Skip to main content

Table 1 Variants associated with metabolic traits

From: Cross-phenotype association tests uncover genes mediating nutrient response in Drosophila

Screena

Phenotype(s)b

Testb

Chrc

Positionc

Genec

% Vard

p e

FDRf

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance

genotype

2L

13967604

nimB3

18 %

3.70E-13

0 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

triglycerides

genotype

3R

14072066

14-3-3 ε

20 %

1.29E-14

10 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and triglycerides on AL

SMAT

3L

11418293

CG7560

8 %

8.88E-16

0 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and triglycerides on AL

SMAT

2R

16952034

Cht12

6 %

6.18E-11

10 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on AL

SMAT

3R

19635620

EIF4G2

8 %

1.71E-13

10 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on AL

SMAT

3R

24549344

htt

12 %

2.78E-12

10 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on DR

SMAT

X

6152605

schlank

3 %

4.44E-16

0 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on DR

SMAT

X

6152619

schlank

3 %

4.44E-16

0 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on DR

SMAT

X

6152558

schlank

2 %

6.66E-16

0 %

MAF ≥ 5 %

starvation resistance and mass on DR

SMAT

X

6152586

schlank

2 %

8.88E-16

0 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

body mass

genotype

X

12430723

CG43921

15 %

3.84E-13

0 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

glucose

interaction

3R

8877613

pic

4 %

5.94E-3

7 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

glucose

interaction

3R

8877592

pic

4 %

6.72E-3

7 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

glucose

interaction

3R

8877227

CG7966

5 %

6.75E-3

7 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

glucose

interaction

3R

8877378

CG7966

5 %

8.69E-3

8 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

starvation

genotype

2L

13967604

nimB3

18 %

3.70E-13

0 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

starvation resistance and mass on DR

SMAT

X

8903670

rdgA

15 %

1.27E-08

10 %

MAF ≥ 25 %

starvation resistance and triglycerides on DR

SMAT

3R

4279209

CG43462

8 %

1.29E-09

10 %

  1. aResults from association scans across markers meeting the indicated criterion. For results from the scaled multiple-phenotype association test (SMAT) applied to variants at frequency of ≥5 %, only human disease orthologs were tested
  2. bThe single phenotype whose measurements in animals reared on both diets were tested in a linear model with terms for diet, genotype, and the interaction between the two; or the pair of phenotypes whose measurements in animals reared on the indicated diet were tested via SMAT. DR, dietary restriction; AL, ad libitum
  3. cChromosome segment, position (in D. melanogaster genome version R5 coordinates), and gene in which the associating marker lay
  4. dPercent phenotypic variation explained by the indicated polymorphism. For pairs of phenotypes, the value reports results for the single phenotype with the highest % variance explained
  5. eNominal association p-value
  6. fFalse discovery rate at the association p-value according to permutation analysis