Skip to main content

Table 3 Presence of the eight human promoter motifs in the three promoter classes

From: Complex organizational structure of the genome revealed by genome-wide analysis of single and alternative promoters in Drosophila melanogaster

  Occurrence percentagea p valueb
Motif UPs FAPs DAPs UPs vs. FAPs UPs vs. DAPs FAPs vs. DAPs
CCAAT 12.25 10.16 9.78 ns ns ns
SP1 37.91 34.35 30.69 ns 1.33e-04 ns
CLUS1 1.82 0.81 0.50 ns ns ns
USF 2.76 1.94 1.61 ns ns ns
CREB 3.02 2.42 3.47 ns ns ns
TATA 6.60 1.94 3.22 6.97e-07 1.47e-04 ns
NRF-1 10.23 3.71 3.34 2.65e-08 1.89e-11 ns
ETS 17.28 5.97 6.44 1.07e-14 1.26e-16 ns
Nonec 33.59 51.77 53.59 3.75e-17 9.32e-25 ns
  1. apercentage of the promoters in a class having the specific motif.
  2. bcalculated using Fisher's exact test. Holm's method was used for multiple hypothesis testing. ns, not significant.
  3. cpercentage of promoters without any known motifs.