Table 2 Comparison of performance as a function of window size for the Mus musculus organism.
Organism: Mus musculus | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Window size | Ac | Pr | Se | Sp | Adj |
Evaluation of windows of symmetric size | |||||
-8+8 | 87,77 (1,50) | 22,46 (2,41) | 79,82 (9,16) | 88,11 (1,69) | 83,97 (4,25) |
-12+12 | 91,35 (1,15) | 29,91 (3,87) | 81,13 (7,56) | 91,77 (1,11) | 86,45 (3,90) |
-20+20 | 94,03 (0,69) | 39,08 (4,15) | 81,06 (5,96) | 94,58 (0,66) | 87,82 (3,03) |
-30+30 | 96,42 (0,61) | 54,08 (5,68) | 81,99 (9,10) | 97,03 (0,63) | 89,51 (4,48) |
-40+40 | 97,49 (0,55) | 66,18 (7,68) | 77,06 (6,66) | 98,32 (0,63) | 87,69 (3,22) |
-50+50 | 98,21 (0,41) | 77,95 (6,78) | 74,17 (8,29) | 99,16 (0,30) | 86,66 (4,15) |
-60+60 | 98,27 (0,53) | 82,74 (4,66) | 68,20 (11,75) | 99,45 (0,18) | 83,83 (5,86) |
Evaluation of windows of asymmetric size | |||||
Evaluation of upstream region | |||||
-8+30 | 94,35 (0,89) | 41,07 (5,44) | 82,03 (8,65) | 94,87 (0,96) | 88,45 (4,22) |
-10+30 | 95,23 (1,09) | 46,44 (9,42) | 82,13 (8,94) | 95,79 (1,12) | 88,96 (4,48) |
-12+30 | 94,77 (0,89) | 43,99 (10,75) | 81,28 (9,13) | 95,29 (1,19) | 88,28 (4,44) |
-30+30 | 96,42 (0,61) | 54,08 (5,68) | 81,99 (9,10) | 97,03 (0,63) | 89,51 (4,48) |
-50+30 | 97,39 (0,60) | 63,65 (10,54) | 78,45 (8,34) | 98,14 (0,67) | 88,30 (4,08) |
Evaluation of downstream region | |||||
-10+10 | 89,96 (1,35) | 27,01 (3,19) | 82,80 (7,96) | 90,26 (1,60) | 86,53 (3,51) |
-10+20 | 92,44 (1,25) | 33,49 (4,60) | 81,85 (8,79) | 92,90 (1,43) | 87,37 (4,13) |
-10+30 | 95,23 (1,09) | 46,44 (9,42) | 82,13 (8,94) | 95,79 (1,12) | 88,96 (4,48) |
-10+50 | 96,29 (0,98) | 54,67 (10,78) | 78,77 (7,13) | 97,04 (1,09) | 87,90 (3,47) |