Skip to main content

Table 6 Chimeric clones detected by BES alignment versus the genomic sequence (linkage groups between parentheses) and by counting putative intra-plate contaminations (high number of clones from a single plate, in parentheses, in the same contig)

From: Physical mapping in highly heterozygous genomes: a physical contig map of the Pinot Noir grapevine cultivar

Contig

Putative chimeric clone(s)

Detection method

E-value

(when merged)

14

1047_O11, 1040_J15

BES alignment (7, 14)

 

31

1101_K03, 2051_H20

BES alignment (2, 7)

 

61

1037_H06

BES alignment (4, 5)

 

329

2024_E09, 1093_O01

BES alignment (2, 18)

3e-25

458

1087_L01

BES alignment (1, 14)

 

552

2010_D07

BES alignment (2,18)

 

961

1038_L10

BES alignment (6, 16)

4e-37

994

1086_L13

BES alignment (4, 14)

3e-26

1424

1084_I11, 1099_A14

BES alignment (4, 16)

2e-25

2207

All clones from plate 1044

Intra-plate (1044)

 

2811

1039_G08, 1041_B15

BES alignment (18, 19), Intra-plate (1039)

 

3130

Uncertain

BES alignment (7, 10, 14)

Â