Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptomic analysis of the maize inbred line Chang7-2 and a large-grain mutant tc19

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 4 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Backgrounds

Grain size is a key factor in crop yield that gradually develops after pollination. However, few studies have reported gene expression patterns in maize grain development using large-grain mutants. To investigate the developmental mechanisms of grain size, we analyzed a large-grain mutant, named tc19, at the morphological and transcriptome level at five stages corresponding to days after pollination (DAP).

Results

After maturation, the grain length, width, and thickness in tc19 were greater than that in Chang7-2 (control) and increased by 3.57, 8.80, and 3.88%, respectively. Further analysis showed that grain width and 100-kernel weight in tc19 was lower than in Chang7-2 at 14 and 21 DAP, but greater than that in Chang7-2 at 28 DAP, indicating that 21 to 28 DAP was the critical stage for kernel width and weight development. For all five stages, the concentrations of auxin and brassinosteroids were significantly higher in tc19 than in Chang7-2. Gibberellin was higher at 7, 14, and 21 DAP, and cytokinin was higher at 21 and 35 DAP, in tc19 than in Chang7-2. Through transcriptome analysis at 14, 21, and 28 DAP, we identified 2987, 2647 and 3209 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between tc19 and Chang7-2. By using KEGG analysis, 556, 500 and 633 DEGs at 14, 21 and 28 DAP were pathway annotated, respectively, 77 of them are related to plant hormone signal transduction pathway. ARF3, AO2, DWF4 and XTH are higher expressed in tc19 than that in Chang7-2.

Conclusions

We found some DEGs in maize grain development by using Chang7-2 and a large-grain mutant tc19. These DEGs have potential application value in improving maize performance.

Peer Review reports

Background

Maize is an important human food, livestock feed, and bioenergy crop of great economic significance. Global maize production reached 1.1 billion tons in 2019 according to the Food and Agriculture Organization, providing a significant amount of food, feed, and bioenergy raw materials. The number of ears per unit area, number of grains per ear, and grain weight are the three main factors of maize yield [1]. Among these, grain weight is the primary factor affecting yield, because decreased grain weight cannot be compensated for by other yield factors. Grain size and filling degree are the main factors that affect grain weight, and thus grain size is an important trait affecting grain weight.

Maize seeds are composed of an embryo, endosperm, and seed coat. The maize embryo includes the germ, germ sheath, hypocotyl, radicle, sheath, and shield. The maize endosperm accounts for more than 80% of the volume and dry weight of the whole seed and is the most important component of maize seeds. The weight and quality of maize seeds are determined by the development, proliferation, and enrichment of endosperm cells. The maize endosperm is developed by the fusion of a male gamete with two polar nuclei. Maize endosperm development includes several stages: primary endosperm nuclear division, syncyte stage, syncyte cytochemistry, mitotic boom stage, nutrient storage stage, and dehydration and maturation stage [2].

Some genes associated with maize grain development have been identified using mutants. Opaque2 encodes endosperm specific transcription factor. Opaque2 functions in the expression of 22 KDa zeins [3]. Shrunken 1 has a role in sucrose synthetase, the starch content in shrunken1 mutant endosperm is less than wildtype [4]. In addition, tens of genes in responding for maize defective kernel mutants have been cloned. Dek2 encodes a pentatricopeptide repeat protein which functions in nad1 mRNA splicing [5]. Dek15 affects kernel development by encoding the cohesion-loading complex subunit SCC4 [6]. Dek35 encodes a PPR protein that affects cis-splicing of mitochondrial nad4 intron1 [7]. Dek44 encodes mitochondrial ribosomal protein L9 [8]. Embryo defective 14 encodes a plastid-targeted cGTPase essential for embryogenesis [9]. Recently, one study found that the maize Big Grain 1 Homolog 1 (ZM-BG1H1) overexpression is associated with increased ear kernel row number and total ear kernel number and mass [10]. In the case of maize grain development, most studies focused on small-grain mutants, only a few studies used large-grain mutants.

Grain development is a complex process regulated by plant hormones [11]. Genes associated with auxin, brassinolide, cytokinin, abscisic acid, and gibberellin are crucial for grain size. At present, many plant hormone–related genes have been identified to play critical roles in grain development. Maize ARGOS8 negatively regulates ethylene responses. Overexpressing ARGOS8 reduced ethylene sensitivity and improved grain yield under drought stress conditions [12]. The transcription factor basic region/leucine zipper motif 53 (bZIP53) expression significantly promoted the expression of cellulose synthase gene 1 (CesA1) which is involved in kernel development regulated by gibberellin [13]. NEEDLE1 encodes an ATP-dependent metalloprotease which alters endogenous auxin levels. needle1 displays severe reproductive defects [14].

