Open Access

De novo sequencing and comparative analysis of holy and sweet basil transcriptomes

  • Shubhra Rastogi1,
  • Seema Meena1,
  • Ankita Bhattacharya1,
  • Sumit Ghosh1,
  • Rakesh Kumar Shukla1,
  • Neelam Singh Sangwan2,
  • Raj Kishori Lal3,
  • Madan Mohan Gupta4,
  • Umesh Chandra Lavania3,
  • Vikrant Gupta1,
  • Dinesh A Nagegowda1Email author and
  • Ajit Kumar Shasany1Email author
BMC Genomics201415:588

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-588

Received: 16 April 2014

Accepted: 4 July 2014

Published: 12 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Ocimum L. of family Lamiaceae is a well known genus for its ethnobotanical, medicinal and aromatic properties, which are attributed to innumerable phenylpropanoid and terpenoid compounds produced by the plant. To enrich genomic resources for understanding various pathways, de novo transcriptome sequencing of two important species, O. sanctum and O. basilicum, was carried out by Illumina paired-end sequencing.

Results

The sequence assembly resulted in 69117 and 130043 transcripts with an average length of 1646 ± 1210.1 bp and 1363 ± 1139.3 bp for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively. Out of the total transcripts, 59648 (86.30%) and 105470 (81.10%) from O. sanctum and O. basilicum, and respectively were annotated by uniprot blastx against Arabidopsis, rice and lamiaceae. KEGG analysis identified 501 and 952 transcripts from O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively, related to secondary metabolism with higher percentage of transcripts for biosynthesis of terpenoids in O. sanctum and phenylpropanoids in O. basilicum. Higher digital gene expression in O. basilicum was validated through qPCR and correlated to higher essential oil content and chromosome number (O. sanctum, 2n = 16; and O. basilicum, 2n = 48). Several CYP450 (26) and TF (40) families were identified having probable roles in primary and secondary metabolism. Also SSR and SNP markers were identified in the transcriptomes of both species with many SSRs linked to phenylpropanoid and terpenoid pathway genes.

Conclusion

This is the first report of a comparative transcriptome analysis of Ocimum species and can be utilized to characterize genes related to secondary metabolism, their regulation, and breeding special chemotypes with unique essential oil composition in Ocimum.

Keywords

Comparative transcriptomics Chromosome Ocimum sanctum Ocimum basilicum Phenylpropanoids Terpenoids

Background

Ocimum L., belonging to family Lamiaceae is one of the best known genus for its medicinal properties and economically important aromatic oils. Some Ocimum species are also constituents of Ayurvedic and indigenous medicines. This genus is highly variable and possesses wide range of intra- and inter-specific genetic diversity comprising at least 65 [1] to more than 150 species [2] distributed all over the world. Among these, Ocimum sanctum L. (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.) and Ocimum basilicum L. are the two important species used extensively for their medicinal and industrial importance. O. sanctum, known as “the holy basil” is native to Asian tropics [3], whereas O. basilicum L. or “the sweet basil” is described to be of African origin as per the Germplasm Resources Information Network [4] of United States Department of Agriculture. While holy basil is revered for its spiritual sanctity and medicinal potential [5], the sweet basil is widely used as culinary herb and for fragrance [6]. Both of the two Ocimum species are rich reservoirs of innumerable phytochemicals, which comprises predominantly phenylpropanoids and terpenoids with various medicinal and aromatic properties. Most of these phytochemicals are sequestered in specialized anatomical structures, termed glandular trichomes, on the surface of the aerial parts of the plants [7]. O. sanctum is known to possess antibacterial, antianaphylactic, antihistaminic, wound healing, radioprotective, antidiabetic, larvicidal, anti-genotoxic, neuro-protective, cardio-protective and mast cell stabilization activity [8]. The leaves and stem of holy basil contain a variety of biologically active constituents like saponins, flavonoids, triterpenoids, and tannins [9]. Urosolic acid (UA) from O. sanctum L. is reported to have cardioprotective effect [10]. Some active phenolics like rosmarinic acid, apigenin, cirsimaritin, isothymusin and isothymonin exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [10]. The most important aroma components are described to be 1, 8 cineole, linalool, methyl chavicol (estragole) and to a lesser degree, eugenol [11]. Similarly, the essential oil of sweet basil (O. basilicum) is described to be having antifungal, antimicrobial and insect-repelling activities [12]. O. basilicum, contains primarily phenolic derivatives, such as eugenol, methyl eugenol, chavicol, estragole, and methyl cinnamate, often combined with various amounts of linalool [13]. This is also reported to be clinically useful for prevention of stroke, and exhibiting anticarcinogenic, antituberculosis and hypoglycemic activities [14, 15]. Thus, the uses of Ocimum sp. for therapeutic purposes in addition to their industrial importance for aromatic properties reinforce the importance of ethno-botanical approach as a potential source of bioactive substances.

Despite spiritual, pharmacological, and industrial importance, very little transcriptomic and genomic data of Ocimum sp. is available limiting the studies on biosynthetic pathways of important phytochemicals [7]. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) shows a record of 312 entries in nucleotide database and 23336 EST sequences of O. basilicum compared to only 61 entries in nucleotide database and 108 EST sequences of O. sanctum. In recent years, several studies have successfully reported the generation of transcriptome data and its analysis as an effective tool to study gene expression in specific tissues at specific time, and also provide a platform to address comparative genomics for gene discovery in non-model plants for which no reference genome sequences are available [16]. Due to the availability of quick, low cost sequencing [17] and high quality annotation using different assembly tools [18] it has become possible to analyze and understand the genome of non model plant like Ocimum. Hence, O. sanctum and O. basilicum were selected for next generation sequencing (NGS) and analysis with the main objective to establish the basic understanding about genes involved in various pathways and the factors involved in the regulation and channelling of the secondary metabolites like phenylpropanoids and terpenoids. So, leaf transcriptome data of O. sanctum (CIM Ayu- eugenol rich variety) and O. basilicum (CIM Saumya- methylchavicol rich variety) [19] was generated using paired-end (PE) Illumina NGS sequencing platform and genes involved in phenylpropanoids/ terpenoids biosynthesis pathway were identified. This study also reports EST collection of leaf tissues from O. sanctum and O. basilicum with a number of differentially expressed cytochrome P450s, transcription factors and pathway genes with probable involvement in differential metabolite biosynthesis in O. sanctum and O. basilicum leaf tissues. Using these datasets, molecular markers of EST-SSRs were also analyzed to facilitate the marker-assisted breeding of these species. Overall, this data set will be a significant advancement in terms of genomic resources in the diverse Ocimum genus.

Results and Discussion

Transcriptome sequencing, de novoassembly and functional annotation of contigs

In recent years, Illumina sequencing platform has been widely used for transcriptome analysis of plants devoid of reference genomes [2022]. In order to generate transcriptome sequences, complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries prepared from leaf tissues of Ocimum were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq1000 platform. Paired-end Sequencing-by-Synthesis (SBS) yielded raw data of 4.75 Gb and 5.23 Gb for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively. After filtering and removing adapter sequences from the raw data, 45969831 (45.97 million) and 50836347 (50.84 million) reads comprising of 4542127604 and 5025102762 high quality nucleotide bases for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively, were retained for further assembly. Filtered reads were assembled into contigs using Velvet assembler at a hash length of 45, which generated 75978 and 290284 contigs for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively. Transcript generation was carried out using Oases-0.2.08 for the same hash length that resulted in 69117 and 130043 transcripts for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively. In both cases average contig lengths were of 1646 ± 1210.1 bp and 1363 ± 1139.3 bp with N50 values of 2199 and 1929 in O. sanctum and O. basilicum respectively (Table 1). The average lengths of transcripts generated using Illumina platform in Curcuma longa, cabbage and goosegrass transcriptomes have also been reported with varied lengths of 1304.1 bp, 1419 bp and 1153.74 bp respectively [2123]. The distribution of assembled transcript length ranged from 180 to >5000 bases. Maximum number of transcripts were of 501–1000 bp size with 12640 transcripts (18.29%) followed by 12613 transcripts (18.25%) of 1001–1500 bp size in O. sanctum. Similarly in O. basilicum, 180500 bp size transcripts were of highest in number (31594 transcripts, 24.30%) followed by 27208 transcripts (20.92%) of 501–1000 bp size. In both cases, least number of transcripts 591 (0.86%) in O. sanctum and 641 (0.49%) in O. basilicum were of 4501–5000 bp size (Figure 1A). In root transcriptome of Ipomoea batatas, 65.76% unigenes were in the range of 101–500 bp length followed by 20.79% of transcripts of 501–100 bp length [20], similarly in the case of Medicago sativa, Boehmeria nivea, Apium graveolens and C. longa, Centella asiatica the highest number of transcripts/unigenes were reported with length between 75–500 bp [2123]. Further, transcripts from both Ocimum samples were clustered using CD-HIT-v4.5.4 at 95% identity and query coverage resulting in a total of 130996 transcripts. Blastx search was conducted for assembled sequences of O. sanctum and O. basilicum against uniprot databases and GO terms were assigned for each unigene based on the GO terms annotated to its corresponding homologue in the uniprot database with the proteins of Arabidopsis, rice and lamiaceae family (Table 2; Additional file 1, Additional file 2, Additional file 3). In the case of O. sanctum, 59380 transcripts (86%) were annotated with Arabidopsis, 56753 (82%) with rice and 11704 (17%) with lamiaceae family whereas 104856 (81%), 102721 (79%) and 18427 (14%) O. basilicum transcripts were annotated with Arabidopsis, rice and lamiaceae family, respectively. About 442, 694 and 225 transripts of O. sanctum; and 107, 2601 and 507 transcripts in O. basilicum were uniquely annotated to lamiaceae, Arabidopsis and rice databases, respectively (Figure 1B and C). Number of total transcripts annotated from all databases were 59648 (86.30%) and 105470 (81.10%) for O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively.
Table 1

