RNomics and Modomics in the halophilic archaea Haloferax volcanii: identification of RNA modification genes
© Grosjean et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 01 July 2008
Accepted: 09 October 2008
Published: 09 October 2008
Naturally occurring RNAs contain numerous enzymatically altered nucleosides. Differences in RNA populations (RNomics) and pattern of RNA modifications (Modomics) depends on the organism analyzed and are two of the criteria that distinguish the three kingdoms of life. If the genomic sequences of the RNA molecules can be derived from whole genome sequence information, the modification profile cannot and requires or direct sequencing of the RNAs or predictive methods base on the presence or absence of the modifications genes.
By employing a comparative genomics approach, we predicted almost all of the genes coding for the t+rRNA modification enzymes in the mesophilic moderate halophile Haloferax volcanii. These encode both guide RNAs and enzymes. Some are orthologous to previously identified genes in Archaea, Bacteria or in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but several are original predictions.
The number of modifications in t+rRNAs in the halophilic archaeon is surprisingly low when compared with other Archaea or Bacteria, particularly the hyperthermophilic organisms. This may result from the specific lifestyle of halophiles that require high intracellular salt concentration for survival. This salt content could allow RNA to maintain its functional structural integrity with fewer modifications. We predict that the few modifications present must be particularly important for decoding, accuracy of translation or are modifications that cannot be functionally replaced by the electrostatic interactions provided by the surrounding salt-ions. This analysis also guides future experimental validation work aiming to complete the understanding of the function of RNA modifications in Archaeal translation.
Post-transcriptional modification of transfer and ribosomal RNAs is essential for their cellular activities as core molecules of the translation apparatus. To date, the chemical structure of more than one hundred RNA modifications have been identified in all domains of life [1–3]. In transfer RNAs, modified nucleotides are found predominantly within the 3D-core of molecules and in the anticodon arm, especially at the wobble position 34 and at position 37, 3' adjacent to the anticodon (conventional numbering of tRNA positions is as defined in , http://www.tRNA.uni-bayreuth.de). These particular modifications allow the molecules to adopt the canonical L-shaped conformation and modulate interactions with various interacting macromolecules such as aminoacyl:tRNA-synthetases, initiation, elongation and termination factors, mRNA and/or elements of the decoding and peptidyl-centers of the ribosome (reviewed in [5–10]). In ribosomal RNAs, modified nucleotides are located mostly in regions corresponding to the functional centers of the ribosome [11–14]. Their location suggests a role in accuracy and efficiency of translation, however the specific function of each modified nucleoside is still largely unknown. This lack of knowledge stems from peculiarities of the rRNA molecule itself: it is a large molecule (molecular mass between 1.5 to 3.9 MDa); some nucleotides are only partially modified and their function(s) are most certainly dependent on a network of synergistic interactions with different elements of the ribosome, including other modified nucleosides that may act cooperatively. Nevertheless, function has been attributed to modified nucleosides in rRNA in a few cases [13, 15–22].
Difference in profile and type of RNA modifications (Modomics) is one of the criteria that distinguish the three kingdoms of life. While universal modifications such as Ψ, m5U, t6A or m1G are found in a large numbers of archaeal, bacterial and eukaryal tRNAs, each kingdom has a set of signature modifications. For examples mimG, G+, m22Gm, ac6A or m1Ψ are typical of archaeal tRNAs, while yW, mcm5U and manQ, or k2C, mo5U and m6t6A are typical of tRNAs from Eukarya or Bacteria respectively (for review see Figure 8.1 in ). The same conclusion applies for modified nucleotides in rRNAs (see ; http://people.biochem.umass.edu/fournierlab/snornadb/main.php).
In Archaea, our knowledge of the diversity of RNA modifications is largely founded on the lifework of Jim McCloskey and Pamela Crain, who analyzed bulk tRNA and rRNA preparations from a phylogenetically diverse set of Archaea. The technique used combined separation of nucleosides of bulk RNA RNase hydrolysate by liquid chromatography, followed by comparison of the derived modified nucleosides to synthetic ones by mass spectrometry techniques  (for more recent development of the technique, see  and references therein). However, to date Haloferax volcanii, a Halobacteriaceae that lives optimally at 42°C in the presence of 1.5–2.5 M NaCl , is the only Archaea for which both the chemical identities and positions of almost all modified ribonucleosides have been mapped for nearly the whole set of the 52 sequenced tRNAs with distinct anticodons [28, 29]. In addition, 13 tRNA sequences of two closely related mesophilic halophiles are available, Halobacterium cutirubrum (12 sequences) and Halococcus morrhuae (one sequence) . For H. volcanii ribosomal RNAs, the type and position of modifications are available in the case of the 16S RNA [30, 31], but not for the 23S nor the 5S RNAs. These can be inferred from studies on another closely phylogenetically related halophilic Archaea Haloarcula marismortui [32, 33]. However, while the RNA modifications have been mapped in RNAs of halophiles, including H. volcanii, the identity of the genes that code for the corresponding RNA modification enzymes remains largely ignored.
Using a comparative genomic analysis method, that we have recently applied to the only other organism with an almost complete set of sequenced tRNAs, the pathogenic bacteria Mycoplasma capricolum , we set out to predict all the RNA modification genes in the halophilic archaeaon H. volcanii. Some were easily predicted by homology with experimentally validated RNA modification genes from other organisms, while a few are original predictions based on comparative genomic analysis  (not based on homology). This computation work provides predictions that can now guide the experimental validation work with the goals of elucidating the role of RNA modifications in Archaeal translation, and ultimately obtaining a better understanding of the emergence of this extraordinary complex enzymatic machinery during evolution.
Results and Discussion
Post-transcriptional modification of RNA
Modification pattern of tRNAs
As illustrated in Figure 1B, the modified nucleosides in tRNA can be classified in two categories: those that are present in the 3D-core (gray background) and presumably implicated mostly in the formation and/or the control of flexibility of the L-shaped molecule (reviewed in [9, 36]); and those present in the decoding region (anticodon hairpin), implicated in the efficacy and accuracy of interaction with selected amino-acyl tRNA synthetases (reviewed in ) and the various codons within the mRNA:ribosome complex (reviewed in [5, 8]).
The identification of a modified nucleotide does not imply it is present in a one to one ratio with the RNA molecule. Indeed, the presence and final chemical structure of certain modified nucleotides, particularly the hypermodified ones, may vary according to the physiological constraints of the cell (aerobic/anaerobic conditions, temperature, availability of intermediate metabolites or cofactors of the modification enzymes, various metabolic stress conditions; discussed in: [37–41]). The A-15, C-34, U-52 and U-54 residues in some H. volcanii tRNAs were reported to be only partially modified into G+-15, ac4C-34 (ac for acetyl), Ψ-52 or Ψ-54/m1Ψ-54 respectively, giving rise to distinct iso-tRNA species that sometimes can be separated by liquid chromatography or 2D-gel electrophoresis . When a modification requires multiple modification enzymes like m1Ψ-54, G+-15 and few U-34 derivatives (see below), only intermediate products may exist under certain physiological conditions. However, the genes corresponding to all of the expected modified nucleotides (present or not) in the cellular tRNA population should be present in the genome.
Modification pattern of rRNA
The characteristic pair of tandem dimethylated adenosine (m62A m62A) is universally present at analogous positions in rRNA of all organisms examined so far. These are located at the interface of the two ribosomal subunits [11, 12, 14] and their formation may serve as a checkpoint in quality control of ribosome biogenesis [42–44]. Likewise, acp3U-910 (966) in hairpin 31 appears to be nearly universally modified, although the type of base and corresponding modification vary from one organism to another: m2G 3'-adjacent to a m5C in 16S RNA of both E. coli and Thermotoga maritima , m22G 3'-adjacent to m5C in Thermus thermophilus , m1Ψ-acp3U in Drosophila melanogaster SSU RNA and designated as unknown modified nucleoside in SSU RNA of other organisms, mostly archaeons . This modified nucleotide is above the P-site-bound tRNA and directly contacts the anticodon stem-loop of tRNA at position 34 [47–51], and is also often modified (see Figure 2A and Additional file 1). Several studies indicate this nucleotide is important in decoding genetic information, particularly at the step of initiation [21, 22, 52].
Helix 44 is the dominant structural component of the 30S subunit interface. It's upper end lies just below where the mRNA transverses the subunit in the P site [53, 54]. This portion forms a significant intersubunit bridge while at the same time is directly functionally important for efficient and accurate decoding since two bases, at least in the E. coli ribosome (bases 1492 and 1493) flip out of an internal loop in this region [53, 54]. This allows the monitoring by direct contact of the mRNA-tRNA base pairing in the A site, a conformational transition facilitated by the binding of aminoglycoside antibiotic, e.g. paromomycin, to a pocket in the major grove of the top of helix 44 . Modified nucleoside m6A-1432 (1500 E. coli numbering) at the bottom of helix 44 is present in SSU RNA of most (if not all) Archaea, and only a few Eukarya, but never in Bacteria (for references see ). It is also termed a 'decoding site nt'  because it is present in the functionally significant region of helix 44, adjacent to a critical intersubunit bridge (B2a). Contrary to the others above, the unknown N-330 (C*1352; 1404 E. coli numbering) is found in Archaea and in many Bacteria, but not in Eukarya. While it directly contacts paromomycin bound to helix 44, its function remains an enigma and its chemical structure remains to be elucidated.
Modification pattern of large subunit rRNAs
No data are available for H. volcanii 23S RNA modifications. We therefore used the analysis performed in the closely related organism Haloarcula marismortui [32, 33, 56] that led to the identification of modified nucleotides at eight positions. Their locations in the generalized schematic 2D and 3D-stucture of 23S rRNA are shown in Figures 2C and 2D.
Three Ψ residues are present: two of which, Ψ-1956 and Ψ-1958, are located at universally conserved positions (1915 and 1917; E. coli numbering) in helix 69 loop of domain IV. The helix 69 stem-loop contacts A- and P-site tRNAs, contributes to bridge regions B2a and B2b of 23S rRNA, is involved in translation termination, contacts ribosome recycling factor, plays an active role in dissociation of subunits at the end of translation, and is important for subunit association [17, 33, 49, 57–62]. Specifically, Ψ-1956 (1915) contacts the D stem of tRNA in the A site (positions 11 and 12) and Ψ-1958 (1917) is immediately adjacent to bridge B2a contacts, as well as direct contacts to A-site tRNA; they are important for the conformational flexibility of helix 69 and their loss affects subunit association, dissociation, and translation termination [17, 58–61]. The peptidyl transferase center of the large ribosomal subunit is the rRNA that directly surrounds the active site of peptide bond formation and is made of the rRNA of the central loop and proximal nucleotides of Domain V, as well as the A-loop (loop of hairpin 92) and P-loop (loop of hairpin 80, Figure 2) . The third Ψ is conserved only in eukaryotes and is located at position 2621 (2586 E. coli numbering) between hairpin 90 and 93 in the central loop of domain V, immediately adjacent to rRNA contacts with the P-site tRNA (terminal A of CCA at position 76) [49, 63].
Three 2'-O-ribose methylations were also found: one Gm is located at position 1950 (1909) in the structurally conserved helix 69 of domain IV contacting nucleotide 12 of the tRNA in the P site , while the conserved tandem UmGm, is located at positions 2587/2588 (2552/2553 E. coli numbering) in hairpin 92, also called A-loop or peptidyltransferase loop of domain V, that contacts acceptor end of tRNA in the A-site of the ribosome. In the case of H. marismortui, mutagenesis studies  and X-ray crystallography  demonstrated the existence of base pairing between Gm-2588 (2553) and C-75 of CCA end of tRNA in the A-site of the ribosome, thus implicating a role in the peptidyl transfer reaction.
