Table 9 Comparison of EST sequencing statistics for Sanger sequencing
Organisms | Number of ESTs (a) | Contigs (b) | Singletons (c) | Number of Unigenes (b + c) | % of contig (b/(b + c)) | Redundancy ((b + c)/a) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oak | 134500 | 17499 | 23445 | 40944 | 42.7% | 30.4% | This study |
Cotton | 153969 | 22030 | 29077 | 51107 | 43.1% | 33.2% | Udall et al. [66] |
Cocoa | 149650 | 12692 | 35902 | 48594 | 26.1% | 32.5% | Argout et al. [67] |
Spruce | 147146 | 19941 | 26804 | 46745 | 42.7% | 31.8% | Ralph et al. [68] |
Actinidia | 132577 | 18070 | 23788 | 41858 | 43.2% | 31.6% | Crowhurst et al. [69] |
Poplar | 102019 | 15574 | 19563 | 35137 | 44.3% | 34.4% | Sterky et al. [70] |
Lotus | 74472 | 8503 | 11954 | 20457 | 41.6% | 27.5% | Asamizu et al. [71] |
Citrus | 52626 | 7120 | 8544 | 15664 | 45.5% | 29.8% | Terol et al. [72] |