Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 10 Comparison of offspring abnormalities reported by Laurie et al .[28]

From: Sensitive and specific detection of mosaic chromosomal abnormalities using the Parent-of-Origin-based Detection (POD) method

  Laurie et al. triPOD  
CIDR_Name ID Type Chr Start Stop Type PO Mb mBAF LRR Concordance
13069_01 58 loss 17 26056501 27338617 DEL F 1.28 0.61 −0.166 0.9977
17008_01 330 aupd 2 23012 242692820 UPiD F 6.08 0.87 0.008 0.9996
19173_01 160 loss 2 165344115 166416787 DEL F 1.07 0.68 −0.209 0.9997
19173_01 160 loss 4 101577666 106585658 DEL M 5.01 0.68 −0.216 0.9997
19218_01 248 aupd 5 170750020 180837061 UPiD M 10.09 0.58 0.040 0.9994
20127_01 357 aupd 11 63941311 134433812 UPiD F 70.49 0.55 0.004 1.0000
20183_01 82 aupd 13 23271930 114108295 UPiD F 90.84 0.56 0.022 0.9999
21089_01 269 aupd 20 29945359 62207762 UPiD M 11.09 0.58 −0.019 0.9932
22144_01 75 loss 9 89688030 89910321 NA F(C) 0.22 0.54 −0.028 1.0000
23020_01 207 loss 18 60033312 75686888 DEL F 15.65 0.89 −0.614 0.9965
  1. aupd acquired UPD; Concordance: the proportion of base pairs in agreement between the regions reported by triPOD and those reported by Laurie et al. Additional abbreviations as described in Table 8. Columns 4-11 correspond to the triPOD analysis.