Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis of large low-level mosaic abnormalities in the AGRE autism dataset

From: Sensitive and specific detection of mosaic chromosomal abnormalities using the Parent-of-Origin-based Detection (POD) method

Region

Sample

Chr

Size(SNPs)

% Mosaic

triPOD

PSCN

MAD

BAFseg

genoCNA

PennCNV

1

AU031003

5

9664

2.1 - 6.4

0.96

0.02

0

0.02

0.06

0

2

AU036104

22

4970

4.9 - 12.6

0.89

0.02

0

0

0

0

3

AU051503

7

7707

3.7 - 10.7

0.69

0.03

0

0

0

0

4

AU068604

5

1499

5.6 - 16.5

1

0

0

0

0

0

5

AU072004

1

19981

6.5 - 18.7

1

0.93

0

0.03

0.05

0

6

AU073006

8

1710

8.4 - 24

0.97

0.87

0.99

0.05

0

0

7

AU0871303

11

5219

2.8 - 8.1

0.99

0

0

0.02

0.03

0

8

AU1271304

9

3202

2.5 – 6.8

0.73

0.39

0

0.01

0.02

0

9

AU1285302

13

7455

7.3 – 21.5

1

1

0.93

1

0.91

0

10

AU1346302

19

3241

6.7 - 19.2

1

0.45

0

0

0

0

11

AU1462303

9

15601

2.2 - 6.0

0.81

0.48

0

0

0

0

12

AU1585303

9

15421

2.8 - 8.1

0.92

0.02

0

0.01

0.07

0

  1. The sensitivity of abnormal region detection for 12 samples in the AGRE autism dataset harboring a large low-level mosaic abnormality is presented. The samples were analyzed by triPOD, BAFsegmentation (unpaired), genoCNA, MAD, PennCNV joint, and PSCN. (Sensitivity results < 0.01 are reported as 0). The % Mosaic column is the estimated percent mosaicism calculated, using BAF values >= the baseline median and < 0.7, as the ratio of the distance of the abnormal BAF median from the baseline median and the expected distance of a 100% mosaic abnormality from the baseline median. For low-level mosaicism, the type of abnormality is difficult to distinguish based on LRR values, thus a range is provided to account for regions resulting from a deletion or UPD event (smaller percentage) or an amplification.