RNA sequencing is an efficient transcriptomic technology [15]. Many genes have been identified as being involved in grain development [16, 17]. However, few studies have used large-grain mutants. Chang 7-2 is one of the maize elite inbred lines in China and has made great contributions to the cultivation of high-yield maize hybrids. tc19 is a large-grain mutant that was selected from Chang7-2 following Co60 gamma-ray radiation. By using RNA sequencing, we analyzed the transcriptomic differences between tc19 and Chang7-2 and identified potential genes related to grain development.

Results

Grain size and grain weight

To elucidate the consequence of mutations on grain size development, we performed morphological analysis using tc19 and Chang7-2 in two locations for 2 years. We found that the length, width, thickness, and 100-kernel weight of the mature seeds of tc19 were significantly greater than in Chang7-2 (Table 1). Grain length in tc19 increased by 3.57%, grain width increased by 8.8%, and grain thickness increased by 3.88% compared with Chang7-2. The grain volume and 100-kernel weight of tc19 increased by 18.75 and 16.92%, respectively. However, ear length and ear weight in tc19 were significantly lower than in Chang7-2 (Table 1).

Table 1 Grains develop differently between Chang7-2 and tc19
Full size table

Environmental factors have a great influence on plant growth and development. In this study, the grain length, grain width, grain thickness, and 100-kernel weight of Chang7-2 and tc19 were influenced significantly by the environment. However, the grain length, grain width, grain thickness, and 100-kernel weight of tc19 were significantly greater than those of Chang7-2 in every environment (Fig. 1), indicating that grain size is mainly controlled by genetic factors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The differences in grain size between Chang7-2 and tc19. A and B Photographs of ears and grains of Chang7-2 and tc19. C-F Statistic analysis for grain size between Chang7-2 and tc19. ns, not significant. Values are the mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. 50 biological replicates were used for grain length, grain width, grain thickness and 100-kernel weight

Full size image

Grain width changed most obviously between the mature seeds of tc19 and Chang7-2. To determine the stage at which this difference occurred, we measured the grain width from 14 to 28 days after pollination (DAP) every 7 days. Before 21 DAP, the grain width of tc19 was significantly smaller than that of Chang7-2. However, after 28 DAP, the grain width of tc19 was significantly larger than that of Chang7-2. The grain width of tc19 increased rapidly from 14 to 28 DAP, which ultimately contributed to the difference between tc19 and Chang7-2 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Grain development of Chang7-2 and tc19 at different DAPs. A Photograph showing the difference between Chang7-2 and tc19 at different DAPs. B Statistical analysis of grain width between Chang7-2 and tc19 at different DAPs. C Statistical analysis of grain width between Chang7-2 and tc19 at different DAPs. D Statistical analysis of grain thickness of Chang7-2 and tc19. E Statistical analysis of 100-kernel weight of Chang7-2 and tc19. Values are the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. Three biological replicates were used for grain length, grain width, grain thickness and 100-kernel weight

Full size image

Endogenous hormones

Plant endogenous hormones, indole-3-acetic acid (Auxin), gibberellins (GAs), cytokinin (CTK) and brassinosteroids (BR), play important roles in the regulation of seed size. To elucidate the effects of hormones between tc19 and Chang7-2, we detected the concentrations of mixed hormones at five stages after pollination (Table S1). The concentrations of auxin and BR in tc19 were higher than those in Chang7-2 at all five stages (Fig. 3). The concentration of auxin in tc19 peaked at 21 DAP, following which it decreased slightly at 28 and 35 DAP. The concentration of auxin in Chang7-2 also peaked at 21 DAP, reaching its lowest level at 28 DAP and then increasing slightly at 35 DAP (Fig. 3A). The concentration of GA decreased in tc19 but increased in Chang7-2 from 7 to 35 DAP. The concentration of GA in tc19 was significantly higher than that in Chang7-2 from 7 to 21 DAP and was no longer significant after 28 DAP (Fig. 3B). The concentration of CTK in tc19 was higher than that in Chang7-2 at 21 DAP, but it was not significantly different at 7, 14, 28, and 35 DAP (Fig. 3C). The concentration pattern of BR was similar to that of auxin (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The concentration of hormones at different DAPs. A The concentration of auxin at different DAPs. B The concentration of GA at different DAPs. C The concentration of CTK at different DAPs. D The concentration of BR at different DAPs. Values are the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. Three biological replicates were used

