Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation between changes in gene expression in the twelve conditions

From: Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: a meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes

   CL CL CL SL SL SL CR CR CR SR SR SR
   EAR vs CTL LMI vs CTL LMO vs CTL EAR vs CTL LMI vs CTL LMO vs CTL EAR vs CTL LMI vs CTL LMO vs CTL EAR vs CTL LMI vs CTL LMO vs CTL
CL EAR vs CTL             
CL LMI vs CTL 0.381            
CL LMO vs CTL 0.204 0.613           
SL EAR vs CTL 0.430 -0.03 -0.14          
SL LMI vs CTL 0.015 ns 0.078 0.191 0.150         
SL LMO vs CTL 0.142 0.284 0.397 0.245 0.583        
CR EAR vs CTL 0.113 -0.01 ns -0.01 ns 0.064 0.146 0.101       
CR LMI vs CTL 0.163 0.157 0.072 0.073 0.147 0.150 0.663      
CR LMO vs CTL 0.159 0.077 0.023 0.080 0.073 0.092 0.650 0.775     
SR EAR vs CTL 0.040 -0.06 -0.02 0.066 0.166 0.109 0.756 0.443 0.323    
SR LMI vs CTL 0.176 0.172 0.005 ns 0.084 0.063 0.080 0.542 0.610 0.668 0.518   
SR LMO vs CTL 0.149 0.049 0.025 0.129 0.130 0.150 0.700 0.639 0.581 0.779 0.746  
  1. Pearson coefficient values between relative expression data (C: Carpaccio, S: Soligo; L: mature leaves, R: root apices; CTL, EAR, LMI, LMO: treatments). All given values are significant (P < 0.0001; N = 36,687 probesets) unless specified otherwise by ns (non significant).