Summary of RNA-Seq

 

O. sanctum

O. basilicum

Total Number of HQ Reads

45969831

50836347

Total Number of Reads (Mb) in trimmed data

45.97

50.84

Percentage of HQ Reads in trimmed data

100

100

Total Number of Bases in trimmed data

4542127604

5025102762

Percentage of HQ Bases in trimmed data

97.57

98.47

Percentage of Reads with Non- ATGC Characters in trimmed data

0.67

0.66

Total number of transcripts

69117

130043

Average Transcript Length (bp)

1646.4

1363.5

N50 value

2199

1929

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Transcript abundance and length summary of assembled transcripts. (A) Length of the assembled transcripts vs. Number of transcripts. Venn diagram representing datasets from lamiaceae, Arabidopsis and rice databases. (B) Number of shared and unique transcripts among lamiaceae, Arabidopsis and rice databases in O. sanctum. (C) Number of shared and unique transcripts among lamiaceae, Arabidopsis and rice databases in O. basilicum.

Table 2

Annotation summary of O. basilicum and O. sanctum transcripts using Uniprot database

 

UniProt_Lamiaceae

UniProt_Arabidopsis

UniProt/rice

 

O. sanctum

O. basilicum

O. sanctum

O. basilicum

O. sanctum

O. basilicum

Total

11704

18427

59380

104856

56753

102721

GO:MF

9449

15109

38618

67205

35303

62227

GO:CC

2402

3126

33480

58087

25602

44215

GO:BP

4460

5966

31720

54533

26758

46351

Functional classification of Ocimumtranscriptome by GO

Gene Ontology (GO) is an international standardized gene functional classification system offering an updated and a strictly defined concept to comprehensively describe the properties of genes and gene products in any organism [24]. In order to assign putative functions, transcripts from O. sanctum and O. basilicum were compared against the NR protein sequences of Arabidopsis, rice and lamiaceae family available at uniprot database using blastx algorithm. The associated hits were searched for their respective GO. Based on sequence homology, 59380 sequences from O. sanctum and 104856 sequences from O. basilicum were categorized into 51 functional groups under three main categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF) (Figure 2). Highest percentages of genes were classified under ‘unknown groups’ in all the three GO catagories, followed by ‘binding activity’ (42.18% in O. sanctum and 43.12% in O. basilicum), ‘membranes’ (24.03% in O. sanctum and 24.55% in O. basilicum), ‘other biological processes’ (21.62% in O. sanctum and 20.45% in O. basilicum), ‘nucleus’ (13.98% in O. sanctum and 13.23% in O. basilicum) and ‘hydrolase activity’ (11.99% in O. sanctum and 12.94% in O. basilicum) were observed. Reports on Salvia miltiorrhiza transcriptome, a member of the same family, also represents the ‘binding activity’ of the transcripts in MF category to be with maximum percentage with an anomaly in CC and BP categories [25]. Higher number of genes represented in ‘binding and hydrolase activity’ indicates dominance of gene regulation, signal transduction and enzymatically active processes. Extremely low percentage of genes were classified in terms of ‘antioxidant’ (0.02% both in O. sanctum and O. basilicum), ‘transcriptional regulation activity’ (0.1% in O. sanctum and 0.09% in O. basilicum) and ‘localization’ (0.09% in O. sanctum and 0.07% in O. basilicum) categories (Figure 2). Both the libraries showed similar type of distribution pattern of unigenes under different GO terms. This study suggests the existence of huge potential for new gene identification, as a large number of unigenes from O. sanctum and O. basilicum were classified to ‘unknown’ subgroups of the three main categories.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Histogram of gene ontology classification. The results are summarized in three main categories: biological process, cellular component and molecular function. Bars represent assignments of O. basilicum and O. sanctum transcripts (percent) with BLAST matches in the uniprot database (Arabidopsis) to each GO term.

KEGG analysis of Ocimumtranscriptomes

To identify the biological pathways functional in the leaf tissues of O. sanctum and O. basilicum, 69117 and 130043 assembled transcripts from both species were mapped to the reference canonical pathways in KEGG. All transcripts were classified mainly under five categories: metabolism, cellular processes, genetic information processing, environmental information processing and others. Highest number of transcripts from both O. sanctum and O. basilicum were related to metabolism followed by others. In total, all transcripts from O. sanctum and O. basilicum were assigned to 332 KEGG pathways (Additional file 4). Interestingly, 501 and 952 transcripts, respectively, from O. sanctum and O. basilicum were found to be involved in biosynthesis of various secondary metabolites. The cluster for ‘Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [PATH: ko00940]’ and ‘Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis [PATH: ko00900]’ represented the largest group. As observed from Figure 3, the category of ‘terpenoid backbone biosynthesis’ showed highest percentage of transcripts compared to ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’ in O. sanctum (20.56%) where as O. basilicum had highest percentage (17.02%) of transcripts related to ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’. The list of chemicals and activities specifically in the leaf tissues of O. sanctum/tenuiflorum and O. basilicum as displayed in the Dr. Duke’s Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical database (http://sun.ars-grin.gov:8080/npgspub/xsql/duke/findsp.xsql?letter=Ocimum&p_request=Go&amt=sc) also supported the higher percentage of terpenoids in O. sanctum and phenylpropanoids in O. basilicum. From the total compounds in Duke’s database O. sanctum showed a higher percentage of diverse terpenoids (53.1%, 34 types) where as O. basilicum was found to be rich in phenylpropanoids (65.9%, 27 types; Additional file 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

KEGG classification based on secondary metabolism categories. Bracketed numbers represent various secondary metabolic pathways abbreviated as: (1) Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis; (2) Streptomycin biosynthesis; (3) Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid and gingerol biosynthesis; (4) Sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis; (5) Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis; (6) Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; (7) Novobiocin biosynthesis; (8) Monoterpenoid biosynthesis; (9) Limonene and pinene degradation; (10) Isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis; (11) Indole alkaloid biosynthesis; (12) Glucosinolate biosynthesis; (13) Geraniol degradation; (14) Flavonoid biosynthesis; (15) Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis; (16) Diterpenoid biosynthesis; (17) Carotenoid biosynthesis; (18) Caffeine metabolism; (19) Butirosin and neomycin biosynthesis; (20) Brassinosteroid biosynthesis; (21) Biosynthesis; of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides; (22) Biosynthesis of ansamycins; (23) Betalain biosynthesis; (24) Anthocyanin biosynthesis; (25) Zeatin biosynthesis; (26) Tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis; (27) Tetracycline biosynthesis.