Full size image

Sequencing data quality assessment

First, all of the parameters for RNA quality met the library construction standards. After Illumina sequencing, we generated 20-35 M reads for the samples (Table 2). Q30 for all the samples ranged from 93.8 to 94.7%, the GC content ranged from 52.76 to 56.22% (Table S2). After alignment, more than 70% of the reads in each sample were aligned to the reference B73 genome sequence (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0) (Table 2). PCA analysis successfully classified samples into different groups (Fig. S1). The pearson correlation among different groups were higher than 0.97 (Fig. S2). These results confirmed that the data were reliable.

Table 2 Large amounts of reads generated from samples
Full size table

Differential gene statistics

We then screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Chang7-2 and tc19 at three stages after pollination. There were 2987, 2647, and 3209 DEGs at 14, 21, and 28 DAP, respectively. Compared with Chang7-2, 1201 genes increased and 1786 genes decreased in tc19 at 14 DAP. A total of 1647 genes increased and 1000 genes decreased in tc19 at 21 DAP, and 1995 genes increased and 1214 genes decreased in tc19 at 28 DAP (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The number of differently expressed genes at 14, 21 and 28 DAP

Full size image

Gene ontology (GO) analysis

To know the function of the DEGs, we performed GO analysis (Fig. 5). The cellular components involved at 14 DAP include lipid particle, extracellular region, nucleus, cell wall, proteasome core complex, microtubule associated complex, external encapsulating structure. The molecular functions at 14 DAP are hydrolase activity, tetrapyrrole binding, DNA binding, transcription cofactor activity. The biological processes at 14 DAP include DNA duplex unwinding, carbohydrate metabolic process, axis specification and others (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Histograms of GO classifications at different DAPs. A GO classifications of Chang7-2 and tc19 at 14 DAP. B GO classifications of Chang7-2 and tc19 at 21DAP. C GO classifications of Chang7-2 and tc19 at 28DAP

Full size image

The cellular components at 21 DAP include chromatin, extracellular region, chromosomal part, cell periphery et al. The molecular function of the DEGs at 21 DAP are related to oxidoreductase activity, protein dimerization activity, oxidoreductase activity, endopeptidase inhibitor activity et al. The biological processes of the DEGs at 21 DAP include transcription, nucleic acid-templated transcription, response to heat, regulation of hydrolase activity et al. (Fig. 5B).

The cellular components of the DEGs at 28 DAP include extracellular region, cell periphery, proteasome core complex, plasma membrane et al. The molecular function of the DEGs at 28 DAP are involved in oxidoreductase activity, tetrapyrrole binding, catalytic activity, peptidase regulator activity et al. The biological processes of the DEGs at 28 DAP include peptidase activity, proteolysis, hydrolase activity, catalytic activity et al. (Fig. 5C).

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes enrichment (KEGG) analysis

To determine the biochemical metabolic pathways and signal transduction pathways associated with the DEGs, we performed KEGG analysis. 556, 500 and 633 DEGs at 14, 21 and 28 DAP were pathway annotated, respectively. The DEGs at 14 DAP were enriched mainly in the phenylpropane biosynthesis pathway, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylalanine metabolism, and starch sucrose metabolism pathway (Fig. 6A). The DEGs at 21 DAP were enriched mainly in endoplasmic reticulum protein processing, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and α-linolenic acid metabolic pathways (Fig. 6B). The DEGs at 28 DAP were enriched mainly in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, brassinosteroid synthesis, and α-linolenic acid metabolism (Fig. 6C). Above all, the DEGs in the hormone signal transduction pathway were significantly enriched. This indicated that the signal transduction pathway may play an important role in seed development.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Clusters of KEGG classifications at different DAPs. A Clusters of KEGG classification at 14 DAP. B Clusters of KEGG classification at 21 DAP. C Clusters of KEGG classification at 28 DAP

