Table 1 Comparison of original and new mono-nucleotide PWM
From: Optimizing the GATA-3 position weight matrix to improve the identification of novel binding sites
A) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
A | 25 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 39 | 15 |
T | 20 | 0 | 1 | 58 | 19 | 8 |
G | 4 | 62 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 37 |
C | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
A | 0.40 | 0.0 | 0.97 | 0.0 | 0.62 | 0.24 |
T | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.30 | 0.17 |
G | 0.06 | 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.59 |
C | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
A | 0.00 | -3.83 | 0.00 | -4.12 | 0.00 | -0.55 |
T | -0.021 | -3.82 | -4.10 | 0.00 | -0.79 | -1.16 |
G | -2.19 | 0.00 | -4.47 | -2.81 | -2.63 | 0.00 |
C | -0.92 | -4.11 | -4.51 | -4.47 | -4.10 | -2.50 |
| Â | a/t | G | A | T | A | g/a |
B) | ||||||
| Â | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
A | 27 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 43 | 16 |
T | 22 | 0 | 1 | 63 | 20 | 8 |
G | 4 | 67 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 41 |
C | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
A | 0.40 | 0.0 | 0.97 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.24 |
T | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.29 | 0.12 |
G | 0.06 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
C | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
A | 0.00 | -3.83 | 0.00 | -4.13 | 0.00 | -0.59 |
T | -0.19 | -3.82 | -3.48 | 0.00 | -0.76 | -1.27 |
G | -2.26 | 0.00 | -3.84 | -2.9 | -2.73 | 0.00 |
C | -0.93 | -3.49 | -4.52 | -4.48 | -3.4 | -2.61 |
| Â | a/t | G | A | T | A | g/a |