Genes related to biosynthesis of different terpenoids and phenylpropanoids

O. sanctum and O. basilicum analyzed in this investigation accumulate different types of phenylpropanoids/terpenoids in the essential oil. O. sanctum contains mainly eugenol (83.56%), β-elemene (7.47%) and β-caryophyllene (6.93%) [26] whereas O. basilicum accumulates methylchavicol (62.54%) and linalool (24.61%) [19]. Precursor molecules for phenylpropanoid biosynthesis are derived from the shikimate pathway (Figure 4) while terpenoid biosynthesis utilizes isoprenoid precursors from cytosolic MVA (mevalonate) as well as plastidial MEP pathways (2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate/1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate/non-mevalonate pathways) (Figure 5) [7]. Uniprot annotations against lamiaceae family were used to identify genes encoding enzymes involved in different steps of phenylpropanoid and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis. Both O. sanctum and O. basilicum annotations comprised of all most all the genes involved in the biosynthesis of essential oil specific phenylproanoids and terpenoids indicating the completeness of transcriptome data (Tables 3, 4 and 5). Higher number of transcripts for 4CL (4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase), ADH (alcohol dehydrogenase), TAT (tyrosine aminotransferase) from phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway and DXS (1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase), GPPS (geranyl diphosphate synthase), and TPS (terpene synthase) were detected for terpenoid biosynthetic pathway. The multiplicity of terpenoids produced by a single plant is achieved both by the expression of multiple TPS genes and by the ability of some TPSs to catalyze the production of multiple products [27]. Evidently, annotation of transcriptome data from both Ocimum species against Arabidopsis and lamiaceae family in uniprot revealed several candidates of probable terpene synthases involved in biosynthesis of terpenoids like- menthofuran, geraniol, limonene, linalool, kaurene, cadinene, selinene, germacrene-D and zingiberene (Figure 6).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway in Ocimum sps. Enzymes found in this study are colored in blue. Graphs represent the average log2fold change observed in the digital gene expression analysis. Abbreviations: DAHPS, 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase; DHQS, 3-dehydroquinate synthase; DHQD, 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase; SD, shikimate dehydrogenase; SK, shikimate kinase; CS, chorismate synthase; CM, chorismate mutase; PAT, prephenate aminotransferase; ADT, arogenate dehydratase; ADH, arogenate dehydrogenase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate: CoA ligase; C3H, p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; CS3′H, p-Coumaroyl shikimate 3′-hydroxylase; CCMT, cinnamate/p-coumarate carboxyl methyltransferase; COMT, caffeoyl O-methyl transferase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyl transferase; CCR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CAAT, coniferyl alcohol acetyl transferase; EGS, eugenol (and chavicol) synthase; TAT, tyrosine aminotransferase; HPPR, hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductase; HPPD, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase; RAS, rosmarinic acid synthase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase; DFR, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; ANS/ LDOX, anthocyanidin synthase; AGT, anthocyanidin 3-O-glucoside 5-O-glucosyltransferase and UFGT, UDP-glucose: flavonoid 7-O-glucosyltransferase.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Mevalonate (MVA) and Non- mevalonate (MEP) biosynthetic pathways in Ocimum sps. Enzymes found in this study are colored in blue. Graphs represent the average log2fold change observed in the digital gene expression analysis. Abbreviations: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; ADS, amorpha-4,11-diene synthase; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; BFS, β-farnesene synthase; CPR, cytochrome P450 reductase; CPS, β-caryophyllene synthase; CYP71AV1, amorphadiene-12-hydroxylase; DBR2, artemisinic aldehyde reductase; ECS, epi-cedrol synthase; FDS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GAS, germacrene A synthase; HMGR, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase; HMGS, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A synthase; IDI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; MVK, mevalonate kinase; PMD, diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase; PMK, phosphomevalonate kinase; SMO, squalene monooxygenase; SQS, squalene synthase; CMK, 4-cytidine 5′-diphospho-2-C-methyl-Derythritol kinase; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; GGDS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; GDS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; HDR, hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase; HDS, hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate synthase; IDI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; MCT, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-(cytidyl-5-diphosphate) transferase; MCS, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase (adapted from Olfosson et al. [67]).

Table 3

Transcript abundance in shikimate pathway derived phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway genes as per the lamiaceae annotation

Phenylpropanoid pathway genes

E.C. No.

Ocimum sanctum

Ocimum basilicum

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

Chavicol O-methyltransferase (CVOMT)

2.1.1.146

4

4.55

2

88.55

Eugenol synthase 1 (EGS)

1.1.1.318

6

15.38

8

42.27

p-Coumaroyl shikimate 3′-hydroxylase (CS3′H)

1.14.13.36

28

15.72

69

8.96

p-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H)

1.14.13.36

15

8.64

29

4.06

Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H)

1.14.13.11

7

34.53

21

11.83

4-Coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL)

6.2.1.12

140

9.52

251

5.65

Alcohol acyltransferase (AAT)

2.3.1.84

18

10.05

35

6.12

Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD)

1.1.1.195

57

15.78

38

24.60

Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR)

1.2.1.44

78

13.48

112

6.90

Rosmarinic acid synthase (RAS)

2.3.1.140

40

13.59

59

6.28

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL)

4.3.1.24

9

91.47

45

11.33

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)

1.1.1.1

101

11.48

226

10.82

Anthocyanidin 3-O-glucoside 5-O-glucosyltransferase (PF3R4)

2.4.1.115

54

11.37

127

3.45

Anthocyanidin synthase (ANS)

1.14.11.19

71

11.47

164

7.45

Cinnamate/p-coumarate carboxyl methyltransferase (CCMT)

2.1.1.-

20

8.12

54

11.01

Caffeoyl CoA O-methyltransferase (CCOMT)

2.1.1.104

16

16.38

36

7.26

Chalcone isomerase (CHI)

5.5.1.6

14

15.92

12

7.51

Chalcone synthase (CHS)

2.3.1.74

29

25.19

72

15.01

Caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase (COMT)

2.1.1.68

8

8.97

13

5.03

3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS)

2.5.1.54

14

48.28

25

18.98

Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR)

1.1.1.219

41

12.33

73

7.42

Flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H)

1.14.11.9

71

14.76

95

8.55

Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H)

1.14.13.21

47

9.19

72

4.12

Glutathione S-transferase (GST)

2.5.1.18

43

24.55

63

13.80

Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HSHCT)

2.3.1.133

5

7.05

13

4.53

Hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT)

2.3.1.99

17

12.94

62

3.92

4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)

1.13.11.27

6

13.73

11

10.70

Hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductase (HPPR)

1.1.1.237

33

7.80

58

7.24

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)

1.10.3.1

6

50.85

19

44.55

Tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT)

2.6.1.5

63

13.96

101

11.58

UDP-glucose: flavonoid 7-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT)

2.4.1.91

17

5.33

79

12.14

Table 4

Transcript abundance of MEP pathway derived terpene biosynthetic pathway genes as per the lamiaceae annotation

MEP pathway genes

E.C. No.

Ocimum sanctum

Ocimum basilicum

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

1-Deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS)

2.2.1.7

24

15.74

45

15.22

1-Deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR)

1.1.1.267

11

15.69

4

50.58

2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase (MCT)

2.7.7.60

3

28.13

7

7.28

4-Diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase (CMK)

2.7.1.148

5

7.73

9

2.66

4-Hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate synthase (HDS)

1.17.7.1

2

112.54

4

40.57

Isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase (IDI)

5.3.3.2

4

24.58

18

7.18

Geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS)

2.5.1.1

15

7.19

21

6.05

Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGPPS)

2.5.1.29

8

6.17

7

5.67

Beta-myrcene synthase (MYS)

4.2.3.15

7

6.66

4

7.09

Limonene synthase (LS)

4.2.3.16

12

3.00

5

13.28

Cineole synthase (CinS2)

4.2.3.108

4

8.80

1

12.20

R-linalool synthase (LIS)

4.2.3.26

9

15.11

14

4.37

(−)-Endo-fenchol synthase (FES)

4.2.3.10

1

0.00

7

2.91

Geraniol synthase (GES)

3.1.7.11

18

5.28

10

32.11

Lavandulyl diphsophate synthase (LPPS)

2.5.1.69

14

13.14

10

58.58

Exo-alpha-bergamotene synthase (BGS)

4.2.3.81

3

10.29

1

2.23

Alpha-zingiberene synthase (ZIS)

4.2.3.65

2

3.82

9

12.43

Gamma-cadinene synthase (CDS)

4.2.3.92

8

34.92

17

3.74

Germacrene-D synthase (GDS)

4.2.3.22

0

0.00

13

1.34

Bicyclogermacrene synthase (Ov-TPS4)

4.2.3.100

4

1.87

1

0.91

Selinene synthase (SES)

4.2.3.86

6

1.68

15

7.53

Kaurene synthase (KS)

4.2.3.19

5

1.49

20

1.63

Copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS)

5.5.1.12

1

0.75

6

1.66

Monoterpene synthase (MTPS)

4.2.3.-

0

0.00

1

0.84

Sesquiterpene synthase (SesqTPS)

4.2.3.-

4

1.43

4

12.81

Terpene synthase (TPS)

4.2.3.-

2

13.13

13

6.83

(+)-Bornyl diphosphate synthase (BPPS)

5.5.1.8

1

0.00

0

10.74

Table 5

Transcript abundance of MVA pathway derived terpene biosynthetic pathway genes as per the lamiaceae annotation

MVA pathway genes

E.C. No.