Full size image

Genes enriched in hormone signal transduction

We found a total of 77 DEGs related to the hormone signal transduction pathway (Fig. 7A). Among them, 27 genes were involved in the IAA signal transduction pathway; 5 genes were involved in the BR signal transduction pathway; 7 genes were involved in the CTK signal transduction pathway; 2 genes were involved in the GA signal transduction pathway; 6 genes were involved the abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction pathway; 9 genes were involved in the ethylene (ET) signal transduction pathway; 11 genes were involved in the jasmonic acid (JA) signal transduction pathway; and 10 genes were involved in the SA signal transduction pathway.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The expression of several hormone-related genes. A The number of DEGs related to hormones. B The expression of ARF3. C The expression of IAA5. D The expression of AO2. E The expression of DWF4. F The expression of XTH. Values are the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. Three biological replicates were used

Full size image

We detected 27 DEGs involved in the IAA signal transduction pathway. ARF3 (Zm00001d012731) and IAA15 (Zm00001d039624) showed high expression levels. The expression level of ARF3 in tc19 was higher than that in Chang7-2. From 14 to 28 DAP, the expression of ARF3 was significantly increased in tc19, whereas it increased only slightly in Chang7-2 (Fig. 7B). The expression of IAA15 in Chang7-2 was higher than that of tc19 (Fig. 7C). AO2 (Zm00001d034388) in tc19 was higher than that in Chang7-2 (Fig. 7D). Endogenous hormone analysis showed that the BR concentrations of Chang7-2 and tc19 differed significantly. Analysis of the BR biosynthesis pathway indicated that DWF4 (ZM00001d003349) and XTH (Zm00001d014617) were highly expressed in tc19 than in Chang7-2 (Fig. 7E and F).

Discussion

In this study, we used the tc19 maize mutant, which had been screened after Co60-γ-ray irradiation and had been self-pollinated for multiple generations on the background of a maize inbred line Chang7-2. the grain length, grain width, grain thickness, and 100-kernel weight of tc19 were significantly increased, whereas the ear length and grain weight were reduced, comparing with Chang7-2. Kernel number per grain, 100-kernel weight, and ear number are critical components of maize yield. The phenomenon of improved grain weight with reduced yield has been observed previously [18]. Some quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been found to affect the balance between the kernel and ear [19, 20]. Thus, the relationship between kernel, ear per plant, and field conditions should be carefully considered in plant breeding.

The grain type and grain weight of maize seeds are controlled by both genetic and environmental factors, such as temperature, moisture, disease, and insect pests. To explore the difference between the grain development of Chang7-2 and tc19, we analyzed grain length, grain width, grain thickness, and 100-kernel weight under multiple different environmental conditions. The results showed that environments have an effect on grain size. However, the grain size and weight of tc19 under each environmental condition were always higher than that in Chang7-2, indicating that grain development is mainly genetically controlled. This is consistent with previous studies [21].

In this study, grain width was the main contributor to the difference in grain size between Chang7-2 and tc19. The grain width increased fastest in tc19 from 14 to 28 DAP, at which stage it exceeded Chang7-2, indicating that the stage of 14 to 28 DAP is an important period for grain enlargement. Some studies showed that this period is the grain-filling stage which is critical for grain width development [22].

Plant hormones are one of the most important factors affecting the growth and development of grains [23, 24]. Cytokinin and brassinolide play a vital role in regulating seed size, auxin, ABA, and gibberellin have regulatory effects on seed development to a certain extent [25]. Through transcriptomics analysis, we found that the signal transduction pathway has a notable influence on grain size. Five genes had exhibited high expression levels in this study, including ARF3, IAA15, AO2, DWF4, and XTH. ARF3, IAA15. AO2 are related to the IAA biosynthesis or signal transduction pathway, and DWF4 and XTH are related to the BR biosynthesis or signal transduction pathway [26].

The Aux/IAA protein, as a type of transcription inhibitor, has been proven to play an important role in the auxin signal transduction pathway. Generally, the auxin response requires the degradation of the Aux/IAA inhibitor. After that, the ARF transcription factor can be released to regulate the target genes. ARF3 belongs to the ARF family [27] while IAA15 is a member of the AUX/IAA family [28]. In Chang7-2, the expression of ARF3 is very low while IAA15 is high expressed. However, in tc19, the expression of ARF3 is much higher. Indicating that ARF is released in tc19, which is consistent with the previous study. AO2 encodes 3-indole acetaldehyde oxidase, a key enzyme in the indolepyruvate pathway [29]. In this study, the expression of the AO2 gene in tc19 was higher than that in Chang7-2, which is consistent with the endogenous IAA measurement results.

