Skip to main content

Table 1 Characterization of matrices assembled for phylogenetic inference

From: Extracting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets supports the Ctenophora as sister to remaining Metazoa

Matrix name

Number of loci

Length (amino acids)

Missing data (%)

Criteria of locus selection

Total1080

1080

385,669

24.15

All loci that after trimming and filtering of paralogs

TaxaMin30

609

199,667

20.44

Loci with at least 30 taxa present

TaxaMin33

162

44,749

20

Loci with at least 33 taxa present

TaxaMin35

88

31,989

13.89

Loci with at least 35 taxa present

60Boot

55

37,682

25.92

Average locus tree bootstrap 60 or more

MareMatrix

143

35,030

20.02

MARE (Misof et al. 2013) algorithm filtering with alpha at 3.15

Slow108

108

33,580

18.91

10 % of the most slowly evolving loci

LowLB

171

60,397

22

Low LB scores in the outgroups, sponge, and ctenophore

Saturation108

108

36,954

19.78

10 % of the least saturated loci

Best108

108

41,808

15.55

10 % of loci scoring best in taxon occupancy, saturation, rate of evolution, average bootstrap, and LB scores

NoOutgr

143

35,022

18.49

As MareMatrix but realigned without Monosiga and Salpingoeca outgroups

NoAmphi

143

35,032

19.75

As MareMatrix but realigned without the sponge Amphimedon

NoOutgrAmphi

143

35,009

18.13

As MareMatrix but realigned without the sponge and the outgroups