Ocimum sanctum

Ocimum basilicum

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

No. of transcripts

Avg RPKM

Acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase (AACT)

2.3.1.9

13

14.10

11

26.48

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase (HMGS)

2.3.3.10

7

11.90

14

2.44

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGR)

1.1.1.34

14

7.04

36

12.17

Mevalonate kinase (MVK)

2.7.1.36

3

4.27

2

6.40

5-Phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK)

2.7.4.2

1

11.56

14

3.46

Mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase (MDC)

4.1.1.33

9

20.03

12

1.67

Farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS)

2.5.1.10

2

10.42

7

11.62

Squalene synthase (SQS)

2.5.1.21

13

18.30

7

15.75

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Transcript abundance of terpene synthases in Ocimum sps. Abbreviations: Menthofuran synthase (MFS), geraniol synthase (GES), limonene synthase (LS), linalool synthase (LIS), fenchol synthase (FES), myrcene synthase (MYS), 1,8 cineole synthase (CinS2), (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase (BPPS), cinenol synthase, 3-carene synthase (CAR), monoterpene synthase (MTPS), copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPPS), kaurene synthase (KS), camelliol C synthase (CAMS), beta-amyrin synthase (bAS), selinene synthase (SES), gamma-cadinene synthase (CDS), germacrene-D synthase (GDS), alpha-zingiberene synthase (ZIS), bicyclogermacrene synthase (Ov-TPS4), cis-muuroladiene synthase (MxpSS1), exo-alpha-bergamotene synthase (BGS), gamma-curcumene synthase (PatTpsA), (E)-beta farnesene synthase (FS), putative sesquiterpene synthase (putative TPS) and terpene synthase (TPS).

Recently, presence of pentacyclic triterpenoids like ursolic, oleanolic and betulinic acids has been reported in Ocimum spp. [28]. This non-aromatic class of compounds have pharmacological importance such as anti-HIV, antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities [29]. Like other sesquiterpenoids these triterpenoids also share their origin to farnesyl diphosphate (FDP). FDP is converted to squalene and then to oxidosqualene respectively by squalene synthase (SQS) and squalene epoxidase (SQE) enzymes. Subsequently, oxidosqualene in presence of multifunctional oxidosqualene cyclases (OSCs) viz.α-amyrin synthase (aAS), β-amyrin synthase (bAS) or lupeol synthase (LUP) which are then converted to α-amyrin, β-amyrin or lupeol, respectively. OSCs catalyzing the formation of α-amyrin, also produce β-amyrin, finally synthesizing diverse triterpenoids with the help of CypP450s members. Hence, the bAS expression cannot be directly correlated with the triterpene accumulation. Similar reports of triterpenoids biosynthesis from these OSCs are available from Catharanthus roseus and O. basilicum [30, 31]. In this investigation a total of 12 transcripts from O. basilicum and 8 transcripts from O. sanctum were homologous to β-amyrin synthase as per the Arabidopsis annotation. HPLC analysis from the dried leaves of both the Ocimum species detected oleanolic and ursolic acids however betulinic acid remained undetected. O. sanctum was observed to be having higher content of oleanolic and ursolic acids as compared to O. basilicum (Figure 7A).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Data validation using HPLC and Real Time PCR analysis. (A) Estimation of triterpenoid content in the leaves of O. sanctum and O. basilicum. (B) Validation of the expression pattern of selected pathway genes was carried out using total RNA isolated from O. sanctum and O. basilicum leaf tissues through quantitative Real time PCR. Error bars represent standard deviation between three replicates. (C) Digital gene expression of PAL, CCR, CS3′H, EGS, CVOMT, HPPR, BAS, PMK.

Ocimum spp. is also known to accumulate rosmarinic acid (an ester of caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenyllactic acid), which has various pharmacological properties including antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory activities [32]. Both transcriptomes contained several (32 in O. sanctum; 37 in O. basilicum) transcripts annotated as rosmarinic acid synthase with average RPKM values of 13.6 and 6.3, respectively. To validate differential digital gene expression, 8 genes were randomly selected for quantitative real time PCR (qPCR). These genes (PAL, CCR, CS3′H, EGS, CVOMT, HPPR, BAS and PMK) showed up-regulation in O. basilicum compared to O. sanctum (Figure 7B). All the genes described in this investigation shows up-regulation for O. basilicum in digital gene expression results (Figure 7C). This indicates higher accumulation of metabolites in O. basilicum compared to O. sanctum which is in coherence with the cytological study (Additional file 6). As also discussed earlier, O. basilicum is rich in phenylpropanoids with higher content and array of related compounds, which is also in coherence with the observation on upregulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway genes like PAL, CCR, CS3′H, EGS, CVOMT and HPPR in O. basilicum.

Discovery of candidate CYP450s and transcription factors with probable involvement in phenylpropanoid/terpenoid biosynthesis

Cytochrome P450s (CYP450s) are reported to be nature’s most versatile biological catalysts forming the biggest gene families in plants accounting for more than 1% of the total gene annotations in individual plant species [33]. These are generally involved in the biosynthesis of terpenoids, sterols, lignins, hormones, fatty acids, pigments, and phytoalexins in plants [34]. These genes are also the subject of analysis in many of the de novo transcriptome sequencing projects in an effort to unravel novel functions of CYPs [24, 25, 35]. Through uniprot annotation against Arabidopsis, a total of 386 and 801 transcripts were identified from O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively resembling CYPs. However, against lamiaceae family annotation, only 231 transcripts from O. sanctum and 542 from O. basilicum were identified as members of CYP450 gene family. Out of total Arabidopsis database annotated transcripts, 203 transcripts were exclusively annotated to O. sanctum and 416 transcripts to O. basilicum, whereas 48 and 157 transcripts were found unique to O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively in case of the lamiaceae annotations. Apart from the total and exclusive transcripts, 183 transcripts from O. sanctum and 385 transcripts in O. basilicum were annotated against both Arabidopsis and lamiaceae family in uniprot. All the CYP450s involved in the secondary metabolism were classified under 26 gene families viz. CYP51, CYP57, CYP71, CYP72, CYP73, CYP75, CYP76, CYP81, CYP82, CYP84, CYP85, CYP90, CYP91, CYP93, CYP94, CYP95, CYP96, CYP98, CYP706, CYP707, CYP710, CYP711, CYP712, CYP716, CYP721 and CYP734 (Table 6 and 7) with diverse functions in phenylpropanoids and terpenoid metabolism. Among all the CYP families classified, the maximum number of transcripts in both the Ocimum sp. belonged to CYP71 family with most abundant CYP71A5 transcripts. Recently, the role(s) of genes of CYP82 and CYP93 families were worked out and described to be involved in flavonoid biosynthesis [36]. Additionally, transcripts of CYP716A class were also identified to be the members of multifunctional oxidases involved in triterpenoids (ursolic, oleanolic and betulinic acids) biosynthesis [37].
Table 6

Numbers of transcripts encoding cytochrome P450s involved in phenylpropanoid metabolism

 

CYP transcripts of O. sanctum

CYP transcripts of O. basilicum

Functions

Arabidopsisannotation

Lamiaceae annotation

Arabidopsisannotation

Lamiaceae annotation

CYP72A14

2

-

8

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism

CYP73A1

5

7

23

33

Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H)

CYP75B1

8

-

8

-

Flavonoid biosynthesis

CYP81D1

2

-

16

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism

CYP81F3

1

-

9

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism

CYP84A1

2

-

1

-

Coniferaldehyde 5-hydroxylase

CYP93D1

-

-

1

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism

CYP98A3

12

-

25

-

4-Coumaryl shikimic/quinic ester 3′-hydroxylase.