DWF4 encodes sterol C-22α hydroxylase, which acts as the rate-limiting link in the process of BR biosynthesis. A high expression of DWF4 increases the BR content in grains [30]. In this study, the expression level of DWF4 in tc19 was higher than that in Chang7-2, which is consistent with the higher BR content in tc19. XTH encodes xyloglucan endotransglycosidase/hydrolase, which is a cell wall relaxase and a key enzyme in plant cell wall remodeling. Studies have shown that XTHs play roles in cell volume growth, and their expression is induced by BR [31]. The higher expression level of XTH is consistent with the higher BR content in tc19.

In addition to the genes related to auxin and brassinolide, some genes related to other hormones were differentially expressed between Chang7-2 and tc19. We propose that auxin and brassinolide contribute significantly to the enlarged size of the tc19 grains. The molecular regulatory mechanism of plant seed size is complex, and many genes are waiting to be identified in this process. To study the regulatory mechanisms of seed size, genes needs to be cloned and functionally characterized.

Conclusion

The grain width and 100-kernel weight in tc19 are greater than that in Chang7-2. The concentrations of IAA, BR, GA and CTK were higher in tc19 than in Chang7-2. 2987, 2647, and 3209 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified between tc19 and Chang7-2 at 14, 21, and 28 DAP, respectively. GO and KEGG analysis found that 77 DEGs are enriched in the plant hormone signal transduction pathway. The expression of ARF3, IAA15, AO2, DWF4 and XTH may explain the grain developmental difference between tc19 and Chang7-2.

Methods

Plant growth and phenotyping

The seeds of Chang7-2 were obtained from the maize center of Qingdao Agricultural University. tc19 was originally generated after Co60-γ radiation on Chang7-2 background in the Song lab in Qingdao Agricultural University. The permission of seeds collection has been obtained. Chang7-2 and tc19 were sown in Sanya (SY, 18°30′N, 108°47′E) in 2014 and 2015, and Jiaozhou (JZ, 36°04′N, 120°18′E) in 2015 and 2016. Single seeds were sown with a 3-m row length, 0.6-m row spacing, and 0.2-m plant spacing, with 10 rows per material under normal field management practices. All plants were self-pollinated. Cobs were taken at 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days, and 35 days after pollination. Grains were isolated from the center of the cobs at the same growth stage. For each treatment, three cobs were selected, and when the maize was mature, they were single-ear harvested and dried naturally to a water content of about 13%. Afterward, at least three ears were selected for measurement. Grains at the same growth stage and of the same shape were selected for measurement of kernel length, width, thickness, and 100-kernel weight. The data were analyzed using Excel 2016 and Graphpad Prism 8. We declare that all the collections of plant and seed specimens related to this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China.

Determination of endogenous hormone content

The maize inbred lines Chang7-2 and tc19 were sown in the Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Demonstration Park of Qingdao Agricultural University in 2016. After tasseling, they were all self-pollinated. Cobs were sampled at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 DAP. Grains were isolated from the center of the cobs at the same growth stage, and more than three cobs were sampled for each treatment. Hormones were tested by using Auxin Elisa Kit, GA ELISA Kit, BR Elisa Kit and BR Elisa Kit.

Samples of 0.2 to 0.5 g were rinsed in ice-cold PBS (0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl, pH = 7.4), wiped dry with filter paper, weighed accurately, and placed into a 5 ml homogenization tube. Four times the volume of homogenization medium was added to the tube at the ratio of weight (mg): volume (ml) 1:4, and the tissue was cut as soon as possible using small ophthalmic scissors in an ice water bath. A masher was used for grinding the tissue at 10000 to 15,000 r/min. A small amount of tissue homogenate was used for smearing, broken cells were observed under a microscope. The sample was then centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 to 15 min, and the supernatant was used for determination.

First, set the blank wells and sample wells a plate. Forty microliters of sample diluent were added to each well, following which 10 μl of the sample solution was added. Fifty microliters of conjugate reagent was added to each well, except for the blank wells. The plate was sealed with closure plate membrane and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, the liquid was discarded. Each well was filled with the washing solution and incubated for 30 s, then, the washing solution was discarded. This step was repeated 5 times. Fifty microliters of chromogen solution A and chromogen solution B were added to the wells, the plate was gently mixed, incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the dark. Then, 50 μl of stop solution was added to each well. Finally, the OD value at 450 nm wavelength of each well was measured using a microtiter plate reader.

Taking the concentration of the standard substance as the ordinate (Y) and the OD value of our samples as the abscissa (X), we calculated the polynomial quadratic regression equation of the standard curve. The quadratic regression equation of each hormone was as follows:

$${\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\mathrm{Gibberellin}\ \left(\mathrm{GA}\right):\mathrm{Y}=0.4303+34.5196\mathrm{X};\\ {}\mathrm{Auxin}\ \left(\mathrm{IAA}\right):\mathrm{Y}=-1.6192+32.3868\mathrm{X};\\ {}\mathrm{Cytokinin}\ \left(\mathrm{CTK}\right):\mathrm{Y}=1.1722+21.0967\mathrm{X};\\ {}\mathrm{Brassinolide}\ \left(\mathrm{BR}\right):\mathrm{Y}=6.8315+83.9345\mathrm{X}.\end{array}}$$

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol according to the standard protocol. The grains were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen and placed in a 2 ml Eppendorf tube. One thousand five hundred microliters of the extraction reagent TRNzol-A+ were added, vortexed thoroughly and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was transferred to a new RNase-free 2 ml Eppendorf tube. Three hundred milliliters of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added and mixed, incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 12000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min, and then 500 μl of the supernatant was transferred to a new RNase-free centrifuge tube. Five hundred microliters isopropanol (pre-cooled at − 20 °C) was added to the tube, mixed well and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. After centrifugated at 12000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded. One milliliter of pre-cooled 75% ethanol was added to the centrifuge tube, shaken gently and centrifuged at 4 °C and 12,000 rpm for 3 min. When the ethanol had evaporated, 40 μl of RNase-free water was added and mixed by pipetting. RNA quality was assessed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and checked using RNase free agarose gel electrophoresis.

Library construction and sequencing

The enriched mRNA was fragmented into short fragments using fragmentation buffer and reversly transcribed into cDNA by using NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB #7530, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The purified double-stranded cDNA fragments were end repaired, base A added, and ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters. The ligation reaction was purified with the AMPure XP Beads(1.0X). The Ligated fragments were subjected to size selection by agarose gel electrophoresis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified. The resulting cDNA library was sequenced using Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. (Guangzhou, China).

Alignment with reference genome

The sequencing data analysis was performed by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. (Guangzhou, China). The raw image data measured by the Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 was converted into sequence data by using the Base Calling. Reads with more than 10% of unknown nucleotides and low-quality reads containing more than 50% of low quality (Q-value≤20) bases were removed. The clean reads were aligned and assembled to the maize B73 reference genome (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0) by using TopHat2 and Cufflinks, respectively. The genome data was downloaded from Ensembl Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org/Zea_mays/Info/Index).

Gene expression analysis

The mapped reads of each sample were reconstructed into transcripts by using StringTie v1.3.1. For each transcription region, a FPKM (fragment per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) value was calculated to quantify its expression abundance and variations, using RSEM software. Correlation analysis was performed by R. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with R package gmodels (http://www.rproject.org/). RNAs differential expression analysis was performed by edgeR between two samples. The genes/transcripts with the parameter of false discovery rate (FDR) below 0.05 and absolute fold change≥2 were considered differentially expressed genes/transcripts.

GO enrichment analysis

The DEGs were mapped to each term in the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/) and the number of genes in each term with GO functions and gene item statistics were calculated. A hypergeometric test was performed to determine the GO entries that were significantly enriched in the DEGs.

Pathway enrichment analysis

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is the main public database on pathways. Pathway-significant enrichment analysis uses KEGG pathways as the unit and applies hypergeometric tests to determine pathways that are significantly enriched in DEGs compared with the entire genome background.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequence data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository. The accession number is PRJNA724904, the website link is https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA724904. All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included in the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

DAP:

Days after pollination

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

BR:

Brassinosteroids

GAs:

Gibberellins

CTK:

Cytokinin

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

ARF3:

AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 3

IAA15:

Auxin-responsive protein IAA15

AO2:

Aldehyde oxidase 2

DWF4:

Dwarf4

XTH:

Xyloglucan endotransglycosidase/hydrolase

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis

References

  1. Lu X, Zhou Z, Yuan Z, Zhang C, Hao Z, Wang Z, et al. Genetic dissection of the general combining ability of yield-related traits in maize. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00788 PMID: 32793248; PMCID: PMC7387702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen OA. The modular control of cereal endosperm development. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(3):279–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.003 Epub 2020 Jan 16. PMID: 31956036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Z, Zheng X, Yang J, Messing J, Wu Y. Maize endosperm-specific transcription factors O2 and PBF network the regulation of protein and starch synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(39):10842–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613721113 Epub 2016 Sep 12. PMID: 27621432; PMCID: PMC5047157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb BG, Hannah LC. Shrunken-1 encoded sucrose synthase is not required for sucrose synthesis in the maize endosperm. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(4):1219–21. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.4.1219 PMID: 16666447; PMCID: PMC1055744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Qi W, Yang Y, Feng X, Zhang M, Song R. Mitochondrial function and maize kernel development requires Dek2, a pentatricopeptide repeat protein involved in nad1 mRNA splicing. Genetics. 2017;205(1):239–49. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.196105 Epub 2016 Nov 4. PMID: 27815362; PMCID: PMC5223505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He Y, Wang J, Qi W, Song R. Maize Dek15 encodes the cohesin-loading complex subunit SCC4 and is essential for chromosome segregation and kernel development. Plant Cell. 2019;31(2):465–85. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00921 Epub 2019 Jan 31. PMID: 30705131; PMCID: PMC6447020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Feng F, Qi W, Xu L, Yao D, Wang Q, et al. Dek35 encodes a PPR protein that affects cis-splicing of mitochondrial nad4 intron 1 and seed development in maize. Mol Plant. 2017;10(3):427–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.08.008 Epub 2016 Sep 3. PMID: 27596292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Qi W, Lu L, Huang S, Song R. Maize Dek44 encodes mitochondrial ribosomal protein L9 and is required for seed development. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(4):2106–19. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00546 Epub 2019 Jun 10. PMID: 31182559; PMCID: PMC6670089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li C, Shen Y, Meeley R, McCarty DR, Tan BC. Embryo defective 14 encodes a plastid-targeted cGTPase essential for embryogenesis in maize. Plant J. 2015;84(4):785–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13045 PMID: 26771182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons CR, Weers BP, Reimann KS, Abbitt SE, Frank MJ, Wang W, et al. Maize BIG GRAIN1 homolog overexpression increases maize grain yield. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(11):2304–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13392 Epub 2020 Jun 16. PMID: 32356392; PMCID: PMC7589417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Figueiredo DD, Köhler C. Auxin: a molecular trigger of seed development. Genes Dev. 2018;32(7-8):479–90. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.312546.118 PMID: 29692356; PMCID: PMC5959232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, Lafitte HR, Archibald RL, Yang M, et al. ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(2):207–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12603 Epub 2016 Aug 17. PMID: 27442592; PMCID: PMC5258859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lv H, Li X, Li H, Hu Y, Liu H, Wen S, et al. Gibberellin induced transcription factor bZIP53 regulates CesA1 expression in maize kernels. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0244591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244591 PMID: 33730027; PMCID: PMC7968625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Q, Galli M, Liu X, Federici S, Buck A, Cody J, et al. NEEDLE1 encodes a mitochondria localized ATP-dependent metalloprotease required for thermotolerant maize growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(39):19736–42. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907071116 Epub 2019 Sep 9. PMID: 31501327; PMCID: PMC6765280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu X, Crow M, Rice BR, Li F, Harris B, Liu L, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of developing maize ears facilitates functional analysis and trait candidate gene discovery. Dev Cell. 2021;56(4):557–568.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.12.015 Epub 2021 Jan 4. PMID: 33400914; PMCID: PMC7904613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Du X, Fang T, Liu Y, Huang L, Zang M, Wang G, et al. Transcriptome profiling predicts new genes to promote maize callus formation and transformation. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01633 PMID: 31921272; PMCID: PMC6934073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Doll NM, Just J, Brunaud V, Caïus J, Grimault A, Depège-Fargeix N, et al. Transcriptomics at maize embryo/endosperm interfaces identifies a transcriptionally distinct endosperm subdomain adjacent to the embryo scutellum. Plant Cell. 2020;32(4):833–52. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00756 Epub 2020 Feb 21. PMID: 32086366; PMCID: PMC7145466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhai H, Feng Z, Du X, Song Y, Liu X, Qi Z, et al. A novel allele of TaGW2-A1 is located in a finely mapped QTL that increases grain weight but decreases grain number in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(3):539–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-3017-y Epub 2017 Nov 17. PMID: 29150697; PMCID: PMC5814529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huo D, Ning Q, Shen X, Liu L, Zhang Z. QTL mapping of kernel number-related traits and validation of one major QTL for ear length in maize. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155506 PMID: 27176215; PMCID: PMC4866764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Lin Z, Zhang X, Liu H, Zhou L, Zhong S, et al. krn1, a major quantitative trait locus for kernel row number in maize. New Phytol. 2019;223(3):1634–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15890 Epub 2019 Jun 6. PMID: 31059135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Feria RA, Licht MA, Ordóñez RA, Hatfield JL, Coulter JA, Archontoulis SV. Evaluating maize and soybean grain dry-down in the field with predictive algorithms and genotype-by-environment analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43653-1 PMID: 31073235; PMCID: PMC6509253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J, Zeng B, Zhang M, Xie S, Wang G, Hauck A, et al. Dynamic transcriptome landscape of maize embryo and endosperm development. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(1):252–64. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.240689 Epub 2014 Jul 18. PMID: 25037214; PMCID: PMC4149711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Penfield S. Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Biol. 2017;27(17):R874–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.050 PMID: 28898656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ge F, Luo X, Huang X, Zhang Y, He X, Liu M, et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factors involved in maize embryonic callus formation. Physiol Plant. 2016;158(4):452–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12470 Epub 2016 Jun 9. PMID: 27194582.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen L, Li YX, Li C, Shi Y, Song Y, Zhang D, et al. The retromer protein ZmVPS29 regulates maize kernel morphology likely through an auxin-dependent process(es). Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(4):1004–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13267 Epub 2019 Oct 17. PMID: 31553822; PMCID: PMC7061865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shahnejat-Bushehri S, Tarkowska D, Sakuraba Y, Balazadeh S. Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor JUB1 regulates GA/BR metabolism and signalling. Nat Plants. 2016;2:16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.13 PMID: 27249348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vial-Pradel S, Keta S, Nomoto M, Luo L, Takahashi H, Suzuki M, et al. Arabidopsis zinc-finger-like protein ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 (AS2) and two nucleolar proteins maintain gene body DNA methylation in the leaf polarity gene ETTIN (ARF3). Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59(7):1385–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy031 PMID: 29415182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SH, Bahk S, An J, Hussain S, Nguyen NT, Do HL, et al. A gain-of-function mutant of IAA15 inhibits lateral root development by transcriptional repression of LBD genes in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01239 PMID: 32903377; PMCID: PMC7434933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Seo M, Akaba S, Oritani T, Delarue M, Bellini C, Caboche M, et al. Higher activity of an aldehyde oxidase in the auxin-overproducing superroot1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(2):687–93. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.687 PMID: 9489015; PMCID: PMC35127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Choe S, Dilkes BP, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Sakurai A, Feldmann KA. The DWF4 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a cytochrome P450 that mediates multiple 22alpha-hydroxylation steps in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1998;10(2):231–43. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.2.231 PMID: 9490746; PMCID: PMC143988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Sandt VS, Guisez Y, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase (XTH) is encoded by a multi-gene family in the primitive vascular land plant Selaginella kraussiana. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007;9(1):142–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-924661 Epub 2006 Nov 13. PMID: 17099842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the colleagues in our laboratory, and thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31201218), and Taishan Scholars Project (NO. tsqn201909134).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yanrong Zhang and Fuchao Jiao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China

    Yanrong Zhang, Fuchao Jiao, Jun Li, Yuhe Pei, Xiyun Song & Xinmei Guo

  2. Key Laboratory of Major Crop Germplasm Innovation and Application in Qingdao, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China

    Yanrong Zhang, Fuchao Jiao, Jun Li, Yuhe Pei, Meiai Zhao, Xiyun Song & Xinmei Guo

  3. College of Life Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, Shandong, China

    Meiai Zhao

Authors
  1. Yanrong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fuchao Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuhe Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meiai Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiyun Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinmei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XG and XS designed the study. YZ performed the experiments. YZ and FJ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiyun Song or Xinmei Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We declare that all the collections of plant and seed specimens related to this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) of the People’s Republic of China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Figure S1.

The samples classified into different groups based on PCA analysis.

Additional file 2. Figure S2.

High correlation between each of the two samples.

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Different hormones concentrations between Chang7-2 and tc19.

Additional file 4: Table S2.

High quality of RNA samples.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Jiao, F., Li, J. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the maize inbred line Chang7-2 and a large-grain mutant tc19. BMC Genomics 23, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08230-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08230-9

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us