"NeuroStem Chip": a novel highly specialized tool to study neural differentiation pathways in human stem cells
© Anisimov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 21 September 2006
Accepted: 08 February 2007
Published: 08 February 2007
Human stem cells are viewed as a possible source of neurons for a cell-based therapy of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease. Several protocols that generate different types of neurons from human stem cells (hSCs) have been developed. Nevertheless, the cellular mechanisms that underlie the development of neurons in vitro as they are subjected to the specific differentiation protocols are often poorly understood.
We have designed a focused DNA (oligonucleotide-based) large-scale microarray platform (named "NeuroStem Chip") and used it to study gene expression patterns in hSCs as they differentiate into neurons. We have selected genes that are relevant to cells (i) being stem cells, (ii) becoming neurons, and (iii) being neurons. The NeuroStem Chip has over 1,300 pre-selected gene targets and multiple controls spotted in quadruplicates (~46,000 spots total). In this study, we present the NeuroStem Chip in detail and describe the special advantages it offers to the fields of experimental neurology and stem cell biology. To illustrate the utility of NeuroStem Chip platform, we have characterized an undifferentiated population of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells (hESCs, cell line SA02). In addition, we have performed a comparative gene expression analysis of those cells versus a heterogeneous population of hESC-derived cells committed towards neuronal/dopaminergic differentiation pathway by co-culturing with PA6 stromal cells for 16 days and containing a few tyrosine hydroxylase-positive dopaminergic neurons.
We characterized the gene expression profiles of undifferentiated and dopaminergic lineage-committed hESC-derived cells using a highly focused custom microarray platform (NeuroStem Chip) that can become an important research tool in human stem cell biology. We propose that the areas of application for NeuroStem microarray platform could be the following: (i) characterization of the expression of established, pre-selected gene targets in hSC lines, including newly derived ones, (ii) longitudinal quality control for maintained hSC populations, (iii) following gene expression changes during differentiation under defined cell culture conditions, and (iv) confirming the success of differentiation into specific neuronal subtypes.
Modern DNA microarrays permit a comprehensive analysis of quantitative and qualitative changes in RNA transcript abundance, outlining the cross-sections of gene expression and alterations of these in response to genetic or environmental stimuli. Genome-scale microarrays (cDNA- or oligonucleotide-based) are most valuable when screening populations of cells for the novel genes reflecting potential diagnostic and prognostic markers or for an identification of novel therapeutic targets. On the other hand, custom microarray platforms that focus on specific pre-selected subset of genes relevant to a particular field of investigation can be less costly and more suitable for detection of smaller gene expression changes.
Microarray technology has added important information on both normal development and pathological changes in neurons. This is well illustrated by multiple studies on substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons, which degenerate in Parkinson's disease (PD) [1–5]. The shortcomings of pharmacological therapies in PD have stimulated a search for alternative treatment strategies. In successful cases, transplants of human embryonic mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons can both restore dopaminergic neurotransmission and provide some symptomatic relief [6–8]. A wider application of neural transplantation in PD is, however, currently not feasible due to the unpredictable and variable outcome, the risks of unwanted side-effects (dyskinesias) [9, 10] and ethical and practical problems associated with using donor cells obtained from aborted embryos and fetuses [11, 12]. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are considered a promising future source of cells for cell replacement therapy in PD and other neurological conditions . They could constitute a virtually infinite source of self-renewing cells that can be persuaded to differentiate into specific types of neural cells, including dopaminergic neurons [14–16]. The molecular mechanisms that govern development of cultured hESCs into specific types of neural cells are not fully understood. To promote our understanding of such mechanisms, it would be valuable to have tools that readily and reproducibly can help to characterize the cells as they differentiate from pluripotent stem cells into post-mitotic neurons. This important issue was addressed in earlier studies by Luo et al. and Yang et al., who designed small-to-moderate scale custom microarray platforms (281 and 755 gene targets, respectively) [17, 18]. In addition SuperArray Bioscience Corporation (Frederick, MD, USA) have manufactured a range of small-scale arrays (263 gene targets for human array; ). We sought to create an improved and updated microarray platform for hESC/neuronal differentiation-oriented gene expression studies. Therefore, we generated a specialized large-scale DNA microarray platform (the "NeuroStem Chip") that has over 1,300 pre-selected gene targets and multiple controls spotted in quadruplicates (~46,000 spots total). Here we introduce the platform and the advantages it can offers to neuroscientists and stem cell biologists: particularly, in the niche of gene expression-oriented characterization of the samples using an assay of pre-selected, already established gene targets. In the current study, we use the NeuroStem Chip to characterize an undifferentiated population of pluripotent hESCs (cell line SA02, Cellartis AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and compare the gene expression in those cells with that of a hESC-derived cell population rich in neurons, including tyrosine hydroxylase-positive dopaminergic neurons.
