Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of performance as a function of window size for the Rattus novergicus organism.

From: Improvement in the prediction of the translation initiation site through balancing methods, inclusion of acquired knowledge and addition of features to sequences of mRNA

Organism: Rattus novergicus
Window size Ac Pr Se Sp Adj
Evaluation of windows of symmetric size
-8+8 92,28 (0,85) 7,77 (1,69) 84,17 (15,04) 92,34 (0,88) 88,25 (7,39)
-12+12 94,27 (1,09) 9,75 (1,67) 79,09 (15,84) 94,39 (1,16) 86,74 (7,58)
-20+20 96,99 (0,97) 19,06 (9,96) 76,11 (21,38) 97,16 (1,10) 86,63 (10,39)
-30+30 98,95 (0,28) 39,69 (10,19) 72,05 (17,56) 99,15 (0,32) 85,60 (8,72)
-40+40 99,56 (0,20) 72,17 (16,36) 71,21 (12,16) 99,76 (0,18) 85,49 (6,07)
-50+50 99,67 (0,18) 89,40 (11,72) 62,75 (17,34) 99,94 (0,06) 81,35 (8,66)
-60+60 99,70 (0,12) 94,67 (8,19) 59,54 (11,39) 99,97 (0,04) 79,76 (5,70)
Evaluation of windows of asymmetric size
Evaluation of upstream region
-8+30 97,07 (0,97) 20,40 (6,78) 83,17 (11,21) 95,15 (0,98) 89,16 (5,56)
-10+30 97,14 (0,76) 19,35 (4,36) 82,09 (14,05) 97,26 (0,79) 89,67 (6,91)
-12+30 98,70 (0,52) 24,72 (7,45) 76,47 (16,50) 98,70 (0,43) 87,58 (8,05)
-30+30 98,95 (0,28) 39,69 (10,19) 72,05 (17,56) 99,15 (0,32) 85,60 (8,72)
-50+30 99,65 (0,18) 84,63 (11,14) 64,00 (16,81) 99,91 (0,08) 81,95 (8,39)
Evaluation of downstream region
-10+10 93,76 (1,16) 8,94 (1,45) 78,09 (14,08) 93,88 (1,22) 85,99 (6,73)
-10+20 95,21 (0,85) 11,75 (2,11) 80,09 (11,04) 95,32 (0,87) 87,70 (5,46)
-10+30 97,14 (0,76) 19,35 (4,36) 82,09 (14,05) 97,26 (0,79) 89,67 (6,91)
-10+50 98,80 (0,27) 37,76 (7,45) 78,09 (17,84) 98,97 (0,24) 88,53 (8,92)
  1. These results were obtained using class balancing and the M-Clus method. No features were considered and the method of including acquired knowledge, InAKnow, was not used.