Skip to main content

Table 2 Main QTL effects, location and phenotypic variance explained by body composition traits in chicken lines divergently selected for low or high growth for combined sex.

From: Mapping main, epistatic and sex-specific QTL for body composition in a chicken population divergently selected for low or high growth rate

Chromosome

QTL Position (cM)

2Log BF1

Effect2

Variance explained by QTL effect

Breast meat yield

    

   7

87.0

6.77

49.17

3.01

Pectoralis major weight

    

   7

87.0

6.48

46.34

3.02

Pectoralis major yield

    

   7

83.0

8.07

80.13

7.00

Pectoralis minor weight

    

   3

78.7

2.21

-23.55

1.09

   4

14.0

4.02

28.66

1.08

   17

21.0

11.08

39.59

6.63

Pectoralis minor yield

    

   4

12.0

4.69

30.62

1.64

   17

21.0

11.30

38.11

6.17

Thigh + drumstick weight

    

   27

0.0

10.17

32.19

1.16

Thigh + drumstick yield

    

   27

0.0

10.73

24.55

1.34

Abdominal fat weight

    

   1

202.0

7.25

154.38

6.62

   2

276.0

6.66

-217.64

4.03

   5

101.4

8.63

-28.23

13.26

   7

2.1

11.13

128.13

13.74

   14

16.4

6.10

69.83

7.08

   15

30.8

5.39

-29.93

5.09

   18

14.9

9.34

-42.46

3.80

Abdominal fat yield

    

   1

424.5

4.04

47.29

2.26

   3

76.6

4.56

-21.28

1.10

   5

10.0

6.69

0.66

4.28

   9

12.0

3.95

27.06

1.71

   12

18.7

3.45

4.33

1.05

   27

0.0

8.26

14.04

1.97

  1. 1 Twice the log of the Bayes Factor 2Main effect of the QTL