Open Access

Toxicogenomic response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ortho-phenylphenol

  • Chantal W Nde1,
  • Hyeung-Jin Jang1,
  • Freshteh Toghrol2Email author and
  • William E Bentley1
BMC Genomics20089:473

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-473

Received: 29 April 2008

Accepted: 10 October 2008

Published: 10 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is the most common opportunistic pathogen implicated in nosocomial infections and in chronic lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. Ortho-phenylphenol (OPP) is an antimicrobial agent used as an active ingredient in several EPA registered disinfectants. Despite its widespread use, there is a paucity of information on its target molecular pathways and the cellular responses that it elucidates in bacteria in general and in P. aeruginosa in particular. An understanding of the OPP-driven gene regulation and cellular response it elicits will facilitate more effective utilization of this antimicrobial and possibly lead to the development of more effective disinfectant treatments.

Results

Herein, we performed a genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the cellular responses of P. aeruginosa exposed to 0.82 mM OPP for 20 and 60 minutes. Our data indicated that OPP upregulated the transcription of genes encoding ribosomal, virulence and membrane transport proteins after both treatment times. After 20 minutes of exposure to 0.82 mM OPP, genes involved in the exhibition of swarming motility and anaerobic respiration were upregulated. After 60 minutes of OPP treatment, the transcription of genes involved in amino acid and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis were upregulated. Further, the transcription of the ribosome modulation factor (rmf) and an alternative sigma factor (rpo S) of RNA polymerase were downregulated after both treatment times.

Conclusion

Results from this study indicate that after 20 minutes of exposure to OPP, genes that have been linked to the exhibition of anaerobic respiration and swarming motility were upregulated. This study also suggests that the downregulation of the rmf and rpoS genes may be indicative of the mechanism by which OPP causes decreases in cell viability in P. aeruginosa. Consequently, a protective response involving the upregulation of translation leading to the increased synthesis of membrane related proteins and virulence proteins is possibly induced after both treatment times. In addition, cell wall modification may occur due to the increased synthesis of lipopolysaccharide after 60 minutes exposure to OPP. This gene expression profile can now be utilized for a better understanding of the target cellular pathways of OPP in P. aeruginosa and how this organism develops resistance to OPP.

Background

Hospital-acquired infections caused by opportunistic pathogens present a serious threat to public health. Nosocomial infections are estimated to occur in 5% of all acute-care hospitalizations and in more than 2 million cases each year [1]. P. aeruginosa is the most common opportunistic pathogen responsible for hospital acquired burn wound infections, urinary tract infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia [25]. In cystic fibrosis patients, P. aeruginosa is implicated in chronic lung infections, leading to high rates of illness and death [6]. In the increasing AIDS population, 50% of deaths have been linked P. aeruginosa bacteremia [7]. The increasing prevalence of nosocomial infections has been associated to the growing problem of antimicrobial and detergent-resistant pathogens [8, 9]. As such, proper use of effective disinfecting strategies in hospitals is necessary to abate this growing problem [10].

Ortho-phenyphenol is used as a fungicide and as an antibacterial agent in a wide variety of settings. OPP is used as a hospital disinfectant, and as a fungicide and disinfectant for wood preservation, the treatment of vegetables and citrus fruits and textile production [11, 12]. Results from toxicological studies indicate that OPP administered in diet, leads to the formation of tumors in the urinary bladder of rats [13]. OPP has also been reported to cause sister-chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1 cells) [14].

Despite the aforementioned detrimental effects of OPP and its many uses to combat microbial contamination, to our knowledge, the mechanism of action of OPP on bacterial pathogens has not been elucidated. Moreover, the use of OPP as a hospital disinfectant necessitates an understanding of the cellular functions that it affects in different pathogenic bacteria. This will facilitate the determination of its mode of action such that it can be more effectively utilized. Further, such information will expedite the development of efficient antimicrobials which target specific pathogenic bacteria and exert nominal effects on other species. In previous studies, whole genome microarrays have been successfully used to analyze the global transcriptomic response of P. aeruginosa to different antimicrobials. From these studies, specific cellular functions affected by the application of these antimicrobials were elucidated through the identification of signature genes that were up or downregulated [1519].

To our knowledge, for the first time, we investigated the genome-wide changes in P. aeruginosa gene transcription upon exposure to 0.82 mM OPP for 20 and 60 minutes using Affymetrix P. aeruginosa GeneChip arrays. Our findings show that: (i) the transcription of genes encoding ribosomal, virulence and membrane proteins (including membrane transport systems) were upregulated after 20 and 60 minutes (ii) the transcription of genes that may allow transient switches to anaerobic respiration and swarming motility as stress responses were upregulated after 20 minutes (iii) after 60 minutes, amino acid anabolism and lipopolysaccharide synthesis were upregulated. (iv) after both 20 and 60 minutes of OPP treatment, the transcription of the genes encoding the ribosome modulation factor and the alternative sigma factor, RpoS were significantly downregulated.

Results and discussion

Growth inhibition of P. aeruginosa by OPP

In order to determine a suitable sublethal concentration of OPP that will produce strong growth inhibition, P. aeruginosa was exposed to six concentrations of OPP dissolved in DMSO (0.58, 0.82, 0.94, 0.99, 1.05 and 1.18 mM), and growth inhibition was monitored at intervals of 10 minutes for 60 minutes. Note that the concentration of OPP that inhibits 90% of P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC90) has been reported to be 2000 mg/L (1.18 mM) [20]. In figure 1, the highest concentration of OPP used (1.18 mM) produced marked growth inhibition. Therefore, a lower sublethal concentration of 0.82 mM was selected as the test concentration since this concentration caused a non-drastic sublethal growth inhibition as seen in figure 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-9-473/MediaObjects/12864_2008_Article_1666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Growth inhibition of P. aeruginosa treated with orthophenylphenol (OPP). Cell density was monitored as the OD600 in ten minute intervals. The OPP concentrations were as follows: 0 mM control with DMSO (filled square), 0.58 mM (filled triangle), 0.82 mM (inverted filled triangle), 0.94 mM (filled diamond), 0.99 mM (filled circle), 1.05 mM (empty square), 1.18 mM (empty triangle). Each data point was derived as the average of three separate experiments and the error bars represent the standard deviation obtained.

Changes in the transcriptional profiles of P. aeruginosa in response to OPP

Four separate microarray experiments were performed in the absence (control) and in the presence (experimental) of 0.82 mM OPP. In order to investigate early and late changes in transcription in response to OPP, RNA was isolated after 20 and 60 minutes exposure to 0.82 mM OPP. To determine which genes showed significant changes in transcript level in response to OPP, the following criteria were applied: (i) the p-value for a Mann-Whitney test should be less than 0.05, (ii) an absolute fold change in transcript level should be equal to or greater than 2 (iii) a gene should have a present or marginal call (Affymetrix, Inc.) from 50% or more replicates on both experimental and control replicate sets. After a one-way ANOVA was performed, 1012 out of the 5900 genes that make up the P. aeruginosa genome were found to be statistically significant. Further analysis revealed that a total of 509 genes showed statistically marked upregulation (≥ 2-fold) or downregulation (≤ 2-fold) after 20 minutes and after 60 minutes exposure to OPP. The expression levels of the 5900 genes in the P. aeruginosa genome obtained from control experiments and after treatment with OPP (20 and 60 minutes) have been deposited in NCBI's gene Expression Omnibus [21] and can be accessed through the GEO series accession number: GSE10604 [22] (additional file 1).

Functional classification of upregulated and downregulated genes

In order to relate the up and downregulated genes to their functions, the 509 statistically significant genes were classified into different functional classes. Functional classes were obtained from the P. aeruginosa Community Annotation Project [23, 24]. Figure 2 illustrates the grouping of up and down regulated genes at 20 and 60 minutes into different functional classes and the total number of genes in each class for the two treatment times. Note that a total of 137 genes were classified as "hypothetical, unclassified, unknown".
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-9-473/MediaObjects/12864_2008_Article_1666_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Functional classification of statistically significant upregulated (filled bars) and downregulated (empty bars) genes after 20 minutes and 60 minutes exposure to 0.82 mM OPP. The numbers in parentheses indicate the total number of genes for each functional class in both groups (a total of 509 genes).

Figure 2 illustrates that in general at 60 minutes, there were more upregulated and downregulated genes in the functional classes, when compared to 20 minutes. In particular, genes belonging to the functional classes of "adaptation and protection", amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism", "biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups and carriers", "carbon compound catabolism", "cell division", "cell wall/LPS/capsule", "central intermediary metabolism", "chaperones and heat shock proteins", "DNA replication, recombination and repair", "energy metabolism", "fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism", "membrane proteins", "nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism", "putative enzymes", "transcription", "transcriptional regulators", "translation, post-translational modification, degradation", and "transport of small molecules contained significantly more upregulated genes at 60 minutes.

