Skip to main content

Table 10 Comparison of offspring abnormalities reported by Laurie et al .[28]

From: Sensitive and specific detection of mosaic chromosomal abnormalities using the Parent-of-Origin-based Detection (POD) method

 

Laurie et al.

triPOD

 

CIDR_Name

ID

Type

Chr

Start

Stop

Type

PO

Mb

mBAF

LRR

Concordance

13069_01

58

loss

17

26056501

27338617

DEL

F

1.28

0.61

−0.166

0.9977

17008_01

330

aupd

2

23012

242692820

UPiD

F

6.08

0.87

0.008

0.9996

19173_01

160

loss

2

165344115

166416787

DEL

F

1.07

0.68

−0.209

0.9997

19173_01

160

loss

4

101577666

106585658

DEL

M

5.01

0.68

−0.216

0.9997

19218_01

248

aupd

5

170750020

180837061

UPiD

M

10.09

0.58

0.040

0.9994

20127_01

357

aupd

11

63941311

134433812

UPiD

F

70.49

0.55

0.004

1.0000

20183_01

82

aupd

13

23271930

114108295

UPiD

F

90.84

0.56

0.022

0.9999

21089_01

269

aupd

20

29945359

62207762

UPiD

M

11.09

0.58

−0.019

0.9932

22144_01

75

loss

9

89688030

89910321

NA

F(C)

0.22

0.54

−0.028

1.0000

23020_01

207

loss

18

60033312

75686888

DEL

F

15.65

0.89

−0.614

0.9965

  1. aupd acquired UPD; Concordance: the proportion of base pairs in agreement between the regions reported by triPOD and those reported by Laurie et al. Additional abbreviations as described in Table 8. Columns 4-11 correspond to the triPOD analysis.