Open Access

Identification and characterisation of the angiotensin converting enzyme-3 (ACE3) gene: a novel mammalian homologue of ACE

  • Monika Rella1,
  • Joann L Elliot1, 2,
  • Timothy J Revett1, 2,
  • Jerry Lanfear3,
  • Anne Phelan3,
  • Richard M Jackson1,
  • Anthony J Turner1 and
  • Nigel M Hooper1, 2Email author
BMC Genomics20078:194

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-194

Received: 19 March 2007

Accepted: 27 June 2007

Published: 27 June 2007



Mammalian angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) plays a key role in blood pressure regulation. Although multiple ACE-like proteins exist in non-mammalian organisms, to date only one other ACE homologue, ACE2, has been identified in mammals.


Here we report the identification and characterisation of the gene encoding a third homologue of ACE, termed ACE3, in several mammalian genomes. The ACE3 gene is located on the same chromosome downstream of the ACE gene. Multiple sequence alignment and molecular modelling have been employed to characterise the predicted ACE3 protein. In mouse, rat, cow and dog, the predicted protein has mutations in some of the critical residues involved in catalysis, including the catalytic Glu in the HEXXH zinc binding motif which is Gln, and ESTs or reverse-transcription PCR indicate that the gene is expressed. In humans, the predicted ACE3 protein has an intact HEXXH motif, but there are other deletions and insertions in the gene and no ESTs have been identified.


In the genomes of several mammalian species there is a gene that encodes a novel, single domain ACE-like protein, ACE3. In mouse, rat, cow and dog ACE3, the catalytic Glu is replaced by Gln in the putative zinc binding motif, indicating that in these species ACE3 would lack catalytic activity as a zinc metalloprotease. In humans, no evidence was found that the ACE3 gene is expressed and the presence of deletions and insertions in the sequence indicate that ACE3 is a pseudogene.


Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE; EC is a well-characterised zinc metallopeptidase that plays a key role in the renin-angiotensin system [1]. Through cleavage of a C-terminal dipeptide from angiotensin I to produce the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II, and through inactivation of the vasodilator bradykinin, ACE regulates blood pressure and cardiovascular homeostasis. Inhibitors of ACE, such as captopril and lisinopril, are front line therapeutics in a range of cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial infarction [2].

ACE exists in two forms as a result of alternative use of promoters within the same gene on human chromosome 17 and mouse chromosome 11: the larger, two domain somatic ACE (1306 amino acids in humans) and the smaller, single domain germinal ACE (701 amino acids in humans) [3]. The latter is identical to the C-terminal domain of somatic ACE, except for a unique region of 67 amino acids at its N-terminus. The two domains of somatic ACE are catalytically active and each contains the prototypical zinc binding motif HEXXH. In this motif, the two His residues are two of the zinc ligands, the third being a Glu on the C-terminal side of this motif [4]. The Glu in the HEXXH motif is critically involved in catalysis, binding the activated water molecule which initiates a nucleophilic attack on the susceptible peptide bond in the substrate. Recently, the separate three-dimensional structures of the C-domain and of the N-domain of ACE in complex with the inhibitor lisinopril have been reported [5, 6]. Somatic and germinal ACE are synthesised with an N-terminal signal sequence that is cleaved off in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and exist as type I integral membrane proteins anchored to the plasma membrane through a hydrophobic transmembrane domain at the C-terminus.

In 2000, we and another group independently reported the identification using genomics-based strategies of the first human homologue of ACE, termed angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) [7, 8]. Like ACE, ACE2 is a type 1 integral membrane protein, however, ACE2 contains only a single active site domain and consists of 805 amino acids. The gene encoding ACE2 is located on the X chromosome. ACE2 acts as a carboxypeptidase removing single amino acids from the C-terminus of its substrates, whereas ACE acts predominantly as a peptidyl dipeptidase removing C-terminal dipeptides [1]. Studies from knockout mice indicate that ACE2 is an essential regulator of heart function [9] and is involved in the tissue response to injury [10]. ACE2 is also the receptor for the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus [11]. Homology modelling of the active site of ACE2 on the crystal structure of the C-domain of ACE [12] and the subsequent elucidation of the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular domain of ACE2 [13] revealed that the catalytic mechanism of ACE2 closely resembles that of ACE. However, the substrate-binding pockets differ significantly explaining the differences in substrate specificity between the two enzymes and the failure of ACE inhibitors to bind to and inhibit ACE2 [7, 14].