Among the downregulated genes, the functional classes of: "adaptation and protection", "amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism", "carbon compound catabolism" and "energy metabolism" contained significantly more downregulated genes at 60 minutes compared to 20 minutes. The marked differences between the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes after 20 minutes exposure compared to 60 minutes of treatment may be related to the growth inhibition observed following exposure to OPP.

Grouping of functionally classified up and down regulated genes

To further analyze the 509 upregulated and downregulated genes, we removed the 137 genes belonging to the class designated as "hypothetical, unclassified, unknown". The remaining 372 genes were placed in six groups based on their transcription directions. Figure 3 illustrates the six different groups and the total number of genes in each group. Group I contains genes that were upregulated after 20 and 60 minutes. Group II is made up of genes that were upregulated after 20 minutes only. Group III contains genes that were downregulated upon 20 minutes of exposure to OPP. Group IV contains genes that were upregulated after 60 minutes only. Group V is made up of genes that were downregulated only after 60 minutes exposure to OPP. Group VI contains genes that were downregulated after both 20 and 60 minutes exposure to OPP. All of the genes discussed in this report can be found in additional file 2. However, for clarity and to facilitate the reading of this report, the genes discussed below in the six groups are indicated in table 1.
Table 1

List of significantly up or downregulated P. aeruginosa genes that are discussed in this report

Affymetrix ORF #

Probe ID

a20 minutes

a60 minutes

Description

Symbol

Functional class

  

bFold change

P value

bFold change

P value

   

Group I: Upregulation (20 min) – Upregulation (60 min)

PA1964_at

PA1964

2.029

0.0112

2.381

0.0112

probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter

 

Transport of small molecules

PA2760_at

PA2760

2.152

0.0416

2.94

0.0416

probable outer membrane protein precursor

 

Transport of small molecules

PA4687_hitA_at

PA4687

2.219

0.00808

2.069

0.00808

ferric iron-binding periplasmic protein HitA

hit A

Transport of small molecules

PA2743_infC_at

PA2743

2.044

0.000327

2.634

0.000327

translation initiation factor IF-3

inf C

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA2619_infA_at

PA2619

2.14

0.000526

3.644

0.000526

translation initiation factor

inf A

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4266_fusA1_at

PA4266

2.18

0.012

3.88

0.012

elongation factor G

fus A1

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA3655_tsf_at

PA3655

2.197

0.017

5.495

0.017

elongation factor Ts

tsf

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4665_prfA_at

PA4665

2.426

0.00398

2.774

0.00398

peptide chain release factor 1

prf A

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4273_rplA_at

PA4273

2.725

0.0349

6.018

0.0349

50S ribosomal protein L1

rpl A

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA3656_rpsB_at

PA3656

2.543

0.00953

7.267

0.00953

30S ribosomal protein S2

rps B

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4744_infB_at

PA4744

2.783

0.0134

3.826

0.0134

translation initiation factor IF-2

inf B

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4934_rpsR_at

PA4934

2.894

0.000276

6.619

0.000276

30S ribosomal protein S18

rps R

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4255_rpmC_at

PA4255

2.927

0.00331

6.655

0.00331

50S ribosomal protein L29

rpm C

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4528_pilD_at

PA4528

2.144

0.014

2.65

0.014

type 4 prepilin peptidase PilD

pil D

Motility & Attachment

PA0408_pilG_at

PA0408

2.294

0.0144

4.026

0.0144

twitching motility protein PilG

pil G

Chemotaxis

PA5041_pilP_at

PA5041

2.169

0.00817

2.232

0.00817

type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilP

pil P

Motility & Attachment

PA0410_pilI_at

PA0024

2.188

0.0484

2.267

0.0484

twitching motility protein PilI

pil I

Motility & Attachment

PA5042_pilO_at

PA5042

2.26

0.000345

2.056

0.000345

type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilO

pil O

Motility & Attachment

PA4527_pilC_at

PA4527

2.27

0.00205

2.678

0.00205

still frameshift type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilC

pil C

Motility & Attachment

PA5043_pilN_at

PA5043

2.34

0.000628

2.914

0.000628

type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilN

pil N

Motility & Attachment

PA5044_pilM_at

PA5044

2.893

0.00702

3.12

0.00702

type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilM

pil M

Motility & Attachment

PA4688_hitB_at

PA4688

2.282

0.0261

2.513

0.0261

iron (III)-transport system permease HitB

hit B

Membrane proteins

PA4747_secG_at

PA4747

2.294

0.00628

3.795

0.00628

secretion protein SecG

sec G

Membrane proteins

PA4243_secY_at

PA4243

2.914

9.26E-05

6.799

9.26E-05

secretion protein SecY

sec Y

Membrane proteins

PA4276_secE_at

PA4276

2.274

2.07E-05

4.198

2.07E-05

secretion protein SecE

sec E

Protein secretion/export apparatus

PA2968_fabD_at

PA2968

2.137

0.0131

3.506

0.0131

malonyl-CoA-[acyl-carrier-protein] transacylase

fab D

Fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism

PA1609_fabB_at

PA1609

2.373

0.0147

2.855

0.0147

beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase I

fab B

Fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism

PA2967_fabG_at

PA2967

2.387

0.00109

3.416

0.00109

3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase

fab G

Fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism

PA1610_fabA_at

PA1610

2.864

0.00295

4.071

0.00295

beta-hydroxydecanoyl-ACP dehydrase

fab A

Fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism

PA3645_fabZ_at

PA3645

2.854

2.25E-05

4.671

2.25E-05

(3R)-hydroxymyristoyl-[acyl carrier protein] dehydratase

fab Z

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA5556_atpA_at

PA5556

2.202

0.00136

3.907

0.00136

ATP synthase alpha chain

atp A

Energy metabolism

PA5491_at

PA5491

2.354

0.0049

2.854

0.0049

probable cytochrome

 

Energy metabolism

PA5561_atpI_at

PA5561

2.558

0.0015

2.542

0.0015

ATP synthase protein I

atp I

Energy metabolism

PA3818_at

PA4263

2.746

0.00537

5.447

0.00537

extragenic suppressor protein SuhB

Suh B

Adaptation, protection

PA4743_rbfA_at

PA4743

2.824

0.0177

4.063

0.0177

ribosome-binding factor A

rbf A

Adaptation, protection

PA5117_typA_at

PA5117

3.136

0.000343

5.723

0.000343

regulatory protein TypA

Typ A

Adaptation, protection

Group II: Upregulation (20 min) – No change (60 min)

PA0524_norB_at

PA0524

3.869

0.0456

  

nitric-oxide reductase subunit B

nor B

Energy metabolism

PA3479_rhlA_at

PA3479

2.376

0.0364

  

rhamnosyltransferase chain A

rhl A

Secreted Factors (toxins, enzymes, alginate)

PA0177_at

PA0177

2.683

0.00294

  

probable purine-binding chemotaxis protein

 

Adaptation, protection

Group III: Downregulation (20 min) – No change (60 min)

PA2193_hcnA_at

PA2193

-2.268

0.0324

  

hydrogen cyanide synthase HcnA

hcn A

Central intermediary metabolism

PA2194_hcnB_at

PA2194

-2.762

0.018

  

hydrogen cyanide synthase HcnB

hcn B

Central intermediary metabolism

PA2195_hcnC_at

PA2195

-2.183

0.0437

  

hydrogen cyanide synthase HcnC

hcn C

Central intermediary metabolism

PA4385_groEL_at

PA4385

-2.16

0.00513

  

GroEL protein

gro EL

Chaperones & heat shock proteins

PA4542_clpB_at

PA4542

-2.77

0.00253

  

ClpB protein

clp B

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

Group IV: No change(20 min) – Upregulation(60 min)

PA4272_rplJ_at

PA4272

  

5.918

0.00886

50S ribosomal protein L10

rpl J

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4271_rplL_at

PA4271

  

5.898

0.00319

50S ribosomal protein L17/L12

rpl L

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA2740_pheS_at

PA2740

  

3.323

0.000548

phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, alpha-subunit

phe S

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4240_rpsK_at

PA4240

  

3.283

0.0292

30S ribosomal protein S11

rps K

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA4267_rpsG_at

PA4267

  

3.104

0.0138

30S ribosomal protein S7

rps G

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA2739_pheT_at

PA2739

  

2.142

0.0375

phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, beta subunit

phe T

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA3987_leuS_at

PA3987

  

2.632

0.0216

leucyl-tRNA synthetase

leu S

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA0009_glyQ_at

PA0009

  

2.568

0.000361

glycyl-tRNA synthetase alpha chain

gly Q

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA3525_argG_at

PA3525

  

2.45

0.0411

argininosuccinate synthase

arg G

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA3167_serC_at

PA3167

  

2.345

0.0396

3-phosphoserine aminotransferase

ser C

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA0904_lysC_at

PA0904

  

2.337

0.00528

aspartate kinase alpha and beta chain

lys C

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5263_argH_at

PA5263

  

2.29

0.00853

argininosuccinate lyase

arg H

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA4007_proA_at

PA4007

  

