Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison between TAPIR, Target-align and p-TAREF for Target-align/TAPIR Reference dataset for benchmarking.

From: Employing machine learning for reliable miRNA target identification in plants

 

TAPIR

Target-align

p-TAREF

 

Fasta

RNAhybrid

Less stringent

More stringent

Polynomial kernel

TP Rate %

91.83

93.14

97.05

93.14

100

FP Rate %

81.47

88.97

84

57.8

56.2

  1. *TP = True Positive;FP = False Positive
  2. The same benchmarking dataset and procedure was used for p-TAREF as had been used previously by the two tools. P-TAREF was found performing better.
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us