Results and Discussion
Stem cells have unique biological characteristics, but only a limited number of genes are currently recognized as established stem cell markers. Examples include POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 (Oct3/4), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor (Tdgf1), Enk-pending (Nanog), undifferentiated embryonic cell transcription factor 1 (Utf1) and DNA methyltransferase 3B (Dnmt3b) . At the same time, hundreds of genes are suggested as candidate markers for "stemness", but their coupling to the undifferentiated stem cell state is not yet fully verified . The concept of "stemness" (term introduced in 1986 by Grossman & Levine) is defined as "core stem cell properties that underlie self-renewal and the ability to generate differentiated progeny" . Considering the complexity of the processes involved, stemness can hardly be ensured by co-operation of just a few genes. Nevertheless, three stemness genes (namely, Oct3/4, Stat3 and Nanog) are considered "master"-genes that control the self-renewing process [23, 24]. Various types of stem cells, such as hematopoietic, mesenchymal and neural (HSCs, MSCs and NSCs, respectively), embryonic germ and embryonic carcinoma cells (EGCs and ECCs, respectively) are all characterized by variations in gene expression profiles, and only a few gene markers are associated with all these cell types [25, 26]. We have aimed to embrace the most comprehensive set of those genes into a solitary array, the NeuroStem Chip. Thereby, it is possible to employ it to monitor the relative expression levels of numerous known and candidate stemness genes in a single experiment.
NeuroStem chip entries related to dopaminergic system.
Aadc, Ant2 (Slc25a5), Calb1, Dat (Slc6a3), Girk2 (Kcnj6), Igf1, Ptx3, Th
Markers of dopaminergic neurons
En1, En2, Lmx1bb, Pax5, Shh, Wnt1
Markers of dopaminergic progenitors
Adh2, Lhx1 (Lim1), Lhx5 (Lim2)
Markers of dopaminergic progenitors maturation
Markers of mature dopaminergic neurons
Gfra1, Gfra2, Gfra3, Gfra4, Otx2
Markers of early dopaminergic neurons
Dlx1, Dlx2, Flj38973, Lmx1a
Related to differentiation of dopaminergic neurons
Adcy7, Alcam, Art (Artn), Bcl11a, Calca, Cart, Cbln1, Cdh2, Col11a1, Cx43, D1lip (Drd1ip), Darpp32 (Ppp1r1b), Dbh, Doc2a, Drd1, Drd3, Drd4, Drd5, Drip78 (Dnajc14), Egln3 (Phd3), Egr1, Fos, Fxyd6, Galm, Ghr, Grin2c, Grp, Gsbs (C7orf16), Hs6st2, Igfbp4, Kcna5, Kcnab1, Math2, Mlp (Marcksl1), Moxd1, Mpp3, Nrip3, Nrp2, Nt (Nts), Ntn (Nrtn), Nurr1 (Nr4a2), Pac1 (Adcyap1r1), Pacap, Plagl1 (Zac), Pvrl3 (Nectin 3), Rab3c, Rcn1, Slc17a6 (Vglut2), Slc6a1, Sox6, Spp1, Tacr3, Trhr, Zfp161, Vav3, Zdhhc2
Related to dopaminergic system
Selected categories of NeuroStem chip entries.
Recognized markers of stemness
Oct3/4, Nanog, Tdgf1
Candidate markers of stemness
Cpxm1, Hook1, Ddx21
Germ cell markers
Rif1, Bnc1, Bnc2
Hematopoietic stem cell markers
Hoxb4, Cdcp1, C1qr1
Mesenchymal stem cell marker
Bmpr1a, Bmpr2, Cd49a
Ki67, Pcna, Myc
Neural proliferation markers
Lifr, Ebaf, Lyar
Ren, Rai1, Neurod2
Dlx1, Dlx2, Lmx1a
Mecp2, Ebf3, Sox4
Neuronal process formation
Axonal elongation and branching
Pi3, Map1b, Slit1
IV. Neural markers
Gap43, Nfh, Eno2
Markers of dopaminergic neurons
Th, Aadc, Dat
Markers of cholinergic neurons
Markers of spinal neurons
Mag, Mobp, Omg
V. Distinct markers
Gata6, G6pd, Fabp1
Tff3, Sst, Pax4
Itga7, Dmd, Tnnt3
Nkx2.5, Anf, Myhca
Actg2, Cnn1, Sm22α
Flt1, Vwf, Pecam1
Blood cell subtypes
Cd4, Cd8, Cd19
Ptp4a, Atf5, p21snft
VI. Relevant groups
p53, Psip1, Birc2
Tert, Terf2, Rap1
Sod1, Sod2, Gpx1
Tseb3, Gnas1, Grb10
Fzd1, Fzd3, Sfrp1
Wnt1, Wnt7a, Wisp1
Bmp1, Bmp2, Bambi
Stat1, Stat3, Pias1
Fgf1, Fgf2, Fgfr4
Gdf2, Gdf3, Gdf9
Casp1, Casp2, Hsp70
Ccna1, Ccnc, Cdk1
Klf2, Klf9, Znf184
Pearson correlation coefficients of assay comparisons.