CYP98A14

-

16

-

46

p-Coumaryl shikimate hydroxylase

CYP707A2

5

-

4

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism (abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase)

CYP707A3

12

-

13

-

Secondary metabolism (abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase)

CYP710A1

3

-

7

-

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism

CYP711A1

1

-

1

-

Core phenylpropanoid metabolism

CYP712A1

-

-

2

-

Stilbene, coumarine and lignin biosynthesis

Table 7

Numbers of transcripts encoding cytochrome P450s involved in terpenoid metabolism

 

CYP transcripts of O. sanctum

CYP transcripts of O. basilicum

Functions

Arabidopsisannotation

Lamiaceae annotation

Arabidopsisannotation

Lamiaceae annotation

CYP51G1

4

-

13

-

Obtusifoliol 14α-demethylase

CYP71A-like

1

-

9

-

(+)-Menthofuran synthase

CYP71B12

-

-

1

-

Biosynthesis of prenyl diphosphates

CYP71B31

1

-

-

-

Mono-/sesqui-/di-terpene biosynthesis

CYP71D13/ D15

-

10

-

16

(−)-Limonene-3-hydroxylase

CYP71D18

-

45

-

43

(−)-Limonene-6-hydroxylase

CYP71 with unknown function

43

99

113

237

Unknown function

CYP72A15

26

-

48

-

Carotenoid biosynthesis

CYP76C3

3

-

8

-

Monoterpene biosynthesis

CYP76C4

-

-

2

-

Mono-/sesqui-/di-terpene biosynthesis

CYP82G1

1

-

2

-

Mono-/sesqui-/di-terpene biosynthesis

CYP85A2

4

-

-

-

Brassinosteroid biosynthesis

CYP90B1

-

-

1

-

Triterpene, sterol, and brassinosteroid metabolism

CYP90C1

2

-

8

-

Steroid biosynthesis

CYP94D2

5

-

6

-

Carotenoid biosynthesis

CYP96A9

1

-

-

-

Mono-/sesqui-/di-terpene biosynthesis

CYP706A7

-

-

4

-

Biosynthesis of steroids

CYP707A4

10

-

14

-

Sterol biosynthesis

CYP716A2

-

-

1

-

Monoterpene biosynthesis

CYP734A1

3

-

1

-

Triterpene, sterol, and brassinosteroid metabolism

Transcription factors (TFs) are sequence specific DNA-binding proteins interacting with the promoter regions of target genes to modulate their expression. In plants, these proteins play a very important role in regulation of plant development, reproduction, intercellular signalling, response to environment, cell cycle and are also important in the modulation of secondary metabolites biosynthesis [38]. In recent years, many studies have been reported on the involvement of various TF families like bHLH, bZIP, Zinc fingers, MYB, ARF, HSF, WRKY, HB and NAC in regulation of secondary metabolites and plant stress responses [25, 39]. As phenylpropanoids and terpenoids are the main determinants of aroma and flavour in Ocimum, it becomes important to investigate the transcriptional regulation of the genes involved their biosynthesis, which can further be used to modulate the pathway and develop phenylpropanoid or terpenoid enriched chemotypes. A few transcription factors from other plants, eg. EMISSION OF BENZENOIDS I (EOBI), EMISSION OF BENZENOIDS II (EOBII), and ODORANT 1 (ODO 1), MYB4, members of R2R3-MYB family regulate benzenoid/phenylpropanoid volatile biosynthesis in Petunia hybrida [40, 41]. ORCA2 and AP2 family member, MYC2, a bHLH family member and WRKY1 regulate indole alkaloid and terpenoid biosynthesis pathway in Catharanthus roseus [42, 43]. Similarly, a wound inducible WRKY transcription factor from Papaver somniferum was suggested to be involved in benzylisoquinoline biosynthetic pathway [44]. Also, in Lamiaceae family plants like Salvia miltiorrhiza and Perilla frutescens, TFs belonging to bHLH family are reported to be involved in phenypropanoid biosynthesis pathway [45, 46]. In the present investigation TFs were classified according to uniprot annotation for Arabidopsis family. A total of 3489 (5.9%) and 6074 (5.8%) transcripts in O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively were grouped into 40 TF families (Figure 8). Those which were annotated to have sequence specific transcription factor activity but cannot be grouped among any family were included in ‘other’ TFs category, following Arabidopsis transcription factor database (http://Arabidopsis.med.ohio-state.edu/AtTFDB/) and Plant transcription factor database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [47] classification. A systematic analysis of these transcription factors would help in understanding differential regulation of terpenoid and phenypropanoid pathways.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-588/MediaObjects/12864_2014_Article_6319_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Distribution of transcripts encoding different transcription factors from O. sanctum and O. basilicum. Abbreviations: basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH), Homeodomain (HB), Zinc finger-Homeobox containing proteins (ZN-HD), MYB, APETELLA 2/Etheylene Responsive factor/Dehydration Responsive Element Binding proteins (AP2/ERF/DREB), basic leucine zipper (bZIP), WRKY, C2C2 [contains DNA binding with one finger (Dof), GATA binding proteins(GATA), Yabby, B-box, Constants-like protein (COL)], (CX2-4CX3FX5LX2HX3-5H)zinc-finger domain containing proteins (C2H2), MYB related, CCAAT binding (CCAAT), MADS- box containing (MADS), SCARECROW (GRAS), Heat Stress Factors (HSF), Auxin Regulatory Factor (ARF), calmodulin binding (CAMTA), PHD type Zinc finger protein (PHD), [TB1(teosinte branched 1), CYC (cycloidea) and PCF family genes] (TCP), Squamosa promoter binding protein (SBP), Arabidopsis Response Regulators/ B-motif (GARP-like motif) binding (ARR-B), Auxin induced factors (AUX/IAA), NLP, Growth Regulating factors (GRF/GIF), TUBBY like protein (TUB), trihelix DNA-binding domains (TRIHELIX), Basic Pentacysteine (BBR/BPC), High mobility group (HMG1/2)/ARID/BRIGHT DNA-binding domain-containing protein (HMG/ARID), Brassinosteroid (BR) repressor (BZR), Golden2-like (G2-like), Ethylene-insensitive-like (EIL), Jumonji (jmj)/zinc finger (C5HC2 type) (JUMONJI),FAR, RAV, Cys3His zinc finger domain containing protein (C3H), Vascular Plant Zinc Finger protein (VOZ), Cystein-rich polycomb-like protein (CPP), GLABROUS1 enhancer-binding protein (GeBP).

Cytogenetic characterization of O. sanctum and O. basilicum

There have been discrepancies regarding the chromosome number of Ocimum in literature. Darlington and Wylie [48] and Mehra and Gill [49] considered x = 8 as basic chromosome number for the genus Ocimum as a whole, while some other authors suggested that Ocimum species are characterized by the different basic chromosome numbers x = 8, 10, 12, or 16 [50]. In order to establish the actual chromosome numbers for the two varieties used in this study, fast growing roots emerging from stem cuttings were examined for somatic chromosome number. Observations recorded from root-tip mitosis reveal somatic chromosome count of 2n = 16 for O. sanctum and 2n = 48 for O. basilicum and chromosome size below 1 μm (Additional file 6). As the essential oil of the genus Ocimum is the reservoir of secondary metabolites, there may be a probable correlation between the chromosome numbers of species and its essential oil yield, which may in turn be affected by expression of related genes. Indeed, DGE and real-time expression analyses showed higher expression of pathway genes in O. basilicum compared to O. sanctum (Figures 4, 5, 7). Moreover, the ploidy level has been shown to enhance the accumulation of secondary metabolites in Cymbopogon [51]. As reported earlier, O. basilicum (var: CIM-Saumya) shows more vigorous growth and higher oil content (0.99%) compared to O. sanctum (var: CIM-Ayu) with 0.70% oil content [19, 26].