Lastly, two base methylations (m1A, a modified nucleoside bearing a positive charge and m3U) are present respectively at position 628 (571) in hairpin 25.1 of domain II and at position 2619 (2584) of domain V, between hairpins 90 and 93. The importance of each of these two modified nucleotides (not modified in E. coli) for maintenance of the archaeal ribosome architecture or translation is not known. However, since m3U- 2619 (2584) is in the central loop of Domain V and immediately adjacent to rRNA contacts with P-site tRNA, a fact revealed early on by affinity labeling results showing E. coli 2584 adjacent the CCA end of P-site RNA [65, 66], this suggest a role in peptidyltransferase activity. Moreover, the absence of the U-methylation in the homologous position in H. salinarium 23S rRNA confers resistance to sparsomycin, and antibiotic that normally binds to the peptidyl transferase center .
In domain V of 23S RNA of H. salinarium, an additional Ψ-2606 (2580) at the bottom of helix 90, not present in rRNA of H. marismortui, has been reported . However, as no homolog of the bacterial RluC-type, or the eukaryotic Pus5p-type of enzymes responsible for the formation of this Ψ in the LSU rRNA of respectively E. coli and S. cerevisiae can be found in the genome H. volcanii (see below), its presence in the 23S rRNA of H. volcanii is highly unlikely.
The case of 5S rRNA
As no modifications were detected in the 5S rRNA of the two halophilic archaea H. halobium and H. marismortui [68, 69], we predicted that H. volcanii would also lack modifications in this rRNA. A 2'O-methylcytosine (Cm) at a conserved C-position (position 32) has been reported only in the 5S rRNA of the thermophiles Sulfolobus acidocaldarius  and S. solfataricus , while in the hyperthermophilic Pyrodictium occultum the base at the same location (position 35 in P. occultum) is further acetylated into ac4Cm. Both derivatives ac4C and ac4Cm coexist, indicating incomplete modification of C-35 under the conditions the cells were grown before extraction of the RNA [68, 69]. The same is true for other modified nucleotides in the 16+23 S rRNAs.
A complete inventory of tRNA genes (tRNomics)
The genome of Haloferax volcanii, strain D2 (4,012,900 nt) comprises one chromosome (2,847,757 bp) in several identical copies (up to 20 ) and four smaller plasmids (pHV1:85,092 bp, pHV2:6,359 bp, pHV3:437,906 bp and pHV4:635,786 bp). All tRNA genes are located on the chromosome. This mesophilic halophile exhibits the typical archaeal tRNA set  which is characterized by 46 distinct anticodons able to read all 61 sense codons (see details below). The extra G nucleotide at position 0 of tDNA-His (GTG) is encoded in the genome but none of the CCA 3' terminal sequence of tDNAs are present. The list of tDNA sequences in linear and cloverleaf forms is given in Additional file 2. Remarkably the sequences of each mature tRNA (as sequenced by Gupta [28, 29]) and corresponding tDNAs as identified above perfectly match. The only sequences of mature tRNAs that are missing from Gupta's analysis are those specific for tRNA-Val (anticodon UAC), tRNA-Ser (UGA), tRNA-Thr (UGU), tRNA-Gln (UUG), tRNA-Arg (UCU) and tRNA-Arg (CCU), all but one harboring a T34 wobble base in the corresponding tRNA gene. As stated in the original work , the missing tRNAs probably correspond to minor isoacceptor species that co-migrated with one of the major species and therefore were impossible to isolate and sequence.
Six tRNA genes are present in two copies, raising the total number of tRNA genes from 46 to 52. Among these six pairs, five are perfect duplicates (from positions 1 to 73), while the two tDNA-Gly (GCC) differ by the two base pairs 4–69 and 5–68 (CG and TA versus TA and CG, respectively) as previously noted . Three of these tRNA pairs are organized in direct tandems with a short distance between the two genes: 2 × tDNA-Gly (GCC), 12 nt; 2 × tDNA-Asp (GTC), 29 nt; 2 × tDNA-Val (GAC), 45 nt probably revealing a recent gene duplication. The two tDNA-Ala (TGC) are each embedded in the two copies of the ribosomal operon (between 16S and 23S rRNA genes). Other tDNAs are randomly distributed throughout the genome; the next closest distance between two tDNAs being 96 nt.
As only one gene exists for the majority of tRNAs harboring each a distinct anticodon, large differences must exist either in the expression levels of individual tDNAs, or in the half-life of individual mature tRNAs (or both). Indeed the steady state concentrations within the cell of the major tRNAs (reading most used codons) must be higher than those of minor tRNAs (reading rare codons). The regulation of the expression of the different tDNAs is yet to be elucidated in H. volcanii and in all other Archaea (discussed in ). Its is possible that tRNA stability depends on factors similar to those identified in yeast (reviewed in ).
Only three genes carry introns and in contrast with many other archaea (see ), all are found at the canonical position 37/38. The three genes, tDNA-Met (ATG) (intron of 75 nt), tDNA-Gln (CAA) (intron of 31 nt) and tDNA-Trp (intron of 103 nt), display a nearly perfect hBHBh' motif  with the so-called h helix being the anticodon stem and the so-called h' helix being 3-, 8- and 2-bp long, respectively (see  and Additional file 3). Pre-tRNA-Trp is unique as it contains the C/D and C'/D' boxes that allow methylation of 2' hydroxyl of the ribose at positions 34 and 39 in the intron sequence [74–77] – see also below).
As always in Archaea and Bacteria but not in Eukarya , three different tDNAs bearing the (CAT) anticodon are present: the initiator tDNA-Met (CAT), the elongator tDNA-Met (CAT) and the tDNA-Ile (CAT). In this last case, the final identity of the mature functional tRNA-Ile depends on post-transcriptional modification of C-34 into an as yet unknown modified C-derivative (see below).
Codon decoding strategy
Genes coding for transfer RNA modification enzymes (Modomics)
Predictions of H. volcanii tRNA modifications genes
tRNA (see Additional file 1)
G1-4/R1, D1, Q1, E1-2, H1, P1-3
Homology with P. abyssi PAB1283*
R1, D1, Q1, E1-2, G1-2, H1, Me, Mi, P1-3, S1,T1,V1-2
Homology with E. coli TruD*
R2-3, N1, C1, I2, L1-5, K1-2, Me, Mi, F1, P1, P3, S1-3,T1-2, W1, Y1, V2
Homology with M. jannaschii MJ0436*
Cbf5 without Guide RNA?
A3, R3, L4/A2,R2,I1-2, L1-3,L5,K1-2,S1-3,T1-2, W1
Homology with P. furiosus protein PF1871*
Cbf5 without Guide RNA?
Homology with E. coli protein TrmH*.
aFib +sRNA* 
?mcm 5 s 2 U?
R3, E2, G2, K2, L5
HVO_0574 + HVO_2888 + HVO_0580
2226 1243 0037
cmo 5 U
Prediction this work
HVO_0339 or HVO_0697
1571 or 2047
Q1, E1, K1,P1, S1
Prediction this work
N1,I1-2, K1-2, Me not Mi, S3, T1-2
Homology M. maripaludis protein MMP0186*
R1-3, C1, Q1, E2, H1, L1-5, F1, P1-3, W1, Y1
Homology with M. jannaschii MJ0883*
38 = P1/39 = L2, L4, K1, Me, F1, S1, Y1
Homology with Yeast Pus3* 
aFib + sRNA 
See Additional file 4
39 = L1/40 = I1
Homology with P. abyssi PAB1947* 
Almost all except L4, D1, Q1, H1, Mi
Homology with P. abyssi PAB1947* 
Cbf5 without sRNA?
54 and 55
Cbf5 without sRNA? and/or homology to P. furiosus PF1139 (PsuX) 
See text 2V9K
all except Q1,H1
See text 2QMM
Homology with P. abyssi PAB1040* 
Homology with P. abyssi PAB0283* 
All harboring A57 except H1
Prediction this work
See text; 2I5H
Predictions of H. volcanii rRNA modifications genes
Prediction this work
See text, 1Q7H
C* = N330
Prediction this work
See text, 1QAN
Homology with M. jannaschii RsmA* 
23S Data From H. marismortuiD
Prediction, weak homology with E. coli RlmA 
See Additional file 8
See Additional file 8
Homology with E. coli RlmE 
Prediction, this work and 
See text, 1K3R
See Additional file 8
Guide RNA protein machinery
Homology P. furiosus Cbf5* 
2AUS, 2RFK, 2APO
Homology P. furiosus Gar1p* 
2HVY, 2EY4 2RFK
Homology P. furiosus Nop10* 
Homology S. solfataricus L7* 
1PXW, 2FC3, 1RLG, 1SDS, 2QA4
Homology with S. solfataricus aFib* 
1NT2, 1PRY 1G8S, 1FBN, 1G8A
Homology S. solfataricus Nop56/58* 
Remarkably, Halobacteria show more degenerated C, C', D and D' boxes and a longer region between D' and C' boxes (19 to 21 pb) than other orders (4 to 10 pb). In contrast, the insertion of Cm-32 found in the anticodon loop of four tRNAs (two specific for Lys, one for Tyr and one for Trp) and of Cm-56 found in all H. volcanii tRNAs (with no exceptions; see Additional file 1), is almost certainly catalyzed by non RNA guided enzymes. Indeed, a solid homolog of the TrmH (YhfQ) protein that has been found to catalyze the formation of Xm-32 in E. coli , is present in the genome of H. volcanii (Table 1). It is the only member of the SpoU family [92, 93] found in this organism. For Cm-56 in the Ψ-loop, a strong homolog of the P. abyssi protein found to catalyze this reaction in vitro ( and reviewed in ), can be identified in the genome of H. volcanii (Table 1).
Apart from Ψ-13 which is most certainly modified by the TruD ortholog (HVO_0658, belonging to COG0585, see table 1), seven other Ψ residues? are present in H. volcanii tRNA at positions 22, 28, 38, 39, 52, 54 and 55 (Figure 1). Ψ-55 is a universal modification inserted in yeast by Pus4p  and in E. coli by TruB , both belonging to the same COG0103. The only homolog of these two proteins that can be identified in the H. volcanii genome is Cbf5p, which is the catalytic subunit of the guide machinery (see below). However, recent work from different laboratories have shown that in vitro, Cbf5p can modify U-54 in tRNA, as well as in rRNA, in a guide-independent fashion, the enzymatic reaction being stimulated by the presence of Nop10p [98–100]. Psu10p from P. furiosus, that is not part of the TruB/Cbf5p family of proteins (COG0103) but is instead a member of the COG1258 family (Table 1), can also introduce the Ψ-55 modification in archaeal tRNAs in vitro. This observation has been validated by complementation experiment using an E. coli truB mutant . It is however still not clear which of the two enzymes (Cbf5p and/or Pus10p) is responsible for the formation of Ψ-55 (as well as of Psi-54) in Archaeal tRNAs in vivo. As discussed in , the possibility exists that each of the two Ψ-55 forming enzymatic systems act on distinct sets of tRNAs. It is worthy of mention that no Psu10p homolog is found in N. equitans, whereas a genes coding for Cbf5p and Nop10 homologs are detected (see "Archaeal rRNA modification" subsystem in the SEED database for sequences). Unfortunately, no evidence for the presence or absence of Ψ-55 in any of the tRNAs, or of Ψ in rRNA is available for this organism.