hES (Cy3) : Ref (Cy5), 10:5 pmol
hES (Cy5) : Ref (Cy3), 10:5 pmol
hES (Cy3) : Ref (Cy5), 20:10 pmol
hES (Cy3) : Ref (Cy5), 10:5 pmol
hES (Cy5) : Ref (Cy3), 10:5 pmol
hES (Cy3) : Ref (Cy5), 20:10 pmol
hES (Cy5) : Ref (Cy3), 20:10 pmol
Top 25 genes up-regulated in hESC population, as compared to human universal reference RNA.
Homeo box expressed in ES cells 1
Gremlin 1 homolog, cysteine knot superfamily
Cadherin 6 (K-cadherin)
Gap junction protein, α1 (connexin 43)
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2B
Empty spiracles homolog 2 (Drosophila)
Frizzled homolog 7 (Drosophila)
Kallmann syndrome 1 sequence
Autism susceptibility candidate 2
Zic family member 3 heterotaxy 1
Retinal degeneration, slow
DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4-like
Cysteine-rich secretory protein LCCL domain containing 1 (LOC83690)
Leucine rich repeat neuronal 1
G protein-coupled receptor 23
Hypothetical protein MGC16186
Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 3
Cat eye syndrome critical region protein 2
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2
Kallikrein B, plasma (Fletcher factor) 1
Calbindin 1, 28kDa
Inhibitor of DNA binding 4
Embryonic stem cell marker genes expressed in hES SA02 cell line, as detected by the NeuroStem Chip analysis
Homeo box expressed in ES cells 1
Gremlin 1 homolog, cysteine knot superfamily
Gap junction protein, α1 (connexin 43)
Zic family member 3 heterotaxy 1
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3β
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1
Developmental pluripotency associated 4
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2
Forkhead box O1A (rhabdomyosarcoma)
High-mobility group box 1
C-terminal binding protein 2
Lin-28 homolog (C. elegans)
Undifferentiated embryonic cell transcription factor
Left-right determination factor 1
Notably, comparison of expression profiles of undifferentiated hESCs and hESC-derived cells committed toward dopaminergic differentiation pathway by co-culturing with SDIA for 16 days have revealed that many of the stem cell marker genes mentioned above were down-regulated in differentiation (Table 5). Expectedly, Hesx1, Grem1, Dnmt3b, Utf1 and Nanog could be listed among these. At the same time, numerous other genes, including Pitx2, Dlk1 and Msx1 were up-regulated in the latter sample ([see Additional file 2], Figure 3). Table 1 lists 24 dopaminergic system-related entries (e.g., Ptx3, Th, Lhx1) with gene expression up-regulated by Day 16 of hESC differentiation protocol; few more genes have demonstrated less prominent up-regulation (Log2 ratio values in the range of 0.7/0.97–1.0). The gene expression profiles generated are therefore consistent with the results of earlier studies utilizing hSC-derived samples with similar characteristics [43, 44]. Diversity of NeuroStem Chip entries responsive to hESC commitment toward neuronal/dopaminergic differentiation pathway clearly illustrates the complexity of that pathway. The cell population obtained after 16 day exposure to SDIA is highly heterogeneous. Only around 0.2% of the cells are TH-positive cells (Figure 2). This heterogeneity, with an apparent presence of residual pluripotent cells explains the presence of stem cell marker genes, including homeobox transcription factor Nanog, as revealed by RT-PCR data (Figure 3). It would be therefore impossible to apply the platform to identify novel genes associated with the process of differentiation; for that application, the genome-scale microarray platforms (e.g., Affymetrix) are clearly superior. Nevertheless, being based upon a moderate assay of pre-selected specific gene targets, the comparative analysis of microarray data derived from undifferentiated and dopaminergic differentiate pathway-committed hESCs provides a valuable cross-cut of complex relationship between factors driving or indicative to neuronal/dopaminergic differentiation [see Additional file 2].
RT-PCR analyses have validated the overall reliability of NeuroStem microarray platform: all of the entries detected in the hybridization experiments have demonstrated similar trends when analyzed by RT-PCR means (Figure 3). Those entries include Sox2, En1 and Nanog (ratio of differentiated/undifferentiated hESC sample normalized spot intensity < 0.75, down-regulated), Gadph, Aldh1a1, Sdha, Tubb and Nestin (ratio .1.0, unchanged), Actb, Th, Msx1 and Pitx2 (ratio >1.25, up-regulated). Some of the housekeeping genes (Gapdh, Sdha, Tubb, Actb) have somewhat different expression in undifferentiated vs. differentiated cells, consistent with previous reports on certain established housekeeping genes (including Gapdh) being variable in human samples . Importantly, all the observed gene expression trends were similar in both microarray and RT-PCR. Our experiment therefore confirms that the NeuroStem Chip microarray platform can still identify gene expression changes related to early stages of differentiation of hESC into dopaminergic neurons.