Analysis of GC content and identification of SSR Markers

Next generation sequencing also offers an opportunity for the analysis of GC content among transcripts and expands the scope for molecular markers such as SSRs. GC content is an important indicator of the genomic composition including evolution, gene structure (intron size and number), gene regulation and stability of DNA [52]. Average GC contents of O. sanctum and O. basilicum transcripts were analyzed to be 47.12% and 46.39%, respectively (Additional file 7), which is in the range of GC levels of coding sequences in dicots (44-47%) [53]. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) markers have proven to be valuable tools for various applications in genetics and breeding for the better understanding of genetic variation. As described, more than 150 species [1, 2] of Ocimum are reported around the world and hence, polymorphic SSR markers are important for investigations related to genetic diversity, relatedness, evolution, linkage mapping, comparative genomics and gene-based association studies. Transcriptome SSR markers also exhibit high inter-specific transferability [54]. Genus Ocimum is highly prone to cross pollination and hence the seed raised population will have variability in metabolite content [10]. The identification of SSRs in Ocimum sp. will help in distinguishing closely related individuals and will also provide useful criteria for enriching and analyzing variation in the gene pool of both the plants. Even though SNPs serve as excellent markers especially for high-throughput mapping and studying complex genetic traits, SSRs provide a number of advantages over other marker systems. SSRs with their moderate density still serve as the best co-dominant marker system for construction of framework linkage maps [55]. The transcripts from the data of present investigation were also found to have abundant SSRs. Out of 69117 and 130043 transcripts of O. sanctum and O. basilicum, 27.77% transcripts (19191) from O. sanctum and 17.79% (23141) transcripts from O. basilicum were observed to be having SSRs (Table 8 and Additional file 8). The total number of SSR containing sequences in O. sanctum and O. basilicum were 26232 (37.95%) and 28947 (22.26%), respectively. Following the criteria used to identify these SSRs, di-nucleotide repeats were highest in number for both the species (14.64% in O. sanctum and 6.94% in O. basilicum), while penta-nucleotide repeats were of lowest occurrence (0.16%) in O. sanctum and hexa-nucleotide repeats (0.08%) in O. basilicum. The most prevalent dinucleotide SSRs group had the highest occurrence of CT, TC, AG and GA repeats followed by trinucleotide (7.03%) SSRs in O. sanctum, while in O. basilicum TC, CT, AG and GA dinucleotide repeats were highest. Interestingly, several SSR motifs were linked with unique sequences encoding enzymes (e.g. COMT, HPPR, HPPD, PPO, HSHCT, CinS2, ZIS, BGS, LPPS, CDS, MYS, LIS, AAT2, IDI, HDS, DXR, SQS, AACT) involved in terpenoid/phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (Additional file 9). Maximum number of SSRs was observed in 4CL transcripts of O. sanctum where as SSR number was abundant in ANS transcripts of O. basilicum. The gene specific identification of SSRs in both the Ocimum sp. will help in distinguishing closely related individuals and will also provide useful criteria for enriching and analyzing variation in the gene pool of the plant. Similarly, mining of SNPs from NGS-generated transcripts mainly involves clustering and assembling the sequence reads, followed by SNP identification by means of in silico approaches [56]. In this investigation, a total of 3245 (66.16%) transitions and 1660 (33.84%) transversions were observed by the SNP finder tool with O. sanctum as anchor (Table 9 and Additional file 10).
Table 8

Statistics of SSRs identified from O. basilicum and O. sanctum leaf transcriptome data

 

O. sanctum

O. basilicum

Total number of sequences examined

69117

130043

Total size of examined sequences (bp)

113791599

177312343

Total number of identified SSRs

26232

28947

Number of SSR containing sequences

19191

23141

Number of sequences containing more than 1 SSR

5128

4383

Number of SSRs present in compound formation

2301

2091

Di-nucleotide repeat

10118

9025

Tri-nucleotide repeat

4859

6029

Tetra-nucleotide repeat

314

363

Penta-nucleotide repeat

109

115

Hexa-nucleotide repeat

223

107

Table 9

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) statistics

Summary of SNPs statistics

Number

Percentage (%)

Tot. no. of Transitions

3245

66.16

A < − > G Transitions

1602

32.66

C < − > T Transitions

1643

33.50

Tot. no. of Transversions

1660

33.84

A < − > T Transversions

538

10.97

G < − > T Transversions

363

7.40

C < − > G Transversions

369

7.52

A < − > C Transversions

390

7.95

Tot. no. of SNPs

6565

 

Conclusion

Terpenoids and phenylpropanoids are the predominant secondary metabolites in Ocimum species. These metabolites are synthesized through metabolic divergence from the mevalonate/non-mevalonate and shikimate pathways, respectively, and accumulate in the specialized glandular trichomes on the leaves [7]. So, this study was undertaken with the objective of enriching the existing limited set of genomic resources in Ocimum, and to provide a comparative analysis of transcriptomes of two Ocimum species having contrasting essential oil composition. To this end, high quality transcriptome database was established for O. sanctum and O. basilicum by using NGS technology. This is the first report of a comprehensive transcriptome analysis of Ocimum species. Genes encoding pathway enzymes related to aromatic components such as volatile terpenoids, phenylpropanoids and non-volatile medicinal compounds such as pentacyclic triterpenes and rosmarinic acid were identified in the transcriptome database; indicating the importance of exploring Ocimum species as a source of both medicinal and aromatic compounds. Moreover, several putative CYPs and transcription factors with probable involvement in the biosynthesis and regulation of terpenoids and phenylpropanoids were identified. Further investigations on these putative CYPs and TFs may reveal the reasons behind differential accumulation of phenylpropanoids/terpenoids, along with the similarity/difference in biosynthetic pathways operating in different species of Ocimum. Additionally, several SNPs and SSRs were identified in both the transcriptomes which will assist in breeding of Ocimum for developing distinct chemotypes. Overall, Ocimum transcriptome databases presented here, both individually and collectively, can be exploited to characterize genes related to phenylproanoid and terpenoid metabolism and their regulation, as well as for breeding chemotypes with unique essential oil composition in this largely cross-pollinating species.

Methods

Plant material, library preparation and sequencing

Leaf tissues of O. sanctum L. (var: CIM Ayu) and O. basilicum L. (var: CIM Saumya) were collected from three month old plants grown in the experimental farm at the Bangalore Resource Centre of CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. TRIzol method was used for RNA isolation from the leaf tissues. The quality and quantity of total RNA was calculated with a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA); high-quality (RNA Integrity Number >7) RNA was used. The cDNAs were amplified according to the Illumina RNA-Seq protocol and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq1000 system, producing 45.97 and 50.84 Mbp of 100-bp paired-end reads for O. sanctum and O. basilicum respectively. Transcriptome library for sequencing was constructed according to the Illumina TruSeq RNA library protocol outlined in “TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Guide” (Part # 15008136; Rev. A; Nov 2010). Enriched Poly-A RNA (1 μg) using RNA Purification Beads was fragmented for 4 minutes at elevated temperature (94°C) in the presence of divalent cations and reverse transcribed with Superscript III reverse transcriptase by priming with Random Hexamers (Invitrogen, USA). Second strand cDNA was synthesized in the presence of DNA polymerase I and RNaseH. The cDNA was cleaned up using Agencourt Ampure XP SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter, USA) followed by ligation of “Illumina Adapters” to the cDNA molecules, after end repair and addition of “A”- base. Following SPRI cleanup after ligation, the library was amplified using 11 cycles of PCR, for enrichment of adapter ligated fragments. The prepared library was quantified using Nanodrop and validated for quality by running an aliquot on High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer Chip (Agilent).

De novoassembly and sequence clustering

Raw reads obtained after sequencing were subjected to adapter, B-block and low quality base filtering to obtain the processed reads. De novo assembly of the processed reads was carried out using Velvet_1.2.10 for different hash lengths (45–73) [57]. Velvet takes in short reads and assembles them into contigs using paired-end information. This assembly was used by “observed-insert-length.pl” and “estimate-exp_cov.pl” (from Velvet package) to estimate insert length and expected coverage parameters, which were then used to generate a final assembly. The resulting contigs were assembled into transcripts by Oases-0.2.01 for the same (45–73) hash lengths [58], using the assembly from Velvet and clustering them into small groups (loci). It then uses paired end information to construct transcript isoforms. Transcript assembly was selected for the best hash length based on the assembly statistics and the transcripts from both the samples were clustered together using CD-HIT-v4.5.4 at 95% identity and 95% query coverage [59]. The transcriptome data for both the species was submitted to the NCBI under SRA Study accession number SRP039008 for O. sanctum and SRP039533 for O. basilicum).

Sequence annotation and functional characterization

Assembled transcripts were blasted against UniProt databases and GO (Gene Ontology) terms were assigned for each unigene based on the GO terms annotated to its corresponding homologue in the UniProt database with the proteins of Arabidopsis, Rice and Lamiaceae family. Each annotated sequence may have more than one GO term, assigned either for different GO categories (Biological Process, Molecular Function and Cellular Component) or in the same category [60]. To gain an overview of gene pathway networks, the assigned polypeptides encoded by unigenes from O. sanctum and O. basilicum transcriptome were mapped to metabolic pathways according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [61]. The output of KEGG analysis includes KEGG orthology (KO) assignments using KEGG automated annotation server, KAAS (http://www.genome.jp/kaas-bin/kaas_main?mode=partial).

Read mapping and transcript abundance measurement

RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per Million) measurement is a sensitive approach by which expression level of even poorly expressed transcripts can be detected using read count as the fundamental basis. For RPKM measurement, reads were first aligned using “Bowtie tool” [62] and “Awk scripting” was used to generate the read count profile from the output file (.sam) of Bowtie alignment. RPKM values were calculated applying the approach adopted by Mortazvi and co-workers [63], to measure the expression level of each assembled transcript sequence. The clustered transcripts were used as the master reference for carrying out the digital gene expression (DGE) analysis by employing a negative binomial distribution model (DESeq v1.8.1 package (http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/DESeq/) [64].

