Global gene expression during stringent response in Corynebacterium glutamicum in presence and absence of the rel gene encoding (p)ppGpp synthase
© Brockmann-Gretza and Kalinowski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 04 July 2006
Accepted: 08 September 2006
Published: 08 September 2006
The stringent response is the initial reaction of microorganisms to nutritional stress. During stringent response the small nucleotides (p)ppGpp act as global regulators and reprogram bacterial transcription. In this work, the genetic network controlled by the stringent response was characterized in the amino acid-producing Corynebacterium glutamicum.
The transcriptome of a C. glutamicum rel gene deletion mutant, unable to synthesize (p)ppGpp and to induce the stringent response, was compared with that of its rel-proficient parent strain by microarray analysis. A total of 357 genes were found to be transcribed differentially in the rel-deficient mutant strain. In a second experiment, the stringent response was induced by addition of DL-serine hydroxamate (SHX) in early exponential growth phase. The time point of the maximal effect on transcription was determined by real-time RT-PCR using the histidine and serine biosynthetic genes. Transcription of all of these genes reached a maximum at 10 minutes after SHX addition. Microarray experiments were performed comparing the transcriptomes of SHX-induced cultures of the rel-proficient strain and the rel mutant. The differentially expressed genes were grouped into three classes. Class A comprises genes which are differentially regulated only in the presence of an intact rel gene. This class includes the non-essential sigma factor gene sigB which was upregulated and a large number of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism which were downregulated. Class B comprises genes which were differentially regulated in response to SHX in both strains, independent of the rel gene. A large number of genes encoding ribosomal proteins fall into this class, all being downregulated. Class C comprises genes which were differentially regulated in response to SHX only in the rel mutant. This class includes genes encoding putative stress proteins and global transcriptional regulators that might be responsible for the complex transcriptional patterns detected in the rel mutant when compared directly with its rel-proficient parent strain.
In C. glutamicum the stringent response enfolds a fast answer to an induced amino acid starvation on the transcriptome level. It also showed some significant differences to the transcriptional reactions occuring in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Notable are the rel-dependent regulation of the nitrogen metabolism genes and the rel-independent regulation of the genes encoding ribosomal proteins.
Bacteria cultured in a nutritionally poor environment use the stringent response  to survive starvation. The main effector molecule produced during the stringent response is the alarmone (p)ppGpp (guanosine-5'-diphosphate-3'-diphosphate and guanosine-5'-triphosphate-3'-diphosphate, respectively), which is synthesized in Escherichia coli by the relA and the spoT gene products. During amino acid starvation the ratio between charged and uncharged tRNAs decreases at the aminoacyl acceptor site (A-site) of the ribosome, which leads to a stop of protein synthesis. Uncharged tRNAs trigger a signal to the ribosome-bound RelA protein, which catalyzes the phosphorylation of GTP with ATP as donor [1, 2]. The alarmone (p)ppGpp then binds to the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase , which leads to an activation or repression of a variety of genes, resulting in a global reprogramming of the cell to adapt to the new situation. The most prominent result is a growth arrest, accompanied by the downregulation of genes that are strongly expressed in fast growing cells e.g. those encoding ribosomal proteins, cell division and DNA replication proteins as well as a reduction of the amount of stable RNA [4, 5].
In our previous studies it was shown that in contrast to E. coli, C. glutamicum possesses a single bifunctional guanosine pentaphosphate synthetase, termed Rel . A rel gene deletion mutant strain C. glutamicum RES167Δrel was created and shown to be unable to synthesize (p)ppGpp after inducing an artificial amino acid starvation by DL-serine hydroxamate (SHX) . SHX is a serine analogue, which competitively binds to the seryl-tRNA synthetase and thus prevents the seryl-tRNA from being charged . This results in the induction of the stringent response by (p)ppGpp, newly synthesized through the action of the Rel protein in the wild-type strain. Furthermore, the rel mutant failed to downregulate ribosomal RNA transcription under stringent conditions and showed a growth requirement for the amino acids histidine and serine . This observation proposes that transcription of at least parts of both biosynthesis pathways are under a positive stringent control. We had further investigated additional ribosomal genes involved into the stringent response, namely rplK, which is required for activating the Rel protein and is thus part of the mechanism to induce the stringent response of C. glutamicum .
In this study we continued our previous work to explore the regulatory network of the stringent response by comparing the C. glutamicum RES167 and C. glutamicum RES167Δrel transcriptomes by using whole-genome microarrays. In a first approach, the transcriptomes were compared between exponentially growing cultures in complex growth medium indicating a complex pattern of differences in gene expression. In a second approach, the stringent response was induced by the addition of SHX. Therefore, an optimal time-point for harvesting total RNA was determined by a time-resolved characterization of the mRNA profiles of histidine and serine biosynthesis genes. Then, the transcriptomes of the rel-proficient and the rel-deficient strain were compared before and after addition of SHX in order to determine those genes whose transcription was directly affected by (p)ppGpp.