Recent technological advances have led to DNA microarrays which contain over hundred thousand of spots of DNA material, reaching a truly genomic scale. Highly specialized DNA microarrays of smaller scale (e.g. the NeuroStem Chip) still have an important role in the directed studies in particular fields. Since they are significantly less expensive, compared to many recognized large-scale platforms (e.g. Affymetrix Human Genome platforms), they have a clear advantage in routine work involving samples from, e.g., multiple cell culture conditions. While there is a risk that one will miss out on changes in genes previously not believed to be relevant to neural differentiation, the restricted number of genes in the NeuroStem Chip also simplifies analysis and adds power. NeuroStem Chip is comparable to other stem cell-related focused microarray platforms in regards to manufacturing costs and technical simplicity of the recommended hybridization protocols. At the same time, it currently implies an advantage in both the scale and the spectrum of pre-selected, specific gene targets assayed. Some suggested areas of application for NeuroStem microarray platform could be the following: (i) characterization of the expression of established, pre-selected gene targets in human stem cell (hSC) lines, including newly derived ones, (ii) longitudinal quality control for maintained hSC populations, (iii) following gene expression changes during differentiation under defined cell culture conditions, and (iv) confirming the success of differentiation into specific neuronal subtypes. In addition, the NeuroStem Chip can be used to characterize gene changes in intracerebral grafts of human cells, even when they are transplanted into experimental animals.
We specifically wish to stress that we are about to make the NeuroStem Chip available at a non-profit cost to the research community. We believe it has the potential to become an important screening tool in the expanding field of hSC studies in application to neurological/neurodegenerative disorders.
Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) cultures
Undifferentiated hESCs of SA02 (Sahlgrenska 2) line (Cellartis AB, Göteborg, Sweden; see NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry at ) were maintained over a monolayer of human "feeder cells" (hFCs; human foreskin fibroblasts, ATCC; cell line CCD-1112Sk). Feeder cells were grown in hFC medium (Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Stem Cell Technologies, USA) and 0.5% Penicillin/Streptomycin mix) for 11 passages. One day prior to hESC plating, hFC medium was washed away from the hFCs, the latter were resuspended in a hESC proliferation medium (VitroHES media (Vitrolife AB, Sweden) supplemented with 4 ng/ml human recombinant basic FGF (hrbFGF, Biosource International, USA) and plated in a central ring of gelatinized in vitro fertilization (IVF) dishes with a cell density of 120,000 cells/dish. The outer rings of the IVF dishes were filled with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 0.5% Penicillin/Streptomycin mix. One half of the culture medium was replaced every other day. The cells were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity settings. Every 6 days, fragments of the hESC colonies (around 10–14 colonies per dish, measuring around 0.015 × 0.015 mm) that had an unaltered morphology (indicating lack of spontaneous differentiation) were mechanically cut from dishes using stem cell knives/transfer pipettes (SweMed Lab International AB, Sweden) and then plated on fresh hFCs.
Commitment of hESCs towards neuronal/dopaminergic differentiation pathway
Co-culturing with the PA6 stromal cell line (MC3T3-G2/Pa6, from RIKEN Cell Bank Japan (RCB 1127), derived from newborn mouse calvaria rapidly generates high numbers of DA neurons from mouse and monkey ESCs by an unknown mechanism named stromal-derived inducing activity (SDIA; [28, 29]). For differentiation experiments, PA6 cells were plated on gelatine-coated T25 flasks at 16 × 103 cells/cm2 (400,000 cells/flask) density 2 days prior to introducing hESCs into the co-culture and cultured at PA6 culturing media (containing minimum essential medium alpha (α-MEM) supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.5% Penicillin/Streptomycin). Alternatively, PA6 cells were plated over Type I collagen-coated glass cover-slips placed in wells of 4-well-plates (50,000 cells/well, for immunocytochemical (ICC) analysis). Three hours prior to initiation of co-culture, PA6 cells were rinsed 3 times with PBS and media was replaced with co-culture media (Glasgow's modified Eagle's media (G-MEM) supplemented with 8% knock-out serum replacement (KSR), 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino-acids (NEAA), 1 mM pyruvate, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (βME) and 4 ng/μl bFGF). Fragments of hESC colonies (80–90 per flask; 4–5 per well of 4-well-plate) presenting undifferentiated morphology were manually passaged onto the confluent PA6 monolayer and cell co-cultures were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2, 95% humidity settings. One half of the co-culture medium was replaced every other day for first 10 days, and daily onwards.