2.282

0.0231

gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase

pro A

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5277_lysA_at

PA5277

  

2.247

0.0334

diaminopimelate decarboxylase

lys A

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5143_hisB_at

PA5143

  

2.246

0.00461

imidazoleglycerol-phosphate dehydratase

his B

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5039_aroK_at

PA5039

  

2.234

0.013

shikimate kinase

aro K

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA0018_fmt_at

PA0018

  

2.222

0.0137

methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase

fmt

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5067_hisE_at

PA5067

  

2.212

0.00214

phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphohydrolase

his E

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA3482_metG_at

PA3482

  

2.043

0.0312

methionyl-tRNA synthetase

met G

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5119_glnA_at

PA5119

  

2.038

0.0442

glutamine synthetase

gln A

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA4439_trpS_at

PA4439

  

2.002

0.0155

tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase

trp S

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA0903_alaS_at

PA0903

  

2.099

0.0102

alanyl-tRNA synthetase

ala S

Transcription, RNA processing and degradation

PA4602_glyA3_at

PA4602

  

3.347

2.83E-05

serine hydroxymethyltransferase

gly A3

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA0971_tolA_at

PA0971

  

2.249

0.000381

TolA protein

tol A

Transport of small molecules

PA5479_gltP_at

PA5479

  

2.413

0.00978

proton-glutamate symporter

glt P

Membrane proteins

PA3821_secD_at

PA3821

  

3.516

0.00324

secretion protein SecD

sec D

Membrane proteins

PA3820_secF_at

PA3820

  

2.206

0.0411

secretion protein sec F Protein secretion

sec F

Protein secretion/export apparatus

PA5070_tatC_at

PA5070

  

2.312

0.0209

transport protein TatC

tat C

Membrane proteins

PA0973_oprL_at

PA0973

  

2.281

0.00672

Peptidoglycan associated lipoprotein OprL precursor

opr L

Membrane proteins

PA0280_cysA_at

PA0280

  

2.018

0.0139

sulfate transport protein CysA

cys A

Transport of small molecules

PA5217_at

PA5217

  

2.141

0.00709

probable binding protein component of ABC iron transporter

 

Transport of small molecules

PA0295_at

PA0295

  

2.643

0.0147

probable periplasmic polyamine binding protein

 

Transport of small molecules

PA4461_at

PA4461

  

2.24

0.00116

probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter

 

Transport of small molecules

PA5503_at

PA5503

  

2.229

0.000446

probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter

 

Transport of small molecules

PA4450_murA_at

PA4450

  

2.855

0.00044

UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 1-carboxyvinyltransferase

mur A

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA3644_lpxA_at

PA3644

  

2.83

0.00038

UDP-N-acetylglucosamine acyltransferase

lpx A

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA5276_lppL_i_at

PA5276

  

2.786

0.0149

Lipopeptide LppL precursor

lpp L

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA3643_lpxB_at

PA3643

  

2.561

0.0247

lipid A-disaccharide synthase

lpx B

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA5012_waaF_at

PA5012

  

2.092

0.00978

heptosyltransferase II

waa F

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA3337_rfaD_at

PA3337

  

3.397

0.0498

ADP-L-glycero-D-mannoheptose 6-epimerase

rfa D

Cell wall/LPS/capsule

PA5129_grx_at

PA5129

  

3.855

0.0334

glutaredoxin

grx

Energy metabolism

PA5555_atpG_at

PA5555

  

3.527

0.0287

ATP synthase gamma chain

atp G

Energy metabolism

PA5554_atpD_at

PA5554

  

3.011

0.00384

ATP synthase beta chain

atp D

Energy metabolism

PA3621_fdxA_at

PA3621

  

3.01

0.0042

ferredoxin I

fdx A

Energy metabolism

PA5559_atpE_at

PA5559

  

2.734

0.0205

atp synthase C chain

atp E

Energy metabolism

PA5560_atpB_at

PA5560

  

2.433

0.0148

ATP synthase A chain

atp B

Energy metabolism

PA2995_nqrE_at

PA2995

  

2.216

0.00617

Na+-translocating NADH:quinone oxidoreductase subunit Nqr5

nqr E

Energy metabolism

PA5553_atpC_at

PA5553

  

2.175

0.00502

ATP synthase epsilon chain

atp C

Energy metabolism

PA0362_fdx1_at

PA0362

  

2.125

0.000346

ferredoxin [4Fe-4S]

fdx 1

Energy metabolism

PA3527_pyrC_at

PA3527

  

2.218

0.0211

dihydroorotase

pyr C

Nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism

PA5331_pyrE_at

PA5331

  

2.156

0.0166

orotate phosphoribosyltransferase

pyr E

Nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism

PA3654_pyrH_at

PA3654

  

2.434

0.0212

uridylate kinase

pyr H

Nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism

PA3763_purL_at

PA3763

  

2.279

0.00792

phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase

pur L

Nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism

Group V: No change(20 min) – Downregulation(60 min)

PA1174_napA_at

PA1174

  

-3.425

0.0251

periplasmic nitrate reductase protein NapA

nap A

Energy metabolism

PA1175_napD_at

PA1175

  

-2.949

0.0134

NapD protein of periplasmic nitrate reductase

nap D

Energy metabolism

PA1176_napF_at

PA1176

  

-2.949

0.024

ferredoxin protein NapF

nap F

Energy metabolism

PA1173_napB_at

PA1173

  

-3.077

0.00344

cytochrome c-type protein NapB precursor

nap B

Energy metabolism

PA2248_bkdA2_at

PA2248

  

-5.076

0.0072

2-oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase (beta subunit)

bkd A2

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA2247_bkdA1_at

PA2247

  

-9.434

0.00376

2-oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase (alpha subunit)

bkd A1

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

PA2250_lpdV_at

PA2250

  

-3.497

0.00576

lipoamide dehydrogenase-Val

lpd V

Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism

Group VI: Downregulation (20 min) – Downregulation (60 min)

PA3049_rmf_at

PA3049

-6.25

0.000723

-25.907

0.000723

ribosome modulation factor

rmf

Translation, post-translational modification, degradation

PA3622_rpoS_at

PA3622

-2.653

0.00961

-2.967

0.00961

sigma factor RpoS

rpo S

Transcriptional regulators

PA4762_grpE_at

PA4762

-2.915

0.00501

-0.479

0.00501

heat shock protein GrpE

grp E

DNA replication, recombination, modification and repair

PA5054_hslU_at

PA5054

-3.226

0.000316

-0.428

0.000316

heat shock protein HslU

hsl U

Chaperones & heat shock proteins

PA5053_hslV_at

PA5053

-2.597

0.00113

-0.352

0.00113

heat shock protein HslV

hsl V

Chaperones & heat shock proteins

PA1596_htpG_at

PA1596

-2.695

0.00706

-0.434

0.00706

heat shock protein HtpG

htp G

Chaperones & heat shock proteins

Genes are categorized by their transcription patterns and related functions. The microarray results are the mean of four replicates of each gene.

aThe microarray results are the mean of four replicates of each gene.

bThe fold change is a positive number when the expression level in the experiment increased compared to the control and is a negative number when the expression level in the experiment decreased.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-9-473/MediaObjects/12864_2008_Article_1666_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Classification of differentially regulated 372 genes into six groups based on their transcription directions after 20 and 60 minutes exposure to OPP. Note that genes belonging to the functional class "hypothetical, unclassified, unknown" (137 genes) are not represented in this figure. Filled bars indicate upregulation either after one or both treatment times. Empty bars indicate downregulation either after one or both treatment times. Group I is made up of genes upregulated after both exposure times. Group II contains genes upregulated at 20 minutes, with no significant changes after 60 minute exposure. Group III consists of genes downregulated after 20 minutes, with no significant changes upon 60 minutes of treatment. Group IV is made up of genes that were upregulated in response to 60 minutes of treatment. Group V is made up of genes that were downregulated upon 60 minutes of treatment. Group VI is made up of genes that were downregulated upon both exposure times.

Group I: genes upregulated at 20 and 60 minutes exposure

Group 1 consisted of genes that were induced both at 20 and 60 minutes exposure to OPP (additional file 2). The most distinctive functional class in this group was "translation, post-translational modification and degradation" which contained 45 genes (additional file 2). This functional class contained several 30 and 50S ribosomal proteins. The two most upregulated 30 and 50S ribosomal proteins are indicated on table 1. A complete list of ribosomal proteins in this group can be found in additional file 2. Group 1 also contained genes coding for translation initiation factors: PA2619, PA4744 and PA 2743 (inf A, inf B and inf C), elongation factors G and Ts: PA4266, PA3655 (fus A1, tsf) and peptide chain release factor: (prf A) PA4665 (table 1). The upregulation of these genes after both 20 and 60 minutes suggests that protein synthesis is affected in P. aeruginosa upon exposure to OPP and even after prolonged exposure (60 minutes). This may reflect a cellular protective response, whereby proteins involved in stress response are synthesized. The upregulation of the cold shock protein: PA4743 (rbf A) and the heat shock protein: PA4263 (suh B) which are involved in stress response supports this hypothesis. The observed upregulation of translation may also indicate an increase in the synthesis of virulence factors, which can be produced in response to environmental stress. Previous studies have suggested that the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus is stimulated as a protective response against antimicrobial treatments [25, 26]. In line with this hypothesis was the upregulation of PA5117 (typ A), which has been suggested to be relevant for pathogenesis in Escherichia coli when it is tyrosine phosphorylated [27].

