Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of performance as a function of window size for the Mus musculus organism.

From: Improvement in the prediction of the translation initiation site through balancing methods, inclusion of acquired knowledge and addition of features to sequences of mRNA

Organism: Mus musculus
Window size Ac Pr Se Sp Adj
Evaluation of windows of symmetric size
-8+8 87,77 (1,50) 22,46 (2,41) 79,82 (9,16) 88,11 (1,69) 83,97 (4,25)
-12+12 91,35 (1,15) 29,91 (3,87) 81,13 (7,56) 91,77 (1,11) 86,45 (3,90)
-20+20 94,03 (0,69) 39,08 (4,15) 81,06 (5,96) 94,58 (0,66) 87,82 (3,03)
-30+30 96,42 (0,61) 54,08 (5,68) 81,99 (9,10) 97,03 (0,63) 89,51 (4,48)
-40+40 97,49 (0,55) 66,18 (7,68) 77,06 (6,66) 98,32 (0,63) 87,69 (3,22)
-50+50 98,21 (0,41) 77,95 (6,78) 74,17 (8,29) 99,16 (0,30) 86,66 (4,15)
-60+60 98,27 (0,53) 82,74 (4,66) 68,20 (11,75) 99,45 (0,18) 83,83 (5,86)
Evaluation of windows of asymmetric size
Evaluation of upstream region
-8+30 94,35 (0,89) 41,07 (5,44) 82,03 (8,65) 94,87 (0,96) 88,45 (4,22)
-10+30 95,23 (1,09) 46,44 (9,42) 82,13 (8,94) 95,79 (1,12) 88,96 (4,48)
-12+30 94,77 (0,89) 43,99 (10,75) 81,28 (9,13) 95,29 (1,19) 88,28 (4,44)
-30+30 96,42 (0,61) 54,08 (5,68) 81,99 (9,10) 97,03 (0,63) 89,51 (4,48)
-50+30 97,39 (0,60) 63,65 (10,54) 78,45 (8,34) 98,14 (0,67) 88,30 (4,08)
Evaluation of downstream region
-10+10 89,96 (1,35) 27,01 (3,19) 82,80 (7,96) 90,26 (1,60) 86,53 (3,51)
-10+20 92,44 (1,25) 33,49 (4,60) 81,85 (8,79) 92,90 (1,43) 87,37 (4,13)
-10+30 95,23 (1,09) 46,44 (9,42) 82,13 (8,94) 95,79 (1,12) 88,96 (4,48)
-10+50 96,29 (0,98) 54,67 (10,78) 78,77 (7,13) 97,04 (1,09) 87,90 (3,47)
  1. These results were obtained using class balancing and the M-Clus method. No features were considered and the method of including acquired knowledge, InAKnow, was not used.