Characterization of hESCs and hESC-derived cells by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and RT-PCR
IVF dishes with hESCs grown atop hFCs and 4-well plate dishes with hESCs growing atop PA6 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 minutes at the day of passage/harvest (Day 6 of hESC/hFC co-culturing) and Day 16 of co-culturing with PA6 cells, respectively. Cells were pre-incubated with blocking solution containing PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 5% of donkey serum. They were then incubated with primary antibodies in blocking solution overnight at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, cells were incubated with the donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with FITC or anti-mouse Cy3 (1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Cells were then washed once with PBS, incubated with 1:1000 DAPI in PBS for 10 minutes, followed by another wash with PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto glass slides with PVA mounting medium containing anti-fading reagent DABCO. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Oct3/4 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.); rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:200, Novocastra Ltd.); rabbit anti-TH (1:500, Chemicon). Immunostained cell cultures were visualized using a Zeiss fluorescent microscope attached to a Nikon digital camera.
Using RT-PCR, all RNA samples used in this study were tested negative for the presence of gDNA (data not shown). The intron-spanning primers for RT-PCR were selected from published works or designed using Oligo 4.0 software (Molecular Biology Insight) or Clone Manager Suite 7.1 (Sci Ed Software, NC, USA) and ordered from TAG Copenhagen A/S, Denmark, as the following: Sox2, SRY-box 2: 5'-TAC CTC TTC CTC CC CTC CA-3', 5'-ACT CTC CTC TTT TGC ACC CC-3'; En1, Engrailed 1: 5'-AAG GGA CGA AAC TGC GAA CTC C-3', 5'-GAC ACG AAA GGA AAC ACA CAC TCT CG-3' ; Nanog: 5'-TGC TTA TTC AGG ACA GCC T-3', 5'-TCT GGT CTT CTG TTT CTT GAC T-3' ; Gapdh, glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: 5'-GGA AGG TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA A-3', 5'-GAT CTC GCT CCT GGA AGA TGG T-3'; Aldh1A1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1: 5'-GGG CAG CCA TTT CTT CTC AC-3', 5'-CTT CTT AGC CCG CTC AAC AC-3' ; Sdha, succinate dehydrogenase: 5'-TGG GAA CAA GAG GGC ATC TG-3', 5'-CCA CCA CTG CAT CAA ATT CAT G-3' ; Tubb, β-tubulin: 5'-CTC ACA AGT ACG TGC CTC GAG-3', 5'-GCA CGA CGC TGA AGG TGT TCA-3'; Nestin: 5'-AGA GGG GAA TTC CTG CT GAG-3', 5'-CTG AGG ACC AGG ACT CTC TA-3' ; Actb, β-actin: 5'-CAT CGA GCA CGG CAT CGT CA-3', 5'-TAG CAC AGC CTG GAT AGC AAC-3' ; Th, Tyrosine hydroxylase: 5'-CGA GCT GTG AAG GTG TTT G-3', 5'-TTG GTG ACC AGG TGA TGA C-3'; Msx1, homolog of Drosophila muscle segment homolog 1: 5'-CTC AAG CTG CCA GAA GAT GC-3', 5'-TCC AGC TCT GCC TCT TGT AG-3'; Pitx2, paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2: 5'-ACC TTA CGG AAG CCC GAG TC-3', 5'-TGG ATA GGG AGG CGG ATG TA-3' . cDNA was synthesized from 1 mg of total RNA using SuperScript II (Invitrogen), and RT-PCR amplifications were performed using the MiniOpticon system (Bio-Rad) with REDTaq Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) essentially as described by the manufacturer. Following initial denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, DNA amplifications were performed for 35 (En1, Nanog, Aldh1a1), 33 (Sox2, Nestin, Th, Msx1), 32 (Tubb, Pitx2), 27 (Sdha), 25 (Actb) or 22 (Gapdh) cycles of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 55°C (En1, Pitx2), 57°C (Sox2, Nanog, Sdha, Nestin), 58°C (Tubb), 58.5°C (Aldh1a1, Th) or 59°C (Gapdh, Actb, Msx1), and 1 min at 72°C. The final extension was 5 min at 72°C. Twenty μl volumes of RT-PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis at 1% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
RNA purification and fluorescent dye incorporationFor RNA purification of undifferentiated hESCs, the latter were mechanically separated from hFCs, collected in a 500 μl volume of VitroHES media, rinsed in PBS buffer and spun down at 300 rcf for 5 min. hESC-derived cells grown atop PA6 cells were harvested using a papain dissociation kit (Worthington Biochemical Corporation), rinsed in PBS buffer and spun down as described above. The resulting cell pellets were resuspended in RLT buffer (Qiagen, USA), passed through the shredder column (Qiagen) and stored at -80°C until the RNA sample was purified following the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) protocol (without carrier RNA); with DNase I (Quiagen) treatment incorporated to the latter. RNA integrity was tested using both ND-1000 specrophotometer (NanoDrop, USA) and RNA Nano LabChip/2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, USA).