Among the genes in the functional class of "membrane proteins" in this group, we observed three proteins of the SecY system: PA4243 (sec Y), PA4276 (sec E) and PA4747 sec G) were upregulated. In gram negative bacteria, the Sec system is utilized for the secretion of degradative enzymes, virulence factors, toxins and proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane and for the insertion of proteins into the cytoplasmic membrane [28], allowing for growth and survival. The concomitant upregulation of genes involved in the Sec system and genes involved in translation is possibly indicative of the transport of synthesized proteins across the cell membrane.

Concurrent with the induction of genes of the Sec system was the upregulation of genes involved in membrane associated transport of small molecules notably, PA4687: ferric iron-binding periplasmic protein (hit A), PA1964: probabale ATP-binding component of ABC transporter, PA2760: probable outer membrane protein precursor and PA4688: Iron III-transport system permease (hit B). These results are in agreement with those of a recent study that demonstrated that the hit A and hit B genes were 2- to 8-fold upregulated in P. aeruginosa in response to a two hour exposure to 10 mM hydrogen peroxide [17]. HitA, HitB and HitC (a nucleotide binding protein) encoded by the hit ABC operon facilitate iron acquisition from the periplasm [29]. In contrast, a previous study indicated that the hit AB genes were downregulated approximately 7- and 6- fold in P. aeruginosa treated with sodium hypochlorite for 20 minutes [18]. Therefore the upregulation of hit A (ferric iron-binding periplasmic protein) and hit B (Iron III-transport system permease) in this study is suggestive of active iron uptake, which is essential for bacterial growth and an important determinant of bacterial virulence [29].

It is worth noting that eight type IV pilus assembly proteins belonged to this group including pil C, D, G, I, M, N, O and P. Type IV pili have been implicated in the pathogenicity of gram negative bacteria, and mediate cellular functions such as twitching motility, host-cell adhesion and cell signaling [30]. The expression of type IV pili is necessary for colonization and maturation of P. aeruginosa biofilms on a variety of surfaces [31]. Considering that the cellular functions noted above generally mediate virulence and cell survival, it is therefore possible that the upregulation of these genes may be associated with protection and concomitant survival of P. aeruginosa when treated with OPP.

Five genes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis (fab A, B, D, G and Z) were also categorized under group I. A previous study that investigated the proteomic response of P. putida to phenol-induced stress noted that several enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, including FabB and FabH2 were upregulated approximately 2 fold and 4 fold respectively when treated with phenol [32]. Although FabA was not mapped in the aforementioned study, it was suggested that under phenol stress, the expression level of FabA correlated with the upregulation of FabB. Our study corroborates this theory, as both fab A and fab B were upregulated approximately 3 and 4 fold respectively following 60 minutes exposure to OPP (t). In contrast, fab H2 was downregulated in P. aeruginosa after 20 minutes of treatment with peracetic acid [16].

With respect to energy metabolism, the genes: PA5561 (atp 1), PA2354, (probable cytochrome) and PA5556 (ATP synthase alpha chain), which are involved in ATP synthesis associated with oxidative phosphorylation and the electron transport chain were upregulated at both 20 and 60 minutes. This result suggests that oxidative phosphorylation is possibly a major route for energy production in P. aeruginosa treated with OPP.

Group II: genes upregulated upon 20 minutes exposure

Group II contained 13 genes, the least number of genes among the six groups (additional file 2). The most upregulated gene in this group was nor B (nitric oxide reductase subunit B), with an approximately four fold increase in transcription (table 1). The nitric oxide reductase enzyme is a membrane bound cytochrome bc complex which has been reported to be expressed under anaerobic conditions in P. stutzeri [3335]. NorB is the catalytic component of the NorBC complex and harbors low and high spin and low spin ferric heme proteins [36]. Recent experimental evidence suggests that coupled with electron transfer, proton uptake by NorB occurs from the periplasmic side of the bacterial cell membrane [33]. As such, nitrate can be used as the terminal electron acceptor instead of oxygen under anaerobic conditions, with nitric oxide being one of the intermediates in the reduction of nitrate to dinitrogen in the denitrification process [33]. Nitric oxide produced during denitrification is highly toxic to the cell and relies on the scavenging activity of nitric oxide reductase for cell survival [34]. A previous study [37] demonstrated that several genes involved in anaerobic respiration were upregulated in S. aureus after 20 minutes of exposure to peracetic acid, suggesting the possibility of a shift to anaerobic respiration in response to oxidative stress.

Another gene of interest in this group was PA3479: rhamnosyl transferase chain A (rhl A). The rhl AB operon catalyzes the first gylcosyl transfer reaction required for the synthesis of rhamnolipids [38, 39]. Rhamnolipids have been found in high levels in the sputum of cystic fribrosis patients and are classified as virulence factors [40]. Rhamnolipids have been postulated to act as biosurfactants that facilitate surface colonization [41]. The multicellular nature of both biofilms and cells undergoing swarming motility indicate that both phenomena are related [42, 43]. Rhamnosyl transferase chain A has been found to be critical for the exhibition of swarming motility by P. aeruginosa, which is important for environmental adaptation [44, 45]. It has also been demonstrated that P. aeruginosa mutants lacking type IV pili and flagella are unable to swarm [45]. The upregulation of type IV pili assembly genes at 20 and 60 minutes (group I) supports the possibility that P. aeruginosa treated with OPP may exhibit swarming motility as a stress response. The finding that the rhl A gene exhibited no change in its expression level at 60 minutes also supports this hypothesis. Moreover, the probable purine binding chemotaxis protein, PA0177, which belongs to the group of flagellar assembly proteins, was also upregulated in this group.

Previous studies have revealed that low iron levels significantly stimulated swarming motility, thereby preventing biofilm formation [44, 46]. From this observation, it was hypothesized that in an unfavorable nutritional environment, biosurfactant production and surface motility are over expressed in order to prevent P. aeruginosa from settling into a biofilm [44]. Our results are in line with this hypothesis, considering that the ferric iron-binding periplasmic protein and the iron III-transport system permease (hit A and hit B) were upregulated after both 20 and 60 minutes (group I) of exposure to OPP, suggesting active iron uptake.

Group III: genes downregulated upon 20 minutes exposure

One of the characteristics of this group was the downregulation of genes involved in hydrogen cyanide production: PA2193 (hcn A), PA2194 (hcn B), PA2195 (hcn C). The hcn ABC genes eoncode a cyanide synthase, which forms hydrogen cyanide from glycine [47]. These results are similar to those of a previous study where the hcn A and B genes were downregulated in P. aeruginosa treated with peracetic acid for 20 minutes [16]. Hydrogen cyanide is considered an extracellular virulence factor of P. aeruginosa and its production is transcriptionally regulated by the anaerobic regulator ANR and the quorum-sensing regulators LasR and PhlR [48]. It has been established that hydrogen cyanide is optimally produced when cell densities are high during the transition from exponential to stationary phase [49]. P. aeruginosa does not produce cyanide when it is grown under anaerobic conditions, with nitrate being used as the terminal electron acceptor [50]. The down regulation of genes responsible for cyanide production, therefore, supports the possibility that P. aeruginosa experiences an oxygen limiting state characterized by a transient switch to anaerobic metabolism. The upregulation of the nitric oxide reductase enzyme (nor B) in group II supports this theory. Further, the hcn ABC genes did not exhibit a change in expression levels at 60 minutes, indicating resumption of aerobic metabolism.

Also in this group was the gro EL gene which encodes a heat shock protein. In a previous study, the expression of gro EL was unchanged in P. putida exposed to phenol [32]. The clp B gene which encodes an ATP dependent protease that functions as part of a chaperone network necessary for the recovery of stress induced protein aggregates was downregulated 2.7 fold. In contrast, the clp B gene has been shown to be upregulated 2.4 fold in P. putida treated with phenol [32].

Group IV: genes upregulated upon 60 minutes exposure

Group IV consists of genes whose expression levels increased only in response to 60 minutes of exposure to OPP (additional file 2). This group contained the highest number of genes (227 genes) among the six groups generated based on gene transcription direction. The significantly higher number of genes in this group compared with the number of genes in group II (genes upregulated upon 20 minutes exposure), suggests that P. aeruginosa significantly adjusts its transcriptional profile after 60 minutes of treatment with OPP.

The most dominant classes in this group were "amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism", "membrane proteins", "nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism", "translation, post-translational modification and degradation" and "transport of small molecules".

