophila.
As mentioned earlier, S. rhizophila DSM14405T is not able to grow at 37°C. To understand the manner of response of S. rhizophila to severe growth-inhibiting temperature, a genome-wide gene expression analysis was performed at 35°C using transcriptomics. The positive impact of the growth temperature at 35°C compared to 30°C on several functional gene groups including those responsible for the metabolism and transport of amino acids, lipids and the energy providing genes is due to the heat stress that the cell is coping with. Furthermore, studying the expression of single genes revealed that those genes coding for general and heat shock specific chaperones, various proteases that break down stress-denatured, abnormal proteins are up-regulated. For example at 35°C, the primary general stress sigma factor 24 coding gene, which is strongly expressed at an earlier stage under cell stress, and initiates the expression of rpoH (the heat shock specific sigma factor 32), specific chaperones (e. g. fkpA) and protease coding genes (e. g. degP) is down-regulated while rpoH, and other response mechanisms show up-regulation. This confirms an advanced state of shock for S. rhizophila at 35°C, at which heat shock specific response mechanisms are strongly activated. In this regard, the up-regulation of Sr14405 DX03_18795 and DX03_18990 (absent from S. maltophilia K279a) which code for toxin/antidote-based suicide systems further illustrate the mechanisms used by S. rhizophila DSM14405T to respond to the severe heat stress. Moreover, reduced cell motility, which is also part of these response mechanisms, is presumably due to the fact that costly processes such as motility are to be minimized during harsh stress times.
Overall, there is a great deal of similarity between the beneficial and human-pathogenic Stenotrophomonas model strains. Nevertheless, the adaptation to the habitat and lifestyle to guarantee the survival of the species is cared for by mechanisms specific to either of the groups, and many genes underlying these mechanisms in S. rhizophila DSM14405T are strain-specific. Furthermore according to the genomic and transcriptomic analyses together with its physiological characteristics, S. rhizophila poses no threat to human health and could hence be safely applied in biotechnology.
Genome sequencing, assembly, annotation of S. rhizophila DSM14405T
The genome of S. rhizophila DSM14405T was sequenced using a combination of next generation sequencing platforms. A first draft assembly based on 905,689 reads of an 8kbp paired-end library (Roche 454 GS, FLX Titanium, Helmholtz Center Munich, Germany) with a total of 167.1 Mbps (36-fold coverage) was generated with Newbler 2.6 (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany). This assembly consisted of 175 contigs, 122 of which could be joined into a single circular scaffold. Gaps resulting from repetitive sequences were resolved by in silico gap filling, remaining gaps were closed by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing or by long reads from a Pacific BioSciences sequencing run (PacBio RS, 150,305 reads, 174.8 Mbps, 38-fold coverage, GATC, Konstanz, Germany), yielding a draft genome of 4,648,936 bps. To improve the quality of the sequence by eliminating 454 sequencing artefacts in homopolymer stretches, the genome was subsequently sequenced using the Illumina paired-end method (Illumina HiSeq 2000, 15,086,654 reads, 1508 Mbp; 324-fold coverage, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). The Illumina reads were aligned to the draft genome with CLC Genomics Workbench 4.7.2 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). The final consensus sequence was derived by counting instances of each nucleotide at a position and then letting the majority decide the nucleotide in the consensus sequence. Genes were identified with the Prodigal gene finder , ARAGORN , and RNAmmer 1.2 . Functional annotation of the predicted genes was performed using BASys , which provides annotations with respect to Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) , Pfam  and Gene Ontology (GO) . The final genome includes 4,648,976 bases with a GC content of 67.26%.
Comparative genomics and bioinformatic analyses
Whole genome comparisons between S. rhizophila DSM14405T, S. maltophilia R551-3 and K279a were performed using Mauve 2.3  and Artemis Comparison Tool (ACT) . In the approach using Mauve, the Progressive Mauve algorithm was used to score the genome alignment. DNAPlotter  was used for circular genome visualization. Orthologous coding DNA sequences (CDS) shared between S. rhizophila DSM14405T and the other two Stenotrophomonas were assessed by performing reciprocal BLASTp best hits with an identity and e-value threshold of 30% and 10-6, respectively.
Cell culture growth conditions for transcriptomic analyses
S. rhizophila DSM14405T was grown in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml CAA minimal medium at 30°C under agitation until OD600 of 0.9 was reached. To introduce heat shock prior to RNA extraction, some of the flasks containing the culture were exposed to 35°C for 2 h under identical agitation conditions while the rest of the flasks remained at 30°C for the same period of time (control).
RNA extraction and transcriptomic analyses
RNA was extracted from 250 μl of each of the cultures exposed to 30°C and 35°C in duplicates using the RNeasy Mini Kit and the RNAprotect® Bacteria Reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA was sent to a sequencing service offered by GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) where the samples were processed according to company’s proprietary protocols including depletion of rRNA (Ribo-Zero RNA Removal Kit, Epicentre, Madison, USA), fragmentation of mRNA, random-primed synthesis of cDNA, double strand synthesis and library preparation. Sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 50 bp single read mode resulting in 15,202,000 to 37,966,600 quality reads per sample. Reads were mapped to the reference genome of S. rhizophila DSM14405T and only the corresponding normalized values for the reads that uniquely mapped to each CDS were used to assess the changes in gene transcription. The transcription fold change as the result of the temperature shift was assessed for each CDS by dividing its read number for the cell culture treated at 35°C by the value from the culture grown at 30°C. Of the total genes either up or down-regulated, only those showing fold changes greater than or equal to 1.5 and less than or equal to 0.6 were considered as significantly impacted.
