Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Performance comparison between TAPIR, Target-align and p-TAREF for Target-align/TAPIR Reference dataset for benchmarking.

From: Employing machine learning for reliable miRNA target identification in plants

  TAPIR Target-align p-TAREF
  Fasta RNAhybrid Less stringent More stringent Polynomial kernel
TP Rate % 91.83 93.14 97.05 93.14 100
FP Rate % 81.47 88.97 84 57.8 56.2
  1. *TP = True Positive;FP = False Positive
  2. The same benchmarking dataset and procedure was used for p-TAREF as had been used previously by the two tools. P-TAREF was found performing better.
Back to article page