Global gene expression in the exponential growth phase is highly different in a C. glutamicum rel-proficient strain and a rel-deficient mutant unable to produce (p)ppGpp
To study the effects of the effector molecule (p)ppGpp on a genome-wide scale the transcriptomes of a rel-proficient and a rel-deficient strain were compared by hybridization analysis using whole-genome DNA microarrays of C. glutamicum . Therefore, both strains were grown in liquid LB complex medium and cell samples were taken at an O.D.600 of 0.2. RNA isolation from C. glutamicum, labeling of probes and DNA microarray hybridization, including statistical analysis, were performed as described recently . The spot intensities were measured and compared between RES167Δrel (intrel) and RES167 as control (intcont). Each experiment was performed four times, using two biological and two technical replicates including a dye-swap. In accordance with the previously determined technical variation of the C. glutamicum DNA microarray employed, only genes with ratios of intrel/intcont greater than 20.6 or less then 2-0.6 were considered as being differentially expressed. For these ratios the significance value was determined as 0.95, meaning a 95% chance that the gene is differentially regulated. In addition, a Students t-test was applied to filter the data set and only data with an error probability of p = 0.05 or better were used.
Since global gene expression patterns were very different in the rel- proficient and the rel-deficient strain, and sigma factors responsible for global gene regulation are also affected, it was difficult to dissect primary effects of the rel mutation from secondary effects caused by differentially expressed regulatory genes. In order to overcome these problems, a second experimental strategy was employed to describe rel-dependent and rel-independent effects on global gene expression in which the stringent response was induced by the chemical DL-serine hydroxamate (SHX). The strategy consisted of two steps. First, the transcriptional effects of SHX addition on gene expression of stringently controlled genes were followed in a time course to determine the time point at which a maximal first order effect is exerted on gene expression. Then, microarray hybridizations were performed comparing the transcriptomes of both strains before and after addition of SHX for the dissection of rel-dependent and rel-independent effects during stringent response.
The mRNA levels of serine and histidine biosynthesis genes in rel-proficient C. glutamicum cultures treated with serine hydroxamate are induced and reach a maximum ten minutes after induction of the stringent response
The results clearly showed an increase of mRNA levels of some of the tested genes already five minutes (t5) after SHX addition, with all being increased and with a maximum of induction after ten minutes (t10). At this time, mRNA levels of the histidine genes are increased twofold to threefold and serine genes were transcribed stronger by factors of 3 to 7.8. In later stages relative mRNA levels slowly decreased until they reached the initial values at around 25 minutes (t25). It is apparent that the histidine genes, which are localized on the chromosome in operon-like structures, are transcribed in similar patterns, supporting the idea that these genes are organized in the three operons hisEG, hisDCB and hisHA-impA-hisFI. The strongest induction was observed at the hisC and hisH genes (Figure 2). Among the serine biosynthesis genes, serA coding for D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, the first enzyme of the serine biosynthesis, was the gene whose mRNA level was induced most strongly.
These elevated mRNA levels after addition of SHX were not detected in the Rel-deficient strain C. glutamicum RES167Δrel (data not shown), supporting the interpretation that this is the cause for its requirement of histidine and serine as culture supplements to achieve normal growth .
Comparison of transcriptional profiles of C. glutamicum rel-proficient and rel-deficient mutant strains before and after induction of the stringent response allowed to identify rel-dependent genes
To determine the genes directly affected by (p)ppGpp in C. glutamicum, exponentially growing cultures of the rel-proficient strain C. glutamicum RES167 and the rel-deficient mutant strain RES167Δrel carrying a deletion in the (p)ppGpp synthase gene were treated with SHX. The comparison of global gene expression patterns in the rel-proficient and the rel-deficient mutant strain at inducing and non-inducing conditions should allow to define the regulatory networks involved in the stringent response. In addition, comparison of the data sets enabled the identification of those genes that are controlled by the action of the Rel protein (Rel-dependent stringent control) and of those which are not dependent on the action of the Rel protein (Rel-independent control).
Two C. glutamicum cultures were grown in liquid LBG medium up to an O.D.600 of 0.2, at which SHX was added to a final concentration of 50 mM. For each strain, untreated samples (t0) and treated samples were taken ten minutes after SHX addition (t10) and the transcriptomes were compared as described above.
In the m/a plot of the rel-deficient strain (Figure 3B) it is shown that the genes with the strongest upregulation are again katA, gnd (6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase) and thiol stress-related genes. Among the latter, the sufD and nifS2 genes are involved in the repair of damaged iron-sulfur clusters in proteins whereas cysK encodes cysteine synthase. The strongest downregulation is observed for genes encoding ribosomal proteins (e.g. rpsE, rplO, rpmD).