Compared to the other functional classes in this group, a higher number of genes were involved in amino acid biosynthesis and in translation, post-translational modification and degradation. Active protein synthesis was reflected in the upregulation of several genes coding for 30 and 50S ribosomal proteins, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases associated with alanine (ala S), formylmethionine (fmt), glycine (gly Q), leucine (leu S), methionine and selenomethionine (met G), phenylalanine (phe S and phe T) and tryptophan (trp S). In addition, genes involved in the biosynthesis of several amino acids: arginine and proline (arg G, arg H), glutamine (gln A), lysine (lys A, lys C), glutamate (pro A, glt P), histidine (his B, his E), phenylalanine (aro K), serine (ser C, glyA 3), were also upregulated. These results are similar to those of a previous study [32] which indicated that the following enzymes were induced under phenol stress in P. putida: ArgD, ProA, GltD (involved in the glutamate biosynthetic pathway), TrpB and TrpS (belonging to aromatic amino acid biosynthetic pathways), and CysK and GlyA-2 (involved in the serine biosynthetic pathway). Based on these results, the authors suggested that phenol-stressed cells may experience amino acid deficits, and hence a shortage of proteins required for growth and survival [32]. Interestingly it has been shown that E. coli can adjust its rate of tryptophan biosynthesis following a shift to stressful nutritional conditions [51]. In contrast, a similar study in our laboratory investigating the effect of OPP on S. aureus [84] revealed that several genes involved in amino acid anabolism and specifically lysine and diaminopimelic acid (DAP) biosynthesis were markedly downregulated. This suggests that the effect of 0.82 mM OPP on amino acid metabolism in P. aeruginosa and S. aureus differ.

Among the genes coding for proteins involved in the transport of small molecules was the tol A gene, which codes for the TolA protein. The TolA protein is an inner membrane protein belonging to the TolQRAB protein complex [52] and is necessary for the uptake of the group A colicins and Tol-dependent phage [53, 54]. Tol proteins are also required to maintain the integrity of the bacterial cell envelope structure [52, 55]. Mutations in TolA have been shown to cause increased sensitivity to detergents and certain antimicrobials and the leakage of periplasmic proteins [56]. The upregulation of tol A after 60 minutes of exposure to OPP suggests a protective role for TolA, possibly related to the maintenance of the cell membrane structure.

In line with the upregulation of genes in the class of "transport of small molecules" after 60 minutes, was the induction of several genes belonging to the classes of "membrane proteins" and "protein secretion/export apparatus". The upregulation of the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter gene (glt P) and the proton glutamate symporter (glt P) is indicative of active transport across the cell membrane. Further evidence of translocation was seen in the upregulation of the components of translocation pathways such as the Sec dependent pathway (sec D, sec F) which is driven by ATP hydrolysis and the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (tat C) which uses energy derived from the proton motive force to translocate proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane [57, 58]. Interestingly, E. coli with mutations in tat C, which is critical for the functioning of the Tat system, show pleitropic defects in the cell envelope, leading to hypersensitivity to some detergents and drugs [59, 60]. The peptidoglycan associated lipoprotein precursor (opr L), which has been reported to play a protective role against hydrogen peroxide treatment in biofilms of P. aeruginosa [61] was also upregulated. Further, several genes encoding proteins in the ABC transport system, including the sulfate transport protein (cys A), probable protein binding component of iron ABC transporter (PA5217), probable periplasmic polyamine binding protein (PA0295) and probable ATP binding component of ABC transporters (PA4461, PA5503) were also upregulated in this group. These findings possibly imply that membrane components of P. aeruginosa were altered and that activated and or facilitated transport of ions, sugars, amino acids and other solutes necessary for cell survival was boosted after 60 minutes of exposure to OPP. It therefore appears that both the maintenance of active transport across and the integrity of the cell membrane are necessary for cell survival after 60 minutes of OPP treatment.

This group also contained six genes: rfa D, mur A, lpx A, lpp L, lpx B and waa F that are involved in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthetic pathway. LPS is the main component of the outer cell wall and upregulation of its synthesis suggests that adaptation to OPP treatment in P. aeruginosa may involve cell wall modification. Similar results were obtained in P. putida, where the LpxC, MurA and the VacJ (a putative lipoprotein) proteins were upregulated after exposure to phenol [32].

Another predominant functional group in this class contained genes involved in energy metabolism. Genes encoding several components of the F1ATP synthase (atp B, atp C, atp D, atp G) involved ATP generation by oxidative phosphorylation and elements mediating electron transfer (glutaredoxin (PA5129), ferredoxin I (PA3621), ferredoxin (PA0362) and the Na+-translocating NADH: quinone oxidoreductase subunit Nqr5 (PA2995) were upregulated. Other components involved in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway: (PA5561 (atp 1) and PA5556 (ATP synthase alpha chain) were upregulated after both 20 and 60 minutes (PA5561 (atp 1) and PA5556 (ATP synthase alpha chain). This corroborates the theory that energy production through this route is essential for OPP-treated cells.

An interesting observation was the upregulation of several genes involved in the biosynthesis of purines and pyrimidines after 60 minutes of treatment with OPP. The genes: pyr C, pyr E, pyr H, belonging to the pyrimidine biosynthetic operon that has been described in Bacillus subtilis [62] and the pur L gene involved in purine biosynthesis [63] were upregulated, suggesting that an increase in nucleotide biosynthesis may contribute to the adaptive response of P. aeruginosa to OPP. In contrast, the quantities of the PurM, PurL and PyrH proteins have been reported to be downregulated after exposure to phenol for 60 minutes [32].

Group V: genes downregulated upon 60 minutes exposure

This group contained a total of 70 genes (additional file 2) that were downregulated after 60 minutes of treatment with OPP. Genes belonging to the functional classes of "amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism", "energy metabolism and "putative enzymes" contained a relatively higher number of genes. It was interesting to find the nap A, B, D and F genes among the genes in the class of energy metabolism. These genes are some of the components of the nap operon that has been identified in many gram negative bacteria [64]. The E. coli nap operon (nap FDAGHBC) encodes a periplasmic nitrate reductase [65]. The respiratory periplasmic nitrate reductase in denitrifying P. sp. Strain G-179 has been reported to support anaerobic growth in the presence of nitrate [66]. Most Nap enzymes consist of a large catalytic sub subunit (NapA) and a small diheme cytochrome c (NapB). NapC is a membrane bound tetraheme cytochrome c that transfers electrons from the quinol pool in the cytoplasmic membrane to NapAB. NapD is found in the cytoplasm and plays a role in the maturation of the enzyme prior to export [67] and NapF is a non-heme iron-sulfur protein [68]. The downregulation of the nap A, B, D and F genes in this study suggests that after 60 minutes of OPP treatment, P. aeruginosa probably maintains aerobic growth. This is in contrast to after 20 minutes of treatment when the nitric oxide reductase gene was upregulated, suggesting a possible transient switch to anaerobic respiration (table 1).

This group also contained several genes involved in valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation. In particular, PA2247 (bkd A1), PA2248 (bkd A2), and 2250 (lpd V) which are involved in the conversion of valine, leucine and isoleucine to alkyl-CoA derivatives that feed into the TCA cycle, pyrimidine metabolism and propanoate metabolism were downregulated. Similarly, the bkd A1, bkd A2 and lpd V genes were downregulated in P. aeruginosa after exposure to peracetic acid for 20 minutes [16]. The results of the present study suggest that the synthesis of these amino acids was being inhibited after 60 minutes of OPP treatment with concomitant inhibition of energy production through the TCA cycle. Further, several genes involved in the synthesis of acetylCoA were present in this group. In particular, PA2013 and PA0745 (probable enoylCoA hydratases) involved in the synthesis of acetylCoA from Lysine and butanoate respectively and PA3417 (probable pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component) which catalyzes the transformation of pyruvate to acetylCoA were downregulated. These results support the fact that energy production through the TCA cycle was being inhibited after 60 minutes of exposure to OPP.

Group VI: genes downregulated at 20 and 60 minutes exposure

The most downregulated gene in this group was the ribosome modulation factor gene (rmf), which exhibited a fold change of -6.25 after 20 minutes of OPP treatment and -25.9 after 60 minutes. The ribosome modulation factor (RMF) is a ribosome associated protein that is produced by E. coli during slow growth at exponential phase [69] and upon entry into stationary phase [70]. RMF is considered a protective factor of ribosomes against stresses such as heat shock, acidic/basic pH and high osmolarity during stationary phase [71]. Mutant stationary phase E. coli strains without functional RMF are more susceptible to osmotic stress [72] and heat stress [73]. The production of RMF by stationary phase cells has been linked to the detection of the dimerized form of 70S ribosomes: 100S ribosomes with no translational activity [71, 74, 75].