Other quasi universal Ψ. modifications are Ψ-38/39 of the anticodon branch inserted in yeast by Pus3p  and in E. coli by TruA , both members of the COG0101 family. Only one protein of this family could be identified in H. volcanii (Table 1). Its homology with both the E. coli and the yeast GOG0101 members is quite low but multiple sequence alignments using clustalw  confirmed that the critical TruA specific active site consensus sequence (XXXRTD)  is conserved in the Haloferax protein. No homologs of yeast Pusp 1- 9  or E. coli TruABCD (reviewed in ) could be identified in the H. volcanii genome, leaving Ψ 's at positions 22, 28 and 52 with no corresponding candidate pseudouridine synthase. The corresponding uridines are located in helical regions (at least in the fully mature tRNA), thus perhaps relatively inaccessible to the enzyme, and these are isomerized to Ψ only in one tRNA species, whereas the other Ψ modifications, at least those in positions 38, 54 and 55 are located in loops and found in several tRNAs (see Additional file 1). This led us to suppose they may be introduced at a very early stage of the tRNA biosynthesis, possibly still during transcription and when the cloverleaf structure of the nascent pre-tRNA is not yet formed, potentially by the RNA-guided machinery including Cbf5p, Nop10p, Gar1p and L7Ae homologs (Table 2). However no H/ACA snRNA could be identified in H. volcanii. This could be due to a high divergence of H/ACA RNA structures in H. volcanii or, as discussed above in the case of Ψ-55 formation, to a guide RNA independent pseudouridylation by the Cbf5p/Nop10p dependent machinery acting during transcription on an as yet unfinished tRNA molecule composed of stems and loops. One cannot however rule out that an as yet unidentified pseudouridine synthase family is present in this organism.
Four positions 39, 40, 48, 49 are modified to m5C in H. volcanii. In yeast, Trm4p is not site-specific and introduces this modification at several positions in tRNA molecules . Members of this huge family of proteins (COG0144) are however difficult to annotate by sequence alone as some also modify rRNA [107–109]. Recently one of the five COG0144 members from P. abyssi (PAB1947) was found to catalyze in vitro the formation of m5C at several positions in tRNA, including positions 48 and 49 . H. volcanii has just one member of this family (HVO_1594) that is highly similar to PAB1947, and ribosomal RNA of this organism does not contain any m5C (see Figures 2A–D). Hence, it is highly probable that HVO_1594 is the only RNA:m5C methyltransferase that modifies the four cytosines found in the sequenced tRNAs of H. volcanii (Figure 1). The presence of additional m5C residues at positions 50–52 in some tRNAs of H. cutirubrum probably also result from the action in this organism of a unique multi-site specific tRNA:m5C methyltransferase.
I57 and m1I57
The methylation at position 54 is a hallmark of Archaea, except in Thermococcales where m5U54 is found . COG1901 proteins that are part of SPOUT superfamily have been predicted as candidates for this missing methylase  and genes of this family do indeed cluster with Psu10p in several genomes (Figure 4A). However, it is present in organisms that are expected to have m5U and not m1Ψ at this position such as the Pyrococci . Experimental validation is required to ascertain the function of this putative Ψ-dependent methyltransferase (work in progress).
Modified uridine-34 derivatives
As a rule U34-harboring tRNAs belonging to the split codon boxes corresponding to Leu (UAA), Gln (UAG), Lys (UUU), Glu (UUC) and Arg (UCU) need to discriminate for the NN-Purine codons and not miscode for the NN-pyrimidine codons. Only certain types of modified U-34 can perform this task (reviewed in: ). In contrast, tRNAs bearing unmodified U-34 are able to decode codons ending with purines and pyrimidines, such as those found in the four codon decoding boxes as in Mycoplasma for example . As expected a modified U! (of which the chemical identity remains to be determined) was identified in naturally occurring tRNAs of H. volcanii specific for Lys (U!UU) and Glu (U!UC) [28, 29]. However for tRNA-Leu (?UAA) and tRNA-Arg (?UCU), the identity of U-34 is yet to be determined as these tRNAs remain to be sequenced (Figure 3 and Additional file 1). Curiously, U-34 of H. volcanii tRNA-Leu (UAA) was reported not to be modified, while the U-34 residue in tRNA-Leu (?UAG), tRNA-Arg (?UCG) and tRNA-Gly (?UCC) belonging to the four codons boxes appears to be (Figure 3). Unexpectedly, U-34 in tRNA-Pro (UGG) and tRNA-Ala (UGC) is not modified [28, 29], while the corresponding four codons decoding boxes contains two other tRNAs (one with G-34 and the other one with C-34) able to decode the other codons, except the one ending with A (see Figure 3). Thus the pattern of modified/unmodified U-34 in H. volcanii tRNAs is non-canonical and the exact chemical nature of the U! in the different tRNAs of H. volcanii remains an enigma [as well as in the few other archaeal tRNAs sequenced so far .
In the case of tRNAs specific for Gln, Lys and Glu in H. volcanii, a thiolated U-34 derivative should exist, as for their bacterial and eukaryal counterparts (for examples see [121, 122]). Indeed, in the genome of H. volcanii, a gene homolog to eukaryal Tuc1 belonging to COG0037 is found. In S. cerevisiae, this Tuc1 protein has recently been shown to be involved in the formation of s2U-34 in yeast cytoplasmic tRNAs . Also, clustering of Tuc1 with IscS and IscU, the two proteins required for donating the thio compound (Figure 4B) strengthens the prediction that this family of proteins do participate in the formation of thiolated compounds. However, analysis of the H. volcanii genome suggests that ?U34 in tRNAs, as in many other archaeal tRNAs, is more complex than just a s2U. Indeed, homologs of the yeast Trm9p methylase and of the radical SAM enzyme Elp3 are also found in H. volcanii genome (Table 1). Trm9p is the yeast mcm5U/mcm5s2U tRNA carboxyl methyltransferases  and Elp3 is in yeast part of the elongation complex comprised of 6 proteins Elp1-6 that have all been shown to have a role in the formation of mcm5(s2)U . In vivo the pleiotropic effect of mutations in the yeast Elp genes appear to be due to the absence of the modified base in tRNA . However, out of the six eukaryal Elp proteins only homologs of Elp3 can be found in Archaea. This protein is part of the radical SAM family . In S. solfataricus, the Elp3 and Trm9p encoding genes are also clustered (Figure 4B). Tuc1 is present in all sequenced genomes of Archaea, Elp3 is lacking only in N. equitans, and Trm9p homologs are found only in a limited subset of Archaea (see "Archaeal tRNA modification" subsystem referenced in the methods section). Taken together, the data suggest that the type of U-34 modification in H. volcanii tRNAs belonging to two codon split decoding boxes is similar but not identical to the mcm5s2U derivative found in eukaryal tRNAs.
Gupta proposed that mo5U-34 may exist in H. volcanii tRNAs. In bacteria it has been shown that chorismic acid is a precursor to mo5U-34 formation through the ho5U intermediate, with the product of cmoB catalyzing the conversion of ho5U-34 to mo5U-34 . CmoB protein is part of the methyltransferases type 11 family http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/IEntry?ac=IPR013216 that is difficult to annotate because it is so widespread. A distant homolog of CmoB was indeed identified (Table 2) and could be the potential mo5U synthase but this prediction is not very robust and absolutely requires experimental validation. The genes that are responsible for the formation of ho5U have not been identified in any organism.
Is found only at position 34 in many H. volcanii tRNAs. In certain Archaea and Eukaryotes it has also been detected in ribosomal RNA (see above). The only known enzyme involved in ac4C formation is yeast Tan1 (YGL232W ) that does not have any homolog in H. volcanii. However it was predicted that Tan1 binds tRNA and carries the recognition determinants but must function in complex with yet unidentified acetylation enzymes , reviewed in . One enzyme family COG1444, that contains an ATPase domain fused to an acetyltransferase domain was identified as a potential candidate. Genes of this family cluster with translation genes (Figure 4A). In yeast, the homolog (YNL132W) is essential , whereas the E. coli ypfI homolog is not , and has recently been shown to be responsible for ac4C formation in tRNA initiator in E. coli .
Finally, like Bacteria, all Archaea but N. equitans have a minor tRNA-Ile (CUA) [71, 84]. This requires the modification of C-34 to a C*. Otherwise this tRNA-Ile would be charged erroneously with methionine , reviewed in . In all bacteria except in Mycoplasma mobile , a lysinyl group is inserted by the ATP-dependent TilS family of enzymes , but in Archaea the structure of C-34 modification is still not known, and no tilS gene has been found in H. volcanii. Potential candidates for a gene coding for an enzyme catalyzing the selective modification of C-34 in tRNA-Ile (CAU) should be found in all Archaea but N. equitans and should also be absent in the genomes of E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Using the OrthoMCL phylogenetic distribution search tool , we identified 10 protein families that conform to the above criteria. We favor two candidates in this list for missing C*-synthase genes: i) the nucleic acid binding protein-OB fold family (COG1571) that contains a potential RNA binding domain, and ii) the COG2047 family, annotated as an ATP-grasp superfamily. Both these families cluster with tRNA modification genes in several Archaea (Figure 4C) and follow the expected phylogenetic distribution (see "Archaeal tRNA modification" subsystem in SEED).
Genes coding for ribosomal RNA modification enzymes
Very few Archaeal enzymes involved in the modification of ribosomal RNA have been experimentally characterized to date with the exception of the guide rRNA methylation and peudouridylation machinery enzymes (see for examples: [100, 135, 136]). However thus far little investigation has been performed in the case of halophilic organisms, including H. volcanii. The analysis below (Table 2, and references therein) is hence mainly based on comparative genomics predictions that await experimental validations.
Among modification enzymes acting on rRNA that can be easily identified in H. volcanii by sequence homology is the archaeal member of the RsmA/Dim1p family. This enzyme introduces four methyl groups in the conserved tandem adenosine in hairpin 45 of the 16S RNA to form m62A m62A (positions 1450 and 1451; 1518 and 1519, E. coli numbering). The function of the M. jannaschii RsmA ortholog was experimentally confirmed . A strong homolog of this enzyme is found in H. volcanii (Table 2).