The data obtained on the differentially regulated genes were grouped into three classes: class A genes are under Rel-dependent stringent control and were found to be differentially expressed only when the untreated and SHX-treated cultures of the rel-proficient RES167 strain were compared and therefore are regulated by (p)ppGpp. Class B genes are under positive or negative rel-independent control and show a change in expression in RES167 and its rel-deficient derivative RES167Δrel. In class C those genes were placed which showed a change in expression only when comparing the untreated and the SHX-treated rel-deficient mutant strain. By this classification scheme, the total number of 243 genes found to be differentially expressed in one or both experiments were ordered as follows: 42 genes in class A, 49 in class B and 152 genes in class C (Figure 3C). For reasons of clarity only the classes A and B are presented here in the form of tables (Table 1, 2) and, within the tables only genes which are annotated at least in the form of a COG classification (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins, ) are listed. A full list is available as supplementary Table S1 [see Additional file 1].
Class A genes are under (p)ppGpp mediated stringent control as they were found to be regulated SHX-treatment only in the rel-proficient RES167 strain but not in its rel-deficient derivative RES167Δrel
Class A: Genes under Rel-dependent stringent control
Locus tag a
COG class b
Genes under Rel-dependent, negative stringent control
urease (γ subunit)
glutamine 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase large subunit
3,4-dioxygenase beta subunit
30S ribosomal protein S19
betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase oxireductase
50S ribosomal protein L33
ABC-type urea transport system, permease component
ABC-type urea transport system, permease component
respiratory nitrate reductase 2 (γ chain)
nitrate reductase (Δ chain)
sarcosine oxidase, N-terminal fragment
high-affinity ammonia permease
Nitrogen regulatory protein PII
NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase
glutamine synthetase I
Bacterial regulatory proteins, AsnC family
30S ribosomal protein S6
NADH-dependent flavin oxidoreductase
Genes under Rel-dependent, positive stringent control
cell surface polysaccharide biosynthesis protein
Bacterial extracellular solute-binding protein
ABC-type cobalamin/Fe3+-siderophores transport system
ABC-type cobalamin/Fe3+-siderophores transport system
ABC-type cobalamin/Fe3+-siderophores transport system
acyl-CoA thioesterase II
RNA polymerase sigma factor
LexA repressor transcriptional regulator
PTS system, fructose/mannitol-specific enzyme II
cytochrome C, oxidase subunit 3
ATP-dependent Clp protease, proteolytic subunit ClpP1
ATP-dependent Clp protease ATPase subunit
The group of genes the transcription of which is positively affected in a Rel-dependent manner also comprises those encoding proteins involved in redox processes (qcrB-qcrC-qcrA1-ctaE, Figure 4). Other genes are involved in carbon metabolism (ptsF, pyk, ldh) or regulatory processes on protein (ptpA, clpP1, clpC) or mRNA level (lexA, sigB). Especially sigB is interesting since it encodes the alternative sigma factor (σB) in C. glutamicum which is involved in global gene regulation at the transition from exponential growth to the stationary phase and in the general stress response [13, 14].
Class B genes are regulated Rel-independently and show a change in their expression in the rel-proficient strain and the rel-deficient mutant
Class B: Genes under Rel-independent control
Locus tag a
COG class b
Genes under Rel-independent, negative control
30S ribosomal protein S12
30S ribosomal protein S7
30S ribosomal protein S10
50S ribosomal protein L3
50S ribosomal protein L23
50S ribosomal protein L22
50S ribosomal protein L16
30S ribosomal protein S17
50S ribosomal protein L14
50S ribosomal protein L24
50S ribosomal protein L5
30S ribosomal protein S8
50S ribosomal protein L6
50S ribosomal protein L30
50S ribosomal protein L15
translation initiation factor IF-1
30S ribosomal protein S13
DNA-directed RNA polymerase (α subunit)
50S ribosomal protein L17
50S ribosomal protein L13
carbon starvation protein A
50S ribosomal protein L31
respiratory nitrate reductase oxireductase
nitrate reductase 2 (α subunit)
50S ribosomal protein L20
divalent heavy-metal cations transporter
30S ribosomal protein S15
30S ribosomal protein S16
30S ribosomal protein S20
50S ribosomal protein L21
DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase I
50S ribosomal protein L9
single-stranded DNA-binding protein
Genes under Rel-independent, positive control
acetyl/propionyl-CoA carboxylase (β chain)
pyridoxine biosynthesis enzyme
glutamine amidotransferase (involved in pyridoxine biosynthesis)
components of an uncharacterized iron-regulated ABC-type transporter
component of an uncharacterized iron-regulated ABC-type transporter
cytochrome C oxidase chain II
ATP-dependent Clp protease, proteolytic subunit
sulfate adenyltransferase subunit 1
starvation-induced DNA protecting protein
In a Rel-independent way, transcription of genes involved in oxidative stress response (katA encoding catalase, dps encoding a DNA protection protein) was upregulated not only in the rel-proficient, but also in the rel-deficient mutant strain of C. glutamicum (Table 2). Additionally, the transcription of genes from the suf/nif gene cluster (sufB-sufD-nifS2) involved in the repair of Fe-S clusters damaged by oxidation  was induced under these conditions (Figure 5).
