Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of map power for different panels using HUFS

From: Development of admixture mapping panels for African Americans from commercial high-density SNP arrays

Panel (# of AIMs)

# of AIMs used (% Passed QC) 1

Map power 2

Reference

Based on δ (2,076)

1,943 (100%)

0.73

This manuscript

Based on F ST (1,923)

1,800 (100%)

0.73

This manuscript

21 k random markers (21,637)

21,074 (100%)

0.65

This manuscript

2 k random markers (2,169)

2,100 (100%)

0.13

This manuscript

Tian 2000 (2,000)

321 (100%)

0.37

[28]

Tian 4222 (4,222)

682 (100%)

0.56

[28]

  1. 1 We compared the panels using all autosomal AIMs with quality control criteria locus call rate ≥ 95%, minor allele frequency > 0.01, and HWE p ≥ 1.0×10-3.
  2. 2 Map power (r avg ) based on 1,017 individuals in the HUFS data set.
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us