Likewise, a homolog of RrmJ (or RlmE belonging to COG 1189) that catalyzes the formation of the quasi universally conserved Um at position 2552 of the hairpin 92 of bacterial 23S RNA  in E. coli (Um-2587 in H. marismortui) is also found in H. volcanii (Figure 2C and Table 2). In S. cerevisiae a site-specific Mrm2 enzyme introduces the same modification in the mitochondrial 21S (Um-2791)  but a guide RNA (SnR52) machinery is responsible for the equivalent cytoplasmic yeast 28S rRNA methylation (Um-2921) . In this later case, Spb1p (of COG 1189 as Mrm2 and RlmE) can also catalyze the formation of Um-2921 (2552 E. coli numbering) even if its normal function is to catalyze the 2'-O-methylation of adjacent G-2922 . Since the snRNP-dependent formation of Um-2921 occurs within the nucleus at an early step of the rRNA maturation process, and the action of Spb1 enzyme proceed later within the cytoplasm, only if U-2921 has not previously been fully modified in the nucleus, can Spb1p then complete the reaction . In the case of U-2587 (2552) and/or G-2588 (2553) methylation in 23S RNA of H. volcanii, searches for potential guide RNA have been unsuccessful by using both pattern matching approaches and the dedicated SnoScan software, while in P. abyssi, a sR25 C/D box sRNA was predicted to guide the methylation of U-2669 (U-2552 in E. coli) . Failure to detect the guide in the halophiles might be due to a divergent structure of the snRNAs in these organisms or could reflect the real absence of such guide RNAs for these particular methylation targets. The possibility exists that the halophilic RlmE homolog, identified above, is a multi-site specific enzyme and catalyzes both the formation of Um-2587 and Gm-2588. A precedent for such a situation is found in the enzymatic formation of m1A at both positions 57 and 58 of tRNA by the Pyrococcale TrmI enzyme , while the bacterial and eukaryal homologs (TrmI and Trm6p respectively) are strictly site-specific and methylate only A-58 in tRNAs [142, 143]. Another possibility is that Halophiles have multiple paralog copies (from 3–6 copies, see 'Archaeal RNA subsystem") of COG3269 family that contain the RNA binding TRAM (TR M2 A nd M iaB, domain)  and one of these enzymes could be responsible for the formation of Um-2921.
We found at least one C/D box sRNA candidate to guide the 2'O-methylation of the ribose at position G-1950 (1909 in E. coli). Homologous sequences were found in 25 archaeal genomes (Additional file 7). Moreover, our results suggest that in Pyrococcus, the sR41 orphan C/D box sRNA http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/snoRNAdb/Archaea/Pyro-annote.html could modify the equivalent of G-1950 position.
No homologs of the multiple known E. coli pseudouridine synthases that modify rRNA (for review see ) could be identified in H. volcanii. As demonstrated for rRNA of Eukarya and some Archaea, such as S. solfataricus, A. fulgidus or P. furiosus and P. abyssi, Ψ residues could also be introduced by the guide RNA machinery and indeed, all the enzymes needed are presents in the H. volcanii genome (Table 2). In Eukaryotes, the equivalent of Ψ-1956 and Ψ-1958 are modified by the same H/ACA sRNA, respectively U19 in Human and snR191 in Yeast. In Archaea the equivalent of Ψ 1956 was proposed to be modified in Pyrococcales and A. Fulgidus respectively by Pf7 in P. furiosus and Afu4 in A. Fulgidus . Recently a combination of in silico and experimental work identified seven H/ACA involved in pseudouridylation of rRNA in P. abyssi while a total of 17 Ψ residues were detected . Some of these sRNA modify several positions in rRNA but clearly not all the 17 Ψ residues are accounted for, and for certain positions (such as Ψ-2603 of P. abyssi rRNA) the modification can be introduced in vitro by the Cbf5p/Nop10p dependent complex in the absence of any guide RNA . Indeed Ψ-2016 (Ψ-1956) was introduce by the Pf7 homolog (Pab40) and the Afu-4 H/ACA sRNA in vitro but the modification equivalent to Ψ-1958 was not . Pf7 contains three hairpin motifs, namely Pf7-stem-I, Pf7-stem-II and Pf7-stem-III, each one able to guide a modification. The in silico approach used in the present analysis allowed to identify two H/ACA sRNA hairpins, respectively HP1 and HP2, candidate to the modifications of Ψ-1956, Ψ-1958 and Ψ-2621. We did not find the homolog of Pf7-stemI hairpin, which is consistent with the absence of a fourth modification in H. marismortuii. HP2 is clearly the homolog of Pf7-stemIII and HP1 appear to be the homolog of Pf7-stemII. Remarkably in H. volcanii and other halobacteria, both hairpins are conserved but are separated by a long spacer whereas they are adjacent in thermococcales. HP2 would be able to guide Ψ 1956 and Ψ 1958 by forming alternative structures around the position to modify (see Additional file 8B) while the HP1 could target Ψ-2621 (see additional file 8A). Remarkably in P. abyssi, this last modification was not found experimentally  whereas Pab40 could adopt an alternative structure able to target this position (see Additional file 8A). Finally we did not find the homolog of Pf7-I and Pf7-II in the Crenarchaeote Ignococcus hospitalis. Certainly, the modification targeted is not present.
This methylated adenosine is located in hairpin 25.1 (position 628) of Domain II (Figure 2C). A weak homologs of RlmA that introduces a m1G in the E. coli large subunit in position 745  can be identified (Table 2) and is a possible candidate for the formation of m1A, even if it is a different purine base. Indeed, during evolution, an enzyme able to methylated N1 in guanosine might have adapted to methylation of N1 in adenosine, exactly as an ancient C5-methylated enzyme has derived to become a C5-methyltransferase of uridine by simply changing few aminoacids in the active site in order to accommodate U instead of C [147, 148].
This N3 methylated uridine (position 2619 in 23S RNA, 2584 in E. coli) is located between hairpins 92 and 93 (Figure 2C). A good candidate for the missing m3U inserting enzyme in H. volcanii is the protein belonging to COG2106 (Table 2). Indeed, analyzing the SPOUT family enzymes, Bujnicki and coll.  found that COG1385, exemplified by E. coli RsmE that introduces the m3U modification in 16S RNA , has a complementary phylogenetic distribution to the COG 2106 family found in Archaea and eukaryotes. Moreover, genes encoding COG2106 proteins are inserted in operons encoding for ribosomal proteins in phylogenetically diverse Archaea such as the Pyrococci, Archeoglobus fulgidus and H. salinarium (data not shown).
This methylated exocyclic NH2 of adenosine is located at position 1432 (1500 E. coli numbering) of 16S RNA in helix 44 in the 3' minor domain (Figure 2A). Compilation of modification data in the SSU RNA modification database  shows that the m6A modification found in the H. volcanii 16S RNA can also be found at the same position in S. solfataricus and in three eukaryotes Homo sapiens, Xenopus laevis and Rattus norvegicus. By searching for genes that are present in these four organisms (and that are generally annotated as methylansferase) we identified the COG2263 family. Annotated as RNA methyltransferase or N6-DNA-methylase, members of this family are present in most archaea and many eukaryotes. The structure of the COG2263 member PH1948 was determined in complex with S-AdoMet  and revealed that this protein was a structural homolog of ErmC' (pdb :1QAN) that confers resistance to macrolides by introducing an N6-methylation at adenine 2058 (as E. coli numbering) of 23S rRNA . We propose that the H. volcanii COG2263 member (Table 2) is also involved in m6A formation but in the 16S RNA, not the 23S RNA.
This uridine bearing a 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl group on N3 of uridine is located at position 910 (966 E. coli numbering) of hairpin 31 in 3'major domain of 16S RNA (Figure 2A). It is modified to m1acp3Ψ. in all eukaryotes analyzed so far but is never present in small RNA subunits of bacteria that always have a non modified G (or m2G) in this position . Using the phylogenetic pattern tool of the OrthoMCL database  we searched for genes that are conserved in mammals, S. cerevisiae and all Archaea but absent in all bacteria. A large collection of genes follow this pattern (89 altogether), most of them are ribosomal proteins and other translation related genes. One candidate stood out as a potential acp3U inserting enzyme, the COG2016 family. Proteins of this family are found in all sequenced Archaea and eukaryotes and contain a C-terminal PUA domain (P seudo U ridine synthase and A rchaeosine transglycosylase) that is often involved in RNA binding . The yeast member of the COG2016 family, YER007C-A, has been shown to associate with ribosomes and a null mutant has clear translation defects .
Beside the putative genes identified above, a few other genes corresponding to as yet unidentified modified nucleotides need to be discovered, such as for the currently unidentified C*(N330) derivative located at position 1352 in hairpin 44 in the 3' minor domain SSU RNA (Figure 2A). N-330 is also found at the same position in the bacteria Thermotoga maritima . Lastly, while the possibility is meager, one or two additional modified nucleotides might still exist in rRNAs of H. volcanii. Indeed, the full lengths of the 16S and 23S (1472 nt and 2922 nt respectively) of H. volcanii or of H. marismortui have not been explored, only the most critical regions where the probability was high to discover conserved or semi-conserved nucleotides have been investigated.
The archaeaon Haloferax volcanii has the particularity of being a 'salt-loving' prokaryote that lives in the mildly hot and hypersaline environment of the Dead Sea (40- 50°C, 1.5-3M NaCl) where it was first isolated [27, 154]. Life at such high salt concentrations is energetically costly. Indeed, to insure the osmotic balance between the cytosol and the high salt environment in which they thrive, halophiles have to accumulate and maintain high concentrations of solutes. These are mainly inorganic ions, such as KCl that can reach molar concentrations or Mg2+, but various organic osmotic solutes such as glycerol, trehalose and/or glycine betaine are also used [154, 155]. As there are no visible compartments in the Haloferax cell , this lifestyle requires the adaptation of the entire intracellular enzymatic machinery, including RNA maturation and mRNA translation processes. Indeed, at high salt concentrations, the high molecular weight rRNA and the majority of proteins from non halophilic prokaryotes simply precipitate (reviewed in ).
Here we combine the identification of the whole set of functional tRNAs, including the presence of modified nucleosides (tRNomics), with the identification of most of the corresponding RNA modification enzymes (Modomics) in H. volcanii. This analysis allows to address: i) the peculiarities of the decoding strategies used by H. volcanii to read the 62 (61+1 initiator) sense codons of mRNAs; and ii) to emphasize the relative low number of modifications in halophilic t+rRNAs. This work is a logical continuation of a similar tRNomics analysis of fully sequenced genomes from the three kingdoms of life [71, 73, 158], later extended to the Modomics analysis of Mollicutes, a family of parasites that underwent a drastic reduction of their genomes during evolution . On an evolution point of view, Halobacteriales like the euryarchaeon H. volcanii, and other distantly related organisms able to grow at salt concentrations above 100 g/L (1.7 M NaCl), such as certain Methanosarcinales (Archaea), Flavobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria (Bacteria) or a few Flagellated, Ciliates and Fungi (Eukarya), are all located on a relatively 'recent' branches of the small subunit rRNA based phylogenetic tree (see Figure 1 in ). Thus, emergence of halophilic organisms likely results from an adaptive-type of cellular evolution from a non-halophilic ancestor arising independently several times during the evolution of the three domains of life.
The detailed mechanism by which mRNAs are accurately decoded without slippage by the ribosome in an extremely halophiles is largely ignored. The only published study using cell-free system from Halobacterium cutirubrum shows that incorporation of radiolabeled amino-acids into polypeptides under the direction of synthetic polyribonucleotides, follows the same decoding rules found in non halophilic organisms, but that the accuracy of amino acids incorporation was dependent on the presence of various salts at high concentrations (KCl, NaCl, NH4Cl – ). This lead to the conclusion that the codon recognition processes are only secondarily dependent on ionic interactions and that the effect of salts was probably to enable all the macromolecular components to assume their correct secondary and tertiary configuration, a conclusion that is evident nowadays.