Class C genes belong to a variety of functional complexes and show differential regulation only in the rel-deficient mutant
A large number of genes were found to be regulated after treatment with SHX only in the rel-deficient mutant but not in the rel-proficient strain (class C). Within this class additional genes belonging to the translational (COG class J) and transcriptional apparatus (COG class K) were grouped, in total, 18 genes encoding ribosomal proteins, infB encoding translation initiation factor 2 and prfB (peptide chain release factor 2), as well as rpoB (β subunit of RNA polymerase) as well as cg2177-nusA encoding proteins involved in transcription termination. As illustrated in an example (Figure 5) the transcription ratios of several ribosomal genes in the rel-proficient strain experiment are just below the significance value. Taken into account that most of these genes are organized in operons, it can be assumed they rather belong to class B than to class C.
The expression of genes involved in oxidative stress response has been found to be upregulated only in the rel-deficient mutant (sod encoding superoxide dismutase, cg2674 encoding a putative alkyl hydroperoxidase and tpx encoding a thiol peroxidase). Especially thiol oxidation stress is apparent since also the expression of the fpr2-cysI-cysH-cysD gene cluster for assimilatory sulfate reduction  as well as cysK encoding cysteine synthase are enhanced.
It is apparent that a number of transcriptional regulatory genes fall into class C. Among these are cg1792 encoding a WhiA homologue, whiB2 and whiB4, cg0725 encoding a MarR-family regulator, clgR encoding a stress-induced proteolysis regulator , phoU encoding the putative phosphate uptake regulator, and cg3303 encoding a regulator of the PadR family. All these genes were found to be repressed under stringent conditions in the rel mutant. Another group of genes encoding transcriptional regulators is found to be expressed stronger under these conditions, namely cg1631 encoding a MerR family regulator, dtxR and fur, encoding regulators implicated in metal uptake and homeostasis, cg2500 encoding an ArsR-type regulator, cg2614 encoding a TetR-type regulator, and cg3315 encoding a regulator of the MarR family [18, 19]. This is indicative that cellular metabolism is not well balanced in the mutant but on the other hand this deregulation might cause secondary effects on global gene expression patterns not directly associated with the stringent response.
In earlier studies, we demonstrated that (p)ppGpp is the signalling molecule of the stringent response in C. glutamicum . It is synthesized after inhibiting the seryl-tRNA synthetase by addition of DL-serine hydroxamate (SHX) to the growth medium. We also showed that the Rel protein is responsible for (p)ppGpp formation and that its presence is required for the normal function of the serine and histidine biosynthesis pathways .
In this study, we investigated the timing of the stringent response at the histidine and serine biosynthesis genes by real-time RT-PCR and the global effect of the stringent response on gene expression by using comparative DNA microarray hybridizations. In the following, the observations made will be discussed and the findings in C. glutamicum will be compared to the existing knowledge obtained in the model organisms E. coli and B. subtilis. However, these comparisons have inherent problems. The stringent response of E. coli has up to now not been assessed on a global scale in a mutant unable to synthesize (p)ppGpp and therefore no data exist on a probable relA/spoT-independent stringent response in this organism. In B. subtilis such a study has been carried out  although there the stringent response was induced by DL-norvaline in a mutant auxotrophic for the amino acids lysine and tryptophan.