Fluorescent label (24 nmol of the Cyanine 3-CTP (Cy3); PerkinElmer, USA) was incorporated to 350–500 ng of total RNA amplified using Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent Technologies), generally following the kit manufacturer's protocol. Similarly, 24 nmols of the Cyanine 5-CTP (Cy5; PerkinElmer) fluorescent label were incorporated to 400 ng sample of Human Universal Reference RNA (Stratagene, USA); in addition, dye-swap replicate amplification were performed. Amplified fluorescent cRNA samples were purified using RNeasy mini-columns (Quiagen), and fluorescence of the eluted products was measured using ND-1000 specrophotometer (NanoDrop).
Long oligonucleotide probes (69–71 nucleotides) matching gene targets of interest were selected from Operon V2 and V3 human AROS sets (Operon Biotechnologies Inc., USA). Arrays were produced by the SweGene DNA Microarray Resource Centre, Department of Oncology at Lund University (Sweden) using a MicroGrid II 600R arrayer fitted with MicroSpot 10 K pins (Harvard BioRobotics, USA). Printing was performed in a temperature- (18–20°C) and humidity- (44–49% RH) controlled area on Corning UltraGAPS aminosilane slides (Corning Inc., USA) with 140 μm spot-to-spot centerdistance and 90–110 μm average spot size. Following printing, arrays were dried for 48 hours andstored in a dessicator until used. Microarray slides were UV-cross-linked (800 mJ/cm2), pre-hybridizedwith fluorescently labeled samples using the Pronto! Universal Microarray Hybridization Kit (Corning) and subsequently hybridized with test (Cy3-labeled)/reference (Cy5-labeled) RNA samples (or in reverse dye-labeling order) at 42°C for 17 h using a MAUI hybridization station (BioMicro Systems Inc., USA) and the Pronto! Universal Microarray Hybridization Kit, generally following manufacturer's instructions, with several minor adaptations .
Data acquisition and statistical analysis
Immediately following the washing steps, the fluorescence intensities were measured using a confocal laser scanner (G2505B, Agilent Technologies). After image formatting by Tiff Image Channel Splitter Utility (Agilent Technologies) and grid annotation, a complete set of spots was visually inspected for each slide. Using GenePix Pro (Molecular Devices Corp. USA) flags for artifactual spots were annotated for each spot. Median pixel intensity minus the median local background for both dyes was used to obtain a test over reference intensity ratio. Data normalization was performed per array subgrid using LOWESS curve fitting with a smoothing factor of 0.33 [52, 53]. All normalizations, filtering, merging of technical replicates and analyses were performed in the BioArray Software Environment database . To visualize sample-dependent variation of spot intensities, data was uploaded to the TIGR MultiExperiment Viewer (MEV; ).
We acknowledge the supports from the Unites States Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USA MRAA, Award No. W81XWH-04-1-0366), National Institute of Health (Grant Number 1 R21 NS043717-01A1), the Swedish Research Council, Crafoordska Foundation and the Swedish Parkinson Foundation. S.V.A. is supported by Marie Curie Incoming Fellowship (MIF1-CT-2005-008445); N.S.C is supported by a grant from the Danish Academy of Technical Sciences; A.S.C. is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia from the Portuguese government (Reference Number SFRH/BD/11804/2003). Authors are most thankful to SweGene DNA Microarray Resource Centre, Department of Oncology at Lund University (Sweden), namely Professor Åke Borg, Johan Staaf and Eleonor Olsson for technical expertise and assistance with all aspects of NeuroStem manufacturing and applications; and to Dr. Tomas Deierborg (Neuronal Survival Unit) for his kind assistance with fluorescent microscopy imaging.