Type and location of tRNA modifications of representative organisms belonging to the three domains of life Archaea (A), Eubacteria (B) and Eukarya (E)
S. cer (mito)
Cm, Ψ, m3C
Cm, ?s 2 U
Cm, Um, s2U
Um, s 2 U
Cm,Um,Gm,s 2 U
m 1 G, t 6 A
m 1 G, t 6 A
m 1 G, t 6 A, m 6 t 6 A
m 1 G, t 6 A
m 1 G, t 6 A
m 5 C, U m
Ψ, m 1 Ψ
m 1 I
Type and location of rRNA modifications of representative organisms belonging to the three domains of life Archaea (A), Eubacteria (B) and Eukarya (E)
S. cer (mito)
Enz for m2G
C* = N330-1352
m 6 A
m 6 2 A
Enz for m62A
m 6 2 A-1518
m 6 2 A-1780
m 6 2 A
Enz for m62A
m 6 2 A-1519
m 6 2 A-1781
Enz for Ψ
m 3 Ψ-1915
Enz for Ψ
Enz for Gm
Enz for U m
U m -2552
U m -2921
U m -2791
m 3 U
A clear positive correlation has been observed between the total number of ribose methylation sites, the eventual corresponding number of methylation guide sRNAs and the optimal temperature at which an organism is growing, suggesting an important role of this type of modification in RNA stabilization (reviewed in ). Clearly as the number of 2'- O-methyl ribose is exceptionally low in rRNA of halophiles, the rules guiding the faithful maturation of rRNA molecule, as well as the stabilization of their quaternary structure within the ribosome, might differ from other Archaea (psychrophiles, mesophiles and hyperthermophiles). Of note also is the absence of polyamines in extreme halophiles, as the slight amount of polyamines that can be detected actually originate from the culture medium (Oshima Tairo, personal communication). Polyamines, like Mg2+ and other ions stabilize nucleic acids (reviewed in ) and also facilitate protein synthesis [162, 163]. The 3D structure of the large 50S subunit of H. marismortui has been solved to 2.4 Angstrom resolution . Analysis of the structure reveals a great number of monovalent and divalent ions as well as water molecules that are critical for the formation and stabilization of that rRNA structure. Hence, we propose that the presence of high concentration of salts (mono- and divalent) in the cytosol of H. volcanii has allowed the elimination of numerous rRNA and tRNA modifications as well as of polyamines biosynthesis, whose 'global' functions are to allow faithful maturation of pre-t+rRNAs and/or to stabilize the mature t+rRNAs and their association with other proteins (e.g. quaternary structure in the case of ribosome). If the functional replacement of many RNA modification by salts had indeed occurred, then modified nucleotides remaining in t+rRNA of halophilic organism must serve purposes other than stabilization of RNA architecture, such as decoding, accuracy of translation or other functions that cannot be functionally replaced by the electrostatic interactions provided by the surrounding salts. This hypothesis is corroborated with the fact that most, if not all of the modified nucleoside found in H. volcanii/H. marismortui rRNA are among the most evolutionary conserved modified nucleosides along organisms of the three biological domains (Table 4 and discussed above in data section). They are also among those we have pointed out as being the most refractory to reductive evolution in Mycoplasma . This would suggest that the modifications remaining in H. volcanii tRNA are also critical for functions that cannot be replaced by salt and we are currently mutating all the corresponding genes to address the functional of these modifications in vivo.
This tRNomics and Modomics analysis of H. volcanii reinforces the necessity to integrate the knowledge of both t+rRNA sequences and modifications in order to understand the decoding properties of a given organisms. For most organisms this information can be derived only from comparative genomic analysis as sequence information of mature RNAs are lacking. However, to predict the presence or absence of modified nucleotides just from the analysis of the encoded genes is still quite dangerous and requires the type of systematic analysis performed here as a foundation in order to analyze other Archaeal genomes and understand of the function of RNA modification in Archaeal translation and its evolutionary importance.
tRNA genes searches in the H. volcanii genome
The complete genome of H. volcanii DS2 (April 2007 (haloVolc1) assembly) was obtained using the UCSC Archaeal Genome Browser http://archaea.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?hgsid=84889&chromInfoPage=. The full set of tRNA genes (tDNAs) was first identified by searching the nucleotide sequence corresponding to all the archaeal-type conserved tRNA cloverleaf structures (for details see ). Verification with tRNAscan-SE disclosed two more genes displaying anomalously low Cove score values. Close examination of the sequences revealed the presence of an anomalous G at position 58 (instead of the universal A58) in elongator tDNA-Met (CAT) (Cove score: 54.0); this remarkable sequence exception is confirmed by the tRNA sequencing . The other exception is a G at position 8 (instead of the universal pyrimidine T8/C8) in tDNA-Thr (TGT) (Cove score: 44.6). This tRNA however was not sequenced, but one can observed in this tRNA that base 14, which is usually paired with base 8 (Watson-Crick A-T pair), is also exceptionally G instead of A suggesting a Hoogsteen G8-G14 base pair. The complete list of the 52 tDNAs of H. volcanii tabulated in a linear, as well as in a cloverleaf representations is given in Additional file 2. These 52 genes correspond to 46 different tRNAs (different anticodons) since 6 genes are present in two copies (the two copies of tDNA-Gly (GCC) slightly differ in the amino acid stem only). Only three genes bear introns: tRNA-Trp (CCA), tRNA-Gln (TTG) and tRNA-Met (CAT) – for details see text below.
Compilation of mature tRNA sequences harboring modified nucleotides
The linear sequences of the 41 naturally occurring mature tRNAs of H. volcanii, as sequenced by Gupta [28, 29] are listed in Additional file 1 (including the two variants of tRNA-Gly (GCC)). From comparison with the other fully sequenced tRNAs, the presence of many modified nucleotides in these tDNAs can however easily be inferred. Beside C* in the minor tRNA-Ile (C*AU) and U* in several U34-containing tRNAs, the chemical structures of all modified nucleotides are known. The probability of unknown modified nucleotides remaining in one of the six unsequenced tRNAs of H. volcanii is small. Analysis of the 12 additional sequences from other mesophilic halophiles, reveals the presence of m5C at positions 50 of tRNA-Thr (GGU), position 51 of tRNA-Val (CAC+GAC) and position 52 of tRNA-Arg (GCG), as well as of m1G at position 9 in tRNA-Val (CAC) and probably also in tRNA-His (GUG) and tRNA-Gln (CUG) in H. cutirubrum. These last modifications are not found in any of the sequenced tRNAs of H. volcanii.
Mining genes coding for RNA modification enzymes
Most of the comparative genomic analysis to identify putative RNA modification genes was performed in the integrative SEED database at http://anno-3.nmpdr.org/anno/FIG/subsys.cgi. Results are made available in the "Archaeal tRNA modification" and the "Archaeal rRNA modification subsystem" on the publicly available server http://theseed.uchicago.edu/FIG/index.cgi. Microbes online  was also used for clustering analysis and mining co-expression data. The phylogenetic pattern searches were performed using the signature search tool on the NMPDR server , the COG phylogenetic pattern search at NCBI (, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/old/phylox.html), the ortholog table tool at the MBGD database , the phylogenetic search query forms of OrthoMCL  or of the Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) database . Genome specific BLAST searches  were also performed at NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi. Phylogenetic distribution of any given gene family was obtained through the IMG database . Information on the presence of a given modification in RNA was essentially extracted from the RNA modification database , the tRNA database , the small rRNA modification database  and the 3D ribosomal modification map database  (for corresponding http, see above in Introduction section). Databases for rRNA and snoRNA that are involved in RNA-guided modifications are located at. http://people.biochem.umass.edu/fournierlab/snornadb/main.php and http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/snoRNAdb/. Additional information was extracted from specific articles cited throughout the text.
Mining genes coding for C/D and H/ACA boxes RNA guide of RNA modifications
In archaea, C/D box sRNA contains four short conserved sequence motifs called the C box (RUGAUGA), D' box (CUGA), C' box (UGAUGA) and D box (CUGA), and one or two antisense elements. Each antisense element is 8-12nt long, is located immediately upstream of box D or D', and shows conserved complementarities spanning the site of modification. Each antisense element is the determinant of the site-specificity of the methylation site which is always the nucleotide of the target sequence paired to the fifth sRNA nucleotide upstream from the D(D') box (See Additional file 6, and ). Archaeal H/ACA sRNA are composed of one, two, or three stem-loop structure [145, 175, 176]. Each of these stem-loop structures can be described by two stems separated by an internal loop, a K-turn motif, and a conserved ANA (generally ACA) motif at the 3' end. The internal loop is composed of two single stranded regions which are complementary to a target region around the modified nucleotide. The target region itself encompasses two regions able to form the duplex by forming RNA-RNA interactions with the internal loop. These two regions are separated by UN, U being the uridine which will be converted into a pseudouridine (see Additional file 6
The C/D box and H/ACA box sRNAs responsible for a given set of modifications were searched by using PatScan and Darn! http://carlit.toulouse.inra.fr/Darn/. In principle, the knowledge of presence of 2'-O-methyl derivatives as well as of Ψ in RNA is of great help to identify potential sRNAs. However, as Halobacteria may use non canonical type of sRNAs, the task is not simple. Despite this, for C/D box sRNA, we used a signature describing half of a C/D box sRNA containing a C (C') box motif, a short spacer, the antisense region and a D (D') box motif. The antisense region was modeled as a motif complementary to the sequence spanning four nucleotides before and after the target position. Each candidate was then extended either at its 5' or 3' end to obtain a complete sRNA sequence. In some cases, it was necessary to degenerate the signature (including one or two errors in C, C', D, D' and antisense regions) to obtain a good sRNA candidate. The same strategy was used for H/ACA sRNA. For H/ACA sRNA, the initial signature contained the characteristics of a stem-loop structure with the stem down to the pocket, the two 3–5 nt antisense elements surrounding the residue to modify, a K-turn (K-loop) motif and an ANA motif situated 13–16 nucleotides from the Ψ residue. For each candidate found, we searched for homologous sequences by combining pattern matching approaches and similariy searches (using NCBI-Blast against complete genomes of archaea at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/lproks.cgi. Only candidates found in inter-coding sequences and showing strong homology evidence were kept as good candidates.
Comparison with known sRNA was performed by using data from the literature and available databases http://people.biochem.umass.edu/fournierlab/snornadb/main.php, http://www-snorna.biotoul.fr/,. http://bioinf.scri.sari.ac.uk/cgi-bin/plant_snorna/home and http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/snoRNAdb/).
All tRNA genes and mature tRNA (with their anticodon in brackets) are designated as this example: tDNA-Ile (GAT) and tRNA-Ile (GAU) respectively. The conventional numbering system for tRNA positions and the symbols used for the modified nucleosides are those adopted in the tRNA database . The number after a ribonucleotide (symbolized by A, U, G, C) or its modified counterpart corresponds to its position in the tRNA molecules. In the case of rRNA, unless otherwise specified, numbers correspond to the equivalent position in the E. coli rRNA. Only nucleoside C* is unconventional. As discussed below, C* found at the wobble position 34 of H. volcanii tRNA-Ile (anticodon C*AU) corresponds to a yet incompletely characterized, probably 'lysidine-type' cytosine, while at position 1342 (1404 E. coli numbering) of H. volcanii 16S rRNA, C* corresponds to another uncharacterized C-derivative of a molecular mass of 330.117 Da (N-330). Detailed chemical structures, scientific and common names corresponding to each indicated modified nucleoside and as well as of the corresponding RNA modification enzymes can be found at http://library.med.utah.edu/RNAmods/ and at http://modomics.genesilico.pl
Cluster of Orthologous Group
open reading frame
- SAM or S- AdoMet:
peptidyl transferase center
National Center for Biotechnology Information
We wish to thank Jonathan Eisen for making the sequence of Haloferax volcanii publicly available before publication, Ian K. Blaby for improving the manuscript and Jean-Pierre Rousset for stimulating discussions. This work was supported by US Public Health Service grant number GM19351 to Maurille J. Fournier (W.D) and the National Science Foundation grant number MCB-05169448 to V dC.L.