In exponentially growing E. coli cells not treated with any chemicals and in those treated with acidifying agents, it was found that rmf expression was growth rate dependent and there was an inverse relationship between rmf expression and growth rate [69, 76]. It has been postulated that the function of RMF in slow growing exponential phase cells is to promote more efficient protein synthesis through the inactivation of excess ribosomes, thereby reducing competition for protein synthesis factors [76]. Our results contrast those of previous studies which have reported that rmf is expressed in slow growing cells during exponential phase [69, 76]. It was surprising that rmf expression was downregulated upon both treatment times, but more significantly after 60 minutes, given the fact that OPP-treated P. aeruginosa cells in this study were also slow growing during exponential phase. However, more investigation is required to determine the mechanism by which OPP treatment influences transcriptional control, leading to downregulation of the expression of the rmf gene in P. aeruginosa.

The rpo S gene which encodes RpoS, an alternative sigma factor of RNA ploymerase was also downregulated after both exposure times. RpoS is known to participate in the stress response of both E. coli and P. aeruginosa [77, 78]. Although RpoS is more widely considered a global regulator in a complex regulatory network that controls the expression of several stationary-phase inducible genes, it has been demonsrated that RpoS also acts as a master regulator of gene expression in exponentially growing E. coli cells exposed to osmotic stress [79]. Further, a previous study revealed that cell viability was slightly decreased in E. coli cells containing mutations in rmf and rpo S [80]. The downregulation of the rmf and rpo S genes may therefore be indicative of the mechanism of action by which OPP causes a growth inhibition in P. aeruginosa.

This group also contained four genes that are involved in the P. aeruginosa heat shock response: grp E, hsl U, hsl V and htp G. In contrast to these results, the HtpG and GrpE proteins have been reported to be upregulated in P. putida exposed to phenol and to hydrochloric acid [32, 81]. The hsl VU operon encodes two heat shock proteins, HslV and HslU that function together as an ATP-dependent protease [82]. The hsl UV operon was upregulated in E. coli after exposure to acid stress for 10 minutes [81]. This result suggests that transcriptional regulation of the expression of these heat shock proteins during stress may vary depending on the nature of the environmental stress.

Validation of microarray data using real-time PCR

In order to validate the relative transcript levels obtained by the microarray analysis, we employed quantitative real-time PCR on six genes. These genes were selected because they displayed a wide range of mRNA level changes (-25- to 6-fold). Table 2 indicates that our microarray results were in agreement with quantitative real-time PCR analyses of the selected genes.
Table 2

Transcript level comparison of P. aeruginosa genes between real-time PCR and microarray analyses

Gene

amRNA level change with microarray

bmRNA level change with real-time PCR

Forward primer sequence (5'-3')

Reverse primer sequence (5'-3')

 

Fold change

Fold change

  
 

20 min

60 min

20 min

60 min

  

PA4243

2.914

6.799

3.605 (± 1.55)

7.378 (± 0.7)

ATGGCTAAGCAAGGTGCTCTCTCT

ACGATGATCGCCAGGAACAGGAAA

PA2193

-2.268

 

-1.967 (± 1.06)

 

TGAACGTCAACACGATATCCAGCC

ATTGAGCACGTTGAGCACGGTCT

PA1173

 

-3.077

 

-3.03 (± 5.64)

ATCGACAAGGACAGCAACAAGTGC

GTCCATGTAGTGGGTGATGCTGAT

PA3049

-6.25

-25.907

-10.196 (± 0.14)

-48.503 (± 0.35)

TCGTGATCTTTGTCCGTTCACCCA

CGTGCTGGAGTTGATTGAGACGTT

PA3724

-2.762

-10.256

-5.856 (± 0.21)

-14.928 (± 1.27)

TCATCACCGTCGACATGAACAGCA

AGTCCCGGTACAGTTTGAACACCA

PA3622

-2.653

-2.967

-1.954 (± 1.95)

-5.924 (± 1.60)

TGACCACGATGATGAAGTGCTCCT

TTGGAAGAGAAGGAAGTGGTGGCT

cPA3001

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

GCACCATCACCATCGACGAAGAAA

TCTTGATGCCGTACTGGGTGTAGT

The real time PCR results are the mean of three biological replicates with three technical replicates for each gene. The microarray results are the mean of four replicates of each gene.

aThe microarray results are the mean of four replicates of each gene.

bThe real time PCR results are the mean of three biological replicates with three technical replicates for each gene.

cInternal control: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Conclusion

The present study represents the first genome-wide response of P. aeruginosa exposed to 0.82 mM OPP. The results from this study indicate that after 20 minutes of OPP exposure, genes involved in anaerobic metabolism and swarming motility were upregulated. We suggest that P. aeruginosa undergoes a switch to denitrification as indicated by downregulation of cyanide production which is indicative of anaerobic respiration. OPP treatment also caused the downregulation of the genes encoding the ribosome modulation factor (rmf) and an alternative sigma factor (rpo S) of RNA polymerase which have been linked to decreases in cell viability when mutated. The repression of these genes may be contributory to the growth inhibition observed after P. aeruginosa was exposed to OPP and may reflect the mechanism of action by which OPP reduces the viability of P. aeruginosa cells, leading to the observed growth inhibition. We suspect that the continuous marked upregulation of translation after both 20 and 60 minutes and of amino acid biosynthesis following 60 minutes exposure to OPP are consequential responses to combat this growth repression. Our results suggest that these responses may involve the upregulation of genes involved in the synthesis of membrane transport and virulence proteins and also proteins involved in the maintainanceof the integrity of the cell membrane. In addition, after 60 minutes of OPP treatment, the adaptive response to OPP treatment may involve cell wall modification evidenced by the upregulation of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes. It is worth noting that in contrast to the results of this study, we have observed that in S. aureus, OPP treatment led to downregulation of amino acid anabolism in general and specifically lysine and diaminopimelic acid (DAP) biosynthesis genes (unpublished data). It is therefore apparent that OPP exerts differential effects on amino acid metabolism in P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.

This gene expression profile can now be employed to more profoundly understand the mechanisms by which OPP exerts a killing effect on P. aeruginosa and how this organism develops resistance to phenolic disinfectants in general and to OPP in particular. The information from this study provides useful information that will benefit further research on the toxicogenomic impact of phenolic biocides on P. aeruginosa. Further, considering that multicellular behavior in bacteria such as swarming motility is an adaptation to environmental stress, it will be interesting to investigate the comparative response of sessile cells versus cells exhibiting swarming motility to OPP treatment.

Methods

Bacterial growth and treatment with OPP

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was grown at 37°C for 17 hours on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar. An isolated colony was inoculated into 100 ml of sterilized LB broth (10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract and 10 g of sodium chloride per liter) and incubated overnight for 17 hours at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. A 1:100 dilution of the culture was performed using pre-warmed LB broth. The diluted culture was incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm until a final optical density (OD600) of 0.8 (early logarithmic phase) was attained. A further 1:10 dilution was performed using LB broth and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. When the OD600 of the 1:100 dilution reached 0.8, the culture was incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm with various concentrations of OPP (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St Louis, MO) and the OD600 of the growth culture was determined at intervals of ten minutes for a total time of 60 minutes. A concentration of 0.82 mM OPP, with treatment times of 20 and 60 minutes were targeted for this study.

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted after 20 and 60 minutes incubation with 0.82 mM OPP and without OPP (control). The RNA extraction procedure was carried out using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 1 ml of bacterial culture was added to 2 ml of RNAprotect bacteria reagent (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). Centrifugation (5000 g for 10 minutes) of the mixture was performed to precipitate the cells. The harvested cells were incubated in TE buffer with 1 mg/ml lysozyme (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Total RNA was eluted in 50 ml of RNase free water (Ambion Inc., Austin Texas) using kit supplied columns containing silica gel membranes. The quantity of eluted RNA was determined using the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE). RNA quality was examined using the RNA 6000 Nano Labchip with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).

cDNA synthesis and labeling

cDNA was synthesized from 12 μg of total RNA using random primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the Affymetrix P. aeruginosa GeneChip arrays protocol (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Spike controls containing RNA transcripts from several Bacillus subtilis genes were included in the RNA mixtures as internal controls to monitor the efficiency of labeling, hybridization and staining. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25° for 10 minutes, 37°C for 60 minutes and 42°C for 60 minutes followed by inactivation of the enzyme at 70°C for 10 minutes. Purification of cDNA was carried out using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). The cDNA was fragmented at 37°C for 10 minutes in a reaction mixture consisting of purified cDNA and DNase I (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis) in One-Phor-All buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the order of 0.06 U DNase/μl of cDNA. The quality of fragmented cDNA was examined using the RNA 6000 Nano Labchip with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Labeling of the 3' termini of fragmented cDNA was performed using the Enzo BioArray terminal labeling kit with Biotin-ddUTP (Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Farmingdale, NY).