As an initial microarray experiment comparing the transcriptomes of a C. glutamicum rel mutant strain with its rel-proficient parent yielded an extremely complex pattern of gene expression, the effects of the rel gene on stringent control of transcription were assessed by a second approach including the addition of SHX. In order to determine the optimal harvesting point, the genes encoding the enzymes of the histidine and serine biosynthetic pathways were used for establishing a time course of the stringent response on transcription by sensitive real-time RT-PCR. The induction of transcription of these genes by the stringent response was detected already five minutes after addition of SHX to the medium. The maximum induction of expression was measured 10 minutes after SHX addition. The strongest increase in expression was found in the case of the hisC, hisH and serA genes. Later, expression declined and the transcription ratios were back to normal levels after 25 minutes, indicating that the stringent response is completed at that point and the cells can resume normal growth again. In S. typhimurium, it was shown that an increase of the (p)ppGpp level was detectable immediately after SHX addition and reached its maximum after 7 minutes . These results are in accordance with our experiments and show a rapid response of the cell to an artificially induced amino acid starvation. The histidine genes were among the first ones to be found under positive stringent control [1, 22, 23] and the effect of (p)ppGpp on the his operon in E. coli and S. typhimurium has been studied intensively [21, 23] and was later confirmed by microarray experiments . Our results are in accordance with the E. coli data concerning the induction of the histidine biosynthesis genes, but no induction of histidine or serine gene expression was observed in B. subtilis . However, the exact mechanism of induction of his operon expression in E. coli is still unknown. The strong induction of the serine biosynthesis genes in C. glutamicum is unexpected since mainly histidine and arginine biosynthesis genes are reported to be regulated by the stringent response in E. coli and B. subtilis [1, 20, 25].
In order to identify stringently controlled genes as precise as possible, a filtering of the genes appearing differentially regulated in the microarray experiments was performed and three classes were established. The genes of Class A are differentially expressed only in the presence of a functional rel gene, and therefore, in the presence of (p)ppGpp. Dominant in this class are genes involved in nitrogen metabolism. Namely these are amt (encoding ammonia permease; ), codA (creatinine deaminase; ), ureA (urease γ -subunit; [28, 29]), gltB (glutamine 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase large subunit; ), glnA (glutamine synthetase; ), glnK (nitrogen regulatory protein PII; ), urtBC () and gdh (glutamate dehydrogenase; ). In E. coli, an increased transcription of the glnK gene was observed under stringent conditions , probably reflecting the fact that E. coli has nitrogen sensing and signal transduction mechanisms quite different to those of C. glutamicum . In this context it is interesting to note that the genes of nitrogen metabolism detected here were shown to be controlled by the transcriptional regulator AmtR in C. glutamicum [12, 36]. It was demonstrated that the transcription of the genes of the AmtR regulon is upregulated under nitrogen limitation . There are two different possible explanations for the observation that the genes of the AmtR regulon are under Rel-dependent stringent control. The first possibility is that AmtR is directly affected by (p)ppGpp in a sense that it strengthens its repressor function. Second, it might be speculated that especially the promoters of genes of the AmtR regulon are sensitive to (p)ppGpp.
Also the expression of the alternative sigma factor σB, the supposed functional analogue of the E. coli σS , is induced after invoking the stringent response by an artificial amino acid starvation. In E. coli, σS controls the general stress response and the entry into the stationary phase of growth [38, 39] and thus plays an important role in adaptation to nutritional and environmental stresses. In E. coli, σS expression is increased during the stringent response [24, 39] but contrary to this the B. subtilis functional analogue σB seems to be involved only in general stress response and is not induced by the stringent response [20, 40–42]. This leads to the assumption that a mechanism similar to E. coli is present in C. glutamicum, inducing the stress response as well as the entry into the stationary phase due to nutrient limitation. Here, an inherent problem of such analyses becomes obvious, namely how to distingush between a direct, Rel-dependent induction or repression of gene transcription and σ factor-mediated transcriptional changes. We tried to minimize this problem by analysing a relatively early time-point after induction as it was done for E. coli .
Another important cellular function is provided by the genes coding for subunits of the Clp protease (clpP1, clpC) that are under Rel-dependent, positive stringent control. This shows a strong parallel to results obtained in Streptococcus pyogenes, where the transcription of these genes was found to be upregulated in a Rel-independent manner upon an artificially induced amino acid starvation . As published recently, the clpP1P2 and clpC genes of C. glutamicum are induced upon heat stress . Proteases together with chaperones are the cells quality management system and involved in the regulation of transcriptional regulator genes . It has been shown for E. coli that some proteins are rapidly degraded in an ATP-dependent manner during the stationary phase . Also by means of the ClpP protease, E. coli adapts to the stationary phase on the proteomic level . Thus it might be speculated that by inducing these genes during the stringent response a global change in gene expression is mediated by the changed availability of several regulatory proteins due to proteolysis.
It has to be noted that in the microarray analysis, the histidine and serine biosynthesis genes, which were found to be transcribed stronger in response to the induction of the stringent response in the rel-proficient strain, did not show up with ratios indicating 95% chance of differential regulation. This is explained by the much higher sensitivity of the RT-PCR approach which in turn means that a number of other genes whose transcription is influenced might have escaped this analysis and the stringent data filtering.
The most important complex of class B being upregulated Rel-independently is made of genes involved into the oxidative stress response. Namely these are the genes coding for catalase (katA) and the DNA protection during starvation protein (dps). These findings are in accordance with recent findings in E. coli. Dukan and Nyström  found that at the onset of the stationary phase several genes involved in a response to oxidative stress are induced. In this context the regulation of the dps gene is also of importance. It was shown recently that Dps proteins protect stationary phase cells against a variety of stresses, including oxidative stress  and it was also found to be upregulated during the stringent response in E. coli .