Availability of supporting data
The genome of Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T was deposited in the NCBI database and can be accessed under the BioProject Nr. CP007597.
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF (P 20542-B16) by a grant to G.B. The genome sequence was prepared by the Schloter group (Munich); we thank Brigitte Hai and Michael Schoter for excellent cooperation. The genome sequence was funded by a project in the Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, which has been supported by the Austrian BMWFJ, BMVIT, SFG, Standortagentur Tirol and ZIT through the Austrian FFG-COMET-Funding Program.
- Hartmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M: Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant and Soil. 2008, 312 (1–2): 7-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berg G, Eberl L, Hartmann A: The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2005, 7 (11): 1673-1685. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00891.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM: The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013, 37 (5): 634-663. 10.1111/1574-6976.12028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berg G, Roskot N, Smalla K: Genotypic and phenotypic relationships between clinical and environmental isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37 (11): 3594-3600.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez JL: Bacterial pathogens: from natural ecosystems to human hosts. Environ Microbiol. 2013, 15 (2): 325-333. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02837.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berg G, Egamberdieva D, Lugtenberg B, Hagemann M: Symbiotic plant–microbe interactions: stress protection, plant growth promotion, and biocontrol by Stenotrophomonas. Symbioses and Stress. 2010, Netherlands: Anonymous Springer, 445-460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch PR, Mauchline TH: Who’s who in the plant root microbiome?. Nat Biotechnol. 2012, 30 (10): 961-962. 10.1038/nbt.2387.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison MB, Berg G, van der Lelie D, Dow JM: The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009, 7 (7): 514-525. 10.1038/nrmicro2163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brooke JS: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012, 25 (1): 2-41. 10.1128/CMR.00019-11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez MB, Hernandez A, Martinez JL: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4 (6): 655-660. 10.2217/fmb.09.45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolf A, Fritze A, Hagemann M, Berg G: Stenotrophomonas rhizophila sp. nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with antifungal properties. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002, 52 (Pt 6): 1937-1944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribbeck-Busch K, Roder A, Hasse D, de Boer W, Martinez JL, Hagemann M, Berg G: A molecular biological protocol to distinguish potentially human pathogenic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from plant-associated Stenotrophomonas rhizophila. Environ Microbiol. 2005, 7 (11): 1853-1858. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00928.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berg G, Alavi P, Schmidt C, Egamberdieva D, Kamilova F, Lugtenberg B: Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere. Volume 2. Edited by: de Bruijn FJ. 2013, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 1Google Scholar
- Schmidt CS, Alavi M, Cardinale M, Müller H, Berg G: Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T promotes plant growth probably by altering fungal communities in the rhizosphere. Biol Fertility Soils. 2012, 48 (8): 947-960. 10.1007/s00374-012-0688-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Egamberdieva D, Kucharova Z, Davranov K, Berg G, Makarova N, Azarova T, Chebotar V, Tikhonovich I, Kamilova F, Validov SZ: Bacteria able to control foot and root rot and to promote growth of cucumber in salinated soils. Biol Fertility Soils. 2011, 47 (2): 197-205. 10.1007/s00374-010-0523-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berg G: Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009, 84 (1): 11-18. 10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehlers R: Regulation of Biological Control Agents. 2011, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 417-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schenk PM, Carvalhais LC, Kazan K: Unraveling plant-microbe interactions: can multi-species transcriptomics help?. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30 (3): 177-184. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.11.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Köberl M, Schmidt R, Ramadan EM, Bragina A, Müller H, Berg G: Biocontrol Strategies and Next Generation Sequencing: Organic Desert Agriculture in Egypt. 2013, Brisbane, Australia: iConcept PressGoogle Scholar
- Crossman LC, Gould VC, Dow JM, Vernikos GS, Okazaki A, Sebaihia M, Saunders D, Arrowsmith C, Carver T, Peters N, Adlem E, Kerhornou A, Lord A, Murphy L, Seeger K, Squares R, Rutter S, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Harris D, Churcher C, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Thomson NR, Avison MB: The complete genome, comparative and functional analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals an organism heavily shielded by drug resistance determinants. Genome Biol. 2008, 9 (4): R74-2008-9-4-r74-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S, Newman L, Hoffman A, Weyens N, Barac T, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D: Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75 (3): 748-757. 10.1128/AEM.02239-08.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barber CE, Tang JL, Feng JX, Pan MQ, Wilson TJ, Slater H, Dow JM, Williams P, Daniels MJ: A novel regulatory system required for pathogenicity of Xanthomonas campestris is mediated by a small diffusible signal molecule. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 24 (3): 555-566. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3721736.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang LH, He Y, Gao Y, Wu JE, Dong YH, He C, Wang SX, Weng LX, Xu JL, Tay L, Fang RX, Zhang LH: A bacterial cell-cell communication signal with cross-kingdom structural analogues. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (3): 903-912.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deng Y, Wu J, Tao F, Zhang LH: Listening to a new language: DSF-based quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. Chem Rev. 2011, 111 (1): 160-173. 10.1021/cr100354f.