Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistical analysis of attributes chosen by the feature selection methods for the four organisms. Four attributes (PEPIB, CAI, N30 disorder, and Gā€‰+ā€‰C content) out of the 21 appeared in at least three of the four organisms tested. Actual values for all attributes are given in Additional file 1)

From: Computational approach to predict species-specific type III secretion system (T3SS) effectors using single and multiple genomes

Organism

Attribute

Positive set

Negative set

Average

SDb

Average

SD

E. coli

Non-Polar

48.67

8.89

58.42

10.70

PEPIB

0.86

0.07

0.77

0.14

CAI

0.58

0.02

0.71

0.06

N30 disorder

0.53

0.11

0.38

0.13

P. syringae

Tiny

41.11

9.45

30.32

9.09

Chargea

0.93

1.25

0.60

2.40

pIa

7.74

1.42

6.71

1.76

PEPIB

0.90

0.11

0.74

0.16

Aliphatic index

61.19

18.33

100.96

32.15

CAI

0.51

0.06

0.68

0.07

Gā€‰+ā€‰C content

51.62

5.77

59.04

3.91

N30 disorder

0.67

0.07

0.41

0.14

S. dysenteriae

Non-Polar

45.11

9.07

56.09

10.11

Tinya

24.22

10.87

29.16

9.29

Gā€‰+ā€‰C content

34.62

1.80

51.65

3.70

N30 disorder

0.47

0.12

0.22

0.13

S. Typhimurium

PEPIB

0.88

0.12

0.74

0.21

Instability index

65.21

22.55

38.43

22.54

CAI

0.58

0.04

0.69

0.05

Gā€‰+ā€‰C content

43.99

6.18

52.18

5.74

  1. aAttributes that are not statistically different between the positive and negative sets
  2. b SD standard deviation