The most prominent members of genes with reduced expression are those for ribosomal proteins which form the dominant complex in this group. In E. coli and B. subtilis, the genes for ribosomal proteins showed a reduced expression after inducing the stringent response [20, 24]. In contrast to B. subtilis [20, 49] the ribosomal genes are Rel-independently controlled in C. glutamicum. This is an apparent discrepancy to the established model which interprets this decrease in expression by the reduced amount of ribosomal RNA available under stringent conditions and the subsequent transcriptional repression on ribosomal protein operons by ribosomal proteins. Since in C. glutamicum, repression of many genes encoding ribosomal proteins is found in both the rel-proficient and the rel-deficient strain after addition of SHX, it might be explained by empty tRNAs which cause a stall in protein biosynthesis by the ribosomes leading to the disassembly of ribosomes. This in turn would cause a negative autoregulation of ribosomal protein gene expression.
Class C, comprising genes that are differentially regulated only in the rel-deficient mutant include a number of genes encoding transcriptional regulators. This can be interpreted as an expression of the fact that the cellular metabolism in the Δrel mutant is much more unbalanced. It seems to be clear that the existence of the latter two classes of genes implies not a certain mechanism for stringent control only active when the Rel protein is inactive or absent. In contrast, it seems to be the expression of an imbalanced metabolism trying to antagonize the effects of an artificial amino acid deficiency without its master regulator (p)ppGpp.
In the longer run this might lead to the complex pattern of differential gene expression observed when comparing the transcriptomes of the rel mutant directly with that of its rel-proficient parent strain.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
In this work, C. glutamicum RES167, a restriction and modification-deficient derivative of the wild-type strain ATCC 13032  and C. glutamicum RES167Δrel  were used. The strains were cultivated at 30°C in Luria-Bertani medium  supplemented with 2 gl-1 glucose (LBG). For transcriptome analysis the cultures were grown to an O.D.600 of 0.2 and then harvested. In the induction experiments, the cultures were divided into two aliquots, one of which was treated with DL-serine hydroxamate (final concentration 50 mM) to induce the stringent response.
Total RNA isolation from C. glutamicum
Approximately 1 × 109 cells were harvested from C. glutamicum cultures and immediately frozen in a dry ice/ethanol bath. The cells were thawed and centrifuged at 6.000 g for 60 seconds. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was resuspended in 800 μl RLT-buffer (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen) and disrupted by means of a Rybolyser Instrument (Hybaid, Heidelberg, Germany). The following clean-up of RNA along with DNase I digestion was performed as described .
cDNA synthesis, DNA microarray experiments and data analysis
The labeled cDNA was synthezised according to , as were the DNA microarray experiments and data analysis. The ImaGene 5.0 Software (BioDiscovery, Los Angeles, CA) was used for spot finding, signal-background segmentation and intensity quantification. Normalization and t-test statistics were carried out with the EMMA microarray data analysis software . According to the validation experiments  all genes with detected gene expression ratios greater than 20.6 or smaller than 2-0.6 were regarded as differentially expressed with a confidence level of at least 95%. The additional Students t-test statistics were performed with a probability cutoff of p = 0.05.
Real-time RT-PCR assays
One-step real-time RT-PCR reactions were performed by using the LightCycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics) and the QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To verify the purity of the obtained PCR products, melting curve analyses were performed. Differences in gene expression were calculated by comparing the crossing points of the samples with the help of the LightCycler software (version 3; Roche Diagnostics).
The authors thank Andrea Hüser for help with microarray analysis. Alfred Pühler, Chair of Genetics, Bielefeld University is acknowledged for helpful discussions. This work was funded in part by the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Comission (QLK3-CT-2000-00497) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031U213D).