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryan RP, Dow JM: Communication with a growing family: diffusible signal factor (DSF) signaling in bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19 (3): 145-152. 10.1016/j.tim.2010.12.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slater H, Alvarez-Morales A, Barber CE, Daniels MJ, Dow JM: A two-component system involving an HD-GYP domain protein links cell-cell signalling to pathogenicity gene expression in Xanthomonas campestris. Mol Microbiol. 2000, 38 (5): 986-1003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fouhy Y, Scanlon K, Schouest K, Spillane C, Crossman L, Avison MB, Ryan RP, Dow JM: Diffusible signal factor-dependent cell-cell signaling and virulence in the nosocomial pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (13): 4964-4968. 10.1128/JB.00310-07.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pratt LA, Kolter R: Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 30 (2): 285-293. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vande Broek A, Lambrecht M, Vanderleyden J: Bacterial chemotactic motility is important for the initiation of wheat root colonization by Azospirillum brasilense. Microbiology. 1998, 144 (Pt 9): 2599-2606.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Weert S, Vermeiren H, Mulders IH, Kuiper I, Hendrickx N, Bloemberg GV, Vanderleyden J, De Mot R, Lugtenberg BJ: Flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components is an important trait for tomato root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002, 15 (11): 1173-1180. 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1173.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minkwitz A, Berg G: Comparison of antifungal activities and 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of clinical and environmental isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39 (1): 139-145. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.139-145.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roder A, Hoffmann E, Hagemann M, Berg G: Synthesis of the compatible solutes glucosylglycerol and trehalose by salt-stressed cells of Stenotrophomonas strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 243 (1): 219-226. 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.12.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang TP, Somers EB, Wong AC: Differential biofilm formation and motility associated with lipopolysaccharide/exopolysaccharide-coupled biosynthetic genes in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (8): 3116-3120. 10.1128/JB.188.8.3116-3120.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith HE, Damman M, van der Velde J, Wagenaar F, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Smits MA: Identification and characterization of the cps locus of Streptococcus suis serotype 2: the capsule protects against phagocytosis and is an important virulence factor. Infect Immun. 1999, 67 (4): 1750-1756.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyce JD, Adler B: The capsule is a virulence determinant in the pathogenesis of Pasteurella multocida M1404 (B:2). Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (6): 3463-3468. 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3463-3468.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reckseidler SL, DeShazer D, Sokol PA, Woods DE: Detection of bacterial virulence genes by subtractive hybridization: identification of capsular polysaccharide of Burkholderia pseudomallei as a major virulence determinant. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (1): 34-44. 10.1128/IAI.69.1.34-44.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cuccui J, Milne TS, Harmer N, George AJ, Harding SV, Dean RE, Scott AE, Sarkar-Tyson M, Wren BW, Titball RW, Prior JL: Characterization of the Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243 capsular polysaccharide I coding region. Infect Immun. 2012, 80 (3): 1209-1221. 10.1128/IAI.05805-11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monday SR, Schiller NL: Alginate synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the role of AlgL (alginate lyase) and AlgX. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (3): 625-632.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB: Lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002, 15 (2): 194-222. 10.1128/CMR.15.2.194-222.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stapper AP, Narasimhan G, Ohman DE, Barakat J, Hentzer M, Molin S, Kharazmi A, Hoiby N, Mathee K: Alginate production affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development and architecture, but is not essential for biofilm formation. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 53 (Pt 7): 679-690.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Whaibi MH, Siddiqui MH, Al-Munqadhi BM, Sakran AM, Ali HM, Basalah MO: Influence of plant growth regulators on growth performance and photosynthetic pigments status of Eruca sativa Mill. J Med Plants Res. 2012, 6 (10): 1948-1954.Google Scholar
- Alavi P, Starcher MR, Zachow C, Muller H, Berg G: Root-microbe systems: the effect and mode of interaction of Stress Protecting Agent (SPA) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405 (T.). Front Plant Sci. 2013, 4: 141-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ: Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010, 11: 119-2105-11-119-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laslett D, Canback B: ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (1): 11-16. 10.1093/nar/gkh152.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW: RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35 (9): 3100-3108. 10.1093/nar/gkm160.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Domselaar GH, Stothard P, Shrivastava S, Cruz JA, Guo A, Dong X, Lu P, Szafron D, Greiner R, Wishart DS: BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Web Server issue): W455-9-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Sverdlov AV, Vasudevan S, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 41-10.1186/1471-2105-4-41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A: The Pfam protein family’s database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Database issue): D211-D222.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gene Ontology Consortium: Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (8): 1425-1433. 10.1101/gr.180801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT: ProgressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (6): e11147-10.1371/journal.pone.0011147.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J: ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (16): 3422-3423. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J: DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (1): 119-120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.