Skip to main content

Table 3 Prediction results when combining module-based CCS, orthology relationships, and neighboring proteins.

From: Combining modularity, conservation, and interactions of proteins significantly increases precision and coverage of protein function prediction

  

0.3

  

0.5

  

0.7

 
 

# terms

P

Rpp

# terms

P

Rpp

# terms

P

Rpp

dme

6242

0.50

0.29

5072

0.52

0.25

1522

0.73

0.32

sce

3567

0.61

0.27

2581

0.71

0.28

1303

0.83

0.40

rno

1125

0.63

0.20

485

0.67

0.27

1185

0.85

0.30

hsa

1489

0.56

0.29

368

0.85

0.34

223

0.89

0.34

sce

1870

0.60

0.25

1206

0.61

0.17

229

0.86

0.24

hsa

13975

0.46

0.35

4418

0.57

0.36

723

0.73

0.33

dme

18638

0.62

0.41

16225

0.61

0.38

3462

0.71

0.48

sce

16544

0.72

0.44

15524

0.72

0.43

4135

0.84

0.55

hsa

3314

0.47

0.25

439

0.75

0.28

160

0.91

0.41

dme

5190

0.58

0.22

4586

0.59

0.23

866

0.81

0.29

cel

2464

0.47

0.27

1796

0.56

0.27

256

0.65

0.31

sce

5361

0.70

0.31

5126

0.71

0.32

1212

0.80

0.37

mmu

1212

0.66

0.17

459

0.81

0.32

53

0.81

0.34

hsa

3301

0.48

0.28

1658

0.57

0.33

436

0.65

0.81

dme

5561

0.56

0.29

4642

0.57

0.29

1400

0.59

0.55

sce

5159

0.63

0.31

4906

0.63

0.31

2140

0.73

0.72

average

5870

0.58

0.29

4343

0.65

0.30

1160

0.77

0.42

  1. Precision (P) and per-protein recall (Rpp) are estimated for low (0.3), medium (0.5) and high (0.7) functional similarity/conservation thresholds.