- Ahn JI, Lee KH, Shin DM, Shim JW, Lee JS, Chang SY, Lee YS, Brownstein MJ, Lee SH, Lee YS: Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of differentiation of embryonic stem cells into midbrain and hindbrain neurons. Dev Biol. 2004, 265: 491-501. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.041.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grimm J, Mueller A, Hefti F, Rosenthal A: Molecular basis for catecholaminergic neuron diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 13891-13896. 10.1073/pnas.0405340101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thuret S, Bhatt L, O'Leary DD, Simon HH: Identification and developmental analysis of genes expressed by dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004, 25: 394-405. 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.11.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung CY, Seo H, Sonntag KC, Brooks A, Lin L, Isacson O: Cell type-specific gene expression of midbrain dopaminergic neurons reveals molecules involved in their vulnerability and protection. Hum Mol Genet. 2005, 14: 1709-1725. 10.1093/hmg/ddi178.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greene JG, Dingledine R, Greenamyre JT: Gene expression profiling of rat midbrain dopamine neurons: implications for selective vulnerability in parkinsonism. Neurobiol Dis. 2005, 18: 19-31. 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.10.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piccini P, Brooks DJ, Bjorklund A, Gunn RN, Grasby PM, Rimoldi O, Brundin P, Hagell P, Rehncrona S, Widner H, Lindvall O: Dopamine release from nigral transplants visualized in vivo in a Parkinson's patient. Nat Neurosci. 1999, 2: 1137-1140. 10.1038/16060.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindvall O, Hagell P: Clinical observations after neural transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Prog Brain Res. 2000, 127: 299-320.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polgar S, Morris ME, Reilly S, Bilney B, Sanberg PR: Reconstructive neurosurgery for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis. Brain Res Bull. 2003, 60: 1-24. 10.1016/S0361-9230(03)00017-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freed CR, Greene PE, Breze RE, Tsai WY, DuMouchel W, Kao R, Dillon S, Winfield H, Culver S, Trojanowski JQ, Eidelberg D, Fahn S: Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 710-719. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olanow CW, Goetz CG, Kordower JH, Stoessl AJ, Sossi V, Brin MF, Shannon KM, Nauert GM, Perl DP, Godbold J, Freeman TB: A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2003, 54: 403-414. 10.1002/ana.10720.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roybon L, Christophersen NS, Brundin P, Li JY: Stem cell therapy for Parkinson's disease where do we stand?. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 318: 261-273. 10.1007/s00441-004-0946-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Correia AS, Anisimov SV, Li JY, Brundin P: Stem cell-based therapy for Parkinson's disease. Ann Med. 2005, 37: 487-498. 10.1080/07853890500327967.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindvall O, Kokaia Z, Martinez-Serrano A: Stem cell therapy for human neurodegenerative disorders-how to make it work. Nat Med. 2004, S42-50. 10.1038/nm1064. Suppl
- Ben-Hur T: Human embryonic stem cell therapy for Parkinson's disease. Future Neurol. 2006, 1: 227-236. 10.2217/14796708.1.2.227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park CH, Minn YK, Lee JY, Choi DH, Chang MY, Shim JW, Ko JY, Koh HC, Kang MJ, Kang JS, Rhie DJ, Lee YS, Son H, Moon SY, Kim KS, Lee SH: In vitro and in vivo analyses of human embryonic stem cell-derived dopamine neurons. J Neurochem. 2005, 92: 1265-1276. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.03006.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perrier AL, Tabar V, Barberi T, Rubio ME, Bruses J, Topf N, Harrison NL, Studer L: Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 12543-12548. 10.1073/pnas.0404700101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo Y, Schwartz C, Shin S, Zeng X, Chen N, Wang Y, Yu X, Rao MS: A focused microarray to assess dopaminergic and glial cell differentiation from fetal tissue or embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 865-875. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0392.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang AX, Mejido J, Luo Y, Zeng X, Schwartz C, Wu T, Thies RS, Bhattacharya B, Han J, Freed B, Rao M, Puri RK: Development of a focused microarray to assess human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2005, 14: 270-284. 10.1089/scd.2005.14.270.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- SuperArray Bioscience Corporation, Stem Cell andDevelopment Arrays. [http://superarray.com/ArrayList.php?application=STEMCE]
- Bhattacharya B, Miura T, Brandenberger R, Mejido J, Luo Y, Yang AX, Joshi BH, Ginis I, Thies RS, Amit M, Lyons I, Condie BG, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rao MS, Puri RK: Gene expression in human embryonic stem cell lines: unique molecular signature. Blood. 2004, 103: 2956-2964. 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3314.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cai J, Weiss ML, Rao MS: In search of "stemness". Exp Hematol. 2004, 32: 585-598. 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.03.013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grossman Z, Levine RF: A non-programmatic approach to hemopoiesis. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986, 215: 51-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, Smith A: Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2003, 113: 643-655. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00392-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Maruyama M, Maeda M, Yamanaka S: The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell. 2003, 113: 631-642. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00393-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anisimov SV, Tarasov KV, Riordon D, Wobus AM, Boheler KR: SAGE identification of differentiation responsive genes in P19 embryonic cells induced to form cardiomyocytes in vitro. Mech Dev. 2002, 117: 25-74. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00177-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anisimov SV, Tarasov KV, Tweedie D, Stern MD, Wobus AM, Boheler KR: SAGE identification of gene transcripts with abundances unique to pluripotent mouse R1 embryonic stem cells. Genomics. 2002, 79: 169-176. 10.1006/geno.2002.6687.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heins N, Englund MC, Sjoblom C, Dahl U, Tonning A, Bergh C, Lindahl A, Hanson C, Semb H: Derivation, characterization, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 367-376. 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-367.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki H, Mizuseki K, Nishikawa S, Kaneko S, Kuwana Y, Nakanishi S, Nishikawa SI, Sasai Y: Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from ES cells by stromal cell-derived inducing activity. Neuron. 2000, 28: 31-40. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00083-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki H, Suemori H, Mizuseki K, Watanabe K, Urano F, Ichinose H, Haruta M, Takahashi M, Yoshikawa K, Nishikawa S, Nakatsuji N, Sasai Y: Generation of dopaminergic neurons and pigmented epithelia from primate ES cells by stromal cell-derived inducing activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 1580-1585. 10.1073/pnas.032662199.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Novoradovskaya N, Whitfield ML, Basehore LS, Novoradovsky A, Pesich R, Usary J, Karaca M, Wong WK, Aprelikova O, Fero M, Perou CM, Botstein D, Braman J: Universal Reference RNA as a standard for microarray experiments. BMC Genomics. 2004, 5: 20-10.1186/1471-2164-5-20.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anisimov SV: Application of DNA microarray technology to gerontological studies. Meth Mol Biol.