- Cashel M, Gentry DR, Hernandez VJ, Villa D: The stringent response. Edited by: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECCK. 1996, 1458-1496.Google Scholar
- Chatterji D, Ojha AK: Revisiting the stringent response, ppGpp and starvation signaling. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001, 4: 160-165. 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00182-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barker MM, Gaal T, Josaitis CA, Gourse RL: Mechanisms of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro. J Mol Biol. 2001, 305: 673-688. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4327.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strauch E, Takano E, Baylis HA, Bibb MJ: The stringent response in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol Microbiol. 1991, 5: 289-298.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tauch A, Wehmeier L, Götker S, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: Relaxed rrn expression and amino acid requirement of a Corynebacterium glutamicum rel mutant defective in (p)ppGpp metabolism. FEMS Microbiol Letters. 2001, 201: 53-58. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10732.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wehmeier L, Schäfer A, Burkovski A, Krämer R, Mechold U, Malke H, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: The role of the Corynebacterium glutamicum rel gene in (p)ppGpp metabolism. Microbiology. 1998, 144: 1853-1862.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blumenthal RM, Lemaux PG, Neidhardt FC, Dennis PP: The effects of the relA gene on the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other transcription and translation proteins in Escherichia coli A. Mol Gen Genet. 1976, 149: 291-296. 10.1007/BF00268530.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wehmeier L, Brockmann-Gretza O, Pisabarro A, Tauch A, Pühler A, Martin JF, Kalinowski J: A Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 mutant with a defined deletion within the rplK gene is impaired in (p)ppGpp accumulation upon amino acid starvation. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 691-700.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hüser AT, Becker A, Brune I, Dondrup M, Kalinowski J, Plassmeier J, Pühler A, Wiegräbe I, Tauch A: Development of a Corynebacterium glutamicum DNA microarray and validation by genome-wide expression profiling during growth with propionate as carbon source. J Biotechnol. 2003, 106: 269-286. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.08.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hartmann M, Barsch A, Niehaus K, Pühler A, Tauch A, Kalinowski A: The glycosylated cell surface protein Rpf2, containing a resuscitation-promoting factor motif, is involved in intercellular communication of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Arch Microbiol. 2004, 182: 299-312. 10.1007/s00203-004-0713-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Vasudevan AV, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 41-10.1186/1471-2105-4-41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jakoby M, Nolden L, Meier-Wagner J, Krämer R, Burkovski A: AmtR, a global repressor in the nitrogen regulation system of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Mol Microbiol. 2000, 37: 964-977. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02073.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oguiza JA, Marcos AT, Martin JF: Transcriptional analysisof the sigA and sigB genes of Brevibacterium lactofermentum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997, 153: 111-117. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10471.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halgasova N, Bukovska G, Ugorcakova J, Timko J, Kormanec J: The Brevibacterium flavum sigma factor SigB has a role in the environmental stress response. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002, 216: 77-84. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11418.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellis KES, Clough B: Nifs and Sufs in malaria. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 41: 973-981. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02588.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rückert C, Koch DJ, Rey DA, Albersmeier A, Mormann S, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: Functional genomics and expression analysis ofthe Corynebacterium glutamicum fpr2-cysIXHDNYZ gene cluster involved in assimilatory sulphate reduction. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 121-10.1186/1471-2164-6-121.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engels S, Schweitzer JE, Ludwig C, Bott M, Schaffer S: clpC and clpP1P2 gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum is controlled by a regulatory network involving the transcriptional regulators ClgR and HspR as well as the ECF sigma factor sigmaH. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 52: 285-302. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03979.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brune I, Brinkrolf K, Kalinowski J, Pühler A, Tauch A: The individual and common repertoire of DNA-binding transcriptional regulators of Corynebacterium glutamicum, Corynebacteriumefficiens, Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium jeikeium deduced from the complete genome sequences. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 86-96. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-86.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brune I, Werner H, Hüser AT, Kalinowski J, Pühler A, Tauch A: The DtxR protein acting as dual transcriptional regulator directs a global regulatory network involved in iron metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 21-10.1186/1471-2164-7-21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eymann C, Homuth G, Scharf C, Hecker M: Bacillus subtilis functional genomics: global characterization of the stringent response by proteome and transcriptome analysis. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 2500-2520. 10.1128/JB.184.9.2500-2520.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shand RF, Blum PH, Mueller RD, Riggs DL, Artz SW: Correlation between histidine operon expression and guanosine 5'-diphosphate-3'-diphosphate levels during amino acid downshift in stringent and relaxed strains of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 737-742.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stephens JC, Artz SW, Ames BN: Guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp): positive effector for histidine operon transcription and general signal for amino-acid deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975, 72: 4389-4393. 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4389.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riggs DL, Mueller RD, Kwan HS, Artz SW: Promoter domain mediates guanosine tetraphosphate activation of the histidine operon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83: 9333-9337. 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9333.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang DE, Smalley DJ, Conway T: Gene expression profilingof Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 45: 289-306. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03001.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams MG, Rogers P: Expression of arg genesin Escherichia coli during arginine limitation dependent upon stringent control of translation. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 1644-1650.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Siewe RM, Weil B, Burkovski A, Eikmanns BJ, Eikmanns M, Krämer R: Functional and genetic characterization of the (methyl)ammonium uptake carrier of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 5398-5403. 