Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage of heterozygous loci, for each citrus genotype (diagonally bold characters); percentage of monomorphic heterozygous loci between each pair of genotype (italic characters in the upper right size of the table) and percentage of polymorphic heterozygous loci between two genotypes (normal characters in the left down part of the table).

From: Transferability of the EST-SSRs developed on Nules clementine (Citrus clementina Hort ex Tan) to other Citrus species and their effectiveness for genetic mapping

IN*

Varieties

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1

Clementine

36

20

3

18

11

9

0

0

3

6

0

0

0

0

3

2

Valencia late sweet orange

3

40

6

15

11

12

0

0

3

6

0

3

0

0

3

3

Cleopatra mandarin

11

3

24

6

3

0

0

0

3

3

0

0

0

0

3

4

Willow leaf mandarin

9

3

12

43

9

9

0

0

3

3

0

3

0

0

3

5

Morocco sour orange

20

23

11

15

45

3

0

0

3

6

0

3

0

0

3

6

Marsh grapefruit

12

18

12

12

29

43

0

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

7

Corsican citron

6

3

3

3

3

3

8

3

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

8

Mexican lime

24

21

15

24

24

18

3

41

9

6

3

3

3

0

0

9

Brazil sweet lime

20

17

11

24

23

21

3

24

58

21

6

6

6

0

6

10

Lisbon lemon

21

15

15

24

24

21

3

24

21

49

9

3

0

3

6

11

Sans pepins pummelo

15

15

12

15

18

12

3

15

18

9

32

0

0

0

0

12

Pink pummelo

6

9

9

9

6

12

3

12

12

9

12

27

0

0

0

13

Kindia combava

21

21

15

21

24

18

6

21

24

21

21

9

43

0

0

14

Pomeroy trifoliate orange

11

17

9

12

17

18

3

18

20

9

15

12

21

29

0

15

Marumi kumquat

11

11

11

9

17

15

3

12

11

9

12

6

15

17

34

  1. * Identification number