Skip to main content

Table 5 Development of PVY-F14K infection during screening and response in selected accessions.

From: EcoTILLING in Capsicum species: searching for new virus resistances

Accession

Species

eIF4E/eIF(iso)4E proteins

Mean symptom indexa

Mean absorbance (A405)a

% positive plantsc

Responsed

   

15 Db

30 D

45 D

60 D

15 D

30 D

45 D

60 D

  

CDP06188

C. annuum

AC

0

0

0

0

0.05

0.03

0.03

0.02

0

R

CDP09688

C. annuum

B_CD

0

0

0

0

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0

R

CDP01263

C. chinense

BB

3.5

2.5

1.5

1

1.24

0.89

0.65

0.29

100

S

CDP04928

C. annuum

BC

0

0

0.5

1

0.07

0.46

0.72

0.37

100

S

CDP01246

C. annuum

BD

0.5

0.9

1.1

1.5

0.27

0.51

0.61

0.57

100

S

CDP08791

C. chacoense

CE

2

2.5

3.5

3.5

0.85

1.81

1.73

1.79

100

S

CDP02521

C. chinense

DB

0

0

0

0

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.02

0

R

CDP06433

C. annuum

EC

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.05

0

R

CDP01135

C. annuum

ED

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.01

0

R

CDP00614

C. baccatum

FA

0

0

0

0

0.54

0.25

0.17

0.26

100

T

CDP05838

C. frutescens

FB

0

1.6

1

0.5

0.76

0.67

0.52

0.97

100

S

CDP00624

C. baccatum

FC

0

0.5

0.5

0

0.87

0.35

0.14

0.35

100

S

CDP06234

C. baccatum

FC

0

0

0

0

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.03

0

R

CDP00620

C. annuum

FD

0.9

1.9

2.3

1.9

0.64

1.01

1.37

1.12

100

S

CDP05436

C. frutescens

GB

0

0.9

1.3

1

1.36

0.88

0.98

1.33

100

S

CDP00973

C. frutescens

GC

0

0.8

1

0.8

1.21

0.66

1.39

1.09

100

S

CDP08407

C. chinense

HB

0

0

0

0

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.03

0

R

CDP07700

C. chinense

IB

0

0

0

0

0.26

0.22

0.03

0.03

60

T

CDP00590

C. pubescens

JG

2

2.4

1

0.2

1.81

1.6

0.68

1.55

100

S

CDP04291

C. baccatum

KA

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.04

0.03

0.02

0

R

CDP02320

C. baccatum

KC

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.03

0.02

0.04

0

R

CDP05581

C. baccatum

LC

0

0

0

0

1.64

1.13

0.76

0.32

100

T

CDP06360

C. baccatum

MC

0

0

0

0

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.09

60

T

CDP07825

C. baccatum

MF

0

0

0

0

0.43

0.41

1.61

1.32

100

T

CDP04865

C. baccatum

NA

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.04

0.04

0.06

0

R

CDP07490

C. baccatum

NC

0

0

0

0

0.05

0.02

0.02

0.03

0

R

CDP04131

C. baccatum

NF

0

0

0

0

0.05

0.05

0.04

0.06

0

R

CDP09967

C. baccatum

OA

0

0

0

0

0.04

0.04

0.02

0.02

0

R

CDP09334

C. baccatum

OC

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.04

0.03

0.04

0

R

CDP01186

C. chinense

PB

2.5

3

3

3.5

0.88

0.19

0.23

0.25

100

S

CDP05929

C. baccatum

QA

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.01

0

R

CDP04710

C. baccatum

QC

0

0

0

0

0.33

0.18

0.13

0.16

100

T

CDP06951

C. frutescens

RB

0

0

0

0

1.44

0.77

1.21

1.34

100

T

CDP02198

C. annuum

Control

0.7

1.7

1.5

1.9

0.41

0.34

0.33

0.32

100

S

CDP05523

C. annuum

Control

2.1

2.8

3.2

3.5

0.88

0.6

0.7

1.27

100

S

  1. a, Arithmetic mean calculated from all plants of the accession at each time sampling. The symptom index ranged from 0 (symptomless plant) to 4 (dead plant). b, D: Days post inoculation. c, Percentage of DAS-ELISA positive plants. Plants were considered to be DAS-ELISA positive when absorbance (405 nm) of sample from the youngest leaf was higher than three times the negative control mean, and classified as non-infected (DAS-ELISA negative) when the value of absorbance was below this threshold. The negative control mean was calculated for each accession with different time samplings (15, 30, 45 and 60 days post inoculation). d, R: Resistant. No plants were infected systemically and no symptoms were identified. S: Susceptible. Showed DAS-ELISA positive and systemic symptoms. T: Tolerant. Showed DAS-ELISA positive in all or some plants but without symptoms.