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5398.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beckers G, Nolden L, Burkovski A: Glutamate synthase of Corynebacterium glutamicum is not essential for glutamate synthesis and is regulated by the nitrogen status. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 2961-2970.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bendt AK, Beckers G, Silberbach M, Wittmann A, Burkovski A: Utilization of creatinine as an alternative nitrogen source in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Arch Microbiol. 2004, 181: 443-450. 10.1007/s00203-004-0679-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nolden L, Beckers G, Möckel B, Pfefferle W, Nampoothiri KM, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Urease of Corynebacterium glutamicum : organisation of corresponding genes and investigation of activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 189: 305-310. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09248.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nolden L, Farwick M, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Glutamine synthetases in Corynebacterium glutamicum : transcriptional control and regulation of activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 201: 91-98. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10738.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jakoby M, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Nitrogen regulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum : Isolation of genes involved and biochemical characterization of corresponding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999, 173: 303-310. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13518.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beckers G, Bendt AK, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Molecular identification of the urea uptake system and transcriptional analysis of urea transporter- and urease-encoding genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 645-652. 10.1128/JB.186.22.7645-7652.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pukás LG, Inui M, Yukawa H: Structure of the urease operon of Corynebacterium glutamicum. DNA Seq. 2000, 11: 383-394.Google Scholar
- Börmann ER, Eikmanns BJ, Sahm H: Molecular analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum gdh gene encoding glutamate dehydrogenase. Mol Microbiol. 1992, 6: 317-326.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burkovski A: Ammonium assimilation and nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its relatives: an example for new regulatory mechanisms in actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003, 27: 617-628. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00067-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beckers G, Strösser J, Hildebrandt U, Kalinowski J, Farwik M, Krämer R, Burkovski A: Regulation of AmtR-controlled gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum : mechanism and characterization of the AmtR regulon. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 58: 580-595. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04855.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silberbach M, Hüser A, Kalinowski J, Pühler A, Walter B, Krämer R, Burkovski A: DNA microarray analysis of the nitrogen starvation response of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2005, 199: 357-367. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.04.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentry DR, Hernandez VJ, Nguyen LH, Jensen DB, Cashel M: Synthesis of the stationary-phase sigma factor σ S is positively regulated by ppGpp. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 7982-7989.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hengge-Aronis R: Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999, 2: 148-152. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80026-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Völker U, Völker A, Maul B, Hecker M, Dufuor A, Haldenwang WG: Seperate mechanisms activate SigB of Bacillus subtilis in response to environmental and nutritional stresses. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 3771-3780.Google Scholar
- Zhang S, Haldenwang WG: RelA is a component of the nutritional stress activation pathway of the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigma B. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 5714-5721. 10.1128/JB.185.19.5714-5721.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mostertz J, Scharf C, Hecker M, Homuth G: Transcriptome and proteome analysis of Bacillus subtilis gene expression in response to superoxide and peroxide stress. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 497-512. 10.1099/mic.0.26665-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steiner K, Malke H: relA -independent amino acid starvation response network of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 7354-7364. 10.1128/JB.183.24.7354-7364.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gottesmann S: Regulation by proteolysis: developmental switches. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999, 2: 142-147. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80025-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maurizi MR, Rasulova F: Degradation of L-glutamatedehydrogenase from Escherichia coli : allosteric regulation of enzyme stability. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002, 397: 206-216. 10.1006/abbi.2001.2703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weichart D, Querfurth N, Dreger M, Hengge-Aronis R: Global role for ClpP-containing proteases in stationary-phase adaptation of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2003, 49: 1605-1614.Google Scholar
- Dukan S, Nystrom T: Oxidative stress defense and deterioration of growth-arrested Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 26027-26032. 10.1074/jbc.274.37.26027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nair S, Finkel SE: Dps protects cells against multiple stresses during stationary phase. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 4192-4198. 10.1128/JB.186.13.4192-4198.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith I, Paress P, Cabane K, Dubnau E: Genetics and physiology of the rel system of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet. 1980, 178: 271-279. 10.1007/BF00270472.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, Dusch N, Eggeling L, Eikmanns BJ, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Hartmann M, Huthmacher K, Krämer R, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Möckel B, Pfefferle W, Pühler A, Rey D, Rückert C, Sahm H, Wendisch VF, Wiegräbe I, Tauch A: The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate derived amino acids and vitamins. J Biotechnol. 2003, 104: 5-25. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00154-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tauch A, Kirchner O, Löffler B, Götker S, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: Efficient electrotransformation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae with a mini-replicon derived from the Corynebacterium glutamicum plasmid pGA1. Curr Microbiol. 2002, 45: 362-267. 10.1007/s00284-002-3728-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbour, USA, 2Google Scholar
- Dondrup M, Goesmann A, Bartels D, Kalinowski J, Krause L, Linke B, Rupp O, Scyrba A, Pühler A, Meyer F: EMMA: a platform for consistent storage and efficient analysis of microarray data. J Biotechnol. 2003, 106: 135-146. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.08.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.