Skip to main content

Table 1 Significant and suggestive QTL for resistance to IPN

From: Confirmation and fine-mapping of a major QTL for resistance to infectious pancreatic necrosis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): population-level associations between markers and trait

Linkage group

Position (cM)

F

No of informative parents

Chromosome-wise p-value

Proportion of phenotypic variance

21

6

43.34†

19

≈ 0†

24.6%

4

9

2.44*

20

0.001

0.9%

13

18

2.37

18

0.003

0.9%

22

65

2.31

19

0.007

0.9%

10

27

2.26

19

0.008

0.8%

17a

1

2.25

18

0.004

0.8%

25

7

2.21

19

0.003

0.8%

2

49

2.08

20

0.010

0.7%

11

44

2.04

19

0.009

0.7%

3

31

2.02

20

0.005

0.7%

17b

14

2.00

17

0.018

0.6%

12

0

1.82

20

0.049

0.5%

28

1

1.79

19

0.047

0.5%

24

0

1.78

19

0.024

0.5%

16

0

1.61

20

0.045

0.4%

  1. *P < 0.05 (genome-wide)
  2. †P ≈ 0 (P-value too low to be determined by permutation testing)
  3. QTL were defined as suggestive if they were chromosome-wise significant at P < 0.05, while not experiment-wise significant at P < 0.05. The F ratio has degrees of freedom equal to the number of informative parents and the number of records (offspring) minus two times the number of informative parents [38]; the latter ranging from 3177 to 3737 depending on the number of marker-informative offspring. The proportion of phenotypic variance is the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL, after correction for selective genotyping.