- Limbach PA, Crain PF, McCloskey JA: Summary: the modified nucleosides of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 2183-2196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozenski J, Crain PF, McCloskey JA: The RNA Modification Database: 1999 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 196-197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCloskey JA, Rozenski J: The Small Subunit rRNA Modification Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D135-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sprinzl M, Vassilenko KS: Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D139-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gustilo EM, Vendeix FAP, Agris PF: tRNA's modifications bring order to gene expression. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008, 11: 134-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishitani R, Yokoyama S, Nureki O: Structure, dynamics, and function of RNA modification enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008, 18: 330-339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giegé R, Sissler M, Florentz C: Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 5017-5035.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Björk GR, Hagervall TG: Transfer RNA modification. Escherichia coli and Salmonella Cellular and Molecular Biology. Edited by: Böck A, Curtis R, Kaper JB, Neidhardt FC, Nyström T, Squires CL. 2005, Washington DC: ASM. Press, [http://www.ecosal.org]Google Scholar
- Helm M: Post-transcriptional nucleotide modification and alternative folding of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 721-733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hopper AK, Phizicky EM: tRNA transfers to the limelight. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 162-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brimacombe R, Mitchell P, Osswald M, Stade K, Bochkariov D: Clustering of modified nucleotides at the functional center of bacterial ribosomal RNA. FASEB J. 1993, 7: 161-167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Decatur WA, Fournier MJ: rRNA modifications and ribosome function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002, 27: 344-351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ofengand J, Del Campo M: Modified nucleotides of E. coli ribosomal RNA. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Edited by: Böck A, Curtis R, Kaper JB, Neidhardt FC, Nyström T, Squires CL. 2005, Washington DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol. Press, [http://www.ecosal.org]Google Scholar
- Piekna-Przybylska D, Decatur WA, Fournier MJ: The 3D rRNA modification maps database: with interactive tools for ribosome analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D178-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow CS, Lamichhane TN, Mahto SK: Expanding the nucleotide repertoire of the ribosome with post-Transcriptional modifications. ACS Chem Biol. 2007, 2: 610-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang X-H, Liu Q, Fournier MJ: rRNA modifications in an intersubunit bridge of the ribosome strongly affect both ribosome biogenesis and activity. Mol Cell. 2007, 28: 965-977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ejby M, Sorensen MA, Pedersen S: Pseudouridylation of helix 69 of 23S rRNA is necessary for an effective translation termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 19410-19415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baxter-Roshek JL, Petrov AN, Dinman JD: Optimization of ribosome structure and function by rRNA base modification. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e174-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esguerra J, Warringer J, Blomberg A: Functional importance of individual rRNA 2'-O -ribose methylations revealed by high-resolution phenotyping. RNA. 2008, 14: 649-656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- King TH, Liu B, McCully RR, Fournier MJ: Ribosome structure and activity are altered in cells lacking snoRNPs that form pseudouridines in the peptidyl transferase center. Mol Cell. 2003, 11: 425-435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das G, Thotala DK, Kapoor S, Karunanithi S, Thakur SS, Singh NS, Varshney U: Role of 16S ribosomal RNA methylations in translation initiation in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 2008, 27: 840-851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraiya AA, Lamichhane TN, Chow CS, SantaLucia J, Cunningham PR: Identification and role of functionally important motifs in the 970 loop of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 2008, 376: 645-657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosjean H, Gupta R, Maxwell ES: Modified nucleotides in Archaeal RNAs. Archaea: new models for prokaryotic Biology. Edited by: Blum P. 2008, Horizon Scientific Press, Caister Academic Press, 171-196.Google Scholar
- Piekna-Przybylska D, Decatur WA, Fournier MJ: New bioinformatic tools for analysis of nucleotide modifications in eukaryotic rRNA. RNA. 2007, 13: 305-312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pomerantz SC, McCloskey JA: Analysis of RNA hydrolyzates by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 193: 796-824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emmerechts G, Barbe S, Herdewijn P, Anne J, Rozenski J: Post-transcriptional modification mapping in the Clostridium acetobutylicum 16S rRNA by mass spectrometry and reverse transcriptase assays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 3494-3503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullakhanbhai MF, Larsen H: Halobacterium volcanii spec. nov., a Dead Sea halobacterium with a moderate salt requirement. Arch Microbiol. 1975, 104: 207-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta R: Halobacterium volcanii tRNAs: identification of 41 tRNAs covering all amino acids, and the sequences of 33 Class I tRNAs. J Biol Chem. 1984, 259: 9461-9471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta RC: Transfer RNAs of Halobacterium volcanii : sequences of five leucine and three serine tRNAs. System Appl Microbiol. 1986, 7: 102-105.Google Scholar
- Gupta R, Lanter JM, Woese CR: Sequence of the 16S Ribosomal RNA from Halobacterium volcanii, an Archaebacterium. Science. 1983, 221: 656-659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kowalak JA, Bruenger E, Crain PF, McCloskey JA: Identities and phylogenetic comparisons of posttranscriptional modifications in 16S ribosomal RNA from Haloferax volcanii. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 24484-24489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Del Campo M, Recinos C, Yanez G, Pomerantz SC, Guymon R, Crain PF, McCloskey JA, Ofengand J: Number, position, and significance of the pseudouridines in the large subunit ribosomal RNA of Haloarcula marismortui and Deinococcus radiodurans. RNA. 2005, 11: 210-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirpekar F, Hansen LH, Rasmussen A, Poehlsgaard J, Vester B: The archaeon Haloarcula marismortui has few modifications in the central parts of its 23S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 2005, 348: 563-573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Crécy-Lagard V, Marck C, Brochier-Armanet C, Grosjean H: Comparative RNomics and Modomics in Mollicutes: prediction of gene function and evolutionary implications. IUBMB Life. 2007, 1-25.Google Scholar
- de Crécy-Lagard V: Identification of genes encoding tRNA modification enzymes by comparative genomics. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 425: 153-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agris PF: The importance of being modified: roles of modified nucleosides and Mg2+ in RNA structure and function. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996, 53: 79-129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Persson BC: Modification of tRNA as a regulatory device. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 8: 1011-1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kowalak JA, Dalluge JJ, McCloskey JA, Stetter KO: The role of posttranscriptional modification in stabilization of transfer RNA from hyperthermophiles. Biochemistry. 1994, 33: 7869-7876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winkler ME: Genetics and regulation of base modification in the tRNA and rRNA of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Modification and Editing of RNA. Edited by: Grosjean H, Benne R. Washington. 1998, ASM Press, 441-469.Google Scholar
- Björk GR, Rasmuson T: Links between tRNA modification and metabolisms and modified nucleosides as tumor markers. Modification and Editing of RNA. Edited by: Grosjean H, Benne R. 1998, Washington, D. C.: ASM Press, 471-491.Google Scholar
- Shigi N, Suzuki T, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S, Watanabe K: Temperature-dependent biosynthesis of 2-thioribothymidine of Thermus thermophilus tRNA. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 2104-2113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu Z, O'Farrell HC, Rife JP, Culver GM: A conserved rRNA methyltransferase regulates ribosome biogenesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008, 15: 534-536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue K, Basu S, Inouye M: Dissection of 16S rRNA Methyltransferase (KsgA) Function in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 8510-8518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lafontaine DLJ, Preiss T, Tollervey D: Yeast 18S rRNA dimethylase Dim1p: a quality control mechanism in ribosome synthesis?. Mol Cell Biol. 1998, 18: 2360-2370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guymon R, Pomerantz SC, Ison JN, Crain PF, McCloskey JA: Post-transcriptional modifications in the small subunit ribosomal RNA from Thermotoga maritima, including presence of a novel modified cytidine. RNA. 2007, 13: 396-403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guymon R, Pomerantz SC, Crain PF, McCloskey JA: Influence of phylogeny on posttranscriptional modification of rRNA in thermophilic prokaryotes: the complete modification map of 16S rRNA of Thermus thermophilus. Biochemistry. 2006, 45: 4888-4899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Ahsen U, Noller HF: Identification of bases in 16S rRNA essential for tRNA binding at the 30S ribosomal P site. Science. 1995, 267: 234-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korostelev A, Trakhanov S, Laurberg M, Noller HF: Crystal structure of a 70S ribosome-tRNA complex reveals functional interactions and rearrangements. Cell. 2006, 126: 1065-1077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yusupov MM, Yusupova GZ, Baucom A, Lieberman K, Earnest TN, Cate JHD, Noller HF: Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 Å resolution. Science. 2001, 292: 883-896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selmer M, Dunham CM, Murphy FVIV, Weixlbaumer A, Petry S, Kelley AC, Weir JR, Ramakrishnan V: Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science. 2006, 313: 1935-1942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moazed D, Noller HF: Binding of tRNA to the ribosomal A and P sites protects two distinct sets of nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. J Mol Biol. 1990, 211: 135-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesnyak DV, Osipiuk J, Skarina T, Sergiev PV, Bogdanov AA, Edwards A, Savchenko A, Joachimiak A, Dontsova OA: Methyltransferase that modifies guanine 966 of the 16S rRNA: Functional identification and tertiary structure. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 5880-5887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogle JM, Brodersen DE, Clemons WM, Tarry MJ, Carter AP, Ramakrishnan V: Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit. Science. 2001, 292: 897-902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogle JM, Murphy FV, Tarry MJ, Ramakrishnan V: Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form. Cell. 2002, 111: 721-732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carter AP, Clemons WM, Brodersen DE, Morgan-Warren RJ, Wimberly BT, Ramakrishnan V: Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics. Nature. 2000, 407: 340-348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansen MA, Kirpekar F, Ritterbusch W, Vester B: Posttranscriptional modifications in the A-loop of 23S rRNAs from selected archaea and eubacteria. RNA. 2002, 8: 202-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maivali ULO, Remme J: Definition of bases in 23S rRNA essential for ribosomal subunit association. RNA. 2004, 10: 600-604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sumita M, Desaulniers J-P, Chang Y-C, Chui HMP, Clos L, Chow CS: Effects of nucleotide substitution and modification on the stability and structure of helix 69 from 28S rRNA. RNA. 2005, 11: 1420-1429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abeysirigunawardena SC, Chow CS: pH-dependent structural changes of helix 69 from Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA. RNA. 2008, 14: 782-792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liiv A, Karitkina D, Maivali U, Remme J: Analysis of the function of E. coli 23S rRNA helix-loop 69 by mutagenesis. BMC Mol Biol. 2005, 6: 18-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirabayashi N, Sato NS, Suzuki T: Conserved loop sequence of helix 69 in Escherichia coli 23 S rRNA is involved in A-site tRNA binding and translational Fidelity. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 17203-17211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pai RD, Zhang W, Schuwirth BS, Hirokawa G, Kaji H, Kaji A, Cate JHD: Structural insights into ribosome recycling factor interaction with the 70S ribosome. J Mol Biol. 2008, 376: 1334-1347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nissen P, Hansen J, Ban N, Moore PB, Steitz TA: The structural basis of ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science. 