Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies

Hernández Mora, José R.; Micheletti, Diego; Bink, Marco; Van de Weg, Eric; Cantín, Celia; Nazzicari, Nelson; Caprera, Andrea; Dettori, Maria Teresa; Micali, Sabrina; Banchi, Elisa; Campoy, José Antonio; Dirlewanger, Elisabeth; Lambert, Patrick; Pascal, Thierry; Troggio, Michela; Bassi, Daniele; Rossini, Laura; Verde, Ignazio; Quilot-Turion, Bénédicte; Laurens, François; Arús, Pere; Aranzana, Maria José

doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3783-6

BMC Genomics

Table 1 Description of the 18 progenies included in the analysis

From: Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies

Cross (parents)	Acronym	Location	Commercial (C)/Non-commercial (NC) Cross^a type	Type of progeny	Progeny size	Measured phenotypes evaluated (number of years with evaluation available) ^b	Reference
‘Bolero’ × ‘Oro A’	B × O	UMIL - Milan	C.	F1	72	MD(2), PSC(3), TA(2), SSC(2), FW(2)	[40]
‘Contender’ × ‘Elegant Lady’	C × EL	UMIL - Milan	C.	F1	74	MD(3)	[56]
‘Max 10’ × ‘Rebus 028’	M × R028	UMIL - Milan	C.	F1	68	MD(2), PSC(2), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	-
‘Belbinette’ × ‘Nectalady’	Bb × Nl	IRTA - Lleida	C.	F1	98	FD(2), MD(3), FDP(1), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	[46]
‘Big Top’ × ‘Nectaross’	Bt × Nr	IRTA - Lleida	C.	F1	44	FD(2), MD(4), FDP(2), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	-
‘Big Top’ × ‘Armking’	Bt × Ak	IRTA - Lleida	C.	F1	75	FD(4), MD(4), FDP(4), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	-
‘Rome Star’ × ‘BC1.25’	RS × 25	CREA - Rome	NC.	F1	20	FD(2), MD(3), FDP(2), PSC(3), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	-
‘Rome Star’ × ‘BC1.61’	RS × 61	CREA - Rome	NC.	F1	25	FD(2), MD(3), FDP(2), PSC(3), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	-
‘Bolinha’ × ‘Bolinha’	Bo × Bo	INRA - Avignon	NC.	F2	112	FD(2), MD(2), FDP(2), FW(2)	-
‘Ferjalou Jalousia’ × ‘Fantasia’	J × F	INRA - Bordeaux	C.	F2	141	FD(2), MD(2), FDP(2), PSC(2), TA(2), SSC(5), FW(2)	[57]
‘Weeping Flower Peach’ × ‘Pamirskij 5’	WF × P	INRA - Avignon	NC.	F2	96	FD(1), MD(1), FDP(1), TA(1), SSC(1)	-
‘Pamirskij 5’ × ‘Rubira’	P × R	INRA - Avignon	NC.	F2	96	FD(1), MD(3), FDP(1), PSC(3), TA(3), SSC(3)	[58]
‘IF7310828’ × (‘IF7310828’ x Ferganensis)	PxF	CREA - Rome	NC.	BC1	95	FD(7), MD(7), FDP(7), PSC(4), TA(4), SSC(4), FW(6)	[59]
‘Rubira’ × P. davidiana ‘P1908’	R × D	INRA - Avignon	NC.	F1	95	FD(1), MD(1), FDP(1), PSC(1), SSC(1)	[60]
‘Summergrand’ × P. davidiana ‘P1908’	SxD	INRA - Avignon	NC.	F1	67	FD(1), MD(1), FDP(1), PSC(1)	[61]
‘Texas’ × ‘Earlygold’ (‘MB1.37’)	T × E	IRTA - Lleida	NC.	F2	55	FD(2), MD(3), FDP(2), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	[62]
‘MB1.37’x’Earlygold’	T1E	IRTA - Lleida	NC.	BC1	105	FD(2), MD(3), FDP(2), TA(3), SSC(3), FW(3)	[26]
‘Zephyr’ × (‘Summergrand’ × P. davidiana ‘P1908’)	BC2	INRA - Avignon	NC.	BC2	129	FD(6), MD(7), FDP(5), PSC(4), TA(2), SSC(5), FW(6)	[55]

^aThose progenies derived exclusively from commercial parents were classified as commercial progenies (C) in contrast with the rest classified as non-commercial (NC) progenies
^bPhenotypes measured for each progeny: beginning of flowering time (FD), beginning of ripening time (MD), fruit development period (FDP), percentage of red overcolor on the fruit skin (PSC), titratable acidity of the fruit flesh (TA), soluble solid content of the fruit flesh (SSC) and weight of the whole fruit (FW). The number of years for which each trait was evaluated is indicated in parentheses

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcgenomics@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com