Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation between changes in gene expression in the twelve conditions

From: Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: a meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes

  

CL

CL

CL

SL

SL

SL

CR

CR

CR

SR

SR

SR

  

EAR vs CTL

LMI vs CTL

LMO vs CTL

EAR vs CTL

LMI vs CTL

LMO vs CTL

EAR vs CTL

LMI vs CTL

LMO vs CTL

EAR vs CTL

LMI vs CTL

LMO vs CTL

CL

EAR vs CTL

            

CL

LMI vs CTL

0.381

           

CL

LMO vs CTL

0.204

0.613

          

SL

EAR vs CTL

0.430

-0.03

-0.14

         

SL

LMI vs CTL

0.015 ns

0.078

0.191

0.150

        

SL

LMO vs CTL

0.142

0.284

0.397

0.245

0.583

       

CR

EAR vs CTL

0.113

-0.01 ns

-0.01 ns

0.064

0.146

0.101

      

CR

LMI vs CTL

0.163

0.157

0.072

0.073

0.147

0.150

0.663

     

CR

LMO vs CTL

0.159

0.077

0.023

0.080

0.073

0.092

0.650

0.775

    

SR

EAR vs CTL

0.040

-0.06

-0.02

0.066

0.166

0.109

0.756

0.443

0.323

   

SR

LMI vs CTL

0.176

0.172

0.005 ns

0.084

0.063

0.080

0.542

0.610

0.668

0.518

  

SR

LMO vs CTL

0.149

0.049

0.025

0.129

0.130

0.150

0.700

0.639

0.581

0.779

0.746

 
  1. Pearson coefficient values between relative expression data (C: Carpaccio, S: Soligo; L: mature leaves, R: root apices; CTL, EAR, LMI, LMO: treatments). All given values are significant (P < 0.0001; N = 36,687 probesets) unless specified otherwise by ns (non significant).
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us