2000, 289: 920-930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DF, Green R: Base-Pairing between 23S rRNA and tRNA in the Ribosomal A Site. Mol Cell. 1999, 4: 859-864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barta A, Steiner G, Brosius J, Noller HF, Kuechler E: Identification of a site on 23S ribosomal RNA located at the peptidyl transferase center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 3607-3611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vester B, Garrett RA: The importance of highly conserved nucleotides in the binding region of chloramphenicol at the peptidyl transfer centre of Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1988, 7: 3577-3587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lázaro E, Rodriguez-Fonseca C, Porse B, Ureña D, Garrett RA, Ballesta JPG: A sparsomycin-resistant mutant of Halobacterium salinarium lacks a modification at nucleotide U2603 in the peptidyl transferase centre of 23 S rRNA. J Mol Biol. 1996, 261: 231-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruenger E, Kowalak JA, Kuchino Y, McCloskey JA, Mizushima H, Stetter KO, Crain PF: 5S rRNA modification in the hyperthermophilic archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus and Pyrodictium occultum. Faseb J. 1993, 7: 196-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirpekar F, Douthwaite S, Roepstorff P: Mapping posttranscriptional modifications in 5S ribosomal RNA by MALDI mass spectrometry. RNA. 2000, 6: 296-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Breuert S, Allers T, Spohn G, Soppa Jr: Regulated polyploidy in halophilic Archaea. PLoS ONE. 2006, 1: e92-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marck C, Grosjean H: tRNomics: analysis of tRNA genes from 50 genomes of Eukarya, Archaea, and Bacteria reveals anticodon-sparing strategies and domain-specific features. RNA. 2002, 8: 1189-1232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Engelke DR, Hopper AK: Modified view of tRNA: stability amid sequence diversity. Mol Cell. 2006, 21: 144-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marck C, Grosjean H: Identification of BHB splicing motifs in intron-containing tRNAs from 18 archaea: evolutionary implications. RNA. 2003, 9: 1516-1531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clouet d'Orval B, Bortolin ML, Gaspin C, Bachellerie JP: Box C/D RNA guides for the ribose methylation of archaeal tRNAs. The tRNATrp intron guides the formation of two ribose-methylated nucleosides in the mature tRNATrp. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 4518-4529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK, Gurha P, Tran EJ, Maxwell ES, Gupta R: Sequential 2'-O-methylation of archaeal pre-tRNATrp nucleotides is guided by the intron-encoded but trans-acting box C/D ribonucleoprotein of pre-tRNA. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 47661-47671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bortolin M-L, Bachellerie J-P, Clouet-d'Orval B: In vitro RNP assembly and methylation guide activity of an unusual box C/D RNA, cis-acting archaeal pre-tRNATrp. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 6524-6535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh S, Guhra P, Gupta R: Dynamic guide-target interactions contribute to sequential 2'-O -methylation by a unique archaeal dual guide box C/D snRNP. RNA. 2008, 14: 1411-1423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stern L, Schulman LH: The role of the minor base N4-acetylcytidine in the function of the Escherichia coli noninitiator methionine transfer RNA. J Biol Chem. 1978, 253: 6132-6139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson MJO, Bystrom AS: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TAN1 gene is required for N4-acetylcytidine formation in tRNA. RNA. 2004, 10: 712-719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawai G, Hashizume T, Miyazawa T, McCloskey JA, Yokoyama S: Conformational characteristics of 4-acetylcytidine found in tRNA. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1989, 21: 61-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawai G, Yamamoto Y, Kamimura T, Masegi T, Sekine M, Hata T, Iimori T, Watanabe T, Miyazawa T, Yokoyama S: Conformational rigidity of specific pyrimidine residues in tRNA arises from posttranscriptional modifications that enhance steric interaction between the base and the 2'-hydroxyl group. Biochemistry. 1992, 31: 1040-1046.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muramatsu T, Yokoyama S, Horie N, Matsuda A, Ueda T, Yamaizumi Z, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T: A novel lysine-substituted nucleoside in the first position of the anticodon of minor isoleucine tRNA from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 9261-9267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosjean H, Björk GR: Enzymatic conversion of cytidine to lysidine in anticodon of bacterial tRNAII3–an alternative way of RNA editing. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004, 29: 165-168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohrer C, Srinivasan G, Mandal D, Mallick B, Ghosh Z, Chakrabarti J, Rajbhandary UL: Identification and characterization of a tRNA decoding the rare AUA codon in Haloarcula marismortui. RNA. 2008, 14: 117-126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayley ST, Griffiths E: Codon assignments and fidelity of translation in a cell-free protein-synthesizing system from an extremely halophilic bacterium. Can J Biochem. 1968, 46: 937-944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosjean H, Constantinesco F, Foiret D, Benachenhou N: A novel enzymatic pathway leading to 1-methylinosine modification in Haloferax volcanii tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 4312-4319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bai Y, Fox DT, Lacy JA, Van Lanen SG, Iwata-Reuyl D: Hypermodification of tRNA in Thermophilic archaea. Cloning, overexpression, and characterization of tRNA-guanine transglycosylase from Methanococcus jannaschii. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 28731-28738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bachellerie J-P, Cavaillé J, Hüttenhofer A: The expanding snoRNA world. Biochimie. 2002, 84: 775-790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dennis PP, Omer A: Small non-coding RNAs in Archaea. Curr Opin Microb. 2005, 8: 685-694.Google Scholar
- Gagnon K, Zhang X, Maxwell E: The box C/D RNPs: evolutionary ancient nucleotide modification complexes. RNA and DNA Editing: Molecular mechanisms and their Integration into Biological Systems. Edited by: Smith H. 2008, John Wiley & Sons, 313-339.Google Scholar
- Purta E, van Vliet F, Tkaczuk KL, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Mori H, Droogmans L, Bujnicki JM: The yfhQ gene of Escherichia coli encodes a tRNA:Cm32/Um32 methyltransferase. BMC Mol Biol. 2006, 7: 23-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koonin E, Rudd KE: SpoU protein of Escherichia coli belongs to a new family of putative rRNA methylases. Nucl Acids Res. 1993, 21: 5519-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tkaczuk K, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Purta E, Bujnicki J: Structural and evolutionary bioinformatics of the SPOUT superfamily of methyltransferases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 73-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renalier M-H, Joseph N, Gaspin C, Thebault P, Mougin A: The Cm56 tRNA modification in archaea is catalyzed either by a specific 2'-O -methylase, or a C/D sRNP. RNA. 2005, 11: 1051-1063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clouet-d'Orval B, Gaspin C, Mougin A: Two different mechanisms for tRNA ribose methylation in Archaea: a short survey. Biochimie. 2005, 87: 889-895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker HF, Motorin Y, Planta RJ, Grosjean H: The yeast gene YNL292w encodes a pseudouridine synthase (Pus4) catalyzing the formation of psi55 in both mitochondrial and cytoplasmic tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4493-4499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nurse K, Wrzesinski J, Bakin A, Lane BG, Ofengand J: Purification, cloning, and properties of the tRNA psi 55 synthase from Escherichia coli. RNA. 1995, 1: 102-112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roovers M, Hale C, Tricot C, Terns MP, Terns RM, Grosjean H, Droogmans L: Formation of the conserved pseudouridine at position 55 in archaeal tRNA. Nucl Acids Res. 2006, 34: 4293-4301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gurha P, Joardar A, Chaurasia P, Gupta R: Differential roles of archaeal box H/ACA proteins in guide RNA-dependent and independent pseudouridine formation. RNA Biol. 2007, 4: 101-109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller S, Leclerc F, Behm-Ansmant I, Fourmann J-B, Charpentier B, Branlant C: Combined in silico and experimental identification of the Pyrococcus abyssi H/ACA sRNAs and their target sites in ribosomal RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 2459-2475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lecointe F, Simos G, Sauer A, Hurt EC, Motorin Y, Grosjean H: Characterization of yeast Protein Deg1 as pseudouridine synthase (Pus3) catalyzing the formation of Psi 38 and Psi 39 in tRNA anticodon loop. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 1316-1323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arps PJ, Marvel CC, Rubin BC, Tolan DA, Penhoet EE, Winkler ME: Structural features of the hisT operon of Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13: 5297-5315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD: Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3497-3500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamma T, Ferre-D'Amare AR: Pseudouridine Synthases. Chem Biol. 2006, 13: 1125-1135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson MJ, Byström AS: Transfer RNA modifications and modifying enzymes in S. cerevisiae. Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing, Topics in Current Genetics. Edited by: Grosjean H. 2005, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 12: 87-120.Google Scholar
- Motorin Y, Grosjean H: Multisite-specific tRNA:m5C-methyltransferase (Trm4) in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae : identification of the gene and substrate specificity of the enzyme. RNA. 1999, 5: 1105-1118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu XR, Gustafsson C, Ku J, Yu M, Santi DV: Identification of the 16S rRNA m5C967 methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 4053-4057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen NM, Douthwaite S: YebU is a m5C methyltransferase specific for 16 S rRNA nucleotide 1407. J Mol Biol. 2006, 359: 777-786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tscherne JS, Nurse K, Popienick P, Michel H, Sochacki M, Ofengand J: Purification, cloning, and characterization of the 16S RNA m5C967 methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 1884-1892.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auxilien S, El Khadali F, Rasmussen A, Douthwaite S, Grosjean H: Archease from Pyrococcus abyssi improves substrate specificity and solubility of a tRNA m5C methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 18711-18721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roovers M, Wouters J, Bujnicki JM, Tricot C, Stalon V, Grosjean H, Droogmans L: A primordial RNA modification enzyme: the case of tRNA (m1A) methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 465-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constantinesco F, Motorin Y, Grosjean H: Transfer RNA modification enzymes from Pyrococcus furiosus : detection of the enzymatic activities in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 1308-1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerber AP, Keller W: An adenosine deaminase that generates inosine at the wobble position of tRNAs. Science. 1999, 286: 1146-1149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerber A, Grosjean H, Melcher T, Keller W: Tad1p, a yeast tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase, is related to the mammalian pre-mRNA editing enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 4780-4789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auxilien S, Crain PF, Trewyn RW, Grosjean H: Mechanism, specificity and general properties of the yeast enzyme catalysing the formation of inosine 34 in the anticodon of transfer RNA. J Mol Biol. 1996, 262: 437-458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolf J, Gerber AP, Keller W: tadA, an essential tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 3841-3851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bycroft M, Hubbard TJP, Proctor M, Freund SMV, Murzin AG: The solution structure of the S1 RNA binding domain: a member of an ancient nucleic acid-binding fold. Cell. 1997, 88: 235-242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Urbonavicius J, Auxilien S, Walbott H, Trachana K, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B, Brochier-Armanet C, Grosjean H: Acquisition of a bacterial RumA-type tRNA(uracil-54, C5)-methyltransferase by Archaea through an ancient horizontal gene transfer. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 67: 323-335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takai K, Yokoyama S: Roles of 5-substituents of tRNA wobble uridines in the recognition of purine-ending codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 6383-6391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agris PF: Decoding the genome: a modified view. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 223-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leipuviene R, Qian Q, Björk GR: Formation of thiolated nucleosides Present in tRNA from Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium occurs in two principally distinct pathways. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 758-766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dewez M, Bauer F, Dieu M, Raes M, Vandenhaute J, Hermand D: The conserved Wobble uridine tRNA thiolase Ctu1-Ctu2 is required to maintain genome integrity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 5459-5464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Björk GR, Huang B, Persson OP, Byström AS: A conserved modified wobble nucleoside (mcm5s2U) in lysyl-tRNA is required for viability in yeast. RNA. 2007, 1245-1255.Google Scholar