ACE-like proteins also occur in non-mammalian species [15, 16]. Drosophila melanogaster has two functionally active, single domain, soluble ACE-like proteins (termed Ance and Acer) that share 36% amino acid sequence identity with human ACE [17]. There are four other ACE-like genes in D. melanogaster that encode proteins which are predicted to be catalytically inactive as they lack critical residues involved in zinc binding or catalysis [18]. In the mosquito Anopheles gambiae there are 9 genes which code for proteins with similarity to mammalian ACE [19], while in Caenorhabditis elegans there is a single ACE-like gene which also encodes a protein that is predicted to be catalytically inactive [20]. Orthologues of ACE2 have been described recently in a range of non-mammalian vertebrates [21].

In this study we have identified and characterised a gene in the genomes of several mammalian species that encodes a novel, single domain ACE-like protein, that we have termed ACE3. In mouse, rat, cow and dog ACE3, the catalytic Glu is replaced by Gln (HQXXH) in the putative zinc binding motif, indicating that in these species ACE3 would lack catalytic activity as a zinc metalloprotease. In humans, we could find no evidence that the ACE3 gene is expressed and the presence of deletions and insertions in the sequence indicate that in humans ACE3 is a pseudogene.


Predicted ACE3 sequences in mouse, rat, dog and cow genomes

Blast searches using human somatic ACE against the mouse genome and gene prediction programmes on the NCBI and Ensembl databases identified a potential homologous region on chromosome 11 (region E1) downstream of the ACE gene.

The murine ACE3 gene consists of 2253 nucleotides which encodes a predicted protein of 750 amino acids (Fig. 1). Hydropathy analysis and transmembrane prediction revealed two hydrophobic regions at the C-terminus of the protein but no N-terminal signal peptide. The predicted amino acid sequence of murine ACE3 exhibits significant homology to existing members of the ACE family (Table 1), with the highest percentage identity (57%) to the C-terminal domain of murine somatic ACE. In murine ACE3, the HEMGH zinc binding motif characteristic of other members of the ACE family was HQMGH (Fig. 1). Predicted ACE3 sequences were identified also in the rat, dog and cow genomes (Fig. 1). These sequences are more closely related amongst each other than to ACE sharing 81%, 65% and 58% sequence identity with murine ACE3 in the case of rat, cow and dog, respectively. They all contain the HQMGH motif characteristic of mouse ACE3, however, neither the cow nor dog ACE3 predicted sequences contain an N-terminal signal peptide, although the rat ACE3 predicted sequence does. Both the rat and cow ACE3 sequences contain a predicted C-terminal transmembrane region, whereas the dog ACE3 lacks such a region.
Figure 1

Multiple sequence alignment of predicted ACE3 sequences from human, mouse, rat, cow and dog with human testicular ACE. HEXXH motif indicated. Underlined are the predicted N-terminal signal sequences (human and rat ACE3) and C-terminal transmembrane regions (human, rat, mouse and cow ACE3), along with the known N-terminal signal sequence and C-terminal transmembrane region in testicular ACE. The human ACE3 sequence was restored by compensating for fbase deletion(s)/insertions and suppressing *stop codons. Positions of the forward and reverse RT-PCR primers are indicated by the arrows beneath the sequence. Accession numbers: Mouse XP_110936; Rat XP_573208; Dog XP_548034; Cow XP_600103.

Table 1

Percentage identity of the murine ACE family.























The catalytic peptidase M2 domains [44] of murine ACE (N- and C-domain), ACE2 and ACE3 were aligned with each other using needle [37] and the percentage identity deduced.

Genomic sequence analysis of the murine ACE3 gene

The predicted murine ACE3 protein sequence was mapped onto the genomic DNA and the intron-exon boundaries determined. The murine ACE3 gene contains 13 exons, interspersed with 12 introns, spans 10.7 kb and is located 5.5 kb downstream of the ACE gene (Fig. 2). In the ACE3 gene, all the intron-exon junction sequences follow the GT/GA rule (Table 2). Exon 8 contains the HQMGH motif. The predicted ACE3 genes in rat, dog and cow are also located on the same chromosome as ACE, always downstream and in close proximity. A TblastN search of ACE3 against the annotated mouse genome at the NCBI only detected significant homology with ACE (e-value: 6 × 10-79) and ACE2 (e-value: 6 × 10-10). No other hit exists with an e-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that there is no further closely related homologue of ACE3, other than ACE and ACE2, in the mouse genome.
Figure 2

Genomic mapping of mouse ACE3 to chromosome 11 region E1. The exons encoding mouse ACE3 were mapped to the genomic sequence based on NCBI predictions for that gene.

Table 2

Exon/intron boundary prediction for mouse ACE3.

Exon no.

Exon size (bp)

cDNA position

5' Splice donor

Intron size (bp)

3' Splice acceptor

Codon phase

























































































Lower case letters denote exon sequences; intron sequences are in upper case letters. The codon phase indicates the position of the intron in the codon triplet. O intron occurs between codons, I intron occurs after the first nucleotide, and II intron occurs after the second nucleotide in the codon.

Expression of ACE3 in murine tissues

The expression of the mRNA encoding ACE3 was examined in several murine tissues. RT-PCR using selective primers was performed on a panel of total RNA samples from different tissues (Fig. 3). A transcript encoding ACE3 was detected in testis, heart and embryo, but not in a range of other tissues, including, kidney, lung, and liver. Although a larger RT-PCR product was identified in the brain RNA sample, on sequencing this was found not to correspond to ACE3.
Figure 3

RT-PCR analysis of ACE3 mRNA expression in various murine tissues. Total RNA (1 μg) from the indicated tissues was subjected to one step RT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods followed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. (A) mouse ACE3; (B) actin. Lanes are as follows: 1, positive control (whole mouse RNA with primers for actin); 2, negative control (no RNA); 3, brain; 4, embryo; 5, heart; 6, kidney; 7, liver; 8, lung; 9, ovary; 10, spleen; 11, testis; 12, thymus.

Modelling of the substrate binding site of murine ACE3

The predicted murine ACE3 sequence was modelled on the C-terminal domain of human somatic ACE [5]. Overall, both the fold and active site in murine ACE3 are highly conserved as compared to human ACE (Fig. 4). However, several substitutions occur in the ACE3 predicted active site, some of which are unique to ACE3 family members (such as Glu384 to Gln and Asp415 to Ser) (Fig. 5). The most significant substitution is unquestionably Glu384 to Gln that replaces the catalytic Glu in the HEXXH zinc binding motif. Comparison of residues surrounding the proposed transition state of ACE [22, 23] show why this substitution could be so detrimental to the ability of ACE3 to act as a protease (Fig. 5). Ionized Glu384 is proposed to stabilise the positively charged amine intermediate and act as a proton acceptor/donor in the ACE enzyme mechanism. In addition to the Gln being a poor proton acceptor/donor in ACE3, its involvement is further compromised by both the amide side chain atoms being involved in hydrogen bonding to two neighbouring residues, substituted from Ala to Thr361 and Ser363, respectively. Another important substitution is Asp415 to Ser which affects zinc binding by interfering with the hydrogen bond network to His383, the first histidine residue in the HEXXH zinc binding motif in testicular ACE.
Figure 4

Model of murine ACE3. The murine ACE3 model (blue) is superimposed on the human testicular ACE structure (green) co-crystallised with lisinopril (yellow). The zinc ion (spacefill) is coordinated by the zinc binding residues (red). The chloride ions (Cl) of testicular ACE and the locations of the N- and C- termini are also shown. A loop missing in testicular ACE is modelled in red.
Figure 5

Proposed catalytic mechanism in ACE (top) in contrast to predicted interactions in ACE3 (bottom). Four amino acid substitutions (in boxes) are rationalised to cause loss of activity in murine ACE3 (see text). Note: Gln391 can be flipped and interact either way with the hydroxyl groups of Thr361 and Ser363 as the hydroxyl group can act either as a hydrogen bond donor or as an acceptor.