- Saal LH, Troein C, Vallon-Christersson J, Gruvberger S, Borg A, Peterson C: BioArray Software Environment (BASE): a platform for comprehensive management and analysis of microarray data. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: software0003.1-0003.6. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-8-software0003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang IV, Chen E, Hasseman JP, Liang W, Frank BC, Wang S, Sharov V, Saeed AI, White J, Li J, Lee NH, Yeatman TJ, Quackenbush J: Within the fold: assessing differential expression measures and reproducibility in microarray assays. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: research0062.1-0062.12. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-11-research0062.Google Scholar
- TIGR, The Institute for Genomic Research. [http://www.tigr.org]
- Thomas PQ, Johnson BV, Rathjen J, Rathjen PD: Sequence, genomic organization, and expression of the novel homeobox gene Hesx1. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 3869-3875. 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3869.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Webb GC, Thomas PQ, Ford JH, Rathjen PD: Hesx1, a homeobox gene expressed by murine embryonic stem cells, maps to mouse chromosome 14, bands A3-B. Genomics. 1993, 18: 464-466. 10.1006/geno.1993.1505.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katoh Y, Katoh M: Comparative genomics on BMP4 orthologs. Int J Oncol. 2005, 27: 581-585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dvorak P, Dvorakova D, Koskova S, Vodinska M, Najvirtova M, Krekac D, Hampl A: Expression and potential role of fibroblast growth factor 2 and its receptors in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1200-1211. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mummery CL, van Rooyen M, Bracke M, van den Eijnden-van Raaij J, van Zoelen EJ, Alitalo K: Fibroblast growth factor-mediated growth regulation and receptor expression in embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells and human germ cell tumours. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993, 191: 188-195. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1201.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levenstein ME, Ludwig TE, Xu RH, Llanas RA, VanDenHeuvel-Kramer K, Manning D, Thomson JA: Basic fibroblast growth factor support of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 568-574. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0247.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skotheim RI, Lind GE, Monni O, Nesland JM, Abeler VM, Fossa SD, Duale N, Brunborg G, Kallioniemi O, Andrews PW, Lothe RA: Differentiation of human embryonal carcinomas in vitro and in vivo reveals expression profiles relevant to normal development. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 5588-5598. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stratagene Universal Reference RNAs. [http://stratagene.com/products/displayProduct.aspx?pid=439]
- Zeng X, Cai J, Chen J, Luo Y, You ZB, Fotter E, Wang Y, Harvey B, Miura T, Backman C, Chen GJ, Rao MS, Freed WJ: Dopaminergic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 925-940. 10.1634/stemcells.22-6-925.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz CM, Spivak CE, Baker SC, McDaniel TK, Loring JF, Nguyen C, Chrest FJ, Wersto R, Arenas E, Zeng X, Freed WJ, Rao MS: NTera2: a model system to study dopaminergic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2005, 14: 517-534. 10.1089/scd.2005.14.517.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barber RD, Harmer DW, Coleman RA, Clark BJ: GAPDH as a housekeeping gene: analysis of GAPDH mRNA expression in a panel of 72 human tissues. Physiol Genomics. 2005, 21: 389-395. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00025.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health Stem Cell Information resource, Provider: Cellartis AB. [http://stemcells.nih.gov/research/registry/cellartis.asp]
- Hori Y, Gu X, Xie X, Kim SK: Differentiation of insulin-producing cells from human neural progenitor cells. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e103-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020103.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu H, Fang D, Kumar SM, Li L, Nguyen TK, Acs G, Herlyn M, Xu X: Isolation of a novel population of multipotent adult stem cells from human hair follicles. Am J Pathol. 2006, 168: 1879-1888. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051170.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jorgensen JR, Juliusson B, Henriksen KF, Hansen C, Knudsen S, Petersen TN, Blom N, Seiger A, Wahlberg LU: Identification of novel genes regulated in the developing human ventral mesencephalon. Exp Neurol. 2006, 198: 427-437. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.12.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: research0034-10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Ding L, Sandford AJ: Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in human neutrophils by real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol. 2005, 6: 4-10.1186/1471-2199-6-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ: Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988, 83: 596-610. 10.2307/2289282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP: Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: e15-10.1093/nar/30.4.e15.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.