Skip to main content

Table 2 Presence of significant motif interactions in the three fly promoter classes

From: Complex organizational structure of the genome revealed by genome-wide analysis of single and alternative promoters in Drosophila melanogaster

 

Occurrence percentagea

p valueb

Motif interaction

UPs

FAPs

DAPs

UPs vs. FAPs

UPs vs. DAPs

FAPs vs. DAPs

TATA_INR/DMp1_DMp2

1.03

0.36

0.07

ns

1.57e-09

ns

INR_GAGA/DMp2_NDM1

0.28

0.82

0.91

1.43e-03

1.92e-05

ns

INR_NDM2/DMp2_NDM2

0.56

1.13

1.65

ns

5.84e-08

ns

DMv1_DRE/DMv1_NDM4

0.25

0.87

0.18

1.20e-04

ns

6.83e-04

DMv3_DRE/DMv3_NDM4

1.30

2.10

0.56

ns

5.66e-04

1.98e-06

DRE_E-box/NDM4_NDM5

0.97

0.77

0

ns

2.95e-11

1.33e-06

  1. apercentage of the promoters in a class having the specific motif interaction.
  2. bcalculated using Fisher's exact test. Holm's method was used for multiple hypothesis testing. ns, not significant.
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us