Cytological analysis

Stem cuttings of the O. sanctum (var. CIM Ayu) and O. basilicum (var. CIM Saumya) were transplanted in moist sand. The fast growing 1 cm long young roots emerging from the stem cuttings were excised and pre-treated for 2.5 h in saturated aqueous solution of p-dichloro benzene at 12–14°C, washed thoroughly in water and quickly transferred to Carnoy's mixture (6:3:1) for fixation overnight at room temperature. Next day the fixed roots were transferred to 45% acetic acid for 10 minutes, and thereafter stained in 2% acetocarmine for 2 hrs at 60°C and then overnight at room temperature. The stained root tips were squashed in 45% acetic acid and permanent chromosome preparations were made by removing the cover glass by quick-freeze method followed by dehydration in tertiary butyl alcohol series and mounting in DPEX.

Real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from both O. sanctum and O. basilicum leaves of same stage and cDNAs were prepared using RevertAid first strand cDNA synthesis Kit (ThermoScientific, USA). Expression of selected pathway genes and cytochrome P450s was analyzed through qPCR using Fast Real Time PCR System (7900HT Applied Biosystems, USA) and Maxima SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (2X) (ThermoScientific, Waltham MA, US) to validate Illumina sequencing data. Each PCR reaction was set up in 15 μl volume containing 7.5 μl of Maxima SYBR Green PCR master mix, 50 ng of cDNA sample prepared using RevertAid first strand cDNA synthesis Kit (ThermoScientific) and gene-specific primers (Additional file 11). The specificity of the reactions was verified by melting curve analysis with the thermal cycling parameters: initial hold (50°C for 2 min); initial denaturation (95°C for 10 min); and 40 amplification cycles (95°C for 15 s; and 60°C for 1 min) followed by additional steps (60°C for 15 s, 95°C for 15 s and 37°C for 2 min). Relative mRNA levels were quantified with respect to the reference gene ‘actin’ of O. sanctum (SO_2009_transcript16212) [65]. Sequence Detection System (SDS) software version 2.2.1 was used for relative quantification of gene transcripts using the ΔΔCQ method. Threshold cycle (Cq) values obtained after real-time PCR were used for calculation of the ΔCq value (target-reference). The quantification was carried out by calculating ΔΔCq to determine the fold difference in gene expression [ΔCq target – ΔCq calibrator]. The RQ was determined as 2 –ΔΔCQ. All the experiments were repeated using three biological replicates and the data were analyzed statistically (±Standard Deviation).

Estimation of triterpenoid content

Methanolic extract of 0.5 g dried leaf powder was used for estimation of triterpenoids mainly oleanoleic, ursolic and betulinic acids. HPLC was performed as per previously reported method with slight modification [66] with an instrument (Shimadzu, Japan), consisting of an analytical column (Waters Spherisorb ODS-2, 250 × 4.6 mm, 10 μm), pumps (LC-10AT), autoinjector (SIL-10 AD) and PDA (SPD-M10A). Mobile phase composition used was acetonitrile– water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (85:15 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The quantitation was performed at 204 nm as reported earlier.

Identification of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs)

All the transcripts of O. sanctum and O. basilicum were analyzed with a microsatellite program, MISA (http://pgrc.ipkgatersleben.de/misa/) for identification of SSR motifs having mononucleotide to hexanucleotide repeats. The parameters used for simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were, at least 6 repeats for di- and 5 for tri-, tetra, penta- and hexa- nucleotide. Transitions and transversions identification between O. sanctum and O. basilicum was carried out using SNPs Finder tool taking O. sanctum as anchor (http://snpsfinder.lanl.gov/).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CSIR- Twelfth Five Year Plan Project (BSC0107 and BSC0203). The authors express their sincere gratitude to Director, CSIR-CIMAP for his keen interest and support. The plant material provided by NGBMAP and NGS by Genotypic Technology (P) Ltd (Bangalore, India) are also acknowledged. There is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biotechnology Divison, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
(2)
Metabolic and Structural Biology Divison, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP
(3)
Genetics and Plant Breeding Divison, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP
(4)
Analytical Chemistry Divison, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP

References

  1. Paton A, Harley RM, Harley MM: Ocimum- an overview of relationships and classification. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-Industrial Profiles. Edited by: Holm Y, Hiltunen R. 1999, Amsterdam: The Netherlands: Harwood Academic, 1-8.Google Scholar
  2. Sahoo Y, Pattnaik SK, Chand PK: In vitro clonal propagation of an aromatic medicinal herb Ocimum basilicum L. (sweet basil) by axillary shoot proliferation. In Vitro Plant. 1997, 33: 293-296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. GRINa. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?25491#dist,
  4. GRINb. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?25478,
  5. Singh N, Hoette Y, Miller R: Tulsi- The Mother Medicine of Nature. 2002, Lucknow, India: International Institute of Herbal MedicineGoogle Scholar
  6. Makri O, Kintzios S: Ocimum sp. (Basil): Botany, Cultivation, Pharmaceutical Properties, and Biotechnology. J Herbs Spices Medicinal Plants. 2008, 13 (3): 123-150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Iijima Y, Davidovich-Rikanati R, Fridman E, Gang DR, Bar E, Lewinsohn E, Pichersky E: The biochemical and molecular basis for the divergent patterns in the biosynthesis of terpenoids and phenylpropanoids in the peltate glands of three cultivars of basil. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 3724-3736.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rahman S, Islam R, Kamruzzaman AK, Jamal AHM: Ocimum sanctum L.: A review of phytochemical and pharmacological profile. Am J Drug Discov Dev. 2011, ISSN 2150-427x/doi:10.3923/ajdd.2011Google Scholar
  9. Jaggi RK, Madaan R, Singh B: Anticonvulsant potential of holy basil, Ocimum sanctum Linn, and its cultures. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003, 41: 1329-1333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pattanayak P, Behera P, Das D, Panda SK: Ocimum sanctum Linn. A reservoir plant for therapeutic applications: An overview. Pharmacogn Rev. 2010, 4 (7): 95-105.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Charles DJ, Simon JE: A new geraniol chemotype of Ocimum gratissimum L. J Essential Oil Res. 1992, 4: 231-234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Obeng-Ofori D, Reichmuth C: Bioactivity of eugenol, a major component of essential oil of Ocimum suave (Wild.) against four species of stored-product Coleoptera. Int J Pest Manag. 1997, 43: 89-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Werker E, Putievsky E, Ravid U, Dudai N, Katzir I: Glandular hairs and essential oil in developing leaves of Ocimum basilicum L. (Lamiaceae). Ann Bot. 1993, 71: 43-50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Siddiqui BS, Bhatti HA, Begum S, Perwaiz S: Evaluation of the antimycobacterium activity of the constituents from Ocimum basilicum against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 144 (1): 220-222.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Beshbishy H, Bahashwan S: Hypoglycemic effect of basil (Ocimum basilicum) aqueous extract is mediated through inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities: an in vitro study. Toxicol Ind Health. 2012, 28 (1): 42-50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Parkinson J, Blaxter M: Expressed sequence tags: An overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 533: 1-12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, Snyder M: The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science. 2008, 320: 1344-1349.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins LJ, Biggs PJ, Voelckel C, Joly S: An approach to transcriptome analysis of non-model organisms using short-read sequences. Genome Inform. 2008, 21: 3-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lal RK, Khanuja SPS, Agnihotri AK, Shasany AK, Naqvi AA, Dwivedi S, Mishra HO, Dhawan OP, Kalra A, Singh A, Bahl JR, Singh S, Patra DD, Agarwal S, Darokar MP, Gupta AK, Gupta ML, Chandra R: An early, short duration, high essential oil, methyl chavicol and linalool yielding variety of Indian basil (Ocimum basilicum) ‘CIM-Saumya’. J Med Arom Plant Sci. 2004, 26: 77-78.Google Scholar
  20. Wang Z, Fang B, Chen J, Zhang X, Luo Z, Huang L, Chen X, Li Y: De novo assembly and characterization of root transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of cSSR markers in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 726-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Annadurai RS, Neethiraj R, Jayakumar V, Damodaran AC, Rao SN, Katta MAVSK, Gopinathan S, Sarma SP, Senthilkumar V, Niranjan V, Gopinath A, Mugasimangalam RC: De Novo transcriptome assembly (NGS) of Curcuma longa L. rhizome reveals novel transcripts related to anticancer and antimalarial terpenoids. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (2): e56217-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056217PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim HA, Lim CJ, Kim S, Choe JK, Jo S-H, Baek N, Kwon S-Y: High-Throughput Sequencing and De Novo assembly of Brassica oleracea var. Capitata L. for transcriptome Analysis. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (3): e92087-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092087PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. An J, Shen X, Ma Q, Yang C, Liu S, Chen Y: Transcriptome profiling to discover putative genes associated with paraquat resistance in goosegrass (Eleusine indica L.). PLoS One. 2014, 9 (6): e99940-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099940PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gahlan P, Singh HR, Shankar R, Sharma N, Kumari A, Chawla V, Ahuja PS, Kumar S: De novo sequencing and characterization of Picrorhiza kurrooa transcriptome at two temperatures showed major transcriptome adjustments. BMC Genomics. 2012, 13: 126-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang L, Ding G, Lin H, Cheng H, Kong Y, Wei Y, Fang X, Liu R, Wang L, Chen X, Yang C: Transcriptome analysis of medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza and identification of genes related to tanshinone biosynthesis. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (11): e80464-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080464PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lal RK, Khanuja SPS, Agnihotri AK, Misra HO, Shasany AK, Naqvi AA, Dhawan OP, Kalra A, Bahl JR, Darokar MP: High yielding eugenol rich oil producing variety of Ocimum sanctum – CIM-Ayu. J Med Arom Plant Sci. 2003, 25: 746-747.Google Scholar
  27. Nagegowda DA: Plant volatile terpenoid metabolism: Biosynthetic genes, transcriptional regulation and subcellular compartmentation. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584: 2965-2973.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jager S, Trojan H, Kopp T, Laszczyk MN, Scheffler A: Pentacyclic triterpenoid distribution in various plants – rich sources for a new group of multi-potent plant extracts. Molecules. 2009, 14: 2016-2031.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Razborsek MI, Voncina DB, Dolecek V, Voncina E: Determination of oleanolic, betulinic and ursolic acid in lamiaceae and mass spectral fragmentation of their trimethylsilylated derivatives. Chromatographia. 2008, 67: 5/6-doi:10.1365/s10337-008-0533-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang L, Li J, Ye H, Li C, Wang H, Liu B, Zhang Y: Molecular characterization of the pentacyclic triterpenoid biosynthetic pathway in Catharanthus roseus. Planta. 2012, 236 (5): 1571-1581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Misra RC, Maiti P, Chanotiya CS, Shanker K, Ghosh S: Methyl jasmonate-elicited transcriptional responses and pentacyclic triterpenoid biosynthesis in sweet basil. Plant Physiol. 2014, doi:10.1104/pp. 113.232884Google Scholar
  32. Kiferle C, Lucchesini M, Mensuali-Sodi A, Maggini R, Raffaelli A, Pardossi A: Rosmarinic acid content in basil plants grown in vitro and in hydroponics. Cent Eur J Biol. 2011, 6 (6): 946-957.Google Scholar
  33. Coon MJ: Cytochrome P450: nature’s most versatile biological catalyst. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005, 45: 1-25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Meijer AH, Souer E, Verpoorte R, Hoge JHC: Isolation of cytochrome P450 cDNA clones from the higher plant Catharanthus roseus by a PCR strategy. Plant Mol Biol. 1993, 22: 379-383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gupta P, Goel R, Pathak S, Srivastava A, Singh SP, Sangwan RS, Asif MH, Trivedi PK, Sangwan RS, Asif MH, Trivedi PK: De novo assembly, functional annotation and comparative analysis of Withania somnifera leaf and root transcriptomes to identify putative genes involved in the withanolides biosynthesis. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (5): e62714-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062714PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Berim A, Gang DR: The roles of a flavone 6-hydroxylase and 7-O-demethylation in the flavone biosynthetic network of sweet basil. J Biol Chem. 2013, 288 (3): 1795-1805.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Fukushima EO, Seki H, Ohyama K, Ono E, Umemoto N, Mizutani M, Saito K, Muranaka T: CYP716A Subfamily Members are Multifunctional Oxidases in Triterpenoid Biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52 (12): 2050-2061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuan L, Perry SE: Plant Transcription Factors. Meth Protocol Mol Biol. 2011, 754 (XI): 347-Google Scholar
  39. Naika M, Shameer K, Mathew OK, Gowda R, Sowdhamini R: STIFDB2- An updated version of plant stress-responsive transcription factor database with additional stress signals, stress-responsive transcription factor binding sites and stress-responsive genes in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54 (2): 1-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Colquhoun TA, Kim JY, Wedde AE, Levin LA, Schmitt KC, Schuurink RC, Clark DG: PhMYB4 fine-tunes the floral volatile signature of PetuniaXhybrida through PhC4H. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62 (3): 1133-1143.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Spitzer-Rimon B, Farhi M, Albo B, Cna’ani A, Ben Zvi MM, Masci T, Edelbaum O, Yu Y, Shklarman E, Ovadis M, Vainstein A: The R2R3-MYB-like regulatory factor EOBI, acting downstream of EOBII, regulates scent production by activating ODO1 and structural scent-related genes in petunia. Plant Cell. 2012, 24 (12): 5089-5105.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Suttipanta N, Pattanaik S, Kulshrestha M, Patra B, Singh SK, Yuan L: The transcription factor CrWRKY1 positively regulates the terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157 (4): 2081-2093.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Li J, Blue R, Zeitler B, Strange TL, Pearl JR, Huizinga DH, Evans S, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Petolino JF: Activation domains for controlling plant gene expression using designed transcription factors. Pl Biot J. 2013, 11: 671-680.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Mishra S, Triptahi V, Singh S, Phukan UJ, Gupta MM, Shanker K, Shukla RK: Wound induced tanscriptional regulation of benzylisoquinoline pathway and characterization of wound inducible PsWRKY transcription factor from Papaver somniferum. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (1): e52784-doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052784PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Gong Z, Yamagishi E, Yamazaki M, Saito K: A constitutively expressed Myc-like gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis from Perilla frutescens: molecular characterization, heterologous expression in transgenic plants and transactivation in yeast cells. Plant Mol Biol. 1999, 41: 33-44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang W, Jiang X, Zhang L, Chen P, Shen Y, Huang L: Isolation and characteristic of SmbHLH1 gene in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2011, 36 (24): 3416-3420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jin JP, Zhang H, Kong L, Gao G, Luo JC: PlantTFDB 3.0- a portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42 (D1): D1182-D1187.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Darlington CD, Wylie AP: Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. 1995, London: George Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar
  49. Mehra PN, Gill LS: Cytology of west Himalayan Labiatae, tribe Ocimoideae. Cytologia. 1972, 37: 53-57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Carovic’-Stanko K, Liber Z, Besendorfer V, Javornik B, Bohanec B, Kolak I, Satovic Z: Genetic relations among basil taxa (Ocimum L.) based on molecular markers, nuclear DNA content, and chromosome number. Plant Syst Evol. 2010, 285: 13-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lavania UC, Srivastava S, Lavania S, Basu S, Misra NK, Mukai Y: Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitate enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation. Plant J. 2012, 71 (4): 539-549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Carels N, Hatey P, Jabbari K, Bernardi G: Compositional properties of homologous coding sequences from plants. J Mol Evol. 1998, 46: 45-53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Vinogradov AE: DNA helix: the importance of being GC-rich. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 1838-1844.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wei W, Qi X, Wang L, Zhang Y, Hua W, Li D, Lv H, Zhang X: Characterization of the sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) global transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 451-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Verma P, Shah N, Bhatia S: Development of an expressed gene catalogue and molecular markers from the de novo assembly of short sequence reads of the lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) transcriptome. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013, 11: 894-905.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Le Dantec L, Chagné D, Pot D, Cantin O, Garnier-Géré P, Bedon F, Frigerio JM, Chaumeil P, Léger P, García V, Laigret F, De Daruvar A, Plomion C: Automated SNP detection in expressed sequence tags: statistical considerations and application to maritime pine sequences. Plant Mol Biol. 2004, 54 (3): 461-470.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zerbino DR, Birney E: Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 821-829.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E: Oases: Robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094Google Scholar
  59. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W: CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28 (23): 3150-3152.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000, 2000 (25): 25-29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M: KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: W182-W185.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL: Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10: R25-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008, 5 (7): 621-628. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1226PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Anders S, Huber W: Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11 (10): R106-doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Rastogi S, Kumar R, Chanotiya CS, Shanker K, Gupta MM, Nagegowda DA, Shasany AK: 4-coumarate: CoA ligase partitions metabolites for eugenol biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54 (8): 1238-1252.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Rada M, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Guinda Á: Determination of Triterpenic Acids in Human Serum by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography- Triterpenoid Interaction with Serum Protein. J Agri Food Chem. 2011, 59 (6): 2308-2313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Olofsson L, Engström A, Lundgren A, Brodelius PE: Relative expression of genes of terpenoid metabolism in different tissues of Artemisia annua L. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11: 45-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rastogi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement