Open Access

The small FNR regulon of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: comparison with the larger Escherichia coli FNR regulon and interaction with the NarQ-NarP regulon

  • Rebekah N Whitehead1,
  • Tim W Overton1,
  • Lori AS Snyder2,
  • Simon J McGowan3,
  • Harry Smith4,
  • Jeff A Cole1Email author and
  • Nigel J Saunders2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Genomics20078:35

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-35

Received: 07 September 2006

Accepted: 29 January 2007

Published: 29 January 2007

Abstract

Background

Neisseria gonorrhoeae can survive during oxygen starvation by reducing nitrite to nitrous oxide catalysed by the nitrite and nitric oxide reductases, AniA and NorB. The oxygen-sensing transcription factor, FNR, is essential for transcription activation at the aniA promoter, and full activation also requires the two-component regulatory system, NarQ-NarP, and the presence of nitrite. The only other gene known to be activated by the gonococcal FNR is ccp encoding a cytochrome c peroxidase, and no FNR-repressed genes have been reported in the gonococcus. In contrast, FNR acts as both an activator and repressor involved in the control of more than 100 operons in E. coli regulating major changes in the adaptation from aerobic to anaerobic conditions. In this study we have performed a microarray-led investigation of the FNR-mediated responses in N. gonorrhoeae to determine the physiological similarities and differences in the role of FNR in cellular regulation in this species.

Results

Microarray experiments show that N. gonorrhoeae FNR controls a much smaller regulon than its E. coli counterpart; it activates transcription of aniA and thirteen other genes, and represses transcription of six genes that include dnrN and norB. Having previously shown that a single amino acid substitution is sufficient to enable the gonococcal FNR to complement an E. coli fnr mutation, we investigated whether the gonococcal NarQ-NarP can substitute for E. coli NarX-NarL or NarQ-NarP. A plasmid expressing gonococcal narQ-narP was unable to complement E. coli narQP or narXL mutants, and was insensitive to nitrate or nitrite. Mutations that progressively changed the periplasmic nitrate sensing region, the P box, of E. coli NarQ to the sequence of the corresponding region of gonococcal NarQ resulted in loss of transcription activation in response to the availability of either nitrate or nitrite. However, the previously reported ligand-insensitive ability of gonococcal NarQ, the "locked on" phenotype, to activate either E. coli NarL or NarP was confirmed.

Conclusion

Despite the sequence similarities between transcription activators of E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae, these results emphasise the fundamental differences in transcription regulation between these two types of pathogenic bacteria.

Background

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is an obligate human pathogen with no known environmental reservoirs. It can be isolated from gonorrhoea patients in clinical samples in which obligately anaerobic bacteria are abundant [1, 2], suggesting that gonococci encounter and survive without oxygen in their natural habitat. Clark and her colleagues have shown that gonococci can grow anaerobically using a truncated denitrification pathway in which nitrite is reduced to nitrous oxide, catalysed by the copper-containing nitrite reductase, AniA, and the single subunit nitric oxide reductase, NorB [25]. Nitrite reduction is severely repressed by oxygen, but is induced during anaerobic growth by the global transcription factor, FNR (for regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction), and by a two-component regulatory system that we designated NarQ-NarP [5, 6]).

Until complete genome sequences became available in the last ten years, it was commonly assumed that obligate pathogens rely less on transcription control than more versatile bacteria that occupy a variety of niches outside of their mammalian hosts. With reference to N. gonorrhoeae, this impression was reinforced by the fact that ccp (encoding a cytochrome c peroxidase [5, 7]) is the only gene other than aniA that is known to be regulated by the gonococcal FNR, and by the widespread distribution of repeat DNA sequences that promote a high frequency of genetic variation-based expression control resulting in gene silencing, phase variation, and antigenic shift. The availability of the complete genome sequence and pan-Neisseria microarrays provide an opportunity to test these assumptions directly by comparing the extent of the N. gonorrhoeae FNR regulon with that of the recently-published E. coli FNR regulon [8]. As full expression of aniA in the gonococcus and both of the major nitrite reductases in E. coli all require a functional two-component regulatory system (NarQP in the gonococcus; both NarQP and NarXL in E. coli), we have also investigated the similarities and differences between the NarQP systems of these bacteria.

Results

Microarray analysis of the gonococcal FNR regulon

To determine the range of functions regulated by FNR in N. gonorrhoeae, the fnr+ parental strain, RUG7001, and its isogenic fnr mutant, RUG7022, were grown in poorly aerated cultures until oxygen became limiting and aniA expression had been induced (as indicated by the disappearance of nitrite from the medium). The fnr+ parental strain grew exponentially until the nitrite had been reduced. In contrast, the fnr mutant grew at a constant rather than an exponential rate that was similar to the oxygen-limited growth of the parental strain in the absence of nitrite (Fig. 1). To distinguish between genes differentially expressed in response to growth rate from those regulated directly by FNR in response to oxygen limitation, RNA was extracted from the fnr+ parental strain grown in the presence or absence of nitrite, and from the fnr mutant grown in the presence of nitrite. These RNA preparations were analysed using two pair wise comparisons: fnr+ gonococci growing exponentially in the presence of nitrite compared to the fnr mutant; and fnr+ gonococci growing in the absence of nitrite compared to the fnr mutant. Data were analysed according to fold-change (> 2-fold difference between the two strains) and a Student's t-test, using a cut-off p value of 0.01, reflecting the fact that six biological replicates were used in this experiment. Fourteen transcripts were more abundant in the parental strain than the fnr mutant, while six were more abundant in the mutant, suggesting FNR repression (Table 1). Five of the transcripts were more abundant in the fnr+ strain during growth in both the presence and absence of nitrite, suggesting direct FNR regulation. The most up-regulated transcripts encode a short transcript of unknown function (46.3-fold, p 1.1 × 10-5 with nitrite; 73.06-fold, p 7.3 × 10-6 without nitrite), and a putative iron uptake outer membrane protein designated OmpU (NGO1688; 12.27-fold, p 3.2 × 10-4 with nitrite; 6.6-fold, p 7.3 × 10-5 without nitrite) [[9]; see also comments in the Entrez nucleotide entry for N. meningitidis ompU, accession AF118122]. Also activated were the nitrite reductase gene, aniA (6.02-fold, p 1.9 × 10-5 with nitrite; 3.56-fold, p 8.2 × 10-4 without nitrite), NGO1215 encoding a highly conserved hypothetical protein (4.57-fold, p 4.8 × 10-4 with nitrite; 3.52-fold, p 3.2 × 10-5 without nitrite); and NGO0546 encoding the Res subunit of a Type III restriction-modification system similar to the Eco PI enzyme (2.31-fold, p 2.1 × 10-3 with nitrite; 2.88-fold, p 5.2 × 10-5 without nitrite). Nine further transcripts were more highly expressed in the fnr+ strain compared to the fnr mutant, but only during growth in the presence of nitrite. These transcripts are possibly regulated in response to growth rate rather than by FNR. Only one of these genes, NGO0602, encoding a putative MerR-family transcription regulator, was also more highly expressed in the fnr+ strain grown in the absence of nitrite (2.8-fold), but the regulation of this gene was not as statistically significant (p 0.05).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-8-35/MediaObjects/12864_2006_Article_748_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Growth characteristics of strain RUG7001 (fnr+) in the presence and absence of 5 mM sodium nitrite and strain RUG7002 (fnr) in the presence of nitrite. Since expression of the nitrite reductase AniA is dependent upon FNR, the fnr strain cannot respire nitrite.

Table 1

Genes differentially expressed in fnr+ and fnr strains of N. gonorrhoeae.

fnr++ NO2-/fnr

fnr+- NO2-/fnr

      
    

Gene number

Gene name

 

FNR binding site upstream

ChIP enrichment

      

Product

Sequence

Location

 

Transcripts more abundant in the Ratio t-test Ratio t-test fnr+ strain

46.30

1.1 × 10 p value -5

73.06

7.3 × 10 p value -6

NMB1205

 

Transcript of unknown function

TTGAT TTGAATCAA

41.5

Yes

12.27

3.2 × 10 -4

6.60

7.3 × 10 -5

NGO1688

ompU

Putative iron uptake OMP

none

 

Yes

6.02

1.9 × 10 -5

3.56

8.2 × 10 -4

NGO1276

aniA

Nitrite reductase

TTGAC TTAAATTAA

88.5

Yes §

4.57

4.8 × 10 -4

3.52

3.2 × 10 -5

NGO1215

 

Conserved hypothetical protein (COG2847)

TTAAT CTACATCAA

73.5

NE

2.31

2.1 × 10 -3

2.88

5.2 × 10 -5

NGO0546

res

Type III restriction-modification system EcoPI enzyme

TTGAA TGTGATTAT

106.5

NE

4.21

1.9 × 10 -3

ND

 

XNG1301

nosR

Regulatory protein

TTGAT TTGCATCAA

20.5

NT

2.85

3.1 × 10 -3

0.72

0.06

NGO1621

 

Putative phage associated protein

none

 

NT

2.75

1.0 × 10 -3

0.83

0.28

NGO1622

 

Putative phage associated protein

none

 

NT

2.70

4.1 × 10 -3

0.86

0.47

NGO0472

 

Putative phage associated protein

none

 

NT

2.63

1.7 × 10 -4

1.00

0.51

NGO1455

 

Putative NRAMP family Manganese/Iron transporter

none

 

NE

2.56

5.1 × 10 -3

2.80

0.05

NGO0602

 

Putative MerR family transcriptional regulator

TTGTT TCATTTCCA

130.5

NT

2.20

9.5 × 10 -3

1.21

0.16

NGO0087

 

Hypothetical protein

none

 

NT

2.10

2.0 × 10 -3

1.02

0.83

NGO0473

 

Neisseria specific protein.

GTGAT TCTGACAAA

199.5

NE

2.01

1.4 × 10 -3

1.00

0.71

NGO1615

 

Putative phage associated protein

TTCAG CTGCTTCAA

CTGAT CAGCCTCAT

70.5

25.5

NT

Transcripts more abundant in the fnr strain

0.14

9.6 × 10 -6

0.18

8.1 × 10 -6

NGO1716

 

Putative phosphotransferase

TTGAG TGAAAATAA

85.5

Yes

0.29

7.3 × 10 -3

1.23

0.39

NGO0340

cysK

Cysteine synthetase

none

 

Yes

0.47

3.4 × 10 -4

1.47

0.04

NGO0374

glnQ

Amino acid ABC transporter

none

 

NT

0.37

0.12

0.19

8.4 × 10 -6

NGO0653

dnrN

Putative NO- response protein

ATGTT CAAAACCAA

36.5

NE

0.60

0.84

0.28

2.9 × 10 -3

NGO1275

norB

Nitric oxide reductase

TGAAT TTTAAACAA

33.5

Yes §

0.91

0.31

0.49

2.6 × 10 -4

NGO1428

 

Short Neisseria specific protein

none

 

NE

The ratio of transcript intensity and Student's t-test p value are shown for each gene in each comparison; fnr+ + NO2 -/fnr and fnr+ - NO2 -/fnr. Predicted FNR binding sites with at most 3 mismatches to the consensus E. coli FNR binding site, TTGATNNNNATCAA, located up to 200 bases upstream of the translation start of the gene, are displayed. Note that positions 33.5, 88.5 etc indicate that the central bases of the inverted repeat sequence are located between bases 33 and 34, or between bases 88 and 89, upstream from the translation start. A ChIP enrichment of 60% or more is scored positive. ND, No data for this gene; NE, no enrichment; NT, not tested by ChIP. § The aniA and norB promoters are divergent; ChIP detected FNR binding to the aniA-norB region but cannot be used to resolve the two promoters.

Most down-regulated by FNR was the NGO1716 transcript encoding a putative phosphotransferase (COG3178; 0.14-fold, p 9.6 × 10-6 with nitrite; 0.18-fold, p 8.1 × 10-6 without nitrite), followed by two genes implicated in nitric oxide metabolism, dnrN (0.37-fold, p 0.12 with nitrite; 0.19-fold, p 8.4 × 10-6 without nitrite), and norB (0.6-fold, p 0.84 with nitrite; 0.28-fold, p 2.9 × 10-3 without nitrite). Two transcripts were less abundant in the parental strain during growth in the presence of nitrite: cysteine synthetase (cysK gene; NGO0340; 0.29-fold, p 7.3 × 10-3); and glnQ (NGO0374) encoding a component of an ABC-type amino acid transporter (0.47-fold; p 3.4 × 10-4). The transcript for a Neisseria-specific protein encoded by NGO1428 was more abundant in the mutant only in the absence of nitrite (0.49-fold, p 2.6 × 10-4). These data are summarized in Table 1.

The results of the microarray experiments can be interactively interrogated in an on-line graphical GBrowse database at http://tinyurl.com/fu2um, where the fold ratio, number of observations for each gene, Student's t-test, Cyber-T p-values, XNG and NGO annotations, and the microarray probe locations can be visualized, and searched using chromosomal locations, gene names, or gene identifiers. The results from each experiment can be viewed individually or in combination to compare the results, and users can add their own local annotations. The results of these experiments can also be seen in direct comparison with the expression data obtained in a previous microarray study addressing expression associated with narPQ [10].

Bioinformatic and ChIP analysis of promoters of genes differentially expressed in the fnr mutant

Putative FNR binding sites with at least a 7/10 match to the E. coli consensus, TTGATNNNNATCAA, were identified within 200 base pairs upstream of the translation start codon of eleven of the genes revealed by the microarray experiments to be differentially expressed in the fnr mutant and its parent (Table 1). A strain containing a chromosomal fnr-3xFLAG fusion was constructed (N. gonorrhoeae strain JCGC502), grown microaerobically both in the presence and absence of nitrite to the late exponential phase, DNA-binding proteins were cross linked to the chromosome, the bacteria were lysed and chromosomal DNA was sheared. Anti-FLAG antibodies were used to immunoprecipitate FNR-DNA complexes, which were de-crosslinked and the DNA released was purified. The quantity of each promoter fragment in the immunoprecipitated DNA pool was measured by realtime PCR, relative to the FNR-independent hpt promoter. Promoter fragments enriched 60% or more in at least two independent experiments scored positive (Table 1).

Only one of the fourteen genes potentially activated by FNR had previously been reported to be FNR-dependent: aniA, encoding a nitrite reductase [5, 6]. Consistent with the microarray data reported above, FNR binding to P aniA was confirmed by ChIP, providing a positive control for the ChIP data. The ChIP experiments also confirmed FNR-binding to the promoter regions of the most highly FNR-activated transcript (NMB1205) and ompU. Although the ompU promoter has no recognisable FNR binding site, multiple potential half-sites are present in the promoter region. Conversely, even though open reading frames NGO1215 and NGO0546 have potential FNR binding sites upstream, FNR binding was not detected by ChIP. This emphasises that caution is required when drawing conclusions from data based upon either of these techniques alone.

Proteomic analysis of the FNR regulon

A study of protein expression in fnr+ and fnr gonococci revealed fewer differences than were identified in the microarray study. Comparison of the cytoplasmic proteins of the fnr+ parental strain, RUG7001, and the fnr mutant, strain RUG7022, grown in the presence of nitrite revealed no significant differences in protein expression (data not shown). In contrast, three membrane proteins were more abundant in the fnr+ strain: nitrite reductase, AniA; nitric oxide reductase, NorB; and the septum site-determining cell division protein, MinD [11]. Although norB transcription is independent of FNR [12], more NorB accumulated during nitrite reduction by the fnr+ strain than in the fnr mutant. The explanation for this apparent contradiction is that transcription from the norB promoter is induced by NO [9, 12], so because AniA is not synthesised in the mutant, no NO would be generated to activate the expression of norB. As the microarray data did not identify minD expression to be activated by FNR, the apparent differential expression of MinD protein, revealed by proteomic analysis, is more likely to be due to a growth rate effect than to a direct effect of FNR.

Effects of iron deprivation and peroxide stress on an fnr mutant

In light of the altered expression of the genes associated with iron transport (ompU and the putative NRAMP family member NGO1455) it was determined whether FNR is important in metal ion uptake. The ability of a gonococcal fnr mutant to survive metal ion limitation was tested. Microaerobically grown fnr mutant and parent were treated with 200 μM dipyridyl, a chelator of iron and manganese ions. Viable counts made at regular intervals for up to one hour showed there was no significant difference in survival between the fnr+ and fnr gonococci.

Considering that genes predicted to be involved in defence against ROS (ccp [7]) or induced upon exposure to ROS (NGO1428 and NGO1716 [13]) were observed to be regulated by FNR, the ability of an fnr mutant to survive oxidative stress was tested. Oxygen-limited cultures of gonococci, both the fnr mutant and the parental strain, were subjected to 10 mM hydrogen peroxide. Viable counts taken at intervals up to one hour showed, as with the metal chelation experiment, no significant difference in survival between the fnr+ and fnr bacteria.

Why cytochrome c peroxidase was not identified as being FNR-regulated by microarray analysis

Expression of the cytochrome c peroxidase is activated by FNR in response to oxygen [5]. Mature CCP protein was detected by staining gonococcal whole cell or membrane proteins separated by SDS-PAGE for haem-dependent peroxidase activity. However, in the present microarray study, FNR-dependent expression of the ccp gene was not observed because of the low level of expression of ccp. The quantity of ccp transcript was not sufficient to generate a statistically significant signal above the background signal of the slide, and was filtered out at the pON filter stage of data analysis.

To confirm that the ccp gene is regulated by FNR, and to compare the relative activity of the ccp and aniA promoters, N. gonorrhoeae strains RUG7001, carrying a chromosomal aniA::lacZ fusion, and JCGC201 & JCGC202, fnr+ and fnr derivatives carrying ccp::lacZ, were grown microaerobically in gonococcal broth (GCB) in the presence and absence of nitrite and assayed for β-galactosidase activity after 4, 5, 6, and 7 hours of growth (Figure 2). Far less β-galactosidase activity accumulated in the ccp::lacZ fnr mutant strain than in the fnr+ strain, and the β-galactosidase activity of the fnr+ strain was higher in the absence than in the presence of nitrite. During growth in the absence of nitrite, at an OD650 of around 0.5 (corresponding to 0.2 g bacterial dry weight l-1), FNR activated P ccp 24-fold. These data support the previously reported observation that ccp expression is repressed by the presence of nitrite in an fnr+ strain [7]. Furthermore, expression of ccp was observed to be FNR-dependent in quantitative real time PCR experiments in which transcript levels in fnr mutant and wild-type strains were compared. Whereas in the parental strain ccp expression was induced 18-fold during oxygen limited growth, there was no induction of ccp expression in the fnr mutant strain. These data confirm that, while the ccp gene is not included in the list of FNR-activated genes from the microarray data due to low expression levels, the ccp promoter is activated by FNR. In addition, the ccp promoter was enriched in ChIP experiments, so was shown to bind FNR in vivo. However, these control ccp experiments illustrate a rarely documented weakness of microarray experiments, namely the problem of false negative results that, due to over-stringent use of statistical analysis, might lead to under-estimation of the number of differentially expressed genes. It also illustrates the utility of an analytical approach that incorporates exclusion of data for transcripts that do not generate detectable signals; so that those genes below the detectable thresholds are readily identified, rather than using 'flooring' or other methods for filling in low intensity or empty microarray data fields.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-8-35/MediaObjects/12864_2006_Article_748_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

A. β-galactosidase activity of the aniA::lacZ and ccp::lacZ fusions. Strains RUG7001 (aniA::lacZ), JCGC201 (ccp::lacZ), and JCGC202 (ccp::lacZ fnr) were grown in liquid culture with or without 5 mM NaNO 2 . Samples were taken at hourly intervals, β-galactosidase activity measured, and the β-galactosidase activities plotted against optical density at 650 nm. B. Data for the JCGC201 (ccp::lacZ) and JCGC202 (ccp::lacZ fnr) fusions are shown on an expanded scale to illustrate more clearly the effects of FNR and nitrite on ccp expression.

The gonococcal NarQP cannot complement an E. coli narQP mutation

The microarray data revealed fundamental differences between the FNR regulons of E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae, not least in that the gonococcal FNR regulon is very small compared with its E. coli counterpart. However, in both organisms, expression of the major nitrite reductases is co-activated by FNR and a two-component regulatory system, NarQ-NarP, that bind to similar target sequences located at almost identical positions relative to the respective transcription start sites (P aniA in N. gonorrhoeae; P nirB in E. coli [5, 6, 1418]). We have previously demonstrated that a single amino acid substitution is sufficient to enable the gonococcal FNR to complement an E. coli fnr mutation. It was therefore of interest to determine whether the gonococcal NarQ-NarP could complement E. coli mutants defective in both NarXL and NarQP.

The gonococcal narQP genes were expressed in E. coli under the control of the E. coli fnr promoter from plasmid pGCNarQP, and the ability of the gonococcal NarQP proteins to activate the E. coli nirB promoter was assessed [19]. Expression of the E. coli nitrite reductase NirBD is activated by FNR in response to oxygen limitation and by NarQP in response to the availability of nitrate or nitrite [20]. E. coli strains JCB386 (nirB::lacZ), JCB3861 (nirB::lacZ narXL), JBC3863 (nirB::lacZ narXLQP), and JCB3863 transformed with pGCNarQP were grown anaerobically in the presence or absence of 5 mM NaNO2 or 20 mM NaNO3 and β-galactosidase activities measured (Table 2A).
Table 2

Complementation of E. coli narXLQP mutations by gonococcal NarQ and NarQP.

Host strain

Host genotype

Plasmid

Reporter

β-galactosidase activity

    

Ø2

+ NO2 -

+ NO3 -

A. Complementation of a narXLQP mutation

JCB386

 

none

nirB::lacZ

120

650

1200

JCB3861

narXL

none

nirB::lacZ

80

130

570

JCB3863

narXLQP

none

nirB::lacZ

49

39

61

JCB3863

narXLQP

pGCNarQP

nirB::lacZ

64

67

81

B. Phosphorylation of E. coli NarP by gonococcal NarQ

JCB391

narXLQ

none

napF::lacZ

130

110

120

JCB391

narXLQ

pBADgcQ

napF::lacZ

1630

1390

1350

C. Phosphorylation of E. coli NarL by gonococcal NarQ

JCB12

narXQ

none

frdA::lacZ

2830

2070

2570

JCB12

narXQ

pBADgcQ

frdA::lacZ

780

650

820

E. coli transformed with the stated plasmids was grown anaerobically in LB in A. and B. and in minimal medium in C. in the absence or presence of 2.5 mM NaNO2 or 20 mM NaNO3 and the β-galactosidase activities determined.

In E. coli strain JCB386, the nirB promoter is activated in response to both nitrite and nitrate. Activation in the presence of nitrite is reduced in strain JCB3861, which lacks NarXL. In the narXLQP strain JCB3863, nirB activity is very low in all three growth conditions, since NarQP is required for activation in the presence of nitrite or nitrate. When transformed with pGCNarQP, strain JCB3863 has similarly low β-galactosidase activities in all three conditions. Expression of the gonococcal narQP genes from pGCNarQP was verified by RT-PCR (data not shown). Therefore, it was concluded that gonococcal NarQP cannot complement an E. coli narXLQP mutation at P nirB .

Ligand sensing and signal transduction characteristics of the gonococcal NarQ

Only a very limited range of genetic techniques are available to investigate sensor kinases and response regulators by site-directed mutagenesis and gene deletions in the gonococcus. However, as some sensor kinases have been shown to phosphorylate response regulators of a heterologous host [21, 22], the ability of gonococcal NarQ to phosphorylate the E. coli NarP protein was assessed to investigate the ligand sensing and signal transduction characteristics of the gonococcal NarQ and NarP proteins. Strain JCB391 (narXL narQ) and JCB391 transformed with pBADgcQ, expressing gonococcal narQ, each co-transformed with pRNW15 carrying napF::lacZ, were grown anaerobically in the presence or absence of nitrate and nitrite and their β-galactosidase activities determined (Table 2B). The NarP-dependent napF promoter was not activated during growth in the presence of nitrite and nitrate in strain JCB391, since the NarQ sensor kinase was not present and NarP was unable to become phosphorylated, but was activated constitutively in strain JCB391 expressing the gonococcal NarQ from pBADgcQ. The explanation for this observation is that the gonococcal NarQ was constitutively phosphorylating the E. coli NarP protein, which was activating transcription. This was the first indication that the gonococcal NarQ sensor kinase might be ligand-insensitive and constitutively active in E. coli.

Expression of the E. coli fumarate reductase operon, frdABCD, is activated by FNR in response to oxygen limitation but repressed by NarL in response to the availability of nitrate or nitrite [23]. Due to the absence of a 7-2-7 inverted repeat sequence (where the 7 bases are the NarL heptamer), NarP is unable to bind at this promoter [24]. If the gonococcal NarQ is constitutively active, it should also be able to activate E. coli NarL and hence repress transcription at P frd . Strain JCB12 (frdA::lacZ narXQ) and strain JCB12 transformed with pBADgcQ expressing gonococcal NarQ, were grown anaerobically in the presence or absence of nitrate and nitrite and their β-galactosidase activities were determined (Table 2C). The frdA promoter was activated in all three conditions in strain JCB12, but was repressed in all three conditions by strain JCB12 expressing the gonococcal NarQ from pBADgcQ, as expected if the gonococcal NarQ was continually phosphorylating the E. coli NarL protein and therefore constitutively active in E. coli.

Mutations in the P-box of E. coli NarQ do not alter ligand specificity

Previous studies have revealed residues in a periplasmic region of the E. coli NarQ and NarX proteins, the P-box, that are important for ligand sensing and discrimination between nitrate and nitrite [2528]. Only ten of the 18 residues that comprise the gonococcal P-box are the same as those of either the E. coli NarQ or NarX proteins. Four residues are proposed to be important for ligand discrimination in E. coli NarX (H45, K49, R54 and R59); substitutions at any of these residues result in NarX proteins with altered ligand sensing characteristics [28]. Of these four, only R59 is conserved in the gonococcal NarQ. The residue in gonococcal NarQ corresponding to R54 is a lysine; an R54K substitution in E. coli NarX results in a ligand-insensitive phenotype. To determine whether the differences in the P-box of gonococcal NarQ determined nitrite specificity, the E. coli NarQ P-box was mutated to resemble the gonococcal P-box (Table 3). Mutated NarQ proteins were expressed in E. coli strains mutated in narX and narQ and their ability to activate nirB::lacZ or repress frdA::lacZ chromosomal fusions was assessed using β-galactosidase assays (Table 3). Substitutions in both single and multiple residues resulted in NarQ proteins that were inactive and ligand insensitive, a "locked-off" phenotype.
Table 3

P-box substitutions in E. coli NarQ.

Plasmid

Substitutions

P-box sequence

Phenotype

pBADEcQ

E. coli NarQ P-box

DAEAINIAGSLRMQSYRL

Nitrate and nitrite sensing

pRNW18

R54K

DAEAINIAGSLK MQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW19

N48E I49E

DAEAIEE AGSLRMQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW20

N48E I49E R54K

DAEAIEE AGSLK MQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW29

D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E

A ASV IEE AGSLRMQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW30

D43A E45S A46V

A ASV INIAGSLRMQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW31

D43A E45S A46V R54K

A ASV INIAGSLK MQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW32

D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E R54K

A ASV IEE AGSLK MQSYRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW33

D43A E45S A46V S52N S57A

A ASV INIAGN LRMQA YRL

Ligand insensitive

pRNW34

D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E S52N R54K S57A

A ASV IEE AGN LK MQA YRL

Ligand insensitive

E. coli strains JCB391 (narXL narQ) or JCB12 (narXL narQ frdA::lacZ) transformed with pBADecQ expressing wild-type or mutated NarQ proteins were grown anaerobically in LB in the absence or presence of 20 mM NaNO3 and the β-galactosidase activities determined. Mutations in the P box are shown in bold type. Wild-type NarQ was able to phosphorylate NarP in the presence of nitrate, activating expression of nirB and repressing frdA. Mutated NarQ proteins were inactive.

Discussion

Contrasts between the N. gonorrhoeae and E. coli FNR and NarP regulons

The first conclusion from this study is that the N. gonorrhoeae FNR and NarP regulons are both much smaller than their E. coli counterparts. Constantinidou et al. [8] estimated that at least 104, and possibly a many as 115, E. coli operons are regulated directly by FNR, including 68 that are induced, and 36 that are repressed: the FNR regulon of the pathogenic E. coli O157 is of a similar size (Overton, Constantinidou and Cole, unpublished data). The corresponding figures for the gonococcus are that at most 14 transcripts are induced by FNR, and 6 are repressed. Based upon DNA sequence analysis and ChIP experiments, even this might be an over-estimate of the genes that are directly regulated by FNR. However, it is similar to the 9 transcription units recently proposed to be activated by FNR in the closely related pathogen, Neisseria meningitidis [29]. These authors derived a consensus sequence for meningococcal FNR-binding sites that differed at one position from the consensus FNR-binding site in E. coli. However, three lines of evidence indicate that the consensus gonococcal FNR binding site is identical to that of E. coli FNR: (i) there is a perfect match to the E. coli consensus sequence in the regulatory region of the N. gonorrhoeae transcript that is most dependent upon FNR; (ii) Overton et al. [14] showed that a single amino acid substitution, S18F in the N-terminal domain, which is located well away from the DNA recognition helix, enables the gonococcal FNR to activate a range of FNR-dependent promoters as effectively as the E. coli FNR, suggesting that they have similar site specificities; and (iii) unsubstituted gonococcal FNR can function as a repressor at E. coli FNR-binding sites, again suggesting that they have similar, or even identical, specificities [14].

The ccp promoter was not identified in the microarray study to be part of the FNR regulon, raising the question whether other members of the gonococcal FNR regulon had been missed because they also are expressed at a level below the threshold set in this analysis. However, close inspection of the raw data failed to reveal additional candidates that, like ccp, were false negatives. Nevertheless, the ccp example provides clear evidence that false negative results, like false positive results, can be a problem in microarray analysis.

We recently showed that the list of transcripts differentially expressed in a gonococcal narP mutant and its parent is even smaller than the corresponding list for the FNR regulon, and inverted repeat sequences similar to the binding site for E. coli NarP were readily identified in only four promoter regions [10]. The N. gonorrhoeae NarP is only distantly related to the E. coli NarP or NarL (42% and 41.5% sequence identity, respectively), so although gonococcal NarP can recognise and bind to the same inverted repeat sequence as E. coli NarP, it is not surprising that it cannot functionally complement E. coli narXL or narQP mutants. Apart from genes involved in denitrification, only two transcripts encoding proteins of unknown function were regulated by NarP, unlike in E. coli in which there is an extensive regulon of genes involved in anaerobic metabolism that are repressed by nitrate-activated NarP [8].

The proposal that NarQ from N. gonorrhoeae is a ligand insensitive sensor kinase locked on in its kinase mode is also fully supported by experiments presented in Tables 2 and 3, consistent with the fundamental differences in nitrate and nitrite sensing between the two types of bacteria. E. coli NarQ is exquisitely sensitive to nitrate, but two orders of magnitude less sensitive to nitrite [30]. In contrast, gonococcal NarQ is insensitive to both nitrate and nitrite, and induction of aniA transcription in the presence of nitrite requires inactivation of the repressor, NsrR, not by nitrite but by the product of nitrite reduction, nitric oxide [10]. As gonococci lack the alternative electron transfer pathways that in E. coli are subject to NarP repression and that they are unable to metabolise nitrate, it is entirely consistent that they also lack a nitrate-sensing two-component regulatory system. Consequently, data in Table 2 show that gonococcal NarQ can constitutively phosphorylate E. coli NarL or NarP. Conversely, amino acid substitutions that make the P box of E. coli NarQ more like that of the gonococcal NarQ simply inactivate signal transduction (Table 3), as had been found in previous detailed site-directed mutagenesis experiments of E. coli NarX [2528].

Conclusion

Both E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae are Gram-negative human pathogens that show adaptation to, and are able to live in, anaerobic niches as part of their normal colonization-transmission cycles within the host. Both species utilize a common regulator, FNR, in the control of this response. However, this study shows that whereas a wide range of responses and physiological adaptations are coordinated by this FNR in E. coli, the adaptations are far fewer and are specifically and primarily focussed upon the immediate metabolic needs for utilising alternate electron acceptors under anaerobic conditions in N. gonorrhoeae. As such, while this regulator controls what appears to be a fully integrated response in E. coli, in N. gonorrhoeae the response is essentially independent of the other physiological changes required for adaptation to anaerobic growth. Furthermore, differences between the ligand sensing and signal transduction capabilities of the E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae NarQ-NarP proteins were revealed. This illustrates fundamental differences between the way in which environmental responses are controlled and integrated in these two species, and highlights the importance of specific investigations of species with different adaptation strategies.

Methods

Strains, plasmids, oligonucleotide primers, and gene identification numbers used in this study

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 4. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers are available see Additional file 1. The XNG gene identification numbers used for some genes in this study (those not annotated in the GenBank database) refer to the genome sequence annotation of N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 that was used in the design of the pan-Neisseria microarray [31] and pan-Neisseria microarray-v2 [32]. A GBrowse database containing this annotation comparatively presented against other neisserial genome annotations can be found at http://www.compbio.ox.ac.uk/data. COG identifications were made using the NCBI Conserved Domain Search tool [33].
Table 4

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Strain

Description

Source

N. gonorrhoeae strains

F62

Parental strain

Laboratory stocks

RUG7001

F62 proAB paniA::lacZ

[43]

RUG7022

F62 proAB paniA::lacZ fnr

[6]

JCGC201

F62 proAB pccp::lacZ

[5]

JCGC202

F62 proAB pccp::lacZ fnr

[5]

JCGC502

F62 fnr- 3xFLAG KanR

This work

E. coli strains

RV

Parental strain

Laboratory stocks

JCB386

Δ (nirB-cycG) pnirB::lacZ

[44]

JCB3861

JCB386 narXL

This work

JCB3862

JCB386 narXL narQ

This work

JCB3863

JCB386 narXL narQ narP

This work

JCB391

RV narXL narQ pcnB

This work

JCB12

RV narX narQ frdA::lacZ

[10]

Plasmids

pGCFNR3

Gonococcal fnr, under the regulation of the E. coli fnr promoter, cloned into pBR322.

[5]

pGCFNRi

pGCFNR3 with Kpn I and Xho I restriction sites engineered downstream of the fnr gene

This work

pGCFNR-FLAG

pGCFNR3 with a 3xFLAG tag and Kanamycin resistance cassette inserted downstream of the fnr gene

This work

pSUB11

Epitope tagging plasmid carrying 3xFLAG tag and kanamycin resistance cassette.

[36]

pGCNarQP

Gonococcal narQP genes under the control of the E. coli fnr promoter cloned into pBR322.

This work

pBADgcQ

Gonococcal narQ gene under the control of the araBAD promoter cloned into pBAD myc-His A.

This work

pBADecQ

E. coli narQ gene under the control of the araBAD promoter cloned into pBAD myc-His A

This work

pRNW18

pBADEcQ containing R54K substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW19

pBADEcQ containing N48E I49E substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW20

pBADEcQ containing N48E I49E R54K substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW29

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW30

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW31

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V R54K substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW32

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E R54K substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW33

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V S52N S57A substitution in narQ

This work

pRNW34

pBADEcQ containing D43A E45S A46V N48E I49E S52N R54K S57A substitution in narQ

This work

p7150

E. coli nirB promoter cloned into the lacZ reporter vector pRW50.

[19]

pRNW15

E. coli napF promoter cloned into the lacZ reporter vector pRW50.

This work

Growth of N. gonorrhoeae

N. gonorrhoeae was grown on gonococcal agar plates and in gonococcal broth (GCB) supplied by BD. Solid and liquid media were supplemented with 1 % (v/v) Kellogg's Supplement [34]. For liquid cultures, 2 μl of a stock of N. gonorrhoeae was plated onto a gonococcal agar plate and incubated in a candle jar at 37°C for 24 hours. Bacteria from this plate were swabbed onto a second plate and incubated in the same way for a further 16 hours. The entire bacterial growth from this second plate was swabbed into 10 ml of GCB and incubated at 37°C in an orbital shaker at 100 rpm for one hour. This 10 ml pre-culture was then tipped into 50 ml of GCB in a 100 ml conical flask and incubated in the same way. For growth with nitrite, the pre-culture was supplemented with 0.5 mM NaNO2 and the flasks were supplemented with 5 mM NaNO2.

Preparation of RNA for microarray experiments

Samples (10 ml) of bacterial culture were mixed with an equal volume of RNAlater (Ambion), the bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 0.5 ml of RNAlater and stored at 4°C overnight. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in TRIzol (Invitrogen) by vortexing for ten minutes. Chloroform was added, the phases were separated and the aqueous phase was transferred to a clean tube. Crude RNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated with isopropanol and cleaned using an RNeasy kit (QIAGEN). Purified RNA was eluted in RNase-free water with 2 % (v/v) SuperaseIN RNase inhibitor (Ambion).

cDNA generation, labelling, and microarray hybridisation

Reagents and enzymes for the preparation of materials for microarray hybridisations were sourced from the 3DNA Array 900 MPX kit (Genisphere, PA, USA) unless otherwise stated. One microgram of RNA was reverse transcribed into unlabelled cDNA using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42°C for two hours. The cDNA was cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column (Zymo Research) and poly-T tailed with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Dye-specific capture sequences were ligated to the poly-T tails and the tagged cDNAs were cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column. The pan-Neisseria microarray v-2 [32], containing probes to N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis genes, was used for these experiments. Microarray slides were pre-hybridised in 3.5 × SSC, 0.1 % SDS and 10 mg mL-1 BSA for 65°C for 20 minutes, washed with water and isopropanol, dried with an airbrush, and pre-scanned to check for array defects. The capture sequence tagged cDNAs were hybridised onto the microarray slide for 16 h at 60°C in a SlideBooster with the power setting at 25 and a pulse/pause ratio of 3:7. Following the first hybridisation, the slides were washed in 2 × SSC, 0.2 % SDS for 10 min. at 60°C, followed by washes at 2 × SSC and 0.2 × SSC for ten minutes, each at room temperature. The slides were dried with an airbrush and hybridised with the Cy 3 and Cy 5 capture reagents at 55°C for 4 h in a SlideBooster. The slides were again washed in 2 × SSC, 0.2 % SDS (10 min. at 60°C) followed by 10 min. room temperature washes in 2 × SSC and 0.2 × SSC (10 min. at room temperature) and dried with an airbrush. Dried slides were scanned using a ScanArray ExpressHT (Perkin Elmer) using autocalibration. For slides PNA6_29 – PNA6_39 this scanner was unavailable and the image data was collected using a GenePix 4000B (Axon Instruments) and manual calibration.

Microarray data analysis

Where necessary, scanned microarray images were straightened with ImageViewer (BlueGnome). Images were analysed using BlueFuse for Microarrays (BlueGnome). Spot data were extracted from images and manually flagged to remove artefacts before fusion. Fused data were filtered according to pON value [35]. Spots with pON values less than 0.5 in both channels were excluded to eliminate the bias generated by the inclusion of unhybridized spots in the statistical interpretation of the data, and the data globally adjusted such that the mean rRNA ratio was 1.0. The data were then analysed using BASE. For each pair wise comparison, gene expression median fold-changes were calculated from the biological replicates using the MGH fold-change algorithm, and the Student's t-test was used to assess statistical significance. Since six biological replicates were analysed, a p value of 0.01 was used. Genes whose transcript levels did not change consistently (i.e. more or less abundant in the mutant compared to the parental strain) in all the biological replicates in which they were detected for each experiment were discarded. Data were also analysed using a locally prepared implementation of the Cyber-T algorithm within BASE; the results from this analysis is available online at http://tinyurl.com/fu2um. Total microarray data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/ with the accession number E-MEXP-726.

Generation of a chromosomal FNR-3xFLAG fusion in N. gonorrhoeae

Codons for a 3x FLAG tag, (DYKDDDDK)3, were linked in-frame to the 3' end of the fnr gene on the chromosome of N. gonorrhoeae strain F62. Plasmid pGCFNR3 contains the gonococcal fnr gene and 500 bp of downstream sequence under the control of the E. coli fnr promoter [5]. Inverse PCR, using primers FNRiPCRFwd and FNRiPCRRwd was used to introduce a Kpn I restriction site in place of the fnr gene stop codon and an Xho I site immediately downstream of the fnr gene, yielding plasmid pGCFNRi. Sequences of all oligonucleotide primers used in this study are available on-line in Table S1. The kanamycin resistance cassette and the 3x FLAG tag encoded by pSUB11 [36] were amplified by PCR using primers FLAGFwd and FLAGRwd, which introduced Kpn I and Xho I sites at either end of the resultant fragment. The KanR-3x FLAG fragment and pGCFNRi were digested with Kpn I and Xho I, the plasmid fragment was dephosphorylated with calf alkaline phosphatase, and the two fragments were ligated to form plasmid pGCFNR-FLAG. Western blotting was used to show that pGCFNR-FLAG expressed a 30 kDa FLAG-tagged protein in E. coli, corresponding to the gonococcal FNR. To transfer the fnr-3x FLAG-KanR fragment into N. gonorrhoeae, pGCFNR-FLAG was digested with Hin dIII and Bam HI and the 3.5 kb fnr-3x FLAG-KanR fragment was purified by phenol chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Piliated N. gonorrhoeae strain F62 was transformed with this linear DNA fragment, which recombined with the fnr locus on the gonococcal chromosome yielding strain JCGC502. To confirm that the FLAG-tagged FNR protein was still functional and able to activate aniA expression, the ability of strain JCGC502 to utilise nitrite was determined. Cultures of JCGC502 were grown microaerobically in the presence and absence of nitrite and optical densities were measured at hourly intervals. Strain JCGC502 grew exponentially and respired nitrite, therefore AniA was expressed and the FLAG-tagged FNR protein was functional. In addition, samples taken from the cultures at hourly intervals were probed by Western blotting to determine the quantity of FNR-3xFLAG present (see Additional file 2). No significant differences were observed either over the course of the growth curves or between cultures grown in the presence or absence of nitrite. These data confirm that gonococcal FNR activity is likely to be modulated by oxygen in a manner similar to the E. coli FNR protein, rather than expression level, as it the case of some other CRP-FNR superfamily members such as Bradyrhizobium japonicum FixK2 [37].

Western blotting

Gonococcal proteins separated by Tris/Tricine SDS-PAGE using a 15% polyacrylamide gel were blotted onto a PVDF membrane and FLAG-tagged FNR protein was detected using anti-FLAG monoclonal antibodies (Sigma) and the ECL-Plus chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Interactions between FNR and promoter DNA were studied in vivo by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) as described by Grainger et al. [38]. N. gonorrhoeae strain JCGC502 was grown microaerobically with or without 5 mM NaNO2 to late exponential phase. Protein-DNA crosslinking, chromatin preparation, and immunoprecipitations were as described previously except that the tagged protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibodies (Sigma) for 16 h at 4°C. The concentration of immunoprecipitated promoter fragments was measured using quantitative real time PCR [39]. Primers for each promoter were designed using PrimerExpress (Applied Biosystems) and are listed in Table S1. The promoter of the hpt (NG2035) gene, which is not regulated by FNR and is not preceded by an FNR binding site, was a negative control used to normalise the data. Promoter fragments enriched by 60% or more in at least two independent ChIP experiments, relative to the hpt promoter fragment, were scored positive.

Construction of E. coli strains

The narXL genes were deleted from E. coli strain JCB386 using the gene-replacement method [36]. Primers EcnarXp1 and EcnarLp2 were used to amplify the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene from plasmid pKD3 [40] resulting in a cat cassette flanked by DNA with sequence homology to upstream and downstream of the narXL genes. This linear DNA fragment was electroporated into strain E. coli JCB386 containing pKD46, encoding the λ Red recombinase, which mediated recombination of the chloramphenicol resistance cassette into the E. coli chromosome and replacement of the narXL genes with the cat gene. Transformation of the narXL::chlR strain with pCP20, encoding FLP recombinase, resulted in loss of the chloramphenicol resistance gene and creation of an unmarked narXL deletion in strain JCB3861. The narQ deletion was generated by the same method, using primers EcnarQp1 and EcnarQp2, resulting in strain JCB3862 (narXL narQ). The narP deletion was transferred using P1 transduction; strain JCB3862 was transduced with bacteriophage P1 that had been propagated on E. coli strain JCB3875 which carries a narP::chlR mutation [17], generating strain JCB3863 (narXL narQ narP). Strain JCB391 was generated by successive transduction of the narXL::chlR and narQ::chlR mutations into strain RV followed by removal of the antibiotic resistance cassettes using pCP20. The pcnB::kanR mutation, effectively reducing the plasmid copy number to one, was transferred from strain RP7974 [41].

Construction of plasmids expressing gonococcal and E. coli narQP

The gonococcal narQP genes were amplified from chromosomal DNA by PCR using primers NgNarQPNcoI and NgNarQPBamHI, generating a fragment with Nco I and Bam HI sites at each end. The resultant PCR product and pGCFNR3 were both digested with Nco I and Bam HI and ligated, yielding pGCNarQP. For plasmid pBADgcQ, the gonococcal narQ gene was cloned into the arabinose-inducible pBAD myc-hisA overexpression vector using primers NgNarQNcoI and NgNarQHindIII to generate an Nco I – Hin dIII narQ fragment, which was ligated into Nco I -Hin dIIIdigested pBAD myc-hisA (Invitrogen). Similarly, pBADecQ contained the E. coli narQ gene cloned into pBAD myc-hisA. Primers EcNarQ Nco I and EcNarQ Bam HI were used to generate a Nco I-Bam HI E. coli narQ fragment, which was cloned into pBAD myc-hisA.

The Quikchange site-directed mutagenesis system (Stratagene) was used to generate specific mutations in the P-box region of the E. coli narQ gene using primers listed in Table S1: Primer pair SDM1 R-K FWD & RVS were used to generate substitution R54K; pair SDM2 NI-EE FWD & RVS substitutions N48E & I49E; SDM3 DAEA-AASV FWD & REV substitutions D43A E45S & A46V ; SDM4 DAEA-AASV FWD & RVS substitutions D43A E45S & A46V; and SDM5 SS-NA FWD & RVS substitutions S52N & S57A. Substitutions were combined by stepwise mutagenesis in plasmids pRNW18-34 as listed in Table 4.

β-galactosidase assay

E. coli was grown at 37°C or 30°C in LB (Luria-Bertani) medium with 0.4 % glucose or in minimal medium [42] supplemented with 40 mM sodium fumarate, 10 % LB and 0.4 % glycerol. Where stated, cultures were supplemented with 20 mM NaNO3 or 2.5 mM NaNO2. Two ml aliquots of bacterial cultures were lysed by the addition of 30 μl each toluene and 2 % (w/v) sodium deoxycholate and aerated at 30°C for 20 minutes. Lysates were assayed for β-galactosidase activity as previously described [15].

Sequence pattern searching

Potential FNR binding sites were located in promoter regions using Findpatterns in the GCG suite (Accelrys, Cambridge, UK) using the consensus E. coli FNR binding site, TTGATNNNNATCAA, to search the gonococcal DNA sequences.

Notes

Abbreviations

ChIP: 

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

FNR: 

regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction

NsrR: 

nitrosative stress response regulator

qRT-PCR: 

quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

HAMP: 

histidine kinase, adenylate cyclase, methyl-accepting protein and phosphotransferase domain

TMII: 

second transmembrane region

RNS: 

Reactive Nitrogen Species

ROS: 

Reactive Oxygen Species

OMP: 

outer membrane protein

CDS: 

coding sequence.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank D. Grainger and S. Busby for help with the ChIP experiments and for helpful discussions, and A. Jones for use of the Birmingham School of Biosciences genomics and proteomics facilities. This study was funded by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Project Grant P21080, and by an MRC PhD training studentship to RNW. The microarray printing and other facilities were supported by funding from the EPA Cephalosporin Trust. The microarray data analysis and LIMS facilities and support were provided by the Dunn School/Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Computational Biology Research Group.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham
(2)
The Bacterial Pathogenesis and Functional Genomics Group, The Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford
(3)
The Computational Biology Research Group, The Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford
(4)
The Medical School, The University of Birmingham

References

  1. Burnakis TG, Hildebrandt NB: Pelvic inflammatory disease: a review with emphasis on antimicrobial therapy. Rev Infect Dis. 1986, 8: 86-116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark VL, Knapp JS, Thompson S, Klimpel KW: Presence of antibodies to the major anaerobically induced gonococcal outer membrane protein in sera from patients with gonococcal infections. Microb Pathog. 1988, 5: 381-90. 10.1016/0882-4010(88)90038-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Knapp JS, Clark VL: Anaerobic growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae coupled to nitrite reduction. Infect Immun. 1984, 46: 176-181.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark VL, Campbell LA, Palermo DA, Evans TM, Klimpel KW: Induction and repression of outer membrane proteins by anaerobic growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect Immun. 1987, 55: 1359-64.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lissenden S, Mohan S, Overton T, Regen T, Crooke H, Cardinale JA, Householder TC, Adams P, O'Connor CD, Clark VL, Smith H, Cole JA: Identification of transcription activators that regulate gonococcal adaptation from aerobic to anaerobic or oxygen-limited growth. Mol Microbiol. 2000, 37: 839-855. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02050.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Householder TC, Belli WA, Lissenden S, Cole JA, Clark VL: cis- and trans-Acting Elements Involved in Regulation of aniA, the Gene Encoding the Major Anaerobically Induced Outer Membrane Protein in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 541-551.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Turner S, Reid E, Smith H, Cole JA: A novel cytochrome c peroxidase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a lipoprotein from a Gram-negative bacterium. Biochem J. 2003, 373: 865-873. 10.1042/BJ20030088.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Constantinidou CC, Hobman JL, Patel MD, Penn CW, Cole JA, Overton TW: A reassessment of the fumarate and nitrate reduction regulon and transcriptomic analysis of the effects of nitrate, nitrite, NarXL and NarQP as Escherichia coli adapts from aerobic to anaerobic growth. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 4802-4808. 10.1074/jbc.M512312200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mey AR, Craig SA, Payne SM: Characterization of Vibrio cholerae RyhB: the RyhB regulon and role of RyhB in biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 5706-5709. 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5706-5719.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Overton TW, Whitehead R, Li Y, Snyder LA, Saunders NJ, Smith H, Cole JA: Coordinated regulation of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae truncated denitrification pathway by the nitric oxide-sensitive repressor, NsrR, and nitrite-insensitive NarQ-NarP. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 33115-33126. 10.1074/jbc.M607056200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Raskin DM, de Boer PA: MinDE-dependent pole-to-pole oscillation of division inhibitor MinC in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 6419-6424.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Householder TC, Fozo EM, Cardinale JA, Clark VL: Gonococcal Nitric Oxide Reductase Is Encoded by a Single Gene, norB, Which Is Required for Anaerobic Growth and Is Induced by Nitric Oxide. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 5241-5246. 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5241-5246.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Stohl EA, Criss AK, Seifert HS: The transcriptome response of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to hydrogen peroxide reveals genes with previously uncharacterized roles in oxidative damage protection. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 58: 520-32. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04839.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Overton T, Reid EGF, Foxall R, Smith H, Busby SJW, Cole JA: Transcription activation at Escherichia coli FNR-dependent promoters by the gonococcal FNR protein: Effects of a novel S18F substitution and comparisons with the corresponding substitution in E. coli FNR. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 4734-4747. 10.1128/JB.185.16.4734-4747.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayaraman P-S, Peakman T, Busby SJW, Quincey R, Cole JA: Location and sequence of the promoter of the gene for the NADH-dependent nitrite reductase of Escherichia coli and its regulation by oxygen, the FNR protein and nitrite. J Mol Biol. 1987, 196: 781-788. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90404-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tyson KL, Bell AI, Cole JA, Busby SJW: Definition of the nitrite and nitrate response elements at the anaerobically inducible Escherichia coli nirB promoter: interactions between FNR and NarL. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 7: 151-157. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01106.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tyson KL, Cole JA, Busby SJW: Nitrite and nitrate regulation at the promoters of two Escherichia coli operons encoding nitrite reductase: identification of common target heptamers from NarP- and NarL-dependent regulation. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13: 1045-1055. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00495.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu HC, Tyson KL, Cole JA, Busby SJW: Regulation of the E. coli nir operon by two transcription factors: a new mechanism to account for co-dependence on two activators. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 27: 493-505. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00699.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bell AI, Cole JA, Busby SJW: Molecular genetic analysis of an FNR-dependent anaerobically-inducible Escherichia coli promoter. Mol Microbiol. 1990, 4: 1753-1763. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00553.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Darwin AJ, Stewart V: Nitrate and nitrite regulation of the Fnr-dependent aeg-46.5 promoter of Escherichia coli K-12 is mediated by competition between homologous response regulators (NarL and NarP) for a common DNA-binding site. J Mol Biol. 1995, 251: 15-29. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0412.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacquelin DK, Filiberti A, Argarana CE, Barra JL: Pseudomonas aeruginosa MutL protein functions in Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 2005, 388: 879-887. 10.1042/BJ20042073.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Georgellis D, Kwon O, Lin EC, Wong SM, Akerley BJ: Redox signal transduction by the ArcB sensor kinase of Haemophilus influenzae lacking the PAS domain. J Bacteriol. 183: 7206-7212. 10.1128/JB.183.24.7206-7212.2001.
  23. Kalman LV, Gunsalus RP: Identification of a second gene involved in global regulation of fumarate reductase and other nitrate-controlled genes for anaerobic respiration in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 3810-3816.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Darwin AJ, Tyson KL, Busby SJW, Stewart V: Differential regulation by the homologous response regulators NarL and NarP of Escherichia coli K-12 depends on DNA binding site arrangement. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 25: 583-595. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4971855.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cavicchioli R, Chiang RC, Kalman LV, Gunsalus RP: Role of the periplasmic domain of the Escherichia coli NarX sensor-transmitter protein in nitrate-dependent signal transduction and gene regulation. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 21: 901-911. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.491422.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chiang RC, Cavicchioli R, Gunsalus RP: "Locked-on" and "locked-off" signal transduction mutations in the periplasmic domain of the Escherichia coli NarQ and NarX sensors affect nitrate- and nitrite-dependent regulation by NarL and NarP. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 24: 1049-1060. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4131779.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams SB, Stewart V: Nitrate- and nitrite-sensing protein NarX of Escherichia coli K-12: mutational analysis of the amino-terminal tail and first transmembrane segment. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 721-729.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams SB, Stewart V: Discrimination between structurally related ligands nitrate and nitrite controls autokinase activity of the NarX transmembrane signal transducer of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 26: 911-925. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6262002.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bartolini E, Frigimelica E, Giovinazzi S, Galli G, Welsch JA, Granoff DM, Grandi G, Grifantini R: Role of FNR and FNR-regulated, sugar fermentation genes in Neisseria meningitidis infection. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 60: 963-72. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05163.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang H, Tseng C-P, Gunsalus RP: The napF and narG nitrate reductase operons in Escherichia coli are differentially expressed in response to submicromolar concentrations of nitrate but not nitrite. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 5303-5308.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Snyder LA, Davies JK, Saunders NJ: Microarray genomotyping of key experimental strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae reveals gene complement diversity and five new neisserial genes associated with Minimal Mobile Elements. BMC Genomics. 2004, 5: 23-10.1186/1471-2164-5-23.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Snyder LA, Jarvis SA, Saunders NJ: Complete and variant forms of the 'gonococcal genetic island' in Neisseria meningitidis. Microbiol. 2005, 151: 4005-4013. 10.1099/mic.0.27925-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH: CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nuc Acids Res. 2004, W327-31. 10.1093/nar/gkh454. 32 Web Server
  34. Kellogg DS, Peacock WL, Deacon WE, Brown L, Pirkle CI: Neisseria gonorrhoeae. I. Virulence genetically linked to clonal variation. J Bacteriol. 1963, 85: 1274-1279.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder LA, Saunders NJ: The majority of genes in the pathogenic Neisseria species are present in non-pathogenic Neisseria lactamica, including those designated as 'virulence genes'. BMC Genomics. 2006, 30: 128-10.1186/1471-2164-7-128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Uzzau S, Figueroa-Bossi N, Rubino S, Bossi L: Epitope tagging of chromosomal genes in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001, 98: 15264-15269. 10.1073/pnas.261348198.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Mesa S, Ucurum Z, Hennecke H, Fischer HM: Transcription activation in vitro by the Bradyrhizobium japonicum regulatory protein FixK2. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 3329-38. 10.1128/JB.187.10.3329-3338.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Grainger DC, Overton TW, Reppas N, Wade JT, Tamai E, Hobman JL, Constantinidou CC, Struhl K, Church G, Busby SJ: Genomic Studies with Escherichia coli MelR Protein: Applications of Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and Microarrays. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 6938-6943. 10.1128/JB.186.20.6938-6943.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Aparicio O, Geisberg JV, Sekinger E, Yang A, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for Determining the Association of Proteins with Specific Genomic Sequences In Vivo. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Edited by: Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K. 2005, 21.3.1-21.3.33.Google Scholar
  40. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 6640-5. 10.1073/pnas.120163297.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu JD, Parkinson JS: Genetics and sequence analysis of the pcnB locus, an Escherichia coli gene involved in plasmid copy number control. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 1254-61.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pope NR, Cole JA: Generation of a membrane potential by one of two independent pathways for nitrite reduction by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1982, 128: 319-322.Google Scholar
  43. Silver LE, Clark VL: Construction of a translational lacZ fusion system to study gene regulation in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Gene. 1995, 166: 101-104. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00605-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Macdonald H, Cole JA: Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the cysG and nirB genes of Escherichia coli K-12, two closely linked genes required for NADH-dependent nitrite reductase activity. Mol Gen Genet. 1985, 200: 328-334. 10.1007/BF00425444.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Whitehead et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement