Table 2 Simulation results for Examples 1 and 2
From: A robust penalized method for the analysis of noisy DNA copy number data
| Â | Methods | AR(2) | AR(1) | Ind. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Example 1 | LAD-aFL | 5.225 (0.831)1 | 5.375 (0.806) | 4.750 (0.669) |
| Â | Â | 4.9252, 0.3003 | 4.975, 0.400 | 4.750, 0 |
| Â | LS-FL | 4.250 (1.149) | 4.750 (0.707) | 4.550 (0.959) |
| Â | Â | 4.250, 0 | 4.725, 0.025 | 4.525, 0.025 |
| Â | LAD-FL | 5.025 (0.479) | 4.975 (0.806) | 4.350 (1.167) |
| Â | Â | 4.850, 0.175 | 4.900, 0.075 | 4.275, 0.075 |
Example 2 | LAD-aFL | 5.275 (0.598) | 5.475 (0.784) | 4.925 (0.350) |
| Â | Â | 5.000, 0.275 | 4.925, 0.550 | 4.900, 0.025 |
| Â | LS-FL | 2.850 (1.189) | 3.750 (1.171) | 3.125 (1.362) |
| Â | Â | 2.850, 0 | 3.750, 0 | 3.125, 0 |
| Â | LAD-FL | 4.850 (0.533) | 4.800 (0.791) | 4.575 (0.874) |
| Â | Â | 4.850, 0 | 4.575, 0.225 | 4.450, 0.125 |