Hybridization, processing and scanning

Array hybridization and processing were carried out according to instructions provided in the affymetrix expression analysis technical manual: chapters 5 and 6 [83]. The hybridization solution consisted of the fragmented/labeled cDNA, B2 control oligonucleotide, MES hybridization buffer, bovine serum albumin and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in a final volume of 200 μl. The mixture was hybridized onto P. aeruginosa GeneChip arrays (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) at 50°C for 16 hours with tumbling. The arrays were washed and stained using the Affymetrix GeneChip hybridization, wash and stain kit containing the stain cocktails 1 and 2 and the array holding buffer. The array staining and washing process was performed using the GeneChip Fluidics station 450 (Affymetrix). Processed arrays were scanned with the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000.

Data analysis

Data analysis was carried out using the Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS), version 1.0 and GeneSpring Version 7.3 (Agilent Technologies). The following parameters were employed for expression analysis using GCOS: α1 = 0.04, α2 = 0.06, τ = 0.015 and target signal was scaled to 150. Genes that were assigned "absent calls" from 50% or more of the replicates in GeneSpring were not included in the analysis. Gene expression changes with statistical significance were identified by 1-way ANOVA (p cutoff value = 0.05). Fold changes were calculated as the ratios between the signal averages of four untreated (control) and four OPP-treated (experimental) cultures. Genes with a two-fold or more induction or repression were used in this analysis.

Real-Time PCR analysis

Transcript level changes obtained from microarray analysis (six genes) were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR. The genes and primer sequences employed for the real-time PCR analysis are listed in table 2. The housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (PA3001) was used as an endogenous control. Real-time PCR was performed using the iCycler iQ Real-Time PCR Detection System with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit and IQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). For each gene, three biological replicates and three technical replicates were employed. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 3 minutes at 95.0°C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 seconds at 95.0°C, 30 seconds at 55.0°C, and 20 seconds at 72.0°C. PCR efficiencies were also derived from standard curve slopes in the iCycler software v. 3.1 (BioRad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). To evaluate PCR specificity, melt curve analysis was performed and this resulted in single primer-specific melting temperatures. In this report, relative quantification based on the relative expression of a target gene versus the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene was utilized to determine the transcript level changes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency Grant number T-83284001-1. Although the research described in this paper has been funded wholly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review and therefore may not necessarily reflect the views of the EPA; nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement of recommendation of use.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute
(2)
Microarray Research Laboratory, Biological and Economic Analysis Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

References

  1. Wenzel RP, Edmond MP: The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001, 7: [http://www.cdc.gov/Ncidod/eid/vol7no2/wenzel.htm]Google Scholar
  2. Bielecki G, Glick A, Kawecki M, Martins dos Santos VAP: Towards understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infections by profiling gene expressions. Biotechnol Lett. 2008, 30: 777-790. 10.1007/s10529-007-9620-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer SC, Wunderink RG, Jones CB, Leeper KV: Ventilator associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chest. 1996, 109: 1019-1029. 10.1378/chest.109.4.1019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Saltzstein D, Wachs B, Perroncel R, Benson A, Herrington J, Haverstock D, Pertel P: Complicated urinary tract infections treated with extended-release ciprofloxacin with emphasis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Chemother. 2007, 19: 694-702.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Van Delden C, Iglewski BH: Cell-to-cell signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998, 4: [http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol4no4/vandelden.htm]Google Scholar
  6. Govan JR, Deretic V: Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkolderia cepacia. Microbiol Rev. 1996, 60: 539-574.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Mendelson MH, Gurtman A, Szabo S, Neibart E, Meyers BR, Policar M, Cheung TW, Lillienfeld D, Reddy S: Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1994, 18: 886-895.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kramer VC, Nickerson KW, Hamlett NV, O'Hara C: Prevalence of extreme detergent resistance among the Enterobacteriaceae. Can J Microbiol. 1984, 30: 711-713.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lautenbach E, Polk RE: Resistant gram-negative bacilli: a neglected health-care crisis?. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007, 64 (Suppl 14): S3-S21. 10.2146/ajhp070477.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettenkofer M, Spencer RC: Importance of environmental decontamination-a critical review. J Hosp Infect. 2007, 65 (Suppl 2): 55-57. 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60016-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bomhard EM, Brendler-Schwaab SY, Freyberger A, Herbold BA, Leser KH, Richter M: O-phenylphenol and its sodium and potassium salts: a toxicological assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2002, 32: 551-625. 10.1080/20024091064318.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stouten H: Toxicologial profile for o-phenylphenol and its sodium salt. J Appl Toxicol. 1998, 18: 261-270. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199807/08)18:4<261::AID-JAT505>3.0.CO;2-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nunoshiba T, Watanabe E, Takahashi T, Daigaku Y, Ishikawa S, Mochizuki M, Ui A, Enomoto T, Yamamoto K: Ames test-negative carcinogen, ortho-phenyl phenol, binds tubulin and causes aneuploidy in budding yeast. Mutat Res. 2007, 617: 90-97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tayama S, Kamiya N, Nakagawa Y: Genotoxic effects of o-phenylphenol metabolites in CHO-k1 cells. Mutat Res. 1989, 223: 23-33. 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90059-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang W, Small DA, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals induction of pyocin genes in response to hydrogen peroxide. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 115-10.1186/1471-2164-6-115.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang W, Small DA, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Microarray analysis of toxicogenomic effects of peracetic acid on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Sci Technol. 2005, 39: 5893-5899. 10.1021/es0503534.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Salunkhe P, Topfer T, Buer J, Tummler B: Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the steady-state response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 2565-2572. 10.1128/JB.187.8.2565-2572.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Small DA, Chang W, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Toxicogenomic analysis of sodium hypochlorite antimicrobial mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 74: 176-185. 10.1007/s00253-006-0644-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Small DA, Chang W, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Comparative global transcriptome analysis of sodium hypochlorite, peracetic acid, and hydrogen peroxide on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 76: 1093-1105. 10.1007/s00253-007-1072-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambert RJW: Comparative analysis of antibiotic and antimicrobial biocide susceptibility data in clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococccus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa between 1989 and 2000. J Appl Microbiol. 2004, 97: 699-711. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02345.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo]
  22. NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus series accession number: GSE10604. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/query/acc.cgi?roo=md&acc=GSE10604&form=html&targ=self&view=quick]
  23. Pseudomnas aeruginosa Community Annotation Project. [http://v2.pseudomonas.com/]
  24. Winsor GL, Sui SJ, Ung KS, Huang S, Cheng D, Ching WK, Hancock RE, Brinkman FS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Genome Database and PseudoCAP: facilitating community-based, continually updated, genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D338-D343. 10.1093/nar/gki047.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang W, Small DA, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Global transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus response to hydrogen peroxide. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 1648-1659. 10.1128/JB.188.4.1648-1659.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Jang H-J, Chang MW, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Microarray analysis of toxicogenomic effects of triclosan on Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 78: 695-707. 10.1007/s00253-008-1349-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Freestone P, Trinei M, Clarke SC, Nystrom T, Norris V: Tyrosine phosphorylation in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1998, 279: 1045-1051. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1836.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hueck CJ: Type III secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62: 379-433.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Adhikari P, Kirby SD, Nowalk AJ, Veraldi KL, Schryvers AB, Mietzner TA: Biochemical Characterization of a Haemophilus influenzae periplasmic iron transport operon. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 25142-25149. 10.1074/jbc.270.42.25142.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Darzins A: Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene cluster involved in pilus biosynthesis and twitching motility: sequence similarity to the chemotaxis proteins of enterics and the gliding bacterium Myxococcus Xanthus. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 11: 137-153. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00296.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Toole GA, Colter RW: Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Biol. 1998, 30: 295-304.Google Scholar
  32. Santos P, Benndorf D, Sa-Correia I: Insights into Pseudomonas putida KT2440 response to phenol-induced stress by quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 2640-2652. 10.1002/pmic.200300793.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Flock U, Thorndycroft FH, Matorin AD, Richardson DJ, Watmough NJ: Defining the proton entry point in the bacterial respiratory nitric-oxide reductase. J Biol Chem. 2007, 283: 3839-3845. 10.1074/jbc.M704615200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kastrau DHW, Heiss B, Kroneck MH, Zumft WG: Nitric oxide from Pseudomonas stutzeri, a novel cytochrome bc complex. Phospholipid requirement, electron paramagnetic resonance and redox properties. Eur J of Biochem. 1994, 222: 293-303. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18868.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Korner H: Expression of nitric oxide reductase from denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri. Arch Microbiol. 1993, 159: 410-416. 10.1007/BF00288586.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Heiss B, Frunzke K, Zumft WG: Formation of the N-N bond from nitric oxide by a membrane-bound cytochrome bc complex of nitrate-respiring (denitrifying) Pseudomonas stutzeri. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 3288-3297.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Chang W, Toghrol F, Bentley WEB: Toxicogenomic response of Staphylococcus aureus to peracetic acid. Environ Sci Technol. 2006, 40: 5124-5131. 10.1021/es060354b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ochsner UA, Fiechter A, Reiser J: Isolation and expression in Escherichia coli of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhlAB genes encoding a rhamnosyl transferase involved in rhamnolipid biosurfactant synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 19787-19795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oshsner UA, Hembach T, Fiechter A: Production of rhamnolipid biosurfactants. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1995, 53: 89-118.Google Scholar
  40. Kownatzki R, Tummler B, Doring G: Rhamnolipid of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum of cystic fibrosis patients. Lancet. 1987, 1: 1026-1027. 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92286-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Beal R, Betts WB: Role of rhamnolipid biosurfactants in the uptake and mineralization of hexadecane in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Appl Microbiol. 2000, 89: 158-168. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01104.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Eberl L, Soren M, Givskov M: Surface Motility of Serratia liquefaciens MG1. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 1703-1712.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Harshey RM: Bees aren't the only ones: swarming in gram-negative bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 13: 389-394. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00433.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Deziel E, Lepine F, Milot S, Villemur R: rhlA is required for the production of a novel biosurfactant promoting swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids (HAAs), the precursors of rhamnolipids. Microbiol. 2003, 149: 2005-2013. 10.1099/mic.0.26154-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kohler T, Curty LK, Barja F, van Delden C, Pechere J-C: Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on cell-to-cell signaling and requires flagella and pili. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 5990-5996. 10.1128/JB.182.21.5990-5996.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh PK, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP, Welsh MJ: A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development. Nature. 2002, 417: 552-555. 10.1038/417552a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Castric PA: Influence of oxygen on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa hydrogen cyanide synthase. Curr Microbiol. 1994, 29: 19-21. 10.1007/BF01570186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pessi G, Haas D: Transcriptional control of the hydrogen cyanide biosynthetic genes hcnABC by the anaerobic regulator ANR and the quorum- sensing regulators LasR and RhlR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2002, 182: 6940-6949. 10.1128/JB.182.24.6940-6949.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Castric PA, Ebert RF, Castric KF: The relationship between growth phase and cyanogenesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Microbiol. 1979, 2: 287-292. 10.1007/BF02602861.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Castric P: Hydrogen cyanide, a secondary metabolite of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Microbiol. 1975, 21: 613-618.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Yanofsky C, Horn V: Role of regulatory features of the trp operon of Escherichia coli in mediating a response to a nutritional shift. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 6245-6254.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Vianney A, Lewin TM, Beyer WF, Lazzaroni JC, Portalier R, Webster RE: Membrane topology and mutational analysis of the TolQ protein of Escherichia coli required for the uptake of macromolecules and cell envelope integrity. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 822-829.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. LevenGood SK, Beyer WF, Webster RE: TolA: A membrane protein involved in colicin uptake contains an extended helical region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 5939-5943. 10.1073/pnas.88.14.5939.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Journet L, Bouveret E, Rigal A, Llobes R, Lazdunski C, Benedetti H: Import of colicins across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli involves multiple protein interactions in the periplasm. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 42: 331-344. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02592.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Dennis JJ, Lafontaine ER, Sokol PA: Identification and characterization of the tolQRA genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2001, 178: 7059-7068.Google Scholar
  56. Schendel SL, Click EM, Webster RE, Cramer WA: The TolA protein interacts with colicin E1 differently than with other group A colicins. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3683-3690.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Manting EH, Driessen AJM: Escherichia coli translocase: the unraveling of a molecular machine. Mol Biol. 2000, 37: 226-238.Google Scholar
  58. Yahr TL, Wickner WT: Functional reconstitution of bacterial Tat translocation in vitro. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 2472-2479. 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2472.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ize B, Stanley NR, Buchanan G, Palmer T: Role of the Escherichia coli Tat pathway in outer membrane integrity. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48: 1183-1193. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03504.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Stanley NR, Findlay K, Berks BC, Palmer T: Escherichia coli strains blocked in Tat-dependent protein export exhibit pleitropic defects in the cell envelope. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 139-144. 10.1128/JB.183.1.139-144.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Panmanee W, Gomez F, Witte D, Vijay P, Britigan BE, Hassett DJ: The peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein, OprL, helps protect a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant devoid of the transactivator, OxyR, from hydrogen peroxide-mediated killing during planktonic and biofilm culture. J Bacteriol. 2008,Google Scholar
  62. Turner RJ, Lu Y, Switzer RL: Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis pyrimidine biosynthetic (pyr) gene cluster by an autogenous transcriptional attenuation mechanism. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 3708-3722.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Alacantra RB, Read RDA, Valderas MW, Brown TD, Roop RM: Intact purine biosynthetic pathways are required for wild-type virulence of Brucella abortus 2308 in the BALB/c mouse model. Infect immun. 2004, 72: 4911-4917. 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4911-4917.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Tabata A, Yamamoto I: Differential regulation of periplasmic nitrate reductase gene (napKEFDABC) expression between aerobiosis and anaerobiosis with nitrate in a denitrifying phototroph Rhodobacter sphaeroides f. sp. Denitrificans. Arch Microbiol. 2005, 184: 108-116. 10.1007/s00203-005-0029-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Brondjik THC, Fiegen D, Richardson DJ, Cole JA: Roles of NapF, NapG and NapH, subunits of the Escherichia coli periplasmic nitrate reductase in ubiquinol oxidation. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 44: 245-255. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02875.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Bedzyk L, Wong T, Ye RW: The periplasmic nitrate reductase in Pseudomonas sp. Strain G-179 catalyzes the first step of denitrification. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 2802-2806.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Potter LC, Cole JA: Essential roles for the products of the napABCD genes, but not napFGH, in periplasmic nitrate reduction by Escherichia coli K-12. Biochem J. 1999, 344: 69-76. 10.1042/0264-6021:3440069.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Nilavongse A, Brondjik THC, Overton TW, Richardson DJ, Leach ER, Cole JA: The NapF protein of Escherichia coli periplasmic nitrate reductase system: demonstration of a cytoplasmic location and interaction with the catalytic subunit, NapA. Microbiol. 2006, 152: 3227-3237. 10.1099/mic.0.29157-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Yamagishi M, Matsushima H, Wada A, Sakagami M, Fujita N, Ishihama A: Regulation of the Escherichia coli rmf gene encoding the ribosome modulation factor: growth phase- and growth rate-dependent control. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 625-630.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Wada A, Yamazaki Y, Fujita N, Ishihama A: Structure and probable genetic location of a "ribosome modulation factor" associated with 100S ribosomes in stationary phase Escherichia coli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 2657-2661. 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2657.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Izutsu K, Wada A, Wada C: Expression of ribosome modulation factor (RMF) in Escherichia coli requires ppGpp. Genes Cells. 2001, 6: 665-676. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00457.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Garay-Arroyo A, Colmenero-Flores JM, Garciarrubio A, Covarrubias AA: Highly hydrophilic proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are common during conditions of water deficit. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 5668-5674. 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5668.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Niven GW: Ribosome modulation factor protects Escherichia coli during heat stress but this may not be dependent on ribosome dimerization. Arch Microbiol. 2004, 182: 60-66. 10.1007/s00203-004-0698-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. El-Sharoud WM, Niven GW: The influence of ribosome modulation factor on the survival of stationary-phase Escherichia coli during acid stress. Microbiol. 2007, 153: 247-253. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/001552-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Yoshida H, Maki Y, Kato H, Fujisawa H, Izutsu K, Wada C, Wada A: The ribosome modulation factor (RMF) binding site on the 100S ribosome of Escherichia coli. J Biochem. 2002, 132: 983-989.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. El-Sharoud WM, Niven GW: The activity of ribosome modulation factor during growth of Escherichia coli under acidic conditions. Arch Microbiol. 2005, 184: 18-24. 10.1007/s00203-005-0025-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Ishihama A: Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000, 54: 499-518. 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.499.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Jorgensen F, Bally M, Chapon-Herve V, Michel G, Lazdunski A, Williams P, Stewart GS: RpoS-dependent stress tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. 1999, 145: 835-844.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Hengge-Aronis R: Back to log phase: σs as a global regulator in the osmotic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 21: 887-893. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.511405.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Raj VS, Full C, Yoshida M, Sakata K, Kashiwagi K, Ishihama A, Igarashi K: Decrease in cell viability in an RMF, Sigma (38) and OmpC triple mutant of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2002, 299: 252-257. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02627-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Kannann G, Wilks JC, Fitzgerald DM, Jones BD, BonDurant SS, Slonczewski JL: Rapid acid treatment of Escherichia coli: transcriptomic response and recovery. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8: 37-10.1186/1471-2180-8-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Katayama T, Kubota T, Takata M, Akimitsu N, Sekimizu K: Disruption of the hslU gene, which encodes an ATPase subunit of the eukaryotic 26S proteosome homolog in Escherichia coli, suppresses the temperature-sensitive dna46 mutation. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1996, 229: 219-224. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1783.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Affymetrix, Inc. GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual. 2004, [http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/manual/expression_manual.affx]
  84. Jang HJ, Nde C, Toghrol F, Bentley WE: Microarray analysis of toxicogenomic effects of ortho-phenylphenol in Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 411-10.1186/1471-2164-9-411.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nde et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.