- Kalhor HR, Clarke S: Novel methyltransferase for modified uridine residues at the wobble position of tRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 9283-9292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang BO, Johansson MJO, Byström AS: An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA. 2005, 11: 424-436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esberg A, Huang B, Johansson MJO, Byström AS: Elevated levels of two tRNA species bypass the requirement for Elongator complex in transcription and exocytosis. Mol Cell. 2006, 24: 139-148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sofia HJ, Chen G, Hetzler BG, Reyes-Spindola JF, Miller NE: Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 1097-1106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasvall SJ, Chen P, Björk GR: The modified wobble nucleoside uridine-5-oxyacetic acid in tRNAPro(cmo5UGG) promotes reading of all four proline codons in vivo. RNA. 2004, 10: 1662-1673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B: Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 2002, 418: 387-391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H: Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006, 2: 2006-0008.Google Scholar
- Ikeuchi Y, Kitachara K, Suzuki T: The RNA acetyltransferase driven by ATP hydrolysis synthesizes N4-acetylcytidine of tRNA anticodon. EMBO J. 2008, 27: 2194-2203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muramatsu T, Nishikawa K, Nemoto F, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T, Yokoyama S: Codon and amino-acid specificities of a transfer RNA are both converted by a single post-transcriptional modification. Nature. 1988, 336: 179-181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soma A, Ikeuchi Y, Kanemasa S, Kobayashi K, Ogasawara N, Ote T, Kato J, Watanabe K, Sekine Y, Suzuki T: An RNA-modifying enzyme that governs both the codon and amino acid specificities of isoleucine tRNA. Mol Cell. 2003, 12: 689-698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS: OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D363-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zago MA, Dennis PP, Omer AD: The expanding world of small RNAs in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 55: 1812-1828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gaspin C, Cavaillé J, Erauso G, Bachellerie JP: Archaeal homologs of eukaryotic methylation guide small nucleolar RNAs: lessons from the Pyrococcus genomes. J Mol Biol. 2000, 297: 895-906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Farrell HC, Pulicherla N, Desai PM, Rife JP: Recognition of a complex substrate by the KsgA/Dim1 family of enzymes has been conserved throughout evolution. RNA. 2006, 12: 725-733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caldas T, Binet E, Bouloc P, Costa A, Desgres J, Richarme G: The FtsJ/RrmJ heat shock protein of Escherichia coli Is a 23 S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 16414-16419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pintard L, Bujnicki JM, Lapeyre B, Bonnerot C: MRM2 encodes a novel yeast mitochondrial 21S rRNA methyltransferase. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1139-1147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lapeyre B, Purushothaman SK: Spb1p-directed formation of Gm2922 in the ribosome catalytic center occurs at a late processing stage. Mol Cell. 2004, 16: 663-669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonnerot C, Pintard L, Lutfalla G: Functional redundancy of Spb1p and a snR52-dependent mechanism for the 2'-O -Ribose methylation of a conserved rRNA position in Yeast. Mol Cell. 2003, 12: 1309-1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Droogmans L, Roovers M, Bujnicki JM, Tricot C, Hartsch T, Stalon V, Grosjean H: Cloning and characterization of tRNA (m1A58) methyltransferase (TrmI) from Thermus thermophilus HB27, a protein required for cell growth at extreme temperatures. Nucl Acids Res. 2003, 31: 2148-2156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozanick S, Krecic A, Andersland J, Anderson JT: The bipartite structure of the tRNA m1A58 methyltransferase from S. cerevisiae is conserved in humans. RNA. 2005, 11: 1281-1290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anantharaman V, Koonin EV, Aravind L: TRAM, a predicted RNA-binding domain, common to tRNA uracil methylation and adenine thiolation enzymes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 197: 215-221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozhdestvensky TS, Tang TH, Tchirkova IV, Brosius J, Bachellerie J-P, Huttenhofer A: Binding of L7Ae protein to the K-turn of archaeal snoRNAs: a shared RNA binding motif for C/D and H/ACA box snoRNAs in Archaea. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 869-877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu M, Novotny GW, Douthwaite S: Methylation of 23S rRNA nucleotide G745 is a secondary function of the RlmAI methyltransferase. RNA. 2004, 10: 1713-1720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agarwalla S, LaPorte S, Liu L, Finer-Moore J, Stroud RM, Santi DV: A Novel dCMP methylase by engineering Thymidylate Synthase. Biochemistry. 1997, 36: 15909-15917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bujnicki JM, Feder M, Ayres CL, Redman KL: Sequence-structure-function studies of tRNA:m5C methyltransferase Trm4p and its relationship to DNA:m5C and RNA:m5U methyltransferases. Nucl Acids Res. 2004, 32: 2453-2463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basturea GN, Rudd KE, Deutscher MP: Identification and characterization of RsmE, the founding member of a new RNA base methyltransferase family. RNA. 2006, 12: 426-434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y-G, Yao M, Yong Z, Tanaka I: Crystal structure of the putative RNA methyltransferase PH1948 from Pyrococcus horikoshii, in complex with the copurified S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine. Proteins. 2005, 61: 1141-1145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schluckebier G, Zhong P, Stewart KD, Kavanaugh TJ, Abad-Zapatero C: The 2.2 Å structure of the rRNA methyltransferase ErmC' and its complexes with cofactor and cofactor analogs: implications for the reaction mechanism. J Mol Biol. 1999, 289: 277-291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aravind L, Koonin EV: Novel predicted RNA-binding domains associated with the translation machinery. J Mol Evol. 1999, 48: 291-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleischer TC, Weaver CM, McAfee KJ, Jennings JL, Link AJ: Systematic identification and functional screens of uncharacterized proteins associated with eukaryotic ribosomal complexes. Genes Dev. 2006, 20: 1294-1307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oren A: Biodiversity in highly saline environments. Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. Edited by: Gerday C, Glansdorff N. 2007, Washington DC: ASM Press, 223-231.Google Scholar
- Ginzburg M, Sachs L, Ginzburg BZ: Ion Metabolism in a Halobacterium : I. Influence of age of culture on intracellular concentrations. J Gen Physiol. 1970, 55: 187-207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holzle A, Fischer S, Heyer R, Schutz S, Zacharias M, Walther P, Allers T, Marchfelder A: Maturation of the 5S rRNA 5' end is catalyzed in vitro by the endonuclease tRNase Z in the archaeon H. volcanii. RNA. 2008, 14: 928-937.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vellieux F, Madern D, Zaccai G, Ebel C: Molecular adaptation to high salt. Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. Edited by: Gerday C, Glansdorff N. 2007, Washington DC: ASM press, 240-253.Google Scholar
- Marck C, Kachouri-Lafond R, Lafontaine I, Westhof E, Dujon B, Grosjean H: The RNA polymerase III-dependent family of genes in hemiascomycetes: comparative RNomics, decoding strategies, transcription and evolutionary implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 1816-1835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stengl B, Reuter K, Klebe G: Mechanism and substrate specificity of tRNA-Guanine transglycosylases (TGTs): tRNA-modifying enzymes from the three different kingdoms of life share a common catalytic mechanism. ChemBioChem. 2005, 6: 1926-1939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dennis PP, Omer A, Lowe T: A guided tour: small RNA function in Archaea. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 40: 509-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosjean H, Oshima K: How nucleic acids cope with high temperature. Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. Edited by: Gerday C, Glansdorff N. 2007, Washington DC: ASM press, 39-56.Google Scholar
- Uzawa T, Hamasaki N, Oshima T: Effects of novel polyamines on cell-free polypeptide synthesis catalyzed by Thermus thermophilus HB8 Extract. J Biochem (Tokyo). 1993, 114: 478-486.Google Scholar
- Uzawa T, Yamagishi A, Nishikawa K, Oshima T: Effects of unusual polyamines on phenylalanyl-tRNA formation. J Biochem (Tokyo). 1994, 115: 830-832.Google Scholar
- Ban N, Nissen P, Hansen J, Moore PB, Steitz TA: The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution. Science. 2000, 289: 905-920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider KL, Pollard KS, Baertsch R, Pohl A, Lowe TM: The UCSC archaeal genome browser. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D407-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997, 25: 955-964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Overbeek R, Begley T, Butler RM, Choudhuri JV, Chuang HY, Cohoon M, de Crécy-Lagard V, Diaz N, Disz T, Edwards R: The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 5691-5702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alm EJ, Huang KH, Price MN, Koche RP, Keller K, Dubchak IL, Arkin AP: The MicrobesOnline Web site for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2005, 15: 1015-1022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNeil LK, Reich C, Aziz RK, Bartels D, Cohoon M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Hwang K, Kubal M: The National Microbial Pathogen Database Resource (NMPDR): a genomics platform based on subsystem annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D347-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov R, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Kiryutin B, Koonin E, Krylov D, Mazumder R, Mekhedov S, Nikolskaya A: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 41-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uchiyama I: MBGD: a platform for microbial comparative genomics based on the automated construction of orthologous groups. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D343-346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, Chen IMA, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K: The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36: D528-533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCloskey JA, Crain PF: The RNA modification database–1998. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 196-197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thebault P, de Givry S, Schiex T, Gaspin C: Searching RNA motifs and their intermolecular contacts with constraint networks. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2074-2080.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller S, Charpentier B, Branlant C, Leclerc F, Jonatha MG: A dedicated computational approach for the identification of Archaeal H/ACA sRNAs. Methods Enzymol. 2007, Academic Press, 425: 355-387.Google Scholar
- Armengaud J, Urbonavicius J, Fernandez B, Chaussinand G, Bujnicki JM, Grosjean H: N2-methylation of guanosine at position 10 in tRNA is catalyzed by a THUMP domain-containing, S-Adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase, conserved in Archaea and Eukaryota. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 37142-37152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaya Y, Ofengand J: A novel unanticipated type of pseudouridine synthase with homologs in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. RNA. 2003, 9: 711-721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constantinesco F, Motorin Y, Grosjean H: Characterisation and enzymatic properties of tRNA(guanine 26, N 2,N 2)-dimethyltransferase (Trm1p) from Pyrococcus furiosus. J Mol Biol. 1999, 291: 375-392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalhor HR, Penjwini M, Clarke S: A novel methyltransferase required for the formation of the hypermodified nucleoside wybutosine in eucaryotic tRNA. Bioch Bioph Res Com. 2005, 334: 433-440.Google Scholar
- El Yacoubi B, Agnelli F, Williamson J, Tabacs J, J L, de Crécy Lagard V, Swairjo MA: Biosynthesis of tRNA anticodon loop modification threonylcarbamoyl adenosine and role in ribosome function. 22nd International tRNA workshop: 2007. 2007, Uppsala, Sweden, 79-Google Scholar
- Christian T, Evilia C, Williams S, Hou Y-M: Distinct origins of tRNA(m1G37) methyltransferase. J Mol Biol. 2004, 339: 707-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker DL, Youssef OA, Chastkofsky MIR, Dy DA, Terns RM, Terns MP: RNA-Guided RNA modification: functional organization of the archaeal H/ACA RNP. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 1238-1248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Omer AD, Ziesche S, Ebhardt H, Dennis PP: In vitro reconstitution and activity of a C/D box methylation guide ribonucleoprotein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 5289-5294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.