Genomic sequence analysis of the human ACE3 gene

Blast searches using human somatic ACE against the human genome and gene prediction programmes on the Ensembl and NCBI databases identified a potential homologous region on chromosome 17 (region q23), 30 kb downstream of the start site of the ACE gene. This third potential human homologue of ACE was termed human ACE3. According to current annotation for the ACE gene (NCBI), a third ACE transcript exists. Alternative splicing at the 3' coding region results in a frameshift and a C-terminus that differs from the testicular ACE transcript in the last three exons. Interestingly, this transcript variant comprises another 15 exons in the 3' non-coding region, closely corresponding to the location of ACE3 (Fig. 6), suggesting that the ancestral ACE3 may be a pseudogene contained within the ACE gene.
Figure 6

Gene structure of the human ACE3 gene. The restored ancestral ACE3 is compared to three known ACE transcripts (somatic ACE (sACE), testicular ACE (tACE) and ACE isoform 3). ACE3 can be partly reconstructed from the ACE isoform 3 transcript. For clarity, only relevant exons are shown. Exons (black), introns (grey). Exons numbered according to NCBI gene annotation (ACE) and by comparison to other ACE3 sequences (ACE3). Individual ACE3 exons are identical to isoform 3 except for exons 2 and 11 (both have extra base pairs). Exons 28, 31 and 35 are not part of ACE3 (non-ACE like exons). Exons 1, 4 and part of exon 2 are spliced out in the isoform 3 transcript. * indicates stop codons; ** restored ACE3 stop codon (adapted from NCBI GeneID:1636).

The restored human ACE3 protein sequence (adjusted for several base deletions/insertions causing frame shifts and premature stop codons, see Fig. 1) shows strong conservation with ACE and other ACE3 sequences. It contains the typical HEMGH zinc binding motif present in other members of the ACE family and is 54% identical to the C-domain of human ACE and 71% identical to the mouse ACE3 catalytic domain, respectively. The ancestral ACE3 gene is predicted to contain at least 14 exons, interspersed with 13 introns and spans 13 kb (Fig. 6). All of the predicted intron-exon junction sequences follow the GT/GA rule (data not shown). Hydropathy analysis and transmembrane prediction revealed two hydrophobic regions at the C-terminus, in agreement with ACE3 from other species, and an N-terminal signal peptide.

The human ACE3 gene sequence, however, has several frame shifts and premature stop codons (see Fig. 1). For example, there is a one base deletion directly after the sequence encoding the HEMGH zinc binding motif that causes a frameshift and a premature stop codon. To confirm this deletion, genomic DNA was isolated from 3 different human cell lines (Eahy926, Hek293, SH-SY5Y) and PCR performed using primers flanking this region. In all three cell lines sequencing of the PCR product confirmed that there was a one base deletion directly after the codon for the second His of the zinc binding motif (data not shown).

RT-PCR was used in an attempt to identify potential mRNA transcripts of human ACE3. However, RT-PCR using various primer sets on an RNA panel that included total RNA from human brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, testis, colon, small intestine, placenta and skeletal muscle failed to identify a transcript. The specificity of the primers was checked by using them to PCR genomic DNA extracted from Hek293 cells from which they amplified a band of the predicted size that corresponded to the sequence of ACE3 (data not shown). To date, blast searches of the EST databases has not identified any ESTs for human ACE3. Thus, point mutations that give rise to premature stop codons and the failure to identify RNA transcripts or ESTs all suggest that human ACE3 is likely a pseudogene.


In this study we have identified and characterised the gene encoding a third mammalian homologue of ACE, termed ACE3. The properties of the predicted ACE3 protein sequences in human, mouse, rat, dog and cow are summarised in Table 3. ACE3 in the mouse, rat, cow and dog all contain Gln rather than Glu within the HQMGH motif. The Glu residue is 100% conserved in all other ACE (M2) family members and the MA (HEXXH containing) clan of metalloproteases and is critically involved in catalysis [24]. When this Glu was mutated to Gln in either endopeptidase-24.15 [25] or ACE (Elliot, Duff, Jackson & Hooper, unpublished) enzyme activity was completely abolished. Another important substitution in murine ACE3 is Asp415 to Ser which affects zinc binding by interfering with the hydrogen bond network to the first histidine residue in the HEXXH zinc binding motif. This residue is conserved among vertebrate ACEs and in other metalloproteases, corresponding to Asp650 in neprilysin (M13 family) and Asp170 in thermolysin (M4 family). In both ACE and neprilysin, this Asp was shown to be critical for catalytic activity [26, 27]. Due to these critical residues being mutated in ACE3, it is likely that in mouse, rat, cow and dog ACE3 will not be functional as a protease. Although the ACE3 sequences in mouse, rat and cow all possess C-terminal hydrophobic regions, only the rat ACE3 sequence is predicted to contain an N-terminal signal peptide which would direct the nascent protein into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and then potentially to the cell surface as is the case for ACE and ACE2. ESTs for mouse, rat and cow ACE3 have been identified in the databases and RT-PCR of multiple tissues revealed a transcript for ACE3 in mouse heart and testis. In addition, a recent proteomic analysis of murine sperm regions that mediate sperm-egg interactions, reported the identification of a protein with the same gene locus (LOC217246) as ACE3 [28]. Thus, the available data suggest that ACE3 in mouse, rat and cow is expressed, but lacks protease activity.
Table 3

Comparison of the ACE3 sequences.


Length (amino acids)

Zinc-binding motif

Signal peptide

TM region























§refers to restored ancestral sequence as shown in Fig. 1.

Within another zinc metalloprotease family, the ADAM (a d isintegrin a nd m etalloprotease) family, several members have subtle or more complete mutation of the HEXXH motif [29]. For example, in ADAM4 the Glu is mutated to Ala, while in ADAM29 it is His. Interestingly many of these catalytically inactive members of the ADAM family are present exclusively in the testis, where some have critical roles in fertilisation [29]. It remains to be determined whether ACE3 has a role to play in fertilisation, although the recent report of its presence in membrane vesicles released by the acrosome reaction [28] is suggestive of such a role. There is a further parallel between the ADAM family members and ACE3, in that a large number of the ADAMs present in the mouse genome are pseudogenes in humans [29]. In the present study we could find no evidence for human ACE3 to be expressed and the presence in the gene of multiple base insertions and deletions would, if expressed, generate a severely truncated protein lacking residues that are critical for zinc binding and/or catalysis in ACE and ACE2 [5, 12, 13]. This, and the localisation of ACE3 within the ACE gene, point to ACE3 being a pseudogene in humans.

Traditional, non-processed or duplicated pseudogenes characteristically contain introns as they are duplications of the genomic DNA, whereas processed or retrotransposed pseudogenes are duplicated from RNA and lack introns [30]. In addition, non-processed pseudogenes are usually adjacent to their original functional copies. As human ACE3 contains introns and is localised to the same region of the genome as ACE, it appears to be a non-processed pseudogene. Such non-processed pseudogenes are often silenced by point mutations, insertions or deletions, as seen in human ACE3. This 'pseudogenization' of genes in humans, as seen here with ACE3, results in the human degradome containing only 561 functional genes, while the mouse degradome is larger with 641 genes [31]. Interestingly, many of these additional mouse genes are involved in fertilisation and immunity.

While the ACE3 gene being located on the same chromosome just downstream of the ACE gene in all five genomes analysed may just reflect an evolutionary relationship, it is possible that this location alongside the ACE gene may reflect a potential functional role at the genomic level, as pseudogenes can regulate the expression of a related gene. For example, the makorin1 protein is evolutionarily conserved from nematodes to mammals and encodes an RNA binding protein [32]. Normally makorin1 is expressed throughout the animal but the disruption of the makorin1 pseudogene markedly reduced the expression of the makorin1 gene. This implies that for normal expression of makorin1, the presence of the RNA for the makorin1 pseudogene is required. However, it should be noted that a subsequent report failed to replicate this finding [33] and the technical problems associated with such studies are discussed more fully in [34]. Thus it is possible, but remains to be determined, that the ACE3 gene may regulate the expression of the ACE gene.


Multiple ACE-like genes have been identified in a range of non-mammalian species and here we report the identification and characterisation of a third ACE-like gene in the genomes of several mammalian species. This gene encodes a novel, single domain ACE-like protein, ACE3. In the mouse, rat, cow and dog, where there is evidence that ACE3 is expressed, the catalytic Glu is replaced by Gln in the putative zinc binding motif, indicating that in these species ACE3 would lack catalytic activity as a zinc metalloprotease. In humans, although the predicted ACE3 protein would contain an intact HEXXH zinc binding motif, no evidence was found for the expression of the gene. This lack of expression, along with the presence of deletions and insertions in the sequence, indicate that in humans ACE3 is a pseudogene.


Bioinformatics Analysis

Blast searches for potential ACE3 sequences using human somatic ACE were performed against the mouse genome and gene prediction programmes on the NCBI [35] and Ensembl [36] databases. According to NCBI annotations, the alternate Celera genome assembly is composed of DNA from five different mouse strains: A/J, DBA/2J, 129X1/SvJ, 129S1/SvImJ and C57BL/6J, whereas the reference assembly is based on C57BL/6J. Sequences used for bioinformatics sequence analysis and homology modelling were obtained from the NCBI RefSeq database. Sequence analysis was performed using the Emboss software suite [37], Clustal W [38] and 3DCoffee [39]. Hydropathy analysis was performed as described [40]. Transmembrane and signal peptide regions were predicted using TMpred [41] and SignalP [42], respectively. Homology modelling of mouse ACE3 was undertaken with the SWISS-MODEL software [43] based on its alignment to the human testicular ACE template (PDB code 1o86).

Reverse transcription-PCR

Human and murine (from Swiss Webster mice) total RNA was from Ambion (Europe) Ltd. (Huntingdon, UK). Genomic DNA was isolated from Eahy926, Hek293 and SH-SY5Y cells using TRIzol (GE Biosciences). Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with a one step Titanium RT-PCR kit (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) with 1 μg of RNA and the appropriate forward and reverse primers at 50 pmol/μl. For mouse ACE3 the primers were: forward 5'-GGGCGGGAAGTGGAGTGCCACA-3'; reverse 5'-GTTGACCTCCTCCTCTGAATCCTGG-3'. For human ACE3 the primers were: forward 5'-TCTGCCTGGAACTTCCCAGGACG-3'; reverse 5'-CCCATTTCGTGGAAAGATGGAGAGCG-3'. For mouse actin the primers were: forward 5'-GTGGGCCGCTCTAGGCACCAA-3'; reverse 5'-CTCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3'. After incubation at 50°C for 1 h and initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min and extension at 68°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 68°C for 2 min was performed.



angiotensin converting enzyme


a disintegrin and metalloprotease


expressed sequence tag


reverse transcription-PCR.



We thank the Medical Research Council of Great Britain and Pfizer (Sandwich, UK) for financial support of this work. The help of Stephen Ballard (Pfizer, UK) in the initial stages of this project is gratefully acknowledged. M. R. thanks the University of Leeds for a Research Scholarship.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds
Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics, University of Leeds
Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich


  1. Turner AJ, Hooper NM: The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene family: genomics and pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002, 23: 177-183.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya KR, Sturrock ED, Riordan JF, Ehlers MR: Ace revisited: A new target for structure-based drug design. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003, 2: 891-902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hubert C, Houot AM, Corvol P, Soubrier F: Structure of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene. Two alternate promoters correspond to evolutionary steps of a duplicated gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991, 266: 15377-15383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hooper NM: Families of zinc metalloproteases. FEBS Letters. 1994, 354: 1-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Natesh R, Schwager SL, Sturrock ED, Acharya KR: Crystal structure of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme-lisinopril complex. Nature. 2003, 421: 551-554.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Corradi HR, Schwager SL, Nchinda AT, Sturrock ED, Acharya KR: Crystal structure of the N domain of human somatic angiotensin I-converting enzyme provides a structural basis for domain-specific inhibitor design. J Mol Biol. 2006, 357: 964-974.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Tipnis SR, Hooper NM, Hyde R, Karran EH, Christie G, Turner AJ: A human homolog of angiotensin converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 33238-33243.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Donoghue M, Hsieh F, Baronas E, Godbout K, Gosselin M, Stagliano N, Donovan M, Woolf B, Robison K, Jeyaseelan R, Breitbart RE, Acton S: A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1-9. Circ Res. 2000, 87: E1-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, Yagil C, Kozieradzki I, Scanga SE, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, da Costa J, Zhang L, Pei Y, Scholey J, Ferrario CM, Manoukian AS, Chappell MC, Backx PH, Yagil Y, Penninger JM: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature. 2002, 417: 822-828.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, Crackower MA, Fukamizu A, Hui CC, Hein L, Uhlig S, Slutsky AS, Jiang C, Penninger JM: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005, 436: 112-116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, Choe H, Farzan M: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003, 426: 450-454.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Guy JL, Jackson RM, Acharya KR, Sturrock ED, Hooper NM, Turner AJ: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2): Comparative Modeling of the Active Site, Specificity Requirements, and Chloride Dependence. Biochemistry. 2003, 42: 13185-13192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Towler P, Staker B, Prasad SG, Menon S, Tang J, Parsons T, Ryan D, Fisher M, Williams D, Dales NA, Patane MA, Pantoliano MW: ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 17996-18007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rice GI, Thomas DA, Grant PJ, Turner AJ, Hooper NM: Evaluation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism. Biochem J. 2004, 383: 45-51.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Isaac RE, Lamango NS, Ekbote U, Taylor CA, Hurst D, Weaver RJ, Carhan A, Burnham S, Shirras AD: Angiotensin-converting enzyme as a target for the development of novel insect growth regulators. Peptides. 2007, 28: 153-162.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Riviere G, Michaud A, Deloffre L, Vandenbulcke F, Levoye A, Breton C, Corvol P, Salzet M, Vieau D: Characterization of the first non-insect invertebrate functional angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE): leech TtACE resembles the N-domain of mammalian ACE. Biochem J. 2004, 382: 565-573.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Houard X, Williams TA, Michaud A, Dani P, Isaac RE, Shirras AD, Coates D, Corvol P: The Drosophila melanogaster-related angiotensin-I-converting enzymes Acer and Ance--distinct enzymic characteristics and alternative expression during pupal development [In Process Citation]. Eur J Biochem. 1998, 257: 599-606.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Coates D, Isaac RE, Cotton J, Siviter R, Williams TA, Shirras A, Corvol P, Dive V: Functional conservation of the active sites of human and Drosophila angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Biochemistry. 2000, 39: 8963-8969.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnham S, Smith JA, Lee AJ, Isaac RE, Shirras AD: The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene family of Anopheles gambiae. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 172-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Brooks DR, Appleford PJ, Murray L, Isaac RE: An essential role in molting and morphogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans for ACN-1, a novel member of the angiotensin-converting enzyme family that lacks a metallopeptidase active site. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 52340-52346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chou CF, Loh CB, Foo YK, Shen S, Fielding BC, Tan TH, Khan S, Wang Y, Lim SG, Hong W, Tan YJ, Fu J: ACE2 orthologues in non-mammalian vertebrates (Danio, Gallus, Fugu, Tetraodon and Xenopus). Gene. 2006, 377: 46-55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez M, Liu X, Wouters MA, Heyberger S, Husain A: Angiotensin I-converting enzyme transition-state stabilization by His1089: evidence for a catalytic mechanism distinct from other gluzincin metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 4998-5004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Guy JL, Jackson RM, Jensen HA, Hooper NM, Turner AJ: Identification of critical active-site residues in angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) by site-directed mutagenesis. Febs J. 2005, 272: 3512-3520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF: Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. 2004, Amsterdam, Elsevier Academic Press, 1: 1047-secondGoogle Scholar
  25. Cummins PM, Pabon A, Margulies EH, Glucksman MJ: Zinc coordination and substrate catalysis within the neuropeptide processing enzyme endopeptidase EC Identification of active site histidine and glutamate residues. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 16003-16009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams TA, Corvol P, Soubrier F: Identification of two active site residues in human angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994, 269: 29430-29434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Moual H, Dion N, Roques BP, Crine P, Boileau G: Asp650 is crucial for catalytic activity of neutral endopeptidase 24.11. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1994, 221: 475-480.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein KK, Go JC, Lane WS, Primakoff P, Myles DG: Proteomic analysis of sperm regions that mediate sperm-egg interactions. Proteomics. 2006, 6: 3533-3543.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Cho C: Mammalian ADAMs with testis-specific or -predominant expression. The ADAM family of proteases. Edited by: Hooper NM and Lendeckel U. 2005, Dordrecht, Springer, 239-259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Z, Gerstein M: Large-scale analysis of pseudogenes in the human genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004, 14: 328-335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Puente XS, Sanchez LM, Overall CM, Lopez-Otin C: Human and mouse proteases: a comparative genomic approach. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4: 544-558.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirotsune S, Yoshida N, Chen A, Garrett L, Sugiyama F, Takahashi S, Yagami K, Wynshaw-Boris A, Yoshiki A: An expressed pseudogene regulates the messenger-RNA stability of its homologous coding gene. Nature. 2003, 423: 91-96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray TA, Wilson A, Fortin PJ, Nicholls RD: The putatively functional Mkrn1-p1 pseudogene is neither expressed nor imprinted, nor does it regulate its source gene in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 12039-12044.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng D, Gerstein MB: The ambiguous boundary between genes and pseudogenes: the dead rise up, or do they?. Trends Genet. 2007Google Scholar
  35. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR: NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D501-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Birney E, Andrews D, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, Coates G, Cox T, Cunningham F, Curwen V, Cutts T, Down T, Durbin R, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flicek P, Graf S, Hammond M, Herrero J, Howe K, Iyer V, Jekosch K, Kahari A, Kasprzyk A, Keefe D, Kokocinski F, Kulesha E, London D, Longden I, Melsopp C, Meidl P, Overduin B, Parker A, Proctor G, Prlic A, Rae M, Rios D, Redmond S, Schuster M, Sealy I, Searle S, Severin J, Slater G, Smedley D, Smith J, Stabenau A, Stalker J, Trevanion S, Ureta-Vidal A, Vogel J, White S, Woodwark C, Hubbard TJ: Ensembl 2006. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D556-61.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16: 276-277.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Sullivan O, Suhre K, Abergel C, Higgins DG, Notredame C: 3DCoffee: combining protein sequences and structures within multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 385-395.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kyte J, Doolittle RF: A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982, 157: 105-132.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hofmann K, Stoffel W: Tmbase - A database of membrane spanning protein segments. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler. 1993, 374: 166-Google Scholar
  42. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 783-795.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC: SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3381-3385.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Corvol P, Williams TA, Soubrier F: Peptidyl dipeptidase A: angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Methods in Enzymology. 1995, 248: 283-305.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Rella et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.